Citation of this article
Corresponding Author of This Article
Article-Type of This Article
Open-Access Policy of This Article
Times Cited Counts in Google of This Article
Number of Hits and Downloads for This Article
- Total Article Views (4760)
All Articles published online
|
Aug 6, 2011 (publication date) through Apr 15, 2024
Times Cited of This Article
Journal Information of This Article
Publication Name
World Journal of Gastrointestinal Pharmacology and Therapeutics
ISSN
2150-5349
Publisher of This Article
Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA
| For: | Zeitoun A, Zeineddine M, Dimassi H. Stress ulcer prophylaxis guidelines: Are they being implemented in Lebanese health care centers? World J Gastrointest Pharmacol Ther 2011; 2(4): 27-35 [PMID: 21860840 DOI: 10.4292/wjgpt.v2.i4.27] |
|---|---|
| URL: | https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v2/i4/27.htm |
| Number | Citing Articles |
| 1 |
Mary E. Anderson. Stress Ulcer Prophylaxis in Hospitalized Patients. Hospital Medicine Clinics 2013; 2(1): e32 doi: 10.1016/j.ehmc.2012.07.004
|
| 2 |
Boressa Adugna Horsa, Yohanes Ayele, Mohammed Biset Ayalew. Assessment of pharmacologic prophylaxis use against stress ulcer in the medical wards of University of Gondar Hospital. SAGE Open Medicine 2019; 7: 205031211982740 doi: 10.1177/2050312119827409
|
| 3 |
M.S. Mohamad, N. Shamsuddin, K.M. Tan. Appropriateness of stress ulcer prophylaxis among older adults admitted to general medical wards in a university hospital. European Geriatric Medicine 2015; 6(2): 119 doi: 10.1016/j.eurger.2014.11.004
|
| 4 |
Yeo Jin Choi, Joohyun Sim, Yun Tae Jung, Sooyoung Shin. Impact of a multidisciplinary quality improvement initiative to reduce inappropriate usage of stress ulcer prophylaxis in hospitalized patients. British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology 2020; 86(5): 903 doi: 10.1111/bcp.14197
|
| 5 |
Shaden S Alhujilan, Mustafa S Saeed, Abdullah Abdulaziz Alalwan. Assessment of adherence to the national stress ulcer prophylaxis guidelines: A cross-sectional analysis. Saudi Pharmaceutical Journal 2023; 31(10): 101754 doi: 10.1016/j.jsps.2023.101754
|
| 6 |
Bahia Chahine. Potentially inappropriate medications prescribing to elderly patients with advanced chronic kidney by using 2019 American Geriatrics Society Beers Criteria. Health Science Reports 2020; 3(4) doi: 10.1002/hsr2.214
|
| 7 |
Shadi Farsaei, Sajad Ghorbani, Payman Adibi. Variables Associated with Adherence to Stress Ulcer Prophylaxis in Patients Admitted to the General Hospital Wards: A Prospective Study. Advanced Pharmaceutical Bulletin 2017; 7(1): 73 doi: 10.15171/apb.2017.009
|
| 8 |
Zhi-Kang Ye, Ying Liu, Xiang-Li Cui, Li-Hong Liu, John Green. Critical Appraisal of the Quality of Clinical Practice Guidelines for Stress Ulcer Prophylaxis. PLOS ONE 2016; 11(5): e0155020 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0155020
|
| 9 |
Onuma Sattayalertyanyong, Premrutai Thitilertdecha, Chonticha Auesomwang. The inappropriate use of proton pump inhibitors during admission and after discharge: a prospective cross-sectional study. International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy 2020; 42(1): 174 doi: 10.1007/s11096-019-00955-8
|
| 10 |
Hongli Luo, Qingze Fan, Shunlin Xiao, Kun Chen, John Green. Impact of clinical pharmacist interventions on inappropriate prophylactic acid suppressant use in hepatobiliary surgical patients undergoing elective operations. PLOS ONE 2017; 12(10): e0186302 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0186302
|
| 11 |
Analysis of the use and cost of stress ulcer prophylaxis for surgical inpatients. Journal of Basic and Clinical Physiology and Pharmacology 2019; 30(6) doi: 10.1515/jbcpp-2019-0306
|