| 1 |
de Amorim dos Santos A, Ferreira e Silva MJ, Silva LE, Mendonça MC, Damásio RAP, Tonoli GHD. The use of enzymatic pre-treatment to facilitate and reduce the energy consumption of unbleached cellulose micro/nanofibrils production from Eucalyptus spp. and Pinus spp. kraft pulps. Eur J Wood Prod 2023. [DOI: 10.1007/s00107-023-01925-8] [Reference Citation Analysis]
|
| 2 |
Pennells J, Chaléat C, Martin DJ. Benchmarking the Production of Cellulose Nanofibres: Biomass Feedstock, Mechanical Processing, and Nanopaper Performance. J Polym Environ 2022. [DOI: 10.1007/s10924-022-02672-2] [Reference Citation Analysis]
|
| 3 |
Chai YD, Pang YL, Lim S, Chong WC, Lai CW, Abdullah AZ. Recent Progress on Tailoring the Biomass-Derived Cellulose Hybrid Composite Photocatalysts. Polymers (Basel) 2022;14. [PMID: 36501638 DOI: 10.3390/polym14235244] [Reference Citation Analysis]
|
| 4 |
Gulisano A, Dechesne A, Paulo M, Trindade LM. Investigating the potential of Andean lupin as a lignocellulosic feedstock for Europe: First genome‐wide association study on Lupinus mutabilis biomass quality. GCB Bioenergy 2022. [DOI: 10.1111/gcbb.13006] [Reference Citation Analysis]
|
| 5 |
Pennells J, Martin DJ. Statistical genetics concepts in biomass-based materials engineering. Front Bioeng Biotechnol 2022;10:1022948. [DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2022.1022948] [Reference Citation Analysis]
|
| 6 |
Babicka M, Woźniak M, Bartkowiak M, Peplińska B, Waliszewska H, Zborowska M, Borysiak S, Ratajczak I. Miscanthus and Sorghum as sustainable biomass sources for nanocellulose production. Industrial Crops and Products 2022;186:115177. [DOI: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2022.115177] [Cited by in Crossref: 2] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 2] [Article Influence: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis]
|
| 7 |
Pennells J, Chaléat C, Martin DJ. Benchmarking the Production of Cellulose Nanofibres: Biomass Feedstock, Mechanical Processing, and Nanopaper Performance.. [DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-1852780/v2] [Reference Citation Analysis]
|
| 8 |
Singh SK, Saulnier BK, Hodge DB. Lignin properties and cell wall response to deconstruction by alkaline pretreatment and enzymatic hydrolysis in brown midrib sorghums. Industrial Crops and Products 2022;178:114566. [DOI: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2022.114566] [Cited by in Crossref: 2] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 2] [Article Influence: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis]
|
| 9 |
Pennells J, Mellor V, Martin DJ. Novel Methodology to Visualize Biomass Processing Sustainability & Cellulose Nanofiber Product Quality. ACS Sustainable Chem Eng 2022;10:3623-32. [DOI: 10.1021/acssuschemeng.1c08476] [Cited by in Crossref: 4] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 4] [Article Influence: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis]
|
| 10 |
Afzal RA, Pennells J, Yamauchi Y, Annamalai PK, Nanjundan AK, Martin DJ. Lignocellulosic plant cell wall variation influences the structure and properties of hard carbon derived from sorghum biomass. Carbon Trends 2022;7:100168. [DOI: 10.1016/j.cartre.2022.100168] [Cited by in Crossref: 2] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 2] [Article Influence: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis]
|
| 11 |
Pennells J, Heuberger B, Chaléat C, Martin DJ. Assessing cellulose micro/nanofibre morphology using a high throughput fibre analysis device to predict nanopaper performance. Cellulose. [DOI: 10.1007/s10570-021-04405-5] [Cited by in Crossref: 4] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 4] [Article Influence: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis]
|
