BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Cited by in F6Publishing
For: Kopriva S, Calderwood A, Weckopp SC, Koprivova A. Plant sulfur and Big Data. Plant Science 2015;241:1-10. [DOI: 10.1016/j.plantsci.2015.09.014] [Cited by in Crossref: 35] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 24] [Article Influence: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis]
Number Citing Articles
1 Henríquez-Valencia C, Arenas-M A, Medina J, Canales J. Integrative Transcriptomic Analysis Uncovers Novel Gene Modules That Underlie the Sulfate Response in Arabidopsis thaliana. Front Plant Sci 2018;9:470. [PMID: 29692794 DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2018.00470] [Cited by in Crossref: 15] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 13] [Article Influence: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis]
2 Schwarz EM, Roeder AH. Transcriptomic Effects of the Cell Cycle Regulator LGO in Arabidopsis Sepals. Front Plant Sci 2016;7:1744. [PMID: 27920789 DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2016.01744] [Cited by in Crossref: 9] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 9] [Article Influence: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis]
3 Chorianopoulou SN, Sigalas PP, Tsoutsoura N, Apodiakou A, Saridis G, Ventouris YE, Bouranis DL. Regulation of Sulfur Homeostasis in Mycorrhizal Maize Plants Grown in a Fe-Limited Environment. Int J Mol Sci 2020;21:E3249. [PMID: 32375343 DOI: 10.3390/ijms21093249] [Reference Citation Analysis]
4 Bell L, Chadwick M, Puranik M, Tudor R, Methven L, Kennedy S, Wagstaff C. The Eruca sativa Genome and Transcriptome: A Targeted Analysis of Sulfur Metabolism and Glucosinolate Biosynthesis Pre and Postharvest. Front Plant Sci 2020;11:525102. [PMID: 33193472 DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2020.525102] [Cited by in Crossref: 2] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 1] [Article Influence: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis]
5 Bell L. The Biosynthesis of Glucosinolates: Insights, Inconsistencies, and Unknowns. In: Roberts JA, editor. Annual Plant Reviews online. Wiley; 2018. pp. 969-1000. [DOI: 10.1002/9781119312994.apr0708] [Cited by in Crossref: 5] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 2] [Article Influence: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis]
6 Pavlů J, Novák J, Koukalová V, Luklová M, Brzobohatý B, Černý M. Cytokinin at the Crossroads of Abiotic Stress Signalling Pathways. Int J Mol Sci 2018;19:E2450. [PMID: 30126242 DOI: 10.3390/ijms19082450] [Cited by in Crossref: 57] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 34] [Article Influence: 14.3] [Reference Citation Analysis]
7 Brumbarova T, Ivanov R. The Nutrient Response Transcriptional Regulome of Arabidopsis. iScience 2019;19:358-68. [PMID: 31415997 DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2019.07.045] [Cited by in Crossref: 7] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 8] [Article Influence: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis]
8 Chan KX, Phua SY, Van Breusegem F, Kopriva S. Secondary sulfur metabolism in cellular signalling and oxidative stress responses. Journal of Experimental Botany 2019;70:4237-50. [DOI: 10.1093/jxb/erz119] [Cited by in Crossref: 18] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 11] [Article Influence: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis]
9 Pariasca-Tanaka J, Baertschi C, Wissuwa M. Identification of Loci Through Genome-Wide Association Studies to Improve Tolerance to Sulfur Deficiency in Rice. Front Plant Sci 2019;10:1668. [PMID: 32010158 DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2019.01668] [Cited by in Crossref: 4] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 2] [Article Influence: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis]
10 Réthoré E, Ali N, Yvin JC, Hosseini SA. Silicon Regulates Source to Sink Metabolic Homeostasis and Promotes Growth of Rice Plants Under Sulfur Deficiency. Int J Mol Sci 2020;21:E3677. [PMID: 32456188 DOI: 10.3390/ijms21103677] [Cited by in Crossref: 7] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 3] [Article Influence: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis]
11 Kohli SK, Bali S, Khanna K, Bakshi P, Sharma P, Sharma A, Verma V, Ohri P, Mir BA, Kaur R, Bhardwaj R. A Current Scenario on Role of Brassinosteroids in Plant Defense Triggered in Response to Biotic Challenges. In: Hayat S, Yusuf M, Bhardwaj R, Bajguz A, editors. Brassinosteroids: Plant Growth and Development. Singapore: Springer; 2019. pp. 367-88. [DOI: 10.1007/978-981-13-6058-9_13] [Cited by in Crossref: 2] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 1] [Article Influence: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis]
12 Zheng Z, Leustek T. Advances in understanding sulfur utilization efficiency in plants. Plant Macronutrient Use Efficiency. Elsevier; 2017. pp. 215-32. [DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-12-811308-0.00012-0] [Cited by in Crossref: 2] [Article Influence: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis]
13 de Bang TC, Husted S, Laursen KH, Persson DP, Schjoerring JK. The molecular-physiological functions of mineral macronutrients and their consequences for deficiency symptoms in plants. New Phytol 2021;229:2446-69. [PMID: 33175410 DOI: 10.1111/nph.17074] [Cited by in Crossref: 14] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 7] [Article Influence: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis]
14 Alarcón-poblete E, Inostroza-blancheteau C, Alberdi M, Rengel Z, Reyes-díaz M. Molecular regulation of aluminum resistance and sulfur nutrition during root growth. Planta 2018;247:27-39. [DOI: 10.1007/s00425-017-2805-6] [Cited by in Crossref: 7] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 4] [Article Influence: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis]
15 Sun Y, Jain A, Xue Y, Wang X, Zhao G, Liu L, Hu Z, Hu S, Shen X, Liu X, Ai H, Xu G, Sun S. OsSQD1 at the crossroads of phosphate and sulfur metabolism affects plant morphology and lipid composition in response to phosphate deprivation. Plant Cell Environ 2020;43:1669-90. [PMID: 32266981 DOI: 10.1111/pce.13764] [Cited by in Crossref: 4] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 3] [Article Influence: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis]
16 Watanabe M, Hoefgen R. Sulphur systems biology-making sense of omics data. J Exp Bot 2019;70:4155-70. [PMID: 31404467 DOI: 10.1093/jxb/erz260] [Cited by in Crossref: 9] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 5] [Article Influence: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis]
17 Augusto ADS, Sperança MA, Andrade DF, Pereira-filho ER. Nutrient and Contaminant Quantification in Solid and Liquid Food Samples Using Laser-Ablation Inductively Coupled Plasma-Mass Spectrometry (LA-ICP-MS): Discussion of Calibration Strategies. Food Anal Methods 2017;10:1515-22. [DOI: 10.1007/s12161-016-0703-3] [Cited by in Crossref: 9] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 6] [Article Influence: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis]
18 Koprivova A, Kopriva S. Sulfur metabolism and its manipulation in crops. J Genet Genomics 2016;43:623-9. [PMID: 27582269 DOI: 10.1016/j.jgg.2016.07.001] [Cited by in Crossref: 8] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 7] [Article Influence: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis]
19 Feldmann J, Bluemlein K, Krupp EM, Mueller M, Wood BA. Metallomics Study in Plants Exposed to Arsenic, Mercury, Selenium and Sulphur. In: Arruda MAZ, editor. Metallomics. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2018. pp. 67-100. [DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-90143-5_4] [Cited by in Crossref: 5] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 5] [Article Influence: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis]
20 Patel P, Yadav K, Srivastava AK, Suprasanna P, Ganapathi TR. Overexpression of native Musa-miR397 enhances plant biomass without compromising abiotic stress tolerance in banana. Sci Rep 2019;9:16434. [PMID: 31712582 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-52858-3] [Cited by in Crossref: 8] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 4] [Article Influence: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis]
21 Mayyas M, Sahajwalla V. Carbon nano-sponge with enhanced electrochemical properties: A new understanding of carbon activation. Chemical Engineering Journal 2019;358:980-91. [DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2018.10.094] [Cited by in Crossref: 9] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 4] [Article Influence: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis]
22 Lee K, Lehmann M, Paul MV, Wang L, Luckner M, Wanner G, Geigenberger P, Leister D, Kleine T. Lack of FIBRILLIN6 in Arabidopsis thaliana affects light acclimation and sulfate metabolism. New Phytol 2020;225:1715-31. [PMID: 31596965 DOI: 10.1111/nph.16246] [Cited by in Crossref: 2] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 3] [Article Influence: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis]
23 Criollo-Arteaga S, Moya-Jimenez S, Jimenez-Meza M, Gonzalez-Vera V, Gordon-Nunez J, Llerena-Llerena S, Ramirez-Villacis DX, van 't Hof P, Leon-Reyes A. Sulfur Deprivation Modulates Salicylic Acid Responses via Nonexpressor of Pathogenesis-Related Gene 1 in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plants (Basel) 2021;10:1065. [PMID: 34073325 DOI: 10.3390/plants10061065] [Reference Citation Analysis]
24 González-Morales S, Pérez-Labrada F, García-Enciso EL, Leija-Martínez P, Medrano-Macías J, Dávila-Rangel IE, Juárez-Maldonado A, Rivas-Martínez EN, Benavides-Mendoza A. Selenium and Sulfur to Produce Allium Functional Crops. Molecules 2017;22:E558. [PMID: 28358332 DOI: 10.3390/molecules22040558] [Cited by in Crossref: 34] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 23] [Article Influence: 6.8] [Reference Citation Analysis]
25 Zenda T, Liu S, Yao D, Duan H. Analysis of sulphur and chlorine induced DNA cytosine methylation alterations in fresh corn (Zea mays L. saccharata and rugosa) leaf tissues by methylation sensitive amplification polymorphism (MSAP) approach. Genes Genomics 2018;40:913-25. [PMID: 30155706 DOI: 10.1007/s13258-018-0685-1] [Cited by in Crossref: 1] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 1] [Article Influence: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis]