World J Gastroenterol. 2009 April 14; 15(14): 1774-1778.
Published online 2009 April 14. doi: 10.3748/wjg.15.1774.
A case of small bowel adenocarcinoma in a patient with Crohn’s disease detected by PET/CT and double-balloon enteroscopy
Chise Kodaira, Satoshi Osawa, Chihiro Mochizuki, Yoshihiko Sato, Masafumi Nishino, Takanori Yamada, Yasuhiro Takayanagi, Kosuke Takagaki, Ken Sugimoto, Shigeru Kanaoka, Takahisa Furuta and Mutsuhiro Ikuma.
Chise Kodaira, Satoshi Osawa, Masafumi Nishino, Takanori Yamada, Yasuhiro Takayanagi, Kosuke Takagaki, Ken Sugimoto, Mutsuhiro Ikuma, First Department of Medicine, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, 1-20-1 Handayama, Higashi-ku, Hamamatsu 431-3192, Japan
Chihiro Mochizuki, Yoshihiko Sato, Department of Gastroenterology, Seirei Hamamatsu General Hospital, 2-12-12 Sumiyoshi, Naka-ku, Hamamatsu 431-3192, Japan
Shigeru Kanaoka, Molecular Diagnosis, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, 1-20-1 Handayama, Higashi-ku, Hamamatsu 431-3192, Japan
Takahisa Furuta, Center for Clinical Research, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, 1-20-1 Handayama, Higashi-ku, Hamamatsu 431-3192, Japan
Author contributions: Kodaira C and Osawa S wrote the paper; Mochizuki C and Sato Y contributed to the PET/CT and imaging diagnosis; Nishino M, Yamada T, Takayanagi Y, and Takagaki K performed the double-balloon enteroscopy; Sugimoto K, Kanaoka S, Furuta T, and Ikuma M designed the paper.
Correspondence to: Satoshi Osawa, MD, PhD, First Department of Medicine, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, 1-20-1 Handayama, Higashi-ku, Hamamatsu 431-3192, Japan. sososawa@hama-med.ac.jp
Telephone: +81-53-4352261
Fax: +81-53-4349447
Received September 23, 2008; Revised March 12, 2009; Accepted March 19, 2009;
Abstract
Small bowel adenocarcinoma (SBA) in patients with Crohn’s disease (CD) is quite rare, difficult to diagnose without surgery, and has a poor prognosis. Here, we report a 48-year-old man with SBA and a 21-year history of CD who was diagnosed by a combination of positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) and double-balloon enteroscopy (DBE). Since the age of 27 years, the patient had been treated for ileal CD and was referred to our hospital with persistent melena. Multiple hepatic tumors were found by CT. PET/CT detected an accumulation spot in the small bowel. DBE revealed an ulcerative tumor in the ileum about 100 cm from the ileocecal valve. An endoscopic forceps biopsy specimen showed poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma. There were some longitudinal ulcer scars near the tumor, and the chronic inflammation in the small bowel appeared to be associated with the cancer development. Previous reports suggest the risk of SBA in patients with CD is higher than in the overall population. Since early diagnosis is extremely difficult in these cases, novel techniques, such as PET/CT and DBE, may be expected to help in making a preoperative diagnosis of the development of SBA in CD.
Keywords: Crohn’s disease, Double-balloon enteroscopy, Positron emission tomography, Small bowel adeno-carcinoma, Surveillance
INTRODUCTION
Previous studies have documented that patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) are at increased risk of developing colorectal and intestinal cancer[16]. However, because of its rarity, there is limited data on the precise cancer risk of small bowel adenocarcinoma (SBA) in patients with Crohn’s disease (CD). To date, recommendations for screening and surveillance have been supported by very limited data[7]. Even in extensive colitis, a recent report found that colonoscopy surveillance may not improve survival[8], and other tools are needed to detect cancer development in the early stages. Here, we report a patient with a 21-year history of CD who developed a SBA that was detected by 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) and double-balloon enteroscopy (DBE) without conventional intestinal examinations.
CASE REPORT
A 48-year-old man who was diagnosed with ileal CD as a 27-year-old was referred to our hospital with persistent melena. His family history was negative for this disease. He had no evidence of gluten intolerance. He had been treated with 5-aminosalicylates (5-ASAs) combined with an elemental-diet (ED) therapy and had several hospitalizations for temporary melena in the past two decades. He had not agreed to have an intestinal examination at regular intervals. In January 2007, he was examined by abdominal CT due to persistent melena for 1 year, and multiple metastatic tumors were discovered in the liver (Figure 1A). Blood tests showed a slight anemia (Hb 11.8 g/dL), but he was negative for inflammatory factors. The serum carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) was elevated (31.6 ng/mL; normal range, < 2.5 ng/mL), and wall thickening in part of the ileum was detected by CT (Figure 1B). PET/CT showed accumulations in the multiple hepatic tumors and the wall thickening of the ileum (Figure 2). DBE showed an ulcerative tumor in the ileum about 100 cm away from the ileocecal valve (Figure 3A). There were some longitudinal ulcer scars near the tumor (Figure 3B). An endoscopic forceps biopsy specimen showed microscopically poorly-differentiated adenocarcinoma (Figure 4A and B). Immunohistochemistry of the tumor cells was negative for p58 and positive for ?-catenin (Figure 4C and D). Accordingly, he was diagnosed with SBA with hepatic metastases. Although he was treated by chemotherapy with S-1 and cisplatin (CDDP), there was no effective response. He died 4 mo after the diagnosis because of liver failure due to progression of the hepatic metastases.
Figure 1
Figure 1
Figure 1
CT findings. A: Abdominal CT showed the multiple hepatic tumors with ring enhancement; B: Wall thickening of a part of the small bowel (arrow).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Figure 2
PET/CT findings. A: Wall thickening of a part of ileum (arrow). B: PET/CT showed 18F-FDG accumulation in the site of wall thickening of ileum (arrow).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Figure 3
DBE findings. A: DBE showed ulcerative mass located in the ileum at about 100 cm away from ileocecal valve; B: Some longitudinal ulcer scars near the tumor.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Figure 4
Histopathological findings of the biopsy specimen showed poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma. A: HE (× 100), B: HE (× 400), C: Immunohistochemical staining using ?-catenin antibody (× 100), D: Immunohistochemical staining using p53 antibody (× 100).
DISCUSSION
Primary SBA is rare and the incidence is reported to be 1 to 5% of all gastrointestinal tract malignancies[910], and the most important known risk factor for this malignant tumor is previous CD[511]. SBA in CD was reported for the first time by Ginzburg in 1956[12]. The risk for SBA is reportedly higher in patients with CD than in the overall population. Recent meta-analysis revealed the relative risk of SBA in patients with CD as 28.4 (95% CI, 14.5-55.7)[13] to 33.2 (95% CI, 15.9-60.9)[14]. In clinical settings, SBA in CD is difficult to diagnose, and most previous cases were diagnosed after surgery without suspicion of malignancy. Therefore, novel tools are needed to detect and survey the development of this cancer. In our case, we were able to diagnose SBA non-surgically by a novel approach using PET/CT and DBE.
Based on previous reports, Dossett et al[3] summarized the 154 cases of SBA in CD reported in Europe and America. SBA in CD occurred more frequently in males than females (M:F ratio of 2.4:1). The age at diagnosis ranged from 21 to 86 years (mean age, 51.3), and the average duration of CD was 24.5 years (0-45 years)[3]. SBA in CD was observed at a younger age[1] as compared with de novo cancers that were found in 60-69-year-olds[15]. Tumors were found in the ileum at a rate of 75%. The presence of previously bypassed segments of the intestine was 20.3%. Obstruction was the most common manifestation (76%), whereas hemorrhage, fistula, and perforation were observed in 3.9%, 3.9%, and 5.4% of cases, respectively. The majority of diagnoses were made at the time of operation (35.4%) or postoperatively (61.5%). Only 3.1% of the cases could be diagnosed preoperatively. Survival rates after 1 and 2 years were 49.6% and 27%, respectively[3].
In the present case, there were some longitudinal ulcer scars near the tumor, suggesting that chronic inflammation is associated with the development of SBA. Because it is well known that a combination of immunohistochemically strong p53 expression and absent or weak ?-catenin expression in ulcerative colitis (UC) patients is evidence for colitis-associated dysplastic lesions[16], we examined the immunohistochemical characteristics of the tumor[17]. In this case, there was no detectable p53 expression, but strong ?-catenin expression. Chemotherapy and radiation for SBA have produced disappointing results, and only a few studies have evaluated chemotherapy for unresectable SBA in CD[18]. There have been no controlled studies recommending an effective treatment regimen. Although we treated this patient by systemic chemotherapy with S-1 and CDDP in agreement with the patient, the therapy was not effective and did not seem to prolong the survival time.
There are several previous reports of long-standing risk factors for SBA, including onset of the disease before the age of 30 years, presence of a bypassed segment, chronic active course with stricture and fistulas, male gender, and smoking[135111921]. Corticosteroid and azathioprine therapy to treat CD are also considered potential risk factors. However, 5-ASAs prevent the development of intestinal adenocarcinoma in IBD[12225]. There is also a theoretical risk for an increased rate of malignancies due to antagonism of TNF-?, but to date, there is no clear proof of such an effect[2627].
Recommendations for screening and surveillance of SBA in CD have been supported by only very limited data[8]. The overall risk of colorectal cancer for UC patients is estimated to be 3.7% (95% CI, 3.2%-4.2%); 2% at 10 years, 8% at 20 years, and 18% at 30 years[28], whereas reported cancerin CD is 0.63%-3.1%[29]. Although diagnostic investigations using conventional modalities such as small bowel series, double-contrast enteroclysis, and upper and lower gastrointestinal endoscopies have been performed on patients with a high cancer risk, a recent report found that colonoscopy surveillance may not improve survival even in studying extensive colitis, thus other tools are needed to detect cancer development[8]. CT and MRI are now considered the common imaging modality of choice for abdominal malignancy. Endoscopy of the small intestine, especially capsule endoscopy and DBE, are promising new diagnostic tools[30]. Capsule endoscopy is not invasive, but has a risk of retention for patients with CD who have a stenosis in the intestinal tract[3132]. DBE is a new endoscopic method that provides complete visualization, the ability to biopsy the small bowel, and provides diagnostic and therapeutic information[33].
The recent development of innovative im In this case, PET/CT was effective for the discovery of a small bowel tumor at the initial examination. Although the localization of lesions may not be completely accurate, PET/CT provides accurately fused morphological and functional imaging within a single examination. Today, PET imaging has a high sensitivity for detecting colorectal cancer (CRC) and is superior to conventional CT staging when CRC patients are assessed for local and distant metastases[3435]. PET/CT also offers a better non-invasive tool for identifying and localizing active intestinal inflammation in patients with CD[36]. Although PET/CT is not able to replace conventional studies due to its high cost, it may be useful when conventional studies cannot be performed or are not completed in CD patients. In this case, the tumor was detected at an advanced stage with multiple liver metastases. Although it is still uncertain whether combining PET/CT and DBE will enable us to make an early diagnosis for SBA, this case certainly indicates the possibility of combining PET/CT and DBE without conventional modalities, such as a small bowel series, to detect a primary malignant tumor of the small bowel without surgery. One strategy to monitor high-risk patients might be to perform PET/CT at an initial examination, and then conduct a DBE examination for the patient who has abnormal regions suspected as being malignant.
The recent development of innovative imaging techniques involving PET/CT and DBE has opened a new area in the exploration of the small bowel in CD patients. Each of these techniques is characterized by its own profile of favorable and unfavorable features[30]. Future clinical studies are expected to demonstrate strategies to monitor SBA in CD patients.
Footnotes
Peer reviewer: Luis Rodrigo, Professor, Gastroenterology Service, Hospital Central de Asturias, c/Celestino Villamil, s.n., Oviedo 33.006, Spain
S- Editor Tian L L- Editor Logan S E- Editor Yin DH
References
1.
Solem CA, Harmsen WS, Zinsmeister AR, Loftus EV Jr. Small intestinal adenocarcinoma in Crohn’s disease: a case-control study. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2004;10:32-35.
2.
Jess T, Winther KV, Munkholm P, Langholz E, Binder V. Intestinal and extra-intestinal cancer in Crohn’s disease: follow-up of a population-based cohort in Copenhagen County, Denmark. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2004;19:287-293.
3.
Dossett LA, White LM, Welch DC, Herline AJ, Muldoon RL, Schwartz DA, Wise PE. Small bowel adenocarcinoma complicating Crohn’s disease: case series and review of the literature. Am Surg. 2007;73:1181-1187.
4.
Lewis JD, Deren JJ, Lichtenstein GR. Cancer risk in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Gastroenterol Clin North Am. 1999;28:459-477.
5.
Munkholm P, Langholz E, Davidsen M, Binder V. Intestinal cancer risk and mortality in patients with Crohn’s disease. Gastroenterology. 1993;105:1716-1723.
6.
Persson PG, Karlén P, Bernell O, Leijonmarck CE, Broström O, Ahlbom A, Hellers G. Crohn’s disease and cancer: a population-based cohort study. Gastroenterology. 1994;107:1675-1679.
7.
Xie J, Itzkowitz SH. Cancer in inflammatory bowel disease. World J Gastroenterol. 2008;14:378-389.
8.
Friedman S, Rubin PH, Bodian C, Goldstein E, Harpaz N, Present DH. Screening and surveillance colonoscopy in chronic Crohn’s colitis. Gastroenterology. 2001;120:820-826.
9.
Barclay TH, Schapira DV. Malignant tumors of the small intestine. Cancer. 1983;51:878-881.
10.
Mittal VK, Bodzin JH. Primary malignant tumors of the small bowel. Am J Surg. 1980;140:396-399.
11.
Lashner BA. Risk factors for small bowel cancer in Crohn’s disease. Dig Dis Sci. 1992;37:1179-1184.
12.
Ginzburg L, Schneider KM, Dreizin DH, Levinson C. Carcinoma of the jejunum occurring in a case of regional enteritis. Surgery. 1956;39:347-351.
13.
von Roon AC, Reese G, Teare J, Constantinides V, Darzi AW, Tekkis PP. The risk of cancer in patients with Crohn’s disease. Dis Colon Rectum. 2007;50:839-855.
14.
Canavan C, Abrams KR, Mayberry J. Meta-analysis: colorectal and small bowel cancer risk in patients with Crohn’s disease. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2006;23:1097-1104.
15.
Negri E, Bosetti C, La Vecchia C, Fioretti F, Conti E, Franceschi S. Risk factors for adenocarcinoma of the small intestine. Int J Cancer. 1999;82:171-174.
16.
Walsh SV, Loda M, Torres CM, Antonioli D, Odze RD. P53 and beta catenin expression in chronic ulcerative colitis--associated polypoid dysplasia and sporadic adenomas: an immunohistochemical study. Am J Surg Pathol. 1999;23:963-969.
17.
Odze RD. Adenomas and adenoma-like DALMs in chronic ulcerative colitis: a clinical, pathological, and molecular review. Am J Gastroenterol. 1999;94:1746-1750.
18.
Bruckner HW, Hrehorovich VR, Sawhney HS, Meeus SI, Coopeman AM. Chemotherapeutic management of small bowel adenocarcinoma associated with Crohn’s disease. J Chemother. 2006;18:545-548.
19.
Partridge SK, Hodin RA. Small bowel adenocarcinoma at a strictureplasty site in a patient with Crohn’s disease: report of a case. Dis Colon Rectum. 2004;47:778-781.
20.
Christodoulou D, Skopelitou AS, Katsanos KH, Katsios C, Agnantis N, Price A, Kappas A, Tsianos EV. Small bowel adenocarcinoma presenting as a first manifestation of Crohn’s disease: report of a case, and a literature review. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2002;14:805-810.
21.
Kaerlev L, Teglbjaerg PS, Sabroe S, Kolstad HA, Ahrens W, Eriksson M, Guénel P, Hardell L, Launoy G, Merler E. Medical risk factors for small-bowel adenocarcinoma with focus on Crohn disease: a European population-based case-control study. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2001;36:641-646.
22.
Bernstein CN, Blanchard JF, Kliewer E, Wajda A. Cancer risk in patients with inflammatory bowel disease: a population-based study. Cancer. 2001;91:854-862.
23.
Moody GA, Jayanthi V, Probert CS, Mac Kay H, Mayberry JF. Long-term therapy with sulphasalazine protects against colorectal cancer in ulcerative colitis: a retrospective study of colorectal cancer risk and compliance with treatment in Leicestershire. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 1996;8:1179-1183.
24.
Ryan BM, Russel MG, Langholz E, Stockbrugger RW. Aminosalicylates and colorectal cancer in IBD: a not-so bitter pill to swallow. Am J Gastroenterol. 2003;98:1682-1687.
25.
Piton G, Cosnes J, Monnet E, Beaugerie L, Seksik P, Savoye G, Cadiot G, Flourie B, Capelle P, Marteau P. Risk factors associated with small bowel adenocarcinoma in Crohn’s disease: a case-control study. Am J Gastroenterol. 2008;103:1730-1736.
26.
Wenzl HH, Reinisch W, Jahnel J, Stockenhuber F, Tilg H, Kirchgatterer A, Petritsch W. Austrian infliximab experience in Crohn’s disease: a nationwide cooperative study with long-term follow-up. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2004;16:767-773.
27.
Kronberger IE, Graziadei IW, Vogel W. Small bowel adenocarcinoma in Crohn’s disease: a case report and review of literature. World J Gastroenterol. 2006;12:1317-1320.
28.
Eaden JA, Abrams KR, Mayberry JF. The risk of colorectal cancer in ulcerative colitis: a meta-analysis. Gut. 2001;48:526-535.
29.
Korelitz BI. Carcinoma of the intestinal tract in Crohn’s disease: results of a survey conducted by the National Foundation for Ileitis and colitis. Am J Gastroenterol. 1983;78:44-46.
30.
Saibeni S, Rondonotti E, Iozzelli A, Spina L, Tontini GE, Cavallaro F, Ciscato C, de Franchis R, Sardanelli F, Vecchi M. Imaging of the small bowel in Crohn’s disease: a review of old and new techniques. World J Gastroenterol. 2007;13:3279-3287.
31.
Cheifetz AS, Kornbluth AA, Legnani P, Schmelkin I, Brown A, Lichtiger S, Lewis BS. The risk of retention of the capsule endoscope in patients with known or suspected Crohn’s disease. Am J Gastroenterol. 2006;101:2218-2222.
32.
Rondonotti E, Villa F, Mulder CJ, Jacobs MA, de Franchis R. Small bowel capsule endoscopy in 2007: indications, risks and limitations. World J Gastroenterol. 2007;13:6140-6149.
33.
Oshitani N, Yukawa T, Yamagami H, Inagawa M, Kamata N, Watanabe K, Jinno Y, Fujiwara Y, Higuchi K, Arakawa T. Evaluation of deep small bowel involvement by double-balloon enteroscopy in Crohn’s disease. Am J Gastroenterol. 2006;101:1484-1489.
34.
Veit-Haibach P, Kuehle CA, Beyer T, Stergar H, Kuehl H, Schmidt J, Börsch G, Dahmen G, Barkhausen J, Bockisch A. Diagnostic accuracy of colorectal cancer staging with whole-body PET/CT colonography. JAMA. 2006;296:2590-2600.
35.
Antoch G, Vogt FM, Freudenberg LS, Nazaradeh F, Goehde SC, Barkhausen J, Dahmen G, Bockisch A, Debatin JF, Ruehm SG. Whole-body dual-modality PET/CT and whole-body MRI for tumor staging in oncology. JAMA. 2003;290:3199-3206.
36.
Louis E, Ancion G, Colard A, Spote V, Belaiche J, Hustinx R. Noninvasive assessment of Crohn’s disease intestinal lesions with (18)F-FDG PET/CT. J Nucl Med. 2007;48:1053-1059.