| P.O.Box 2345, Beijing 100023,China | World J Gastroenterol 2003 Feb 15;9(2):364-367 |
| Email: wjg@wjgnet.com | WJG ISSN 1007-9327 CN 14-1219/ R |
| http:// www.wjgnet.com | Copyright © 2003 by The WJG Press |
Changes in the level of serum liver enzymes after laparoscopic surgery
Min Tan, Feng-Feng Xu, Jun-Shen Peng, Dong-Ming Li, Liu-Hua Chen, Bao-Jun Lv, Zhen-Xian Zhao, Chen Huang, Chao-Xu Zheng
Min Tan, Feng-Feng Xu, Jun-Shen
Peng, Dong-Ming Li, Liu-Hua Chen, Bao-Jun Lv, Zhen-Xian Zhao, Chen Huang,
Chao-Xu Zheng, Department of General
Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhong Shan University, 58 Zhongshan 2
Road Guangzhou 510080, Guangdong Province China
Correspondence to: Dr
Min Tan, Department of General Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of Sun
Yat-sen University, 58 Zhongshan 2 Road Guangzhou 510080, Guangdong Province
China. tommyt@vip.163.com
Telephone:
+86-20-87766335 Fax: +86-20-87750632
Received:
2002-06-29 Accepted: 2002-07-24
Abstract
AIM: The purpose of this study was to
investigate the effect of laparoscopic surgery on liver function in humans and
the possible mechanisms behind such effect.
METHODS: Blood samples from 286 patients
who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) and 40 patients who underwent
open cholecystectomy (OC) were tested for liver function by measuring the level
of serum alanine aminotrasferase (ALT) and aspartate aminotrasferase (AST)
before and after the operations. The same tests were also applied to 18
laparoscopic colorectal cancer resection (LCR) patients and 23 open colorectal
cancer resection (OCR) patients to determine whether CO2
pneumoperitoneum could alter the serum liver enzymes.
RESULTS: The level of serum ALT and AST
increased significantly during the first 48 hours post operations in both LC and
LCR patients. However, no significant change of the serum liver enzymes was
detected in both OC and OCR patients. As a result, there was statistically
significant difference in change of both ALT and AST levels between LC and OC
patients and LCR and OCR patients, respectively. By the 7th day post operation,
the level of both enzymes returned to normal values in LC, OC and OCR patients
except LCR patients whose enzymes remained at a higher level.
CONCLUSION: Transient elevation of
hepatic transaminases occurred after laparoscopic surgery. The major causative
factor seemed to be the CO2 pneumoperitoneum. In most of the
laparoscopic surgery patients, the transient elevation of serum liver enzymes
showed no apparent clinical implications. However, if preoperative liver
function was very poor, laparoscopic surgery may not be the best choice for the
treatment of patients with certain abdominal diseases.
Tan M, Xu FF, Peng JS, Li DM, Chen LH, Lv BJ, Zhao ZX, Huang C, Zheng CX.
Changes in the level of serum liver enzymes after laparoscopic surgery. World
J Gastroenterol 2003; 9(2): 364-367
http://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/9/364.htm
INTRODUCTION
The introduction of laparoscopic surgery
has profoundly changed the way for the management of patients with both
gallbladder disease and common bile duct stone, and the laparoscopic
cholecystectomy (LC) has become the "gold standard" in the treatment
of benign gallbladder diseases such as gallbladder stone and cholecystitis[1-4].
However, little attention has been paid to effects on liver function by
laparoscopic surgery. We noticed in clinical practice that, following
laparoscopic surgery, the level of certain serum liver enzymes rose markedly in
most patients who had shown normal preoperative liver function tests. This
clinical observation raises several questions. Are these changes of any clinical
significance? What is the mechanism responsible for these changes? Do other
laparoscopic operations cause the same changes? To address these questions, we
conducted a prospective study to compare changes in serum liver enzymes before
and after operations between LC and open cholecystectomy (OC) and laparoscopic
colorectal cancer resection (LCR) with open colorectal resection (OCR).
MATERIALS AND METHODS
A total of 286 patients (102 men
and 184 women with mean age of 48.6 years and range of 21-89 years) underwent
elective LC from February 2001 to April 2002. During the same period, 40
patients (18 men and 22 women with mean age of 51.2 years and range of 29-86
years) with symptomatic cholelithiasis, gallbladder stone or gallbladder polypus
underwent OC and were included for the study. For comparison, 18 LCR (10 men and
8 women with mean age of 62.8 years and range of 43-85 years) and 23 OCR
patients (16 men and 7 women with mean age of 61.6 years and range of 39-76
years) were also selected for the study. The LCR cases included 2 descending
colon cancers, 7 sigmoid colon cancers and 9 rectal cancers. The OCR patients
included 4 ascending colon cancers, 6 transverse colon cancers, 1 descending
colon cancers, 6 sigmoid colon cancers and 6 rectal cancers.
All patients selected for the study had normal
values of serum liver enzymes prior to the operations. The following patients
were excluded from the study: those who had undergone endoscopic retrograde
cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) and endoscopic sphincterotomy (EST) within one
week before laparoscopic operation. The cases who developed complications such
as bile duct injury, obstruction, infection, leakage and high fever by any
reason were also excluded. All colorectal cancer patients included for the study
had no evidence of cancer metastasis to liver by B-ultrasonic and CT scan.
Serum liver enzymes alanine amino transferase
(ALT) and aspartate aminotransferase (AST) were measured before operations and
1, 2 and 7 days post operation to assess liver function except for LC patients.
The LC patients were randomly divided into two groups before the operation, with
group A of 143 LC patients tested for the liver function postoperatively on days
1 and 7 and group B of 143 patients tested for the liver function
postoperatively on days 2 and 7. All LC and LCR patients received operation by
one surgeon. The OC operations were performed by 3 surgeons from the same
Division. The OCR operations were performed by the same team of surgical staff.
All patients received general anesthesia except OC patients who received local
anesthesia. The operations on LC and LCR patients were performed with four-cannula
technique. During laparoscopic surgery, the intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) was
maintained at a range of 12-14 mmHg. Monopolar diathermy was used in LC and OC
patients to dissect the gallbladder from the liver beds. Ultrasonic scissors and
bipolar diathermy were used in LCR to dissect the mesenteric
vessels.
All data were expressed as the mean ±standard deviation. Student t
test was used to analyse the difference in level of serum liver enzymes before
and after LC, OC, LCR and OCR. The P value less than 0.05 was considered
to be statistically significant.
RESULTS
Postoperative liver failure or
mortality did not occur in any of the patients studied, and all the patients
were hemodynamically stable during the perioperative period.
The
level of serum ALT and AST increased significantly within 24-48 hours following
operations in LC and LCR patients compared with those in OC and OCR patients
(Table 1). In details, the mean pre- and post operation serum levels of ALT were
respectively 23.3 U·L-1 and 38.8 U·L-1 in LC patients of group A
(P<0.05), 21.5 U·L-1 and 44.2U·L-1 in LC patients of group B
(P<0.01), and 22.6 U·L-1 and 45.7 U·L-1 in LCR patients (P<0.01).
In contrast, ALT only increased from a preoperative mean of 21.8 U·L-1 to 28.2 U·L-1 in OC patients (P>0.05)
and from 22.2 U·L-1 to 30.6 U·L-1 in OCR patients (P>0.05).
The degree of change in ALT following the operations was greater in LC patients
than that in OC patients (P<0.05, D1), P<0.01, D2), so was
the change between LCR and OCR patients (P <0.05, D1 and D7), P<0.01,
D2).
Similar changes were observed in the mean value
of serum AST. The AST increased significantly after operation in LC patients
(from 28.4 to 41.5 U·L-1, P<0.05, D1)
and 27.1 up to 48.7 U·L-1, P<0.01, D2)
and LCR patients (from 27.3 to 40.7 U·L-1, P<0.05, D1)
and to 45.5 U·L-1, P<0.01, D2).
In OC and OCR patients, however, the AST showed only a small degree of increase
(Table 1). The change of AST due to the operations was also greater in LC
patients than that in OC patients (P<0.05, D1), P<0.01, D2),
and so was the change between LCR and OCR (P<0.05, D1 and D7), P<0.01,
D2).
Seven days following the operations, both enzymes
returned to normal value in LC, OC and OCR patients except in LCR patients whose
enzymes, although lower than day 2 level, remained higher (ALT 37.2 U·L-1, D7, P<0.05)
and AST 38.6 U·L-1 (D7, P<0.05)
(Table 1).
Table 1 Preoperative and
postoperative level of serum liver enzymes
| n | Preoperation | D1 | D2 | D7 | |
| ALT | |||||
| LC(a) | 143 | 23.3±11.6 | 38.8±15.2ac | 25.1±14.3 | |
| LC(b) | 143 | 21.5±12.9 | 44.2±14.5bc | 26.3±11.7 | |
| OC | 40 | 21.8±16.7 | 28.2±13.7 | 27.3±18.3 | 24.2±11.1 |
| LCR | 18 | 22.6±10.9 | 39.3±13.4ac | 45.7±17.2bd | 37.2±18.1ac |
| OCR | 23 | 22.2±17.3 | 29.6±11.8 | 30.6±15.5 | 27.1±11.2 |
| AST | |||||
| LC(a) | 143 | 28.4±20.2 | 41.5±24.7ac | 29.1±18.7 | |
| LC(b) | 143 | 27.1±18.8 | 48.7±20.8bd | 29.6±15.4 | |
| OC | 40 | 25.2±17.6 | 31.8±22.1 | 32.6±21.1 | 27.9±16.6 |
| LCR | 18 | 27.3±16.1 | 40.7±27.3ac | 45.5±22.2bc | 38.6±20.3ac |
| OCR | 23 | 26.8±19.5 | 30.2±25.1 | 32.9±24.6 | 28.5±18.6 |
n=cases,
Preo-=Preoperative, aP<0.05, bP<0.01
vs Preo-; cP<0.05, dP<0.01 vs
OC; cP<0.05, dP<0.01 vs OCR.
In
this study, we also tested other liver function indice such as total bilirubin (TBIL),
direct bilirubin (DBIL), alkaline phosphatase (ALP), lactic dehydrogenase (LDH),
total protein (TP) and gamma glutamyl transferase (GGT) (data not shown). In
general, TBIL and DBIL showed a slight increase within 24-48 hours following
operation in some patients, but the changes were within normal range, and these
values returned to preoperative levels. Other liver function test indice did not
show significant alteration.
DISCUSSION
Changes in serum levels of liver enzymes
in LC rather than OC patients had been reported before[5-9]. In order
to understand whether or not CO2 pneumoperitoneum could cause these
changes, we tested the liver function of patients who received LCR or OCR. Our
present studies suggest that these transient postoperative hypertransaminases in
LC and LCR patients might be attributed to the following possible factors.
The first factor of consideration was CO2
pneumoperitoneum. Both LC and LCR patients were subject to CO2
pneumoperitoneum during the operations and they showed significant changes in
serum liver enzymes after operation. In contrast, both OC and OCR patients were
under the operation conditions similar to those of LC and LCR patients except
that they were not subject to CO2 pneumoperitoneum and they showed no
apparent change in the level of serum liver enzymes. This finding is consistent
with other studies that showed similar changes in liver function clearance test
after pneumoperitoneum[10-16]. Because an intra-abdominal pressure (IAP)
of 12-14 mmHg used in the present laparoscopic surgery was higher than the
normal portal blood pressure of 7-10 mmHg, this operation might, therefore,
reduce portal blood flow and cause alteration in liver function[17-20].
On the other hand, the elevation and depression of IAP in a short time during
laparoscopic operation might be causative as well. During laparoscopic
procedure, the sudden alteration of IAP could cause the undulation of portal
blood flow. This undulation and "re-irrigation"
of organs blood flow may give rise to "ischemia
and re-irrigation" damage of tissues and organs, especially the Kupffer and
the endothelial cells of the hepatic sinusoids[21]. The mesothelial
cells were bulging up and the intercellular clefts thereby increased in size,
and the underlying basal lamina became visible[22]. During LC, an IAP
of 8 mmHg was found to decrease the hepatic microcirculation significantly[23,24].
Therefore, the elevation of IAP caused by CO2 pneumoperitoneum may be
the main reason behind these changes.
A
second possible mechanism for alterations of serum liver enzymes after LC is the
"squeeze" pressure effect on the liver. The
traction of the gallbladder may free these enzymes into the blood stream. But in
our study, 40 OC were performed with a small wound within 6 cm. There should be
the same or more "squeeze" pressure effect
on the liver in these patients, yet the change of serum liver enzymes was
different between LC and OC patients. In addition, the same changes occurred in
LCR patients. This mechanism remains to be determined in animal models.
The
third possibility may be the local effect of prolonged use of diathermy to the
liver surface and spread of heat to liver parenchyma. This hypothesis is
supported by some other studies[25-31]. However, similar type and
intensity of diathermy were used in both OC and LC patients and it remains to be
explained why the serum liver enzyme level increased in LCR patients whose focus
was far from liver. While the thermal damage to liver by diathermy is generally
recognized, there are no references available in the literature that compared
the postoperative enzyme levels between cholecystectomies performed with and
without the use of diathermy in humans.
In addition, transient liver dysfunction occurs
in patients after some general anesthesia[32-41]. This complication
is associated with anesthesia-induced changes in splanchnic blood flow and
oxygen consumption. However, the anesthesia-induced hepatic hypoperfusion may
not be the cause of elevation of transaminases after LC and LCR as the same
anesthesia protocols was used in our 23 OCR patients who did not show marked
postoperative change in serum liver enzymes. It seems that the anesthesia could
not acted exclusively to cause these changes. Other studies have also shown
similar liver function test results in both LC and OC cases with general
anesthesia[42].
Another possible mechanism of alterations of
serum liver enzymes that had been considered was the inadvertent clipping of the
right branch of the hepatic artery or any other aberrant arterial branch
supplying blood to the liver. When Calot's triangle
has dense or cicatricial adhesion, the related arterial branch could be easily
injured. This, however, should be followed by a massive increase in liver
enzymes and usually has clinical implications[43-45]. Nevertheless,
the LCR hardly gave rise to any chance to injure the right branch of the hepatic
artery, yet the LCR patients showed marked elevation of ALT and AST
postoperatively. Therefore, arterial branch injury could be ruled out in almost
LC patients.
In summary, our present studies demonstrated that
transient elevation of hepatic transaminases could occur after laparoscopic
procedures. These changes might be attributed to hepatocellular dysfunction
secondary to one or combination of CO2 pneumoperitoneum, diathermy,
extruding liver, branch of the hepatic artery injured and general anesthesia.
Based on our findings, the CO2 pneumoperitoneum might be one of the
main reasons for the change of serum liver enzymes. However, the transient
elevation of hepatic transaminases showed no apparent clinical implication in
most patients who received laparoscopic surgery according to follow-up
observations and feedback from these patients. Nevertheless, these results
indicate that, if the patient's preoperative
liver function was very poor, laparoscopic surgery might not be the optimal
choice for treating certain abdominal diseases[46].
REFERENCES
1
Cuschieri A.
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J R Coll Surg Edinb 1999; 44: 187-192
2 Himal HS. Minimally invasive (laparoscopic) surgery. Surg
Endosc 2002; 8: 265-270
3 Suter M, Meyer A. A 10-year experience with the use of
laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis: is it safe?
Surg Endosc 2001; 15: 1187-1192
4 Kiely JM, Brannigan AE, Foley E, Cheema S, O払rien
W, Delaney PV. Day case laparoscopic cholecystectomy is feasible.
Ir J Med Sci 2001; 170: 98-99
5 Giraudo G, Brachet Contul R, Caccetta M, Morino M. Gasless
laparoscopy could avoid alterations in hepatic function.
Surg Endosc 2001; 15: 741-746
6 Morino M, Giraudo G, Festa V. Alterations in hepatic
function during laparoscopic surgery. An experimental clinical study.
Surg Endos 1998; 12: 968-972
7 Sala-Blanch X, Fontanals J, Martinez-Palli G, Taura P,
Delgado S, Bosch J, Lacy AM, Visa J. Effects of carbon dioxide vs helium
pneumoperitoneum on hepatic blood flow. Surg Endosc
1998; 12: 1121-1125
8 Kotake Y, Takeda J, Matsumoto M, Tagawa M, Kikuchi H.
Subclinical hepatic dysfunction in laparoscopic cholecystectomy and
laparoscopic colectomy. Br J Anaesth 2001; 87:
774-777
9 Andrei VE, Schein M, Margolis M, Rucinski JC, Wise L. Liver
enzymes are commonly elevated following laparoscopic
cholecystectomy: is elevated intra-abdominal pressure
the cause? Dig Surg 1998; 15: 256-259
10 Sato K, Kawamura T, Wakusawa R. Hepatic blood flow and function in
elderly patients undergoing laparoscopic
cholecystectomy. Anesth Analg 2000; 90:
1198-1202
11 Takagi S. Hepatic and portal vein blood flow during carbon dioxide
pneumoperitoneum for laparoscopic hepatectomy.
Surg Endosc 1998; 12: 427-431
12 Richter S, Olinger A, Hildebrandt U, Menger MD, Vollmar B. Loss of
physiologic hepatic blood flow control ("epatic
arterial
buffer response") during CO2-pneumoperitoneum
in the rat. Anesth Analg 2001; 93: 872-877
13 Perner A, Bugge K, Lyng KM, Schulze S, Kristensen PA, Bendtsen A.
Changes in plasma potassium concentration during
carbon dioxide pneumoperitoneum. Br J Anaesth 1999;
82: 137-139
14 Tunon MJ, Gonzalez P, Jorquera F, Llorente A, Gonzalo-Orden M,
Gonzalez-Gallego J. Liver blood flow changes during
laparoscopic surgery in pigs. A study of hepatic
indocyanine green removal. Surg Endosc 1999; 13: 668-672
15 Klopfenstein CE, Morel DR, Clergue F, Pastor CM. Effects of abdominal
CO2 insufflation and changes of position on hepatic
blood flow in anesthetized pigs. Am J Physiol 1998;
275: H900-905
16 Schafer M, Sagesser H, Reichen J, Krahenbuhl L. Alterations in
hemodynamics and hepatic and splanchnic circulation during
laparoscopy in rats. Surg Endosc 2001; 15:
1197-1201
17 Schmandra TC, Kim ZG, Gutt CN. Effect of insufflation gas and
intraabdominal pressure on portal venous flow during
pneumoperitoneum in the rat. Surg Endosc 2001; 15:
405-408
18 Glantzounis GK, Tselepis AD, Tambaki AP, Trikalinos TA, Manataki AD,
Galaris DA, Tsimoyiannis EC, Kappas AM.
Laparoscopic surgery-induced changes in oxidative
stress markers in human plasma. Surg Endosc 2001; 15: 1315-1319
19 Tsugawa K, Hashizume M, Migou S, Tanoue K, Kishihara F, Kawanaka H,
Sugimachi K. The effect of carbon dioxide
pneumoperitoneum on the portal hemodynamics in a
portal-hypertensive rat model. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan
Tech 1999; 9: 338-347
20 Bendet N, Morozov V, Lavi R, Panski M, Halevy A, Scapa E. Does
laparoscopic cholecystectomy influence peri-sinusoidal
cell activity? Hepatogastroenterology 1999; 46:
1603-1606
21 Volz J, Koster S, Spacek Z, Paweletz N. Characteristic alterations of
the peritoneum after carbon dioxide pneumoperitoneum.
Surg Endosc 1999; 13: 611-614
22 Gutt CN, Schmandra TC. Portal venous flow during CO2 pneumoperitoneum
in the rat. Surg Endosc 1999; 13: 902-905
23 Jakimowicz J, Stultiens G, Smulders F. Laparoscopic insufflation of
the abdomen reduces portal venous flow.
Surg Endosc 1998;12: 129-132
24 Dessole S, Rubattu G, Capobianco G, Caredda S, Cherchi PL. Utility of
bipolar electrocautery scissors for abdominal
hysterectomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2000; 183:
396-399
25 Raut V, Bhat N, Kinsella J, Toner JG, Sinnathuray AR, Stevenson M.
Bipolar scissors versus cold dissection tonsillectomy:
a prospective, randomized, multi-unit study.
Laryngoscope 2001; 111: 2178-2182
26 Tulikangas PK, Smith T, Falcone T, Boparai N, Walters MD. Gross and
histologic characteristics of laparoscopic injuries
with four different energy sources. Fertil Steril 2001;
75: 806-810
27 Capelluto E, Champault G. Variations in intraperitoneal temperature
during laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
Ann Chir 2000;125: 259-262
28 Barrat C, Capelluto E, Champault G. Intraperitoneal thermal variations
during laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc
1999; 13: 136-138
29 Shamiyeh A, Schrenk P, Tulipan L, Vattay P, Bogner S, Wayand W. A new
bipolar feedback-controlled sealing system
for closure of the cystic duct and artery. Surg Endosc
2002; 16: 812-813
30 Yang W, Benjamin IS, Sherwood R, Alexander B. Correlation of
endothelium-dependent and -independent vasodilatation
with liver function tests during prolonged perfusion of
the rat liver. J Pharmacol Toxicol Methods 1998; 40: 227-234
31 Berger M, Junemann K, Schramm H. Danger of monopolar current in
laparoscopic gallbladder surgery.
Zentralbl Chir 2001; 126: 591-595
32 Scapa E, Pinhasov I, Eshchar J. Does general anesthesia affect
sinusoidal liver cells as measured by beta-N-acetyl
hexosaminidase serum activity level?
Hepatogastroenterology 1998; 45: 1813-1815
33 Shimamoto A, Tanaka E, Mizuno D, Misawa S. Age- and sex-related
changes in toluene metabolism by rat hepatic
microsomes in vitro. Res Commun Mol Pathol Pharmacol
1999; 104: 265-276
34 Zamparelli M, Eaton S, Quant PA, McEwan A, Spitz L, Pierro A.
Analgesic doses of fentanyl impair oxidative metabolism of
neonatal hepatocytes. J Pediatr Surg 1999; 34:
260-263
35 Tanaka E, Yamazaki K, Misawa S. Update: the clinical importance of
acetaminophen hepatotoxicity in non-alcoholic and
alcoholic subjects. J Clin Pharm Ther 2000; 25:
325-332
36 Obata R, Bito H, Ohmura M, Moriwaki G, Ikeuchi Y, Katoh T, Sato S. The
effects of prolonged low-flow sevoflurane anesthesia
on renal and hepatic function. Anesth Analg 2000; 91:
1262-1268
37 Ichinose K, Yanagi F, Higashi K, Kozuma S, Akasaka T. Recurrent
transient increases in liver enzymes specifically after
isoflurane anesthesia. Masui 1999; 48: 421-423
38 Nishiyama T, Yokoyama T, Hanaoka K. Liver function after sevoflurane
or isoflurane anaesthesia in neurosurgical patients.
Can J Anaesth 1998; 45: 753-756
39 McEwen MM, Gleed RD, Ludders JW, Stokol T, Del Piero F, Erb HN.
Hepatic effects of halothane and isoflurane anesthesia
in goats. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2000; 217:
1697-1700
40 Darling JR, Sharpe PC, Stiby EK, McAteer JA, Archbold GP, Milligan KR.
Serum mitochondrial aspartate transaminase activity
after isoflurane or halothane anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth
2000; 85: 195-198
41 Feierman DE. The effect of paracetamol (acetaminophen) on fentanyl
metabolism in vitro. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand
2000; 44: 560-563
42 Saber AA, Laraja RD, Nalbandian HI, Pablos-Mendez A, Hanna K. Changes
in liver function tests after laparoscopic
cholecystectomy: not so rare, not always ominous. Am
Surg 2000; 66: 699-702
43 Kayaalp C, Nessar G, Kaman S, Akoglu M. Right liver necrosis:
complication of laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
Hepatogastroenterology 2001; 48: 1727-1729
44 Balsara KP, Dubash C, Shah CR. Pseudoaneurysm of the hepatic artery
along with common bile duct injury following
laparoscopic cholecystectomy. A report of two cases.
Surg Endosc 1998; 12: 276-277
45 Mathisen O, Soreide O, Bergan A. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: bile
duct and vascular injuries: management and outcome.
Scand J Gastroenterol 2002; 37: 476-481
46 Tsuboi S, Kitano S, Yoshida T, Bandoh T, Ninomiya K, Baatar D. Effects
of carbon dioxide pneumoperitoneum on
hemodynamics in cirrhotic rats. Surg Endosc 2002; 3[epub
ahead of print]
Edited by Liu HX