BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Cited by in F6Publishing
For: Slomka PJ, Baum RP. Multimodality image registration with software: state-of-the-art. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2009;36:44-55. [DOI: 10.1007/s00259-008-0941-8] [Cited by in Crossref: 68] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 46] [Article Influence: 4.9] [Reference Citation Analysis]
Number Citing Articles
1 Koulouri A, Rimpiläinen V, Brookes M, Kaipio JP. Compensation of domain modelling errors in the inverse source problem of the Poisson equation: Application in electroencephalographic imaging. Applied Numerical Mathematics 2016;106:24-36. [DOI: 10.1016/j.apnum.2016.01.005] [Cited by in Crossref: 8] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 2] [Article Influence: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis]
2 Chehab MA, Brinjikji W, Copelan A, Venkatesan AM. Navigational Tools for Interventional Radiology and Interventional Oncology Applications. Semin Intervent Radiol 2015;32:416-27. [PMID: 26622105 DOI: 10.1055/s-0035-1564705] [Cited by in Crossref: 21] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 19] [Article Influence: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis]
3 Shi X, Jiang J. Automatic Registration Method for Optical Remote Sensing Images with Large Background Variations Using Line Segments. Remote Sensing 2016;8:426. [DOI: 10.3390/rs8050426] [Cited by in Crossref: 16] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 4] [Article Influence: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis]
4 Nensa F, Beiderwellen K, Heusch P, Wetter A. Clinical applications of PET/MRI: current status and future perspectives. Diagn Interv Radiol 2014;20:438-47. [PMID: 25010371 DOI: 10.5152/dir.2014.14008] [Cited by in Crossref: 69] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 49] [Article Influence: 9.9] [Reference Citation Analysis]
5 Erlandsson K, Buvat I, Pretorius PH, Thomas BA, Hutton BF. A review of partial volume correction techniques for emission tomography and their applications in neurology, cardiology and oncology. Phys Med Biol 2012;57:R119-59. [DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/57/21/r119] [Cited by in Crossref: 280] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 106] [Article Influence: 28.0] [Reference Citation Analysis]
6 Oliveira FP, Tavares JM. Medical image registration: a review. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin 2014;17:73-93. [PMID: 22435355 DOI: 10.1080/10255842.2012.670855] [Cited by in Crossref: 331] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 146] [Article Influence: 33.1] [Reference Citation Analysis]
7 Varoquaux A, Rager O, Dulguerov P, Burkhardt K, Ailianou A, Becker M. Diffusion-weighted and PET/MR Imaging after Radiation Therapy for Malignant Head and Neck Tumors. Radiographics. 2015;35:1502-1527. [PMID: 26252192 DOI: 10.1148/rg.2015140029] [Cited by in Crossref: 36] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 29] [Article Influence: 5.1] [Reference Citation Analysis]
8 Gondim Teixeira PA, Hossu G, Lecocq S, Razeto M, Louis M, Blum A. Bone Marrow Edema Pattern Identification in Patients With Lytic Bone Lesions Using Digital Subtraction Angiography–Like Bone Subtraction on Large-Area Detector Computed Tomography: . Investigative Radiology 2014;49:156-64. [DOI: 10.1097/rli.0000000000000007] [Cited by in Crossref: 9] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 2] [Article Influence: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis]
9 Steffen IG, Hofheinz F, Rogasch JM, Furth C, Amthauer H, Ruf J. Influence of rigid coregistration of PET and CT data on metabolic volumetry: a user's perspective. EJNMMI Res 2013;3:85. [PMID: 24369858 DOI: 10.1186/2191-219X-3-85] [Reference Citation Analysis]
10 Torigian DA, Zaidi H, Kwee TC, Saboury B, Udupa JK, Cho ZH, Alavi A. PET/MR imaging: technical aspects and potential clinical applications. Radiology. 2013;267:26-44. [PMID: 23525716 DOI: 10.1148/radiol.13121038] [Cited by in Crossref: 151] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 117] [Article Influence: 16.8] [Reference Citation Analysis]
11 von Schulthess GK, Burger C. Integrating imaging modalities: what makes sense from a workflow perspective? Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2010;37:980-90. [PMID: 20140613 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-009-1378-4] [Cited by in Crossref: 23] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 20] [Article Influence: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis]
12 Konukoglu E, Glocker B, Ye DH, Criminisi A, Pohl KM. Discriminative segmentation-based evaluation through shape dissimilarity. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2012;31:2278-89. [PMID: 22955890 DOI: 10.1109/TMI.2012.2216281] [Cited by in Crossref: 5] [Article Influence: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis]
13 Keszei AP, Berkels B, Deserno TM. Survey of Non-Rigid Registration Tools in Medicine. J Digit Imaging 2017;30:102-16. [PMID: 27730414 DOI: 10.1007/s10278-016-9915-8] [Cited by in Crossref: 31] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 14] [Article Influence: 7.8] [Reference Citation Analysis]
14 Huhdanpaa H, Hwang DH, Gasparian GG, Booker MT, Cen Y, Lerner A, Boyko OB, Go JL, Kim PE, Rajamohan A, Law M, Shiroishi MS. Image coregistration: quantitative processing framework for the assessment of brain lesions. J Digit Imaging 2014;27:369-79. [PMID: 24395597 DOI: 10.1007/s10278-013-9655-y] [Cited by in Crossref: 6] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 3] [Article Influence: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis]
15 Pan T, Zaidi H. Attenuation Correction Strategies for Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography and 4-Dimensional Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography. PET Clin 2013;8:37-50. [PMID: 27157814 DOI: 10.1016/j.cpet.2012.09.009] [Cited by in Crossref: 8] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 4] [Article Influence: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis]
16 Woo J, Dey D, Cheng VY, Hong BW, Ramesh A, Sundaramoorthi G, Nakazato R, Berman DS, Germano G, Kuo CC, Slomka PJ. Nonlinear registration of serial coronary CT angiography (CCTA) for assessment of changes in atherosclerotic plaque. Med Phys 2010;37:885-96. [PMID: 20229898 DOI: 10.1118/1.3284541] [Cited by in Crossref: 2] [Article Influence: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis]
17 Zaidi H, Pan T. Recent Advances in Hybrid Imaging for Radiation Therapy Planning: The Cutting Edge. PET Clinics 2011;6:207-26. [DOI: 10.1016/j.cpet.2011.02.009] [Cited by in Crossref: 2] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 1] [Article Influence: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis]
18 Verberne HJ, Acampa W, Anagnostopoulos C, Ballinger J, Bengel F, De Bondt P, Buechel RR, Cuocolo A, van Eck-Smit BL, Flotats A, Hacker M, Hindorf C, Kaufmann PA, Lindner O, Ljungberg M, Lonsdale M, Manrique A, Minarik D, Scholte AJ, Slart RH, Trägårdh E, de Wit TC, Hesse B; European Association of Nuclear Medicine (EANM). EANM procedural guidelines for radionuclide myocardial perfusion imaging with SPECT and SPECT/CT: 2015 revision. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2015;42:1929-40. [PMID: 26290421 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-015-3139-x] [Cited by in Crossref: 165] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 101] [Article Influence: 23.6] [Reference Citation Analysis]
19 Lu L, Ma J, Feng Q, Chen W, Rahmim A. Anatomy-guided brain PET imaging incorporating a joint prior model. Phys Med Biol 2015;60:2145-66. [PMID: 25683483 DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/60/6/2145] [Cited by in Crossref: 12] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 7] [Article Influence: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis]
20 Yan J, Lim JC, Townsend DW. MRI-guided brain PET image filtering and partial volume correction. Phys Med Biol 2015;60:961-76. [DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/60/3/961] [Cited by in Crossref: 33] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 29] [Article Influence: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis]
21 da Cunha MML, Trepout S, Messaoudi C, Wu T, Ortega R, Guerquin-kern J, Marco S. Overview of chemical imaging methods to address biological questions. Micron 2016;84:23-36. [DOI: 10.1016/j.micron.2016.02.005] [Cited by in Crossref: 33] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 25] [Article Influence: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis]
22 Senthamizhchelvan S, Zaidi H. Novel Quantitative Techniques in Hybrid (PET-MR) Imaging of Brain Tumors. PET Clin 2013;8:219-32. [PMID: 27157949 DOI: 10.1016/j.cpet.2012.09.007] [Cited by in Crossref: 4] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 4] [Article Influence: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis]
23 Woo J, Slomka PJ, Dey D, Cheng VY, Hong BW, Ramesh A, Berman DS, Karlsberg RP, Kuo CC, Germano G. Geometric feature-based multimodal image registration of contrast-enhanced cardiac CT with gated myocardial perfusion SPECT. Med Phys 2009;36:5467-79. [PMID: 20095259 DOI: 10.1118/1.3253301] [Cited by in Crossref: 17] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 13] [Article Influence: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis]
24 Zaidi H, Montandon ML, Assal F. Structure-Function-Based Quantitative Brain Image Analysis. PET Clin 2010;5:155-68. [PMID: 27157670 DOI: 10.1016/j.cpet.2010.02.003] [Cited by in Crossref: 6] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 8] [Article Influence: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis]
25 Fedorov A, Wells WM, Kikinis R, Tempany CM, Vangel MG. Application of tolerance limits to the characterization of image registration performance. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2014;33:1541-50. [PMID: 24759985 DOI: 10.1109/TMI.2014.2317796] [Cited by in Crossref: 2] [Article Influence: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis]
26 Yankeelov TE, Gore JC. Has quantitative multimodal imaging of treatment response arrived? Clin Cancer Res 2009;15:6473-5. [PMID: 19861463 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-09-2257] [Cited by in Crossref: 2] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 1] [Article Influence: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis]
27 Yang EY, Polsani VR, Washburn MJ, Zang W, Hall AL, Virani SS, Hodge MD, Parker D, Kerwin WS, Lawrie GM, Garami Z, Ballantyne CM, Morrisett JD, Nambi V. Real-time co-registration using novel ultrasound technology: ex vivo validation and in vivo applications. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2011;24:720-8. [PMID: 21439782 DOI: 10.1016/j.echo.2011.02.003] [Cited by in Crossref: 11] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 7] [Article Influence: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis]
28 Abi-Jaoudeh N, Kobeiter H, Xu S, Wood BJ. Image fusion during vascular and nonvascular image-guided procedures. Tech Vasc Interv Radiol 2013;16:168-76. [PMID: 23993079 DOI: 10.1053/j.tvir.2013.02.012] [Cited by in Crossref: 30] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 24] [Article Influence: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis]
29 Ng TS, Procissi D, Wu Y, Jacobs RE. A robust coregistration method for in vivo studies using a first generation simultaneous PET/MR scanner. Med Phys 2010;37:1995-2003. [PMID: 20527533 DOI: 10.1118/1.3369447] [Cited by in Crossref: 11] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 10] [Article Influence: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis]
30 Foley D, Browne JE, Zhuang X, Sheane B, O'Driscoll D, Cannon D, Sheehy N, Meaney JF, Fagan AJ. The utility of deformable image registration for small artery visualisation in contrast-enhanced whole body MR angiography. Phys Med 2014;30:898-908. [PMID: 25182374 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2014.08.001] [Cited by in Crossref: 2] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 2] [Article Influence: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis]
31 Erlandsson K, Dickson J, Arridge S, Atkinson D, Ourselin S, Hutton BF. MR Imaging–Guided Partial Volume Correction of PET Data in PET/MR Imaging. PET Clinics 2016;11:161-77. [DOI: 10.1016/j.cpet.2015.09.002] [Cited by in Crossref: 25] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 21] [Article Influence: 4.2] [Reference Citation Analysis]
32 Khalil MM. Elements of Gamma Camera and SPECT Systems. In: Khalil MM, editor. Basic Sciences of Nuclear Medicine. Berlin: Springer Berlin Heidelberg; 2011. pp. 155-78. [DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-85962-8_10] [Cited by in Crossref: 1] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 1] [Article Influence: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis]
33 Giovanella L, Lucignani G. Hybrid versus fusion imaging: are we moving forward judiciously? Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2010;37:973-9. [PMID: 20145920 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-010-1389-1] [Cited by in Crossref: 8] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 3] [Article Influence: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis]
34 Zuckier LS. Hybrid imaging in planar scintigraphy: new implementations and historical precedents. Semin Nucl Med 2012;42:62-72. [PMID: 22117814 DOI: 10.1053/j.semnuclmed.2011.08.001] [Cited by in Crossref: 4] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 2] [Article Influence: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis]
35 Debnam JM, Chi TL, Ketonen L, Mahfouz YM, Guha-Thakurta N. Co-registration of Sequential Multidetector Computed Tomography Studies for the Evaluation of Surgical Instrumentation following Resection of Spinal Tumors. Case Rep Radiol 2011;2011:676410. [PMID: 22606553 DOI: 10.1155/2011/676410] [Cited by in Crossref: 1] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 1] [Article Influence: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis]
36 Danad I, Raijmakers PG, Knaapen P. Diagnosing coronary artery disease with hybrid PET/CT: it takes two to tango. J Nucl Cardiol 2013;20:874-90. [PMID: 23842709 DOI: 10.1007/s12350-013-9753-8] [Cited by in Crossref: 40] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 29] [Article Influence: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis]
37 Kiefer A, Kuwert T, Hahn D, Hornegger J, Uder M, Ritt P. Anatomical accuracy of abdominal lesion localization: Retrospective automatic rigid image registration between FDG-PET and MRI. Nuklearmedizin 2017;50:147-54. [DOI: 10.3413/nukmed-0364] [Cited by in Crossref: 7] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 6] [Article Influence: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis]
38 Grgic A, Ballek E, Fleckenstein J, Moca N, Kremp S, Schaefer A, Kuhnigk J, Rübe C, Kirsch C, Hellwig D. Impact of rigid and nonrigid registration on the determination of 18F-FDG PET-based tumour volume and standardized uptake value in patients with lung cancer. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2011;38:856-64. [DOI: 10.1007/s00259-010-1719-3] [Cited by in Crossref: 5] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 4] [Article Influence: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis]
39 Jin S, Li D, Wang H, Yin Y. Registration of PET and CT images based on multiresolution gradient of mutual information demons algorithm for positioning esophageal cancer patients. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2013;14:3931. [PMID: 23318381 DOI: 10.1120/jacmp.v14i1.3931] [Cited by in Crossref: 12] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 4] [Article Influence: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis]
40 Kotsas P, Dodd T. Rigid registration of medical images using 1D and 2D binary projections. J Digit Imaging 2011;24:913-25. [PMID: 21086018 DOI: 10.1007/s10278-010-9352-z] [Reference Citation Analysis]
41 Paparo F, Piccardo A, Bacigalupo L, Piccazzo R, Rollandi L, Galletto Pregliasco A, Filauro M, DeCensi A, Rollandi GA. Multimodality fusion imaging in abdominal and pelvic malignancies: current applications and future perspectives. Abdom Imaging 2015;40:2723-37. [PMID: 25952574 DOI: 10.1007/s00261-015-0435-7] [Cited by in Crossref: 6] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 6] [Article Influence: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis]
42 Alves RS, Tavares JMRS. Computer Image Registration Techniques Applied to Nuclear Medicine Images. In: Tavares JMRS, Natal Jorge R, editors. Computational and Experimental Biomedical Sciences: Methods and Applications. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2015. pp. 173-91. [DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-15799-3_13] [Cited by in Crossref: 16] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 2] [Article Influence: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis]
43 Zaidi H, El Naqa I. PET-guided delineation of radiation therapy treatment volumes: a survey of image segmentation techniques. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2010;37:2165-2187. [PMID: 20336455 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-010-1423-3] [Cited by in Crossref: 260] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 192] [Article Influence: 21.7] [Reference Citation Analysis]
44 Beyer T, Freudenberg LS, Townsend DW, Czernin J. The future of hybrid imaging-part 1: hybrid imaging technologies and SPECT/CT. Insights Imaging 2011;2:161-9. [PMID: 23099842 DOI: 10.1007/s13244-010-0063-2] [Cited by in Crossref: 33] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 26] [Article Influence: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis]
45 Piccinelli M, Cooke DC, Garcia EV. Multimodality Image Fusion for Coronary Artery Disease Detection: Concepts and Latest Developments. Ann Nucl Cardiol 2018;4:74-8. [PMID: 31890460 DOI: 10.17996/anc.18-00065] [Cited by in Crossref: 1] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 1] [Article Influence: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis]
46 Yoon SH, Goo JM, Lee SM, Park CM, Cheon GJ. PET/MR Imaging for Chest Diseases. Magnetic Resonance Imaging Clinics of North America 2015;23:245-59. [DOI: 10.1016/j.mric.2015.01.008] [Cited by in Crossref: 6] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 4] [Article Influence: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis]
47 Flotats A, Knuuti J, Gutberlet M, Marcassa C, Bengel FM, Kaufmann PA, Rees MR, Hesse B; Cardiovascular Committee of the EANM, the ESCR and the ECNC. Hybrid cardiac imaging: SPECT/CT and PET/CT. A joint position statement by the European Association of Nuclear Medicine (EANM), the European Society of Cardiac Radiology (ESCR) and the European Council of Nuclear Cardiology (ECNC). Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2011;38:201-12. [PMID: 20717824 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-010-1586-y] [Cited by in Crossref: 122] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 77] [Article Influence: 11.1] [Reference Citation Analysis]
48 Piccinelli M, Garcia E. Multimodality image fusion for diagnosing coronary artery disease. J Biomed Res 2013;27:439-51. [PMID: 24285942 DOI: 10.7555/JBR.27.20130138] [Cited by in Crossref: 4] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 5] [Article Influence: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis]
49 Liao Y, Sun Y, Guo W, Chou Y, Hsieh J, Wu Y. A hybrid strategy to integrate surface-based and mutual-information-based methods for co-registering brain SPECT and MR images. Med Biol Eng Comput 2011;49:671-85. [DOI: 10.1007/s11517-010-0724-9] [Cited by in Crossref: 4] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 3] [Article Influence: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis]
50 Rimpiläinen V, Koulouri A, Lucka F, Kaipio JP, Wolters CH. Improved EEG source localization with Bayesian uncertainty modelling of unknown skull conductivity. Neuroimage 2019;188:252-60. [PMID: 30529398 DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.11.058] [Cited by in Crossref: 5] [Article Influence: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis]
51 Nakazato R, Dey D, Alexánderson E, Meave A, Jiménez M, Romero E, Jácome R, Peña M, Berman DS, Slomka PJ. Automatic alignment of myocardial perfusion PET and 64-slice coronary CT angiography on hybrid PET/CT. J Nucl Cardiol 2012;19:482-91. [PMID: 22419224 DOI: 10.1007/s12350-012-9528-7] [Cited by in Crossref: 15] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 8] [Article Influence: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis]