No evidence demonstrating hepatotoxicity associated with hydroxycitric acid

Abstract

Although a number of cases of hepatotoxicity are associated with the use of Hydroxycut weight management products, it has been alleged that their effects are primarily due to the presence of hydroxycitric acid (HCA, as Super CitriMax) in the formulations. However, while these products contain up to 20 different ingredients, some do not contain HCA. Case studies reported to date have not considered in depth the literature on the numerous animal and human studies that have been conducted on the safety and efficacy of HCA. No HCA-associated hepatotoxicity or treatment-related adverse effects have been reported in these studies, and thus it is premature to make the assumptions presented in the recent case studies regarding Hydroxycut. If it is established in well controlled studies that the use of these formulations with and/or without HCA can result in the occurrence or progression of hepatotoxicity, additional studies should be conducted to characterize the causative factor(s).

Key Words: Hydroxycitric acid, Super CitriMax, Hydroxycitric acid-SX, Garcinia cambogia, Hydroxycut, Liver failure, Hepatotoxicity, Safety and efficacy

TO THE EDITOR

In the Letter to the Editor by Lobb[1], the author has hypothesized that the putative hepatotoxicity of the dietary supplement, Hydroxycut, may be due to one of its components, namely hydroxycitric acid (HCA)derived from Garcinia cambogia. However, it is important to note that, of the 14 different formulations of Hydroxycut that have been marketed, only 8 contain HCA. In general, these products are cocktails containing up to 20 different ingredients. In the case studies cited by the author[1], information is not provided regarding the specific Hydroxycut products that were used in each of the case reports. This is of concern given that of the numerous ingredients present in these products, no specific reason was given for identifying HCA as the putative hepatotoxic agent other than as the possible hepatotoxic agent in some of the previous case reports. Because of the name of this product line, it is understandable that a possible word association might be made with HCA. Can the reported hepatotoxicity of these products (assuming it is correct) be attributed to an ingredient or combination of ingredients? No information or discussion was presented regarding the potential hepatotoxicity of any of the other ingredients or combinations of ingredients, and it is distracting to make inferences without sound research support.

The importance of the issues raised above is underscored by the numerous animal[2–8] and human[59–12] studies on the safety and efficacy of HCA (as Super CitriMax, HCA-SX). Regrettably, none of these studies was referenced and discussed by the author of this Letter to the Editor[1]. In experimental animal studies at up to 25X the human equivalency dose of HCA, no reports are available on hepatotoxicity or other adverse effects. A HCA dose of 2500 mg/kg, equivalent to 150 000 mg in a 60 kg individual, had no adverse effect in the tested animals[2–4].

Soni et al[5] have summarized the results of 15 HCA human clinical studies, 14 of them were double blind and placebo controlled, and one was a single arm, open trial. No treatment-related adverse effects have been reported in any of these studies. These authors concluded that HCA at a level up to 2800 mg/d is safe for human consumption. The combined data strongly suggest that HCA itself is not the culprit with respect to the case studies reporting hepatotoxicity associated with Hydroxycut use. In the Health Hazard Report on Hydroxycut by Mozersky et al[13], the Board noted that it did not know what ingredient(s) present in these products can cause hepatotoxicity, assuming the products are indeed the causative agents. More studies are needed before a definitive conclusion can be made.

Interestingly, several animal studies have suggested that HCA may have hepatoprotective[1415] and chemoprotective[16] properties. In addition, Kaats[17] has recently conducted a 60-d study on 25 human subjects using a product containing 4600 mg/d of HCA. The results showed no evidence of adverse effects and indicated hepatoprotection based on decreasing values for the hepatic enzymes, aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and alanine aminotransferase (ALT).

It should be noted that the dried fruit of Garcinia cambogia, a source of HCA, has been consumed for centuries throughout Southeast Asia[18] and is in the USDA’s list of Perennial Edible Fruits[19]. Consistent with the above findings, HCA (as Super CitriMax) has been generally recognized as safe (GRAS) by the Burdock Group, one of the nation’s leading food ingredient safety and toxicology groups.

Finally, a key issue that was not discussed by Lobb[1] is the possibility that other co-consumed substances, such as acetaminophen, alcohol, or a wide range of prescription drugs, may have been responsible for the hepatotoxicity. The referenced case study by Shim and Saab[20] does in fact note that acetaminophen was consumed along with aspirin. Acetaminophen toxicity is the leading cause for calls to Poison Control Centers in the United States and results in almost 500 deaths annually due to acute liver failure[21].

There is no question that issues exist with respect to the regulation, quality control, and appropriate safety and efficacy studies of supplements, just as there are issues with numerous drugs, including acetaminophen, that cause extensive morbidity and mortality.

However, to point an accusatory finger at an ingredient that has been extensively studied and for which no adverse effects have been reported in animal and human studies, is counterproductive.

Given the widespread use of dietary supplements in the USA as well as in other countries, it is imperative that sound science should be used in the evaluation of the potential negative as well as the positive effects of these products. With respect to the potential negative effects of some of these products, an important step forward in this regard is the current requirement for adverse event reporting. However, it is important to note that these reports typically reflect the associations, rather than the clear-cut cases of causality. When the associations are noted, they should be rigorously examined, and if the supplements are found to be the causative factors for the pathology reported, the true agents need to be firmly identified, along with the dose at which the negative effects are induced.