Systematic Reviews
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2017. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.
World J Diabetes. Jan 15, 2017; 8(1): 28-39
Published online Jan 15, 2017. doi: 10.4239/wjd.v8.i1.28
Barriers that practitioners face when initiating insulin therapy in general practice settings and how they can be overcome
Abdulaziz Bin rsheed, Ian Chenoweth
Abdulaziz Bin rsheed, Department of Family and Community Medicine, Prince Sultan Military Medical City, Riyadh 11159, Saudi Arabia
Abdulaziz Bin rsheed, Ian Chenoweth, Department of General Practice, School of Primary Health Care, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Victoria 3800, Australia
Author contributions: Both Bin rsheed A and Chenoweth I have made substantial contributions in regard to: Conception, literature review, research design, and data collection, interpretation of data, writing and reviewing; both authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Conflict-of-interest statement: The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.
Data sharing statement: No additional data are available.
Open-Access: This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Correspondence to: Abdulaziz Bin rsheed, MBBS, SBFM, ABFM, Consultant Family Physician, Department of Family and Community Medicine, Prince Sultan Military Medical City, PO Box 7897, Riyadh 11159, Saudi Arabia. abdulaziz_binrsheed@yahoo.com
Telephone: +966-555-219229
Received: June 2, 2016
Peer-review started: June 6, 2016
First decision: July 5, 2016
Revised: July 29, 2016
Accepted: October 17, 2016
Article in press: October 18, 2016
Published online: January 15, 2017
Abstract
AIM

To explore primary care physicians’ perspectives on possible barriers to the use of insulin.

METHODS

This systematic review was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Eight electronic databases were searched (between January 1, 1994 and August 31, 2014) for relevant studies. A search for grey literature and a review of the references in the retrieved studies were also conducted. Studies that focused on healthcare providers’ perspectives on possible barriers to insulin initiation with type 2 diabetic patients were included, as well as articles suggesting solutions for these barriers. Review articles and studies that only considered patients’ perspectives were excluded.

RESULTS

A total of 19 studies met the inclusion criteria and were therefore included in this study: 10 of these studies used qualitative methods, 8 used quantitative methods and 1 used mixed methods. Studies included a range of different health care settings. The findings are reported under four broad categories: The perceptions of primary care physicians about the barriers to initiate insulin therapy for type 2 diabetes patients, how primary care physicians assess patients prior to initiating insulin, professional roles and possible solutions to overcome these barriers. The barriers described were many and covered doctor, patient, system and technological aspects. Interventions that focused on doctor training and support, or IT-based decision support were few, and did not result in significant improvement.

CONCLUSION

Primary care physicians’ known delay in insulin initiation is multifactorial. Published reports of attempts to find solutions for these barriers were limited in number.

Keywords: Diabetes, Insulin, Initiation, Delay, Barriers, Primary care physicians

Core tip: There are several barriers to primary care physicians in initiating insulin therapy when it is required for type 2 diabetes patients. The main purpose of this systematic review is to explore these barriers in depth. Published reports of attempts to find solutions to these barriers were limited in number. Given the increasing burden of this chronic disease, and the need to optimize and standardize management, it is expected research in this area will remain intense. The research that remains patient-centered and takes a system approach can be expected to yield best results.