BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Cited by in F6Publishing
For: Cuttler JM, Calabrese EJ. What Would Become of Nuclear Risk if Governments Changed Their Regulations to Recognize the Evidence of Radiation's Beneficial Health Effects for Exposures That Are Below the Thresholds for Detrimental Effects? Dose Response 2021;19:15593258211059317. [PMID: 34880717 DOI: 10.1177/15593258211059317] [Cited by in Crossref: 5] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 5] [Article Influence: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis]
Number Citing Articles
1 Okonkwo UC, Ohagwu CC, Aronu ME, Okafor CE, Idumah CI, Okokpujie IP, Chukwu NN, Chukwunyelu CE. Ionizing radiation protection and the linear No-threshold controversy: Extent of support or counter to the prevailing paradigm. Journal of Environmental Radioactivity 2022;253-254:106984. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvrad.2022.106984] [Reference Citation Analysis]
2 Jargin S. Exaggerated Risk Perception of Low-Dose Radiation: Motives and Mechanisms. Dose-Response 2022;20:155932582211033. [DOI: 10.1177/15593258221103378] [Reference Citation Analysis]
3 Hurlbert M, Shasko L, Neetz M. Addressing Risk Perceptions of Low-Dose Radiation Exposure. Dose-Response 2022;20:155932582210884. [DOI: 10.1177/15593258221088428] [Cited by in Crossref: 1] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 1] [Article Influence: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis]
4 Cuttler JM, Lamet MS, Calabrese EJ. Treatment of Early-Stage Alzheimer’s Disease With CT Scans of the Brain: A Case Report. Dose-Response 2022;20:155932582210783. [DOI: 10.1177/15593258221078392] [Reference Citation Analysis]
5 Scott BR. Vanishing by Design of Cancer Risk Uncertainty for Low Radiation Doses Is Misleading and Unscientific. Dose-Response 2022;20:155932582210783. [DOI: 10.1177/15593258221078387] [Cited by in Crossref: 1] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 1] [Article Influence: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis]