BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Cited by in F6Publishing
For: Huo ZC, Liu G, Li XY, Liu F, Fan WJ, Guan RH, Li PF, Mo DY, He YZ. Use of a disposable circumcision suture device versus conventional circumcision: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Asian J Androl 2017;19:362-7. [PMID: 26975486 DOI: 10.4103/1008-682X.174855] [Cited by in Crossref: 4] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 2] [Article Influence: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis]
Number Citing Articles
1 Jiang W, Fu JL, Guo WL, Yan ZC, Zheng RQ, Lu JR, Lai XD. A Modified Pressure Dressing to Avoid Severe Bleeding After Circumcision With a Disposable Circumcision Suture Device and a Discussion on the Mechanism of Bleeding With the Disposable Circumcision Suture Device. Sex Med 2021;9:100288. [PMID: 33765458 DOI: 10.1016/j.esxm.2020.100288] [Reference Citation Analysis]
2 Rao JM, Huang H, Chen T, Yang CG, Pan CZ, Deng GC, Shen LJ, Qian XH, Peng MK, Zhou HD, Peng HL. Modified Circumcision Using the Disposable Circumcision Suture Device in Children: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Urology 2020;143:206-11. [PMID: 32593627 DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2020.06.018] [Reference Citation Analysis]
3 Hohlfeld AS, Ebrahim S, Zaki Shaik M, Kredo T. Circumcision devices versus standard surgical techniques in adolescent and adult male circumcisions: a Cochrane review. BJU Int 2021. [PMID: 34587354 DOI: 10.1111/bju.15604] [Reference Citation Analysis]
4 Hohlfeld A, Ebrahim S, Shaik MZ, Kredo T. Circumcision devices versus standard surgical techniques in adolescent and adult male circumcisions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2021;3:CD012250. [PMID: 33786810 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD012250.pub2] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 1] [Reference Citation Analysis]