|
Jae-Il
Kim, Young-Jin Park, Ki-Hong Kim, Ji-Il Kim, Byung-Joo Song, Meung-Soo
Lee, Chul-Num Kim, Seok-Hyo Chang, Department of Surgery, Ilsan Paik
Hospital, Inje University College of Medicine. 2240, Daehwa-dong, Ilsan-gu,
Koyang shi, Kyunggi-do 412-270, Korea
Supported by the grants from the Korea Research Foundation, No.
2001-003-F00117
Correspondence to: Dr. Young-Jin Park, Department of Surgery, Ilsan Paik
Hospital, Inje University College of Medicine, 2240, Daehwa-dong, Ilsan-gu,
Koyang shi, Kyunggi-do 412-270, Korea. yjpark@ilsanpaik.ac.kr
Telephone: +82-31-9107307
Fax: +82-31- 9107319
Received: 2002-12-07 Accepted:
2002-12-24
Abstract
AIM: To determine the association of hOGG1 (8-oxoguanine glycosylase I,
OGG1) polymorphism of Ser326Cys substitution with colon cancer risk and
possible interaction with known environmental risk factors.
METHODS:
A case-control study with 125 colon cancer cases and 247 controls was
conducted.
RESULTS:
There was no major difference in Ser326Cys genotype distribution between
cases and controls. The meat intake tended to increase the odds ratio for
colon cancer with an OR of 1.72 (95 % confidence interval; CI=1.12-2.76).
Such tendency was more prominent in Cys/Cys carriers (OR=4.31, 95 %
CI=1.64-11.48), but meat intake was not a significant risk factor for
colon cancer in Ser/Ser or Ser/Cys carriers. The OR for colon cancer was
elevated with marginal significance in smokers who were Cys/Cys carriers
(OR=2.75, 95 % CI=1.07-7.53) but not in Ser/Ser or Ser/Cys carriers.
CONCLUSION:
These results suggest that the hOGG1 Ser326Cys polymorphism is probably
not a major contributor to individual colon cancer susceptibility overall,
but the Cys/Cys genotype may alter the impact of some environmental
factors on colon cancer development.
Kim
JI, Park YJ, Kim KH, Kim JI, Song BJ, Lee MS, Kim CN, Chang SH. hOGG1
Ser326Cys polymorphism modifies the significance of the environmental risk
factor for colon cancer. World J Gastroenterol
2003; 9(5): 956-960
http://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/9/956.asp
INTRODUCTION
Reactive oxygen species are formed continuously in living cells through
both endogenous and exogenous processes. The reaction of reactive oxygen
species results in various forms of both cellular and DNA damage[1].
Oxidative damage to DNA is thought to cause mutations, which in turn can
activate oncogenes or inactivate tumor suppressor genes and may finally
lead to carcinogenesis[2-4]. 7,8-Dihydro-8-oxoguanine (8oxoG)
is one of the most important lesions produced in DNA by oxygen radical
forming agents. Due to its mispairing with deoxyadenosine, it causes
mutagenic transversion of G:C to T:A in vitro and in vivo[5,6].
The hOGG1 gene encodes a DNA glycosylase/AP-lyase that catalyzes the
removal of 8oxoG adducts as part of the base excision repair pathway. The
hOGG1 gene is expressed as multiple alternatively-spliced isoforms with
only the 1a-form
containing a nuclear localization signal[7,8]. Previous studies
have revealed the presence of several polymorphisms at the hOGG1 locus. A
C/G polymorphism at position of 1245 in the 1a-specific exon 7 of the
hOGG1 gene results in an amino acid substitution from serine to cysteine
in codon 326[9]. Although no difference in catalytic activity
was observed between Ser326 and Cys326 variants in some studies[10,11],
the hOGG1 protein encoded by the Ser326 allele exhibited substantially
higher activities than the Cys326 variants in an in vitro Escherichia coli
complementation activities assay[9].
Several
studies have suggested that Cys326 type allele is associated with
increased risk for lung[12], esophageal[13] and a
subset of stomach cancer[14]. The possible causal relationship
between oxygen free radicals and cancer development has been reported
mainly in organs under a high burden of oxygen free radicals, including
the lung and oro-laryngeal cancer associated with smoking history. Among
the smokers, the Cys/Cys carriers who are supposed to have decreased
capability in coping with the oxidative DNA damage tended to be more
susceptible to lung cancer than the Ser/Ser or Ser/Cys carriers. The colon
may be continuously exposed to the attack of oxygen free radicals. The
relatively high concentrations of iron in feces, together with the ability
of bile pigments to act as iron chelators that support Fenton chemistry,
may very well permit efficient hydroxyl radical (-OH) generation from
superoxide and hydrogen peroxide produced by bacterial metabolism[15].
The abundant free radical generation in colon supports the free radical
related colon carcinogenesis.
We
previously demonstrated that the impact of genetic defect on
carcinogenesis is modulated by an environmental risk factor in hereditary
nonpolyposis colorectal cancer patients[16]. In addition, we
tried to delineate the relationship between hOGG1 enzyme activity and the
allele type harbored in Ser326Cys polymorphism in vivo[17].
However, any clear conclusion was not made despite of possible relevance.
The available information makes it plausible to hypothesize that the
Ser326Cys polymorphism may alter colon cancer risk, particularly in
association with the environmental risk factors. We will conduct a case
control study to examine the hypothesis.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Study populations and sample processing
Case subjects consisted of 125 patients operated with primary colorectal
cancer. All the patients agreed to participate in this study and
consented. Community-based controls consisted of subjects who were visited
the health-screening center of Ilsan-Paik hospital. At this center,
screenings of common cancers as well as evaluation on the general status
of health were performed. All control subjects were recruited after an
initial verbal screening to determine whether they had no previous
diagnosis of cancer, and none of the controls recruited into this study
were diagnosed with any form of cancer after screening. The eligible pool
of control subjects was restricted to those individuals of the same age (±5 years) and sex as case subjects. The controls pair-matched
into a 2 to 1 ratio in terms of those cases studied. Ninety-five percent
of the control subjects (n=247) consented. A trained interviewer conducted
in-person interviews. Information was collected on life-long smoking,
alcohol consumption, diet habits, physical activity and family history of
colorectal cancer.
Genotypic assays
The genotypes of hOGG1 alleles were determined by a polymerase chain
reaction - restriction endonuclease length polymorphism (PCR-RELP)
analysis. Briefly, a 251 bp fragment was amplified by PCR in a 25 mL reaction volume that contained 50 ng of
genomic DNA, 10 mmol/L Tris-HCl, 50 mmol/L KCl, 1 mmol/L MgCl2,
0.2 mmol/L of each dNTP, 10 pmol of the hOGG1 sense (hOGG1F; 5'-
AGTGGATTCTCATTGCCTTCG-3', corresponding to nucleotide 8 919 through 8 939
of hOGG1 intron 6 DNA sequences; Genbank accession #HSA131341) and
antisense (hOGG1R; 5'-GGTGCTTGGGGAATTTCTTT-3', corresponding to nucleotide
9 150 through 9 169 of hOGG1 exon 7 sequences) primers and 2 units of Taq
DNA polymerase. Cycling conditions were as follows: initial denaturation
at 94 ℃
for 5 min following 30 cycles of denaturation at 94 ℃
for 30 sec, annealing at 57 ℃
for 30 and elongation at 72 ℃
for 40. Ten mL of each PCR sample was digested with 2 units
of Fsp4HI (Bioneer, Taejeon, Korea) at 37 ℃
for 12 h and resolved on 30 g/L agarose gels to detect differences in RFLP
patterns.
Statistical analysis
The association between the hOGG1 polymorphism and colorectal cancer risk
was estimated by the odds ratio (OR), using the unconditional logistic
regression model. We calculated not only crude ORs, but also values
adjusted for age, sex, drinking habits, smoking and diet habits to control
the effect of potential confounding environmental factors. Because the
Ser/Ser genotype was thought to have the highest effective enzymatic
activity, we used this genotype as reference for colorectal cancer risk.
Thus, the ORs for the Ser/Cys and Cys/Cys types relative to the Ser/Ser
were calculated. The ORs for the Cys/Cys type versus other types combined
were also calculated because only the Cys/Cys type could potentially
influence the individual repair activity. Statistical differences of the
categorical comparison and the probability of the Hardy-Weinberg
equilibrium were tested using x2 test.
RESULTS
The mean age of the case and control groups were 57.2 and 56.1 years,
respectively, and the case and control groups consisted of 36.5 % and 37.2
% females, respectively. There were no significant statistical differences
in age and gender between the case and control groups.
Three
banding patterns were observed depending on the genotypes; a single 251 bp
band corresponding to the Ser326/Ser326 genotype, a 251, 153 and 98 bp
bands that corresponded to the Ser326/Cys326 genotype, and 153 and 98 bp
bands corresponding to the 326Cys/Cys326 genotype (Figure 1A). The
specificity of the amplification products was verified by sequencing
(Figure 1B).
Figure
1
(PDF) A: The representative
PCR-RFLP analysis of hOGG1 Ser326Cys polymorphism. Lane 1, 5, undigested
PCR-amplified product observed in homozygous Ser326 carriers; Lane 2,
Fsp4HI-digested PCR product from subject with heterozygous hOGG1 genotype;
Lane 3, 4, Fsp4HI-digested PCR product from subject with homozygous Cys326
genotype. B: DNA sequence histogram revealing the indicated sequence
changes (underlined). In the 2nd histogram, both the cytosine (blue line)
and guanine (black line) are observed in the codon 326 site (marked as N),
indicating the heterozygous genotype.
The allelic frequency was not significantly different between cases
and controls, slightly more homozygous Cys326 alleles were found in the
case group than that in the controls (Table 1). The prevalence of the
hOGG1 Ser/Cys polymorphism followed theHardy-Weinberg equilibrium.
Table
1 Odds ratios for colon
cancer according to the genotypes of hOGG1 Ser326Cys polymorphism
| |
Number
(%) |
OR
(95% CI) |
P
for trend |
| |
Controls |
Cases |
|
|
| Ser
/ Ser |
52
(21.1) |
24
(19.2) |
1.00 |
|
| Ser
/ Cys |
131
(53.0) |
66
(52.8) |
1.09
(0.60-2.00) |
P=0.871 |
| Cys
/ Cys |
64
(25.9) |
35
(28.0) |
1.18
(0.60-2.35) |
|
| Total |
247
(100) |
125
(100) |
|
|
To examine the relationship between the hOGG1 genotype and colon cancer
risk in the presence of selected environmental risk factors, study
subjects were stratified by hOGG1 genotype and several known colon cancer
risk factors. Table 2 represented the frequency distribution of the hOGG1
genotype stratified with the risk factors and ORs with a 95 % confidence
interval (95 % CI) for colon cancer cases compared with controls. None of
the risk factors analyzed in the present study significantly elevated the
ORs for colon cancer in the total number of subjects studied. Only
frequent meat intake increased the OR with marginal statistical
significance.
Table
2 ORs for colon cancer
according to individual habits and familial history of colon cancer with
reference to the hOGG1 Ser326Cys polymorphism
|
Total |
hOGG1
Ser326Cys polymorphi
sm |
|
Ca/Co |
OR |
95%
CI |
Ser/Ser
+ ser/Cys |
Cys/Cys |
|
Ca/Co |
OR |
95%CI |
Ca/Co |
OR |
95%CI |
| Smoking |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| No |
44/106 |
1.00 |
- |
35/75 |
1.00 |
- |
9/31 |
1.00 |
- |
| Yes |
81/141 |
1.53 |
0.94-2.52 |
55/108 |
1.08 |
0.62-1.84 |
26/33 |
2.75 |
1.07-7.53 |
| Drinking |
| <2times/wk |
73/161 |
1.00 |
- |
53/122 |
1.00 |
- |
20/39 |
1.00 |
- |
| >2times/wk |
52/86 |
1.37 |
0.87-2.32 |
37/61 |
1.49 |
0.87-2.77 |
15/25 |
1.21 |
0.49-3.02 |
| Meat |
| <2time/week |
66/159 |
1.00 |
- |
52/112 |
|
- |
14/47 |
1.00 |
- |
| >2time/week |
59/88 |
1.72 |
1.12-2.76 |
38/71 |
1.27 |
0.73-2.13 |
21/17 |
4.31 |
1.64-11.48 |
| Vegetable
intake |
| Low |
50/89 |
1.00 |
- |
36/70 |
1.00 |
- |
14/19 |
1.00 |
- |
| High |
75/158 |
0.80 |
0.49-1.31 |
54/113 |
0.90 |
0.46-1.67 |
21/45 |
1.55 |
0.50-4.19 |
| Soybean
product |
| <
3/wk |
55/115 |
1.00 |
37/87 |
1.00 |
|
- |
18/28 |
1.00 |
- |
| >
3/wk |
70/132 |
1.11 |
0.70-1.75 |
53/96 |
1.30 |
0.76-2.23 |
17/36 |
0.73 |
0.30-1.82 |
| Activity |
| <
4 hs/wk |
61/104 |
1.00 |
- |
43/75 |
|
- |
18/29 |
1.00 |
- |
| >
4hs/wk |
64/143 |
0.76 |
0.48-1.20 |
47/108 |
0.76 |
0.44-1.30 |
17/35 |
0.78 |
0.32-1.94 |
| Familial
history of colon cancer |
| No |
84/185 |
1.00 |
- |
62/138 |
|
- |
22/47 |
1.00 |
- |
| Yes |
41/62 |
1.46 |
0.80-2.40 |
28/45 |
1.38 |
0.76-2.51 |
13/17 |
1.63 |
0.62-4.32 |
Denotes:
Ca/Co=Cases/Controls.
In the subgroup analysis with reference to the Ser326Cys
polymorphism, the smoking habit did not increase the ORs for colon cancer
in Ser/Ser or Ser/Cys carriers. In contrast, a near-significant increase
in risk was observed for smokers with the Cys/Cys genotype (OR=2.75, 95
%CI=1.07-7.53). Meat intake was associated with increased colon cancer
incidence with borderline significance among the total number of subjects
(OR=1.72, 95 % CI=1.12-2.76). The OR for colon cancer with frequent meat
intake was further increased in the Cys/Cys subgroup (OR=4.31, 95 %
CI=1.64-11.48), while the OR was not increased in Ser/Ser or Ser/Cys
carriers. Except for the meat intake factor, the intake of selected foods
including alcohol, vegetable and soybean products did not alter the ORs
for colon cancer neither in the entire group of subjects studied nor in
the Cys/Cys subgroup. No significant alteration in the OR for colon cancer
according to the extent of physical activity was observed in either
genotype carriers.
Because the
presence of colon cancer in relatives, particularly in 1st or 2nd
degree relatives, has been known to be associated with colon cancer risk
and because the genetic polymorphism could be one of the possible causes,
changing patterns of OR for colon cancer according to the hOGG1 Ser326Cys
polymorphism when there was at least one colon cancer patient within a
family were investigated. Although the risk was increased with the
presence of colon cancer within a family among the total number of
subjects studied, there was no apparent increase in the OR among subjects
with Cys/Cys genotype.
DISCUSSION
It is theoretically possible that the incidence of cancer differs
depending on the genotypes of hOGG1 Ser326Cys polymorphism. This view is
supported by the difference in DNA repairing capability depending on the
allele type[9] and increase of the incidence of cancer in
certain organs in Cys326 allele carriers[12,13,18].
Colon
is the most susceptible organ for cancer development in hereditary non-polyposis
colorectal cancer (HNPCC), where the DNA mismatch repair activity is
defective[19]. As the role of defects in DNA mismatches repair
process in colon carcinogenesis is very clear, attention has also recently
focused on the possible role of alternative DNA repair pathways such as
base excision repair in colon cancer formation.
In
the present investigation, however, the hOGG1 Ser326Sys polymorphism did
not alter the overall odds ratios for colon cancers despite of the
theoretical relevancies. Subgroup analysis revealed an increased tendency
of ORs with smoking habit or frequent meat intaking in Cys/Cys carriers
although the statistical significance of the former factor is marginal.
The
intake of meat and animal fat was almost consistently associated with the
increased risk of large-bowel cancer in the previous studies[20-22].
It was suggested that the abundant fecal iron after red meat intake,
together with the ability of bile pigments to act as iron chelators,
supports the superoxide-driven Fenton reaction[15]. Meanwhile,
excessive fat ingestion increases the concentrations of bile acids in the
colon. The increased fatty acids and secondary bile acids in the colonic
lumen, which acts as cytotoxic surfactants, can damage colonic epithelial
cells and thus induce a compensatory hyperproliferation of crypt cells[23].
In addition, the high intake of polyunsaturated fatty acid induces
peroxidative reaction with plasma low-density lipoproteins, which in turn
generate free radicals. Meat is a major source of dietary animal fat.
Thus, the question is still unresolved whether the association of meat
with colorectal cancer seen in some epidermiologic investigations reflects
the effect of fat, or meat in general, or just particular types of meat.
One prospective study showed that red meat, but not the chicken or fish
could be an independent risk factor for colon cancer[24]. The
result of the present investigation together with a literature review
consists with the suggestion that oxidative damage after meat intake may
play a role in colon carcinogenesis and that the role may be more
pronounced in Cys/Cys carriers, who have a lower activity in terms of
repair of DNA.
Some
discussion is required on the credibility of the answer concerning the
meat intake habit. The dietary environment has been rapidly changing in
Korea in accordance with economic development. Meat consumption per capita
has increased more than 3 times during the past 3 decades[25].
A possible problem under this circumstance is that the answers on the
questionnaire might be more influenced by recent dietary habits rather
than lifelong ones, although we tried to reduce such problems to a minimum
during the interview.
Among
the various lifestyle factors, tobacco smoking might provide the strongest
oxygen radical generating environment. An array of studies demonstrated
the increased oxidative DNA damage in smokers compared to non-smokers[26,27].
The carcinogenic role of tobacco in association with the oxygen free
radical seems clear in airway tract tissues. Recent studies showed that an
increased risk of squamous type lung cancer, orolaryngeal cancer in
smokers, was particularly found in homozygous Cys 326 gene carriers. In
general, the biologic role of tobacco smoke as an etiology of cancer in
the gastrointestinal tract might be less prominent than that in the airway
tract. Tobacco smoking history is often inconsistent with the incidence of
colorectal cancers although it shows a near consistent positive
relationship with the presence of colorectal adenomas[28,29].
The previous studies, which investigated the effect of smoking in gastric
cancer development in connection with the Ser326Cys polymorphism, showed
only a weak association[14]. In the present study, the OR for
colon cancer among smokers tended to be higher in Cys/Cys carriers than
that in Ser/Ser and Ser/Cys carriers, the interaction being of borderline
statistical significance. The result of present findings suggested that
the oxygen free radical generated from tobacco smoke might be involved in
colon carcinogenesis although the role is probably limited.
The role of
oxidative DNA damage in alcohol-related carcinogenesis is still
controversial. Alcohol consumption was associated with increased DNA
damage or induction of 8oxoG in some studies[30,31] in
contrast, but not in others[32,33]. The present study showed
that alcohol intake did not increase the risk of colon cancer even in Cys/Cys
carriers. It suggested that the role of alcohol consumption in colon
cancer formation, particularly in association with the 8oxoG adduct
induction, was limited. The other factors including vegetable or soybean
product intake, physical exercise and family history of colon cancer did
not increase OR for colon cancer in the total number of subjects studied
as well as in Cys/Cys carriers. Thus, it was difficult to interpret
whether these factors play a role during colon carcinogeneis, particularly
in interaction with the hOGG1 Ser326Cys polymorphism.
In
summary, the hOGG1 Ser/Cys polymorphism does not significantly alter the
overall risk of colon cancer. The Cys type allele, however, may exert an
impact on colon carcinogenesis through an interaction with certain
environmental factors such as smoking or meat consumption. There are lines
of complex biologic factors involved in colon carcinogenesis. The present
study suggests the possibility that an inter-individual difference in DNA
repair capacity can be one such factor, however, the influence of such a
role is believed to be limited. Further studies with a large number of
subjects are warranted to better assess the role of hOGG1 polymorphism in
colon carcinogenesis.
REFERENCES
1
Poulsen HE, Prieme H, Loft S. Role of oxidative damage in cancer
initiation and promotion. Eur J Cancer Prev 1998; 7: 9-16
2
Fearon ER. Human cancer syndrome: clues to the origin and nature of
cancer. Science 1997; 278: 1043-1050
3
Loft S, Deng XS, Tuo J, Wellejus A, Sorensen M, Poulsen HE.
Experimental study of oxidative DNA damage.
Free Radic Res 1998; 29: 525-539
4
Marnett LJ. Oxyradicals and DNA damages. Carcinogenesis 2000; 21:
361-370
5
Shibutani S, Takeshita N, Grollman AP. Insertion of specific bases
during DNA synthesis past the oxidation-damaged base
8-oxodG. Nature 1991; 349: 431-434
6
Michaels ML, Miller JH. The GO system protects organisms from the
mutagenic effect of the spontaneous lesion
8-hydroxyguanine. J Bacteriol 1992; 174:
6321-6325
7
Nishioka K, Ohtsubo T, Oda H, Fujiwara T, Kang D, Sugimachi K,
Nakappu Y. Expression and differential intracellular
localization of two major forms of human
8-oxoguanine DNA glycosylase encoded by alternatively spliced OGG1 mRNAs.
Mol Biol Cell 1999; 10: 1637-1652
8
Shinmura K, Kohno T, Teckeuchi-Sasaki M, Maeda M, Segawa T, Kamo T,
Sugimura H, Yokota J. Expression of the OGG1
type 1a(nuclear form) protein in cancerous and
non-cancerous human cells. Int J Oncol 2000; 16: 701-707
9
Kohno T, Shinmura K, Tosaka M, Tani M, Kim SR, Sugimura H, Nohmi T,
Kasai H, Yokota J. Genetic polymorphisms
and alternative splicing on the hOGG1 gene, that
is involved in the repair of 8-hydroxyguanine in damaged DNA.
Oncogene 1998; 16: 3219-3225
10
Dherin C, Radicella JP, Dizdaroglu M, Boiteux S. Excision of
oxidatively damaged DNA base by the human alpha-hOGG1
protein and polymorphic alpha-hOGG1(Ser326Cys)
which is frequently found in human populations. Nucl Acids Res
1999; 27: 4001-4007
11
Janssen K, Schlink K, Gotte W, Hipper B, Kaina B, Oesch F. DNA
repair activity of 8-oxoguanine DNA glycosylase 1 in
human lymphocytes is not dependent on genetic
polymorphism Ser326/Cys326. Mutat
Res 2001; 486: 207-216
12
Sugimura H, Kohno T, Wakai K, Nagura K, Genka K, Igarashi H, Morris
BJ, Baba S, Ohno Y, Gao C, Li Z, Wang J, Takezaki
T, Tajima K, Varga T, Sawaguchi T, Lum JK,
Martinson JJ, Tsugane S, Iwamasa T, Shinmura K, Yokota J. hOGG1
Ser326Cys polymorphism and lung cancer
susceptibility. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers
Prev 1999; 8: 669-674
13
Xing DY, Tan W, Song N, Lin DY. Ser326Cys polymorphism in hOGG1
gene and risk of esophageal cancer in a Chinese
population. Int J Cancer 2001; 95: 140-143
14
Takezaki T, Gao CM, Wo JZ, Li ZU, Wang JD, Ding JH, Liu YT, Hu X,
Xu TL, Tajima K, Sugimura H. hOGG1
Ser326Cys polymorphism and modification by
environmental factors of stomach cancer risk in Chinese. Int J
Cancer
2002; 99: 624-627
15
Babbs CF. Free radicals and the etiology of colon cancer. Free
Radic Biol Med 1990; 8: 191-200
16
Park JG, Park YJ, Wijnen JT, Vasen HF. Gene-environment interaction
in hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer
with implications for diagnosis and genetic
testing. Int J Cancer 1999; 82: 516-519
17
Park YJ, Choi EY, Choi JY, Park JG, You HJ, Chung MH. Genetic
changes of hOGG1 and the activity of oh8Gua glycosylase
in colon cancer. Eur J Cancer 2001; 37: 340-346
18
Elahi A, Zheng Z, Park J, Eyring K, McCaffrey T, Lazarus P. The
human OGG1 DNA repair enzyme and its association
with orolaryngeal cancer risk. Carcinogenesis
2002; 23: 1229-1234
19
Fishel R, Lescoe MK, Rao MR, Copeland NG, Jenkins NA, Garber J,
Kane M, Kolodner R. The human mutator gene homolog
MSH2 and its association with hereditary
nonpolyposis colon cancer. Cell 1993; 75: 1027-1038
20
Drasar BS, Irving D. Environmental factors and cancer of the colon
and breast. Br J Cancer 1973; 27: 167-172
21
Giovannucci E, Rimm EB, Stampfer MJ, Colditz GA, Ascherio A,
Willett WC. Intake of fat, meat, and fiber in relation to
risk of colon cancer in men. Cancer Res 1994; 54:
2390-2397
22
Neugut AI, Garbowski GC, Lee WC, Murray T, Nieves JW, Forde KA,
Treat MR, Waye JD, Fenoglio-Preiser C. Dietary risk
factors for the incidence and recurrence of
colorectal adenomatous polyps. A case-control study. Ann Intern Med
1993; 118: 91-95
23
Van der Meer R, Lapre JA, Govers MJ, Kleibeuker JH. Mechanisms of
the intestinal effects of dietary fats and milk products
on colon carcinogenesis. Cancer Lett 1997; 114:
75-83
24
Willett WC, Stampfer MJ, Colditz GA, Rosner BA, Speizer FE.Relation
of meat, fat, and fiber intake to the risk of colon cancer
in a prospective study among women. N Engl J Med
1990; 323: 1664-1672
25 Korea National statistical
office. Available from: URL:http// www.nso.go.kr
26
Nakayama T, Kaneko M, Kodama M, Nagata C. Cigarette smoke induces
DNA single-strand breaks in human cells.
Nature 1985;314: 462-464
27
Asami S, Hirano T, Yamaguchi R, Tomioka Y, Itoh H, Kasai H.
Increase of a type of oxidative DNA damage,
8-hydroxyguanine, and its repair activity in
human leukocytes by cigarette smoking. Cancer Res 1996; 56: 2546-2549
28
Kune GA, Kune S, Vitetta L, Watson LF. Smoking and colorectal
cancer risk: data from the melbourne colorectal cancer
study and brief review of literature. Int J
Cancer 1992; 50: 369-372
29
Heineman EF, Zahm SH, McLaughlin JK, Vaught JB. Increased risk of
colorectal cancer among smokers: results of a
26-year follow-up of US veterans and a review.
Int J Cancer 1994; 59: 728-738
30
Nakajima M, Takeuchi T, Takeshita T, Morimoto K.
8-Hydroxydeoxyguanosine in human leukocyte DNA and daily health
practice factors: effects of individual alcohol
sensitivity. Environ Health Perspect 1996; 104: 1336-1338
31
Ye XB, Fu H, Zhu JL, Ni WM, Lu YW, Kuang XY, Yang SL, Shu BX. A
study on oxidative stress in lead-exposed workers.
J Toxicol Environ Health 1999; 57: 161-172
32
van Zeeland AA, de Groot AJ, Hall J, Donato F.
8-Hydroxydeoxyguanosine in DNA from leukocytes of healthy adults:
relationship with cigarette smoking,
environmental tobacco smoke, alcohol and coffee consumption. Mutat Res
1999; 439: 249-257
33
Lodovici M, Casalini C, Cariaggi R, Michelucci L, Dolara P. Levels
of 8- hydroxydeoxyguanosine as a marker of DNA damage
in human leukocytes. Free Radic Biol Med 2000;
28: 13-17
Edited
by Xu XQ
| |