|
Sebnem
Ustun, Department of Gastroenterology, School of Medicine,
University of Ege, 35100, Bornova, Izmir, Turkey
Hande Dagci, Department of Parasitology, School of Medicine,
University of Ege, 35100, Bornova, Izmir, Turkey
Umit Aksoy, Department of Parasitology, School of Medicine,
University of Dokuz Eylul, Izmir, Turkey
Yuksel Guruz, Department of Parasitology, School of Medicine,
University of Ege, 35100, Bornova, Izmir, Turkey
Galip Ersoz, Department of Gastroenterology, School of
Medicine, University of Ege, 35100, Bornova, Izmir, Turkey
Correspondence to: Sebnem Ustun, Department of
Gastroenterology, School of Medicine, University of Ege, 35100,
Bornova, Izmir, Turkey. sustun@med.ege.edu.tr
Telephone: +90-232-3881969
Received: 2003-03-28
Accepted: 2003-04-20
Abstract
AIM: To explore the prevalence of amebiasis in inflammatory
bowel disease (IBD) in Turkey.
METHODS:
In this study, amoeba prevalence in 160 cases of IBD, 130 of
ulcerative colitis and 30 of Crohn's disease were investigated in
fresh faeces by means of wet mount+Lugol's iodine staining, modified
formol ethyl acetate and trichrome staining methods and to compare
the diagnostic accuracy of wet mount+Lugol's iodine staining,
modified formol ethyl acetate and trichrome staining methods in the
diagnosis of Entamoeba histolytica (E. histolytica)/
Entamoeba dispar (E. dispar).
RESULTS:
E. histolytica/E. dispar cysts and trophozoites were found in
14 (8.75 %) of a total of 160 cases, 13 (10.0 %) of the 130 patients
with ulcerative colitis and 1 (3.3 %) of the 30 patients with
Crohn's disease. As for the 105 patients in the control group who
had not any gastrointestinal complaints, 2 (1.90 %) patients were
found to have E. histolytica /E. dispar cysts in their faeces.
Parasite prevalence in the patient group was determined to be
significantly higher than that in the control group (Fischer's Exact
Test, P<0.05). When the three methods of determining
parasites were compared with one another, the most effective one was
found to be trichrome staining method (Kruskal-Wallis Test, P<0.01).
CONCLUSION:
Consequently, amoeba infections in IBD cases have a greater
prevalence compared to the normal population. The trichrome staining
method is more effective for the detection of E. histolytica /E.
dispar than the wet mount+Lugol's iodine staining, modified formol
ethyl acetate methods.
Ustun
S, Dagci H, Aksoy U, Guruz Y, Ersoz G. Prevalence of amebiasis in
inflammatory bowel disease in Turkey. World J Gastroenterol
2003; 9(8): 1834-1835
http://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/9/1834.asp
INTRODUCTION
Amebiasis, which affects nearly 500 million people in the world,
is more prevalent in developing countries in particular[1].
It is difficult to distinguish IBD from colitis associated with
amoeba according to both symptomatic and endoscopic appearance of
the colon. It is not even possible to establish a differential
diagnosis by means of microscopic examination. Sometimes IBD can
co-exist with amebiasis. This, of course, leads to confusion in the
diagnosis and treatment of the disease[2].
This
study was planned to consider amoeba in the cases diagnosed as IBD
in the gastroenterology clinic and to compare the accuracy of wet
mount + Lugol's iodine staining, modified formol ethyl acetate and
trichrome staining methods in the diagnosis of E. histolytica/E.
dispar.
MATERIALS
AND METHODS
160 people who were diagnosed as IBD by endoscopic,
histopathologic, radiologic and laboratory examinations at our
clinic were included in this study which was carried out between
January 2000 and June 2001. Of all the cases, 130 were diagnosed as
ulcerative colitis and 30 as Crohn's disease. 105 people of even age
and sex distribution who had not any gastrointestinal complaints and
reported to the district health centre with other complaints were
assessed as the control group. Fresh faeces samples taken from these
people were examined immediately using the wet mount+Lugol's iodine
staining, modified formol ethyl acetate and trichrome staining
methods.
Fisher's exact test was applied to the groups
(ulcerative colitis, Crohn's disease and control) for a comparison
of amoeba frequency among them. The assessment of wet mount+Lugol's
iodine staining, modified formol ethyl acetate methods used in the
diagnosis of E. histolytica/E. dispar, was conducted by calculation
of sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value, positive
predictive value and rate of accuracy.
RESULTS
In our study in which the prevalence of E. histolytica/E.
dispar in IBD was investigated, we found E. histolytica/E.
dispar cysts and trophozoits in 14 (8.75 %) of the 160 IBD cases. E.
histolytica/E. dispar cysts and/or trophozoits were also
determined in 13 (10.0 %) of the 130 patients with ulcerative
colitis and 1 (3.3 %) of the 30 Crohn's disease patients (Table 1).
Frequency of E. histolytica/E. dispar in patients with IBD
was significantly higher than that in the control group (Fisher's
exact test, P<0.05). When the groups of patients with IBD
were compared with the control group separately, the frequency of E.
histolytica/E. dispar in patients with ulcerative colitis was
significantly higher than that in the control group. For Crohn's
disease, on the other hand, it was not significantly different from
the control group. A comparison between the patients with ulcerative
colitis and those with Crohn's disease revealed that E.
histolytica/E. dispar were more significantly frequent in the
patients with ulcerative colitis (Fisher's exact test, P<0.05).
When the three methods of determining parasites were compared with
one another, the most effective one was found to be trichrome
staining method as can be seen in Table 1 (Kruskal-Wallis test, P<0.01).
The sensitivity of wet mount+Lugol's iodine staining, modified
formol ethyl acetate methods was found to be quite low as compared
to the trichrome staining method (36 %, 64 %, respectively) (Table
2).
Table
1 Number and
methods for determination of E. histolytica/E determined in
cases with IBD diagnosis and control group
|
Wet
mount ± Lugol's iodine
staining |
Modified
formol ethyl
acetate |
Trichrome staining method |
Total
(non
e of parasite/patient) |
| Ulcerative
colitis |
5*(%3.84) |
8*(%6.15) |
13*(%10.0) |
13/130 |
| Crohn's
disease |
- |
1*(%3.33) |
1*(%3.33) |
1/30 |
| Control
group |
1*(%0.95) |
2*(%1.90) |
2*(%1.90) |
2/105 |
*
The parasite was determined by more than one method (+).
Table
2 Comparison of wet
mount+Lugol's iodine, modified formol ethyl acetate methods with
trichrome staining method
| |
Modified
formol ethyl
acetate (%) |
Wet
mount+Lugol's iodine
staining (%) |
| Sensitivity |
64 |
36 |
| Specificity |
99 |
98 |
| False
negatives |
36 |
64 |
| False
positives |
0.1 |
0.1 |
| Positive
predictive value |
90 |
63 |
| Negative
predictive value |
97 |
95 |
| Rate
of accuracy |
97 |
93 |
DISCUSSION
Few studies have been performed in Turkey on this particular
subject. In a study they carried out in the Province of Istanbul
between April 1994 and July 1995. Bayramicli et al[3]
explored the presence of amebiasis in 19 patients being investigated
with a preliminary diagnosis of ulcerative colitis and found E.
histolytica/Ea in 69 % of the cases. In a study they carried out
in the Province of Antalya to determine the rate of amebiasis in 43
patients with ulcerative colitis. Suleymanlar et al[4]
found E. histolytica cysts and trophozoites in 22 (54 %) of the
patients. These values are higher than those we have found. The
reason for this is the fact that the incidence of E. histolytica/E.
dispar has been
diminishing in Turkey in recent years.
Prokopowicz
et al[5] determined 5 cases of amebiasis (4.85 %)
among 103 patients with ulcerative colitis and claimed that this
rate was significant in the treatment of chronic ulcerative colitis
patients. We have obtained a higher rate than that of Prokopowicz in
our study in which we found E. histolytica/E. dispar cysts and
trophozoites in 13 (10.0 %) of 130 patients with ulcerative colitis.
This was due to the environmental factors as high temperature and
humidity, which are effective in and around Izmir, as well as lower
immune resistance against the infection in addition to poorer
hygiene. Chan et al[6] presented three cases with
ulcerative colitis and E. histolytica infection and mentioned the
problems to be faced during treatment.
In
conclusion, amoeba infection in IBD cases, especially in patients
with ulcerative colitis is more prevalent compared to the normal
population. A differential diagnosis is extremely important for IBD
and amebiasis cases. Therefore, we believe that E. histolytica/E.
dispar must be explored in the faeces before planning a diagnostic
scheme for cases diagnosed as IBD. In addition, the sensitivity of
wet mount+Lugol's iodine staining and modified formol ethyl acetate
methods was found to be low in this study. Therefore, we think it
would be necessary to use the trichrome staining method in the
investigation of E. histolytica/E. dispar in patients with
IBD diagnosis.
REFERENCES
1
Andersen PL. Amebiasis. Ugeskr Laeger 2000; 162: 1537-1541
2
Hansen LH, Lund C. Amebiasis-a differential diagnosis from
inflammatory bowel disease. Ugeskr Laeger
1998; 160: 5514-5515
3 Bayramicli
OU, Dalay R, Konuksal F, Kilic G, Akbayir N, Ovunc O. Ulseratif
kolitle amebiasisin birlikteligi. Turk
J Gastroenterol 1997; 8: 94-96
4 Süleymanlar
I, Atilgan S, Ertugrul C, Isitan F. Ulseratif kolit ve intestinal
amebiasis birlikteligi ve tedavide
karsilasilan sorunlar.
Gastroenteroloji 1996; 7: 22
5
Prokopowicz D, Zagorski K, Kramarz P. Amoebiasis-a problem in
patients with ulcerative colitis. Wiad Lek
1994; 47: 248-251
6
Chan KL, Sung JY, Hsu R, Liew CT. The association of the
amoebic colitis and chronic ulcerative colitis. Singapore Med
J 1995; 36: 303-305
Edited
by Xu
XQ and Wang XL
| |