Guidelines For Clinical Practice Open Access
Copyright ©2012 Baishideng Publishing Group Co., Limited. All rights reserved.
World J Gastroenterol. Jul 14, 2012; 18(26): 3375-3378
Published online Jul 14, 2012. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v18.i26.3375
How can portal vein cavernous transformation cause chronic incomplete biliary obstruction?
Ozgur Harmanci, Yusuf Bayraktar
Ozgur Harmanci, Yusuf Bayraktar, Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, Faculty of Medicine, Hacettepe University, 06100 Ankara, Turkey
Author contributions: Harmanci O and Bayraktar Y contributed equally to this paper.
Correspondence to: Dr. Ozgur Harmanci, MD, Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, Faculty of Medicine, Hacettepe University, 06100 Ankara, Turkey. ozgurmd@hacettepe.edu.tr
Telephone: +90-312-3051714  Fax: +90-312-3051490
Received: November 2, 2011
Revised: February 27, 2012
Accepted: March 19, 2012
Published online: July 14, 2012

Abstract

Biliary disease in the setting of non-cirrhotic portal vein thrombosis (and similarly in portal vein cavernous transformation) can become a serious problem during the evolution of disease. This is mostly due to portal biliary ductopathy. There are several mechanisms that play a role in the development of portal biliary ductopathy, such as induction of fibrosis in the biliary tract (due to direct action of dilated peribiliary collaterals and/or recurrent cholangitis), loss of biliary motility, chronic cholestasis (due to fibrosis or choledocholithiasis) and increased formation of cholelithiasis (due to various factors). The management of cholelithiasis in cases with portal vein cavernous transformation merits special attention. Because of a heterogeneous clinical presentation and concomitant pathophysiological changes that take place in biliary anatomy, diagnosis and therapy can become very complicated. Due to increased incidence and complications of cholelithiasis, standard treatment modalities like sphincterotomy or balloon sweeping of bile ducts can cause serious problems. Cholangitis, biliary strictures and hemobilia are the most common complications that occur during management of these patients. In this review, we specifically discuss important issues about bile stones related to bile duct obstruction in non-cirrhotic portal vein thrombosis and present evidence in the current literature.

Key Words: Portal vein cavernous transformation, Cholelithiasis, Hemobilia, Portal ductopathy, Portal biliopathy



INTRODUCTION

The thrombosis occurring secondary to various causes results in acute and generally asymptomatic thrombosis in an extra-hepatic portion of portal vein transformation (PVT). Eventually, portal vein cavernomatous transformation (PVCT) forms as a compensatory reaction 3 wk to 3 mo after the initial event at the hilum of the liver. However, this salvage also results in inevitable anatomical or functional changes at surrounding structures including the biliary tree, gallbladder and pancreas[1-4]. These changes are secondary to perfusion changes, neovascularization, fibrosis reaction or compression of ducts by newly formed but highly perfused vessels.

Recent terminology uses the term “portal biliopathy” to denote overall anatomical, morphological and functional changes in the biliary tree[5]. The manufactured term “biliopathy” originates from a combination of the Latin word “bilis” (meaning bile) and the Greek word “pathos” (meaning disease) suggesting a disease of liquid bile or its constituents. However, current knowledge lacks compelling evidence of formation of diseased bile in patients with PVCT. Therefore in this review, the term “portal ductopathy” (PD) will be used instead of portal biliopathy as suggested by our group previously[6].

The changes that take place in the biliary ducts during the course of PVCT can be summarized as strictures, dilatations and varicose veins located at the ductular walls and gallbladder. In the long term, these changes result in biliary stasis, jaundice, cholangitis and cholelithiasis adding more to morbidity and even resulting in mortality (Figures 1 and 2). The superimposition of cholelithiasis observed in the setting of PD is very important since these patients are prone to secondary biliary cirrhosis, a complication observed in 4% of patients[7]. The clinical problem of cholelithiasis observed in chronic, non-cirrhotic PVCT patients is an under-mentioned topic and forms the basis of this compact review. Other clinical problems such as cirrhotic patients, biliary strictures or surgical management related to PD are beyond the scope of this paper.

Figure 1
Figure 1 Liver ultrasound image showing stone (white arrow) and portal vein cavernomatous transformation (black arrow) in gallbladder.
Figure 2
Figure 2 “Portal double ductopathy” sign with stones. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography image of a patient with chronic portal vein cavernomatous transformation showing irregular pancreatic duct and biliary ducts (black arrows). Main bile duct shows local stricture and dilations with cholelithiasis (white arrow).
PATHOGENESIS OF CHOLELITHIASIS IN PORTAL VEIN CAVERNOMATOUS TRANSFORMATION

Theoretically, cholelithiasis in the setting of PD and PVCT may be secondary to chronic cholestasis, changes in the constituents of bile or other factors such as reduced portal flow and associated liver atrophy.

Cholestasis and gallbladder functions

Cholestasis and related clinical findings such as jaundice, pruritus and cholangitis are the most common presenting symptoms in the setting of symptomatic PD and occurs in 5%-30% of all patients[8,9]. Chronic biliary stasis (due to compression in the biliary outflow and loss of bile duct contractility due to either fibrosis or ischemia[8]) may eventually result in stones formed de novo located in biliary ducts and/or gallbladder. The evidence for the proof of this hypothesis is obtained from clinical studies which generally observed pigment stones, located just proximal to the site of ductular stenosis without associated stones in the gallbladder[10,11]. The reduced contractile function of the gallbladder may also contribute to development of stones due to the presence of varicose veins in the gallbladder wall, but in one study the contractile function of gallbladder has been found to be unchanged[12]. Thus, cholestasis is believed to develop at later stages of PD secondary to fibrosis and compression of newly formed vessels, which are a major factors for development of stones. Once formed, stones further contribute to cholestasis and stricture formation by initiating recurrent cholangitis attacks.

Change in the constituents of bile

There is a small amount of evidence in the literature to indicate a change in the composition of bile resulting in a tendency for development of cholelithiasis. Previous studies investigating the contribution of reduced portal flow for development of cholelithiasis found that there is an increased tendency towards formation of stones after selective portal vein ligation in dogs[13]. Also, temporary interruption of portal flow leads to decreased bile acid synthesis and biliary flow[14]. There is no human study in the literature to indicate definitive changes in biliary composition take place during PVCT. Hypothetically speaking, presence of abnormal portal inflow might contribute to formation of lithogenic bile either by causing hypersplenism and increased pigment load in bile or abnormal enterohepatic circulation of bile acids due to portal hypertension.

FREQUENCY AND CLINICAL FINDINGS OF CHOLELITHIASIS IN PORTAL VEIN CAVERNOMATOUS TRANSFORMATION

The findings obtained from key studies concerning cholelithiasis observed in PVT-PVCT (in adult and pediatric populations) are summarized in Table 1. The frequency of cholelithiasis is highly variable (0%-84%). Probably, this variability is secondary to the problem of potential bias in patient selection criteria. Most of the studies only included patients with symptoms in a retrospective design or included patients with chronic liver disease-cirrhosis or with mass-occupying lesions. In most of these studies, investigation methods [endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography or ultrasound] were not uniform so it was not possible to make a definitive conclusion about incidence and prevalence of stones. The choice of investigation method has been found to have a clear impact on the results of anatomical location of cholelithiasis found in the biliary system. Therefore, current literature lacks prospective and well-designed studies to reveal the exact prevalence and incidence of cholelithiasis in a group of well selected PVCT patients irrespective of presence of symptoms.

Table 1 Cholelithiasis and important findings from selected studies.
AuthorPatient populationFrequency and location of cholelithiasis (%)Notes
Bayraktar et al[1]47 PVT patients evaluated by ERCP8 (19) located in CBDUnselected PVCT patients irrespective of symptoms, had a control group of 22 patients with other causes of portal hypertension
Condat et al[11]25 consecutive patients in 2 yr evaluated by MRCP4 (16)Cholelithiasis associated with abrupt elevation of transaminase level, obstructive jaundice and cholangitis (2 patients)
Khare et al[27]13 patients with obstructive jaundice evaluated by ultrasound4 (31) located in GB, 4 (31) located in CBDRetrospective selection of patients with obstructive jaundice
Sezgin et al[19]10 consecutive patients in 6 yr presenting with jaundice and/or cholangitis evaluated by ERCP0Only patients with biliary symptoms are evaluated; Total number of patients or prevalence of cholelithiasis is not mentioned
Oo et al[16]13 patients with symptoms related to PD in 13 yr11 (84) located in GB, 9 (69) located both in GB and CBDSymptomatic patients selected
Dumortier et al[28]6 consecutive patients presented as case series4 (66) located in GB, 2 also had stones in CBDUpon follow up 3 patients suffered from cholecystitis and cholangitis requiring cholecystectomy
Chaudhary et al[20]9 symptomatic PD patients managed surgically2 (22) located in CBDSelected patients with indications for surgery; Bile aspirates during surgery revealed Escherichia coli in patients with stones
Agarwal et al[29]39 symptomatic PD patients managed surgically12 (30) located in GB, 7 (18) located in CBDSelected patients with indications for surgery
Dhiman et al[17]53 symptomatic and asymptomatic patients11 (20) (7 located in GB while 4 in CBD)Stones were found more frequently in patients with symptoms than asymptomatic patients
Ozkavukcu et al[30]16 patients diagnosed with PVT evaluated by MRCP0 (there are 3 patients with history of cholecystectomy but the reasons are not given)Patients with history of, chronic liver diseases, liver abcess and hydatid cyst were not eliminated with potential interference with findings of biliary system
Chiu et al[31]29 children with PVT diagnosis evaluated for Rex shunt5 (17) located in GB, 4 (14) had biliary sludgeOnly children evaluated for possible surgery included
Yamada et al[32]21 children with PVT3 (14) located in GB21 patients selected out of 35, selection criteria not mentioned

The clinical findings related to cholelithiasis in PVCT patients are not different from patients who do not have PVCT, but it is evident that it results in a high frequency of PD symptoms. Cholelithiasis is found more commonly in patients with biliary findings such as jaundice, biliary colic, cholangitis and elevated liver enzymes compared with asymptomatic patients[7,15].

TREATMENT

The management of stones in patients with PVCT merits special attention since concomitant changes in the biliary system may jeopardize standard therapeutic procedures. The collaterals of Petren and Saint around major bile ducts enlarge in response to PVCT and they form the basis of collateral vessel compression to major bile ducts in PD[6,7]. Also, secondary to ischemic injury and development of fibrous tissue in the major biliary ducts, biliary interventions should be performed with caution. Since these varicose collaterals and fibrous strictures may result in detrimental complications like hemobilia or recurrent cholangitis, clinicians should follow special management strategies being aware of these potential risks. Otherwise, therapeutic strategies for cholelithiasis in PD are not different from other patient groups.

In previous studies focusing on treatment of PD, the major concern and attention was given to the problem of biliary strictures. The treatment of strictures and associated cholestasis is important since resolving these factors also reduces the risk of formation or recurrence of cholelithiasis. Biliary stricture and associated jaundice can be managed by medical treatment with ursodeoxycholic acid[11,16] or by interventions like biliary stenting[16-18], balloon dilatation[19] or portosystemic shunting[20]. If present, cholelithiasis should first be managed by evaluation of varicose veins around the common bile duct, either by magnetic resonance angiography or endoscopic ultrasonography[17]. After elimination of varicose veins, standard sphincterotomy and balloon trawl for extraction of common bile duct stones and/or sludge should be employed[10]. The presence of any collateral varicose vein is very important since inadvertent interventions like basket removal of stones or biliary stenting might result in bothersome hemobilia[21-25] requiring massive transfusions, injection sclerotherapy[26], terlipressin[25] or urgent portosystemic shunting[21] . In our personal experience, we propose that papillotomy should be performed at earlier stages of disease as a prophylactic measure to make future ERCP procedures safer and easier. If not performed earlier, varices and fibrosis in the distal main bile duct can preclude or complicate safe papillotomy.

In conclusion, cholelithiasis and choledocholithiasis in the setting of PVCT and PD is a specific problem that needs special attention. Stones can become very problematic and interventions may result in severe hemobilia. Stone extraction by balloon or basket trawl can be gruelling due to strictures and fibrosis in biliary system. If present, biliary strictures and severe vascular compression should be treated by medical or interventional treatments in order to facilitate stone extraction and reduce recurrence. Further well designed prospective studies are required to clearly understand the exact natural history of cholelithiasis in PVCT patients.

Footnotes

Peer reviewer: Hongjoo Kim, Professor, Sungkyunkwan Uni-versity Kangbuk Samsung Hospital, 108, Pyung-Dong, Jongro-Ku, Seoul 110-746, South Korea

S- Editor Gou SX L- Editor O’Neill M E- Editor Li JY

References
1.  Bayraktar Y, Balkanci F, Kayhan B, Ozenç A, Arslan S, Telatar H. Bile duct varices or "pseudo-cholangiocarcinoma sign" in portal hypertension due to cavernous transformation of the portal vein. Am J Gastroenterol. 1992;87:1801-1806.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
2.  Egesel T, Unsal I, Dikmen G, Bayraktar Y. The assessment of pancreatic exocrine function by bentiromide test in patients with chronic portal vein thrombosis. Pancreas. 2002;25:355-359.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
3.  Bayraktar Y, Balkanci F, Ozenc A, Arslan S, Koseoglu T, Ozdemir A, Uzunalimoglu B, Telatar H, Gurakar A, Van Thiel DH. The "pseudo-cholangiocarcinoma sign" in patients with cavernous transformation of the portal vein and its effect on the serum alkaline phosphatase and bilirubin levels. Am J Gastroenterol. 1995;90:2015-2019.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
4.  Bayraktar Y, Harmanci O, Ersoy O, Aydinli M, Balkanci F. "Portal double ductopathy sign" in patients with portal vein cavernous transformation. Hepatogastroenterology. 2008;55:1193-1200.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
5.  de Franchis R. Revising consensus in portal hypertension: report of the Baveno V consensus workshop on methodology of diagnosis and therapy in portal hypertension. J Hepatol. 2010;53:762-768.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 982]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 771]  [Article Influence: 89.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
6.  Bayraktar Y. Portal ductopathy: clinical importance and nomenclature. World J Gastroenterol. 2011;17:1410-1415.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in CrossRef: 14]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 11]  [Article Influence: 1.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
7.  Chandra R, Kapoor D, Tharakan A, Chaudhary A, Sarin SK. Portal biliopathy. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2001;16:1086-1092.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 124]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 94]  [Article Influence: 6.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
8.  Dilawari JB, Chawla YK. Pseudosclerosing cholangitis in extrahepatic portal venous obstruction. Gut. 1992;33:272-276.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 111]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 97]  [Article Influence: 3.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
9.  Khuroo MS, Yattoo GN, Zargar SA, Javid G, Dar MY, Khan BA, Boda MI. Biliary abnormalities associated with extrahepatic portal venous obstruction. Hepatology. 1993;17:807-813.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 141]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 73]  [Article Influence: 5.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
10.  Bhatia V, Jain AK, Sarin SK. Choledocholithiasis associated with portal biliopathy in patients with extrahepatic portal vein obstruction: management with endoscopic sphincterotomy. Gastrointest Endosc. 1995;42:178-181.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 27]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 16]  [Article Influence: 1.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
11.  Condat B, Vilgrain V, Asselah T, O'Toole D, Rufat P, Zappa M, Moreau R, Valla D. Portal cavernoma-associated cholangiopathy: a clinical and MR cholangiography coupled with MR portography imaging study. Hepatology. 2003;37:1302-1308.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 139]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 102]  [Article Influence: 7.7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
12.  Dhiman RK, Sharma , A . L.A., Kohli, K.K., Chawla, Y. Effect of portal biliopathy and gallbladder varices on gallbladder motility and bile lithogenicity in patients with extrahepatic portal venous obstruction. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2004;19:A676-A868.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 2]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 3]  [Article Influence: 0.1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
13.  Eto T. Gallstone formation in dogs after selective occlusion of the portal vein branches. Jpn J Surg. 1988;18:268-275.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 7]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 4]  [Article Influence: 0.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
14.  Adachi Y, Kamisako T, Yamamoto T. The effects of temporary occlusion of the superior mesenteric vein or splenic vein on biliary bilirubin and bile acid excretion in rats. J Lab Clin Med. 1991;118:261-268.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
15.  Dhiman RK, Chawla Y, Duseja A, Chhetri D, Dilawari J. Portal hypertensive biliopathy (PHB) in patients with extrahepatic portal venous obstruction (EHPVO). J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2006;21:A220-A234.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
16.  Oo YH, Olliff S, Haydon G, Thorburn D. Symptomatic portal biliopathy: a single centre experience from the UK. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2009;21:206-213.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 37]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 13]  [Article Influence: 3.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
17.  Dhiman RK, Behera A, Chawla YK, Dilawari JB, Suri S. Portal hypertensive biliopathy. Gut. 2007;56:1001-1008.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 108]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 85]  [Article Influence: 7.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
18.  Rosenthal MD, White GH, Stephen MS, Gallagher JJ, Sandroussi C. Vascular biliopathy as a cause of common bile duct obstruction successfully treated by mesocaval shunt and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography biliary stent placement. Vascular. 2008;16:356-358.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 13]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 9]  [Article Influence: 1.1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
19.  Sezgin O, Oğuz D, Altintaş E, Saritaş U, Sahin B. Endoscopic management of biliary obstruction caused by cavernous transformation of the portal vein. Gastrointest Endosc. 2003;58:602-608.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 46]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 24]  [Article Influence: 2.6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
20.  Chaudhary A, Dhar P, Sarin SK, Sachdev A, Agarwal AK, Vij JC, Broor SL. Bile duct obstruction due to portal biliopathy in extrahepatic portal hypertension: surgical management. Br J Surg. 1998;85:326-329.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 99]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 86]  [Article Influence: 4.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
21.  Mutignani M, Shah SK, Bruni A, Perri V, Costamagna G. Endoscopic treatment of extrahepatic bile duct strictures in patients with portal biliopathy carries a high risk of haemobilia: report of 3 cases. Dig Liver Dis. 2002;34:587-591.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 38]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 19]  [Article Influence: 2.1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
22.  Tighe M, Jacobson I. Bleeding from bile duct varices: an unexpected hazard during therapeutic ERCP. Gastrointest Endosc. 1996;43:250-252.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 24]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 12]  [Article Influence: 1.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
23.  Sharma M, Ponnusamy RP. Is balloon sweeping detrimental in portal biliopathy? A report of 3 cases. Gastrointest Endosc. 2009;70:171-173.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 20]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 15]  [Article Influence: 1.7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
24.  Sharma M, Babu CS, Dhiman RK, Chawla Y. Induced hypotension in the management of acute hemobilia during therapeutic ERCP in a patient with portal biliopathy (with videos). Gastrointest Endosc. 2010;72:1317-1319.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 11]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 10]  [Article Influence: 1.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
25.  Tyagi P, Sachdeva S, Agarwal AK, Puri AS. Terlipressin in control of acute hemobilia during therapeutic ERCP in patient with portal biliopathy. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2009;19:e198-e201.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 2]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 1]  [Article Influence: 0.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
26.  Ito T, Segawa T, Kanematsu T. Successful endoscopic injection sclerotherapy for bleeding from bile duct varices. Surg Today. 1997;27:174-176.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 8]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 6]  [Article Influence: 0.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
27.  Khare R, Sikora SS, Srikanth G, Choudhuri G, Saraswat VA, Kumar A, Saxena R, Kapoor VK. Extrahepatic portal venous obstruction and obstructive jaundice: approach to management. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2005;20:56-61.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 34]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 29]  [Article Influence: 2.1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
28.  Dumortier J, Vaillant E, Boillot O, Poncet G, Henry L, Scoazec JY, Partensky C, Valette PJ, Paliard P, Ponchon T. Diagnosis and treatment of biliary obstruction caused by portal cavernoma. Endoscopy. 2003;35:446-450.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 31]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 28]  [Article Influence: 1.7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
29.  Agarwal AK, Sharma D, Singh S, Agarwal S, Girish SP. Portal biliopathy: a study of 39 surgically treated patients. HPB (Oxford). 2011;13:33-39.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 40]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 31]  [Article Influence: 4.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
30.  Ozkavukcu E, Erden A, Erden I. Imaging features of portal biliopathy: frequency of involvement patterns with emphasis on MRCP. Eur J Radiol. 2009;71:129-134.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 21]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 16]  [Article Influence: 1.6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
31.  Chiu B, Superina R. Extrahepatic portal vein thrombosis is associated with an increased incidence of cholelithiasis. J Pediatr Surg. 2004;39:1059-1061.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 19]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 16]  [Article Influence: 1.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
32.  Yamada RM, Hessel G. Ultrasonographic assessment of the gallbladder in 21 children with portal vein thrombosis. Pediatr Radiol. 2005;35:290-294.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 5]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 4]  [Article Influence: 0.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]