Case Report Open Access
Copyright ©2012 Baishideng Publishing Group Co., Limited. All rights reserved.
World J Gastroenterol. Sep 21, 2012; 18(35): 4962-4966
Published online Sep 21, 2012. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v18.i35.4962
Metastases of esophageal carcinoma to skeletal muscle: Single center experience
Jan Cincibuch, Bohuslav Melichar, Michaela Zezulová, Hana Procházková-Študentová, Miloslava Zlevorová, Karel Cwiertka, Department of Oncology, Palacký University Medical School and Teaching Hospital, 77520 Olomouc, Czech Republic
Miroslav Mysliveček, Iva Metelková, Department of Nuclear Medicine, Palacký University Medical School and Teaching Hospital, 77520 Olomouc, Czech Republic
Čestmír Neoral, René Aujeský, 1st Department of Surgery, Palacký University Medical School and Teaching Hospital, 77520 Olomouc, Czech Republic
Patrik Flodr, Department of Pathology, Palacký University Medical School and Teaching Hospital, 77520 Olomouc, Czech Republic
Author contributions: Cincibuch J and Melichar B were involved in the conception of the paper, data acquisition and analysis and coordinated the writing of the manuscript; Mysliveček M, Neoral Č, Metelková I, Zezulová M, Procházková-Študentová H, Flodr P, Zlevorová M, Aujeský R and Cwiertka K participated in the data acquisition and analysis, and contributed to the writing of the manuscript; all authors read and approved the final version of the manuscript.
Supported by Biomedreg CZ.1.05/2.1.00/01.0030
Correspondence to: Bohuslav Melichar, MD, PhD, Professor and Head, Department of Oncology, Palacký University Medical School and Teaching Hospital, I.P. Pavlova 6, 77520 Olomouc, Czech Republic. bohuslav.melichar@fnol.cz
Telephone: +420-588-444288 Fax: +420-588-442522
Received: April 9, 2012
Revised: June 26, 2012
Accepted: July 9, 2012
Published online: September 21, 2012

Abstract

Metastases of esophageal carcinoma to the skeletal muscle are rare, but the incidence may be increasing because of better diagnosis resulting from widespread use of positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT). A cohort of 205 patients with esophageal carcinoma treated at our center who had PET/CT between 2006 and 2010 was retrospectively evaluated for the presence of skeletal muscle metastases. Four patients had skeletal muscle metastases of esophageal carcinoma, including two patients with squamous cell carcinoma. In another patient with squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus and synchronous skeletal muscle metastases, muscle metastases were subsequently shown to be related to second primary pancreatic adenocarcinoma. In all cases, skeletal muscle metastases were the first manifestation of systemic disease. In three patients palliation was obtained with the combination of external beam radiation therapy, systemic chemotherapy or surgical resection. Skeletal muscle metastases are a rare complication of esophageal carcinoma.

Key Words: Drug therapy, Esophageal neoplasms, Muscle, Skeletal, Positron-emission tomography, Radiotherapy



INTRODUCTION

The prognosis of esophageal carcinoma is, in general, poor, with the mortality rate reaching 90% of the incidence rate[1]. Both uncontrolled growth of the primary tumor or locoregional recurrence and distant metastases may be the ultimate cause of death in individual patient. Esophageal carcinoma commonly spreads to the liver, lung, adrenals, bone, pleura, peritoneum or pericardium. Less frequent sites of metastases include thyroid, pancreas, spleen, ovary, kidney, heart, skin, gallbladder or small and large bowel[2,3]. Metastatic involvement of skeletal muscle is rare.

Until recently, asymptomatic skeletal muscle metastases (SMM) were detected only fortuitously. The widespread use of positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) resulted in the detection of asymptomatic metastases in different organs, including skeletal muscle. A number of case reports or case series on SMM in patients with different primary tumors, including esophageal carcinoma, have been published[4-8], but the natural history of SMM in patients with esophageal carcinoma remains largely unknown. We report here five cases of patients with esophageal carcinoma and SMM observed in our center.

CASE REPORT

Records of 205 patients with esophageal carcinoma treated at our center who had PET/CT between 2006 and 2010 were searched to identify patients who had SMM diagnosed.

SMM were diagnosed in 5 patients (2%), all males. In one of these patients, SMM were subsequently shown to be related to a second primary tumor (Table 1). The details of these cases are outlined below.

Table 1 Patients with esophageal carcinoma and skeletal muscle metastases in the present series.
PatientAge at diagnosis (yr)HistologyStage at diagnosisTimingPrimary therapyMetastatic interval (mo)SymptomsDiagnosisLocationOther metastasesTherapy for muscle metastasesSurvival from the diagnosis of muscle metastasis (mo)
164AdenoIIMetachronousCXRT32MassPET/CT; biopsyQuadriceps femorisB; LN (subs)CXRT31
276SCCIIIMetachronousCXRT5NonePET/CT; biopsyGluteus minimus; psoasL; P; A; LN (subs)CXRT16
357SCCIVSynchronousNone0NonePET/CTSubscapularisBCRT; subs XRT5
442AdenoIVSynchronousCXRT0NonePET/CT; biopsyIliacusPRS16
560SCC; adeno (pancreas)IVSynchronousNone0NonePET/CT; autopsyMultipleMultipleNone2
Case 1

A 64-year-old male was diagnosed with adenocarcinoma of the distal esophagus in February 2004. The staging examination that included laparoscopy did not reveal distant metastases. The patient was treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiation. Transhiatal esophagectomy was performed on June 1, 2004. Histological examination of the resection specimen revealed pathologic complete response. The course of the follow-up was uneventful until October 2006 when the patient observed a resistance in the left thigh. Whole body [18F] fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET/CT performed in December 2006 revealed high focal uptake in the left quadriceps femoris muscle and in the left inguinal and iliac lymph nodes (Figure 1), with no evidence of a second primary tumor. An excisional biopsy established the diagnosis of SMM of adenocarcinoma.

Figure 1
Figure 1 [18F] fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography showing a metastasis in the left quadriceps femoris muscle.

The metastatic involvement of skeletal muscle and lymph nodes was treated with external beam radiation (50 Gy) that was administered in February and March 2007 along with 2 cycles of systemic chemotherapy (cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil). Four cycles of systemic chemotherapy using the same schedule have been administered subsequently until September 2007. A control FDG PET/CT in October 2007 demonstrated persistent uptake of radioactivity in the thigh metastasis that decreased in size. Additional metastatic lesions were discovered in medial condylus of the left femur and the retroperitoneal lymph nodes. The patient was feeling well and was subsequently only followed. In May 2008 an edema of the left lower extremity manifested. Control FDG PET/CT in June 2008 demonstrated uptake in retroperitoneal, mediastinal and left supraclavicular lymph nodes, lungs and left tibia as well as persistent accumulation in the left thigh. Between July and October 2008, the patient was treated with 5 cycles of combination of cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil. After the completion of chemotherapy, only symptomatic therapy was administered. The patient died on May 18, 2009, 31 mo after the diagnosis of skeletal muscle metastasis. An autopsy was not performed.

Case 2

76-year-old male was diagnosed in June 2006 with squamous cell carcinoma of the middle esophagus. Staging FDG PET/CT did not reveal distant metastases or evidence of a second primary tumor. The patient was treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiation that consisted of external beam radiation (50 Gy in 25 fractions of 2 Gy with systemic cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil). The control FDG PET/CT in November 2006 revealed complete disappearance of FDG uptake in the primary, but a pathologic accumulation in the right gluteus minimus muscle (21 mm × 14 mm in size) was noted. Because of complete response, patient age and uncertainty about the systemic disease, esophagectomy was not performed, and the patient was further only followed. On control FDG PET/CT, no uptake in the primary tumor was observed, but the size of the lesion in gluteus minimus muscle increased to 66 mm × 44 mm × 34 mm and involved bone. In addition, similar lesion was noted in the left psoas muscle. A biopsy performed in April 2007 confirmed metastasis of squamous cell carcinoma. Between May and July 2007 external beam radiation was administered to both lesions (70 Gy in 35 fractions of 2 Gy) concomitantly with 2 cycles of systemic cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil. Control FDG PET/CT in September 2007 demonstrated metastatic spread to the lungs, pleura, adrenals and retroperitoneal lymph nodes. Only symptomatic therapy was administered after the diagnosis of progressive metastatic disease, and the patient died on March 4, 2008, 16 mo after detection of SMM. An autopsy was not performed.

Case 3

A 57-year-old male was diagnosed in September 2006 with squamous cell carcinoma of the middle third of the esophagus. Staging FDG PET/CT performed in October 2006 revealed an accumulation of radioactivity not only in the primary tumor, but also in the skeleton of the pelvis and in the right subscapularis muscle. No evidence of a second primary tumor was found. The biopsy of the lesions was considered technically difficult, and the diagnosis of metastatic esophageal carcinoma was made based on multiplicity and appearance of lesions. Between October and December 2006 the patient was treated with 3 cycles of systemic chemotherapy (cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil). Chemotherapy had to be interrupted in January 2007 because of pneumonia. A control FDG PET/CT in February 2007 revealed mild progression. Palliative external beam radiation therapy (45 Gy in 18 fractions of 2.5 Gy) of all three sites of disease was then performed, but the condition of the patient deteriorated, with the progression of dysphagia. The patient died on March 24, 2007, 5 mo after the diagnosis of SMM. An autopsy was not performed.

Case 4

42-year-old male presented with adenocarcinoma of distal esophagus and cardia in April 2010. Staging FDG PET/CT demonstrated high FDG uptake in the primary tumor and a 2 cm mass in the iliacus muscle, with no evidence of a second primary tumor. As staging laparoscopy performed in May 2010 did not reveal spread in the abdominal cavity, the patient was referred for concomitant chemoradiation (50 Gy in 25 fractions of 2 Gy) and 2 cycles of systemic chemotherapy (cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil). Control PET/CT in October 2010 demonstrated only moderate progression in the primary, but marked progression of SMM (4 cm). The patient underwent subsequently (in October 2010) esophagectomy and resection of the muscle mass. Histologic examination of the muscle metastasis demonstrated poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma similar to the esophageal primary. The patient was then followed. In April 2011, the patient presented again with dysphagic complaints. Stenosis of the anastomosis was detected, and biopsy confirmed recurrence of adenocarcinoma. During the surgery to perform a jejunostomy, peritoneal carcinomatosis was detected and a large abdominal metastasis was resected. After a brief course of investigational therapy in a clinical trial the disease progressed and the patient was treated symptomatically. The patient died on August 27, 2011, 16 mo after diagnosis of SMM. An autopsy was not performed.

Case 5

60-year-old male was diagnosed in January 2010 with squamous cell carcinoma of the distal esophagus. Staging FDG PET/CT performed in February 2010 demonstrated high uptake in the tumor of distal esophagus, in lymph nodes adjacent to lesser curvature of the stomach, in the liver, left adrenal, bone and multiple metastases in skeletal muscle, including gluteus maximus muscle. Because of the extent of metastatic disease, only symptomatic therapy was indicated and histological verification of metastases was not sought. An esophageal stent was introduced to palliate the stenosis. The procedure resulted in the relief of the symptoms of short duration, but in March 2010 the condition of the patient deteriorated, he was admitted for back pain and died on March 21, 2010. Autopsy demonstrated, besides squamous cell carcinoma of the distal esophagus, a second primary pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Autopsy also revealed metastases in mediastinal and abdominal lymph nodes, peritoneum, pleura, lung, liver, kidneys, adrenal, thyroid, left submandibular gland, skeletal muscle, subcutis and bone. The histology of all metastases was adenocarcinoma pointing to pancreatic primary.

DISCUSSION

The 2% incidence of SMM in the present series may be affected by selection bias, as the primary diagnosis in one of the patients was performed before 2006. The information on esophageal carcinoma SMM is limited to individual case reports (Table 2), or to series of patients with SMM[5]. However, in most series of patients with SMM, no cases of patients with esophageal primary have been described[4,6-8]. SMM were also not reported in most autopsy series of esophageal carcinoma patients[2,3,9,10]. Cases of SMM have also been described in patients with gastric cancer[6]. To the best of our knowledge, only one case of squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus metastatic to the skeletal muscle has been reported so far, with few details described[5]. Two of the patients reported here therefore represent the second description SMM of squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus. The case of the patient with clinically undetected pancreatic adenocarcinoma demonstrates that histological verification may be needed not only to verify the neoplastic nature of the muscle lesion, but also to determine the primary as the frequency of second primary tumors is increasing. This case also indicates that a possible occult second primary tumor represents limitation in retrospective series of rare distant metastases. Histological verification confirming esophageal primary origin was possible in 3 out of 4 remaining cases. In all four cases SMMs were the first manifestation of metastatic disease. In patients with metachronous metastases, SMM involvement preceded the manifestation of metastatic spread to other organs by several months and survival times were relatively favorable in the context of metastatic esophageal carcinoma.

Table 2 Overview of the reports of esophageal carcinoma skeletal muscle metastases.
Ref.SexAge (yr)HistologyTimingSymptomsDiagnosisLocation of muscle metastasesOther metastasesTherapyOutcome
Heyer et al[18]M54AdenoSynchronousAsymptomatic; fortuitously detected during CTCT; MRI; biopsyMultipleNoneCXRT (to the primary)ND
Rehman et al[19]M71AdenoNDPain; unable to walkMRI; biopsyThighNDXRT (metastases)Symptomatic relief 2 wk later
Kozyreva et al[20]M72Adeno (T3N1Mx)SynchronousAsymptomatic; fortuitously detected during PET/CTPET/CT; biopsyDeltoidNoneC (oxaliplatin + 5FU/FA)Progression of muscle metastases
Schultz et al[5]NDNDSCCSynchronousNDCT; biopsyGluteus minimusNDNDND
Heffernan et al[21]F67Adeno5 mo after surgeryAsymptomatic; fortuitously detected during PET/CTPET/CTMultipleMediastinumNDND
Wu et al[22]M67AdenoSynchronousAsymptomatic; fortuitously detected during PET/CTPET/CT; biopsyGluteus minimusNoneNDND
Lekse et al[23]F78Adeno4 mo after diagnosisDiplopiaCT; biopsyInferior rectus ocularLungSymptomaticND
Lekse et al[23]M78Adeno2 mo after diagnosisDiplopia; loss of visionMRILateral rectus ocularLung; bone; liverXRT; C (5FU + FA)ND

SMM detected with imaging studies were reported in 1%-2% of all patients with metastatic disease, with metastatic involvement limited to skeletal muscle reported in less than 10% of patients[11]. Similarly to the present series, most patients with SMM have metastasis only in one muscle[11]. Given the mass of skeletal muscle in the body, one would expect the metastases to this tissue to be more frequent. Experimental data suggest that muscle contractions result in mechanical destruction of tumor cells arrested in the microvasculature[12]. It has also been hypothesized that high lactate concentrations in the skeletal muscle microenvironment may decrease the responsiveness of muscle vessels to hypoxia, creating an environment unfavorable to angiogenesis[13].

PET/CT is currently being extensively utilized for pre-therapeutic staging of esophageal carcinoma because it was demonstrated that distant metastases missed by other imaging studies may be detected[14,15]. Individual cases of esophageal carcinoma SMM have been noted in cohorts of patients staged by PET/CT[16]. The increased incidence of esophageal carcinoma SMM may not only be the result of better diagnosis with PET/CT, but also of improved prognosis resulting from better control of the primary with the use of combined modality treatment. In fact, in one of the patients in the present series, the patient who had pathologic complete response after primary treatment two years earlier, the diagnosis could be made based on clinical presentation. It is therefore possible that with advances in the therapy of esophageal carcinoma we will witness a further continuous increase of the incidence of SMM.

Little is known about the outcome of metastases affecting specific sites and optimal management of these patients, with the only source of information being anecdotal reports like the present series. In contrast to metastases affecting other organs, e.g., bone, no organ-specific drugs like bisphosphonates are available for SMM. Moreover, the potential utilization of new radiotherapy techniques in SMM is, for obvious reasons, limited. Prolonged survival has been observed in individual patients managed by combination of external beam radiation, surgery or chemotherapy[4,17]. Based on the experience in the present series and other cases reported in the literature, only general recommendations for the management of patients with SMM, including SMM of esophageal carcinoma, can be outlined. Important consideration is symptom control, and the therapeutic strategy has to be tailored according the muscle affected. Similarly to metastases of other location, the best control may be obtained with surgery which is, however, meaningful only in patients with isolated SMM. In addition, surgery may be necessary to establish the diagnosis of SMM. External beam radiation should be reserved for patients with inoperable or recurrent SMM, including patients with metastases in other sites, and best results may be obtained when combining radiation with platinum-based chemotherapy. No standard fractionation regimen or technique has been established in this rare indication. Outside of setting of chemoradiation regimens, the role of systemic chemotherapy in the management of SMM seems to be limited, but systemic chemotherapy may be an only option in patients with widespread metastases and good general condition. For patients in poor general condition, only symptomatic therapy (mostly corticosteroids and pain medication) is indicated.

In conclusion, while SMM represent a rare event in patients with esophageal carcinoma, the incidence may be increasing because of better diagnosis or improved control of the primary. SMM may represent the first manifestation of metastatic disease. An active therapeutic approach using surgery, external beam radiation and chemotherapy may result in survival that is substantially longer compared to other cases of metastatic esophageal carcinoma.

Footnotes

Peer reviewers: Luigi Bonavina, Professor, Department of Surgery, University of Milano, Via Decembrio 19A, 20137 Milano, Italy; Zhiheng Pei, Associate Professor, Department of Pathology and Medicine, New York University School of Medicine, 6001W, 423 East 23rd street, New York, NY 10010, United States; Dr. Giuseppe S Sica, Department of Surgical Science, Tor Vergata University of Rome, Viale Oxford 81, 00133 Rome, Italy; Dr. Sundeep Singh Saluja, Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, GB Pant Hospital and MAulana Azad Medical College, W/9 West Patel Nagar, New Delhi 110008, India

S- Editor Gou SX L- Editor A E- Editor Zhang DN

References
1.  Kollarova H, Machova L, Horakova D, Janoutova G, Janout V. Epidemiology of esophageal cancer--an overview article. Biomed Pap Med Fac Univ Palacky Olomouc Czech Repub. 2007;151:17-20.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
2.  Mandard AM, Chasle J, Marnay J, Villedieu B, Bianco C, Roussel A, Elie H, Vernhes JC. Autopsy findings in 111 cases of esophageal cancer. Cancer. 1981;48:329-335.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
3.  Quint LE, Hepburn LM, Francis IR, Whyte RI, Orringer MB. Incidence and distribution of distant metastases from newly diagnosed esophageal carcinoma. Cancer. 1995;76:1120-1125.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
4.  Herring CL, Harrelson JM, Scully SP. Metastatic carcinoma to skeletal muscle. A report of 15 patients. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1998;272-281.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
5.  Schultz SR, Bree RL, Schwab RE, Raiss G. CT detection of skeletal muscle metastases. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1986;10:81-83.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
6.  Tuoheti Y, Okada K, Osanai T, Nishida J, Ehara S, Hashimoto M, Itoi E. Skeletal muscle metastases of carcinoma: a clinicopathological study of 12 cases. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2004;34:210-214.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 105]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 109]  [Article Influence: 5.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
7.  Damron TA, Heiner J. Distant soft tissue metastases: a series of 30 new patients and 91 cases from the literature. Ann Surg Oncol. 2000;7:526-534.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
8.  Lee BY, Choi JE, Park JM, Jee WH, Kim JY, Lee KH, Kim HS, Song KS. Various image findings of skeletal muscle metastases with clinical correlation. Skeletal Radiol. 2008;37:923-928.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 17]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 22]  [Article Influence: 1.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
9.  Bosch A, Frias Z, Caldwell WL, Jaeschke WH. Autopsy findings in carcinoma of the esophagus. Acta Radiol Oncol Radiat Phys Biol. 1979;18:103-112.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
10.  Chan KW, Chan EY, Chan CW. Carcinoma of the esophagus. An autopsy study of 231 cases. Pathology. 1986;18:400-405.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
11.  Surov A, Hainz M, Holzhausen HJ, Arnold D, Katzer M, Schmidt J, Spielmann RP, Behrmann C. Skeletal muscle metastases: primary tumours, prevalence, and radiological features. Eur Radiol. 2010;20:649-658.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 108]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 111]  [Article Influence: 7.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
12.  Weiss L. Biomechanical destruction of cancer cells in skeletal muscle: a rate-regulator for hematogenous metastasis. Clin Exp Metastasis. 1989;7:483-491.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
13.  Seely S. Possible reasons for the high resistance of muscle to cancer. Med Hypotheses. 1980;6:133-137.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
14.  van Westreenen HL, Westerterp M, Bossuyt PM, Pruim J, Sloof GW, van Lanschot JJ, Groen H, Plukker JT. Systematic review of the staging performance of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in esophageal cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2004;22:3805-3812.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 273]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 238]  [Article Influence: 11.9]  [Reference Citation Analysis (1)]
15.  Kato H, Miyazaki T, Nakajima M, Takita J, Kimura H, Faried A, Sohda M, Fukai Y, Masuda N, Fukuchi M. The incremental effect of positron emission tomography on diagnostic accuracy in the initial staging of esophageal carcinoma. Cancer. 2005;103:148-156.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 182]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 192]  [Article Influence: 10.1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
16.  Flamen P, Lerut A, Van Cutsem E, De Wever W, Peeters M, Stroobants S, Dupont P, Bormans G, Hiele M, De Leyn P. Utility of positron emission tomography for the staging of patients with potentially operable esophageal carcinoma. J Clin Oncol. 2000;18:3202-3210.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
17.  Luketich JD, Martini N, Ginsberg RJ, Rigberg D, Burt ME. Successful treatment of solitary extracranial metastases from non-small cell lung cancer. Ann Thorac Surg. 1995;60:1609-1611.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
18.  Heyer CM, Rduch GJ, Zgoura P, Stachetzki U, Voigt E, Nicolas V. Metastasis to skeletal muscle from esophageal adenocarcinoma. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2005;40:1000-1004.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 17]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 21]  [Article Influence: 1.1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
19.  Rehman SU, Cope DW, Basile JN. Metastatic gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma to skeletal muscle: a unique event. South Med J. 2002;95:1076-1078.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
20.  Kozyreva ON, Mezentsev DA, King DR, Gomez-Fernandez CR, Ardalan B, Livingstone AS. Asymptomatic muscle metastases from esophageal adenocarcinoma. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25:3780-3783.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 10]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 15]  [Article Influence: 0.9]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
21.  Heffernan E, Fennelly D, Collins CD. Multiple metastases to skeletal muscle from carcinoma of the esophagus detected by FDG PET-CT imaging. Clin Nucl Med. 2006;31:810-811.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 20]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 24]  [Article Influence: 1.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
22.  Wu G, Bybel B, Brunken R, Lin H, Neumann D. PET detection of solitary distant skeletal muscle metastasis of esophageal adenocarcinoma. Clin Nucl Med. 2005;30:335-337.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
23.  Lekse JM, Zhang J, Mawn LA. Metastatic gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma to the extraocular muscles. Ophthalmology. 2003;110:318-321.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]