BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Cited by in F6Publishing
For: Imberger GL, Mcgain F. GRADE quality of evidence: a systematic and objective assessment, not an expression of opinion. Comment on Br J Anaesth 2019; 122: 587–604. British Journal of Anaesthesia 2019;123:e479-80. [DOI: 10.1016/j.bja.2019.06.008] [Cited by in Crossref: 2] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 2] [Article Influence: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis]
Number Citing Articles
1 Buhre W, Disma N, Hendrickx J, De Hert S, Hollmann MW, Huhn R, Jakobsson J, Nagele P, Peyton P, Vutskits L. Response to comments on ‘The European Society of Anaesthesiology Task Force review on the place of nitrous oxide in current clinical practice’ (Br J Anaesth 2019; 122:587–604). British Journal of Anaesthesia 2019;123:e482-3. [DOI: 10.1016/j.bja.2019.06.021] [Cited by in Crossref: 3] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 3] [Article Influence: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis]
2 Granholm A, Alhazzani W, Møller MH. Use of the GRADE approach in systematic reviews and guidelines. British Journal of Anaesthesia 2019;123:554-9. [DOI: 10.1016/j.bja.2019.08.015] [Cited by in Crossref: 12] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 10] [Article Influence: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis]