|
Wen-Hua Xiao,
Department of Oncology, 304th Hospital of PLA, Beijing 100037, China
Wei-Wen Liu, Department of Gastroenterology, Southwest
Hospital, Third Military Medical University, Chongqing 400038, China
Correspondence to: Wen-Hua Xiao, PhD, Associate
Professor, Department of Oncology, 304th Hospital of PLA, Beijing 100037,
China. w_hxiao@hotmail.com
Telephone: +86-10-66867324 Fax:
+86-10-66867672 Received: 2003-05-11 Accepted:
2003-06-02
Abstract AIM: To
analyze the genetic and epigenetic alterations of RUNX3 gene, a potential
putative tumor suppressor gene, in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).
METHODS: PCR-based loss of
heterozygosity (LOH) detection, analysis of mutation with PCR-single
strand conformational polymorphism (SSCP) and sequencing, and methylation
study with methylation specific PCR (MSP) were performed on RUNX3 gene in
a series of 62 HCCs along with their matched normal tissues.
RESULTS: Mutation of RUNX3 gene was
not found, but one single nucleotide polymorphism with T to A transversion
at the second nucleotide of the 18th condon was found. Nine of 26
informative cases (34.6%) showed allelic loss on the polymorphic site and
30 cases (48.4%) revealed hypermethylation of RUNX3 gene in promoter CpG
islands. Furthermore, of the 9 cases with LOH, 8 (88.9%) also had
hypermethylation.
CONCLUSION: Our findings indicate that
inactivation of RUNX3 gene through allelic loss and promoter
hypermethylation might be one of the major mechanisms in hepatocellualr
carcinogenesis.
Xiao WH, Liu WW. Hemizygous
deletion and hypermethylation of RUNX3 gene in hepatocellular carcinoma.
World J Gastroenterol 2004;
10(3):376-380 http://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/10/376.asp
INTRODUCTION Transforming growth
factor-b (TGF-b) is a multifunctional cytokine known to be a potent
growth inhibitor for most epithelial cells[1,2]. TGF-b signaling pathway is composed of TGF-b type I, type II receptors and Smad proteins, and is
transducted by forming heteromeric complex with its type I and type II
transmembrane Ser/Thr kinase receptors. Activated type I receptors then
activate the cytoplasmic Smad 2 and Smad 3 by phosphorylation, allowing
them to form a hetermeric complex with Smad 4. This Smad complex can
activate TGF-beta responsive gene transcription only after it is
translocated to nucleus and bound to the specific target nuclear matrix
site[2]. However, the key process of nuclear translocation and
subnuclear distribution for regulating transcription of TGF-b-responsive gene needs a broad range of nuclear
proteins[3]. Recently, RUNX proteins, including RUNX3 gene were
proved to interact through their C-terminal segment with Smads and recruit
Smads to subnuclear sites of active transcription, thus exerting their
biological control[4]. The function of RUNX proteins has been
considered as the subnuclear acceptor proteins for signal transduction. On
the contrary, Smads cannot be directed to the nuclear matrix in the
absence of RUNX proteins[4]. Therefore, TGF-b-Smad signal pathway would be disrupted. RUNX3, one
member of the RUNT domain family, was recently found with a loss of 40-60% of expression due to a
highly frequency of hemizygous deletion and hypermethylation in gastric
cancer[5]. Also, the gastric mucosa of RUNX3 knocked out mouse
exhibited hyperplasia and suppressed apoptosis and growth-inhibition
induced by TGF-b in epithelial cells[5]. Taken together, it
is strongly suggested that RUNX3 gene be a novel tumor-suppressor
gene.
Hepatocelluar carcinoma (HCC) is one of the most common causes of
cancer death in the world, especially in Asia and Africa[6,7].
HCC, like many other kinds of human malignancy, has been reported to
overexpress TGF-b[8]. The serum concentration of TGF-b is also elevated with tumor progression[9].
Therefore, HCC cells resistant to the anti-proliferative function of
TGF-b may
be a critical step in the development of HCC[10]. However,
until the present no molecular event has been found to contribute to the
impairment of TGF-b signal pathway in HCC[11]. It is well documented
that aberrance of molecules of the pathway including TGF-b receptor, Smads 2, 3, 4, 6 and 7 was very rare in
HCC[12-14]. The exact mechanism of HCC with loss of TGF-b responsiveness still remains unknown. A growing body
of evidence showed that chromosome 1p36 was a common deletion region where
just loci of RUNX3 gene exist[15,16]. Several putative tumor
suppressor genes are believed to be in this region. But, different types
of tumor have different regions of consensus deletion. For example, the
consensus deletion of neuroblastoma has been mapped to 1p36.2-36.3, a
region distal to the deleted region in HCC. While in HCC, a minimally
deleted region of about 4 Mb on chromosome 1p36 was well
defined[17]. Within the common deletion region, another
candidate tumor suppressor gene, retinoblastoma protein (Rb)-interacting
zinc finger gene (RIZ) was also identified[18]. Unfortunately,
mutation of RIZ gene was not found in HCC[15]. Its role in
hepatocarcinogenesis has not been clarified yet. Most notably, LOH
encompassing RUNX3 gene occurs in early stage of HCC, even in precancerous
condition[19,20]. In the current paper, we studied the genetic
and epigenetic alterations of RUNX3 gene in HCC in order to find out new
clues to the development of HCC.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Tissue samples Sixty-two frozen HCC
specimens and their adjacent normal liver tissue specimens were obtained
from Southwest Hospital, Third Military Medical University, Chongqing,
China. Informed consents were obtained from every patient. The patients
age ranged 29-72 years with an average of 48.6 years. The male to female
ratio was 52:10. The background liver showed cirrhosis in 53 (85.4%)
cases, chronic persistent hepatitis in 6 cases (9.7%), and non-specific
change in 3 (3.2%) cases. HBV was detected in 49 cases (79.0%), HCV was
detected in 5 (8.1%) and non-virus hepatitis in 8 (12.8%). The number of
cases with histological grades I, II and III was 8, 26, 28, respectively.
Three pathologists reviewed independently one 5 mm thick section stained with hematoxylin and
eosin.
DNA extraction
Frozen tissue samples were ground into very fine powder
in liquid nitrogen, suspended in lysis buffer and treated with proteinase
K. DNA was extracted by phenol-chloroform-isoamyl alcohol and ethanol
precipitation[21]. Adjacent normal liver tissues were used as
corresponding normal controls.
Single strand conformational
polymorphism (SSCP) and DNA sequencing A total of 6
exons of RUNX3 gene were screened for inactivation mutations with
PCR-SSCP, cyclic sequencing on genomic DNA templates. The primers were
designed with OLIGO software program (version 5.0; National Bioscience
Inc., Plymouth. MN) using the genomic sequences obtained from GenBank
(accession No. NT_004391). PCR primer pairs for amplification of RUNX3
gene are described in Table 1. Each PCR reaction except for exon 2 was
performed under standard conditions in a 10 ml reaction mixture containing 1 ml of template DNA, 0.5 mM of each primer, 0.2 mM of each dNTP, 1.5 mM
MgCI2, 0.5 unit of Taq polymerase (Ampli Taq GoldTM
containing antibody to Taq, Roche), 0.5 mCi of 32P-dCTP (Amersham, Buckinghamshire,
UK), and 1 ml of 10X buffer. AdvantageR-GC genomic PCR
kit (Clontech Laboratories, Inc., CA, USA) was used to amplify exon 2
containing CpG-rich sequence according to the user manual. The reaction
mixture was denatured for 5 min at 95 �C and incubated for 35 cycles (denaturing for 30 s at 95
�C, annealing for 30 s at 51-67 �C, and extending for 30 s at 72 �C). A final extension was continued for 5 min at 72
�C in a thermal cycler (PE 480, USA). After
amplification, the PCR products were denatured for 5 min at 95 �C at 1:1 dilution of sample buffer containing 98%
formamide/5 mmol/L NaOH and loaded onto a SSCP gel (FMC mutation detection
enhancement system, Intermountain Scientific, Kaysville, UT) with 10%
glycerol. After electrophoresis, the gels were transferred to 3-mm Whatman
paper and dried, and autoradiography was performed with Kodak X-OMAT film
(Eastman Kodak, Rochester, NY). For the detection of mutations, DNAs
showing mobility shifts were cut out from the dried gel, and reamplified
for 30 cycles using the same primer set. Sequencing kit (Perkin-Elmer,
Foster City, CA) was used according to the manufacturer�s recommendations.
Cycling sequencing products were resolved on a 6% denatured sequencing gel
(USBTM, Cleveland, USA).
Loss of heterozygosity (LOH)
analysis We found 1 polymorphic site during SSCP
and sequencing analysis using the primer sets covering 6 exons. The
polymorphic site had highly frequent information of heterozygote in HCC
patients. This made it feasible as an intragenic polymorphic marker for
LOH analysis of RUNX3 gene. PCR and SSCP conditions for LOH analysis were
exactly the same as described above. PCR products from the corresponding
normal and tumor DNAs were run on SSCP gel. Allelic loss was scored when
the band intensity of one allelic marker was significantly decreased (more
than 70% reduction) in tumor DNA as compared with that in normal DNA.
DNA methylation analysis of
RUNX3 gene by methylation specific PCR (MSP) The
methylation status of RUNX3 gene was determined by sodium bisulfate
treatment of DNA followed by methylation-specific polymerase chain
reaction (MSP), as described with modification[22,23]. In
brief, about 100 ng DNA was incubated in 0.2 M NaOH at 42 �C for 30 minutes in a total volume of 50 ml. After the addition of 350 ml of 3.6 M sodium bisulfate (Sigma) containing 1 mM
hydroquinone at pH 5, the samples were incubated for 4-5 hours at 55 �C in the dark. The modified DNA was recovered with 5
ml of glassmilk (BIO 101, Inc., CA, USA) and 800 ml of 6 M NaI. The glassmilk catching the modified DNA
was washed three times with 70% ethanol at room temperature, and then
treated with 0.3 M NaOH/90% ethanol once, washed twice again with 90%
ethanol. The DNA was finally eluted from the dried pellet with 30 ml of 1 mM Tris-HCI (pH 8.0) for 15 minutes at 55 �C. Five mL of bisulfate-modified DNA was subjected to MSP using
two sets of primer specific for methylation detection and unmethylation
detection as reported previously[5]. PCR was performed in a
total volume of 30 ml containing 5 ml template DNA, 0.5 mM of each primer, 0.2 mM of each dNTP, 1.5 mM
MgCI2, 0.5 unit of Taq polymerase (Ampli Taq GoldTM
containing antibody to Taq, Roche) and 3 ml of 10X buffer. The reaction solution was initially
denatured at 95 �C for 1 minute. Amplification was carried out for 40
cycles at 95 �C for 30 s, at 63 �C for 30 s and at 72 �C for 30 s, followed by a final extension at 72 �C for 5 min. Controls without DNA were performed for
each set for PCRs. Ten ml of PCR products was directly loaded onto 2% agarose
gel containing ethidium bromide, and directly visualized under UV
illumination, and photographed. The size of PCR products was 234 bp.
RESULTS Frequency
of LOH in RUNX3 gene and its clinical significance
We failed to detect a mutation in all six exons and
partial intron adjacent to exon in 62 HCCs by PCR-SSCP and sequencing. But
the polymorphic site with T to A transition at the second nucleotide of
codon 18 was found at exon 1, a relatively high frequency of heterozygotes
(26/62) was used as an intragenic marker to examine LOH of RUNX3 gene, and
34.6% (9/26) of informative cases showed allelic loss (Figure 1).
Figure 1(PDF) Allelic loss of RUNX3 gene in HCC.
N: normal, T: tumor, Arrow indicate allelic loss. Figure 2(PDF) Methylation state of
RUNX3 gene in HCC. M: Molecular weight of 50 bp DNA ladder, u:
unmethylation, m: methylation, N: normal, T: tumor.
Table 1 Primers used
for PCR amplification of RUNX3 gene
| Name |
Exon |
Primer
sequence |
Annealing
Tm(�C) |
Size
(bp) |
| RUNX3_E1 |
1 |
F:5'-CTGGCCACAGCTCCCCACC-3� |
64 |
158 |
|
|
R:5'-ATCCCAACCCAACCCCCTGAAG-3� |
|
|
| RUNX3_E2-1 |
2 |
F5'-CTGCTTTCCCGCTTCTCGCGGCAGC-3� |
62 |
212 |
|
|
R:5'-CGCCGCTGTTCTCGCCCATCTTGCC-3� |
|
|
| RUNX3_E2-2 |
2 |
F:5-CCAAGCACCAGCCGCCGCTTCACAC-3� |
65 |
207 |
|
|
R:5'-GAGGAAGTTGGGGCTGTCGGTGCGC-3� |
|
|
| RUNX3_E2-3 |
2 |
F:5'-CTCGATGGTGGACGTGCTGGCGGAC-3� |
62 |
230 |
|
|
R:5'-GTCTCGGGCACCTCCCATCCCCACT-3� |
|
|
| RUNX3_E3 |
3 |
F:5'-TGCCATTGCCAATGCTGAA-3� |
58 |
240 |
|
|
R:5'-TAAGCTGTCCCCCTGCATCC-3� |
|
|
| RUNX3_E4
|
4
|
F:5'-GCACTGGACCCTCCTCCC-3�
|
60
|
187 |
|
|
R:5'-CACCTGCCTCTATTCCCCACT-3�
|
|
|
| RUNX3_E5
|
5
|
F:5'-CGCTGCAGCCCCTCCCTC-3� |
65
|
225
|
|
|
R:5'-GGGGAAGCAACGGCTGATGG-3� |
|
|
| RUNX3_E6-1 |
6
|
F:5'-GTTGTTAGGGTCCCCGCCTCC-3� |
63
|
224
|
|
|
R:5'-CTACCCGCATGCTGGCCTCTT-3� |
|
|
| RUNX3_E6-2 |
6
|
F:5'-CGCTGCTGGTGCAAGAGG-3�
|
63
|
205
|
|
|
R:5'-ACCAGCCGCTTCCACCATAC-3�
|
|
|
| RUNX3_E6-3
|
6
|
F:5'-TGGCGGGAGGTAGGTATGGTG-3�
|
63
|
166
|
|
|
R:5'-GCCAACCCTCACGGAGAGC-3' |
|
|
| RUNX3_E6-4 |
6
|
F:5'-AATGCATCCTGGGGTCTGG-3'
|
61
|
150
|
|
|
R:5'-GGGTTGTCTCGAGCTGGAACT-3�
|
|
|
Frequent hypermethylation of
RUNX3 gene in HCC On the basis of the presence of a
CpG island in the 5 region of RUNX3 gene, we examined the promoter 2
hypermethylation using two sets of primers specific for MSP reported by
Li[5], and 48.4% (30/62) HCCs were found to have
hypermethylation (Figure 2). Notably, we found the degree of
hypermethylation was quite different among individual tumors by comparing
with the intensity between unmethylation and methylation bands under the
same PCR conditions. Although our methods could not be used to quantitate
methylation, hypermethylation was not found in the matching normal liver
tissues.
Biallelic aberrant of RUNX3 gene
in HCC LOH and hypermethylation are two distinct
ways to inactivate tumor suppressor gene. It is widely known that both of
them were often involved in complete loss of gene function through
cooperation. We, here, found 8 cases had hypermethylation in the 9 cases
with LOH of RUNX3 gene.
DISCUSSION RUNX3
gene has been found belonging to the runt domain family of transcription
factors acting as master regulators of gene expression in major
developmental pathway[3]. At present, three RUNX genes, RUNX1,
RUNX2 and RUNX3, have been identified. All the three genes have been found
to share a highly conserved region, called runt domain[24].
They have been shown to interact with Smads 1, 2, 3 and 5, and are
indispensable in mediating Smads compound nuclear distribution and Smads
specific binding to target DNA[25,4]. Therefore, RUNX proteins
are important targets of TGF-beta-Smads signaling pathway. It is well
documented that mutation of RUNX1 gene was associated with the development
of acute myelogenous leukemia, while mutation of RUNX2 contributed to
celeidocranial dysplasia (CCD)[25]. Recently, RUNX3 gene was
found to play an important role during the development of gastric cancer.
Its absence would lead to abnormal proliferation of gastric epithelial
cells, lack of responsiveness to apoptosis and growth-inhibitory effect
induced by TGF-beta in knock out mouse. Moreover, wild type RUNX3 gene
significantly reduced the tumorigenesis ability of tumor cells, whereas
mutant type RUNX3 gene would abolish the tumor suppressor action of RUNX3
in nude mice and drive tumor cells to grow much faster. In human primary
gastric tumor, 60% cases do not significantly express RUNX3 gene because
of hemizygous deletion and hypermethylation. Correlation between
hypermethylation and under-expression or no expression was further
confirmed in in vitro experiment[5]. These evidences strongly
suggest that RUNX3 gene be a tumor suppressor gene. It is
commonly known that TGF-beta-Smad signal pathway is disrupted in HCC, but
the exact mechanism of disruption of the signal pathway has still remained
to be worked out[8]. Furthermore, LOH of 1p36 encompassing
RUNX3 gene was a common event in pathogenesis of HCC[19]. So,
it is reasonable to consider RUNX3 gene as a most possible target gene in
the development of HCC. In this study, we found 34.6% of HCC showed LOH of
RUNX3. This result is in concordance with the previously reported 30% more
or less frequency of LOH at 1p36, an early event in the development of
HCC[17,20]. Unfortunately, no mutation was discovered in 62
HCCs.
Hypermethylation is a regional event that occurs frequently in
GC-rich sequences, called CpG islands, often located within the 5
regulatory regions of non-transcribed genes. In contrast, actively
transcribed genes are always in unmethylation status. Inactivation of
genes by hypermethylation of their CpG islands has been well
clarified[21,26,27]. Now, it has been recognized that
hypermethylation of CpG islands in the promoter region is an alternative
way to silence some cancer-associated gene as effectively as inactivation
by mutation or deletion[28,29]. To date, genes involved in
regulation of cell cycle[21,30], DNA repair[31],
angiogenesis[32], and apoptosis[33,34] have been
shown to be inactivated by hypermethylation which is also a frequent event
in many human cancers including hepatocellular
carcinoma[35-37]. For RUNX3 gene, transcription is regulated by
two distinct promoters, P1 and P2. The major RUNX3 mRNA is transcribed
from P2. The genomic region surrounding the P2 promoter constituted a
large (4.2 kb) CpG island with a GC content of 64%[24]. These
features showed P2 possessed the hallmark characteristics of GC-rich
promoters. So, it is rational that transcription from P2 should be
regulated by DNA methylation in theory. In practice, Li et
al[5] confirmed the presumption in in vitro experiment. Our
analysis of RUNX3 gene in HCCs provided evidence of promoter
hypermethylation, a common alteration as well as an early event. Thus,
methylation of the promoter region appears to be the dominant mode of
inactivation of RUNX3 gene in human HCC, just the same as in human gastric
cancer. Unfortunately, we did not detect the expression of RUNX3 gene due
to unavailability of the sample and antibody. However, methylation changes
are considered as a surrogate for altered expression of the gene product,
thus, the detection of any abnormally methylated site is a strong
indication that this mechanism could alter the expression levels of target
genes. It was reported that hypermethylation correlated with LOH and often
occurred before the allelic loss[38]. We found in our study
48.3%(30/62) of HCCs showed hypermethylation, which was higher than LOH
(34.6%), and 88.9%(8/9) of HCCs with LOH had hypermethylation in the
promoter of RUNX3 gene, hence being in line with Knudson�s two hit
hypothesis and consistent with previous reports. In summary, we
have demonstrated a high frequency of RUNX3 gene aberration-allelic loss
together with hypermethylation of the remaining alleles in HCC. These
observations can provide the evidence that promoter hypermethylation and
allelic loss are the major mechanisms for inactivation of RUNX3 gene in
HCC. RUNX3 gene may be one of the key tumor suppressor genes at 1p36 which
is the common deletion site of RUNX3 gene in HCC. Inactivation of RUNX3
gene functions, resulting in impairment of TGF-beta -Smads signal pathway
and other tumor suppressor function, may be closely associated with the
development of HCC.
REFERENCES 1 Kloos DU, Choi C, Wingender
E. The TGF-beta-Smad network: introducing bioinformatic tools.
Trends Genet 2002; 18: 96-103
2 Moustakas A, Pardali K, Gaal
A, Heldin C. Mechanisms of TGF-beta signaling in regulation of cell growth
and differentiation. Immunol Lett 2002;
82: 85-91 3 Leboy P, Grasso-Knight G,
D扐ngelo M, Volk SW,
Lian JV, Drissi H, Stein GS, Adams SL. Smad-Runx interactions
during chondrocyte maturation. J Bone
Joint Surg Am 2001; 83A (Pt 1): S15-22 4 Zaidi SK, Sullivan AJ, van
Wijnen AJ, Stein JL, Stein GS, Lian JB. Integration of Runx and Smad
regulatory signals at transcriptionally
active subnuclear sites. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2002; 99:8048-8053
5 Li QL, Ito K, Sakaura C,
Fukamachi H, Inoue K, Chi XZ, Lee KY, Nomura S, Lee CW, Han SB, Kim HM,
Kim WJ, Yamamoto H, Yamashita N, Yano T,
Ikeda T, Itohara S, Inazawa J, Abe T, Hagiwara A, Yamagishi H, Ooe A,
Kaneda A, Sugimura T, Ushijima T,
Bae SC, Ito Y. Causal relationship between the loss of RUNX3 expression
and gastric cancer. Cell 2002;
109: 113-124
6 Korn WM. Moving toward an
understanding of the metastatics process in hepatocellular carcinoma.
World J Gastroentrol 2001;
7:777-778 7 Qin LX, Tang ZY. The
prognostic significance of clinical and pathological features in
hepatocellular carcinoma. World J
Gastroenterol 2002; 8: 193-199 8 Bedossa P, Peltier E, Terris
B, Franco D, Poynard T. Transforming growth factor-beta1 (TGF-beta1) and
TGF-beta1 receptors in normal,
cirrhotic, and neoplastic human livers. Hepatology 1995; 21: 760-766
9 Shirai Y, Kawata S, Tamura S,
Ito N, Tsushima H, Takaishi K, Kiso S, Matsuzawa Y. Plasma transforming
growth factor-beta 1 in patients with
hepatocellular carcinoma. Comparison with other liver diseases.
Cancer 1994; 73: 2275-2279
10
Song BC, Chung YH, Kim JA, Choi WB, Suh DD, Pyo SI, Shin JW, Lee
HC, Lee YS, Suh DJ. Transforming growth
factor-beta1 as a useful serologic marker of small hepatocellular
carcinoma. Cancer 2002; 94: 175-180 11
Matsuzaki K, Date M, Furukawa F, Tahashi Y, Matsushita M, Sugano Y,
Yamashiki N, Nakagawa T, Seki T,
Nishizawa M, Fujisawa J, Inoue K.
Regulatory mechanisms for transforming growth factor beta as an autocrine
inhibitor in human hepatocellular
carcinoma: implications for roles of smads in its growth. Hepatology 2000;
32: 218-227 12
Kawate S, Takenoshita S, Ohwada S, Mogi A, Fukusato T, Makita F,
Kuwano H, Morishita Y. Mutation analysis
of transforming growth factor beta type
II receptor, Smad2, and Smad4 in hepatocellular carcinoma. Int J
Oncol 1999; 14: 127-131
13 Kawate S, Ohwada S, Hamada K,
Koyama T, Takenoshita S, Morishita Y, Hagiwara K. Mutational analysis of
the Smad 6 and Smad 7 genes in
hepatocellular carcinoma. Int J Mol Med 2001; 8:49-52 14
Schutte M, Hruban RH, Hedrick L, Cho KR, Nadasdy GM, Weinstein CL,
Bova GS, Isaacs WB, Cairns P, Nawroz
H, Sidransky D, Casero RA Jr,
Meltzer PS, Hahn SA, Kern SE. DPC4 gene in various tumor types. Cancer
Res 1996; 56: 2527-2530
15
Simon D, Knowles BB, Weith A. Abnormalities of chromosome 1 and
loss of heterozygosity on 1p in primary
hepatomas. Oncogene 1991; 6:
765-770 16
Yeh SH, Chen PJ, Chen HL, Lai MY, Wang CC, Chen DS. Frequent
genetic alterations at the distal region of
chromosome 1p in human hepatocellular
carcinomas. Cancer Res 1994; 54: 4188-4192 17
Fang W, Piao Z, Simon D, Sheu JC, Huang S. Mapping of a minimal
deleted region in human hepatocellular
carcinoma to 1p36.13-p36.23 and
mutational analysis of the RIZ (PRDM2) gene localized to the region. Genes
Chromosomes Cancer 2000; 28:
269-275 18
Huang S. The retinoblastoma protein-interacting zinc finger gene
RIZ in 1p36-linked cancers. Front
Biosci 1999; 4: D528-D532
19
Kuroki T, Fujiwara Y, Tsuchiya E, Nakamori S, Imaoka S, Kanematsu
T, Nakamura Y. Accumulation of genetic
changes during development and
progression of hepatocellular carcinoma: loss of heterozygosity of
chromosome arm 1p occurs at an
early stage of hepatocarcinogenesis. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 1995; 13:
163-167 20
Sun M, Eshleman JR, Ferrell LD, Jacobs G, Sudilovsky EC, Tuthill R,
Hussein MR, Sudilovsky O. An early lesion in
hepatic carcinogenesis: loss of
heterozygosity in human cirrhotic livers and dysplastic nodules at the
1p36-p34 region. Hepatology 2001;
33: 1415-1424 21
Liu LH, Xiao WH, Liu WW. Effect of 5-Aza-2-deoxycytidine on the p16
tumor suppressor gene in hepatocellular
carcinoma cell line HepG2. World J
Gastroentrol 2001; 7: 131-135 22
Lehmann U, Hasemeier B, Lilischkis R, Kreipe H. Quantitative
analysis of promoter hypermethylation in
laser-microdissected archival specimens. Lab Invest 2001; 81: 635-638
23
Grunau C, Clark SJ, Rosenthal A. Bisulfite genomic sequencing:
systematic investigation of critical
experimental parameters. Nucleic Acids
Res 2001; 29: E65 24
Bangsow C, Rubins N, Glusman G, Bernstein Y, Negreanu V, Goldenberg
D, Lotem J, Ben-Asher E, Lancet D, Levanon
D, Groner Y. The RUNX3 gene-sequence,
structure and regulated expression. Gene 2001; 279: 221-232
25
Cohen MM Jr. RUNX genes, neoplasia, and cleidocranial dysplasia. Am
J Med Genet 2001; 104: 185-188 26
Baylin SB, Herman JG, Graff JR, Vertino PM, Issa JP. Alterations in
DNA methylation: a fundamental aspect of
neoplasia. Adv Cancer Res 1998; 72:
141-196 27 Esteller M, Corn PG, Baylin SB, Herman
JG. A gene hypermethylation profile of human cancer. Cancer
Res 2001; 61:3225-3229
28
Jones PA, Laird PW. Cancer epigenetics comes of age. Nat Genet
1999; 21: 163-167 29
Wajed SA, Laird PW, DeMeester TR. DNA methylation: an alternative
pathway to cancer. Ann Surg 2001; 234: 10-20 30 Roncalli M, Bianchi P, Bruni B, Laghi L,
Destro A, Di Gioia S, Gennari L, Tommasini M, Malesci A, Coggi G.
Methylation framework of cell cycle gene
inhibitors in cirrhosis and associated hepatocellular carcinoma.
Hepatology 2002; 36: 427-432
31 Esteller M, Hamilton SR, Burger PC,
Baylin SB, Herman JG. Inactivation of the DNA repair gene
O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase
by promoter hypermethylation is a common event in primary human neoplasia.
Cancer Res 1999; 59: 793-797 32
Li Q, Ahuja N, Burger PC, Issa JP. Methylation and silencing of the
Thrombospondin-1 promoter in human
cancer. Oncogene 1999; 18:
3284-3289 33
Teitz T, Lahti JM, Kidd VJ. Aggressive childhood neuroblastomas do
not express caspase-8: an important component
of programmed cell death. J Mol Med
2001; 79: 428-436 34
Jones PA. Cancer. Death and methylation. Nature 2001; 409:
141-144 35
Shen L, Ahuja N, Shen Y, Habib NA, Toyota M, Rashid A, Issa JP. DNA
methylation and environmental exposures
in human hepatocellular carcinoma.
J Natl Cancer Inst 2002; 94: 755-761
36
Zhong S, Tang MW, Yeo W, Liu C, Lo YM, Johnson PJ. Silencing of
GSTP1 gene by CpG island DNA hypermethylation
in HBV-associated hepatocellular
carcinomas. Clin Cancer Res 2002; 8:1087-1092 37
Yoshikawa H, Matsubara K, Qian GS, Jackson P, Groopman JD, Manning
JE, Harris CC, Herman JG. SOCS-1, a
negative regulator of the JAK/STAT
pathway, is silenced by methylation in human hepatocellular carcinoma and
shows growth-suppression activity. Nat
Genet 2001; 28: 29-35 38
Makos M, Nelkin BD, Reiter RE, Gnarra JR, Brooks J, Isaacs W,
Linehan M, Baylin SB. Regional DNA hypermethylation
at D17S5 precedes structural changes in
the progression of renal tumour. Cancer Res 1993; 53: 2719-2722
Edited by Zhu
LH and Wang XL
|
|