Search Article Keyword  
PubMed Submission Abstarct PDF Cited  Click Count: 930 DownLoad Count: 478 

ISSN 1007-9327 CN 14-1219/R  World J Gastroenterol  2005 September 14;11(34):5283-5288

Long-term hepatic consequences of chemotherapy-related HBV reactivation in lymphoma patients

Wen-Pin Su, Chi-Chung Wen, Chao A. Hsiung, Ih-Jen Su, Ann-Lii Cheng, Ming-Chih Chang, Chao-Jung Tsao, Woei-Yao Kao, Wu-Ching Uen, Chiun Hsu, Chih-Hung Hsu, Yen-Shen Lu, Hwei-Fan Tien, Tsu-Yi Chao, Li-Tzong Chen, Jacqueline Whang-Peng, Pei-Jer Chen


Wen-Pin Su, Ann-Lii Cheng, Chiun Hsu, Chih-Hung Hsu, Yen-Shen Lu, Department of Oncology, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan, China
Chi-Chung Wen, Chao A. Hsiung, Division of Biostatics and Bioinformatics, National Health Research Institutes, Taipei, Taiwan, China
Ih-Jen Su, Division of Clinical Research, National Health Research Institutes, Taipei, Taiwan, China
Ann-Lii Cheng, Hwei-Fan Tien, Pei-Jer Chen, Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan, China
Ming-Chih Chang, Department of Internal Medicine, Mackay Memorial Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan, China
Chao-Jung Tsao, Department of Internal Medicine, Chi-Mei Hospital, Tainan, Taiwan, China
Woei-Yao Kao, Tsu-Yi Chao, Department of Internal Medicine, Tri-Service General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan, China
Wu-Ching Uen, Department of Internal Medicine, Shin Kong Memorial Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan, China
5283-5288 Jacqueline Whang-Peng, Division of Cancer Research, National Health Research Institutes, Taipei, Taiwan, China
Pei-Jer Chen, Clinical Research Institute, National Taiwan University College of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan, China
Supported by the National Health Research Institute, Taiwan, China
Co-correspondent: Pei-Jer Chen
Correspondence to: Ann-Lii Cheng, MD, PhD, Professor, Departments of Oncology and Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, No. 7, Chung-Shan South Road, Taipei 10016, Taiwan, China.  andrew@ha.mc.ntu.edu.tw
Telephone: +886-2-2312-3456-7251    Fax: +886-2-2371-1174
Received: 2005-02-22    Accepted: 2005-03-23

Abstract
AIM: To investigate the long-term consequences of chemotherapy-related HBV reactivation in patients with lymphoma.

METHODS: This study was based on the database of published prospective study evaluating HBV reactivation in HBV lymphoma patients during chemotherapy. Deteriorated liver reserve (DLR) was defined as development of either one of the following conditions during follow-up: (1) newly onset parenchyma liver disease, splenomegaly or ascites without evidence of lymphoma involvement; (2) decrease of the ratio (albumin/globulin ratio) to less than 0.8 or increase of the ratio of INR of prothrombin time to larger than 1.2 without evidence of malnutrition or infection. Liver cirrhosis was diagnosed by imaging studies.

RESULTS: A total of 49 patients were included. The median follow-up was 6.2 years (range, 3.9-8.1 years). There were 31 patients with and 18 patients without HBV reactivation. Although there was no difference of overall survival (OS) and chemotherapy response rate between the two groups, DLR developed more frequently in patients with HBV reactivation (48.4% vs 16.7%; P = 0.0342). Among the HBV reactivators, HBV genotype C was associated with a higher risk of developing DLR (P = 0.0768) and liver cirrhosis (P = 0.003). Four of five patients with sustained high titer of HBV DNA and two of three patients with multiple HBV reactivation developed DLR. Further, patients with a sustained high titer of HBV DNA had the shortest OS among the HBV reactivators (P = 0.0000). No patients in the non-HBV reactivation group developed hepatic failure or liver cirrhosis.

CONCLUSION: Chemotherapy-related HBV reactivation is associated with the long-term effect of deterioration of hepatic function.

© 2005 The WJG Press and Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Key words: HBV reactivation; Liver function; Non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma; Chemotherapy

Su WP, Wen CC, Hsiung CA, Su IJ, Cheng AL, Chang MC, Tsao CJ, Kao WY, Uen WC, Hsu C, Hsu CH, Lu YS, Tien HF, Chao TY, Chen LT, Wang-Peng J, Chen PJ. Long-term hepatic consequences of chemotherapy-related HBV reactivation in lymphoma patients. World J Gastroenterol  2005; 11(34): 5283-5288
http://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/11/5283.asp

INTRODUCTION
Reactivation of HBV is a well-recognized complication in patients with chronic HBV infection, who receive cytotoxic chemotherapy or immunotherapy management for cancers[1-16]. This complication is especially important in Taiwan, Hong Kong, Singapore and Mainland China, which have high HBV carrier rates of approximately 15-20% in the general population. Although the reported frequency of HBV reactivation in hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg)-positive non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma (NHL) patients undergoing cancer chemotherapy has ranged widely from 14% to 72%[8-10], our recent prospective study indicated a HBV reactivation rate of around 70% in patients receiving conventional glucocorticoids-containing systemic chemotherapy[17]. In the near-term, hepatitis flare-up in patients undergoing chemotherapy may jeopardize scheduled chemotherapy or cause severe hepatic damage and even lethal hepatic failure of the patients. However, for survivors of lymphoma who have HBV reactivation during chemotherapy, the long-term hepatic consequences have not been elucidated.
In this study, we analyzed the long-term hepatic consequence in HBV lymphoma patients with HBV reactivation during chemotherapy by using the database of the TCOG (Taiwan Cooperative Oncology Group)-1495, initiated in 1995 and a prospective multi-center randomized clinical study, to evaluate HBV reactivation in HBsAg (+)-lymphoma patients[17]. Most of the patients in this study were followed up for more than 6 years. Our results indicated that though there is no difference in overall survival (OS) in the patients with or without HBV reactivation, HBV reactivation during systemic chemotherapy may have long-term adverse effect on the livers of the lymphoma survivors.

MATERIALS AND METHODS
Patients
This retrospective study used data collected during the long-term follow-up of patients enrolled in a multi-center randomized clinical study conducted from November 1995 to February 2000, which compared steroid-containing and steroid-free chemotherapy in HBsAg (+)-lymphoma patients (T-1495)[17]. All 49 patients who participated in that prospective trial were included in this study. HBV DNA, hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) status, HBV genotype and biochemical data (albumin, globulin, bilirubin in total and direct forms, serum aspartate aminotransaminase, serum alanine aminotransaminase (ALT), and prothrombin time (PT)) were regularly examined before treatment and every 2 wk during chemotherapy. All these exams except HBV studies were regularly checked every 2 mo during follow-up. Imaging studies (i.e., abdominal ultrasonography and computed tomography) were performed every 3 mo during chemotherapy and annually during the long-term follow-up.

Hepatitis B virus serology and definition of HBV reactivation
Briefly, HBV DNA was tested in duplicate using the Chiron bDNA assay (VERSANT HBV DNA assay, Chiron Diagnostics, Emeryville, CA, USA). This assay has a sensitivity of 2.5 pg/mL. HBV genotypes were determined using PCR-restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) of the surface gene of HBV[18]. Six genotypes (A-F) of HBV could be identified by the restriction patterns of DNA fragments.
    Clinical hepatitis flare-up was defined as a threefold or greater increase in serum ALT level that exceeded 100 IU/L. The hepatitis or hepatitis flare-up was attributed to reactivation of chronic hepatitis B, when there was a five-fold or higher elevation of serum HBV DNA compared with the pre-chemotherapy baseline level or re-appearance of HBV DNA or HBeAg in the serum. Liver biopsy was electively performed to determine the etiology of hepatitis in this study. Only six patients received liver biopsy before or after chemotherapy. Three patients who developed HBV reactivation after early 1999 were treated with lamivudine.

Definition of subtype HBV reactivation during chemotherapy
The HBV reactivation pattern was categorized into three groups as transient, protracted and multiple reactivations[17]. Transient pattern was characterized by a rapid and transient surge of HBV DNA, which usually resolved in a few weeks. Protracted HBV reactivation was defined as a prolonged period of persistently high HBV DNA titer. Some patients with protracted HBV reactivation finally achieved resolution after several bouts of clinical hepatitis (protracted/resolved), while others maintained a high-titer of HBV DNA status throughout the entire period of chemotherapy (protracted/unresolved). Multiple HBV reactivations were characterized by repeated HBV increment after apparent resolution of previous episodes.

Definition of deteriorated liver reserve
In this retrospective study, hepatic images, albumin/globulin ratio (A/G ratio)[19-22] and international normalized ratio (INR) of PT[23-25] were used for the evaluation of liver status. Deteriorated liver reserve (DLR) was defined as the development of either one of the following conditions during the following period: (1) New onset of parenchyma liver disease, liver cirrhosis, splenomegaly or ascites[26] without evidence of lymphoma involvement of the liver; (2) Decrease of the ratio (A/G ratio) to less than 0.8 [(post-chemotherapy A/G ratio)/(pre-chemotherapy A/G ratio)] or increase of the ratio of INR of PT [(post-chemotherapy INR)/(pre-chemotherapy INR)] to larger than 1.2 without evidence of malnutrition or infection status.

Statistical analysis
All analyses were carried out according to the intent-to-treat principle. Survival curves were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Chi-square test was used to compare variables between patients with and without HBV reactivation. A two-tailed P value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. SPSS statistical software (version 10.0) was used for the analysis in this study.

RESULTS
Baseline characteristics
The baseline characteristics of the NHL patients according to the occurrence HBV reactivation are shown in Table 1. The median follow-up of the patients was 6.2 years (range, 3.9-8.1 years). There were 31 patients (63.3%) in the HBV reactivation group and 18 patients (36.7%) in the non-HBV reactivation group. Among 31 patients with clinical HBV reactivation, only one patient had his liver biopsied to confirm the diagnosis. Patients who were more than 45 years old or those who had a lower pre-chemotherapy HBV DNA load (<100 copy numbers) had a significant tendency to develop HBV reactivation (P = 0.019 and P = 0.010, respectively). The likelihood of developing HBV reactivation was slightly higher in HBeAg (-) patients (P = 0.0841). Gender and HBV genotype did not contribute to HBV reactivation.

Long-term effect of HBV reactivation
None of the patients developed varices bleeding or hepatocellular carcinoma during the follow-up period. The median survival was 1 886 d in the HBV reactivation group (1 537±188 d, 95%CI as 1 168-1 907 d) and 828 d in the non-HBV reactivation group (1 255±217 d, 95%CI as 829-1 680 d) group. Although there was no difference in treatment response to chemotherapy (P = 0.3897) and OS between patients with and without HBV reactivation (P = 0.601, Figure 1A), DLR was developed more frequently in patients with HBV reactivation (48.4% vs 16.7%, P = 0.0342, Figure 1B).

Table 1  Characteristics of the HBV carriers receiving chemotherapy for non-Hodgkin's lymphoma
  HBV reactivation (-)  HBV reactivation (+)
  Total  n  %  n  %  P
Number of patients  49  18  36.7  31  63.3  
Median follow-up (yr)  6.2  5.4    6.7    
Age (yr)             
45  24  13  54.2  11  45.8  0.019 
>45  25  5  20  20  80  
Sex             
Female  21  7  33.3  14  66.7  0.7689 
Male  28  11  39.3  17  60.1  
HBeAg             
Positive  5  71.4  2  28.6  0.0841 
Negative  42  13  31  29  69  
Pre-chemotherapy HBV DNA             
100 copy numbers  11  8  72.7  3  27.3  0.010 
<100 copy numbers  38  10 26.3  28  73.7  
HBV genotype C             
Yes  12  5  41.7  7  58.3  0.7318 
No  32  11  34.4  21  65.6   
Unknown or mixed type  2  40  3  60  
Tumor overall response (complete remission and partial remission)             
Yes  26  8  30.8  18  69.2  0.3897 
No  23  10  43.5  13  56.5  

Figure 1  (PDF) OS of total 49 HBV carriers’ undergoing chemotherapy for non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma, according to HBV reactivation status (P = 0.601) (A); comparison of liver reserve between HBV reactivators and HBV non-reactivators (P = 0.0342) (B).

Risk factors for developing deteriorated liver reserve

Among the HBV reactivators, those with HBV genotype C had a higher risk of developing DLR (P = 0.0768). No other factor including HBeAg status, age, gender, reactivation pattern and peak value of bilirubin, ALT and HBV DNA level was found to be associated with poor liver outcome (Table 2). Three of thirty-one patients who had viral genotype C had new onset of liver cirrhosis by imaging criteria with Child-Pugh classification A. Genotype C was associated with the development of liver cirrhosis after chemotherapy among lymphoma patients who had HBV reactivation during chemotherapy (P = 0.003, Figure 2).
The characteristics and outcome of patients who developed DLR with patterns of protracted/unresolved (A) and multiple reactivations (B) are listed in Table 3. Four of five patients with pattern A and two of three patients with pattern B developed DLR. All 3 of the 31 patients who died of hepatic failure had protracted/unresolved (A) or multiple reactivation (B) patterns. No cases of hepatic failure or new onset of liver cirrhosis developed in the non-HBV reactivation group.

Table 2
  Risk factors for development of DLR among non-Hodgkin's lymphoma patients with HBV reactivation during chemotherapy
  DLR ()  DLR (+)  
  Total  %  n  P
Number of patients  31  16  51.6  15  48.4   
Age (yr)            
45  11  4  36.4  7  65.6  0.2734 
>45  20  12  60  8  40   
Sex            
Female  14  7  50  7  50 
Male  17  9  52.9  8  47.1   
GPT>10X            
Yes  19  8  42.1  11  57.9  0.2734 
No  12  8  66.7  4  33.4   
HBeAg            
Present  29  16  55.2  13  44.8  0.2258 
Absent  2  100   
HBV genotype C            
No  21  13  61.9  8  38.1  0.0768 
Yes  1  14.3  6  85.7  
Unknown or mixed type  2  66.7  1  33.3   
Total bilirubin >5            
Yes  1  20  4  80  0.1719 
No  26  15  57.7  11  42.3   
Peak HBV DNA >100X            
Yes  18  9  50  9  50 
No  13  7  53.8  6  46.2   
Patterns of reactivation            
Transient  16  10  62.5  6  37.5  0.508 
Protracted/resolved  3  60  2  40   
Protracted/unresolved  1  20  4  80   
Multiple reactivation  1  33.3  2  66.7   
Unknown  1  50  1  50  

Table 3  Characteristics of DLR of HBV reactivators with patterns of protracted/unresolved (A) and multiple reactivations (B)
Reactivation pattern  Outcome  Cause of death  Type of DLR  Ratio of A/G ratio  Ratio of INR of PT
Died  Hepatic failure  0.62  3.88
Died  Hepatic failure  1.27
Died  Cancer progression  0.86  NA
Died  Cancer progression  0.6  1.38
Alive  NA  NA  NA 
Died  Hepatic failure/cancer progression  NA  1.36

H: HBV reactivation related hepatic failure; N: newly developed coarse liver echotexture; NA: not available. 

Figure 2
 (PDF) Relationship between genotype and liver cirrhosis in HBV reactivators (P = 0.003).

Treatment efficacy among HBV reactivators with different reactivation patterns

Response to chemotherapy (partial response or complete remission) occurred in 10 of 16 patients with transient reactivation, 4 of 5 patients with protracted/resolved reactivation, 2 of 5 patients with protracted/unresolved flare-up, 2 of 3 patients with multiple reactivation and none of 2 patients with unsure pattern. No correlation was found between reactivation pattern and treatment response (P = 0.325). However, patients with a protracted/unresolved reactivation pattern had shorter OS (189±41 d, 95%CI as 108-269 d, Figure 3, P = 0.000).

Figure 3  (PDF) OS in HBV reactivation patients with different reactivation patterns (P = 0.000). (MA: multiple reactivations; PR: protracted/resolved; PU: protracted/unresolved.).

DISCUSSION
In this study, we demonstrated that though there is no survival difference between NHL patients with and without HBV reactivation during chemotherapy, the patients with HBV reactivation do have a long term effect on liver function or liver cirrhosis of the lymphoma survivors by biochemical tests or by imaging modality. HBV genotype C patients may have a higher risk of developing DLR and liver cirrhosis after chemotherapy. Moreover, patients with protracted/unresolved or multiple reactivations are associated with a higher risk of developing DLR and a high incidence of lethal hepatic failure. Furthermore, patients with sustained high titer of HBV DNA leads to poor OS duration compared to other HBV reactivators.
    This study had several limitations. DLR after chemotherapy was defined by common biochemical tests with A/G and PT[19-25] and imaging modality because the condition of the patients (i.e. neutropenia and thrombocytopenia during chemotherapy) made routine performance of liver biopsy during lymphoma treatment problematic. The relatively short follow-up duration also limited this study. The longest follow-up duration was only 8.1 years and this might not have been long enough to observe the full clinical course of HBV infection, such as decompensated liver cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma[27]. The small size was another limitation of this study; and in this study, only 31 patients were HBV reactivation patients. So genotype C of HBV only had a borderline of contribution to develop DLR (P = 0.0768). Therefore, further research is needed to establish the relationships among HBV, chemotherapy and host, and to determine the long-term effects of chemotherapy in lymphoma patients who are hepatitis B carriers.
    Icteric hepatitis in HBV reactivation during chemotherapy may jeopardize the treatment schedule and thereby increase the risk of lymphoma progression and change the OS of patients with HBV reactivation. No difference was found in the treatment response rate and OS (Figure 1A) of between patients with and without HBV reactivation; however, as shown in Table 3 and Figure 3, patients with a protracted/unresolved reactivation pattern had a shorter OS. Protracted/unresolved reactivation was associated with a higher probability of subsequent hepatic failure or postponed chemotherapy schedule, both of which might contribute to shorter OS. However, in this study, only small proportion patients (4 of 31, 13%) was identified with protracted-unresolved pattern of HBV reactivation; so maybe we should enroll more patients to identify whether the reactivation patterns have influence on the survival.
    The worldwide distribution of HBV genotype can be summarized as follows: genotype A is predominant in northern Europe; genotypes B and C are confined to populations with origins in eastern Asia and the Far East; genotype D is found worldwide, but prevails in the Mediterranean area, the Near and Middle East and south Asia; genotype E is indigenous to western sub-Saharan areas; genotype F is likely to be present in populations with origins in the American continent and the newly identified genotype G is found in France and the USA[28]. In Taiwan, the major serotype of HBV is genotype B (about 81%)[29]. Generally speaking, genotype C is associated with more severe liver disease and hepatocellular carcinoma, which may be due to increased risk of HBeAg positivity, higher serum HBV DNA level, less frequent precore stop codon mutation, and a longer immune clearance phase[28].
    In this study, patients with HBV genotype C contributed had a higher rate of impaired liver outcome including post-chemotherapy-related liver cirrhosis. However, among HBV re-activators, the proportion with genotype C who became HBeAg seropositive (1 of 7, 14.3%) was not significantly higher compared to those with genotype B (1 of 21, 4.8%) (P = 0.4444, Fisher’s exact test). Besides, the pre-chemotherapy baseline HBV DNA copy numbers of all genotype C patients were not elevated, and all of them were within 100 copies. This suggests that the mechanism of DLR resulting from genotype C in HBV patients might not be fully explained by HBV DNA amount and HBeAg seropositivity. Host immune reaction response to hepatitis virus[19,30] and viral genomic factors[31,32] may be more predominant factors. Further studies are needed to test this hypothesis.
    Antiviral drugs (i.e. lamivudine) are now commonly used for treatment and prevention of HBV reactivation in HBsAg seropositive patients undergoing cytotoxic chemotherapy[33,34]. They have shown a complete preventative effect of lamivudine, when used before chemotherapy in HBV carriers with lymphoma. However, there is a lack of data on the response to these antiviral drugs in treating or preventing chemotherapy-related HBV reactivation in cancer patients with different HBV genotypes. Further monitoring of the long-term consequences of HBV infection patients either treated or receiving prophylaxis with antiviral agents during chemotherapy and follow-up of the efficacy of these drugs in different HBV genotypes is needed.

ACKNOWLEDGMENT
We are very grateful to Lymphoma Committee of Taiwan Cooperative Oncology Group (TCOG) for their support.

REFERENCES
1    Galbraith RM, Eddleston AL, Williams R, Zuckerman AJ. Fulminant hepatic failure in leukaemia and 
      choriocarcinoma related to withdrawal of cytotoxic drug therapy. Lancet 1975; 2: 528-530
2    Wands JR, Chura CM, Roll FJ, Maddrey WC. Serial studies of hepatitis-associated antigen and antibody in 
      patients receiving antitumor chemotherapy for myeloproliferative and lymphoproliferative disorders. 
      Gastroenterology 1975; 68: 105-112
3    Hoofnagle JH, Dusheiko GM, Schafer DF, Jones EA, Micetich KC, Young RC, Costa J. Reactivation of chronic hepatitis
      B virus infection by cancer chemotherapy. Ann Intern Med 1982; 96: 447-449
4    Thung SN, Gerber MA, Klion F, Gilbert H. Massive hepatic necrosis after chemotherapy withdrawal in a hepatitis B 
      virus carrier. Arch Intern Med 1985; 145: 1313-1314
5    Lau JY, Lai CL, Lin HJ, Lok AS, Liang RH, Wu PC, Chan TK, Todd D. Fatal reactivation of chronic hepatitis B virus 
      infection following withdrawal of chemotherapy in lymphoma patients. Q J Med 1989; 73: 911-917
6    Pariente EA, Goudeau A, Dubois F, Degott C, Gluckman E, Devergie A, Brechot C, Schenmetzler C, Bernuau J. 
      Fulminant hepatitis due to reactivation of chronic hepatitis B virus infection after allogeneic bone marrow 
      transplantation. Dig Dis Sci 1988; 33: 1185-1191
7    Liang RH, Lok AS, Lai CL, Chan TK, Tood D, Chiu EK. Hepatitis B infection in patients with lymphoma. Hematol 
      Oncol 1990; 8: 261-270
8    Lok AS, Liang RH, Chiu EK, Wong KL, Chan TK, Todd D. Reactivation of hepatitis B virus replication in patients 
      receiving cytotoxic therapy. Report of a prospective study. Gastroenterology 1991; 100: 182-188
9    Liaw YF. Hepatitis viruses under immunosuppressive agents. J Gastroentrol Hepatol 1998; 13: 14-20
10    Alexopoulos CG, Vaslamatzis M, Hatzidimitriou G. Prevalence of hepatitis B virus marker positivity and evaluation 
       of hepatitis B virus profile, during chemotherapy, in patients with solid tumors. Br J Cancer 1999; 81: 69-74
11    Markovic S, Drozina G, Vovk M, Fidler-Jenko M. Reactivation of hepatitis B but not hepatits C in patients with 
       malignant lymphoma and immunosuppressive therapy. A prospective study in 305 patients. 
       Hepatogastroenterology 1999; 46: 2925-2930
12    Liang R, Lau GK, Kwong YL. Chemotherapy and bone marrow transplantation for cancer patients who are also 
       chronic hepatitis B carriers: a review of the problem. J Clin Oncol 1999; 17: 394-398
13    Cheng AL. Steroid-free chemotherapy decreases the risk of hepatitis flare-up in hepatitis B virus carriers 
       with non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. Blood 1996; 87: 1202
14    Kumagai K, Takagi T, Nakamura S, Sawada U, Kura Y, Kodama F, Shimano S, Kudoh I, Nakamura H, Sawada 
       K, Ohnoshi T. Hepatitis B virus carriers in the treatment of malignant lymphoma: an epidemiological study in Japan. 
       Ann Oncol 1997: 8(Suppl 1): 107-109
15    Faggiolli P, De Paschale M, Tocci A, Luoni M, Fava S, De Pali A, Tosi A, Cassi E. Acute hepatic toxicity during 
       cyclic chemotherapy in non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. Hematologica 1997; 82: 38-42
16    Perrillo RP. Acute flares in chronic hepatitis B: the natural and unnatural history of an immunologically mediated 
       liver disease. Gastroenterology 2001; 120: 1009-1022
17    Cheng AL, Hsiung CA, Su IJ, Chen PJ, Chang MC, Tsao CJ, Kao WY, Uen WC, Hsu CH, Tien HF, Chao TY, Chen 
       LT, Wang-Peng J. Lymphoma Committee of Taiwan Cooperative Oncology Group. Steroid-free chemotherapy 
       decreases risk of hepatitis B virus (HBV) reactivation in HBV-carriers with lymphoma. Hepatology 2003; 37: 1320-1328
18    Kao JH, Chen PJ, Lai MY, Chen DS. Hepatitis B genotypes correlate with clinical outcomes in patients with 
       chronic hepatitis B. Gastroenterology 2000; 118: 554-559
19    Triger DR, Wright R. Hyperglobulinaemia in liver disease. Lancet 1973; 1: 1494-1496
20    Czaja AJ, Wolf AM, Baggenstoss AH. Clinical assessment of cirrhosis in severe chronic active liver disease: 
       specificity and sensitivity of physical and laboratory findings. Mayo Clin Proc 1980; 55: 360-364
21    Lin DY, Liaw YF, Chu CM, Chang-Chien CS, Wu CS, Chen PC, Sheen IS. Hepatocellular carcinoma in 
       noncirrhosis patients. A laparoscopic study of 92 cases in Taiwan. Cancer 1984; 54: 1466-1468
22    Luo JC, Hwang SJ, Chang FY, Chu CW, Lai CR, Wang YJ, Lee PC, Tsay SH, Lee SD. Simple blood tests can 
       predict compensated liver cirrhosis in patients with chronic hepatitis C. Hepatogastroenterology 2002; 49: 478-481
23    Schlichting P, Christensen E, Andersen PK, Fauerholdt L, Juhl E, Poulsen H, Tygstrup N. Prognostic factors in 
       cirrhosis identified by Cox’s regression model. Hepatology 1983; 3: 889-895
24    Oberti F, Valsesia E, Pilette C, Rousselet MC, Bedossa P, Aubé C, Gallois Y, Rifflet H, Maiga MY, Penneau-Fontbonne 
       D, Cales P. Noninvasive Diagnosis of hepatic fibrosis or cirrhosis. Gastroenterology 1997; 113: 1609-1616
25    Nagamatsu H, Kumashiro R, Itano S, Matsugaki S, Sata M. Investigation of associating factors in exacerbation of 
       liver damage after chemotherapy in patients with HBV-related HCC. Hepatol Res 2003; 26: 293-301
26    Christensen E, Schlichting P, Fauerholdt L, Gluud C, Andersen PK, Juhl E, Poulsen H, Tygstrup N. Prognostic value
       of Child-Turcotte criteria in medically treated cirrhosis. Hepatology 1984; 4: 430-435
27    Fattovich G. Natural history and prognosis of hepatitis B. Semin Liver Dis 2003; 23: 47-58
28    Kao JH. Hepatitis B viral genotypes: clinical relevance and molecular characteristics. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2002; 
       17: 643-650
29    Liu CJ, Kao JH, Chen PJ, Lai MY, Chen DS. Molecular epidemiology of hepatitis B viral serotypes and genotypes 
       in Taiwan. J Biomed Sci 2002; 9: 166-170
30    Kao JH, Chen PJ, Lai MY, Chen DS. Hepatitis B virus genotypes and spontaneous hepatitis B e antigen seroconversion 
       in Taiwanese hepatitis B carriers. J Med Virol 2004; 72: 363-369
31    Grandjacques C, Pradat P, Stuyver L, Chevallier M, Chevallier P, Pichoud C, Maisonnas M, Trepo C, Zoulim F. 
       Rapid detection of genotypes and mutations in the pre-core promotor and the pre-core region of hepatitis B 
       virus genome: correlation with viral persistence and disease severity. J Hepatol 2000; 33: 430-439
32    Rodriguez-Frias F, Buti M, Jardi R, Cotrina M, Viladomiu L, Esteban R, Guardia J. Hepatitis B virus infection: 
       precore mutants and its relation to viral genotypes and core mutations. Hepatology 1995; 22: 1641-1647
33    Lau GK, Yiu HH, Fong DY, Cheng HC, Au WY, Lai LS, Cheung M, Zhang HY, Lie A, Ngan R, Liang R. Early is superior 
       to deferred preemptive lamivudine therapy for hepatitis B patients undergoing chemotherapy. Gastroenterology 
       2003; 125: 1742-1749
34    Yeo W, Chan PK, Ho WM, Zee B, Lam KC, Lei KI, Chan AT, Mok TS, Lee JJ, Leung TW, Zhong S, Johnson PJ. 
       Lamivudine for the prevention of hepatitis B virus reactivation in hepatitis B s-antigen seropositive cancer 
       patients undergoing cytotoxic chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol 2004; 22: 927-934

Science Editor Guo SY  Language Editor Elsevier HK

 

Reviews Add
more>>


Related Articles:
Detection of soluble TRAIL in HBV infected patients and its clinical implications
Detection of anti-preS1 antibodies for recovery of hepatitis B patients by immunoassay
Preliminary results of Thymosin-a1 versus interferon-alpha-treatment in patients with HBeAg negative and serum HBV DNA positive chronic hepatitis B
Orthotopic liver transplantation for fulminant hepatitis B
Clinical study on the treatment of liver fibrosis due to hepatitis B by IFN-alpha1 and traditional medicine preparation
more>>