|
Laszlo
Lakatos, Tunde Pandur, Gyula David, 1st Department of
Medicine, Csolnoky F. Province Hospital, Veszprem
Zsuzsanna Balogh, Department of Medicine, Grof Eszterhazy
Hospital, Papa
Pal Kuronya, Department of Infectious Diseases, Magyar Imre
Hospital, Ajka
Arpad Tollas, Department of Medicine, Municipal Hospital,
Varpalota
Peter Laszlo Lakatos, 1st Department of Medicine,
Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
Correspondence to: Laszlo Lakatos, MD, 1st Department of
Medicine, Csolnoky F. Province Hospital, Korhaz u.1, Veszprem,
H-8200 Hungary. laklaci@hotmail.com
Telephone: +36-20-911-9339
Fax: +36-1-313-0250
Received: 2003-06-21
Accepted: 2003-08-02
Abstract
AIM: IBD is a systemic disease associated with a large number of
extraintestinal manifestations (EIMs). Our aim was to determine the
prevalence of EIMs in a large IBD cohort in Veszprem Province in a
25-year follow-up study.
METHODS:
Eight hundred and seventy-three IBD patients were enrolled
(ulcerative colitis/UC/: 619, m/f: 317/302, mean age at
presentation: 38.3 years, average disease duration: 11.2 years;
Crohn’s disease/CD/: 254, m/f: 125/129, mean age at presentation:
32.5 years, average disease duration: 9.2 years). Intestinal,
extraintestinal signs and laboratory tests were monitored regularly.
Any alteration suggesting an EIMs was investigated by a specialist.
RESULTS:
A total of 21.3 % of patients with IBD had EIM (UC: 15.0 %, CD: 36.6
%). Age at presentation did not affect the likelihood of EIM.
Prevalence of EIMs was higher in women and in CD, ocular
complications and primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) were more
frequent in UC. In UC there was an increased tendency of EIM in
patients with a more extensive disease. Joint complications were
more frequent in CD (22.4 % vs UC 10.2 %, P<0.01). In UC
positive family history increased the risk of joint complications
(OR:3.63). In CD the frequency of type-1 peripheral arthritis was
increased in patients with penetrating disease (P=0.028). PSC
was present in 1.6 % in UC and 0.8 % in CD. Dermatological
complications were present in 3.8 % in UC and 10.2 % in CD, the rate
of ocular complications was around 3 % in both diseases. Rare
complications were glomerulonephritis, autoimmune hemolytic anaemia
and celiac disease.
CONCLUSION:
Prevalence of EIM in Hungarian IBD patients is in concordance with
data from Western countries. The high number of EIM supports a role
for complex follow-up in these patients.
Lakatos
L, Pandur T, David G, Balogh Z, Kuronya P, Tollas A, Lakatos PL.
Association of extraintestinal manifestations of inflammatory bowel
disease in a province of western Hungary with disease phenotype:
Results of a 25-year follow-up study. World J Gastroenterol
2003; 9(10):2300-2307
http://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/9/2300.asp
INTRODUCTION
Ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn’s disease (CD) are chronic
inflammatory diseases of undetermined origin. Inflammatory bowel
disease (IBD) is a multifactorial polygenic disease with probable
genetic heterogeneity. In this hypothesis, the disease may develop
in a genetically predisposed host as a consequence of altered
mucosal barrier and disregulated immune response to environmental,
in particular enteric antigens, resulting in continuous
immune-mediated inflammation[1-4]. IBD predominantly
affects the gastrointestinal system but it is associated with a
large number of extraintestinal manifestations (EIMs)[5].
Some disorders parallel the activity of the bowel disease but for a
number of these conditions, their courses run independently of the
course of the intestinal disease[6,7]. Furthermore, there
has been some variance in the literature as to whether these EIMs
are more associated with CD or UC. In the classical study of
Greenstein et al.[8] EIMs were classified as
colitis associated, small bowel associated and none specific
manifestations.
EIMs
contribute significantly to morbidity and mortality. Defining
specific associations of immune mediated diseases in extraintestinal
sites and IBD may be helpful in the better understanding of the
pathogenesis of IBD.
The
pathogenesis of EIMs is also multifactorial. The role of genetic
factors is supported by family and candidate (e.g. certain HLA) gene
studies[9-11]. The role of humoral immunity is supported
by the higher prevalence of autoantibodies in the presence of EIMs,
especially pANCA in primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC). The
immunological and clinical connections between these diseases and
IBD have never been fully elucidated.
In
this study we aimed to define the prevalence of EIMs in a 25-year
follow up study in Hungarian IBD patients. We sought to determine if
any of the EIMs was more likely associated with CD or UC, with male
or female gender in a follow-up study. Possible associations between
EIMs and location and disease behaviour were also investigated.
MATERIALS
AND METHODS
Eight hundred and seventy-three IBD patients followed-up at the
Out- and Inpatient Gastroenterology Units of the Csolnoky F.
Province Hospital in Veszprem Province were enrolled. This hospital
is the secondary referral center for IBD patients in the province.
The
data of the 619 UC patients (male/female: 317/302) are summarized in
Table 1. The age at presentation varied between 9 and 80 years
(average: 38.3 years). Average disease duration was 11.2 years (1-56
years). The location of UC according to the known greatest extent
was proctitis in 117, left sided colitis in 304 (including 171
patients with proctosigmoiditis), subtotal (98) and pancolitis (100)
in 198 cases. Two hundred and fifty-four CD patients were included
(125 males, 129 females). Average age at presentation was 32.5 years
(12-80 years). According to the Vienna classification 192 patients
were classified as A1, while 62 as A2. Disease duration was 9.2
years (1-40 years). Location of CD was ileal (L1) in 60, colonic
(L2) in 81 and ileocolonic (L3) in 113 cases. Patients with upper GI
manifestation had lower GI disease as well and they were classified
according to their lower GI disease. According to the disease
behavior 83 of our CD patients were defined as non-stricturing
non-penetrating, 62 as stricturing and 105 as penetrating.
Fifty-eight patients of the 95 penetrating cases had parallel
strictures. Patients with indeterminate colitis were excluded.
Table
1 Clinical data of
IBD patients
| |
Ulcerative
colitis |
Crohn’s
disease |
| Number
of patients |
619 |
254 |
| Male/female |
317/302 |
125/129 |
| Mean
age at diagnosis |
38.3
yrs (9-80 yrs) |
32.5
yrs (12-80 yrs) |
| Location |
Proctitis:
117 |
L1:
60 |
| |
Left
sided colitis: 304 |
L2:
81 |
| |
Pancolitis:
198 |
L3:
113 |
| Behaviour
of CD |
- |
B1:
87 |
| |
|
B2:
62 |
| |
|
B3:
105 |
In
Crohn’s disease (CD). Location: L1: terminal ileum, L2: colonic,
L3: ileocolonic, behaviour: B1: non stricturing-non penetrating, B2:
stricturing, B3: penetrating.
Patients in remission were followed-up twice per year.
Patients who relapsed were followed-up or hospitalised according to
the actual disease activity. Special interest was dedicated to the
presence of EIM. Screening of EIMs was not performed, therefore the
number of EIMs may have been underestimated. Routine follow-up
consisted of assessment of patient’s complaints, physical
examination and laboratory testing.
Any
alteration suggesting an EIMs was investigated by a specialist. In
this study we did not assess the association between disease
activity and the presence of EIM. Major EIMs studied in this report
were axial and peripheral arthropathies (including ankylosing
spondylitis), aseptic femoral head necrosis, primary sclerosing
cholangitis (PSC), small duct cholangitis, autoimmune hepatitis,
erythema nodosum, pyoderma gangrenosum, chronic urticaria, acute
anterior uveitis, iritis, episcleritis, conjunctivitis, autoimmune
hemolytic anaemia (AIHA), immune thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP),
celiac disease, myositis, and glomerulonephritis.
Joint
involvements were classified as peripheral and/or axial
arthropathies. Peripheral arthropathies were divided into two
subgroups according to the classification of Orchard et al[13].
Type-1 arthritis is an acute self-limiting pauciarticular (less than
5 joints) arthropathy typically affecting large joints. It is
associated with other EIMs and its course parallels with the
activity of the bowel disease. In contrast, type 2 arthritis is a
chronic bilateral, symmetrical polyarticular arthropathy affecting
five or more small joints. Its course runs independently of the
course of the intestinal disease. Axial arthropathies are divided
into sacroileitis and ankylosing spondylitis (SPA). Its incidence is
20-times higher than that in the normal population[14].
Rheumatologists investigated sacroileitis and ankylosing spondylitis
cases. Laboratory testing (rheumatoid factor), X-ray and since 1997
MRI examinations were done.
Patients
with elevated liver function tests (LFT, aminotransferases,
cholestatic enzymes) were followed-up more cautiously. In patients
with chronic or progressive elevation of enzyme levels liver biopsy
and/or endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP)
examination was done if patient gave informed consent. The diagnosis
of PSC was based on elevated liver function tests, ERCP and
consistent histology findings. Small duct PSC was diagnosed if
histology suggested PSC, but ERCP could not verify the diagnosis[15,16].
Cholelithiasis, cirrhosis and focal nodular hyperplasia (FNH) were
excluded from hepatobiliary manifestations.
In
patients with verified thrombosis, blood samples were examined for
hypercoagulability including in almost all cases analysis of
plasminogen, proteins C and S activity and factor V Leiden mutation.
Patients with glomerulonephritis were followed-up by
nephrologists as well. Diagnosis was based on clinical and chemical
data and congruent histology findings. Ureteral obstruction was
diagnosed by cystoscopy and urography, CT or MRI. If the alteration
suggested fistulae in the urinary tract, cytography was also
performed.
Statistical
analysis
For statistical comparison of the data, Statistica 6.0 (Statsoft
Inc, USA) was used. Normality was tested by Shapiro-Wilk’s W test.
x2 test with Yates correction was used to compare groups
and odds ratios were calculated.
RESULTS
The prevalence of major (joint, hepatobiliary, ocular and
cutaneous) and all EIMs determined in this study are shown in Table
2. Major EIMs were apparent more frequently in CD than in UC (36.6 %
vs 15.0 %, P<0.001). EIMs were more frequent in patients
with a disease duration for more than 10 years in both CD (22.1 % vs
48.9 %, P=0.003) and UC (22.1 % vs 10.4 %, P<0.001).
Table
2 Prevalence of
extraintestinal manifestations (EIM) in IBD
|
Total
n (%) |
Disease
duration |
|
≤
10 yrs n (%) |
≤
10 yrs n (%) |
| IBD |
873 |
511 |
352 |
| Major
EIMs |
186
(21.3) |
86
(16.8) |
102
(30.0) |
| All
EIM signs |
547
(62.7) |
278
(54.4) |
269
(76.4) |
| Ulcerative
colitis |
619 |
357 |
262 |
| Major
EIMs |
93
(15.0) |
37
(10.4) |
58
(22.1) |
| All
EIM signs |
360
(58.2) |
167
(46.8) |
193
(73.7) |
| Crohn’s
disease |
254 |
164 |
90 |
| Major
EIMs |
93
(36.6) |
49
(29.9) |
44
(48.9) |
| All
EIM signs |
187
(73.6) |
111
(67.7) |
76
(84.4) |
The prevalence of EIMs was higher in CD except ocular
complications and PSC (P<0.001 for joint, hepatobiliary
and cutaneous manifestations, Tables 3 and 4). In general, EIMs were
more frequent in women except hepatobiliary manifestations and
arthropathies in UC patients.
All
major EIMs were more prevalent in more extensive UC (Table 5). There
was a tendency of increased frequency of joint manifestations in CD
patients with colonic involvement (L2 and L3: 23.7 %) compared to
patients with only ileal disease (18.3 %, P=NS, Table 5). The
prevalences of hepatobiliary, ocular and cutaneous manifestations
were not different according to disease location.
Table
3 Age at
presentation and prevalence of major extraintestinal manifestations
in patients with IBD
|
A1
n (%) |
A2
n (%) |
| UC
(n: 619) |
369 |
250 |
| Joint |
32
(8.7) |
20
(8.0) |
| Hepatobiliary |
49
(13.3) |
28
(11.2) |
| Cutaneous |
17
(4.6) |
7
(2.8) |
| Ocular |
11
(3.0) |
8
(3.0) |
| CD
(n: 254) |
192 |
62 |
| Joint |
48
(25.0) |
9
(14.5) |
| Hepatobiliary |
48
(25.0) |
9
(14.5) |
| Cutaneous |
20
(10.4) |
6
(9.7) |
| Ocular |
5
(2.6) |
3
(4.8) |
A1:
age at presentation <40 yrs, A2: age at presentation ≥40 yrs.
Table
4A Familial IBD and
association with extraintestinal manifestations
|
Total |
First
degree relative |
Second
degree relative |
| Ulcerative
colitis |
24/619 |
18
(14 UC+4 CD) |
6 (5 UC+1 CD) |
|
(3.9
%) |
(2.9
%) |
(1.0%) |
| Crohn’s
disease |
31/254 |
20
(3 UC+17 CD) |
11
(2 UC+9 CD) |
|
(12.2
%) |
(7.9%) |
(4.3%) |
Table
4B Familial IBD and
association with extraintestinal manifestations
|
Ulcerative
colitis |
Familial
IBD |
| Number
of patients |
619 |
24 |
| Joint |
52
(8.4 %) |
6
(25.0 %) |
| Hepatobiliary |
77
(12.4 %) |
3
(12.5 %) |
| Cutaneous |
24
(3.9 %) |
1
(4.2 %) |
| Ocular |
19
(3.0 %) |
2
(8.3 %) |
|
Crohn’s
disease |
Familial
IBD |
| Number
of patients |
254 |
31 |
| Joint |
57
(22.4 %) |
11
(35.5 %) |
| Hepatobiliary |
57
(22.4 %) |
4
(12.9 %) |
| Cutaneous |
26
(10.2 %) |
2
(6.5 %) |
| Ocular |
8
(3.1%) |
0 |
Table
5 Prevalence of
extraintestinal manifestations in ulcerative colitis and Crohn’s
disease according to location and disease behaviour
|
Joint
n (%) |
Hepatobiliary
n (%) |
Cutaneous
n (%) |
Ocular
n (%) |
| Location |
|
Ulcerative
colitis |
|
|
| Proctitis
(n=117) |
5
(4.3) |
9
(7.7) |
1
(0.9) |
1
(0.9) |
| Left
sided colitis (n=304) |
14
(4.6) |
32 (15.7) |
8
(2.6) |
7
(2.3) |
| Pancolitis
(n=198) |
33
(16.7) |
36 (18.2) |
15
(7.6) |
12
(6.1) |
| Location |
|
Crohn’s
disease |
|
|
| L1
(n=60) |
11
(18.3) |
14
(23.3) |
6
(10.0) |
2
(3.3) |
| L2
(n=81) |
17
(21.0) |
17
(21.0) |
10
(12.3) |
3
(3.7) |
| L3
(n=113) |
29
(25.7) |
26
(23.0) |
10
(8.8) |
3
(2.7) |
| Behaviour |
|
|
|
|
| B1
(n=87) |
13
(14.9) |
22
(25.3) |
11
(12.6) |
1
(1.1) |
| B2
(n=62) |
16
(25.8) |
11
(17.7) |
5
(8.1) |
0 |
| B3
(n=105) |
28
(27.6) |
24
(22.9) |
10
(9.5) |
7
(6.7) |
Age at presentation (A1: <40 years, A2: =40 years) did
slightly affect the prevalence of EIMs (Table 3). Joint
manifestations were more prevalent in CD patients with earlier
disease onset (OR: 1.96, 95 % CI: 1.01-4.21). The same tendency was
observed for cutaneous manifestations.
Familial
disease was seen in 3.9 % of patients with UC and 12.2 % of patients
with CD (Tables 4A-B). Joint manifestations were more frequent in UC
patients with familial disease (OR: 3.63, 95 % CI: 1.43-9.31) than
without. The same tendency was seen in UC patients (OR: 1.9, 95 %
CI: 0.87-4.14) and ocular
manifestations were found in familial UC cases.
Table
6A Joint
manifestations in IBD patients
| |
Total
n (%) |
Axial
arthritis
n (%) |
Type-1
arthritis
n (%) |
Type-2
arthritis
n (%) |
| Ulcerative
colitis |
|
|
|
|
| Total
(n=619) |
52
(8.4) |
20
(3.2) |
17
(2.7) |
13
(2.1) |
| Male
(n=317) |
24
(7.6) |
10
(3.2) |
7
(2.2) |
7
(2.2) |
| Female
(n=302) |
28
(9.3)* |
10 (3.4) |
10
(3.3) |
6
(2.0) |
| Crohn’s
disease |
|
|
|
|
| Total
(n=254) |
57
(22.4) |
26
(10.2) |
29
(11.4) |
8
(3.1) |
| Male
(n=125) |
23
(18.4) |
11
(8.8) |
12
(9.6) |
3
(2.4) |
| Female
(n=129) |
34
(26.4) |
15 (11.6) |
17
(13.2) |
5
(3.9) |
*Two
female patients with ulcerative colitis had rheumatoid arthritis.
Table
6B Joint
manifestations in IBD according to location and disease behaviour
|
Total
n (%) |
Axial
arthritis n
(%) |
Type-1
arthritis n
(%) |
Type-2 arthritis
n (%) |
| Location |
|
Ulcerative
colitis |
|
|
| Proctitis
(n=117) |
5 (4.3)* |
1
(0.9) |
2 (1.8) |
1
(0.9) |
| Left
sided colitis(n=304) |
14
(4.6) |
4
(1.3) |
5 (1.6) |
5
(1.6) |
| Pancolitis
(n=198) |
33
(16.7)* |
15
(7.6) |
10 (5.0) |
7
(3.5) |
| Location |
|
Crohn’s
disease |
|
|
| L1
(n=60) |
11
(18.3) |
5
(8.3) |
4
(6.7) |
2
(3.3) |
| L2
(n=81) |
17
(21.0) |
7
(8.6) |
10
(12.3) |
3 (3.7) |
| L3
(n=113) |
29
(25.7) |
14
(12.4) |
15
(13.3) |
3 (2.7) |
| Behaviour |
|
|
|
|
| B1
(n=87) |
13
(14.9) |
8
(9.2) |
5
(5.7) |
2
(2.3) |
| B2
(n=62) |
16
(25.8) |
8
(12.9) |
6
(9.7) |
3 (4.8) |
| B3
(n=105) |
28
(27.6) |
10
(9.5) |
18
(17.1) |
3 (2.9) |
*One
patient with proctitis and one with pancolitis had rheumatoid
athritis.
Joint manifestations were more frequent in CD than in UC (P<0.001,
Tables 6A-B.). There was a tendency of increased frequency of joint
manifestations in women with CD (26.4 % vs 18.4 %, OR: 1.58, 95 %
CI: 0.87-2.87). Axial arthritis (10.2 % vs 3.2 %, P=0.0001)
and type 1(11.4 % vs 2.7 %, P=0.0001) arthritis were more
frequent in CD, with equal prevalence of type-2 arthritis. In UC
joint manifestations were almost three-fold more frequent in
patients with pancolitis compared to proctitis and left sided
colitis cases (P<0.002 for both, Table 5). In CD a
tendency of increased frequency of joint manifestations was observed
in patients with colonic involvement (L2 and L3: 23.7 %) or
stricturing/penetrating disease (26.3 %) compared to patients with
ileal only disease (18.3 %) or non-stricturing non-penetrating
disease behavior (14.9 %, Table 6B). An increased frequency of type
1 arthritis was observed in patients with penetrating compared to
non-stricturing non-penetrating disease (P=0.028), the same
tendency was observed in patients with or without colonic
involvement. Type-1 arthritis affected more frequently the joints of
the lower extremities (most frequently the knee and ankle), while
type-2 arthritis was more common in the joints of the upper
extremities.
Hepatobiliary
manifestations are summerised in Table 7. PSC was diagnosed in 10
patients with UC and only 2 patients with CD. Small duct PSC was
diagnosed in 8 and 6 cases, respectively. Non-alcoholic fatty liver
disease (NAFLD) or non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) was
diagnosed in 9.4 % of UC patients and 19.3 % of CD patients (P<0.0001).
These patients had unexplained abnormal liver function tests (viral
hepatitis, autoimmune, drug or alcohol induced disease, extrahepatic
obstruction excluded). Liver biopsy was performed in 22/107 cases,
which identified NAFLD or NASH in almost all cases. US proved
hepatomegaly in 13/107 (12.1 %). Progression to cirrhosis was not
observed in these patients during follow-up.
Table
7 Hepatobiliary
manifestations in IBD patients
|
Total
n (%) |
PSC
n (%) |
Small duct PSC
n (%) |
NAFLD/ NASH n (%) |
| Ulcerative
colitis |
|
|
|
|
| Total
(n=619) |
77*
(12.4) |
10
(1.6) |
8
(1.3) |
58
(9.4) |
| Male
(n=317) |
39
(12.3) |
3
(1.0) |
6 (1.9) |
30
(9.5) |
| Female
(n=302) |
38*
(12.6) |
7
(2.3) |
2 (0.7) |
28
(9.3) |
| Crohn’s
disease |
|
|
|
|
| Total
(n=254) |
57
(22.4) |
2
(0.8) |
6 (2.4) |
49
(19.3) |
| Male
(n=125) |
27
(21.6) |
2
(1.6) |
6 (4.8) |
19
(15.2) |
| Female
(n=129) |
30
(23.3) |
0 |
0 |
30
(23.3) |
*One
female patient had autoimmune hepatitis. NAFLD: non-alcoholic fatty
liver disease, NASH: non-alcoholic steatohepatitis.
Cutaneous manifestations were seen in 10.2 % of the patients
with CD and 3.9 % of the patients with UC (Tables 8A-B). Cutaneous
manifestations were more common in women in both UC (male/female:
5.0 %/2.8 %) and CD (13.2 %/7.2 %, OR: 1.95, 95 % CI: 0.85-4.48).
Erythema nodosum and pyoderma gangrenosum were the most frequent
manifestations. In UC cutaneous manifestations were more frequent in
more extensive disease (7.6 % in pancolitis vs 2.1 % in proctitis or
left sided colitis, P=0.002).
Ocular
manifestations were apparent in approximately 3.0 % of UC and CD
patients (Table 9). The prevalence was more frequent in women in
both UC (P=0.009, OR: 4.37, 95 % CI: 1.51-12.6) and CD
(OR:3.0, 95 % CI=0.67-8). Conjunctivitis, acute anterior uveitis and
scleritis were the most frequent manifestations. Ocular
manifestations developed mostly during the early years of the
disease. In UC more than half of the patients with ocular
complication had pancolitis (6.1 % in pancolitis vs 1.9 % in left
sided colitis or proctitis, P=0.01).
Iron
deficiency anaemia was seen in 35.8 % of CD patients and in one
fourth of UC patients (Tables 10A-C). It was more frequent in women
in UC (32.1 % vs 19.6 %, P<0.001, OR=1.95, 95 % CI:
1.35-2.81). Chronic anaemia was more frequent in patients with CD
(9.6 % vs 17.7 %, P<0.001). The prevalence of macrocytic
anaemia was around 4 % in both diseases. It was also observed more
frequently in patients with ileocolonic disease than without it (P=0.03).
The same tendency was observed according to disease behaviour;
chronic anaemia tended to be more frequent in patients with
stricturing or penetrating disease (P=0.06, Table 10C). AIHA
developed in four UC patients.
Table
8A Cutaneous
manifestations in patients with ulcerative colitis (n=619)
| |
Total
n (%) |
Male
n (%) |
Female
n (%) |
| Erythema
nodosum |
8
(1.3) |
2 (0.6) |
6
(2.0) |
| Pyoderma
gangrenosum |
3
(0.5) |
1 (0.3) |
2
(0.6) |
| Chronic
urticaria |
6
(1.0) |
2
(0.6) |
4
(1.3) |
| Psoriasis |
3
(0.5) |
2
(0.6) |
1
(0.3) |
| Aphthous
stomatitis |
3 (0.5) |
1
(0.3) |
2
(0.6) |
| Herpes
zoster |
2
(0.3) |
1
(0.3) |
1
(0.3) |
| Cellulitis |
2
(0.3) |
0 |
2
(0.6) |
| Recurrent
dermatitis |
2
(0.3) |
1
(0.3) |
1
(0.3) |
| Lichen
ruber planus |
1
(0.2) |
1
(0.3) |
0 |
| Total |
24
(3.9) |
9
(2.8) |
15
(5.0) |
Table
8B Cutaneous
manifestations in patients with Crohn’s disese (n=254)
|
Total
n (%) |
Male
n (%) |
Female
n (%) |
| Erythema
nodosum |
14
(5.5) |
4
(3.1) |
10
(7.8) |
| Pyoderma
gangrenosum |
4 (1.6) |
3
(2.4) |
1
(0.8) |
| Erythema
exsudativum multiforme |
2
(0.8) |
1
(0.8) |
1
(0.8) |
| Erythroderma |
2
(0.8) |
1
(0.8) |
1
(0.8) |
| Stevens
Johnson syndrome |
1
(0.4) |
0 |
1
(0.8) |
| Psoriasis |
1
(0.4) |
0 |
1
(0.8) |
| Eczema |
1
(0.4) |
0 |
1
(0.8) |
| Recurrent
dermatitis |
1
(0.4) |
0 |
1
(0.8) |
| Total |
26
(10.2) |
9
(7.2) |
17
(13.2) |
Table
9 Ocular
manifestations in IBD patients
| |
Total
n (%) |
Anterior
uveitis n
(%) |
Conjunctivitis
n (%) |
Scleritis
n (%) |
| Ulcerative
colitis |
|
|
|
|
| Total
(n=619) |
20*
(3.2) |
6
(1.0) |
9 (1.5) |
4
(0.7) |
| Male
(n=317) |
4
(1.3) |
1
(0.3) |
3
(1.0) |
1
(0.3) |
| Female
(n=302) |
16
(5.3) |
5
(1.7) |
6
(2.0) |
3
(1.0) |
| Crohn’s
disease |
|
|
|
|
| Total
(n=254) |
8
(3.1) |
4 (1.6) |
4
(1.6) |
1 (0.4
) |
| Male
(n=125) |
2
(1.6) |
1 (0.8) |
0 |
1
(0.8) |
| Female
(n=129) |
6
(4.7) |
3
(2.3) |
4
(3.1) |
0 |
*One
orbital pseudotumor was observed in a young female UC patient.
Table
10A Hematological
manifestations in patients with ulcerative colitis
|
Total
n (%) |
Male
n (%) |
Female
n (%) |
| Iron
deficieny anaemia |
159 (25.9) |
62
(19.6) |
97
(32.1) |
| Chronic
anaemia |
59
(9.6) |
34
(10.7) |
25
(8.3) |
| Macrocytic
anaemia |
24
(3.9) |
15
(4.7) |
9
(3.0) |
| AIHA |
4
(0.6) |
2
(0.6) |
2
(0.6) |
| Non-Hodgkin
lymphoma |
1
(0.2) |
1
(0.3) |
0 |
| CML |
1
(0.2) |
1
(0.3) |
0 |
| Chronic
myeloproliferative disease |
1
(0.2) |
0 |
1
(0.3) |
| Leukemoid
reaction |
1
(0.2) |
0 |
1
(0.3) |
| Methaemoglobinaemia |
1
(0.2) |
0 |
1
(0.3) |
| Total |
260
(42.0) |
90
(28.4) |
170
(56.3) |
AIHA:
autoimmune hemolytic anaemia, CML: chronic myeloid leukaemia.
Table
10B Hematological
manifestations in patients with Crohn’s disease
|
Total
n (%) |
Male
n (%) |
Female
n (%) |
| Iron
deficieny anaemia |
91
(35.8) |
40
(32.0) |
51
(39.5) |
| Chronic
anaemia |
45 (17.7) |
23
(18.4) |
22
(17.1) |
| Macrocytic
anaemia |
11 (4.3) |
6
(4.8) |
5
(3.9) |
| Chronic
myeloproliferative disease |
1
(0.4) |
0 |
1
(0.8) |
| Leukopenia |
1
(0.4) |
0 |
1
(0.8) |
| ITP |
1
(0.4) |
0 |
1
(0.8) |
| Total |
150
(59.1) |
69
(55.2) |
81
(62.8) |
ITP:
immune thrombocytopenic purpura
Table
10C Association
between hematological complications and location and disease
behaviour in Crohn’s disease patients
|
Iron
deficieny anaemia n (%) |
Chronic anaemia n (%) |
Macrocytic anaemia n (%) |
| Location |
|
|
|
| L1
(n=60) |
17
(28.3) |
9
(15.0) |
3
(5.0) |
| L2
(n=81) |
22
(27.2) |
9
(11.1) |
2
(2.5) |
| L3
(n=113) |
42
(37.2) |
27
(23.9) |
6
(5.3) |
| Behaviour |
|
|
|
| B1
(n=87) |
27
(31.0) |
10
(11.4) |
2
(2.3) |
| B2
(n=62) |
23
(37.1) |
12
(19.4) |
3
(4.8) |
| B3
(n=105) |
41
(39.0) |
23
(21.9) |
6
(5.7) |
Thromboembolic complication was observed in 11 CD and 8 UC
patients (Table 11.). Male predominance was observed in UC, while it
was more frequent in women with CD, 1/15 (6.3 %) patient was
positive for factor V Leiden mutation.
4.5
% of all IBD patients had multiple major extraintestinal diseases,
three-fold more frequent in patients with CD than in patients with
UC (9.1 % vs 3.1 %, P<0.001, Table 12.). Rare
complications are summarized in Table 13. A relatively high number
of glomerulonephritis was worth mentioning.
Table
11 Thromboembolic
complications in patients with IBD
|
Ulcerative
colitis |
Crohn’s
disease |
| Number
of patients (%) |
11/619
(1.8) |
8/254
(3.1) |
| Male/female |
9/2 |
2/6 |
| Location |
Proctitis:
0 |
L1:
3 |
|
Left
sided colitis: 6 |
L2:
1 |
|
Pancolitis:
5 |
L3:
4 |
| Behaviour
of CD |
- |
B1:
0 |
|
|
B2:
2 |
|
|
B3:
6 |
| Place
of thromboembolism |
|
|
| Lower
extremity thrombosis |
8 |
4 |
| Pulmonary
embolism |
1 |
0 |
| Lower
extremity thrombosis |
2 |
3 |
| complicated
by |
|
|
| pulmonary
embolism |
|
|
| Splenic
vein thrombosis |
0 |
1 |
Table
12 Prevalence of
multiple extraintestinal diseases
| |
Total
n |
Ulcerative
colitis n |
Crohn’s
disease n |
| Two |
27 |
14 |
13 |
| Three |
14 |
5 |
9 |
| Four |
1 |
0 |
1 |
| Total |
42/873
(4.5%) |
19/619 (3.1%) |
23/254 (9.3%) |
Table
13 Extraintestinal
manifestations in IBD affecting other organ systems
| |
Total
n (%) |
Ulcerative colitis n (%) |
Crohn’s
disease n
(%) |
| Glomerulonephritis |
3
(0.4) |
1
(0.2) |
2
(0.8) |
| Asthma
bronchiale |
7
(0.8) |
4 (0.6) |
3
(1.2) |
| Chronic
pancreatitis |
4
(0.5) |
3
(0.5) |
1
(0.4) |
| Acute
pancreatitis |
2
(0.2) |
1
(0.2) |
1
(0.4) |
| Celiac
disease |
2
(0.2) |
1
(0.2) |
1
(0.4) |
| Thyreoiditis |
2
(0.2) |
2
(0.3) |
0 |
| SLE |
2
(0.2) |
1
(0.2) |
1
(0.4) |
SLE:
systemic lupus erythematodes.
DISCUSSION
It is difficult to define the true prevalence of EIMs in IBD. If
one was counting only major EIMs with common immunogenetic
background the prevalence was about 20-25 %[1,5,8,17,18].
However, if all possible secondary systemic effects and/or
complications of therapy are also included, then almost all patients
will have "extra-intestinal"
manifestations. Prevalence may vary depending on the actual
geographic area, IBD population, location and duration of the
disease, medication and diagnostic accuracy.
Only
few large cohort follow-up data are available on the prevalence of
EIMs in IBD. The study of Greenstein et al. was one of the
first reports[8]. Farmer et al.[19]
reported a prevalence of 16.7 % during a 13-year follow-up study.
EIMs were more prevalent in patients with colonic involvement or
previous operations. In the Swedish epidemiology study Monsen et
al.[20] excluded arthralgia, stomatitis and
episcleritis from the EIMs. More recently, Jiang and Cui[21]
analyzed the data of 10218 ulcerative colitis cases in China. The
frequency of EIMs was 6.1 %, however no further data were available
about the type of EIM. Bernstein et al.[22]
investigated the prevalence of five "major"
EIMs (iritis/uveis, PSC, pyoderma gangrenosum, erythema nodosum and
ankylosing spondylitis) with the help of the University of Manitoba
IBD Database in IBD patients with a disease history of at least 10
years. They found a single EIM prevalence of 6.2 %, which was one of
the lowest rates reported. However, peripheral arthropathies were
excluded from their study. There is undoubtedly a debate with the
diagnosis of peripheral arthopathy, as it is sometimes difficult to
distinguish arthropathy from arthralgia, especially in retrospective
studies. In contrast, it is one of the most typical EIMs, observed
in a high frequency of the patients. Excluding peripheral
arthropathy from EIMs in one study and including it in another make
the data difficult to compare. The reported overall EIM prevalence
of 21.3 % in our study is in concordance with previous studies. The
overall prevalence of EIMs was higher in patients with a longer
disease history, but age at presentation did not affect the
prevalence of EIMs.
There
were gender predilections. EIMs were more frequent in femal pateints
compared to males, which may support the hypothesis that autoimmune
diseases are more common in female subjects.
The role
of genetic factors has been implicated in the pathogenesis of IBD
and EIMs[8-11]. In our study we investigated the familial
occurrence in IBD. Positive family history was four times more
frequent in CD compared to UC. The frequencies of joint and ocular
manifestations were higher in patients with familial UC. Others have
suggested high concordance of the occurrence of EIMs in affected
siblings with IBD[23].
Previous
studies have suggested multiple extraintestinal diseases[8,22]
with certain genetic associations[10,23]. We found
multiple extraintestinal diseases in 4.5 % of IBD patients, more
common in patients with CD. The most frequent associations were
co-existing ocular, cutaneous and joint (type 1 arthritis)
manifestations. The Canadian study reported multiple extraintestinl
disease in only 0.3 % of all patients[22], however the
rate of multiple EIMs was comparable to our results in most studies[17,
19].
Relation
of EIMs with type,
location and behaviour of IBD
Type of IBD Overall
EIMs were more frequent in patients with CD than in patients with UC,
in concordance with previous studies[8,24] with the
exception of ocular manifestations and PSC. These two EIMs were
equally prevalent in CD and UC (both occurred approximately in 3 %
of the patiens) in concordance with previous data[10,16,25].
Location of IBD In
UC EIMs were thought to be more prevalent in extensive disease[5],
but there were some contradiction in the literature[13].
In our study the rate of EIMs increased with the increasing extent
of the disease. In CD it was generally accepted, that some EIMs were
associated with colonic (e.g. peripheral arthropathy) others with
small bowel (e.g. cholelithiasis) location[8,19]. We also
found that type-1 arthritis was twice as frequent in patients with
colonic or ileocolonic disease compared to patients with only ileal
disease. The difference was smaller compared to patients with axial
arthritis and disappeared in patients type 2 arthritis. The
prevalences of cutaneous, ocular and hepatobiliary manifestations
were not associated with location.
Behaviour of CD We
did not find data in the literature about the relation of EIMs and
the behaviour of CD, according to the Vienna classification. Earlier
studies have suggested that EIMs tended to associate with perianal
(=penetrating) disease[26]. We found a higher rate of
joint complications in stricturing and penetrating disease than in
non-stricturing non penetrating form. All but one ocular disease
developed in patients with penetrating disease, but the rate of
other complications was similar in the three groups.
Extraintestinal
manifestations according to affected organs
Arthritis is the most common EIM in IBD
IBD related arthropaties were originally classified as axial
and peripheral arthritides. Orchard et al. subdivided the
peripheral disease into type 1 (large joint, pauciarticular,
parallels with the course of IBD) and type-2 (small joint,
polyarticular, the course independent of IBD) arthritides[13].
In our study joint manifestations were more frequently seen in
patients with CD, first of all with the higher prevalence of axial
and type-1 arthritis in these patients. Type-1 arthritis was more
frequent in patients with stenosing and penetrating disease compared
to patients with non-stenosing non-penetrating disease behaviour. In
patients with penetrating disease bacterial infections could explain
the high prevalence, the reason for the high prevalence in patients
with stenosing disease is not clear, perhaps it has a genetic
background.
Hepatobiliary complications
PSC was diagnosed in 1.6 % in UC and even more infrequently
in CD. When small duct PSC was included, the overall prevalence was
2.9-3.2 % in both diseases, in concordance with the majority of
previous reports (2.4-11 %)[15,16,27]. PSC was a
precancerosus condition with increased risk for cholangiocarcinoma
and colorectal cancer[28]. In this study 3 patients with PSC and one
patient with small duct cholangitis developed colorectal cancer and
one PSC patient developed cholangiocarcinoma, which supports a role
for more intensive follow-up in these subgroups of patients.
The
cause of elevated LFT was found to be steatosis and/or
steatohepatitis, reported in 6.3 % in UC and in 4 % in CD in
previous studies[29,30]. An Italian study found that 12 %
of the 474 asymptomatic IBD patients had hepatobiliary disease[31].
In non-selected or operated UC patients the prevalence of steatosis
could be as high as 15-45 %[16,32,33]. In our study the
rate of NAFLD was twice as high in CD than in UC, otherwise our data
are in concordance with the data of previous studies.
Several cutaneous diseases were diagnosed, 14 were classified as EIM.
Cutaneous manifestations were more frequent in CD and in female
patients. The prevalence of erythema nodosum and pyoderma
gangrenosum was in the range previously reported[10,34,35]
with very few psoriasis cases.
Ocular
complications were equally frequent in both diseases with increased
prevalence in women. Anterior uveitis was found at a frequency as
previously reported[8,10,22]. We found one orbital
pseudotumour in a young woman with severe ulcerative pancolitis.
Ocular manifestations occurred mostly in the early few years after
diagnosis. Pancolitis patients with UC were more liable to develop
ocular manifestations compared to other locations. Ocular
manifestations did frequently occur together with other (joint or
cutaneous) extraintestinal diseases.
Haematological complications
Iron deficiency anaemia is the most frequent hematological
manifestation. In most of the cases its course ran parallel to the
course of the intestinal disease. "Chronic
anaemia" that occurs in inflammatory conditions and tumours was
mostly apparent in severe, refractory cases and resolved only slowly
after remission. Macrocytic anaemia was more frequent in patients
with ileal and penetrating/stricturing disease than in patients with
colonic involvement or non-stricturing non-penetrating disease. It
was less frequent since preventive folate supplementation has been
introduced in patients receiving sulfasalazine treatment.
Autoimmune
haemolytic anaemia (AIHA) rarely complicates IBD, the reported
prevalence rates were between 0.2 % and 1.7 %. Our observed rate
(0.6 %) correlated with the previous data. In concordance with other
studies AIHA occurred in patients with extensive colitis. In most of
the cases AIHA could be treated successfully with steroids and/or
immunosuppressive drugs[36]. In our study one patient
required splenectomy, and in another case haemolysis subsided only
after colectomy.
Increased
risk of lymphoma has been reported in IBD, especially in patients
receiving immunosupressives, but data were conflicting[37,38].
Our data do not support the notion of increased risk in these
patients. In our series one 76-year old male UC patient with left
sided colitis developed a high grade B-cell lymphoma in the rectum,
but he did not receive immunosuppressive therapy. ITP might be true
EIM, methaemoglobinaemia was associated with high dose sulfasalazine
treatment, leukaemoid reaction was seen in a fulminant relapse.
Hypercoagulability
was thought to be involved in the pathogenesis of IBD[39-41],
and increased risk of thromboembolic complications (1-6 %) has been
reported in IBD[42]. The prevalence of prothrombotic
inherited and/or acquired coagulation abnormalities in patients with
IBD remains controversial. Genetic thrombophilia with deficiencies
in some coagulation inhibitors (antithrombin, proteins C and S),
acquired thrombophilia due to inflammation, antiphospholipid
syndrome and mutations of factor V Leiden and recently other genes
involved in thrombogenesis (prothrombin mutation 20210A or factor V
fV4070G polymorphism) have been described[39,43]. The
most common cause of hypercoagulability status in Europe is
resistance to activated protein C (APC). Resistance to APC and
mutations that cause APC resistance (mainly factor V Leiden) have
been of particular interest[42,43]. Some studies reported
increased frequency of Leiden mutation in IBD[42],
however others found that Leiden mutation was associated with
thromboembolism with (14.3 %) or without IBD (15.5 %) but not with
IBD (0 % and controls 3.6 %) itself [39,44]. In our study
Leiden mutation was infrequent in IBD patients with thrombosis. The
frequency was the same that as observed in normal Hungarian
population without thrombosis (5.26 %)[45]. Most
thromboembolic episodes developed in the lower extremities, in some
patient with pulmonary embolism as a complication. Thrombosis of the
splenic vein occurred in one young female CD patient with
ileocolonic disease.
Other EIMs Glomerulonephritis
is a rare complication in IBD. Only case reports could be found in
the literature[46]. Deposition of immune-complexes is
thought to be involved in the pathogenesis. Finding 3 patients (1 UC
and 2 CD) in this series was an unexpected high number. Histology
revealed IgA nephropathy, membranous glomerulonephritis and focal
glomerulosclerosis. Ductal changes suggesting chronic pancreatitis
were common in IBD[47]. Our two pancreatitis cases
developed in patients taking azathioprine.
In
conclusion, in IBD a variety of EIMs may occur during the course of
the disease affecting several organ systems. In Hungarian IBD
patients, major EIMs develop in concordance with previous European
data in approximately one fifth of the patients. The high number of
EIMs supports a role for complex follow-up in these patients.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
Dr. Zsuzsanna Erdelyi, Dr. Agnes Horvath, Dr Gabor Mester (Veszprem),
Dr. Sandor Meszaros (Ajka), Dr. Csaba Molnar (Ajka), Dr. Mihály
Balogh (Papa) and Dr. Istvan Szipocs for help in data collection and
to Gabriella Demenyi for technical assistance.
REFERENCES
1
Podolsky DK. Inflammatory bowel disease. NEJM
2002; 347: 417-428
2
Farrell RJ, Peppercorn MA. Ulcerative colitis. Lancet 2002;
359: 331-340
3
Lakatos L. Immunology of inflammatory bowel diseases. Acta
Physiol Hung 2000; 87: 355-372
4
Fiocchi C. Inflammatory bowel disease: etiology and
pathogenesis. Gastroenterology 1998; 115: 182-205
5
Weiss A, Mayer L. Extraintestinal manifestations of
inflammatory bowel disease. In: Allan RN, Rhodes JM, Hanauer
SB, eds. Inflammatory bowel diseases.
Churchill Livingstone, New York 1997: 623-636
6
Lamers CB. Treatment of extraintestinal complications of
ulcerative colitis. Eur J Gastroenterol
Hepatol 1997; 9: 850-853
7
Ljung T, Staun M, Grove O, Fausa O, Vatn MH, Hellstrom PM.
Pyoderma gangrenosum associated with Crohn
disease: effect of TNF-alpha blokade
with infliximab. Scand J Gastroenterol 2002; 37: 1108-1110
8
Greenstein AJ, Janowitz HD, Sachar DB. The extra-intestinal
complications of Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis:
a study of 700 patients. Medicine
1976; 55: 401-412
9
Orchard TR. Arthritis associated with inflammatory bowel
disease. In: Bayless TM, Hanauer SB, eds. Advanced therapy
of inflammatory bowel disease. Decker
inc., Hamilton 2001: 279-282
10
Orchard TR, Chua CN, Ahmad T, Cheng H, Welsh KI, Jewell DP.
Uveitis and erythema nodosum in inflammatory
bowel disease: clinical features and
the role of HLA genes. Gastroenterology 2002; 123: 714-718
11
Roussomoustakaki M, Satsangi J, Welsh K, Louis E, Fanning G,
Targan S, Landers C, Jewell DP. Genetic markers
may predict disease behavior in
patients with ulcerative colitis. Gastroenterology 1997; 112:
1845-1853
12
D'Arienzo
A, Manguso F, Scarpa R, Astarita C, D扐rmiento
FP, Bennato R, Gargano D, Sanges M, Mazzacca G.
Ulcerative colitis, seronegative
spondyloarthropathies and allergic diseases: the search for a link.
Scand J
Gastroenterol 2002; 37: 1156-1163
13
Orchard TR, Wordsworth BP, Jewell DP. Peripheral
arthropathies in inflammaroty bowel disease: their articular
distribution and natural history. Gut
1998; 42: 387-391
14
Russell AS. Arthritis, inflammatory bowel disease and
histocompatibility antigens. Ann Int Med 1977; 86: 820-821
15
Lee YM, Kaplan MM. Management of primary sclerosing
cholangitis. Am J Gastroenterol 2002; 97: 528-534
16
Heikius B, Niemela S, Lehtola J, Karttunen T, Lahde S.
Hepatobiliary and coexisting pancreatic duct abnormalities
in patients with inflammatory bowel
disease. Scand J Gastroenterol 1997; 32: 153-161
17
Rankin GB, Watts HD, Melnyk CS, Kelley ML Jr. The National
Cooperative Crohn’s Disease Study:
Extraintestinal manifestations and
perianal complications. Gastroenterology 1979; 77: 914-920
18
Rankin GB. Extraintestinal and systecim manifestations of
inflammatory bowel disease. Med Clin North
Am 1990; 74: 39-50
19
Farmer RG, Whelan G, Fazio VW. Long-term follow-up of
patients with Crohn’s disease. Gastroenterology
1985; 88: 1818-1825
20
Monsen U, Sorstad J, Hellers G, Johannson C. Extracolonic
diagnoses in ulcerative colitis: an epidemiological study.
Am J Gastroenterol 1990; 85: 711-716
21
Jiang XL, Cui HF. An analysis of 10218 ulcerative colitis
cases in China. World J Gastroenterol 2002; 8: 158-161
22
Bernstein CN, Blanchard JF, Rawsthorne P, Yu N. The
prevalence of extraintestinal diseases in inflammatory
bowel disease: A population-based
study. Am J Gastroenterol 2001; 96: 1116-1122
23
Satsangi J, Grootscholten C, Holt H, Jewell DP. Clinical
patterns of familial inflammatory bowel disease.
Gut 1996; 38: 738-741
24
Danzi JT. Extraintestinal manifestations of idiopathic
inflammatory bowel disease. Arch Int Med 1988; 148: 297-302
25
Lee YM, Kaplan MM. Management of primary sclerosing
cholangitis. Am J Gastroenterol 2002; 97: 528-534
26
Rankin GB. Extraintestinal and systemic manifestations of
inflammatory bowel disease. Med Clin North
Am 1990; 74: 39-50
27
Olsson R, Danielsson A, Jarnerot G, Lindstrom E, Loof L,
Rolny P, Ryden BO, Tysk C, Wallerstedt S. Prevalence of
primery sclerosing cholangitis in
patients with ulcerative cholitis. Gastroenterology 1991; 100:
1319-1323
28
Loftus EV, Sandborn WJ, Tremaine WJ, Mahoney DW, Zinsmeister
AR, Offord KP, Melton LJ 3rd. Risk of
colorectal neoplasa in patients with
primary sclerosing cholangitis. Gastroenterology 1996; 110: 432-440
29
Perrett AD, Higgins G, Johnston HH, Massarella G, Truelove
SC, Wrigth R. The liver in ulcerative colitis. Q J
Med 1971; 40: 211-238
30
Perrett AD, Higgins G, Johnston HH, Massarella G, Truelove
SC, Wrigth R. The liver in Crohn’s disease. Q J
Med 1971; 40: 187-209
31
Riegler G, D'Inca
R, Sturniolo C, Corrao G, Blancho CDV, Di Leo V, Carratu R, Ingrosso
M, Pelli MA, Morini S,
Valpiani D, Cantarini D, Usai P, Papi
C, Caprilli R. Hepatobiliary alterations in patients with
inflammatory bowel
disease: A multicenter study. Scand J
Gastroenterol 1998; 33: 93-98
32
Broome U, Glaumann H, Hultcrantz R. Liver histology and
follow-up of 68 patients with ulcerative colitis and normal
liver function tests. Gut 1990; 31:
468-472
33
Mattila J, Aitola P, Matikainen M. Liver lesions found at
colectomy in ulcerative colitis: correlation between
histological findings and biochemical
parameters. J Clin Pathol 1994; 47: 1019-1021
34 Noussari HC, Provost
TT, Anhalt GJ. Cutaneous manifestations of inflammatory bowel
disease. In: Bayless TM,
Hanauer SB, eds. Advanced therapy of
inflammatory bowel disease. Decker inc, Hamilton 2001: 271-274
35
Tromm A, May D, Almus E, Voigt E, Greving I, Schwegler U,
Griga T. Cutaneous manifestations in inflammatory
bowel disease. Z Gastroenterol 2001;
39: 137-144
36
Giannadaki E, Potamianos S, Poussomoustakaki M, Kyriakou D,
Fragkiadakis N, Manousos ON. Autoimmune
hemolytic anemia and positive Coombs
test associated with ulcerative colitis. Am J Gastroenterol
1997;92:1872-1874
37
Lewis JD, Bilker WB, Brensinger C, Deren JJ, Vaughn DJ, Strom
BL. Inflammatory bowel disease is not associated with
an increased risk of lymphoma.
Gastroenterology 2001; 121: 1080-1087
38
Lewis JD, Schwartz JS, Lichtenstein GR. Azathioprine for
maintenance of remission in Crohn’s disease: benefits
outweigh the risk of lymphoma.
Gastroenterology 2000; 118: 1018-1024
39
Guedon C, Le Cam-Duchez V, Lalaude O, Menard JF, Lerebours E,
Borg JY. Prothrombotic inherited abnormalities
other than factor V Leiden mutation
do not play a role in inflammatory bowel disease. Am J Gastroenterol
2001; 96: 1448-1454
40
Meucci G, Pareti F, Vecchi M, Saibeni S, Bressi C, de
Franchis R. Serum von Willebrand factor levels in patients
with inflammatory bowel disease are
related to systemic inflammation. Scand J Gastroenterol 1999; 34:
287-290
41
Collins CE, Cahill MR, Newland AC, Rampton DS. Platelets
circulate in an activated state in inflammatory bowel
disease. Gastroenterology 1994; 106:
840-845
42
Liebman HA, Kashani N, Sutherland D, McGehee W, Kam AL. The
factor V Leiden mutation increases the risk of
venous thrombosis in patients with
inflammatory bowel disease. Gastroenterology 1998; 115: 830-834
43
Haslam N, Standen GR, Probert CS. An investigation of the
association of the factor V Leiden mutation and
inflammatory bowel disease. Eur J
Gastroenterol Hepatol 1999; 11: 1289-1291
44
Grip O, Svensson PJ, Lindgren S. Inflammatory bowel disease
promotes venous thrombosis earlier in life. Scand
J Gastroenterol 2000; 35: 619-623
45
Nagy Z, Nagy A, Karadi O, Figler M, Rumi G Jr, Suto G, Vincze
A, Par A, Mozsik G. Prevalence of the factor V
Leiden mutation in human inflammatory
bowel disease with different activity. J Physiol Paris 2001; 95:
483-487
46
Pardi DS, Tremaine WJ, Sandborn WJ, McCarthy JT. Renal and
urologic complications of inflammatory bowel disease.
Am J Gastroenterol 1998; 93: 504-514
47
Barthet M, Hastier P, Bernard JP, Bordes G, Frederick J,
Allio S, Mambrini P, Saint-Paul MC, Delmont JP, Salducci
J, Grimaud JC, Sahel J. Chronic
pancreatitis and inflammatory bowel disease: true or coincidental
association?
Am J Gastroenterol 1999; 94:
2141-2148
Edited
by Wang
XL
| |