BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Cited by in F6Publishing
For: Kubota T, Yamada K, Kizu O, Hirota T, Ito H, Ishihara K, Nishimura T. Relationship between contrast enhancement on fluid-attenuated inversion recovery MR sequences and signal intensity on T2-weighted MR images: visual evaluation of brain tumors. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2005;21:694-700. [PMID: 15906343 DOI: 10.1002/jmri.20331] [Cited by in Crossref: 14] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 11] [Article Influence: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis]
Number Citing Articles
1 Bagnato F. Uncovering and characterizing multiple sclerosis lesions: the aid of fluid-attenuated inversion recovery images in the presence of gadolinium contrast agent. J Neuroimaging 2009;19:201-4. [PMID: 19187471 DOI: 10.1111/j.1552-6569.2008.00350.x] [Cited by in Crossref: 2] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 2] [Article Influence: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis]
2 Herrera DA, Franco S, Bustamante S, Vargas SA, Ochoa-escudero M, Dublin AB, Cuevas M. Contrast-enhanced T2-FLAIR MR imaging in patients with uveitis. Int Ophthalmol 2017;37:507-12. [DOI: 10.1007/s10792-016-0289-1] [Cited by in Crossref: 3] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 1] [Article Influence: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis]
3 Wu T, Zheng WL, Zhang SZ, Sun JH, Yuan H. Bimodal visualization of colorectal uptake of nanoparticles in dimethylhydrazine-treated mice. World J Gastroenterol 2011; 17(31): 3614-3622 [PMID: 21987608 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v17.i31.3614] [Cited by in CrossRef: 5] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 6] [Article Influence: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis]
4 Merhof K, Lang J, Dürr S, Stahl C, Gorgas D. Use of contrast-enhanced fluid-attenuated inversion recovery sequence to detect brain lesions in dogs and cats. J Vet Intern Med 2014;28:1263-7. [PMID: 24962604 DOI: 10.1111/jvim.12384] [Cited by in Crossref: 2] [Article Influence: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis]
5 Bruzzone MG, Eoli M, Cuccarini V, Grisoli M, Valletta L, Finocchiaro G. Genetic signature of adult gliomas and correlation with MRI features. Expert Rev Mol Diagn 2009;9:709-20. [PMID: 19817555 DOI: 10.1586/erm.09.44] [Cited by in Crossref: 9] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 9] [Article Influence: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis]
6 Hu LS, Hawkins-Daarud A, Wang L, Li J, Swanson KR. Imaging of intratumoral heterogeneity in high-grade glioma. Cancer Lett 2020;477:97-106. [PMID: 32112907 DOI: 10.1016/j.canlet.2020.02.025] [Cited by in Crossref: 9] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 9] [Article Influence: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis]
7 Nazarpoor M, Poureisa M, Daghighi MH. Comparison of maximum signal intensity of contrast agent on t1-weighted images using spin echo, fast spin echo and inversion recovery sequences. Iran J Radiol 2012;10:27-32. [PMID: 23599710 DOI: 10.5812/iranjradiol.5452] [Cited by in Crossref: 8] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 6] [Article Influence: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis]
8 Wang Y, Wang K, Wang J, Li S, Ma J, Dai J, Jiang T. Identifying the association between contrast enhancement pattern, surgical resection, and prognosis in anaplastic glioma patients. Neuroradiology 2016;58:367-74. [PMID: 26795126 DOI: 10.1007/s00234-016-1640-y] [Cited by in Crossref: 13] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 11] [Article Influence: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis]
9 Zhou Z, Shen T, Chen X, Peng W. Diagnostic value of contrast-enhanced fluid-attenuated inversion-recovery MRI for intracranial tumors in comparison with post-contrast T1W spin-echo MRI: . Chinese Medical Journal 2006;119:467-73. [DOI: 10.1097/00029330-200603020-00006] [Cited by in Crossref: 10] [Article Influence: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis]
10 Chatain GP, Patronas N, Smirniotopoulos JG, Piazza M, Benzo S, Ray-Chaudhury A, Sharma S, Lodish M, Nieman L, Stratakis CA, Chittiboina P. Potential utility of FLAIR in MRI-negative Cushing's disease. J Neurosurg 2018;129:620-8. [PMID: 29027863 DOI: 10.3171/2017.4.JNS17234] [Cited by in Crossref: 11] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 4] [Article Influence: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis]
11 Morris JM, Miller GM. Increased signal in the subarachnoid space on fluid-attenuated inversion recovery imaging associated with the clearance dynamics of gadolinium chelate: a potential diagnostic pitfall. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2007;28:1964-7. [PMID: 17893215 DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A0694] [Cited by in Crossref: 29] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 12] [Article Influence: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis]
12 Verma RK, Wiest R, Locher C, Heldner MR, Schucht P, Raabe A, Gralla J, Kamm CP, Slotboom J, Kellner‐weldon F. Differentiating enhancing multiple sclerosis lesions, glioblastoma, and lymphoma with dynamic texture parameters analysis ( DTPA ): A feasibility study. Med Phys 2017;44:4000-8. [DOI: 10.1002/mp.12356] [Cited by in Crossref: 7] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 5] [Article Influence: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis]
13 Dickinson PJ, Jones-Woods S, Cissell DD. Abrogation of fluid suppression in intracranial postcontrast fluid-attenuated inversion recovery magnetic resonance imaging: A clinical and phantom study. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 2018;59:432-43. [PMID: 29424062 DOI: 10.1111/vru.12605] [Cited by in Crossref: 3] [Article Influence: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis]