BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Cited by in F6Publishing
For: Dror IE. Cognitive and Human Factors in Expert Decision Making: Six Fallacies and the Eight Sources of Bias. Anal Chem 2020;92:7998-8004. [PMID: 32508089 DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.0c00704] [Cited by in Crossref: 45] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 26] [Article Influence: 22.5] [Reference Citation Analysis]
Number Citing Articles
1 He N, Wang L, Hao H. Contextual Bias on Decision-Making in Forensic Toxicology: First Survey from China. Forensic Science International 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2022.111232] [Reference Citation Analysis]
2 Dror IE, Melinek J, Arden JL, Kukucka J, Hawkins S, Carter J, Atherton DS. Authors' Response to Speth et al Commentary on. J Forensic Sci 2021;66:2580-1. [PMID: 34498747 DOI: 10.1111/1556-4029.14845] [Reference Citation Analysis]
3 Stoykova R. Digital evidence: Unaddressed threats to fairness and the presumption of innocence. Computer Law & Security Review 2021;42:105575. [DOI: 10.1016/j.clsr.2021.105575] [Reference Citation Analysis]
4 Dror IE, Scherr KC, Mohammed LA, MacLean CL, Cunningham L. Biasability and reliability of expert forensic document examiners. Forensic Sci Int 2021;318:110610. [PMID: 33358191 DOI: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2020.110610] [Cited by in Crossref: 1] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 1] [Article Influence: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis]
5 Meterko V, Cooper G. Cognitive Biases in Criminal Case Evaluation: A Review of the Research. J Police Crim Psych. [DOI: 10.1007/s11896-020-09425-8] [Cited by in Crossref: 2] [Article Influence: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis]
6 Scarpazza C, Zampieri I, Miolla A, Melis G, Pietrini P, Sartori G. A multidisciplinary approach to insanity assessment as a way to reduce cognitive biases. Forensic Sci Int 2021;319:110652. [PMID: 33360246 DOI: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2020.110652] [Cited by in Crossref: 1] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 2] [Article Influence: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis]
7 Dror IE, Kukucka J. Linear Sequential Unmasking-Expanded (LSU-E): A general approach for improving decision making as well as minimizing noise and bias. Forensic Sci Int Synerg 2021;3:100161. [PMID: 34466797 DOI: 10.1016/j.fsisyn.2021.100161] [Cited by in Crossref: 3] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 2] [Article Influence: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis]
8 Göranson L, Svensson O, Andiné P, Bromander S, Bagge AL, Karlén MH. Decision-Making Within Forensic Psychiatric Investigations: The Use of Various Information Sources by Different Expert Groups to Reach Conclusions on Legal Insanity. Front Psychiatry 2022;13:822519. [DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.822519] [Reference Citation Analysis]
9 Kukucka J, Dror IE, Yu M, Hall L, Morgan RM. The impact of evidence lineups on fingerprint expert decisions. Appl Cognit Psychol 2020;34:1143-53. [DOI: 10.1002/acp.3703] [Cited by in Crossref: 2] [Article Influence: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis]
10 Dror IE, Melinek J, Arden JL, Kukucka J, Hawkins S, Carter J, Atherton DS. Authors' Response to Gill et al Commentary on. J Forensic Sci 2021;66:2555-6. [PMID: 34498724 DOI: 10.1111/1556-4029.14850] [Reference Citation Analysis]
11 Allen JE, Clunie G, Ma JK, Coffey M, Winiker K, Richmond S, Lowell SY, Volkmer A. Translating Ultrasound into Clinical Practice for the Assessment of Swallowing and Laryngeal Function: A Speech and Language Pathology-Led Consensus Study. Dysphagia 2022. [PMID: 35201387 DOI: 10.1007/s00455-022-10413-9] [Reference Citation Analysis]
12 Smith AM, Neal TMS. The distinction between discriminability and reliability in forensic science. Sci Justice 2021;61:319-31. [PMID: 34172120 DOI: 10.1016/j.scijus.2021.04.002] [Reference Citation Analysis]
13 Dror IE, Melinek J, Arden JL, Kukucka J, Hawkins S, Carter J, Atherton DS. Authors' Response to Obenson Commentary on. J Forensic Sci 2021;66:2585-6. [PMID: 34499358 DOI: 10.1111/1556-4029.14847] [Reference Citation Analysis]
14 Young G, Goodman-delahunty J. Revisiting Daubert: Judicial Gatekeeping and Expert Ethics in Court. Psychol Inj and Law 2021;14:304-15. [DOI: 10.1007/s12207-021-09428-8] [Reference Citation Analysis]
15 Almazrouei MA. Comment on “Cognitive and Human Factors in Expert Decision Making: Six Fallacies and the Eight Sources of Bias”. Anal Chem 2020;92:12725-6. [DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.0c03002] [Cited by in Crossref: 2] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 1] [Article Influence: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis]
16 Mattijssen EJAT, Witteman CLM, Berger CEH, Zheng XA, Soons JA, Stoel RD. Firearm examination: Examiner judgments and computer-based comparisons. J Forensic Sci 2021;66:96-111. [PMID: 32970858 DOI: 10.1111/1556-4029.14557] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 1] [Reference Citation Analysis]
17 Arif SA, Schlotfeldt J. Gaps in Measuring and Mitigating Implicit Bias in Healthcare. Front Pharmacol 2021;12:633565. [PMID: 33815114 DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2021.633565] [Cited by in Crossref: 1] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 1] [Article Influence: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis]
18 Dror IE, Scurich N. (Mis)use of scientific measurements in forensic science. Forensic Sci Int Synerg 2020;2:333-8. [PMID: 33385131 DOI: 10.1016/j.fsisyn.2020.08.006] [Cited by in Crossref: 4] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 3] [Article Influence: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis]
19 Dror I, Melinek J, Arden JL, Kukucka J, Hawkins S, Carter J, Atherton DS. Cognitive bias in forensic pathology decisions. J Forensic Sci 2021;66:1751-7. [PMID: 33608908 DOI: 10.1111/1556-4029.14697] [Cited by in Crossref: 20] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 20] [Article Influence: 20.0] [Reference Citation Analysis]
20 Scarpazza C, Miolla A, Zampieri I, Melis G, Sartori G, Ferracuti S, Pietrini P. Translational Application of a Neuro-Scientific Multi-Modal Approach Into Forensic Psychiatric Evaluation: Why and How? Front Psychiatry 2021;12:597918. [PMID: 33613339 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.597918] [Cited by in Crossref: 1] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 1] [Article Influence: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis]
21 Eisape A, Nogueira A. See Change: Overcoming Anti-Black Racism in Health Systems. Front Public Health 2022;10:895684. [DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.895684] [Reference Citation Analysis]
22 Winburn AP, Clemmons CMJ. Objectivity is a myth that harms the practice and diversity of forensic science. Forensic Sci Int Synerg 2021;3:100196. [PMID: 34622187 DOI: 10.1016/j.fsisyn.2021.100196] [Cited by in Crossref: 1] [Article Influence: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis]
23 Hartley S, Winburn AP, Dror IE. Metric forensic anthropology decisions: Reliability and biasability of sectioning-point-based sex estimates. J Forensic Sci 2021. [PMID: 34725824 DOI: 10.1111/1556-4029.14931] [Cited by in Crossref: 1] [Article Influence: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis]
24 Coyne JOC, Coutts AJ, Newton RU, Haff GG. The Current State of Subjective Training Load Monitoring: Follow-Up and Future Directions. Sports Med Open 2022;8:53. [PMID: 35426569 DOI: 10.1186/s40798-022-00433-y] [Cited by in Crossref: 1] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 1] [Article Influence: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis]
25 Peng Z, Ye K, Li J. Break the Cycle of Collusion: Simulation to Influence Mechanism of Cognitive Bias on To-Collude Decision Making. Buildings 2022;12:997. [DOI: 10.3390/buildings12070997] [Reference Citation Analysis]
26 Koppl R. Letter to the Editor—Do Court‐assessed Fees Induce Laboratory Contingency Bias in Crime Laboratories? J Forensic Sci 2020;65:1793-4. [DOI: 10.1111/1556-4029.14545] [Cited by in Crossref: 1] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 1] [Article Influence: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis]
27 Puch-Solis R, Pope S. Interpretation of DNA data within the context of UK forensic science - evaluation. Emerg Top Life Sci 2021;5:405-13. [PMID: 34027985 DOI: 10.1042/ETLS20200340] [Cited by in Crossref: 2] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 1] [Article Influence: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis]
28 Sunde N, Dror IE. A hierarchy of expert performance (HEP) applied to digital forensics: Reliability and biasability in digital forensics decision making. Forensic Science International: Digital Investigation 2021;37:301175. [DOI: 10.1016/j.fsidi.2021.301175] [Cited by in Crossref: 1] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 2] [Article Influence: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis]
29 Chiam SL, Dror IE, Huber CD, Higgins D. The biasing impact of irrelevant contextual information on forensic odontology radiograph matching decisions. Forensic Sci Int 2021;327:110997. [PMID: 34536753 DOI: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2021.110997] [Reference Citation Analysis]
30 Dror IE, Melinek J, Arden JL, Kukucka J, Hawkins S, Carter J, Atherton DS. Authors' Response to Gill et al Response. J Forensic Sci 2021;66:2559-60. [PMID: 34498725 DOI: 10.1111/1556-4029.14846] [Reference Citation Analysis]
31 Maegherman E, Ask K, Horselenberg R, van Koppen PJ. Law and order effects: on cognitive dissonance and belief perseverance. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law 2022;29:33-52. [DOI: 10.1080/13218719.2020.1855268] [Cited by in Crossref: 1] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 1] [Article Influence: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis]
32 Ubelaker DH. Research integrity in forensic anthropology. Forensic Sciences Research 2021;6:285-91. [DOI: 10.1080/20961790.2021.1963515] [Reference Citation Analysis]
33 Hamnett HJ, Dror IE. The effect of contextual information on decision-making in forensic toxicology. Forensic Sci Int Synerg 2020;2:339-48. [PMID: 33385132 DOI: 10.1016/j.fsisyn.2020.06.003] [Cited by in Crossref: 4] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 3] [Article Influence: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis]
34 Airlie M, Robertson J, Krosch MN, Brooks E. Contemporary issues in forensic science-Worldwide survey results. Forensic Sci Int 2021;320:110704. [PMID: 33581657 DOI: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2021.110704] [Cited by in Crossref: 2] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 1] [Article Influence: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis]
35 Svensson O, Andiné P, Bromander S, Ask K, Lindqvist Bagge AS, Hildebrand Karlén M. The decision-making process in Swedish forensic psychiatric investigations. Int J Law Psychiatry 2022;80:101709. [PMID: 34924110 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2021.101709] [Cited by in Crossref: 1] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 1] [Article Influence: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis]
36 Raharjanti NW, Wiguna T, Purwadianto A, Soemantri D, Bardosono S, Poerwandari EK, Mahajudin MS, Ramadianto AS, Alfonso CA, Findyartini A, Nugrahadi NR, Lazuardi MQ, Subroto PAM, Saroso OJDA, Levania MK. Clinical Reasoning in Forensic Psychiatry: Concepts, Processes, and Pitfalls. Front Psychiatry 2021;12:691377. [PMID: 34421677 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.691377] [Reference Citation Analysis]
37 Almazrouei MA, Dror IE, Morgan RM. Organizational and Human Factors Affecting Forensic Decision-Making: Workplace Stress and Feedback. J Forensic Sci 2020;65:1968-77. [PMID: 32841390 DOI: 10.1111/1556-4029.14542] [Cited by in Crossref: 3] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 1] [Article Influence: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis]
38 Staller MS, Koerner S. A case example of teaching reflective policing to police students. Teaching Public Administration. [DOI: 10.1177/01447394211067109] [Reference Citation Analysis]
39 Segal A, Pompedda F, Haginoya S, Kaniušonytė G, Santtila P. Avatars with child sexual abuse (vs. no abuse) scenarios elicit different emotional reactions. Psychology, Crime & Law. [DOI: 10.1080/1068316x.2022.2082422] [Reference Citation Analysis]
40 Dror IE, Melinek J, Arden JL, Kukucka J, Hawkins S, Carter J, Atherton DS. Authors' Response to Graber Commentary on. J Forensic Sci 2021;66:2575-6. [PMID: 34505703 DOI: 10.1111/1556-4029.14848] [Reference Citation Analysis]
41 Hartley S, Winburn AP. A hierarchy of expert performance as applied to forensic anthropology. J Forensic Sci 2021;66:1617-26. [PMID: 34180547 DOI: 10.1111/1556-4029.14761] [Cited by in Crossref: 1] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 2] [Article Influence: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis]
42 Growns B, Kukucka J. The prevalence effect in fingerprint identification: Match and non‐match base‐rates impact misses and false alarms. Appl Cognit Psychol 2021;35:751-60. [DOI: 10.1002/acp.3800] [Cited by in Crossref: 2] [Article Influence: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis]
43 Moreno-Fernández MM, Blanco F, Matute H. The tendency to stop collecting information is linked to illusions of causality. Sci Rep 2021;11:3942. [PMID: 33594129 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-82075-w] [Reference Citation Analysis]
44 MacLean CL, Dror IE. The effect of contextual information on professional judgment: Reliability and biasability of expert workplace safety inspectors. J Safety Res 2021;77:13-22. [PMID: 34092303 DOI: 10.1016/j.jsr.2021.01.002] [Cited by in Crossref: 1] [Article Influence: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis]
45 Yamada Y, Teixeira da Silva JA. A psychological perspective towards understanding the objective and subjective gray zones in predatory publishing. Qual Quant. [DOI: 10.1007/s11135-021-01307-3] [Cited by in Crossref: 2] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 1] [Article Influence: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis]
46 Davidson M, Nakhaeizadeh S, Rando C. Cognitive bias and the order of examination in forensic anthropological non-metric methods: a pilot study. Australian Journal of Forensic Sciences. [DOI: 10.1080/00450618.2021.1998625] [Reference Citation Analysis]
47 de Boer HH, Fronczek J, Berger CEH, Sjerps M. The logic of forensic pathology opinion. Int J Legal Med 2022. [PMID: 34988615 DOI: 10.1007/s00414-021-02754-1] [Reference Citation Analysis]
48 Chiam S, Louise J, Higgins D. “Identified”, “probable”, “possible” or “exclude”: The influence of task-irrelevant information on forensic odontology identification opinion. Science & Justice 2022;62:461-70. [DOI: 10.1016/j.scijus.2022.06.002] [Reference Citation Analysis]
49 Neuilly MA. Sources of bias in death determination: A research note articulating the need to include systemic sources of biases along with cognitive ones as impacting mortality data. J Forensic Sci 2022. [PMID: 35726157 DOI: 10.1111/1556-4029.15080] [Reference Citation Analysis]
50 Rodriguez Almada H, Passalacqua NV, Congram D, Pilloud M. As forensic scientists and as people, we must not confuse objectivity with neutrality. J Forensic Sci 2021;66:2067-8. [PMID: 34176154 DOI: 10.1111/1556-4029.14785] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 2] [Reference Citation Analysis]
51 Lee D, Kim K. Public R&D Projects-Based Investment and Collaboration Framework for an Overarching South Korean National Strategy of Personalized Medicine. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2022;19:1291. [PMID: 35162311 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19031291] [Cited by in Crossref: 2] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 1] [Article Influence: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis]
52 Rassin E. ‘Anyone who commits such a cruel crime, must be criminally irresponsible’: context effects in forensic psychological assessment. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law. [DOI: 10.1080/13218719.2021.1938272] [Cited by in Crossref: 1] [Article Influence: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis]
53 Selim H, Korkman J, Pirjatanniemi E, Antfolk J. Asylum claims based on sexual orientation: a review of psycho-legal issues in credibility assessments. Psychology, Crime & Law. [DOI: 10.1080/1068316x.2022.2044038] [Cited by in Crossref: 1] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 1] [Article Influence: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis]
54 Andrewes P, Bullock S, Turnbull R, Coolbear T. Chemical instrumental analysis versus human evaluation to measure sensory properties of dairy products: What is fit for purpose? International Dairy Journal 2021;121:105098. [DOI: 10.1016/j.idairyj.2021.105098] [Cited by in Crossref: 3] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 2] [Article Influence: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis]