Research Report
Copyright ©2014 Baishideng Publishing Group Co., Limited. All rights reserved.
World J Gastroenterol. Apr 21, 2014; 20(15): 4433-4439
Published online Apr 21, 2014. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i15.4433
Anatomic resection of liver segments 6-8 for hepatocellular carcinoma
Chang-Ku Jia, Jie Weng, You-Ke Chen, Yu Fu
Chang-Ku Jia, Jie Weng, You-Ke Chen, Yu Fu, Department of Hepatobiliary Pancreatic Surgery, the Affiliated Hospital of Hainan Medical College, Haikou 570102, Hainan Province, China
Author contributions: Jia CK, as a chief surgeon, performed the operation; Jia CK and Weng J designed the study; Weng J wrote the manuscript; Chen YK and Fu Y revised the manuscript.
Supported by A grant from the Science and Technology Projects of Education Department of Hainan Province, China, No. Hjkj2012-25
Correspondence to: Chang-Ku Jia, MD, Department of Hepatobiliary Pancreatic Surgery, the Affiliated Hospital of Hainan Medical University, 31 Longhua Road, Haikou 570102, Hainan Province, China. jiachk@126.com
Telephone: +86-898-66789287 Fax: +86-898-66528336
Received: November 3, 2013
Revised: December 25, 2013
Accepted: February 20, 2014
Published online: April 21, 2014
Abstract

AIM: To report the devised anatomic liver resection of segments 6, 7 and 8 to improve the resection rate for patients with right liver tumors.

METHODS: We performed anatomic liver resection of segments 6, 7 and 8 to guarantee the maximum preservation of the remaining normal liver tissue. Segment 5 was determined by two steps of Glissonean pedicle occlusion. And a “┏┛” shaped broken resection line was marked upon the diaphragmatic surface of the liver. Selective right hemihepatic inflow occlusion was used to reduce blood loss during parenchymal transection between segments 6 and 5 and between segments 8 and 5. If needed, total hepatic Glissonean pedicle occlusion was used during parenchymal transection between segment 8 and the left liver.

RESULTS: Compared to right hemihepatectomy, the percentage of future liver remnant volume was increased by an average of 13.9% if resection of segments 6, 7 and 8 was performed. Resection of segments 6, 7 and 8 was completed uneventfully. After hepatectomy, the inflow and outflow of segment 5 were maintained. There was no perioperative mortality, postoperative abdominal bleeding or bile leakage in this group. Alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) returned to the normal range within 2 mo after the operation in all the patients. One patient died 383 d postoperatively due to obstructive suppurative cholangitis. One patient suffered from severe liver dysfunction shortly after surgery and had intrahepatic recurrence 4 mo postoperatively. Postoperative lung metastasis was found in one patient. No tumor recurrence was found in the other patients and the parameters including liver function and AFP level were in the normal range.

CONCLUSION: Anatomic liver resection of segments 6, 7 and 8 can be a conventional operation to improve the overall resection rate for hepatocellular carcinoma.

Keywords: Anatomic hepatectomy, Hepatocellular carcinoma, Selective occlusion, Alpha-fetoprotein, Liver tumor

Core tip: Hepatic resection is the only curative treatment for patients with huge and multifocal tumors. However, patients with huge or multifocal tumors in the right liver and with a small volume of left liver cannot undergo right hemihepatectomy because of the possibility of postoperative liver failure, thus leading to a low overall resection rate for hepatocellular carcinoma. To increase the number of resectable patients and improve the overall resection rate, we devised anatomic liver resection of segments 6, 7 and 8 in patients with right liver tumors.