BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Cited by in F6Publishing
For: Ciechanowicz S, Howle R, Heppolette C, Nakhjavani B, Carvalho B, Sultan P. Evaluation of the Obstetric Quality-of-Recovery score (ObsQoR-11) following non-elective caesarean delivery. International Journal of Obstetric Anesthesia 2019;39:51-9. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2019.01.010] [Cited by in Crossref: 10] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 11] [Article Influence: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis]
Number Citing Articles
1 Brinkler R, Edwards M. The association between primary language and quality of recovery following caesarean section: a prospective observational study. International Journal of Obstetric Anesthesia 2020;44:68-73. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2020.07.005] [Cited by in Crossref: 3] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 3] [Article Influence: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis]
2 Sultan P, Carvalho B. Postpartum recovery: what does it take to get back to a baseline? Current Opinion in Obstetrics & Gynecology 2021;33:86-93. [DOI: 10.1097/gco.0000000000000684] [Cited by in Crossref: 5] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 1] [Article Influence: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis]
3 Metodiev Y, Lucas D. The role of total intravenous anaesthesia for caesarean delivery. International Journal of Obstetric Anesthesia 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2022.103548] [Reference Citation Analysis]
4 Li XX, Li YM, Lv XL, Wang XH, Liu S. The efficacy and safety of intrathecal dexmedetomidine for parturients undergoing cesarean section: a double-blind randomized controlled trial. BMC Anesthesiol 2020;20:190. [PMID: 32746864 DOI: 10.1186/s12871-020-01109-4] [Reference Citation Analysis]
5 Sultan P, Kormendy F, Nishimura S, Carvalho B, Guo N, Papageorgiou C. Comparison of spontaneous versus operative vaginal delivery using Obstetric Quality of Recovery-10 (ObsQoR-10): An observational cohort study. Journal of Clinical Anesthesia 2020;63:109781. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2020.109781] [Cited by in Crossref: 8] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 8] [Article Influence: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis]
6 O’carroll J, Carvalho B, Sultan P. Enhancing recovery after cesarean delivery – A narrative review. Best Practice & Research Clinical Anaesthesiology 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.bpa.2022.01.001] [Reference Citation Analysis]
7 Bhiladvala C, Ffrench-O'Carroll R, Dadkhah Y, Bright S, Chau A, Seligman KM. Factors driving the difference in quality of recovery scores between scheduled and unscheduled Caesarean delivery patients. Br J Anaesth 2022:S0007-0912(21)00755-8. [PMID: 35012740 DOI: 10.1016/j.bja.2021.11.026] [Reference Citation Analysis]
8 Sultan P, Sadana N, Sharawi N, Blake L, El-Boghdadly K, Falvo A, Ciechanowicz S, Athar W, Shah R, Guo N, Jensen S, El-Sayed Y, Cella D, Carvalho B. Evaluation of Domains of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Recovery After Childbirth: A Scoping and Systematic Review. JAMA Netw Open 2020;3:e205540. [PMID: 32442292 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.5540] [Cited by in Crossref: 9] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 10] [Article Influence: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis]
9 Cook M, Kushelev M, Coffman J, Coffman J. Analgesic Outcomes in Opioid Use Disorder Patients Receiving Spinal Anesthesia with or without Intrathecal Clonidine for Cesarean Delivery: A Retrospective Investigation. JPR 2022;Volume 15:1191-201. [DOI: 10.2147/jpr.s358045] [Reference Citation Analysis]
10 Wilson RD, Nelson G. Maternal and fetal hypothermia: more preventive compliance is required for a mother and her fetus while undergoing cesarean delivery; a quality improvement review. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2021;:1-14. [PMID: 34689687 DOI: 10.1080/14767058.2021.1993816] [Reference Citation Analysis]
11 Sharawi N, Klima L, Shah R, Blake L, Carvalho B, Sultan P. Evaluation of patient‐reported outcome measures of functional recovery following caesarean section: a systematic review using the consensus‐based standards for the selection of health measurement instruments (COSMIN) checklist. Anaesthesia 2019;74:1439-55. [DOI: 10.1111/anae.14807] [Cited by in Crossref: 9] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 12] [Article Influence: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis]
12 Kumar S, Ashok V, Jain D, Arora A, Singh A, Sikka P. Validation of an obstetric quality of recovery scoring tool (ObsQoR-11) after elective caesarean delivery in a developing country: a prospective observational study. Int J Obstet Anesth 2021;:103235. [PMID: 34810053 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2021.103235] [Reference Citation Analysis]
13 Shalev S, Orbach-Zinger S, Sultan P, Guo N, Ronel I, Davis A, Weiniger CF. Obstetric quality of recovery scoring tool: assessment of validity, reliability and feasibility in an Israeli cesarean delivery population. Int J Obstet Anesth 2020;44:51. [PMID: 32799064 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2020.07.009] [Cited by in Crossref: 1] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 1] [Article Influence: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis]
14 Sangkum L, Thamjamrassri T, Arnuntasupakul V, Chalacheewa T. The Current Consideration, Approach, and Management in Postcesarean Delivery Pain Control: A Narrative Review. Anesthesiol Res Pract 2021;2021:2156918. [PMID: 34589125 DOI: 10.1155/2021/2156918] [Reference Citation Analysis]
15 Sultan P, Kamath N, Carvalho B, Bansal P, Elkhateb R, Dougan S, Whittington J, Guo N, El-sayed Y, Mhyre J, Sharawi N. Evaluation of inpatient postpartum recovery using the Obstetric Quality of Recovery-10 patient-reported outcome measure: a single-center observational study. American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology MFM 2020;2:100202. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2020.100202] [Cited by in Crossref: 4] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 5] [Article Influence: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis]
16 Sultan P, Jensen SE, Taylor J, El-Sayed Y, Carmichael S, Cella D, Angst MS, Gaudilliere B, Lyell DJ, Carvalho B. Proposed domains for assessing postpartum recovery: a concept elicitation study. BJOG 2021. [PMID: 34536324 DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.16937] [Reference Citation Analysis]
17 Sultan P, Sharawi N, Blake L, Ando K, Sultan E, Aghaeepour N, Carvalho B, Sadana N. Use of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures to Assess Outpatient Postpartum Recovery: A Systematic Review. JAMA Netw Open 2021;4:e2111600. [PMID: 34042993 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.11600] [Cited by in Crossref: 1] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 2] [Article Influence: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis]