BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Cited by in F6Publishing
For: Dauser B, Winkler T, Loncsar G, Herbst F. Compression Anastomosis Revisited: Prospective Audit of Short- and Medium-term Outcomes in 62 Rectal Anastomoses. World J Surg 2011;35:1925-32. [DOI: 10.1007/s00268-011-1135-2] [Cited by in Crossref: 9] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 8] [Article Influence: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis]
Number Citing Articles
1 Berho M, Wexner SD, Botero-Anug AM, Pelled D, Fleshman JW. Histopathologic advantages of compression ring anastomosis healing as compared with stapled anastomosis in a porcine model: A blinded comparative study. Dis Colon Rectum. 2014;57:506-513. [PMID: 24608308 DOI: 10.1097/dcr.0000000000000009] [Cited by in Crossref: 9] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 6] [Article Influence: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis]
2 Zbar AP, Nir Y, Weizman A, Rabau M, Senagore A. Compression anastomoses in colorectal surgery: a review. Tech Coloproctol. 2012;16:187-199. [PMID: 22534832 DOI: 10.1007/s10151-012-0825-6] [Cited by in Crossref: 23] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 18] [Article Influence: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis]
3 Vanbrugghe C, Birnbaum DJ, Berdah SV. Experimental Procedure of Compression Anastomosis Using Fragmented Rings: A Porcine Model. Surg Innov 2017;24:233-9. [PMID: 28492355 DOI: 10.1177/1553350617693125] [Reference Citation Analysis]
4 Kwag SJ, Kim JG, Kang WK, Lee JK, Oh ST. Niti CAR 27 Versus a Conventional End-to-End Anastomosis Stapler in a Laparoscopic Anterior Resection for Sigmoid Colon Cancer. Ann Coloproctol 2014;30:77-82. [PMID: 24851217 DOI: 10.3393/ac.2014.30.2.77] [Cited by in Crossref: 4] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 3] [Article Influence: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis]
5 Lu Z, Peng J, Li C, Wang F, Jiang W, Fan W, Lin J, Wu X, Wan D, Pan Z. Efficacy and safety of a NiTi CAR 27 compression ring for end-to-end anastomosis compared with conventional staplers: A real-world analysis in Chinese colorectal cancer patients. Clinics (Sao Paulo) 2016;71:264-70. [PMID: 27276395 DOI: 10.6061/clinics/2016(05)04] [Cited by in Crossref: 4] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 3] [Article Influence: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis]
6 Dauser B, Herbst F. Diagnosis, management and outcome of early anastomotic leakage following colorectal anastomosis using a compression device: is it different? Colorectal Dis 2014;16:O435-9. [PMID: 25132419 DOI: 10.1111/codi.12742] [Cited by in Crossref: 2] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 1] [Article Influence: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis]
7 Kopelman D, Kopelman Y, Peled D, Willenz U, Zmora O, Wasserberg N. Healing of ileocolic nitinol compression anastomosis: a novel porcine model of subtotal colectomy. Surg Innov 2013;20:570-9. [PMID: 23575914 DOI: 10.1177/1553350613484592] [Reference Citation Analysis]
8 Dauser B, Braunschmid T, Ghaffari S, Riss S, Stift A, Herbst F. Anastomotic leakage after low anterior resection for rectal cancer: comparison of stapled versus compression anastomosis. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2013;398:957-64. [PMID: 23943311 DOI: 10.1007/s00423-013-1103-4] [Cited by in Crossref: 11] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 11] [Article Influence: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis]
9 Li NN, Zhao WT, Wu XT. Can a nickel-titanium memory-shape device serve as a substitute for the stapler in gastrointestinal anastomosis? A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Surg Res 2016;201:82-93. [PMID: 26850188 DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2015.10.019] [Cited by in Crossref: 2] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 3] [Article Influence: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis]
10 Park A, Lee TH, Kavic SM. Long-term follow-up of a novel anastomotic device in a canine model. Surg Innov 2014;21:198-203. [PMID: 24752074 DOI: 10.1177/1553350614530189] [Reference Citation Analysis]