BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Cited by in F6Publishing
For: Plachinski SJ, Boehm LM, Adamson KA, LoGiudice JA, Doren EL. Comparative Analysis of Prepectoral versus Subpectoral Implant-based Breast Reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2021;9:e3709. [PMID: 34422525 DOI: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000003709] [Cited by in Crossref: 1] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 5] [Article Influence: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis]
Number Citing Articles
1 Ostapenko E, Nixdorf L, Devyatko Y, Exner R, Wimmer K, Fitzal F. Prepectoral Versus Subpectoral Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction: A Systemic Review and Meta-analysis. Ann Surg Oncol 2023;30:126-36. [PMID: 36245049 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-022-12567-0] [Reference Citation Analysis]
2 Escandón JM, Sweitzer K, Christiano JG, Gooch JC, Olzinski AT, Prieto PA, Skinner KA, Langstein HN, Manrique OJ. Subpectoral versus prepectoral two-stage breast reconstruction: A propensity score-matched analysis of 30-day morbidity and long-term outcomes. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2023;76:76-87. [PMID: 36513014 DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2022.10.028] [Reference Citation Analysis]
3 Pires GR, Moss WD, Hosein RC, Overschmidt BT, Magno-padron DA, Agarwal JP, Mcfarland MM, Casucci T, Kwok AC. Comparison of Human, Porcine, and Bovine Acellular Dermal Matrix in Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg 2022;89:694-702. [DOI: 10.1097/sap.0000000000003319] [Reference Citation Analysis]
4 Mégevand V, Scampa M, Mcevoy H, Kalbermatten DF, Oranges CM. Comparison of Outcomes Following Prepectoral and Subpectoral Implants for Breast Reconstruction: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Cancers 2022;14:4223. [DOI: 10.3390/cancers14174223] [Reference Citation Analysis]
5 Baichorov E, Zikiryakhodzhaev A, Ismagilov A, Vanesyan A. Comparative analysis of health-related quality of life in patients with breast cancer after immediate prepectoral breast reconstruction. Plast khir 2022. [DOI: 10.17116/plast.hirurgia202202125] [Reference Citation Analysis]