BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Cited by in F6Publishing
For: Zhang ZY, Wang D, Ni JM, Yu XR, Zhang L, Wu WJ, Gong L, Hu MH. Comparison of three-dimensional negative-contrast CT cholangiopancreatography with three-dimensional MR cholangiopancreatography for the diagnosis of obstructive biliary diseases. Eur J Radiol. 2012;81:830-837. [PMID: 21377820 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2011.02.036] [Cited by in Crossref: 10] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 8] [Article Influence: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis]
Number Citing Articles
1 Wu XP, Ni JM, Zhang ZY, Lu FQ, Li B, Jin HH, Dai T. Preoperative Evaluation of Malignant Perihilar Biliary Obstruction: Negative-Contrast CT Cholangiopancreatography and CT Angiography Versus MRCP and MR Angiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2015;205:780-8. [PMID: 26397326 DOI: 10.2214/AJR.14.13983] [Cited by in Crossref: 9] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 4] [Article Influence: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis]
2 Li Q, Wei Y, Che F, Zhang T, Yao S, Zhao J, Zhang Y, Tang H, Song B. Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging Improves the Prognostic Outcomes in Patients With Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma After Curative-Intent Resection. Front Oncol 2022;12:756726. [PMID: 35356226 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.756726] [Reference Citation Analysis]
3 Luersen GF, Bhosale P, Szklaruk J. State-of-the-art cross-sectional liver imaging: beyond lesion detection and characterization. J Hepatocell Carcinoma 2015;2:101-17. [PMID: 27508199 DOI: 10.2147/JHC.S85201] [Cited by in Crossref: 1] [Article Influence: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis]
4 Li B, Zhang L, Zhang Z, Ni J, Lu F, Wu W, Jiang C. Differentiation of noncalculous periampullary obstruction: comparison of CT with negative-contrast CT cholangiopancreatography versus MRI with MR cholangiopancreatography. Eur Radiol 2015;25:391-401. [DOI: 10.1007/s00330-014-3430-4] [Cited by in Crossref: 7] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 6] [Article Influence: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis]
5 Ding Y, Rao SX, Chen C, Li R, Zeng MS. Potential of Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MR imaging for evaluation of bile duct ligation-induced liver injury in rabbits. Hepatol Int. 2015;9:303-309. [PMID: 25788184 DOI: 10.1007/s12072-014-9595-8] [Cited by in Crossref: 3] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 4] [Article Influence: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis]
6 Kim SC, Kim JH, Choi SH, Yun TJ, Wi JY, Kim SA, Sun HY, Ryoo I, Park SW, Sohn CH. Off-site evaluation of three-dimensional ultrasound for the diagnosis of thyroid nodules: comparison with two-dimensional ultrasound. Eur Radiol 2016;26:3353-60. [PMID: 26795614 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-015-4193-2] [Cited by in Crossref: 6] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 7] [Article Influence: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis]
7 Tomizawa M, Shinozaki F, Hasegawa R, Shirai Y, Motoyoshi Y, Sugiyama T, Yamamoto S, Ishige N. Comparison of acute cholangitis with or without common bile duct dilatation. Exp Ther Med. 2017;13:3497-3502. [PMID: 28587432 DOI: 10.3892/etm.2017.4401] [Cited by in Crossref: 2] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 1] [Article Influence: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis]
8 Wang F, Ni J, Zhang Z, Zhang L, Wu W, Wang D, Ji Y, Gong L. Differential diagnosis of periampullary carcinomas: comparison of CT with negative-contrast CT cholangiopancreatography versus MRI with MR cholangiopancreatography. Abdom Imaging 2014;39:506-17. [DOI: 10.1007/s00261-014-0085-1] [Cited by in Crossref: 4] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 3] [Article Influence: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis]
9 Chen W, Mo JJ, Lin L, Li CQ, Zhang JF. Diagnostic value of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in choledocholithiasis. World J Gastroenterol 2015; 21(11): 3351-3360 [PMID: 25805944 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i11.3351] [Cited by in CrossRef: 30] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 17] [Article Influence: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis]
10 Giljaca V, Gurusamy KS, Takwoingi Y, Higgie D, Poropat G, Štimac D, Davidson BR. Endoscopic ultrasound versus magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography for common bile duct stones. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2015;:CD011549. [PMID: 25719224 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD011549] [Cited by in Crossref: 46] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 23] [Article Influence: 6.6] [Reference Citation Analysis]