BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Cited by in F6Publishing
For: Bradley WG. Pros and Cons of 3 Tesla MRI. Journal of the American College of Radiology 2008;5:871-8. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2008.02.005] [Cited by in Crossref: 9] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 8] [Article Influence: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis]
Number Citing Articles
1 Park BK, Kim TJ. Useful MRI Findings for Minimally Invasive Surgery for Early Cervical Cancer. Cancers (Basel) 2021;13:4078. [PMID: 34439231 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13164078] [Cited by in Crossref: 2] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 2] [Article Influence: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis]
2 Runge VM, Heverhagen JT. Advocating the Development of Next-Generation, Advanced-Design Low-Field Magnetic Resonance Systems. Invest Radiol 2020;55:747-53. [PMID: 33156083 DOI: 10.1097/RLI.0000000000000703] [Cited by in Crossref: 15] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 15] [Article Influence: 7.5] [Reference Citation Analysis]
3 Chartier AL, Bouvier MJ, Mcpherson DR, Stepenosky JE, Taysom DA, Marks RM. The Safety of Maternal and Fetal MRI at 3 T. American Journal of Roentgenology 2019;213:1170-3. [DOI: 10.2214/ajr.19.21400] [Cited by in Crossref: 37] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 39] [Article Influence: 12.3] [Reference Citation Analysis]
4 Finkenstaedt T, Siriwanarangsun P, Achar S, Carl M, Finkenstaedt S, Abeydeera N, Chung CB, Bae WC. Ultrashort Time-to-Echo Magnetic Resonance Imaging at 3 T for the Detection of Spondylolysis in Cadaveric Spines: Comparison With CT. Invest Radiol 2019;54:32-8. [PMID: 30157099 DOI: 10.1097/RLI.0000000000000506] [Cited by in Crossref: 15] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 18] [Article Influence: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis]
5 Yedavalli V, Das D, Massoud TF. Eponymous “valves” of the nasolacrimal drainage apparatus. II. Frequency of visualization on dacryocystography: “Valves” of the Nasolacrimal Drainage Apparatus. Clin Anat 2019;32:35-40. [DOI: 10.1002/ca.23283] [Cited by in Crossref: 4] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 5] [Article Influence: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis]
6 Horsburgh A, Massoud TF. The salivary ducts of Wharton and Stenson: Analysis of normal variant sialographic morphometry and a historical review. Annals of Anatomy - Anatomischer Anzeiger 2013;195:238-42. [DOI: 10.1016/j.aanat.2012.11.003] [Cited by in Crossref: 16] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 18] [Article Influence: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis]
7 Matys T, Horsburgh A, Kirollos RW, Massoud TF. The aqueduct of Sylvius: applied 3-T magnetic resonance imaging anatomy and morphometry with neuroendoscopic relevance. Neurosurgery 2013;73:ons132-40; discussion ons140. [PMID: 23615083 DOI: 10.1227/01.neu.0000430286.08552.ca] [Cited by in Crossref: 5] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 5] [Article Influence: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis]
8 Horsburgh A, Massoud TF. The circumventricular organs of the brain: conspicuity on clinical 3T MRI and a review of functional anatomy. Surg Radiol Anat 2013;35:343-9. [DOI: 10.1007/s00276-012-1048-2] [Cited by in Crossref: 28] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 29] [Article Influence: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis]