Home
  2010.09.03.Fir.
E-Journal
Online Submissions
Feed Back
Papers With
a High
Impact Factor
Links
Visiting Times:
    
Visiting Times
  of Today:
      
 Now Online:
      
 
Notice from Thomson/ISI 2006-07-14: World Journal of Gastroenterology has been re-accepted for coverage in Current Contents/Clinical Medicine and SCIE.
 HTML      PDF

Rahman SH, Azam MG, Rahman MA, Arfin MS, Alam MM, Bhuiyan TM, Ahmed N, Rahman M, Nahar S, Hassan MS.Non-invasive diagnosis of H pylori infection: Evaluation of serological tests with and without current infection marker CIM.
World J Gastroenterol 2008 February;14(8):1231-1236

Non-invasive diagnosis of H pylori infection: Evaluation of serological tests with and without current infection marker CIM

Rahman SH, Azam MG, Rahman MA, Arfin MS, Alam MM, Bhuiyan TM, Ahmed N, Rahman M, Nahar S, Hassan MS.

Clinical Pathologist, Department of Microbiology, Dhaka Medical College, Dhaka- 1000, Bangladesh. sufihannan@yahoo.com

AIM: To evaluate the performance of commercially available immunochromatographic (ICT) and immunoblot tests covering the current infection marker CIM and conventional ELISA for the diagnosis of H pylori infection in adult dyspeptic patients. METHODS: Consecutive non-treated dyspeptic patients undergoing diagnostic endoscopy were tested for H pylori infection by culture, rapid urease test, and histology of gastric biopsy specimens. Serum from 61 H pylori infected and 21 non-infected patients were tested for anti-H pylori IgG antibodies by commercial ELISA (AccuBindTM ELISA, Monobind, USA), ICT (AssureR H pylori Rapid Test, Genelabs Diagnostics, Singapore), and immunoblot (Helico Blot 2.1, Genelabs Diagnostics, Singapore) assays. ICT and immunoblot kits cover CIM among other parameters and their performance with and without CIM was evaluated separately. RESULTS: Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and accuracy of ELISA were 96.7%, 42.8%, 83.1%, 81.8%, and 82.9%, of ICT were 90.1%, 80.9%, 93.2%, 73.9%, and 87.8%, of ICT with CIM were 88.5%, 90.4%, 96.4%, 73.0%, and 89.0%, of immunoblot were 98.3%, 80.9%, 93.7%, 94.4%, and 93.9%, and of immunoblot with CIM were 98.3%, 90.4%, 96.7%, 95.0%, and 96.3%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Immunoblot with CIM had the best performance. ICT with CIM was found to be more specific and accurate than the conventional ELISA and may be useful for non-invasive diagnosis of H pylori infection.
 


The WJG Press, Room 1066, Yishou Garden ,
No. 58, North Langxinzhuang Road,
PO Box 2345, Beijing 100023, China
Fax: +86-10-85381893
Telephone: +86-10-85381892
E-mail: wjg@wjgnet.com
http: // www.wjgnet.com
Copyright 2004-2007 by The WJG Press and Beijing Baishideng BioMed Technology Co., Ltd.