BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Cited by in F6Publishing
For: Komatsu S. Plant Proteomic Research 2.0: Trends and Perspectives. Int J Mol Sci 2019;20:E2495. [PMID: 31117165 DOI: 10.3390/ijms20102495] [Cited by in Crossref: 5] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 5] [Article Influence: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis]
Number Citing Articles
1 Halder T, Choudhary M, Liu H, Chen Y, Yan G, Siddique KHM. Wheat Proteomics for Abiotic Stress Tolerance and Root System Architecture: Current Status and Future Prospects. Proteomes 2022;10:17. [DOI: 10.3390/proteomes10020017] [Cited by in Crossref: 1] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 1] [Article Influence: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis]
2 Ahmad J, Ali AA, Iqbal M, Ahmad A, Qureshi MI. Proteomics of mercury-induced responses and resilience in plants: a review. Environ Chem Lett. [DOI: 10.1007/s10311-022-01388-y] [Cited by in Crossref: 1] [Article Influence: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis]
3 Smythers AL, Hicks LM. Mapping the plant proteome: tools for surveying coordinating pathways. Emerg Top Life Sci 2021;5:203-20. [PMID: 33620075 DOI: 10.1042/ETLS20200270] [Cited by in Crossref: 2] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 5] [Article Influence: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis]
4 Komatsu S, Jorrin-Novo JV. Plant Proteomic Research 3.0: Challenges and Perspectives. Int J Mol Sci 2021;22:E766. [PMID: 33466599 DOI: 10.3390/ijms22020766] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 2] [Reference Citation Analysis]
5 Wang X, Zenda T, Liu S, Liu G, Jin H, Dai L, Dong A, Yang Y, Duan H. Comparative Proteomics and Physiological Analyses Reveal Important Maize Filling-Kernel Drought-Responsive Genes and Metabolic Pathways. Int J Mol Sci 2019;20:E3743. [PMID: 31370198 DOI: 10.3390/ijms20153743] [Cited by in Crossref: 17] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 11] [Article Influence: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis]