|
Chun-Lei
Fan, Lai Wei, Dong Jiang, Hong-Song Chen, Yan Gao, Ruo-Bing Li, Yu
Wang, Institute of Hepatology, People’s Hospital, Peking
University, Beijing 100044, China
Supported by the National Key Technologies Research and
Development Program of China during the Tenth Five-Year Plan, No.
2001BA705B06; the Major State Basic Research Development Program of
China (973 Program), No.G1999054106
Correspondence to: Dr. Lai Wei, Institute of Hepatology,
People’s Hospital, Peking University, 11 Xizhimen South Street,
Beijing 100044, China.
w1114@hotmail.com
Telephone: +86-10-68314422 Ext 5730
Fax: +86-10-68318386
Received: 2003-04-10
Accepted: 2003-05-19
Abstract
AIM: To investigate the clinical and virological course of
coinfection by hepatitis B virus (HBV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV)
in China.
METHODS:
We enrolled 40 patients with chronic HBV and HCV coinfection (Group
BC), 16 patients with chronic HBV infection (Group B) and 31
patients with chronic HCV infection (Group C). They infected HBV
and/or HCV during 1982 to 1989. Sera of all the 87 patients were
collected in 1994 and 2002 respectively. We detected biochemical and
virologic markers and serum HBV DNA and HCV RNA levels of all the
patients. B-type ultrasound detection was performed in some
patients.
RESULTS:
In Group BC, 67.5 % of the patients cleared HBsAg, and 92.5 % of the
patients cleared HBeAg. The clearance rate of HBV DNA was 87.5 %.
There was no significant difference of HBV clearance between Group
BC and Group B. In Group BC, 85.7 % of males and 47.4 % of females
cleared HBV, and males were easier to clear HBV (x2=6.686,
P=0.010). Such a tendency was also found in Group B. The
clearance rate of HCV RNA in Group BC was 87.5 %, significantly
higher than that in Group C (x2=22.963, P<0.001).
Less than 40 % of the patients in all groups had elevated liver
enzyme values. The highest value of alanine aminotransferase (ALT)
was 218 u/L (normal range for ALT is 0-40 u/L). In most patients the
ultrasonogram presentations changed mildly.
CONCLUSION:
The clinical manifestations of patients with HBV/HCV coinfection are
mild and occult. High clearance rate of HBV and easy to clear HBV in
male patients are the characteristics of HBV infection in adults in
China. HBV can inhibit HCV replication, but no evidence has been
found in our data that HCV suppresses HBV replication.
Fan
CL, Wei L, Jiang D, Chen HS, Gao Y, Li RB, Wang Y. Spontaneous viral
clearance after 6-21 years of hepatitis B and C viruses coinfection
in high HBV endemic area. World J Gastroenterol
2003; 9(9): 2012-2016
http://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/9/2012.asp
INTRODUCTION
Hepatitis B virus (HBV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV) are the most
common causes of chronic liver diseases worldwide. Both viruses
could induce chronic hepatitis, which may progress to cirrhosis and
eventually to hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Because HBV and HCV
share similar transmission routes, coinfection seems to be frequent.
Seroprevalence studies have shown that coinfection of HCV is
detected in around 10 % to 15 % of patients with chronic HBV
infection, although the prevalence may vary from country to country[1-3].
Earlier studies in chimpanzees showed that replication of
pre-existing HBV was inhibited by superinfection of NANB hepatitis
virus (HCV)[4]. Some clinical observations indicate that
HCV may inhibit HBV expression and even act as the major cause of
chronic hepatitis[5-8]. And it was also reported that HBV
might suppress replication of HCV[9-12]. The
histopathological findings and clinical outcome in some of these
cases were contradictory. Some researchers found that HBV and HCV
coinfection could significantly increase the risk of development of
fulminant hepatitis and also cirrhosis and HCC[2,13-16].
But others showed neither exacerbation nor diminution of
histopathological changes in patients with HBV/HCV coinfection[17].
Coinfection does not play an important role in the development of
HCC[18,19]. Furthermore, in patients with HBV and HCV
coinfection after orthotopic liver transplantation, presence of HCV
may improve their clinical outcome as compared with HBV infection
alone[20].
Our previous study showed that the history of patients
infected with HCV in China was different from that in Western
countries[21]. At the same time, we enrolled a group of
patients with chronic HBV and/or HCV infection during 1982 to 1988.
Sera of all the 87 patients were collected in 1994 and 2002
respectively. We analyzed the biochemical and virologic markers and
serum HBV DNA and HCV RNA levels in patients with chronic
coinfection and compared the results with the patients with single
HBV or HCV infection. The clinical and virological course of
coinfection of HBV and HCV in China was investigated.
MATERIALS
AND METHODS
Patients
Eighty seven patients with chronic HBV and/or HCV infection
were native individual blood donors in Hebei Province of China, who
had the history of drawing plasma from the blood and transfusion
back of the blood cells during 1982-1989. The serum samples of these
patients were collected in 1994 and 2002, and stored without thawing
at -70 °C. We detected the
serological markers of HBV and HCV in all the patients in 1994 and
2002 respectively. All the patients were divided into 3 groups:
Group BC (HBV and HCV coinfected group including 40 cases), Group B
(single HBV infected group including 16 cases), and Group C (single
HCV infected group including 31 cases). There was no significant
difference in the number of patients, age and sex distribution, and
duration of infection among the groups (Table 1). No patient had
received treatment of immunosuppressors or antiviral agents such as
interferon. And all the patients were negative for anti-HDV and
anti-HIV. None of them had a history of auto-immune disease, and
alcohol abuse.
Table
1
Clinical data for patients with HBV and/or HCV infection
|
Group
BC |
Group
B |
Group
C |
Statistical
value |
| Number
of patients |
40 |
16 |
31 |
|
| Sex
(male/female) |
21/19 |
6/10 |
15/16 |
x2=1.030,
P>0.05 |
| Age
(y)a |
395
(29-50) |
406
(31-53) |
393
(32-44) |
F=0.48,P>0.05 |
| Time
of infection (y)a |
165
(14-21) |
165
(14-21) |
174
(14-21) |
F=2.27,P>0.05 |
| Serological |
|
|
|
|
| markers
(1994) |
|
|
|
|
| HBsAg
+ |
34
(85.0 %) |
16
(100 %) |
0 |
|
| HBeAg
+ |
11
(27.5 %) |
7
(43.8 %) |
0 |
|
| HBVDNA
+ |
37
(92.5 %) |
14
(87.5 %) |
0 |
|
| HCVRNA
+ |
11
(27.5 %) |
0
(0 %) |
19
(61.3 %) |
|
| Anti-HCV |
39
(97.5 %) |
0
(0 %) |
31
(100.0 %) |
|
aData
were expressed as mean ±SD (range).
Serological
examination
Serum anti-HBs, anti-HBe, anti-HBc and HBeAg were detected
by commercially available enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)
kits (RADIM, Italia). HBsAg, anti-HIV and anti-HDV were tested by
ELISA kits (Organon Teknika China Ltd). Testing of anti-HCV was
performed by the third-generation of ELISA kits (Ortho Diagnostic
Systems Inc. NJ). Liver enzymes, such as alanine aminotransferase
(ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), total bilirubin (TBIL),
gamma glutamyl transferase (GGT) and alkaline phosphatase (ALP) were
determined using HITACHI 7170 biochemistry analyzer. Serum AFP was
measured by radioimmunoassay. A value greater than 20 ng/ml was
considered abnormal.
Quantitative
detection of HBV DNA and HCV RNA
Serum HBV DNA and HCV RNA concentrations were determined by
a programmable high-speed thermal cycler (Light Cycler II; Roche
Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany) for fluorescence quantitative
polymerase chain reaction (FQ-PCR) using a commercially available
kit (PG Biotech Co., Ltd., China). For HBV DNA FQ-PCR, the detection
limit of the method was 500 genome copies/ml. For HCV RNA, the
sensitivity limit of the method was about 1 000 genome copies/ml.
Statistical
analysis
All the data were presented as the mean ±SD. x2
test or Fisher’s exact test was used for categorical variables.
The statistical package for social sciences (SPSS, Chicago, IL),
version 10.0, was used for statistical analyses. Significance was
set at a P value of less than 0.05.
RESULTS
Spontaneous clearance of HBV (Table 2)
HCV did not influence the clearance of HBV in Group BC
Persistent negative HBsAg and HBV DNA in serum and liver enzyme was
considered as a criterion for HBV clearance[22, 23]. In
Group BC, 27 of the 40 patients (67.5 %) cleared HBV, and in Group
B, 7 of the 16 patients (43.8 %) cleared HBV. No significant
difference was found between the two groups (x2=2.703, P=0.100)
(Table 2). It was suggested that HCV had no effect on the
elimination of HBV.
Spontaneous clearance of HBV in the course of chronic HBV
infection
Forty patients with coinfection of HBV and HCV had acquired
the viruses for 6 to 13 years. Six of them (15 %) cleared HBsAg, 29
of them (72.5 %) cleared HBeAg, and 3 of them (7.5 %) cleared HBV
DNA spontaneously in 1994 (Table 2). While in Group B, all the
patients were positive for HBsAg and HBV DNA, and 10 of them (62.5
%) cleared HBeAg in 1994. In Group BC, 27 patients (67.5 %) cleared
HBsAg, 37 patients (92.5 %) cleared HBeAg, and 35 patients (87.5 %)
cleared HBV DNA in 2002. No significant difference was found between
the two groups (Table 2). It was suggested that HBV could be cleared
even after 6 years of infection in adults.
Influence of sex and serum virus load on the clearance of HBV
In Group BC, 85.7 % (18/21) of the males cleared HBV, but
only 47.4 % (9/19) of the malas cleared HBV. The HBV clearance rate
of males was significantly higher than that of females (P<0.05).
In Group B, the spontaneous HBV clearance rates were 66.7 % (4/6)
and 30 % (3/10) in males and females respectively, but no
statistical difference was found between them. It showed that males
seemed easier to clear HBV (Table 2). According to the criteria of
HBV clearance[22,23], 10 of the 16 patients (62.5 %) in
Group BC with a high HBV DNA level had cleared HBV in 2002. Among
the 24 patients who had low HBV DNA level, 17 patients (70.8 %)
cleared HBV. There was no significant difference between the high
and low HBV DNA level groups in Group BC (P>0.05). In
Group B, 3 of the 9 patients (33.3 %) with a high HBV DNA level
cleared HBV in 2002. While in 7 patients whose serum HBV level in
1994 was lower than 105 genomic copies/ml, 4 patients (57.1 %)
cleared HBV (P>0.05) (Table 2). It was suggested that the
level of virus load had no effect on the clearance of HBV infection.
Table
2
Clearance of serum HBV markers in Group BC and Group B
|
Group
BC(n=40,
%) |
Group
B(n=16,
%) |
| HBsAg
clearance |
|
|
| Until
1994 |
6(15%) |
0
(0%) |
| Until
2002 |
27
(67.5%) |
8
(50%) |
| HBeAg
clearance/seroconversion |
|
|
| HBeAg
clearance |
|
|
| Until
1994 |
29
(72.5%) |
10
(62.5%) |
| Until
2002 |
37
(92.5%) |
14
(87.5%) |
| HBeAg
seroconversion |
22
(55.5%) |
12
(75%) |
| HBV
DNA clearance |
|
|
| Until
1994 |
3
(7.5%) |
2
(12.5%) |
| Until
2002 |
35
(87.5%) |
13
(81.2%) |
| HBV
clearance |
27
(67.5%) |
7
(43.8%) |
| Male |
18
(85.7%)a |
4
(66.7%) |
| Female |
9
(47.4%)b |
3
(30%) |
| Low
HBV DNA level group(<105
copies/ml) |
17
(70.8%) |
4
(57.1%) |
| High
HBV DNA level group (≥105
copies/ml) |
10
(62.5%) |
3
(33.3%) |
Note.
a vs. bx2=6.686, P=0.010.
Spontaneous
clearance of HCV RNA
In Group BC, 29 of the 40 patients cleared HCV RNA (72.5 %)
in 1994. Thirty five patients (87.5 %) cleared HCV RNA in 2002. Two
patients who were negative for HCV RNA in 1994 became positive in
2002. In Group C, 12 of the 31 patients cleared HCV RNA (38.7 %) in
1994, and 10 patients (32.3 %) cleared HCV RNA in 2002. Three
patients who were formerly negative for HCV RNA became positive in
2002. In 1994 and 2002, the clearance rate of HCV RNA in Group BC
was higher than that in Group C (P<0.01) (Table 3).
Table
3
HCV RNA clearance rate in Group BC and Group C
|
Group
BC(n=40, %) |
Group C(n=31, %) |
Statistics
value
|
| HCV
RNA clearance
|
|
|
|
| Until 1994
|
29
(72.5%)a
|
12
(38.7%)b
|
x2=8.173, (a
vs. b) P<0.05
|
| Until 2002
|
35
(87.5%)c
|
10
(32.3%)d
|
x2=22.963, (c
vs. d) P<0.001
|
| Male
|
17
(80.9%)
|
3
(20%)
|
|
| Female
|
18
(94.7%)
|
7
(43.8%)
|
|
Relationship
between HBV DNA and HCV RNA
Forty
patients with HBV and HCV coinfection were dovided into 3 groups
based on their serum HBV DNA levels in 1994. Within each of the
groups, the patients were reclassified based on their serum HCV RNA
viral load in 1994 (Table 4). Neither inverse nor positive
correlation was found between HBV DNA and HCV RNA levels in the
coinfected patients. However, detection of the sera of coinfected
patients collected in 2002 showed that one who was positive for HBV
DNA in 1994 was negative for HCV RNA. On the contrary, one who was
positive for HCV RNA in 1994 was negative for HBV DNA. The fact that
HBV DNA and HCV RNA could not be found in the same patient at the
same time suggested that HBV and HCV were cleared one by one.
Table
4
Relationship of serum HBV and HCV load in 1994
| HCV
RNA(copies/ml) |
HBV
DNA(copies/ml)
|
Total
amount
|
| <103
|
103-105
|
≥105
|
| <103
|
2
|
14
|
12
|
28
|
| 103-105
|
1
|
5
|
3
|
9
|
| ≥105
|
0
|
2
|
1
|
3
|
| Total
amount
|
3
|
21
|
16
|
40
|
P=0.918.
Table
5
Type B ultrasonic presentations in patients with HBV and/or
HCV infection
|
Normal
|
Mild
|
Medium
|
Severe
|
Fatty
liver
|
Not
detected
|
Total |
| Group
BC
|
4
|
0
|
2
|
1
|
3
|
30
|
10
|
| Group B
|
8
|
0
|
2
|
0
|
3
|
3
|
13
|
| Group C
|
0 |
13
|
14
|
1
|
2
|
1
|
31
|
Clinical
outcome of patients with HBV and HCV coinfection
All
the patients had no apparent symptoms and physical signs of liver
diseases. In Group BC, 10 of them (25 %) had abnormal liver enzyme
values, and the highest value of ALT was 218 u/L with a mean of 95±72
(u/L) (normal range for ALT is 0-40 u/L). Five patients in Group B
and 12 in Group C had elevated liver enzyme values. The rate of
abnormal biochemical values was similar among the groups. The mean
of elevated ALT values was 69±33 (u/L) in Group B and 53±16 (u/L) in
Group C. Fifty three of the patients underwent B type ultrasound
detection, and most of them had mild or moderate abnormal ultrasonic
manifestations according to the criteria formulated by Chinese
Medical Association[24] (Table 5). Other liver enzyme values such as
TBIL, ALP, GGT and AFP were in the normal range in all the patients,
and no one was found to have HCC.
DISCUSSION
All
the patients were individual blood donors with chronic HBV and/or
HCV infection. They have never received interferon or other
antiviral agent treatment, thus our data partly reflected the
natural history of HBV and HCV coinfection.
High clearance rate of both viruses, and mild clinical
manifestations of coinfection were the prominent findings in this
study. It may have some relationship with the special
characteristics of the patients. First, different from those who got
HBV and HCV coinfection sporadically, the patients in our study were
all individual blood donors, and had a history of taking plasma from
the blood and transfusion back of the blood cells. Second, they were
adults when they acquired the infection. During 1982 to 1989, they
provided the blood 5-15 times, and 200 to 400 ml each time. Third,
they were the natives of certain villages in Hebei Province and
their blood was collected in the same hospitals. These
characteristics of the patients may have some relationships with the
high clearance rate of HBV in Group BC and Group B. The mechanism
needs to be further studied. After 14 to 21 years of HBV and HCV
coinfection, 87.5 % of the patients have cleared HCV RNA.
Researchers in Western countries reported that the spontaneous
clearance rate of HCV RNA was less than 15 % in adults with HCV
infection, and 34 % in patients with coinfection[25]. The history of
HCV infection in China was different from that in Western countries,
29 % of the patients who got HCV infection after blood transfusion
for 12 to 25 years have cleared the virus, and the clinical
manifestations were occult[21]. This may be the reason of different
characteristics of patients with coinfection in China from those in
Western countries.
With regard to the relationship of HBV/HCV coinfection and
clinical outcome, most researchers found that coinfection of HBV and
HCV could cause more severe liver damage than single infection[2,13-16]. While in this study, neither patients with
coinfection nor patients with single HBV or HCV infection had
obvious symptoms and signs of liver diseases. Twenty five percent of
patients with coinfection had elevated liver enzyme values. The mean
of elevated ALT values was 95±72 u/L, while other liver enzyme values
such as TBIL, ALP, and GGT were in the normal range. In most
patients the ultrasonic presentations changed mildly. Good clinical
outcome was one of the main characteristics of the patients with
coinfection in this study. It was reported that in patients with HBV
and HCV coinfection after orthotopic liver transplantation, the
presence of HCV might improve the clinical outcome as compared with
HBV infection alone[20]. Utili et al[25] followed up a group
of cancer survival children who acquired HBV and HCV during
treatment of neoplasia for a median period of 13 years, in which the
patients went though a chronic indolent course of the liver disease,
59 % of them lost one or both viruses over time.
The clearance rate of HCV RNA in Group BC was 87.5 % in 2002,
significantly higher than that in Group C (32.3 %) (P<0.05),
and Group BC had a higher clearance rate of HCV RNA compared with
Group C (P<0.05) (Table 3) in 1994. It was suggested that
in HBV and HCV coinfection group the two viruses had mutual
interference, and HBV suppressed HCV replication. While in Group BC,
the patients who were positive for HCV RNA in 1994 were negative for
HBV DNA in 2002, and vice versa. Previous studies also found that
HBV could inhibit HCV replication and took the leading role in
chronic hepatitis[9-12]. Acute HBV superinfection of patients with
chronic HCV infection could suppress their pre-existing HCV, and the
timing or sequence of infection was a factor influencing the outcome
of viral interactions[22, 26]. The mechanism might be that antiviral
cytokines such as IFN-g and TNF-a produced by non-T cells in the
event of superinfection could inhibit the pre-existing virus[27]. In
vitro experiments showed that when HBV DNA and HCV RNA were co-transfected
into HuH7 cells, HBV DNA suppressed HCV RNA secretion, and HCV RNA
also suppressed HBsAg secretion in comparison with either of HCV RNA
or HBV DNA transfection alone[28].
Former studies showed that HCV could inhibit HBV replication[5-8,
29], but in this study, no statistical difference
was found in the clearance rate of HBsAg, HBeAg and HBV DNA between
Group BC and Group B. We did not find any relationship between serum
HCV RNA
and HBV DNA levels in patients with coinfection. The small
number of patients in Group B might result in statistical
discrepancy. Anyway, no evidence was found in this study to support
that HCV could affect HBV replication.
Considering that China is a highly endemic area of HBV, and
most of patients with chronic HBV infection acquired the virus in
their infancy, our data may partly reflect the natural history of
HBV infection in adults. Its characteristics are as follows.
High
clearance rate of HBV and indolent course of the infection
After 14 to 21 years of infection, the clearance rates of
HBsAg, HBeAg and HBV DNA in Group BC were 67.5 %, 92.5 % and 87.5 %,
while in Group B, the clearance rates of these markers were 50 %,
87.5 % and 81.5 % respectively, and no significant difference was
found between the two groups. It was reported that 5-10 % of
chronically infected patients cleared HBV DNA and HBeAg
spontaneously each year, and this might be followed by clearance of
HBsAg[30,31]. In Taiwan the annual clearance rate of HBsAg was 0.43
%[32]. European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL)
reported that in Western countries, about 1-2 % of HBV carriers
became HBsAg negative each year, while in endemic areas the rate of
HBsAg clearance was lower (0.05-0.08 % per year)[23]. In chronic
coinfection the clearance rate of HBsAg seemed higher than that in
single HBV infection, and 2.03 % of patients in Taiwan cleared HBsAg
annually[32]. In this study, either in patients with HBV/HCV
coinfection or in HBV single infection, the clearance rate of HBsAg
was higher than that ever reported. And they had mild clinical
manifestations and no evidence to progress to more severe diseases.
It
seemed easier for man to eliminate HBV
We found in Group BC, most of the males (85.7 %) cleared HBV,
and only 47.4 % of females did so (P<0.05). In Group B, no
statistical difference was found, which might be due to a small
number of cases. It was also reported in a long-term follow-up study
that 88.9 % of the patients who cleared HBsAg were males[32].
The
virus load did not influence the clearance rate of HBV
There is no statistically significant difference of clearance
rate of HBV between different virus load groups.
In short, mild and occult clinical manifestations and high
clearance rate of both viruses were the characteristics of patients
with HBV/HCV coinfection. High clearance rate of HBV in male
patients was a clinical feature in adults with HBV infection. HBV
could inhibit HCV replication, but no evidence was found that HCV
could suppress HBV replication.
REFERENCES
1
Liaw YF. Role of hepatitis C virus in dual and triple
hepatitis virus infection. Hepatology 1995; 22: 1101-1108
2
Crespo J, Lozano JL, de la Cruz F, Rodrigo L, Rodriguez M,
San Miguel G, Artinano E, Pons-Romero F. Prevalance
and significance
of hepatitis C viremia in chronic active hepatitis B. Am J
Gasteoenterol 1994; 89: 1147-1151
3
Rodriguez M, Navascues A, Martinez A, Suarez S, Riestra S,
Sala P, Gonzalez M, Rodrigo L. Prevalence of antibody
to hepatitis C
virus in chronic HBsAg carriers. Arch Virol 1992; 4 (Suppl): 327-328
4
Bradley DW, Maynard JE, McCaustland KA. Non-A, non-B
hepatitis chimpanzees: interference with acute hepatitis A
virus and
chronic hepatitis B virus infections. J Med Virol 1983; 11: 207-213
5
Liaw YF, Tsai SL, Chang JJ, Sheen IS, Chien RN, Lin DY, Chu
CM. Displacement of hepatitis B virus by hepatitis C virus
as the
cause of continuing chronic hepatitis. Gastroenterology 1994; 106:
1048-1053
6
Crespo J, Lozano JL, Carte B. Viral replication in patients
with concomitant hepatitis B and C virus infections. Eur J
Clin
Microbiol Infect Dis 1997; 16: 445-451
7
Pontisso P, Gerotto M, Ruvoletto MG, Fettovich G, Chemello L,
Tisminetzky S, Baralle F, Alberti A. Hepatitis C genotypes
in
patients with dual hepatitis B and C virus infection. J Med Virol
1996; 48: 157-160
8
Pontisso P, Ruvoletto MG, Fattovich G, Chemello L, Gallorini
A, Ruol A, Alberti A. Clinical and virological profiles in
patients
with multiple hepatitis virus infections. Gastroenterology 1993;
105: 1529-1533
9
Ohkawa K, Hayashi N, Yuki N, Masuzawa M, Kato M, Yamamoto K,
Hosotsubo H, Deguchi M, Katayama K, Kasahara
A. Long term follow-up
of hepatitis B virus and hepatitis C virus replication levels in
chronic hepatitis patients
co-infected with both viruses. J Med
virol 1995; 46: 258-264
10
Sheen IS, Liaw YF, Lin DY, Chu CM. Role of hepatitis C virus
infection in spontaneous hepatitis B surface antigen
clearance
during chronic hepatitis B virus infection. J Infect Dis 1992; 165:
831-834
11
Zarski JP, Bohn B, Bastie A, Pawlotsky JM, Baud M,
Bost-Bezeaux F, Nhieu JT, Seigneurin JM, Buffet C, Dhumeaux
D.
Characteristic of patients with dual infection by hepatitis B and C
viruses. J Hepat 1998; 28: 27-33
12
Shirazi LK, Petermann D, Muller C. Hepatitis B virus DNA in
sera and liver tissue of HBeAg negative patients with
chronic
hepatitis C. J Hepatol 2000; 33: 785-790
13
Ishikawa T, Ichida T, Yamagiwa S, Sugahara S, Uehara K,
Okoshi S, Asakura H. High viral loads, serum
alanine
aminotransferase and gender are predictive factors for the
development of hepatocellular carcinoma from
viral compensated liver
cirrhosis. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2001; 16: 1274-1278
14
Chiaramonte M, Stroffolini T, Vian A, Stazi MA, Floreani A,
Lorenzoni U, Lobello S, Farinati F, Naccarato R. Rate
of incidence
of hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with compensated viral
cirrhosis. Cancer 1999; 85: 2132-2137
15
Sagnelli E, Coppola N, Scolastico C, Mogavero AR, Filippini
P, Piccinino F. HCV genotype and 搒ilent
HBV coinfection:
two main risk factors for a more severe liver
disease. J Med Virol 2001; 64: 350-355
16
Lee DS, Huh K, Lee EH, Lee DH, Hong KS, Sung YC. HCV and HBV
coexist in HBsAg-negative patients with HCV
viraemia: Possibility of
coinfection in these patients must be considered in HBV-high endemic
area. J Gastroen
Hepatol 1997; 12: 855-861
17
Colombari R, Dhillon AP, Piazzola E, Tomezzoli AA, Angelini
GP, Capra F, Tomba A, Scheuer PJ. Chronic hepatitis
in multiple
virus infection: histopathological evaluation. Histopathology 1993;
22: 319-325
18
Shiratori Y, Shiina S, Zhang PY, Ohno E, Okudaira T, Payawal
DA, Ono-Nita SK, Imamura M, Kato N, Omata M. Does
dual infection by
hepatitis B and C viruses play an important role in the pathogenesis
of hepatocellular carcinoma
in Japan? Cancer 1997; 80: 2060-2067
19
Ruiz J, Sangro B, Cuende JI, Beloqui O, Riezu-Boj JI, Herrero
JI, Prieto J. Hepatitis B and C virus infections in patients
with
hepatocelluar carcinoma. Hepatology 1992; 16: 637-641
20
Huang EJ, Wright TL, Lake JR, Combs C, Ferrell LD. Hepatitis
B and hepatitis C coinfections and persistent hepatitis
B
infections: clinical outcome and liver pathology after
transplantation. Hepatology 1996; 23: 296-404
21
Wei L, Wang QX, Xu XY, Wan H, Gao Y, Tian XL, Yu M, Sun DG,
Fan CL, Jin J, Fan WM, Yi LM, Zhu WF, Chen HS,
Zhuang H, Wang Y.
12-25-year follow-up of hepatitis C virus infection in a rural area
of Hebei Province, Beijing
Daxue Xuebao [Yixue Ban] 2002; 34:
574-578
22
Sagnelli E, Coppola N, Messina V, Caprio D, Marrocco C,
Marotta A, Onofrio M, Scolastico C, Filippini P. HBV
superinfection
in hepatitis C virus chronic carriers, viral interaction, and
clinical course. Hepatology
2002; 36: 1285-1291
23
EASL International consensus conference on hepatitis B. 13-14
September, 2002: Geneva, Switzerland.
Consensus statement(short
version). J Hepatol 2003; 38: 533-540
24
Chinese Medical Association. The Programme for prevention and
cure of viral hepatitis. Zhonghua Ganzangbing
Zazhi 2000; 8: 324-329
25
Utili BR, Zampio R, Bellopede P, Marracino M, Ragone E,
Adinolfi LE, Ruggiero G, Capasso M, Indolfi P, Casale F,
Martini A,
Tullio TD. Dual or single hepatitis B and C virus infection in
childhood
cancer survivior: long term
follow-up and effect of
interferon treatment. Blood 1999; 94: 4046-4052
26
Liaw YF, Yeh CT, Tsai SL. Impact of acute hepatitis B virus
superinfection on chronic hepatitis C virus infection. Am
J
Gastroenterol 2000; 95: 2978-2980
27
Chisari FV. Viruses, immunity, and cancer: lessons from
hepatitis B. Am J Pathol 2000; 156: 1117-1132
28
Uchida T, Kaneita Y, Gotoh K, Kanagawa H, Kouyama H,
Kawanishi T, Mima S. Hepatitis C virus is frequently
coinfected with
serum marker-negative hepatitis B virus: probable replication
promotion of the latter as
demonstrated by in vitro cotransfection.
J Med Virol 1997; 52: 399-405
29
Jardi R, Rodriguez F, Buti M, Costa X, Cotrina M, Galimany R,
Esteban R, Guardia J. Role of hepatitis B, C,and D viruses
in dual
and triple infection: influence of viral genotype and hepatitis B
precore and basal core promoter mutations on
viral replicative
interference. Hepatology 2001; 34: 404-410
30
Bonino F, Rosina F, Rizzetto M, Rizzi R, Chiaberge E,
Tardanico R, Callea F, Verme G. Chronic hepatitis in HBsAg
carriers
with serum HBV-DNA and anti-HBe. Gastroenterology 1986; 90:
1268-1273
31
Lohiya G, Lohiya S, Ngo VT, Crinella R. Epidemiology of
hepatitis B e antigen and antibody in mentally retarded
HBsAg
carriers. Hepatology 1986; 6: 163-166
32
Sheen IS, Liaw YF, Lin DY, Chu CM. Role of hepatitis C and
delta viruses in the termination of chronic hepatitis B
surface
antigen carrier atate: a multivariate analysis in a longitudinal
follow-up study. J Infect Dis 1994; 170: 358-361
Edited
by Zhang JZ and Wang XL
| |