|
Sheng
Zhang, Hua Lin, Department of Pathology, The First Affiliated
Hospital, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou 350005, Fujian Province,
China
Li
Li, Jian-Yin Lin, Department of Molecular Medicine, Fujian Medical
University, Fuzhou, 350004, Fujian Province, China
Supported
by Fujian Province Educational Bureau Science Foundation, No JA98103
and Fujian Province Health Bureau Science Foundation, No 96048
Correspondence
to: Professor Jian-Yin Lin, Department of Molecular Medicine, Fujian
Medical University, Fuzhou 350004, China.
jylin@fjmu.edu.cn
Telephone:
+86-591-3574445 Fax:
+86-591-3351345
Received:
2002-11-06 Accepted:
2002-12-22
Abstract
AIM:
The expressive balance between matrix metalloproteinase-9 (MMP-9)
and its tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase-1 (TIMP-1) plays a
critical role in maintaining the degradation and synthesis of
extracellular matrix. Loss of such balance is associated with
invasion and metastasis of tumors. This study aimed to determine the
expression of MMP-9 and TIMP-1 in gastric carcinoma, and the
association of the expressive imbalance between MMP-9 and TIMP-1
with the invasion and metastasis and prognosis of gastric carcinoma.
METHODS:
We used immunohistochemistry to determine the expressions of MMP-9,
TIMP-1 and proliferating cell nuclear antigen Ki-67 in the gastric
specimens taken from 256 patients with primary gastric carcinoma.
The patients were followed-up for up to 96 months.
RESULTS:
No association between the expression of MMP-9 and TIMP-1 and
patients sex and age, tumor size and location of gastric carcinoma
was observed. The incidence of the positive expression of MMP-9 in
cases with tumors invasion to muscularis propria and visceral
peritoneum (70.13 % and 69.09 %, respectively) was significantly
higher than that in cases with tumor invasion only to lamina propria
or submucosa (42.50 %, P=0.0162). The positive correlation between
MMP-9 expression and the depth of tumor invasion was observed
(Pearson correlation coefficient=0.2129, P=0.016). Along with the
increase of the metastatic station of lymph nodes, the incidence of
the MMP-9 expression was increased by degrees; a positive
correlation between them was observed (Pearson correlation
coefficient=0.2910, P=0.0001). There was also a significant
correlation between MMP-9 expression and the TNM stage in gastric
carcinoma (Pearson correlation coefficient=0.3027, P<0.0001). The
incidence of MMP-9 expression in stage II and III/IV (75.00 % and
76.15 %, respectively) was significantly higher than those in stage
I (46.15 %, P<0.0001). A negative correlation between TIMP-1
immunoreactivity and the depth of invasion, status of lymph node
metastasis and TNM stage was observed (Pearson correlation
coefficient =-0.1688, -0.3556 and -0.3004, P=0.023, <0.0001 and
<0.0001, respectively). Four types of co-expression of MMP-9 and
TIMP-1 were observed; i.e. MMP-9 positive but TIMP-1 negative
(n=115), both positive (n=52), both negative (n=62) and MMP-9
negative but TIMP-1 positive (n=27). The frequency of serosal
invasiveness was significant higher in patients with MMP-9 but
without TIMP-1 expression than those with other types of the
co-expression (P=0.0303). The incidence of lymph node metastasis was
highest in patients with MMP-9 but without TIMP-1 expression, and
lowest in those with TIMP-1 but without MMP-9 expression (P<0.0001). The survival rate in patients with MMP-9 but without
TIMP-1 expression was lower than that in those with TIMP-1 but
without MMP-9 expression (P=0.0014).
CONCLUSION:
Our results in gastric carcinoma demonstrated a significant positive
association of MMP-9 over-expression with proliferation of tumor
cells, the depth of invasiveness, lymph node metastasis and TNM
stage, suggesting MMP-9 can serve as a molecular marker of tumor
invasion and metastasis. We also demonstrate a significant negative
relationship of TIMP-1 expression with the depth of invasiveness and
lymph node metastasis, which provide a new idea in the tumor
biological and genetic treatment. The interaction between MMP-9 and
TIMP-1 in the processes of tumor invasion and metastasis is that
MMP-9 mainly promotes tumor invasion and metastasis and TIMP-1
inhibits functions of MMP-9. The imbalance between MMP-9 and TIMP-1
expression may suggest the occurrence of tumor invasion and
metastasis, predict poor prognosis. For patients with imbalanced
MMP-9 and TIMP-1 expression, the optimal treatment scheme needs to
be selected.
Zhang
S, Li L, Lin JY, Lin H. Imbalance between expression of matrix
metalloproteinase-9 and tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase-1 in
invasiveness and metastasis of human gastric carcinoma. World J
Gastroenterol 2003;
9(5): 899-904
http://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/9/899.asp
INTRODUCTION
The
malignant behavior of tumor cells mainly depends on the capability
of invasion and metastasis of cancer cells. After the components of
the extracellular matrix (ECM) are degraded, tumor cells invade the
surrounding tissue and the vascular or lymphatic vessels to form
metastatic colonies at distant sites. Matrix metalloproteinase-9
(MMP-9) can degrade the main components of the ECM, type IV and V
collagen and gelatin[1-6], thus, its activities are closely related
to the ability of the invasiveness and metastasis of tumor cells[7,8]. Increased expression of matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs)
renders the tumor cells capable of digesting essential tissue
barriers especially basement membranes lining the blood vessels,
thereby promoting the cells motility. By forming a 1:1 complex with
MMP-9 and inhibiting its enzymatic activity[2,9,10], tissue
inhibitor of metalloproteinase-1 (TIMP-1) plays negative role in the
invasion and metastasis of tumor cells[11]. Therefore, attentions
have been paid to the role of MMP-9 and TIMP-1 in the progress of
tumor, and it has been reported that the expression of MMP-9 and
TIMP-1 was correlated[12], but the relationship of their expressive
imbalance to the invasion and metastasis in gastric carcinoma was
rarely reported. In the present study, we study the expressive
pattern of MMP-9 and TIMP-1 in 256 patients with primary gastric
carcinoma by immunohistochemistry, as well as the relationship of
their expressive imbalance to invasion and lymph node metastasis and
prognosis of gastric carcinoma. We demonstrated that the expressive
imbalance of MMP-9 and TIMP-1 was significantly associated with the
invasion and metastasis of gastric carcinoma.
MATERIALS
AND METHODS
Materials
Two
hundred fifty-six patients who underwent a surgery for the primary
gastric carcinoma at the First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical
University, between 1991 and 1999, and had sufficient clinical
materials were selected for this study. These patients comprised 186
males and 70 females. The median age was 60 with a range from 23 to
84 years. All studied patients had not been accepted for radiation
therapy and chemotherapy before the operation. The histological
findings, lymph node metastasis and TNM stage were evaluated based
on World Health Organization Classification of Tumors[13,14].
Follow-up information was available for 167 patients.
Methods
The
specimens were fixed in formalin and embedded in paraffin wax,
sliced serial step sections of 4 mm thickness and stained by hematoxylin-eosin.
Immunohistochemistry
Paraffin
sections (4 mm thick) were immunostained with anti-mouse monoclonal
antibodies for MMP-9 (GE-213, 1:10, NeoMarkers), TIMP-1 (102D1,
1:10, NeoMarkers) and Ki-67 (MB67, Ready, NeoMarkers) by the
peroxidase-conjugated streptavidin complex method. Sections were
deparaffinized and heated in a microwave oven for 10 min to retrieve
the antigens. They were immersed in 3 % hydrogen peroxide in 100 %
methanol for 10 min to block the endogenous peroxidase activity.
After incubated in normal horse serum for 20 min, the tissue
sections were incubated with the primary antibodies for 120 min at
room temperature. The sections were incubated with biotinylated
rabbit anti-mouse immunoglobulins G for 20 min and then treated with
peroxidase-conjugated streptavidin for 20 min. The sections were
immersed into DAB solution. The slides were counterstained with
haematoxylin solution, dehydrated and mounted. Between steps, the
slides were washed three times with phosphate buffered saline (PBS).
As a negative control, PBS was used instead of the primary antibody.
Two
independent observers without knowledge of the clinical outcomes
evaluated the degree of immunohistochemical staining. All sections
for which the two observers disagreed were re-evaluated until there
was a complete agreement on the classification.
Immunohistochemical
analyses of MMP-9, TIMP-1 and Ki-67 labeling index
Figures
1 and 2 show a positive expression of MMP-9 and TIMP-1,
respectively. They were expressed within the cell membrane and/or
cytoplasm. The intensity of staining in cell membrane and cytoplasm
and the percentage of immunoreactive cells to total tumor cells were
evaluated. The intensity of staining was graded as 0, when staining
not greater than negative control, 1, for light staining, and 2, for
heavy staining. Immunoreactivity was scored according to the
percentage of immunoreactive cells over total tumor cells counted as
0, if <5 % cells were stained; 1 if 5-25 % cells were
immunoreactive, 2 if 26-50 % cells were immunoreactive and 3 if
>50 % cells were immunoreactive. The expression of MMP-9 and
TIMP-1 was finally defined according to the score obtained from the
grade of intensity multiplied by the score of cell immunoreactivity,
i.e. negative (-, score 0-1), positive (+, score 2-3), and strong
positive (++, score 4 or above).
The
positive expression of Ki-67 staining was in the nuclei of the
carcinoma cells. Ki-67 labeling index was defined as the ratio of
immunoreactive cells over 1 000 tumor cells counted labeling.
Statistical
analysis
The x2 analysis was used for univariable categorical analysis. The
relationship of the expressive imbalance between MMP-9 and TIMP-1 to
the postoperative survival was tested for prognostic significance in
gastric carcinoma specific survival using Kaplan-Meier survival
curves and the log-rank test. All statistical analysis was performed
using the SPSS 6.0 statistical software program. A value of P<0.05 was considered statistically significant.
RESULTS
Relationship
between MMP-9 expression and the clinical pathological parameters of
gastric carcinoma
MMP-9
was mainly expressed within the cytoplasm and cytoplasmic membranes
of the gastric carcinoma cells (Figure 1). Among 256 primary gastric
carcinomas, the incidence of a positive expression of MMP-9 in
carcinoma cells was 65.23 % (167/256), with the incidence of strong
immunoreactivity of 13.67 % (35/256). No significant correlations
between the expression of MMP-9 and sex, age, location and size of
tumors were observed. As shown in Table 1, the incidence of the
positive expression of MMP-9 in cases whose tumors invaded to
muscularis propria and visceral peritoneum (70.13 % and 69.09 %,
respectively) were significantly higher than those whose tumors only
invaded to lamina propria or submucosa (42.50 %, P=0.0162). A
significant correlation between MMP-9 expression and the depth of
tumor invasion was observed (Pearson correlation coefficient=0.2129,
P=0.016). Along with the increase of the metastatic station of lymph
nodes, the incidence of the MMP-9 expression was increased by
degrees; a positive correlation between them was observed (Pearson
correlation coefficient=0.2910, P=0.0001). We also demonstrated a
significant correlation between MMP-9 expression and the TNM stage
of gastric carcinoma (Pearson correlation coefficient=0.3027, P<0.0001), the incidence of MMP-9 expression was significantly
higher in stage II and III/IV (75.00 % and 76.15 %, respectively)
than in stage I (46.15 %, P<0.0001, Table 1).
Relationship
between TIMP-1 expression and the clinical pathological parameter in
gastric carcinoma
A
total of 79 (30.89 %) patients had positive immunohistochemical
staining for TIMP-1 in the cytoplasm and cytoplasmic membrane of the
gastric carcinoma cells, with the strong positive staining only five
(1.95 %) cases (Figure 2). No statistical correlation between TIMP-1
immunoreactivity and sex, age, location and tumor size was observed.
There were significant negative correlations between TIMP-1
immunoreactivity and the depth of invasion, status of lymph node
metastasis and TNM stage (Pearson correlation coefficient =-0.1688,
-0.3556 and -0.3004,
P=0.023, <0.0001 and <0.0001,
respectively, Table 1).
Table
1 MMP-9 (matrix
metalloproteinase-9) and TIMP-1 (tissue inhibitor of
metalloproteinase-1) expression and clinicopathological
characteristics of gastric carcinoma
|
|
Expressing
levels of MMP-9 |
P
value |
Expressing
levels of TIMP-1 |
P
value |
|
n |
- |
+ |
++ |
Positive
rate (%) |
|
- |
+ |
Positive
rate (%) |
|
| (1)
Sex |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Male |
186 |
61 |
100 |
25 |
67.20 |
>0.05 |
127 |
59 |
31.72 |
>0.05 |
| Female |
70 |
28 |
32 |
10 |
60.00 |
|
50 |
20 |
28.57 |
|
| (2)
Age |
|
|
|
|
|
|
57.28 |
58.64 |
|
|
| Mean |
|
55.00 |
58.33 |
61.36 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ± |
|
± |
± |
± |
|
>0.05 |
± |
± |
|
>0.05 |
| SD |
|
12.19 |
11.31 |
8.48 |
|
|
12.19 |
10.22 |
|
|
| (3)
Location |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Cardia |
63 |
14 |
36 |
13 |
77.78 |
>0.05 |
39 |
24 |
38.10 |
>0.05 |
| Corpus |
33 |
10 |
18 |
5 |
69.70 |
|
23 |
10 |
30.30 |
|
| Antrum |
140 |
55 |
71 |
14 |
60.71 |
|
101 |
39 |
27.8
6 |
|
| Others |
20 |
10 |
7 |
3 |
50.00 |
|
14 |
6 |
30.00 |
|
| (4)
Tumor size(cm) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| <5 |
124 |
52 |
59 |
13 |
58.0
6 |
>0.05 |
80 |
44 |
34.38 |
>0.05 |
| ≥5 |
132 |
37 |
73 |
22 |
71.69 |
|
97 |
35 |
26.51 |
|
| (5)
Histological type |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Well-moderately |
109 |
24 |
61 |
24 |
77.98 |
>0.05 |
63 |
46 |
42.20 |
>0.0
5 |
| differentiated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Poorly
differentiated |
98 |
38 |
53 |
7 |
61.22 |
|
77 |
21 |
21.43 |
|
| Undifferentiated |
18 |
13 |
4 |
1 |
27.78 |
|
14 |
4 |
22.22 |
|
| Mucinous |
31 |
14 |
14 |
3 |
54.84 |
|
23 |
8 |
25.8
1 |
|
| (6)
Depth of invasion |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Lamina
propria |
40 |
23 |
15 |
2 |
42.50 |
<0.05 |
23 |
17 |
42.50 |
<0.05 |
| or
submucosa |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Muscularis
propria |
77 |
23 |
54 |
10 |
70.13 |
|
48 |
29 |
37.66 |
|
| Visceral
peritoneum |
139 |
43 |
73 |
23 |
69.06 |
|
106 |
33 |
23.74 |
|
| (7)Lymph
node metastasis
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Negative |
98 |
51 |
40 |
7 |
47.96 |
<0.01 |
47 |
51 |
52.04 |
<0.01 |
| N1 |
130 |
34 |
73 |
23 |
73.85 |
|
103 |
27 |
20.77 |
|
| N2 |
28 |
4 |
19 |
5 |
85.71 |
|
27 |
1 |
3.57 |
|
| (8)
TNM stage |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| I |
91 |
49 |
36 |
6 |
46.15 |
<0.01 |
46 |
45 |
49.45 |
<0.01 |
| II |
56 |
14 |
35 |
7 |
75.00 |
|
40 |
16 |
28.57 |
|
| III-IV |
109 |
26 |
61 |
22 |
76.15 |
|
91 |
18 |
16.51 |
|
| (9)Ki-67labeling
index |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Mean |
|
669.83 |
720.09 |
751.77 |
|
|
716.95 |
684.53 |
|
|
| ± |
|
± |
± |
± |
<0.01 |
|
± |
± |
|
>0.05 |
| SD |
|
129.48 |
126.64 |
120.81 |
|
|
119.67 |
122.34 |
|
|
SD:
Standard deviation.
Table
2 Association between
the expression of MMP-9 (matrix metalloproteinase-9) and TIMP-1
(tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase-1) and invasion and
metastasis of gastric carcinoma
| MMP-9
expression |
TIPM-1
expression |
n |
Penetrating
visceral peritoneum |
Lymph
node metastasis |
| n |
Ratio(%) |
n |
Ratio(%) |
| + |
- |
115 |
74 |
64.35 |
97 |
84.35 |
|
+ |
52 |
22 |
42.31a |
23 |
44.23ab |
| - |
- |
62 |
32 |
51.61a |
33 |
53.32ab |
|
+ |
27 |
12 |
44.44a |
5 |
15.52a |
aP<0.05
vs MMP-9(+)TIMP-1(-); bP<0.05 vs
MMP-9(-)TIMP-1(+).
Figure
1
MMP-9 (matrix
metalloproteinase-9) strongly positive staining. Membrane or
cytoplasm of gastric cancer cells was stained brown. (SP method
400).
Figure
2 TIMP-1 (tissue
inhibitor of metalloproteinase-1) strongly positive staining.
Membrane or cytoplasm of gastric cancer cells was stained brown. (SP
method. 400).
Relationship
between MMP-9 and TIMP-1 expression and Ki-67 labeling index
As
shown in Table 1, the higher the expression of MMP-9 in gastric
carcinoma, the higher the Ki-67 labeling indexes in tumor cells
(F=6.7013, P=0.0015). There was no significant difference in Ki-67
labeling index between the positive group and negative group of
TIMP-1 expression in gastric carcinoma (F=3.4474, P>0.05).
Relationship
of the expressive imbalance between MMP-9 and TIMP-1 to the
invasiveness and metastasis of gastric carcinoma
According
to the expression of MMP-9 and TIMP-1 in gastric carcinoma tissues,
four patterns of co-expression were observed: 1, MMP-9 positive but
TIMP-1 negative, or MMP-9 expression greater than TIMP-1 expression,
n=115 (44.92 %); 2, MMP-9 and TIMP-1 both positive, n=52 (20.13 %);
3, MMP-9 and TIMP-1 both negative, n=62(24.22 %); 4, MMP-9 negative
but TIMP-1 positive, or TIMP-1 expression greater than MMP-9
expression, n=27 (10.55 %). Whereas patterns 2 and 3 of the
co-expression of MMP-9 and TIMP-1 were defined as balanced, the
co-expression patterns in 1 and 4 were defined as imbalanced. The
frequency of the serosa invasiveness in patients with the
co-expression pattern 1 was significant higher than those with other
patterns (P=0.0303). Similarly, the incidence of lymph node
metastasis was highest in patients with the co-expression pattern 1
and lowest in those with the pattern 4 (P<0.0001, Table 2).
Relationship
of the expression of MMP-9 and TIMP-1 to the postoperative survival
of patients with gastric carcinoma
Follow-up
(6-97 months) information was available for 167 patients with
gastric carcinoma. The postoperative survival rate appeared to
decrease in patients with MMP-9 expression compared with those
without MMP-9 expression, and in patients without TIMP-1 expression
compared with those with TIMP-1 expression, although their
difference was not statistically significant (P>0.05). However,
the correlation between the expressive imbalance of MMP-9 and TIMP-1
and the postoperative survival was demonstrated. The survival rate
was significantly decreased in patients with the co-expression
pattern 1 compared with those with the co-expression pattern 4 (P=0.0014, Table 3, Figure 3).
Table
3 Association between
the expression of MMP-9 (matrix metalloproteinase-9) and TIMP-1
(tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase-1) and the prognosis of
patients with gastric carcinoma
|
n
|
Survival
(%) |
P value
|
| 1
yr
|
2 yr
|
5 yr
|
| MMP-9
expression
|
| -
|
50
|
80.42
|
70.33
|
60.92
|
>0.05
|
| +
|
117
|
68.09
|
55.77
|
44.15
|
|
| TIMP-1
expression
|
| -
|
121
|
67.48
|
56.62
|
41.23
|
>0.05
|
| +
|
46
|
82.93
|
68.81
|
68.81 |
|
| Co-expression
of MMP-9
and TIMP-1
|
| A
|
83
|
64.87
|
53.62
|
36.75
|
<0.05
|
| B
|
34
|
76.08
|
60.90
|
60.90
|
|
| C
|
38
|
73.48
|
63.74
|
49.42
|
|
| D
|
12
|
100.00
|
88.89
|
88.89a
|
|
Note:
A: MMP-9(+)TIMP-1(-); B: MMP-9(+)TIMP-1(+); C: MMP-9(-)TIMP-1(-); D:
MMP-9(-)TIMP-1(+), aP<0.05 vs A.
Figure
3(PDF) The association
between expressive imbalance of MMP-9 (matrix metalloproteinase-9)
and TIMP-1 (tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase-1)and
postoperative survival in gastric carcinoma.
DISCUSSION
Expression
of MMP-9 and invasiveness, metastasis and prognosis of gastric
carcinoma
Degradation
of extracellular matrix (ECM) and basement membranes by the tumor
cells is a critical step in the processes of tumor invasion and
metastasis. MMP-9 is one member of the matrix metalloproteinase
families, and characterized by substrate high-specificity and
capable of degrading several components of ECM, including type IV
collagen molecules which form the major component of the basement
membrane. Increased levels of MMP-9 have been implicated in the
invasive potential of tumors[1-4]. There was a trend towards a
higher proportion of active MMP-9 with an increasing grade of breast
carcinoma, endometrial carcinoma, colorectal carcinoma, papillary
thyroid carcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck[15-19]. In this study, we observed positive expression of MMP-9
in 65.23 % of patients with gastric carcinoma, but no association of
the expression of MMP-9 with sex, age, tumor size and location.
These results were similar to the results reported by Murray et al[12] and Hou et
al[20]. In contrast to the Murray's
and Hou's
study, we also demonstrated there was a significant correlation
between MMP-9 expression and proliferation of tumor cells, the depth
of invasiveness, lymph node metastasis and TNM stage of gastric
carcinoma. Pereda et al also found that high levels of matrix
metalloproteinases promoted the proliferation of pituitary adenomas
cells[21]. Kabashima et al reported that MMP-9 expression correlated
with lymph node metastasis in intramucosal gastric carcinoma[22].
Torri et al reported that preoperative plasma MMP-9 concentration
correlated closely with severity of T, N and M classification, and
stage[23]. These results suggest that over-expression of MMP-9 plays
an important role in the progress of gastric carcinoma, and MMP-9
protein may be served as a marker for invasiveness and metastasis of
gastric carcinoma. We also noticed that MMP-9 expression increased
dramatically in advanced tumors compared with early tumors, whereas
there was no such difference between different stages of the
advanced tumors. These results suggested that MMP-9 expression might
play an important role in the early progress of gastric carcinoma.
Sier et al reported that the expression and activation of MMP-9 in
tumor tissues were of prognostic significance for poor overall
survival of the patients with gastric carcinoma, independent of the
major clinicopathological parameters[8,24]. Although there was a
decreasing trend of survival in the patients with MMP-9 expression
compared with those without the expression, the difference was no
significant. Maatta et al reported the similarly results in
hepatocellular carcinoma and pancreatic adenocarcinoma[25]. The
relation of MMP-9 to the prognosis of gastric carcinoma still was
needs to be further investigated.
Expression
of TIMP-1 and invasiveness, metastasis and prognosis of gastric
carcinoma
During
the process of invasiveness and metastasis of tumors, the secretion
and activation of metalloproteinases (MMPs) is not sufficient to
degrade ECM components, as its enzymatic activity can be inhibited
by a family of endogenous inhibitors, the tissue inhibitors of
metalloproteinase (TIMPs). TIMP-1, a 28.5 kDa glycoprotein, is the
first member of the TIMP family, and known to form a complex of 1:1
stoichiometry with activated collagenase, stromelysin and MMP-9 to
inhibit their activities. Watanabe et al found that the transfection
of the complete human TIMP-1 cDNA into highly metastatic human
gastric carcinoma cell line KKLS notably decreased the formation of
liver metastases when transplanted into nude mice[11]. It is
suggested that TMP-1 is a negative regulators in the process of
tumor metastasis. The expression of TIMP-1 in gastric carcinoma has
not been widely examined so far. In our study, a negative
association between TIMP-1 expression and invasiveness and
metastasis and TNM stage was observed, but there was no association
between TIMP-1 expression and sex, age, tumor size and location in
gastric carcinoma. These results were opposite to the results
reported by Mimori et al that the expression of TIMP-1 mRNA in the
biopsy samples from human gastric carcinoma tissues (T) was higher
than in the biopsy samples from the corresponding normal tissues
(N), and a higher T/N ratio of TIMP-1 mRNA correlated with lately
advanced stage and poor prognosis of human gastric carcinoma[26].
Other studies also showed that the increased TIMP-1 expression
correlated with poor prognosis variables, including shortened
survival, in patients with renal cell carcinoma and lung cancer[8,27]. Several studies have shown that TIMP-1 possesses two
activities, i.e. inhibitory activity of metalloproteinases, and
growth promoting function[2,28]. Our findings suggest that, TIMP-1
in the progress of human gastric carcinoma functions mainly as an
inhibitor of metalloproteinases, subsequently blocking the
invasiveness and metastasis of tumor cells. Our findings may offer a
new idea in the biological and genetic treatment for gastric
carcinoma[29-34]. In our study, the survival rate of patients with
TIMP-1 expression was higher than those without TIMP-1 expression,
although difference was not significant. Further studies are needed
to determine whether or not TIMP-1 expression alone can serve as a
marker predicting the prognosis of patients with gastric cancer.
Imbalance
between expression of MMP-9 and TIMP-1 in the invasiveness,
metastasis and prognosis of gastric carcinoma
Under
physiological conditions the expression of MMPs and TIMPs is highly
coordinated at the level of gene expression, and this balanced
expression guarantees normal tissue structure and organ function,
and prevents both excessive ECM deposition and increased ECM
degradation. As some factors in malignant tumors contributes to the
over-expression of MMPs without matched TIMP expression, and thus,
this balance was broken, thereby, the ECM was degraded and the
cancer metastasis was occurred. By contraries, over-expression of
TIMPs can prevent the degradation of ECM and inhibit the cancer
invasion and metastasis. TIMP-1 can bind to the catalytic domain of
MMP-9 in a 1:1 stochiometry to form complex, so inhibiting the
enzymatic activity of MMP-9 [2,9,10]. Murray et al revealed the
correlation between the expression of MMP-9 and the expression of
TIMP-1 in gastric carcinoma[12,27,35]. However, observation
concerning the association of imbalance between the expression of
MMP-9 and TIMP-1 with invasion and metastasis in gastric carcinoma
has rarely been published. We found that the tumor invasion and
metastasis was more frequent in the cases with positive expression
of MMP-9. However, the extents of invasion and metastasis in gastric
carcinoma significantly decreased if the TIMP-1 was also expressed
in these cases at the same time. This suggests that MMP-9 mainly
exert functions of promoting cancer invasion and metastasis, while
TIMP-1 independently exerts the inhibiting function for cancer
invasion and metastasis during the processes of the invasion and
metastasis of gastric carcinoma. We also found that the incidence of
visceral peritoneum invasion and lymph node metastasis was the
highest in the cases with MMP-9 expression but without TIMP-1
expression, whereas, the incidence of lymph node metastasis in the
cases with the TIMP-1 expression but without MMP-9 expression was
the lowest, with the modest incidence in cases with balanced
expression of MMP-9 and TIMP-1. These findings strongly support the
hypothesis the expressive imbalance between MMP-9 and TIMP-1 is an
important factor in tumor invasion and metastasis. In brief, altered
balance of expression between MMP-9 and TIMP-1 plays a central role
in progression of gastric carcinoma. According to our follow-up
information, we found, for the first time, that although MMP-9 or
TIMP-1 alone may not serve as an indicator for patient prognosis,
there is a significant association of the expressive imbalance
between MMP-9 and TIMP-1 with the postoperative survival of patients
with gastric carcinoma. Our data suggest that patients with
over-expression of MMP-9 and no expression of TIMP-1 have more
aggressive tumor progression and a lower survival rate.
In
conclusion, our results indicate a significant positive association
between MMP-9 expression and proliferation of tumor cells, the depth
of invasiveness, lymph node metastasis and TNM stage of gastric
carcinoma, suggesting MMP-9 can serve as a molecular marker of tumor
invasion and metastasis. Our results also demonstrate a significant
negative association of TIMP-1 expression with the depth of
invasiveness and lymph node metastasis, which provides a new idea in
tumor biological and genetic treatment. The interaction between
MMP-9 and TIMP-1 in the processes of tumor invasion and metastasis
is that MMP-9 mainly promotes tumor invasion and metastasis whereas
TIMP-1 inhibits the functions of MMP-9. Imbalance between MMP-9 and
TIMP-1 expression may predict the occurrence of tumor invasion and
metastasis and poor prognosis. For these patients with imbalanced
MMP-9 and TIMP-1 expression, the optimal treatment scheme needs to
be selected.
REFERENCES
1
Aznavoorian S, Murphy AN, Stetler-Stevenson WG, Liotta LA.
Molecular
aspects of tumor cell invasion and metastasis. Cancer
1993; 71: 1368-1383
2
Nagase H, Woessner JF Jr. Matrix metalloproteinases.
J Biol
Chem 1999; 274: 21491-21494
3
Westermarck J, Kahari VM. Regulation of matrix
metalloproteinase expression
in tumor invasion. FASEB J 1999; 13:
781-792
4
Ellenrieder V, Adler G, Gress TM. Invasion and metastasis
in
pancreatic cancer. Ann Oncol 1999; 10(S): 41-45
5
Yoshizaki T, Sato H, Furukawa M. Recent advances in the
regulation of matrix metalloproteinase 2 activation: from
basic
research to clinical implication. Oncol Rep 2002; 9: 607-611
6
Hofmann UB, Westphal JR, Van Muijen GN, Ruiter DJ. Matrix
metalloproteinases in human melanoma. J Invest
Dermatol
2000; 115: 337-344
7
Ramos-DeSimone N, Hahn-Dantona E, Sipley J, Nagase H, French
DL,
Quigley JP. Activation of matrix metalloproteinase-9 (MMP-9) via
a
converging plasmin/stromelysin-1 cascade enhances tumor cell
invasion. J Biol Chem 1999; 274: 13066-13076
8
Kallakury BV, Karikehalli S, Haholu A, Sheehan CE, Azumi N,
Ross JS.
Increased expression of matrix metalloproteinases 2 and 9
and tissue
inhibitors of metalloproteinases 1 and 2 correlate with
poor prognostic
variables in renal cell carcinoma. Clin Cancer Res
2001; 7: 3113-3119
9
Goldberg GI, Strongin A, Collier IE, Genrich LT, Marmer BL.
Interaction
of 92-kDa type IV collagenase with the tissue inhibitor
of
metalloproteinases prevents dimerization, complex formation with
interstitial collagenase, and activation of the proenzyme with
stromelysin. J Biol Chem 1992; 267: 4583-4591
10
Olson MW, Gervasi DC, Mobashery S, Fridman R. Kinetic
analysis of the
binding of human matrix metalloproteinase-2 and 9 to
tissue inhibitor
of metalloproteinase (TIMP)-1 and TIMP-2. J BIOL
Chem 1997; 272: 29975-29983
11
Watanabe M, Takahashi Y, Ohta T, Mai M, Sasaki T, Seiki M.
Inhibition
of metastasis in human gastric cancer cells transfected
with tissue
inhibitor of metalloproteinase 1 gene in nude mice.
Cancer 1996; 77: 1676-1680
12
Murray GI, Duncan ME, Arbuckle E, Melvin WT, Fothergill JE.
Matrix
metalloproteinases and their inhibitors in gastric cancer.
Gut 1998; 43: 791-797
13 Fenoglio-Preiser C, Munoz N, Carneiro F, Powell SM, Correa P,
Rugge M,
Guilford P, Sasako M, Lambert R, Stolte M, Megraud F,
Watanabe H.
Tumours of the stomach. In: Hamilton SR, Aaltonen LA
eds. World
health organization classification of tumours: Pathology
and genetics of
tumours of the digestive system. 1st ed. Lyon: IARC
Press 2000: 37-67
14 Owen DA. The stomach In: Sternberg SS eds. Diagnostic
surgical
pathology. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams And
Wilkins 1999: 1330-1334
15
Davies B, Miles DW, Happerfield LC, Naylor MS, Bobrow LG,
Rubens RD,
Balkwill FR. Activity of type IV collagenases in benign
and malignant
breast disease. Br J Cancer 1993; 67: 1126-1131
16
Di Nezza LA, Misajon A, Zhang J, Jobling T, Quinn MA, Ostor
AG, Nie G,
Lopata A, Salamonsen LA. Presence of active gelatinases
in endometrial
carcinoma and correlation of matrix metalloproteinase
expression with
increasing tumor grade and invasion. Cancer 2002;
94: 1466-1475
17
Baker EA, Bergin FG, Leaper DJ. Matrix metalloproteinases,
their tissue
inhibitors and colorectal cancer staging. Br J Surg
2000; 87: 1215-1221
18
Maeta H, Ohgi S, Terada T. Protein expression of matrix
metalloproteinases
2 and 9 and tissue inhibitors of
metalloproteinase 1 and 2 in papillary thyroid
carcinomas. Virchows
Arch 2001; 438: 121-128
19 O-Charoenrat P, Rhys-Evans PH, Eccles SA. Expression of
matrix
metalloproteinases and their inhibitors correlates with
invasion and metastasis
in squamous cell carcinoma of the head and
neck. Arch Otolaryngol Head
Neck Surg 2001; 127: 813-820
20
Hou L, Li Y, Jia YH, Wang B, Xin Y, Ling MY, Lü S. Molecular
mechanism about
lymphogenous metastasis of hepatocarcinoma cells in
mice. World J
Gastroenterol 2001; 7: 532-536
21
Paez Pereda M, Ledda MF, Goldberg V, Chervin A, Carrizo G,
Molina H, Muller
A, Renner U, Podhajcer O, Arzt E, Stalla GK. High
levels of matrix
metalloproteinases regulate proliferation and
hormone secretion in pituitary cells.
J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2000;
85: 263-269
22
Kabashima A, Maehara Y, Kakeji Y, Baba H, Koga T, Sugimachi
K.
Clinicopathological features and overexpression of matrix
metalloproteinases
in intramucosal gastric carcinoma with lymph node
metastasis. Clin Cancer
Res 2000; 6: 3581-3584
23
Torii A, Kodera Y, Uesaka K, Hirai T, Yasui K, Morimoto T,
Yamamura Y, Kato
T, Hayakawa T, Fujimoto N, Kito T. Plasma
concentration of matrix
metalloproteinase 9 in gastric cancer. Br J
Surg 1997; 84: 133-136
24
Sier CF, Kubben FJ, Ganesh S, Heerding MM, Griffioen G,
Hanemaaijer R,
van Krieken JH, Lamers CB, Verspaget HW. Tissue
levels of matrix
metalloproteinases MMP-2 and MMP-9 are related to
the overall survival of
patients with gastric carcinoma. Br J Cancer
1996; 74: 413-417
25
Maatta M, Soini Y, Liakka A, Autio-Harmainen H. Differential
expression of
matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)-2, MMP-9, and membrane
type 1-MMP in
hepatocellular and pancreatic adenocarcinoma:
implications for tumor
progression and clinical prognosis. Clin
Cancer Res 2000; 6: 2726-2734
26
Mimori K, Mori M, Shiraishi T, Fujie T, Baba K, Haraguchi M,
Abe R, Ueo H,
Akiyoshi T. Clinical signification of tissue inhibitor
of metalloproteinase
expression in gastric carcinoma. Br J Cancer
1997; 76: 531-536
27
Ylisirnio S, Hoyhtya M, Makitaro R, Paakko P, Risteli J,
Kinnula VL,
Turpeenniemi-Hujanen T, Jukkola A. Elevated serum levels
of type
ñcollagen degradation marker ICTP and tissue inhibitor of
metalloproteinase (TIMP) 1 are associated with poor prognosis in
lung cancer. Clin Cancer Res 2001; 7: 1633-1637
28
Chesler L, Golde DW, Bersch N, Johnson MD. Metalloproteinase
inhibition and erythroid potentiation are independent activities of
tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase-1. Blood 1995; 86: 4506-4515
29
Coussens LM, Fingleton B, Matrisian LM. Matrix
metalloproteinase
inhibitors and cancer: trials and tribulations.
Sicence 2002; 295: 2387-2392
30
Tosetti F, Ferrari N, De Flora S, Albini A. 'Angioprevention':
angiogenesis
is a common and key target for cancer chemopreventive
agents.
FASEB J 2002; 16: 2-14
31
Yoshizaki T, Sato H, Furukawa M. Recent advances in the
regulation of
matrix metalloproteinase 2 activation: from basic
research to clinical
implication. Oncl Rep 2002; 9: 607-611
32
Hoekstra R, Eskens FA, Verweij J. Matrix metalloproteinase
inhibitors:
current developments and future perspectives. Oncologist
2001; 6: 415-427
33
Verhagen AM, Lock P. Revealing the intricacies of cancer.
Genome Biol 2002; 3: reports4015.1-4015.5
34
Brown PD. Matrix metalloproteinases in gastrointestinal
cancer.
Gut 1998; 43: 161-163
35
Arnold SM, Young AB, Munn RK, Patchell RA, Nanayakkara N,
Markesbery WR.
Expression of p53, bcl-2, E-cadherin, matrix
metalloproteinase-9, and tissue
inhibitor of metalloproteinases-1 in
paired primary tumors and brain
metastasis. Clin Cancer Res 1999; 5:
4028-4033
Edited
by Xia HHX
|