BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Cited by in F6Publishing
For: Nakagawa Y, Sakuma T, Takeo T, Nakagata N, Yamamoto T. Electroporation-mediated genome editing in vitrified/warmed mouse zygotes created by IVF via ultra-superovulation. Exp Anim 2018;67:535-43. [PMID: 30012936 DOI: 10.1538/expanim.18-0062] [Cited by in Crossref: 13] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 13] [Article Influence: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis]
Number Citing Articles
1 Nguyen T, Do LTK, Namula Z, Lin Q, Torigoe N, Nagahara M, Hirata M, Tanihara F, Otoi T. Development and Genome Mutation of Bovine Zygotes Vitrified Before and After Genome Editing via Electroporation. cryo letters 2023;44:118-122. [DOI: 10.54680/fr23210110612] [Reference Citation Analysis]
2 Nakao S, Ito K, Sugahara C, Watanabe H, Kondoh G, Nakagata N, Takeo T. Synchronization of the ovulation and copulation timings increased the number of in vivo fertilized oocytes in superovulated female mice. PLoS One 2023;18:e0281330. [PMID: 36745586 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0281330] [Reference Citation Analysis]
3 Somfai T, Ogata K, Takeda K, Hirao Y. Bulk vitrification of in vitro produced bovine zygotes without reducing developmental competence to the blastocyst stage. Cryobiology 2022:S0011-2240(22)00046-3. [PMID: 35523314 DOI: 10.1016/j.cryobiol.2022.04.006] [Reference Citation Analysis]
4 Sato M, Nakamura S, Inada E, Takabayashi S. Recent Advances in the Production of Genome-Edited Rats. Int J Mol Sci 2022;23:2548. [PMID: 35269691 DOI: 10.3390/ijms23052548] [Cited by in Crossref: 3] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 4] [Article Influence: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis]
5 Chenouard V, Remy S, Tesson L, Ménoret S, Ouisse LH, Cherifi Y, Anegon I. Advances in Genome Editing and Application to the Generation of Genetically Modified Rat Models. Front Genet 2021;12:615491. [PMID: 33959146 DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2021.615491] [Cited by in Crossref: 12] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 13] [Article Influence: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis]
6 Hart-Johnson S, Mankelow K. Archiving genetically altered animals: a review of cryopreservation and recovery methods for genome edited animals. Lab Anim 2021;:236772211007306. [PMID: 33847177 DOI: 10.1177/00236772211007306] [Cited by in Crossref: 2] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 4] [Article Influence: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis]
7 Lin JC, Van Eenennaam AL. Electroporation-Mediated Genome Editing of Livestock Zygotes. Front Genet 2021;12:648482. [PMID: 33927751 DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2021.648482] [Cited by in Crossref: 6] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 7] [Article Influence: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis]
8 Hirata M, Wittayarat M, Tanihara F, Sato Y, Namula Z, Le QA, Lin Q, Takebayashi K, Otoi T. One-step genome editing of porcine zygotes through the electroporation of a CRISPR/Cas9 system with two guide RNAs. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim 2020;56:614-21. [PMID: 32978715 DOI: 10.1007/s11626-020-00507-9] [Cited by in Crossref: 7] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 7] [Article Influence: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis]
9 Takeo T, Nakao S, Nakagawa Y, Sztein JM, Nakagata N. Cryopreservation of mouse resources. Lab Anim Res 2020;36:33. [PMID: 32963977 DOI: 10.1186/s42826-020-00066-w] [Cited by in Crossref: 4] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 5] [Article Influence: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis]
10 Zhang L, Qi X, Ning W, Shentu L, Guo T, Zhang X, Li Y, Ma Y, Yu T, Knott JG, Cao Z, Zhang Y. Single-Cell Transcriptome Profiling Revealed That Vitrification of Somatic Cloned Porcine Blastocysts Causes Substantial Perturbations in Gene Expression. Front Genet 2020;11:640. [PMID: 32793277 DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2020.00640] [Cited by in Crossref: 4] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 4] [Article Influence: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis]
11 Goto M, Takeo T, Takahashi R, Nakagata N. Efficient production of immunodeficient non-obese diabetic/Shi-scid IL2rγnull mice via the superovulation technique using inhibin antiserum and gonadotropin. Lab Anim 2021;55:13-20. [PMID: 32507045 DOI: 10.1177/0023677220928091] [Cited by in Crossref: 2] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 2] [Article Influence: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis]
12 Fernández A, Morín M, Muñoz‐santos D, Josa S, Montero A, Rubio‐fernández M, Cantero M, Fernández J, del Hierro MJ, Castrillo M, Moreno‐pelayo MÁ, Montoliu L. Simple Protocol for Generating and Genotyping Genome‐Edited Mice With CRISPR‐Cas9 Reagents. Current Protocols in Mouse Biology 2020;10. [DOI: 10.1002/cpmo.69] [Cited by in Crossref: 6] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 6] [Article Influence: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis]
13 Amirkhanov RN, Stepanov GA. Systems of Delivery of CRISPR/Cas9 Ribonucleoprotein Complexes for Genome Editing. Russ J Bioorg Chem 2019;45:431-7. [DOI: 10.1134/s1068162019060025] [Cited by in Crossref: 10] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 9] [Article Influence: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis]
14 Darwish M, Nishizono H, Uosaki H, Sawada H, Sadahiro T, Ieda M, Takao K. Rapid and high-efficient generation of mutant mice using freeze-thawed embryos of the C57BL/6J strain. J Neurosci Methods 2019;317:149-56. [PMID: 30684509 DOI: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2019.01.010] [Cited by in Crossref: 3] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 4] [Article Influence: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis]