Search Article Keyword:  
PubMed Submission Abstarct PDF Cited  Click Count: 93 DownLoad Count: 26 

ISSN 1007-9327 CN 14-1219/R  World J Gastroenterol  2003 September;9(9):2083-2087

Gene transfer and expression of enhanced green fluorescent protein in variant HT-29c cells

Min Wang, Lars Boenicke, Bradley D. Howard, Ilka Vogel, Holger Kalthoff


Min Wang, Department of Surgical Oncology, First Affiliated Hospital of Medical College, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310003, Zhejiang Province, China
Lars Boenicke, Bradley D. Howard, Ilka Vogel, Holger Kalthoff, Molecular Oncology Research Laboratory, Clinic for General and Thoracic Surgery, Christian-Albrechts-University, 24105 Kiel, Germany
Supported by the Scientific Research Foundation for Returned Overseas Chinese Scholars, Personnel Affairs Bureau of Zhejiang Province
Correspondence to: Dr. Min Wang, Department of Surgical Oncology, First Affiliated Hospital of Medical College, Zhejiang University, 79# Qingchun Road, Hangzhou 310003, Zhejiang Province, China.  pfeng@mail.hz.zj.cn
Telephone: +86-571-7236880    Fax: +86-571-7236628
Received: 2003-01-18    Accepted: 2003-03-10

Abstrac
AIM: To study the expression of enhanced green fluorescent protein (EGFP) gene in retrovirally transduced variant HT-29 cells.

METHODS: The retroviral vector prkat EGFP/neo was constructed and transfected into the 293T cell using a standard calcium phosphate precipitation method. HT-29c cells (selected from HT-29 cells) were transduced by a retroviral vector encoding the GEFP gene. The fluorescence intensity of colorectal carcinoma HT-29c cells after transduced with the EGFP bearing retrovirus was visualized using fluorescence microscope and fluorescence activated cell sorter (FACS) analysis. Multiple biological behaviors of transduced cells such as the proliferating potential and the expression of various antigens were comparatively analyzed between untransduced and transduced cells in vitro. EGFP expression of the fresh tumor tissue was assessed in vivo.

RESULTS: After transduced, HT-29c cells displayed a stable and long-term EGFP expression under the nonselective conditions in vitro. After cells were successively cultured to passage 50 in vitro, EGFP expression was still at a high level. Their biological behaviors, such as expression of tumor antigens, proliferation rate and aggregation capability were not different compared to untransduced parental cells in vitro. In subcutaneous tumors, EGFP was stable and highly expressed.

CONCLUSION: An EGFP expressing retroviral vector was used to transduce HT-29c cells. The transduced cells show a stable and long-term EGFP expression in vitro and in vivo. These cells with EGFP are a valuable tool for in vivo research of tumor metastatic spread.

Wang M, Boenicke L, Howard BD, Vogel I, Kalthoff H. Gene transfer and expression of enhanced green fluorescent protein in variant HT-29c cells. World J Gastroenterol  2003; 9(9): 2083-2087
http://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/9/2083.asp

INTRODUCTION
The detection of tumor invasion and micrometastasis in fresh tissues is necessary for critical understanding of tumor progression and its control. The real-time visualization of tumor cells, micrometastasis and their progression during the course of the disease is not easy to study in current models of metastasis. The green fluorescent protein (GFP) from the jellyfish Aequorea victoria has attracted widespread interest and has become an important reporter gene since heterologous expression of the cloned gene was found to be able to generate striking green fluorescence[1,2]. GFP is a relatively small polypeptide consisting of 238 amino acid residues, and is able to produce green fluorescence when excited with a blue light. So far, it has been used as a reporter of gene expression, tracers of cell lineage, and fusion tags to monitor protein localization within living cells in a broad spectrum of model organisms[3]. No additional substrates are required to detect GFP and it can be monitored in living cells. But the sensitivity of wild type GFP is below that of standard reporter proteins, such as b-galactosidase, which utilizes enzymatic amplification. Wild type GFP exhibits lower fluorescence intensity which is hard to detect in several mammalian cells[4]. To improve the detection of GFP in transduced mammalian cells, a unique GFP variant, which contains a chromophore mutation making the protein 35 times brighter than wild type GFP, and is codon-optimized for high level expression in mammalian cells has been constructed[5,6]. These changes in the GFP coding sequence provide an enhanced GFP (EGFP) that greatly increases the sensitivity of the reporter protein[7, 8].
     GFP has demonstrated its potential for use as a marker for gene expression in a variety of cell types[9,10]. Numerous studies have proven the usefulness of GFP as a reporter molecule in the setting of transient gene expression[11,12]. However, it remains unclear whether colorectal carcinoma cell lines are able to stably express and maintain high level of EGFP expression over many passages in the absence of selective growth conditions. In this study, we assessed the expression of colorectal carcinoma cells after transduced with EGFP gene, and evaluated their biological behaviors in vitro. Moreover, to develop an experimental animal model of colorectal carcinoma that improves the visualization of fresh tissue, we injected EGFP-expressing human colorectal carcinoma cells subcutaneously into rats. This model involves the stable transduction of HT-29c tumor cells in vitro with the EGFP gene that could be stably and highly expressed in vivo.

MATERIALS AND METHODS
Materials
Cell lines and cell culture
  HT-29 cell line, a gift of Dr. Dippold (Mainz, Germany), was established from a human colon adenocarcinoma with moderate differentiation, HT-29c with increased metastatic activity was a variant cell line after three cycles of selection of liver metastases from injected HT-29 cells[13]. All cell lines were grown in 75 cm2 cluture flasks in RPMI-1640 medium supplemented with 10 % fetal bovine serum, 2 mM L-glutamine and 1 mM sodium pyruvate (Life Technologies) in a humidified atmosphere of 5 % CO2  and 95 % air at a 37 °C incubator (Heraeus, Germany).
Plasmids  For subcloning the HSV-TK gene and modifying the restriction sites on the 5 and 3 ends, the pSP72 cloning vector was obtained from Promega Corp., Madison, WI. The gene coding for humanized EGFP of Aequorea victoria contained in the plasmid pEGFP-C was obtained from Clontech Laboratories (Heidelberg, Germany). prkat, a retroviral vector backbone derived from the Moloney murine leukemia virus (MMLV) was provided by Cell Genesys Corp. The expression vector for the vesicular stomatitis virus G protein, pCMV VSV-G, was generously provided by Dr. Ted Friedman.
Construction of retroviral vector  General molecular biological cloning techniques and the necessary solutions used to generate this plasmid vector were found in standard protocols[14]. A 0.7 kb EcoR I/BamH I fragment containing the coding region of EGFP gene was isolated and ligated into the prkat to generate prkat EGFP/neo. In this construct, the MMLV long terminal repeat (LTR) controled the expression of EGFP gene and an internal IRES sequence drived the expression of the neomycin resistance marker.
Experimental animal  Three-week-old male athymic Rowett nude rats (Hsd: RH-nu/nu) were obtained from Harlan/Winkelmann (Borchen, Germany). All the rats were housed in cages with filter bonnet under special pathogen-free conditions in a laminar flow cabinet (EHRET, DIPL.-ING. W. EHRET GmbH, Germany) at constant temperature (24-26 °C), humidity (40-50 %) and 12-hour light/12-hour dark cycle. The rats were fed on standard rat food (Altromin, Lage/Lippe, Germany) and water ad libitum. Operative equipments, all cages and bedding were autoclaved at 121 °C for 30 minutes. All animal manipulations were done aseptically in a transverse laminar flow hood (BDK, Luft-und Reinraumtechnik GmbH, Germany).

Methods
Production of retrovirus particles and transduction of HT-29c cells with rkat EGFP/neo retroviruses
  1.5×106 293T cells were seeded onto 10 cm2 PrimariaTM dishes. The next day, fresh medium was added 4 hours prior to transduction. 10
mg of prkat EGFP/neo, 5 mg of prkat gag/pol and 5 mg pCMV-VSV were co-transfected into the 293T cells using a standard calcium phosphate precipitation method. 24 hours later fresh medium (DMEM high glucose with 10 % FCS plus 2 mM glutamine, 1 mM sodium pyruvate and 1X non essential amino acids) was added. 48 hours after the cells were washed, the supernatant containing VSV-G pseudotyped recombinant retroviruses was harvested from the plate and filtered using a 0.45 mm low protein binding AcrodiscTM filter (Gelman Sciences, Ann Arbor, MI). 3 ml of the retroviral supernatant was then added to a 6 cm2 dish seeded with 1×105 HT-29c cells containing 8 mg/ml polybrene. 24 hours later, the transduced HT-29c cells were placed under geneticin (G418, Life Technologies) selection (700 mg/ml). After two weeks, individual clones were generated by limited dilution. 96 well plates were seeded using cell densities of 3, 5 and 10 cells per well. Within 3-4 weeks, 12 separate clones were generated and expanded into 6 well plates. To analyze the expression of EGFP in the individual clones, 5105 cells from each clone were fixed in 2 % formaldehyde and the fixed cells were analyzed by FACS. The two clones with the most intense fluorescence, HT-29cEGFPclone #1 and #7 were selected and used for in vitro or in vivo studies.
Cell culture of transduced HT-29c cells  HT-29cEGFP, HT-29cEGFPclone#1 and clone#7 cells were grown in supplemented RPMI-1640 medium. The cultures were incubated at 37 °C in a humidified atmosphere of 5 % CO2. G418 was added to cell medium at a final concentration of 600 mg/ml from first till 15th passage for selection. After passage 15, the cells were grown in the absence of G418 and cells were passaged twice per week.
Microscopic and FACS analysis of EGFP expressing cells in vitro  HT-29c EGFPclone#1 and clone#7 cells were seeded onto chamber slides. When cells grown in monolayer became confluent, the fluorescence of the cells were visualized with an Axioskop fluorescence microscope (Carl Zeiss, Germany) equipped with a FITC filter set (UV light exciter BP 546 nm, FT 580 nm, emitter LP 590 nm). Cultivated cells were harvested by trypsinization and were fixed in 0.4 ml 2 % formaldehyde. The fluorescence intensity of samples was analyzed using fluorescence activated cell sorter (FACS, Epics XL, Hamburg, Germany).
Comparative analysis of biological behavior between transduced and untransduced cell lines in vitro  Growth rate determination: HT-29, HT-29c, HT-29c EGFPclone#1 and clone#7 cells were seeded in six-well plastic culture plates, in triplicate at a density of 1105 in supplemented medium. The cells were harvested by trypsinization and counted every 24 hours using a hemocytometer. The test was repeated three times. The mean number of cells in each interval for each cell line was determined. The growth curve of each cell line was constructed. The doubling time of tumor cell growth was calculated from the cell growth curve over 5 days according to the formula: Doubling time=(T2-T1) In 2/(In N2-In N1), in which N1 and N2 are the number of tumor cells at time points of T1 and T2, respectively.
     Three-dimensional spheroid culture of cell lines: Three-dimensional spheroid culture of HT-29c and HT-29cEGFPclone cells were performed as follows: six-well culture plates were pre-coated with 2 ml 1% (w/v) agarose gel/per well. The single-cell suspension containing 1×105 tumor cells in supplemented medium was seeded onto each well and incubated in a humidified 5 % CO2 at a 37 °C incubator. Cell aggregation was monitored daily using a phase-contrast microscope (Carl Zeiss, Germany).
     Expression of different antigens: Cells were seeded onto 10-well mask slides and incubated for 48 hours as described above. Cells on the slides were fixed in cold acetone (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) for 5 minutes. Immunohistochemical staining (IHC) was performed using the standard ABC method with VECTASTAIN ABC-kit and monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) KL-1 (Keratin), IT-ks20.10 (Cytokeratin 20), C1P83 (CEA), CA19-9 (CA19-9), MiB-1 (Ki-67) and Do7 (p53). All mAbs were commercially available except for C1P83 which was provided by Prof. Kalthoff H. The percentage of positive tumor cells was determined by calculating 1 000 tumor cells in 5 random vision fields of one section under microcope.
EGFP expression of HT-29c cells in vivo  All the rats were stabilized for one week in the laboratory before the experiments. 0.5 ml single-cell suspension containing 2×107 cells of HT-29cEGFPclone#7 was injected subcutaneously into both flanks of the rat. The rat was monitored daily. When the tumor reached 15 mm in diameter, the rat was killed. The fresh tumor tissues were sliced at 0.7-1.0 mm thickness and sliced at 60
mm cryosections, then observed directly under the fluorescence microscope.

Statistical analysis
Statistical analyses were performed using the F test.

RESULTS
Expression of EGFP in transduced HT-29c cells in vitro
HT-29c cells could be transduced by retroviral vector with EGFP and then selected in G418. Transduced HT-29c cells with EGFP (HT-29cEGFP, HT-29c EGFPclone#1 and clone#7) were grown in vitro in G418 (600
mg/ml). Untransduced HT-29c cells did not survive in G418, suggesting all cells within the transduced pools contained at least one copy of a transcriptionally active neomycin phosphotransferase gene. Under fluorescence microscope, the selected neomycin-resistant HT-29cEGFP and HT-29cEGFPclone cells all displayed strong fluorescence (Figure 1). HT-29cEGFPclone cells exhibited stronger fluorescence than HT-29cEGFP cells, no significant difference was found between fluorescence levels of HT-29cEGFPclone#1 and clone#7 cells by FACS analysis (Table 1). After 8 weeks in culture, G418 was removed from the growth medium. The expression of EGFP fluorescence of HT-29cEGFP clone cells was still stable for over six months in vitro. No significant difference was found between passage 5 and passage 50 of HT-29cEGFPclone#1 in fluorescence intensity by FACS (Table 2).

Figure 1  Stable high level of EGFP expression of transduced HT-29c EGFP clone cells in vitro. 100.

Table 1  FACS analysis of EGFP expression in cell lines

Cell lines Fluorescence intensity
HT-29c 2.5±0.9a
HT-29cEGFP pool 64.6±7.4b
HT-29cEGFPclone#1 206.5±39.9c
HT-29cEGFPclone#7 203.4±46.4d

The fluorescence intensity refers to fluorescence of 10 000 cells according to standard software supplied by the FACS cytometer manufacturer. a: P<0.001 vs b, c or d, respectively. b: P<0.001 vs c or d, c: P=0.818 vs d.

Table 2  EGFP expression in different passages of transduced HT-29c cells by FACS

Clone #1 Fluorescence intensity
Passage      5 217.8
Passage    17 198.1
Passage    31 193.4
Passage    40 212.1
Passage    50 208.8

Table 3  Doubling times of parental HT-29 cells and EGFP transduced HT-29 cells

Cell line Doubling time (h)a
HT-29 25.3±5.5
HT-29c 26.0±3.3
HT-29cEGFPclone #1 26.3±4.7
HT-29cEGFPclone #7 27.7±5.3

a: F test F=0.62, P>0.05.

Comparison of biological behavior between untransduced and transduced cells in vitro
Comparison of cell proliferation rate  The results indicated that there was no significant difference in the cell proliferation rates of parental cells and selected transfectants as determined by comparing their doubling time (Table 3).

Table 4  Phenotypical comparison of HT-29cells, HT-29c cells and EGFP transduced cells

mAb Percentage of positive cells (%)
HT-29 T-29c HT-29c EGFPclone
KL-1 100 100 100
IT- Ks20.10 100 100 100
C1 83 33.9 34.6 36.5
CA19-9 48.0 49.3 47.2
MiB-1 96.7 97.8 97.2
Do-7 96.8 97.1 98.3

Figure 2  Stable high level of EGFP expressing s.c. tumor in nude rats formed from HT-29c EGFP clone#7 cells under fluorescence microscope (a: the tumor tissue was sliced at 0.8 mm, b: 60 mm cryosection). ×100.
Figure 3  Immunostaining of the s.c. tumor with mAb KL-1 (c) ×100.

Comparison of aggregation potential  To compare cell aggregation potential between untransfected and transfected cells in vitro, HT-29c and HT-29cEGFPclone cells were monitored under three dimensional culture conditions. At 4 hours after incubation, cell aggregation began. Most of the cell clumps were formed by 8-15 cells. The membranes of single cells in the clumps could be distinguished under phase-contrast microscope. At 24 hours after incubation, the cells aggregated together to form 1-3 larger elliptic cell spheroids in each cell line. The cell spheroids consisted of more than 100 cells. There were still several cell clumps formed by 10-30 cells besides a few larger cell spheroids. Moreover, a lot of cells remained as single cells. After incubation for 1 week, most of the cell clumps remained the same size as at 24 hours. No significant difference was observed in cell aggregation capability between untransduced and transduced cells in vitro.
Comparison of cell antigen expression by IHC  The ratio of positive cells of antigen expression in HT-29, variant HT-29c and transfected HT-29cEGFPclone cells are shown in Table 4. No significant difference was observed in the positive ratios of HT-29, HT-29c and HT-29cEGFPclone cells.

EGFP expression in vivo
Five days after injection of HT-29cEGFPclone#7 cells, a rat s.c. tumor could be found. Two weeks after injection the rat was sacrificed. The rat had a s.c. tumor that ranged from 13.0-15.3 mm in diameter. The fresh tumor tissues were sliced at 0.7-1.0 mm and at 60
mm cryosections, then observed directly under fluorescence microscope. The tumor tissue displayed strong fluorescence (Figure 2), thereby demonstrating stable, high level EGFP expression in vivo during tumor growth. The rat s.c. tumor was also diagnosed by immunostaining with mAb KL-1 (Figure 3).

DISCUSSION
Previous studies have demonstrated the effectiveness and sensitivity of EGFP gene as a marker to visualize micrometastases in live tissue[15,16]. To use EGFP as a marker for in vivo experiments, it is necessary to establish very stable transfectants that can express EGFP constantly under nonselective conditions. In this study the retroviral vector expressing EGFP gene was transduced into HT-29c cells and the transduced cells were selected under G418. The present study showed HT-29cEGFPclone cells had stable and long-term EGFP expression under nonselective conditions in vitro. When passaged successively to passage 50 in vitro, EGFP expression was still high and stable.
     The distinct metastatic potential of tumor cell is one of the most important factors in determining the outcome of metastasis. Many biological characteristics of tumor cells are associated with their metastatic ability such as proliferating potential, cell surface adhesion molecule expression, expression of oncogenes or tumor suppressor genes[17] and cell-cell junctions and active cell separation[18]. Spheroidal aggregates of malignant cells may serve as in vitro model of tumor microregions and of an early, avascular stage of tumor growth. The similarities between the original tumor and the respective spheroids include volume growth kinetics, cellular heterogeneity, e.g. induction of proliferation gradients and quiescence, differentiation characteristics, development of specific histological structures or expression of antigens[19]. Some research using cell aggregates has focused on mechanisms involved in the control of distribution, spread, invasion and metastasis of tumors[20]. Cellular heterogeneity, which is a general property of solid tumors may occur in multicellular spheroids rather than in conventional monolayer cultures. In the present study some biological behaviors were compared between transduced and parental cells in vitro. No differences were found in the expression of antigens. There was no difference in the cell proliferation rate determined by comparing their doubling times. And there was no difference in the cell aggregation capability either, which correlated with the metastatic potential.
     In the present study, EGFP gene-transduced HT-29c cells were successfully used to visualize s.c. tumors in rat. The fresh tumor tissues could be analyzed directly under fluorescence microscope. The tumor tissue showed strong fluorescence, demonstrating stable, high level of EGFP expression in vivo during tumor growth. Other studies also demonstrated that EGFP gene transduced tumor cells were successfully used to visualize extensive peritoneal seeding[21], lung metastasis[22], skeletal metastasis[23] and bone metastasis[24,25], brain tumor[26,27] and liver metastasis[28]. Using EGFP fluorescence, diagnosis of tumor metastasis can be detected down to the single-cell level. This method has a higher resolution and is much more feasible than the traditional cumbersome pathological examination procedures, such as histology and immunohistochemistry. It is possible that when EGFP-expressing cells undergo apoptosis, they could be engulfed by macrophages. However, when EGFP-expressing cells die, they lose their fluorescence, such as in necrotic areas of tumors, suggesting that these macrophages will not interfere with the detection of metastases[29]. Studies have shown that EGFP transfectants should also be useful with new techniques such as intravital videomicroscopy, which previously involved labeling of tumor cells with dyes[30]. Flotte et al.[31] reported gene transfer and expression could be detected by a fluorescence video-endoscopy technique. This method could be used to reliably track transfer in living animals or patients. Other results also showed all intravital imaging, that is, imaging of an intact primary tumor in a living animal was carried out on the laser scanning confocal microscope using the whole-animal platform in animal models with EGFP-expressing tumor cells[32]. Recent studies showed whole-body optical imaging, in real time, of genetically EGFP-expressing tumor growth and metastases. The whole-body optical imaging system is external and noninvasive. It affords unprecedented continuous visual monitoring of malignant growth and spread within intact animals[33,34]. A major advantage of EGFP-expressing tumor cells is that they do not need any preparation and can be seen in fresh living tissues at the microscopic level, and it allows direct observations of metastasis in an intact orthotopically growing primary tumor in a living animal.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
We sincerely thank Dr. Zhu Kejian in the Department of Dermatology of the Second Affiliated Hospital of Medical College, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province for performing the FACS analysis.

REFERENCES
1    Prasher DC, Eckenrode VK, Ward WW, Prendergast FG, Cormier JM. Primary structure of the Aequorea 
      victoria green-fluorescent protein. Gene 1992; 111: 229-233
2    Chalfie M, Tu Y, Euskirchen G, Ward WW, Prasher DC. Green fluorescent protein as a marker for gene 
      expression. Science 1994; 263: 802-805
3    Cubitt AB, Heim R, Adams SR, Boyd AE, Gross LA, Tsien RY. Understanding, improving and using green 
      fluorescent proteins. Trends Biochem Sci 1995; 20: 448-455
4    Stearns T. Green fluorescent protein. The green revolution. Curr Biol 1995; 5: 262-264
5    Heim R, Cubitt AB, Tsien RY. Improved green fluorescence. Nature 1995; 373: 663-664
6    Zhang G, Gurtu V, Kain RS. An enhanced green fluorescent protein allows sensitive detection of gene transfer 
      in mammalian cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 1996; 227: 707-711
7    Kimata Y, Iwaki M, Lim CR, Kohno K. A novel mutation which enhances the fluorescence of green fluorescent protein 
      at high temperatures. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 1997; 232: 69-73
8    Cheng L, Fu J, Tsukamoto A, Hawley RG. Use of green fluorescent protein variants to monitor gene transfer 
      and expression in mammalian cells. Nat Biotechnol 1996; 14: 606-609
9    Wysocka A, Krawczyk Z. Green fluorescent protein as a marker for monitoring activity of stress-inducible hsp70 rat 
      gene promoter. Mol Cell Biochem 2000; 215: 153-156
10  D
'Assoro AB, Stivala F, Barrett S, Ferrigno G, Salisbury JL. GFP-centrin as a marker for centriole dynamics in the 
      human breast cancer cell line MCF-7. Ital J Anat Embryol 2001; 106(2 Suppl 1):103-110
11  Ahmed F, Wyckoff J, Lin EY, Wang W, Wang Y, Hennighausen L, Miyazaki J, Jones J, Pollard JW, Condeelis JS, Segall 
      JE. GFP expression in the mammary gland for imaging of mammary tumor cells in transgenic mice. Cancer Res 
      2002; 62: 7166-7169
12  Zhao H, Hart LL, Keller U, Holth LT, Davie JR. Characterization of stably transfected fusion protein GFP-estrogen 
      receptor
-al-lpha in MCF-7 human breast cancer cells. J Cell Biochem 2002; 86: 365-375
13  Vogel I, Shen Y, Soeth E, Juhl H, Kremer B, Kalthoff H, Henne-Bruns D. A human carcinoma model in athymic 
      rats reflecting solid and disseminated colorectal metastases. Langenbecks Arch Surg 1998; 383: 466-473
14  Sambrook J, Gething MJ. Protein structure. Chaperones, paperones. Nature 1989; 342: 224-225
15  Chishima T, Miyagi Y, Wang X, Yamaoka H, Shimada H, Moossa AR, Hoffman RM. Cancer invasion and 
      micrometastasis visualized in live tissue by green fluorescent protein expression. Cancer Res 1997; 57: 2042-2047
16  Shintani S, Mihara M, Nakahara Y, Aida T, Tachikawa T, Hamakawa H. Lymph node metastasis of oral cancer 
      visualized in live tissue by green fluorescent protein expression. Oral Oncol 2002; 38: 664-669
17  Takahashi Y, Ellis LM, Wilson MR, Bucana CD, Kitadai Y, Fidler IJ. Progressive upregulation of metastasis-related genes 
      in human colon cancer cells implanted into the cecum of nude mice. Oncol Res 1996; 8: 163-169
18  Guvakova MA, Adams JC, Boettiger D. Functional role of alpha-actinin, PI 3-kinase and MEK1/2 in insulin-like growth 
      factor I receptor kinase regulated motility of human breast carcinoma cells. J Cell Sci 2002; 115(Pt 21): 4149-4165
19  Mueller-Klieser W. Multicellular spheroids. A review on cellular aggregates in cancer research. J Cancer Res Clin 
      Oncol 1987; 113: 101-122
20  Grill J, Lamfers ML, van Beusechem VW, Dirven CM, Pherai DS, Kater M, Van der Valk P, Vogels R, Vandertop WP, 
      Pinedo HM, Curiel DT, Gerritsen WR. The organotypic multicellular spheroid is a relevant three-dimensional model 
      to study adenovirus replication and penetration in human tumors in vitro. Mol Ther 2002; 6: 609-614
21  Fujiwara H, Kubota T, Amaike H, Inada S, Takashima K, Atsuji K, Yoshimura M, Ueda Y, Hagiwara A, Yamagishi 
      H. Functional analysis of peritoneal lymphoid tissues by GFP expression in mice-possible application for targeting 
      gene therapy against peritoneal dissemination. Gan To Kagaku Ryoho 2002; 29: 2322-2324
22  Huang MS, Wang TJ, Liang CL, Huang HM, Yang IC, Yi-Jan H, Hsiao M. Establishment of fluorescent lung 
      carcinoma metastasis model and its real-time microscopic detection in SCID mice. Clin Exp Metastasis 
      2002; 19: 359-368
23  Yang M, Hasegawa S, Jiang P, Wang X, Tan Y, Chishima T, Shimada H, Moossa AR, Hoffman RM. Widespread 
      skeletal metastatic potential of human lung cancer revealed by green fluorescent protein expression. Cancer Res 
      1998; 58: 4217-4221
24  Yang M, Jiang P, Sun FX, Hasegawa S, Baranov E, Chishima T, Shimada H, Moossa AR, Hoffman RM. A 
      fluorescent orthotopic bone metastasis model of human prostate cancer. Cancer Res  1999; 59: 781-786
25  Peyruchaud O, Winding B, Pecheur I, Serre CM, Delmas P, Clezardin P. Early detection of bone metastases in a 
      murine model using fluorescent human breast cancer cells: application to the use of the bisphosphonate zoledronic 
      acid in the treatment of osteolytic lesions. J Bone Miner Res 2001; 16: 2027-2034
26  Jung S, Kim HW, Lee JH, Kang SS, Rhu HH, Jeong YI, Yang SY, Chung HY, Bae CS, Choi C, Shin BA, Kim KK, Ahn KY. 
      Brain tumor invasion model system using organotypic brain-slice culture as an alternative to in vivo model. J Cancer 
      Res Clin Oncol 2002; 128: 469-476
27  MacDonald TJ, Tabrizi P, Shimada H, Zlokovic BV, Laug WE. Detection of brain tumor invasion and micrometastasis 
      in vivo by expression of enhanced green fluorescent protein. Neurosurgery 1998; 43: 1437-1442
28  Li X, Wang J, An Z, Yang M, Baranov E, Jiang P, Sun F, Moossa AR, Hoffman RM. Optically imageable metastatic 
      model of human breast cancer. Clin Exp Metastasis 2002; 19: 347-350
29  Steff AM, Fortin M, Arguin C, Hugo P. Detection of a decrease in green fluorescent protein fluorescence for the 
      monitoring of cell death: an assay amenable to high-throughput screening technologies. Cytometry  2001;45:237-243
30  Chambers AF, MacDonald IC, Schmidt EE, Koop S, Morris VL, Khokha R, Groom AC. Steps in tumor metastasis: 
      new concepts from intravital videomicroscopy. Cancer Metastasis Rev 1995; 14: 279-301
31  Flotte TR, Beck SE, Chesnut K, Potter M, Poirier A, Zolotukhin S. A fluorescence video-endoscopy technique for 
      detection of gene transfer and expression. Gene Ther 1998; 5: 166-173
32  Farina KL, Wyckoff JB, Rivera J, Lee H, Segall JE, Condeelis JS, Jones JG. Cell motility of tumor cells visualized in 
      living intact primary tumors using green fluorescent protein. Cancer Res 1998;  58: 2528-2532
33  Yang M, Baranov E, Jiang P, Sun FX, Li XM, Li L, Hasegawa S, Bouvet M, Al-Tuwaijri M, Chishima T, Shimada H, 
      Moossa AR, Penman S, Hoffman RM. Whole-body optical imaging of green fluorescent protein-expressing tumors 
      and metastases. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2000; 97: 1206-1211
34  Bouvet M, Wang J, Nardin SR, Nassirpour R, Yang M, Baranov E, Jiang P, Moossa AR, Hoffman RM. Real-time 
      optical imaging of primary tumor growth and multiple metastatic events in a pancreatic cancer orthotopic model. 
      Cancer Res 2002; 62: 1534-1540

   Edited by Zhu LH  

 

Reviews Add
more>>


Related Articles:
more>>