Academic Content and Language Evaluation of This Article
CrossCheck and Google Search of This Article
Academic Rules and Norms of This Article
Citation of this article
Corresponding Author of This Article
Research Domain of This Article
Article-Type of This Article
Open-Access Policy of This Article
Times Cited Counts in Google of This Article
Number of Hits and Downloads for This Article
- Total Article Views (5467)
All Articles published online
|
Publishing Process of This Article
|
May 16, 2015 (publication date) through Apr 25, 2024
Times Cited of This Article
Journal Information of This Article
Publication Name
World Journal of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
ISSN
1948-5190
Publisher of This Article
Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA
| For: | He GL, Jiang ZS, Cheng Y, Lai QB, Zhou CJ, Liu HY, Gao Y, Pan MX, Jian ZX. Tripartite comparison of single-incision and conventional laparoscopy in cholecystectomy: A multicenter trial. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2015; 7(5): 540-546 [PMID: 25992193 DOI: 10.4253/wjge.v7.i5.540] |
|---|---|
| URL: | https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v7/i5/540.htm |
| Number | Citing Articles |
| 1 |
Kodai Takahashi, Eiji Kanehira, Aya Kamei, Takashi Tanida, Kazunori Sasaki. Stabilization of Single-incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy by Needle Puncture and Bendable Retractor. Surgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy & Percutaneous Techniques 2018; 28(6): 375 doi: 10.1097/SLE.0000000000000539
|
| 2 |
C. Hoyuela, M. Juvany, S. Guillaumes, J. Ardid, M. Trias, I. Bachero, A. Martrat. Long-term incisional hernia rate after single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy is significantly higher than that after standard three-port laparoscopy: a cohort study. Hernia 2019; 23(6): 1205 doi: 10.1007/s10029-019-01969-x
|
| 3 |
Yunxiao Lyu, Yunxiao Cheng, Bin Wang, Sicong Zhao, Liang Chen. Single-incision versus conventional multiport laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a current meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Surgical Endoscopy 2020; 34(10): 4315 doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-07198-8
|
| 4 |
A. Arezzo, R. Passera, E. Forcignanò, L. Rapetti, R. Cirocchi, M. Morino. Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy is responsible for increased adverse events: results of a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Surgical Endoscopy 2018; 32(9): 3739 doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6143-y
|
| 5 |
Murillo de Lima FAVARO, Silvio GABOR, Ruy Francisco Pimentel PEDROSO, Ligia RIBEIRO, Otto Mauro ROSA, Marcelo Augusto Fontenelle RIBEIRO-JUNIOR. SINGLE PORT LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY: TECHNICAL ASPECTS AND RESULTS. ABCD. Arquivos Brasileiros de Cirurgia Digestiva (São Paulo) 2018; 31(3) doi: 10.1590/0102-672020180001e1388
|
| 6 |
Reno Rudiman, Ricarhdo Valentino Hanafi, Almawijaya .. Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus conventional multi-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression of randomized controlled trials. F1000Research 2022; 11: 754 doi: 10.12688/f1000research.122102.1
|
| 7 |
Joseph J. Zhao, Nicholas L. Syn, Cheryl Chong, Hwee Leong Tan, Julia Yu Xin Ng, Ashton Yap, Tousif Kabir, Brian K.P. Goh. Comparative outcomes of needlescopic, single-incision laparoscopic, standard laparoscopic, mini-laparotomy, and open cholecystectomy: A systematic review and network meta-analysis of 96 randomized controlled trials with 11,083 patients. Surgery 2021; 170(4): 994 doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2021.04.004
|
| 8 |
Geon Young Byun, Sung Ryul Lee, Bum Hwan Koo. Safety of single‐incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis. ANZ Journal of Surgery 2018; 88(7-8): 755 doi: 10.1111/ans.14246
|
| 9 |
Krislynn M. Mueck, Deepa V. Cherla, Amy Taylor, Tien C. Ko, Mike K. Liang, Lillian S. Kao. Randomized Controlled Trials Evaluating Patient-Reported Outcomes after Cholecystectomy: A Systematic Review. Journal of the American College of Surgeons 2018; 226(2): 183 doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2017.10.023
|
| 10 |
Gaity Ahmad, Jade Baker, John Finnerty, Kevin Phillips, Andrew Watson. Laparoscopic entry techniques. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2019; 2019(1) doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006583.pub5
|