BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Cited by in F6Publishing
For: Deng J, Zhang R, Zhang L, Liu Y, Hao X, Liang H. Negative node count improvement prognostic prediction of the seventh edition of the TNM classification for gastric cancer. PLoS One. 2013;8:e80082. [PMID: 24348906 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0080082] [Cited by in Crossref: 15] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 15] [Article Influence: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis]
Number Citing Articles
1 Lu J, Wang W, Zheng CH, Fang C, Li P, Xie JW, Wang JB, Lin JX, Chen QY, Cao LL, Lin M, Huang CM, Zhou ZW. Influence of Total Lymph Node Count on Staging and Survival After Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer: An Analysis From a Two-Institution Database in China. Ann Surg Oncol. 2017;24:486-493. [PMID: 27619942 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-016-5494-7] [Cited by in Crossref: 39] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 43] [Article Influence: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis]
2 Meng X, Yu X, Dong Q, Xu X, Li J, Xu Q, Ma J, Zhou C. Distribution of circulating follicular helper T cells and expression of interleukin-21 and chemokine C-X-C ligand 13 in gastric cancer. Oncol Lett. 2018;16:3917-3922. [PMID: 30128008 DOI: 10.3892/ol.2018.9112] [Cited by in Crossref: 9] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 10] [Article Influence: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis]
3 Fu ZQ, Zou F, Wang XM, Li Y, Liu LJ. Involvement of tunicamycin-induced endoplasmic reticulum stress in invasion of gastric cancer cells. Shijie Huaren Xiaohua Zazhi 2014; 22(8): 1101-1105 [DOI: 10.11569/wcjd.v22.i8.1101] [Reference Citation Analysis]
4 Zhang N, Deng J, Wang W, Sun Z, Wang Z, Xu H, Zhou Z, Liang H. Negative lymph node count as an independent prognostic factor in stage III patients after curative gastrectomy: A retrospective cohort study based on a multicenter database. Int J Surg 2020;74:44-52. [PMID: 31874262 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2019.12.018] [Cited by in Crossref: 2] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 2] [Article Influence: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis]
5 Zhao LY, Chen XL, Wang YG, Xin Y, Zhang WH, Wang YS, Chen XZ, Yang K, Liu K, Xue L, Zhang B, Chen ZX, Chen JP, Zhou ZG, Hu JK. A new predictive model combined of tumor size, lymph nodes count and lymphovascular invasion for survival prognosis in patients with lymph node-negative gastric cancer. Oncotarget. 2016;7:72300-72310. [PMID: 27509175 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.11035] [Cited by in Crossref: 14] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 14] [Article Influence: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis]
6 Deng J, Yamashita H, Seto Y, Liang H. Increasing the Number of Examined Lymph Nodes is a Prerequisite for Improvement in the Accurate Evaluation of Overall Survival of Node-Negative Gastric Cancer Patients. Ann Surg Oncol. 2017;24:745-753. [PMID: 27770340 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-016-5513-8] [Cited by in Crossref: 24] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 30] [Article Influence: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis]
7 Deutsch GB, O'Connor V, Sim MS, Lee JH, Bilchik AJ. Incorporating surgical quality into the AJCC 7th edition improves staging accuracy in gastric cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2015;22:11-16. [PMID: 25192676 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-014-4004-z] [Cited by in Crossref: 12] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 14] [Article Influence: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis]
8 Deng J, Zhang R, Wu L, Zhang L, Wang X, Liu Y, Hao X, Liang H. Superiority of the Ratio Between Negative and Positive Lymph Nodes for Predicting the Prognosis for Patients With Gastric Cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 2015;22:1258-66. [DOI: 10.1245/s10434-014-4121-8] [Cited by in Crossref: 18] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 21] [Article Influence: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis]
9 Jiang N, Deng JY, Ding XW, Liu Y, Liang H. Tumor volume as a prognostic factor was superior to the seventh edition of the pT classification in resectable gastric cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2015;41:315-322. [PMID: 25601610 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2014.11.045] [Cited by in Crossref: 11] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 10] [Article Influence: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis]
10 Yamashita H, Deng J, Liang H, Seto Y. Re-evaluating the prognostic validity of the negative to positive lymph node ratio in node-positive gastric cancer patients. Surgery 2017;161:1588-96. [DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2016.12.018] [Cited by in Crossref: 11] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 10] [Article Influence: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis]
11 Zhang N, Bai H, Deng J, Wang W, Sun Z, Wang Z, Xu H, Zhou Z, Liang H. Impact of examined lymph node count on staging and long-term survival of patients with node-negative stage III gastric cancer: a retrospective study using a Chinese multi-institutional registry with Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) data validation. Ann Transl Med 2020;8:1075. [PMID: 33145294 DOI: 10.21037/atm-20-1358a] [Cited by in Crossref: 5] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 5] [Article Influence: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis]
12 Zheng WF, Ji TT, Lin Y, Li RZ. The prognostic value of lymph nodes count on survival of patients with node-negative gastric cancer. Oncotarget. 2016;7:43680-43688. [PMID: 27270656 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.9845] [Cited by in Crossref: 10] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 14] [Article Influence: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis]
13 Wang HH, Li K, Xu H, Sun Z, Wang ZN, Xu HM. Improvement of T stage precision by integration of surgical and pathological staging in radically resected stage pT3-pT4b gastric cancer. Oncotarget 2017;8:46506-13. [PMID: 28148895 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.14828] [Cited by in Crossref: 7] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 6] [Article Influence: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis]
14 Wang S, Zhang B, Li C, Cui C, Yue D, Shi B, Zhang Q, Zhang Z, Zhang X, Wang C. Prognostic value of number of negative lymph node in patients with stage II and IIIa non-small cell lung cancer. Oncotarget 2017;8:79387-96. [PMID: 29108317 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.18154] [Cited by in Crossref: 7] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 9] [Article Influence: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis]
15 Wu XJ, Miao RL, Li ZY, Bu ZD, Zhang LH, Wu AW, Zong XL, Li SX, Shan F, Ji X. Prognostic value of metastatic lymph node ratio as an additional tool to the TNM stage system in gastric cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2015;41:927-933. [PMID: 25913059 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2015.03.225] [Cited by in Crossref: 29] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 35] [Article Influence: 4.1] [Reference Citation Analysis]