Copyright
©2006 Baishideng Publishing Group Co.
World J Gastroenterol. Oct 14, 2006; 12(38): 6161-6166
Published online Oct 14, 2006. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v12.i38.6161
Published online Oct 14, 2006. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v12.i38.6161
Table 5 Comparison of the tolerance variables in the four groups n (%)
| Side effect | Group 1 | Group 2 | Group 3 | Group 4 | P |
| Nausea | 17 (39.5) | 24 (53.3) | 24 (53.3) | 15 (34.1) | NS |
| Vomiting | 4 (9.3) | 10 (22.2) | 10 (22.2) | 8 (18.2) | NS |
| Disgusting1 | 10 (23.3) | 12 (26.7) | 12 (26.7) | 12 (27.3) | NS |
| Thirst1 | 6 (13.9) | 9 (20.0) | 9 (20) | 12 (27.2) | NS |
| Abdominal pain1 | 4 (9.3) | 4 (8.9) | 3 (6.6) | 5 (11.4) | NS |
| Anal pain1 | 1 (2.3) | 4 (8.9) | 1 (2.2) | 2 (4.5) | NS |
- Citation: Parra-Blanco A, Nicolás-Pérez D, Gimeno-García A, Grosso B, Jiménez A, Ortega J, Quintero E. The timing of bowel preparation before colonoscopy determines the quality of cleansing, and is a significant factor contributing to the detection of flat lesions: A randomized study. World J Gastroenterol 2006; 12(38): 6161-6166
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v12/i38/6161.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v12.i38.6161