Brief Reports Open Access
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2005. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.
World J Gastroenterol. Aug 7, 2005; 11(29): 4604-4606
Published online Aug 7, 2005. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v11.i29.4604
Alterations of serum cholinesterase in patients with gastric cancer
Shan-Zhi Gu, Xin-Han Zhao, Ping Quan, Sheng-Bin Li, Key Laboratory of Environment and Genes Related to Diseases of Ministry of Education , Medical College of Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an 710061, Shaanxi Province, China
Bo-Rong Pan, Department of Oncology, Xijing Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi’an 710032, Shaanxi Province, China
Author contributions: All authors contributed equally to the work.
Correspondence to: Xin-Han Zhao, Key Laboratory of Environment and Genes Related to Diseases of Ministry of Education, Department of Medical Oncology, First Hospital of Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an 710061, Shaanxi Province, China. zhxinhan@pub.xaonline.com
Telephone: +86-29-85324136 Fax:+86-29-82655472
Received: October 9, 2004
Revised: November 23, 2004
Accepted: November 26, 2004
Published online: August 7, 2005

Abstract

AIM: To understand the correlation of serum cholinesterase (CHE) activity with gastric cancer and to assess their clinical significance.

METHODS: The velocity method was adopted to detect the activity of serum CHE in patients with gastric cancer and in patients with non-malignant tumor as controls.

RESULTS: The serum CHE activity in the treatment group was significantly lower than that in the control group with a very significant difference between the two groups (83.3:113.1,P = 0.0003). Age was significantly associated with the incidence of gastric caner.

CONCLUSION: Serum CHE activity has a close relation with the incidence of gastric cancer.

Key Words: Cholinesterase activity, Gastric cancer



INTRODUCTION

CHE is a type of glycoprotein[1-4], existing in vivo in multiple forms of isozyme[5-7]. The decrease of serum CHE activity is often observed in patients with organic phosphorus poisoning[8] and damage of parenchymal cells[9-12]. In clinical practice, we have discovered that there is a decrease of serum CHE activity in patients with gastric cancer. This study aimed to detect the serum CHE activity in patients with gastric cancer, and to observe the correlation of serum CHE activity with the incidence of gastric cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS
Subjects

The treatment group included 81 patients (61 males and 20 females aged 30-80 years with an average age of 58.8±12.0 years) with gastric cancer hospitalized from January 1998 to June 2002. The disease was confirmed by gastroscopic examination and/or pathological examination. Clinical and pathologic classifications followed the General Rules for Gastric Cancer Study in Surgery and Pathology in Japan. The control group included 80 patients (44 males and 36 females) with non-malignant tumor hospitalized during the same period. Their age ranged 26-86 years with an average age of 57.7±15.3 years. Patients with organic phosphorus poisoning or damage of parenchymal cells were excluded.

Methods

All the patients were fasted for more than 12 h, then venous blood was taken. After centrifugation, serum was subjected to detection on the same day. Serum CHE activity was measured by the velocity method with Hitachi 7170 full automatic biochemical instrument and Hitachi 7170 special reagent. The normal reference value was 75-217 μkat/L.

Statistical analysis

All the data were fed into a computer. The SPSS10.0 software package was employed for analysis and processing. The chi-square test was conducted. With the CHE difference between the gastric cancer group and the control group, F test was adopted. For the purpose of reviewing the relation between sex, age and CHE, the multi-factor regression analysis was conducted with respect to the above three factors. The statistical significance level was defined as <0.05 with two-sided detection.

RESULTS
Serum CHE activity in gastric cancer

The age of the gastric cancer group and control group both expressed abnormal distribution with the mid-value being 60.5 and 61.5 years respectively. The χ2 was performed (χ2 = 22.265, P = 0.0002), suggesting that the age distribution in the two groups was overbalanced. The result from the χ2 detection for the sex distribution was χ2 = 25.138 and P = 0.0003, showing that the sex distribution in the two groups was out of balance as well. Tables 1 and 2 respectively show the co-variance analysis results.

Table 1 Serum CHE distribution in gastric cancer patients (μkat/L).
SexGroupnAverageStandard error95%Cl
Lower limitUpper limit
MaleGastric cancer6181.631.577.286.1
Control44114.830.8108.9120.6
FemaleGastric cancer208534.576.293.9
Control36111.425.8106.2116.7
Figure 1
Figure 1 Different CHE levels in gastric cancer patients.
Table 2 Covariance analysis results of CHE in gastric cancer patients and controls.
SexVariation sourceDfMean square rootFP
MaleWithin group1849 712 857.157256.7180.000
Age (yr)46 116 906.47118.4810.000
Between groups1261 709 135.86279.0690.000
Error793 309 902.711
Total85
FemaleWithin group193 519 230.73329.8840.000
Age (yr)3732 546.50616.3720.000
Between groups13 129 425.45354.0810.000
Error61430 763.233
Total66

The age and nature of gastric cancer patients had a linear correlation with the CHE level (r = 0.8, P = 0.031), suggesting that the difference in CHE level between gastric cancer patients and controls was significant (F = 79.069, P = 0.0004). The serum CHE level of gastric cancer patients (81.6±31.5 μkat/L) was significantly lower than that in the control group (114.8±30.8 μkat/L), indicating that age was also an important factor affecting the incidence of gastric cancer (F = 18.481, P = 0.0003).

With the age distribution, χ2 was performed (χ2 = 5.281, P = 0.383), showing that the age was evenly distributed. In gastric cancer patients and controls, CHE had a normal distribution and the variance was in order. Therefore, single-factor variance analysis could be made. The average value, standard deviation and single-factor variance are listed in Tables 1 and 2.

The difference in CHE levels of the two groups was significant (F = 29.884, P = 0.0006). The serum CHE level in gastric cancer patients (85.0±34.5 μkat/L) was significantly lower than that in the control group (111.4±25.8 μkat/L, Figure 1).

Multi-factor logistic regressive analysis

The three variables (sex, age, and CHE) were put into the Logistic model. After being fitted with the backward method, the final model was expressed (Table 3). The factors put into the model were only sex and CHE. The adaptive regressive equation was P (1) = 1/[1+e-(0.129)+2.542X1+1.006X3] or CHE = 12.701. Therefore, after removing the influence of other factors, the reduction of the CHE activity was a dangerous factor for gastric cancer.

Table 3 The Logistic analysis of sex and CHE.
VariableBSEWalddfSig.Exp (B)95.0 (%) CI for exp (B)
LowerUpper
Sex1.0660.23420.825102.9051.8374.592
CHE2.5420.31366.1311012.7016.88324.435
Constant16.1290.69777.303100.002
DISCUSSION

Cholinesterase can be divided into true cholinesterase (acetylcholinesterase, ACHE) and pseudocholinesterase (PCHE). ACHE exists mainly in the vesicles of cholinergic nerve peripheral synapse where there is a comparatively large amount of ACHE in the folding of the terminal synapse back membranes. It also exists in the cholinergic neurons[13,14], red cells[15], sera[16], livers[17], kidneys[18], intestines, white mass of brain[19], etc. In the activity center on the surface of the molecules of CHE protein, there are two places to be combined with acetylcholine, namely the anion place with negative charges and the place with ester decomposition. The place with ester decomposition has an acidic action point formed by serine hydroxide and an alkaline action point formed by histidine imidazole ring. They are combined by means of hydrogen bonds. PCHE reduces when the parenchymal cells are damaged, as the liver synthesizes PCHE[20-22]. Organophosphorus toxicant is a powerful inhibitor of ACHE and PCHE[23-26]. Measuring serum CHE activity can help diagnose organophosphorus poisoning and evaluate the condition after recovery. The results of this experiment indicate that human serum CHE activity has a significant correlation with gastric cancer.

Anic et al[27] discovered that the serum CHE activity in hepatitis B patients is relatively low. Khan et al[28] detected serum CHE and lactic dehydrogenase (LDH) activity in 40 cases of mammary cancer patients, 25 cases of benign tumor patients and 30 cases of healthy persons, and found that there is a significant difference in serum CHE activity between malignant and benign tumor patients.

If the ratio between CHE activity and serum CHE activity is less than 0.42, the malignant source should be considered[29]. A number of studies have been conducted on the relation between serum CHE activity and acute leukemia and cervical cancer[30,31].

Among the 81 cases of gastric cancer in the present study, there were 39 cases(48.2%) whose serum CHE activity was less than 75.0 μkat/L. Among the 80 cases of controls, there were only five cases (6.3%) whose serum CHE activity was less than 50.0 μkat/L. In the gastric cancer group, there were 14 cases whose serum CHE activity was less than 75.0 μkat/L. However, in the control group, there were no such cases. The results suggest that if a patient with gastric pathological changes whose serum CHE activity is less than 50.0 μkat/L, sharp vigilance on the existence of gastric cancer should be maintained after organophosphorous poisoning and damages of parenchymal cells, etc., are excluded.

In conclusion, the determination of serum CHE activity is a rapid, simple, convenient, inexpensive and reliable method to diagnose gastric cancer. Its exact mechanism remains to be further explored.

Footnotes

Co-first-authors: Shan-Zhi Gu and Xin-Han Zhao

Science Editor Wang XL and Guo SY Language Editor Elsevier HK

References
1.  Fukumoto H, Tennis M, Locascio JJ, Hyman BT, Growdon JH, Irizarry MC. Age but not diagnosis is the main predictor of plasma amyloid beta-protein levels. Arch Neurol. 2003;60:958-964.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 174]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 191]  [Article Influence: 9.1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
2.  Luo ZB, Xu CP, Wang D, Wang G, Xiao SQ, Zhu GY, Fang DC. Immunotherapy of dendritic cells andits exosomes transfected with mRNA of gastric cancer cells in tumor-carriedmice. World Chin J Digestol. 2004;12:9-12.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
3.  Valbonesi P, Sartor G, Fabbri E. Characterization of cholinesterase activity in three bivalves inhabiting the North Adriatic sea and their possible use as sentinel organisms for biosurveillance programmes. Sci Total Environ. 2003;312:79-88.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 71]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 23]  [Article Influence: 1.1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
4.  Pelizzi N, Puccini P, Riccardi B, Acerbi D, Catinella S. Characterization of Ganstigmine metabolites in hepatocytes by low- and high-resolution mass spectrometry coupled with liquid chromatography. Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom. 2003;17:1691-1698.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 5]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 3]  [Article Influence: 0.1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
5.  Sagi Y, Weinstock M, Youdim MB. Attenuation of MPTP-induced dopaminergic neurotoxicity by TV3326, a cholinesterase-monoamine oxidase inhibitor. J Neurochem. 2003;86:290-297.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 40]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 41]  [Article Influence: 2.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
6.  Luo ZB, Xu CP, Zhu GY, Zhang PB, Guo CH, Luo YH, Fang DC, Luo CJ. Immunotherapy of dendritic cells transfected with mRNA of gastric cancer cells in carried-tumor mice. World Chin J Digestol. 2004;12:13-15.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
7.  Marco JL, Carreiras MC. Recent developments in the synthesis of acetylcholinesterase inhibitors. Mini Rev Med Chem. 2003;3:518-524.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 40]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 40]  [Article Influence: 1.9]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
8.  Pascuzzi RM. The edrophonium test. Semin Neurol. 2003;23:83-88.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 52]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 53]  [Article Influence: 2.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
9.  Xin SJ, Zhang LX, Zhu CL, Hu JH, Duan XZ, You SL, Hu LP, Zou ZS, Mao YL, Huangpu YS. Correlation of clinical features with pathology in chronic viral hepatitis. Zhonghua ShiYan He LinChuang BingDuXue ZaZhi. 2003;17:88-90.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
10.  Pepin JL, Myressiotis S, Ceulemans S. Prevention of dementia: is it possible? Rev Med Liege. 2003;58:220-224.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
11.  Androne AS, Hryniewicz K, Goldsmith R, Arwady A, Katz SD. Acetylcholinesterase inhibition with pyridostigmine improves heart rate recovery after maximal exercise in patients with chronic heart failure. Heart. 2003;89:854-858.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 47]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 48]  [Article Influence: 2.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
12.  Migliaccio-Walle K, Getsios D, Caro JJ, Ishak KJ, O'Brien JA, Papadopoulos G. Economic evaluation of galantamine in the treatment of mild to moderate Alzheimer's disease in the United States. Clin Ther. 2003;25:1806-1825.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 34]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 37]  [Article Influence: 1.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
13.  Grossberg G, Irwin P, Satlin A, Mesenbrink P, Spiegel R. Rivastigmine in Alzheimer disease: efficacy over two years. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2004;12:420-431.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 6]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 13]  [Article Influence: 0.7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
14.  Loewenstein DA, Acevedo A, Czaja SJ, Duara R. Cognitive rehabilitation of mildly impaired Alzheimer disease patients on cholinesterase inhibitors. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2004;12:395-402.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 38]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 62]  [Article Influence: 3.1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
15.  Darvesh S, Arora RC, Martin E, Magee D, Hopkins DA, Armour JA. Cholinesterase inhibitors modify the activity of intrinsic cardiac neurons. Exp Neurol. 2004;188:461-470.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 14]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 14]  [Article Influence: 0.7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
16.  Zdrazilová P, Stepánková S, Komers K, Ventura K, Cegan A. Half-inhibition concentrations of new cholinesterase inhibitors. Z Naturforsch C. 2004;59:293-296.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
17.  van Dyck CH. Understanding the latest advances in pharmacologic interventions for Alzheimer's disease. CNS Spectr. 2004;9:24-28.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
18.  Eskenazi B, Harley K, Bradman A, Weltzien E, Jewell NP, Barr DB, Furlong CE, Holland NT. Association of in utero organophosphate pesticide exposure and fetal growth and length of gestation in an agricultural population. Environ Health Perspect. 2004;112:1116-1124.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 356]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 225]  [Article Influence: 11.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
19.  Arai H. Current therapies in dementia. Nihon Ronen Igakkai Zasshi. 2004;41:310-313.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 3]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 4]  [Article Influence: 0.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
20.  Kurz A, Van Baelen B. Ginkgo biloba compared with cholinesterase inhibitors in the treatment of dementia: a review based on meta-analyses by the cochrane collaboration. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord. 2004;18:217-226.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 34]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 36]  [Article Influence: 1.9]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
21.  Fu G, Wang GB, Lu XM, Huang QX, Zheng H. MAPK signal transduction and apoptosisof human gastric carcinoma cells induced by liposomes of survivin antisense oligonucleotide. World Chin J Digestol. 2004;12:1034-1039.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
22.  Khang P, Weintraub N, Espinoza RT. The use, benefits, and costs of cholinesterase inhibitors for Alzheimer's dementia in long-term care: are the data relevant and available? J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2004;5:249-255.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 8]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 7]  [Article Influence: 0.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
23.  Sormani MP, Oneto R, Bruno B, Fiorone M, Lamparelli T, Gualandi F, Raiola AM, Dominietto A, Van Lint MT, Frassoni F. A revised day +7 predictive score for transplant-related mortality: serum cholinesterase, total protein, blood urea nitrogen, gamma glutamyl transferase, donor type and cell dose. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2003;32:205-211.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 23]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 25]  [Article Influence: 1.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
24.  Lu CJ, Tune LE. Chronic exposure to anticholinergic medications adversely affects the course of Alzheimer disease. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2003;11:458-461.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 77]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 76]  [Article Influence: 3.6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
25.  Pang YP, Kollmeyer TM, Hong F, Lee JC, Hammond PI, Haugabouk SP, Brimijoin S. Rational design of alkylene-linked bis-pyridiniumaldoximes as improved acetylcholinesterase reactivators. Chem Biol. 2003;10:491-502.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 79]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 80]  [Article Influence: 3.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
26.  Tariot PN, Jakimovich L. Donepezil use for advanced Alzheimer's disease--a case study from a long-term care facility. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2003;4:216-219.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 3]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 3]  [Article Influence: 0.1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
27.  Anic K, Ivandic A, Volaric M, Peric L, Getto L, Bacun T. [Cholinesterase in the differential diagnosis of parenchymal and obstructive icterus and in the differentiation between malignant and benign obstruction]. Wien Med Wochenschr. 1999;149:355-358.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
28.  Khan SA, Stewart AK, Morrow M. Does aggressive local therapy improve survival in metastatic breast cancer? Surgery. 2002;132:620-626; discussion 620-626;.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 285]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 254]  [Article Influence: 11.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
29.  Cabello G, Juarranz A, Botella LM, Calaf GM. Organophosphorous pesticides in breast cancer progression. J Submicrosc Cytol Pathol. 2003;35:1-9.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
30.  Yi Z, Wang Z, Li H, Liu M. Inhibitory effect of tellimagrandin I on chemically induced differentiation of human leukemia K562 cells. Toxicol Lett. 2004;147:109-119.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 19]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 20]  [Article Influence: 1.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
31.  Bradamante V, Smigovec E, Buković D, Geber J, Matanić D. Plasma cholinesterase activity in patients with uterine cervical cancer during radiotherapy. Coll Antropol. 2000;24:373-380.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]