BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Cited by in F6Publishing
For: von Renteln D, Robertson DJ, Bensen S, Pohl H. Prolonged cecal insertion time is associated with decreased adenoma detection. GastrointestEndosc. 2017;85:574-580. [PMID: 27590962 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2016.08.021] [Cited by in Crossref: 19] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 14] [Article Influence: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis]
Number Citing Articles
1 Goksoy B, Kiyak M, Karadag M, Yilmaz G, Azamat IF. Factors Affecting Cecal Intubation Time in Colonoscopy: Impact of Obesity. Cureus 2021;13:e15356. [PMID: 34094787 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.15356] [Reference Citation Analysis]
2 Gerges C, Neumann H Sr, Ishaq S, Sivanathan V, Galle PR, Neuhaus H, Neumann H. Evaluation of a novel colonoscope offering flexibility adjuster - a retrospective observational study. Therap Adv Gastroenterol 2021;14:17562848211013494. [PMID: 34104209 DOI: 10.1177/17562848211013494] [Reference Citation Analysis]
3 Fritz CDL, Smith ZL, Elsner J, Hollander T, Early D, Kushnir V. Prolonged Cecal Insertion Time Is Not Associated with Decreased Adenoma Detection When a Longer Withdrawal Time Is Achieved. Dig Dis Sci 2018;63:3120-5. [DOI: 10.1007/s10620-018-5100-x] [Cited by in Crossref: 4] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 2] [Article Influence: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis]
4 Katayama Y. Is it enough to consider the number of endoscopy cases to evaluate colon adenoma detection rates? Gastrointest Endosc 2021;93:1204-5. [PMID: 33875153 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2021.01.028] [Cited by in Crossref: 1] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 1] [Article Influence: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis]
5 Goksoy B, Kiyak M. The effectiveness of using an abdominal binder during colonoscopy: a randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled trial. Scand J Gastroenterol 2021;56:990-7. [PMID: 34154490 DOI: 10.1080/00365521.2021.1941238] [Reference Citation Analysis]
6 Wen Q, Liu KJ, Cui BT, Li P, Wu X, Zhong M, Wei L, Tu H, Yuan Y, Lin D, Hsu WH, Wu DC, Yin H, Zhang FM. Impact of cap-assisted colonoscopy during transendoscopic enteral tubing: A randomized controlled trial. World J Gastroenterol 2020;26:6098-110. [PMID: 33132658 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v26.i39.6098] [Cited by in CrossRef: 1] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 1] [Article Influence: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis]
7 Eckardt AJ, Kheder J, Basil A, Silverstein T, Patel K, Mahmoud M, Al-Azzawi Y, Ellis D, Gillespie W, Carrasquillo Vega Y, Person SD, Levey JM. Trainee participation during screening colonoscopy does not affect ADR at subsequent surveillance, but may result in early follow-up. Endosc Int Open 2020;8:E1732-40. [PMID: 33269304 DOI: 10.1055/a-1244-1859] [Cited by in Crossref: 1] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 1] [Article Influence: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis]
8 Zhao SB, Yang X, Fang J, Wang SL, Gu L, Xia T, Su XJ, Wang D, Li ZS, Bai Y. Effect of left lateral tilt-down position on cecal intubation time: a 2-center, pragmatic, randomized controlled trial. Gastrointest Endosc 2018;87:852-61. [PMID: 29158180 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2017.11.012] [Cited by in Crossref: 3] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 3] [Article Influence: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis]
9 Jaruvongvanich V, Sempokuya T, Laoveeravat P, Ungprasert P. Risk factors associated with longer cecal intubation time: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Colorectal Dis 2018;33:359-65. [PMID: 29520457 DOI: 10.1007/s00384-018-3014-x] [Cited by in Crossref: 10] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 6] [Article Influence: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis]
10 Lin SY, Yaow CYL, Ng CH, Wong NW, Tham HY, Chong CS. Different position from traditional left lateral for colonoscopy? A meta-analysis and systematic review of randomized control trials. Chronic Dis Transl Med 2021;7:27-34. [PMID: 34013177 DOI: 10.1016/j.cdtm.2020.09.002] [Reference Citation Analysis]
11 Chandan S, Mohan BP, Khan SR, Bhogal N, Ramai D, Bilal M, Aziz M, Shah AR, Mashiana HS, Jha LK, Bhat I, Singh S, Adler DG. Adenoma and polyp detection rates during insertion versus withdrawal phase of colonoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Gastrointest Endosc 2021;93:68-76.e2. [PMID: 32540312 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2020.06.015] [Cited by in Crossref: 3] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 4] [Article Influence: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis]
12 Barakat M, Panchal A, Abdelfatah MM, Elhanafi S, Carr-locke DL, Othman MO. Morning versus afternoon adenoma detection rate: a systematic review and meta-analysis. European Journal of Gastroenterology & Hepatology 2020;32:467-74. [DOI: 10.1097/meg.0000000000001596] [Cited by in Crossref: 1] [Article Influence: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis]
13 Hsieh Y, Leung FW. An overview of deep learning algorithms and water exchange in colonoscopy in improving adenoma detection. Expert Review of Gastroenterology & Hepatology 2019;13:1153-60. [DOI: 10.1080/17474124.2019.1694903] [Cited by in Crossref: 6] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 4] [Article Influence: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis]
14 Cheng C, Kuo Y, Liu N, Tang J, Fan J, Lin C, Tsui Y, Lee B, Hung H. Comparison of polyp detection during both insertion and withdrawal versus only withdrawal of colonoscopy: A prospective randomized trial: Insertion polypectomy. Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology 2019;34:1377-83. [DOI: 10.1111/jgh.14613] [Cited by in Crossref: 6] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 4] [Article Influence: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis]