|
Shi-Nan
Nie, Xiao-Ming Qian, Xue-Hao Wu, Shi-Yu Yang, Wen-Jie Tang, Bao-Hua
Xu, Fang Huang, Xin Lin, Dong-Yan Sun, Hai-Chen Sun, Emergency
Department, Nanjing General Hospital of Nanjing Command/Clinical
School of Medical College of Nanjing University, Nanjing 210002,
Jiangsu Province, China
Zhao-Shen Li, Department of Gastroenterology, Changhai
Hospital,Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, 200433, China
Supported by the Key Project of the Tenth-Five-Year Plan
Foundation of PLA, No.01Z059
Correspondence to: Shi-Nan Nie, Emergency Department, Nanjing
General Hospital of Nanjing Command/Clinical School of Medical
College of Nanjing University, Nanjing 210002, Jiangsu
Province,China. shnnie630504@.sohu.com
Telephone: +86-25-4826808-58143
Received: 2003-03-05
Accepted: 2003-04-01
Abstract
AIM: To determine the changes of pS2 and ITF of TFF expression
in gastric mucosa and the effect on ulcer healing of pS2, ITF to
Water-immersion and restraint stress (WRS) in rats.
METHODS:
Wistar rats were exposed to single or repeated WRS for 4 h every
other day for up to 6 days.Gastric mucosal blood flow (GMBF) was
measured by LDF-3 flowmeter and the extent of gastric mucosal
lesions were evaluated grossly and histologically. Expression of pS2
and ITF mRNA was determined by RT-PCR. Immunohistochemistry was used
to further detect the expression of pS2 and ITF.
RESULTS:
WRS applied once produced numerous gastric mucosal erosions, but the
number of these lesions gradually declined and GMBF restored at 2,
4, 8 h after stress. The area of gastric mucosal lesion was reduced
by 64.9 % and GMBF was increased by 89.8 % at 8 h. The healing of
stress-induced ulcerations was accompanied by increased expression
of pS2 (0.51±0.14 vs 0.77±0.11, P<0.01) and ITF (0.022±0.001vs 0.177±0.010, P<0.01). The results were demonstrated further
by immunohistochemistry of pS2 (0.95±0.11 vs 1.41±0.04, P<0.01) and ITF (0.134±0.001vs 0.253±0.01,P<0.01). With repeated WRS, adaptation to this
WRS developed, the area of gastric mucosal lesions was reduced by
22.0 % after four consecutive WRS. This adaptation to WRS was
accompanied by increased GMBF (being increased by 94.2 %), active
cell proliferation in the neck region of gastric glands, and
increased expression of pS2 (0.37±0.02 vs 0.77±0.01, P<0.01) and ITF (0.04±0 0.001vs 0.372±0.010, P<0.01). The result was demonstrated further by
immunohistochemistry of pS2 (0.55±0.04 vs 2.46±0.08, P<0.01) and ITF (0.134±0.001vs 0.354±0.070, P<0.01).
CONCLUSION:
TFF may not only participate in the early phase of epithelial repair
known as restitution(maked by increased cell migration),but also
play an important role in the subsequent,protracted phase of
glandular renewal(made by cell proliferation).
Nie
SN, Qian XM, Wu XH, Yang SY, Tang WJ, Xu BH, Huang F, Lin X, Sun DY,
Sun HC, Li ZS. Role of TFF in healing of stress-induced gastric
lesions. World J Gastroenterol
2003; 9(8): 1772-1776
http://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/9/1772.asp
INTRODUCTION
Stress ulcer is a highly prevalent clinical complication. Fully
understanding the mechanism of healing of stress-induced gastric
lesions not only deepens our insights into stress ulcer, but also
provides new ways for its prevention and treatment in clinical
practice. The mechanism of the recovery of gastric mucosa after
stress exposure has not been fully explained, the healing of stress
ulcerations is a complex process which is affected by different
factors. Current research has found that a variety of peptides are
considered to play a crucial role in the control of mucosal
integrity and repair. Among them, an important role was attributed
to epidermal growth factor and transforming growth factor alpha[1-3].
Recently, a group of new
peptides has been discovered, called TFF (trefoil factor family or
trefoil peptides) because of their uniquely distinctive cysteine-rich
"three-leaf"
secondary structure, which probably protects these peptides from
degradation by luminal acid and proteases within gastrointestinal
tract. pS2 and intestinal trefoil factor (ITF) belong to the growing
family of trefoil peptides[4,5].
The physiological role of
TFF is poorly understood so far. The aim of the present study was to
investigate the expression of pS2
and ITF in gastric mucosa of rats undergone WRS, and to probe
the role of TFF in the early phase of epithelial repair of
stress-induced gastric lesion.
MATERIALS
AND METHODS
Induction of gastric adaptation to WRS: Thirty male Wistar rats,
weighing 210-250 g (purchased from Xipuer-Bikai Experimental Animal
Co. LTD, Shanghai) which had been fasted for 24 h with free access
to water, were used. The animals were deprived of water 1 h before
the experiment and divided into normal control group (n=6)
and experimental control group (n=24). After being fasted for
24 h, the rats of normal control group were lightly anesthetized
with ether and tied up on the rat board, the abdomen was opened, the
stomach was exposed and GMBF was measured in the oxyntic gland area,
gastric mucosa was sampled. The rats of experimental control group
were divided into four subgroups (6 in each group) and exposed to
WRS[6] for 4 h. They were killed either immediately (0
time:namely 0 h) or after 2 h, 4 h, 8 h. GMBF was measured and
gastric mucosa was sampled as described below.
The rats of experimental
control group were divided into four subgroups (6 each group) and
exposed to repeated WRS[7]: The rats of group I were
lightly anesthetized with ether, tied up on the rat board and
exposed to WRS for 4 h by placing in water at 20-23 °C to the rat’s xyphoid level at 10:00 AM on day 1. Then the
rats were anesthetized with pentobarbital (30 mg.kg-1
i.p.), GMBF was measured and gastric mucosa was sampled. the rats of
group II were treated similarly except that after WRS, they were
removed from water and placed at room temprature, and refed with
food and water until 10:00 AM the next day, and starved again for 24
h, WRS was repeated. the rats of group III and IV were exposed to
the 3rd or 4th WRS as described above.
Measurement of GMBF: GMBF
was measured by using laser Doppler flowmetry (LDF-3 flowmeter,
Nankai University, Tianjin, China). In brief, the rats were
anesthetized with pentobarbital (30 mg.kg-1
i.p.), the abdomen was opened, the stomach was exposed and
transected, the gastric contents were gently evacuated to the
exterior through the cut made in the forestomach.Then, an optical
probe was placed gently 0.5 mm above perpendicular to the mucosal
surface in the oxyntic gland area to monitor GMBF displayed in mV
(value of Doppler signal voltage) on the digital panel of the
flowmeter. When GMBF became stable, four points were selected for
measurement (one point for 1 minute) and the average value was
calculated and expressed as U/mV.
Appreciation of UI:
Mucosal lesions were evaluated by the score systems reported by Nie
S[7]. Briefly, after the measurement of GMBF, the stomach
was dissected out and opened along the greater curvature. The
stomach was then examined with a 10×magnifier for the presence of
erosions and scored as follows: 1 point for small round hemorrhagic
erosion, 2 points when the length of hemorrhagic erosion was less
than 1 mm, 3 points when the length was 1-2 mm, 4 points when the
length was 2-3 mm, 5 points when the length was longer than 4 mm.
The score value multiplied 2 when the width of erosion was larger
than 1 mm.
Reverse-transcriptase-polymerase
chain reaction (RT-PCR) for detection of messenger RNA (mRNA) for
pS2 and ITF:The stomachs were removed from rats with intact gastric
mucosa and from those exposed to single or repeated stress.Mucosal
specimens (about 100 mg) were scraped off using a slide glass and
immediately snap frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at -80 °C until analysis. Total RNA was isolated from mucosal samples
using a guanidium isothiocyanate/phenol chloroform single step
extraction kit from Stratagene (Gibco BRL,USA). Following
precipitation, the RNA was resuspended in RNAse-free TE buffer and
the concentration was estimated by absorbance at 260 nm wavelength.
Furthermore, the quality of each RNA sample was determined by
running the agarosefomaldehyde electrophoresis. RNA samples were
stored at -80 °C until analysis.
Single-strand cDNA was
generated from 5 mg
of total cellular RNA using
StrataScriptTM reverse transcriptase (Gibco BRL,USA ) and
oligo (dT) primers (Gibco BRL,USA). Briefly, 5 mg
of total RNA was used as the
template to synthesize complementary DNA with 2.5 U of Maloney
murine leukemia virus reverse transcriptase in 5 ml
of buffer containing 10 mM
Tris-HCl, pH 8.3; 50 mM KCl, 5 mM MgCl2; 1 mM of each
deoxyribonucleoside triphosphate; 2.5 mM of oligo (dt) primers and
1.4 U ml-1
RNAse blocker. Reverse-transcription was performed at room
temperature for 20 min, then at 37 °C for 15 min, at 90 °C for 5 min and at 5 °C for 10 min. The resulting complementary DNA was used as a
template for subsequent polymerase chain reaction (PCR).
A 124-base pair (bp)
fragment of pS2 was amplified from single-stranded DNA by polymerase
chain reaction (PCR) using two oligonucleotide primers for pS2
sequence: Sense primer, 5'-CCATGGAGCACAAGGTGACCTG-3' and antisense
primer, 5'-GGGAAGCCACAATTTATTCT-3'. A 221-base pair (bp) fragment of
ITF was amplified from single-stranded DNA by polymerase chain
reaction (PCR) using two oligonucleotide primers to ITF sequence:
Sense primer, 5'-ATGGAGACCAGAGCCTTCTGGAC-3' and antisense primer,
5'-AGAGGTTTGAAGCACCAGGGC-3'. Concomitantly, amplification of the 521
bp fragment of rat b-actin
was performed on the same RNA samples to assess RNA integrity, two
oligonucleotide primers to b-actin
sequence: Sense primer,5'-TGGGACGATATGGAGAAGAT-3' and antisense
primer, 5'-ATTGCCGATAGTGATGACCT-3'. The nucleotide sequences of the
primers for pS2 were based on the pulished cDNA sequences
encoding pS2[8] and the nucleotide sequences of the
primers for ITF were based on the published cDNA sequences encoding
ITF [9]. The primers were synthesized by Bo-Ya
Biotechnical Co. LTD, Shanghai, China.
Reaction mixture for PCR
contained cDNA template (2 ml),
50 pmol of each primer, and 2.5 U of Termus aquaticus DNA (Promega)
in 10 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.8), 50 mM KCl, 1.5 mM MgCl2, 0.5
mM dNTPs in a volume of 50 ml.
RT blanks (no RNA included) were incubated in each analysis. The
mixture was overlaid with 25 ml
of mineral oil to prevent
evaporation. Amplification was performed using a DNA thermal cycler
for 35 cycles, each of which consisted of 2 min at 94 °C for denaturation, 45 s at 52 °C (pS2) and at 50 °C (ITF) for annealing, and 1 min at 72 °C for extension. The final cycle included extension for 5 min at
72 °C to ensure full extension of the product. The number of
amplification cycles was previously determined to keep amplification
in linear to avoid the "plateau
effect" associated with increased numbers of PCR cycles. 8 ml
of each PCR -product was
electrophoresed on 1.6 % agarose gel stained with ethidium bromide,
and then visualized under UV light. Location of predicted PCR-product
was confirmed by using DNA digest phix 174/Hae III as a stained size
marker. The gel was then photographed under UV transillumination. In
addition to size analysis by agarose gel electrophoresis,specificity
of the primer pair for pS2 and ITF was assessed by
sequencing PCR products. For quantification,we determined the
intensity of polymerase chain reaction products on the negative film
of gel photographs according to Konturek PC et al[10].
Expression of the products was quantified using video image analysis
system (TanonGIS-1000, Tanon Technical Co, LTD, Shanghai, China). An
index of messenger RNA expression was determined in each sample
using the following equation according to Konturek PC et al[11].
Immunocytochemistry: For
histological assessment, the other half of the stomach was fixed in
10 % formalin, embedded in paraffin, and stained with hematoxylin
and eosin. For immunohistochemistry, serial sections obtained from
these paraffin blocks were dewaxed and rehydrated. Endogenous
peroxidase was blocked with 3 % hydrogen peroxide for 15 min.
Sections were then incubated for 35 min with a specific monoclonal
antibody against pS2 and ITF (Asgiraud, Italy), washed
and incubated with biotinylated rabbit anti-mouse antibody. After 35
min incubation in avidin-biotin complex, the sections were incubated
for 2 min in peroxidase substrate(diaminobenzidine, PBS, in addition
to 0.3 percent of hydrogen peroxide) and counterstained with
haematoxylin.
The intensity of pS2
and ITF staining (Mean score) for each cell was graded according to
the criteria described by Nie et al[6].as follows: 0=no staining,
I=weakly positive, II=moderately positive (cytoplasm positive but
other cytoplasmic details also visible), or III=densely stained. The
staining intensity was calculated in 300 consecutive cells in three
regions of the gastric mucosa: Surface epithelium (top), neck region
(neck) and basal portions of the gastric glands (base). The mean
intensity per section and region was calculated. Negative control
sections were processed immunohistochemically after replacing the
primary antibody with an irrelevant monoclonal antibody or
phosphate-buffered-saline (PBS).
Statistical analysis:
Results were presented as means±SD. Statistical comparisons were
made by Student’s t test.The linearly relevant analysis was
applied to analyse the relationship between two variants, P values
less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant.
RESULTS
Gastric lesion induced by single or repeated WRS: WRS applied once
produced numerous gastric mucosal erosions in oxyntic mucosa with
the mean lesion number of 45.32±1.41 per rat. No microscopic evidence of damage occurred in the
forestomach. Microscopical examination of the mucosa after 4 h
stress revealed widespread damage of the surface epithelium with
many cells sloughed off into the gastric lumen and focal area of
deep haemorrhagic necrosis (Figure 1). The number of stress lesions
was gradually declined at 2, 4, 8 h after the end of stress. UI was
reduced to about 20.8 % of the initial number at 8 h after the end
of stress (Table 1). With repeated WRS, adaptative cytoprotection
against stress was developed, UI in II, III, IV groups markedly
reduced as compared with group I (P<0.01). UI after four
consecutive WRS was 22 % of UI after one WRS. Cell proliferation in
the neck regions of gastric glands was activated (Figure 2, Table
2).
Figure
1 Necrosis
appeared as craters in rats after exposed to single WRS for 4 h (HE×200).
Figure 2
Foveolae and neck region elongated and the mucosa appeared
thicker after rats exposed to 4th WRS for 4 h(HE×400).
Change of GMBF after
single or repeated WRS: GMBF of normal rats was 424.70±7.72U/mV. GMBF significantly decreased after single
exposure to WRS and restored at 2, 4, 8 h after the end of stress.
It increased up to 94.5 % of normal value at 8 h after the end of
stress (Table 1). GMBF of normal rats was 484.01±10.97U/mV. GMBF significantly decreased after single
exposure to WRS.With repetitive challenge with WRS, there was an
adaptive increase of it in experimental group, and GMBF of groups
II, III, IV markedly increased as compared with that of group I (P<0.01).
After the 4th time of WRS, the value of GMBF was almost restored to
normal level (94.2 % of normal value). There was a significantly
negative relevance between GMBF and UI (r=-0.953, P<0.01)
(Table 2).
Expressions of pS2
and ITF mRNA and immunohistochemical staining for expression of pS2
and ITF proteins during recovery from stress damage: The expressions
of pS2 and ITF could be detected in normal gastric mucosa.
They were expressed mainly in the regenerative zone of cytoplasm and
weaker expressions were found at the basal portions of the gastric
glands. The expressions of pS2 and ITF in single WRS
significantly decreased and was absent in the necrotic region,
whereas repeated WRS significantly increased expression of pS2
and ITF. In addition to the regenerative zone,other areas including
the lumen of gastric glands also expressed pS2 and ITF.
Figure 3(PDF)
Messenger RNA expression of pS2 mRNA and b-actin
in gastric mucosa of rats after single exposure to WRS and in
control intact rats (M=PCR size marker, 1=control group, 2=group 1,
3=group 2, 4=group 3, 5=group 4).
Figure 4(PDF)
Messenger RNA expression of ITF mRNA and b-actin
in gastric mucosa of rats after single exposure to WRS and in
control intact rats (M=PCR size marker, 1=control group, 2=group 1,
3=group 2, 4=group 3, 5=group 4).
Figure 5(PDF)
Messenger RNA expression of pS2 mRNA and b-actin
in gastric mucosa of rats after repeated exposure to WRS and in
control intact rats (M=PCR size marker, 1=control group,2=group I,
3=group II, 4=group III, 5=group IV).
Figure 6(PDF)
Messenger RNA expression of ITF mRNA and b-actin
in gastric mucosa of rats after repeated exposure to WRS and in
control intact rats (M=PCR size marker, 1=control group,2=group I,
3=group II, 4=group III, 5=group IV).
Table
1
Changes of expression of pS2,
ITF, GMBF and UI in gastric mucosa after exposed to WRS
| Group |
GMBF
(U/mV) |
UI |
Mean
score (pS2) |
pS2/b-actin |
Mean
score (ITF) |
ITF/b-actin |
| Control |
424.70±7.72 |
0.00 |
1.65±0.03 |
0.78±0.11 |
0.003±0.001 |
0.004±0.0002 |
| experimental |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1 |
274.56±13.0b |
45.32±1.41 |
0.95±0.11b |
0.51±0.14b |
0.134±0.001b |
0.022±0.01b |
| 2 |
371.35±15.27bd |
18.31±1.47d |
1.63±0.14d |
0.78±0.13d |
0.259±0.01bd |
0.287±0.008bd |
| 3 |
417.451±12.31d |
11.38±1.31d |
1.53±0.13bd |
0.71±0.12d |
0.136±0.04ad |
0.112±0.009d |
| 4 |
401.32±8.95d |
9.54±1.27d |
1.41±0.04bd |
0.77±0.11ad |
0.235±0.01bd |
0.177±0.01ad |
aP<0.05
vs control group; bP<0.01
vs control group; cP<0.05
vs group 1; dP<0.01
vsr group 1.
Table
2
Changes of expression of pS2,
ITF, GMBF and UI in gastric mucosa after exposed to repeated WRS
| Group |
GMBF(U/mV) |
UI |
Mean
score (pS2) |
pS2/b-actin |
Mean
score (ITF) |
ITF/b-actin |
| Control |
484.01±10.97 |
0.00 |
2.01±0.14 |
0.63±0.01 |
0.0003±0.001 |
0.004±0.0004 |
| experimental |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| I |
321.87±8.85b |
47.23±1.20 |
0.55±0.04b |
0.37±0.02b |
0.134±0.001b |
0.040±0.001b |
| II |
418.35±7.94bd |
30.54±1.12d |
1.51±0.03bd |
0.42±0.01bd |
0.194±0.05bd |
0.108±0.009bd |
| III |
446.09±10.98bd |
20.75±1.54d |
2.55±0.11bd |
0.72±0.02bd |
0.281±0.015bd |
0.265±0.009bd |
| IV |
455.95±11.81bd |
10.39±1.18d |
2.46±0.08bd |
0.77±0.01bd |
0.354±0.07bd |
0.372±0.01bd |
aP<0.05
vs control group; bP<0.01
vs control group; cP<0.05
vs group I; dP<0.01
vs group I.
The expressions of pS2
and ITF mRNA were increased during the healing after single WRS (pS2:
0.51±0.14 vs 0.77±0.11, P<0.01; ITF: 0.022±0.001vs 0.177±0.010, P<0.01) (Figure 3, 4). The same results were
observed by immunohistochemistry (pS2: 0.95±0.11 vs 1.41±0.04, P<0.01; ITF: 0.134±0.001vs 0.253±0.01, P<0.01). With repeated WRS, adaptative
cytoprotection against stress was developed.The expression of pS2
and ITF mRNA was increased by using RT-PCR (pS2: 0.37±0.02 vs 0.77±0.01, P<0.01; ITF: 0.040±0.001vs0.372±0.010, P<0.01) (Figure 5,6) and immunohistochemistry
(pS2: 0.55±0.04 vs 2.46±0.08, P<0.01; ITF: 0.134±0.001vs 0.354±0.070, P<0.01). There was a significantly negative
relevance between expressions of pS2 or ITF and UI (r=-0.921,
P<0.01; r=-0.965, P<0.01), and positive
relevance was found between expressions of pS2 or ITF and
GMBF (r=0.826, P<0.05; r=0.854, P<0.05)
(Table 2).
DISCUSSION
The cytoprotective functions in protecting gastrointestinal
tract against ongoing damage may be accomplished in several ways,
and evidences for participation in both the early phase of
epithelial repair known as restitution (marked by increased cell
migration but no proliferation), and in the subsequent,protracted
phase of glandular renewal (marked by proliferation,differentiation
and migration) have been published[12-14].
This study assessed for
the first time immunohistochemical and RT-PCR analyses of pS2, ITF
expression in rat gastric mucosa after exposure to water immersion
and restrained stress.Our observation showed that expression of pS2
and ITF in gastric mucosa was enhanced shortly after the stress,
leading us to hypothesize that this process might be mediated by pS2
and ITF.
The importance of trefoil
peptides in the process of response to the damage action of strong
irritants has not yet been evaluated.The members of the trefoil
peptide family, including pS2 and ITF, share a common structural
feature, which is a motif of six cysteine residues termed a trefoil
or a P domain.There are increasing evidences that pS2 and ITF are
important in maintaining the integrity of gastric mucosa and
involved in the repair of ulcerated areas in gastrointestinal tract[15-19].
This is supported by an observation that increased expressions of
pS2 and ITF were found in the ulcer-associated cell lineage(UACL),
which is a glandular structure that develops in the area of
gastrointestinal tract adjacent to ulcerated mucosa[20].
This is supported by the findings obtained from in vitro study which
showed that pS2 and ITF exhibited a mitogenic effect on different
cell lines[21,22]. Moreover, exogenously recombinant TFF
has been shown to significantly attenuate the extent of acute
mucosal injury induced by a variety of ulcerogens such as 96 %
ethanol, indomethacin or stress[23], indicating that this
peptide does exhibit gastroprotective activity.
The present study showed
that, WRS applied once produced numerous gastric mucosal erosions.
UI gradually declined at 2, 4, 8 h after the end of stress, the
expression of pS2 and ITF was increased during the healing of
stress-induced ulceration,there was not a correlation between the
expression of pS2 or ITF and UI.
The facts that pS2 or ITF
is over-expressed in gastric mucosa immediately after stress injury
and that this peptide stimulates cell migration, strongly suggest
that it might mediate the early phase healing of acute gastric
lesion called restitution[24-28].
It has also been proposed
that trefoil peptide family contribute to gastric mucosal defence
and repair by affecting cell proliferation[29,30
].
In the present study, we
found this adaptation was accompanied by an increased mucosal cell
proliferation and enhanced expressions of mRNA for pS2 and ITF,
suggesting the involvement of pS2 and ITF in the adaptation process.
The major finding of this
report was the demonstration for the first time that gastric
adaptation to WRS involved overexpressions of mRNA for pS2 and ITF
and an increased rate of cell proliferation in gastric mucosa, and
enhanced cell proliferation was preceded by overexpressions of pS2
and ITF mRNA, although the expressions of mRNA for pS2 and ITF
decreased in initial phase after exposure of gastric mucosa to WRS,
suggesting that this trefoil peptide contributes to cell
proliferation.
The present study also
showed that with repeated WRS, adaptative cytoprotection against
stress was developed, the mucosal lesions reduced markedly after
2nd, 3rd and 4th WRS. The expression of pS2 and ITF was increased.
There was a significantly negative relevance between expressions of
pS2 or ITF and UI.
After the 4th WRS, GMBF
was almost restored to normal level. Therefore, during the process
of tolerant cytoprotection, GMBF, UI and expression of pS2 and ITF
showed regular changes and there was a good relationship beween
them.
Indeed, we have confirmed
that WRS-adapted mucosa exhibits an augment GMBF, but it is not
clear whether this factor could directly or indirectly account for
the mucosal adaptation, or what could be the mechanism of this
mucosal hyperemia in the stomach. TGFa
has been shown to increase GMBF[2,31], while TFF can
promote synthesis of TGFa.
So hyperemia observed during the development of adaptation can be
mediated, at least in part by the release of this peptide.
REFERENCES
1
Brzozowski T, Konturek SJ, Majka J, Dembinski A, Drozdowicz
D. Epidermal growth factor, polyamines, and
prostaglandins in healing of
stress-induced gastric lesions in rats. Dig Dis Sci 1993; 38:
276-283
2
Konturek SJ, Brzozowski T, Majka J, Dembinski A, Slomiany A,
Slomiany BL. Transforming growth factor alpha
and epidermal growth factor in
protection and healing of gastric mucosal injury. Scand J
Gastroenterol
1992; 27: 649-655
3
Konturek PC, Ernst H, Brzozowski T, Ihlm A, Hahn EG, Konturek
SJ. Expression of epidermal growth factor
and transforming growth
factor-alpha after exposure of rat gastric mucosa to stress.
Scand J Gastroenterol
1996; 31: 209-216
4
Podolsky DK. Mechanisms of regulatory peptide action in the
gastrointestinal tract: trefoil peptides. J Gastroenterol
2000; 35 (Suppl 12): 69-74
5
Tran CP, Cook GA, Yeomans ND, Thim L, Giraud AS. Trefoil
peptide TFF2 (spasmolytic polypeptide) potently
accelerates healing and reduces
inflammation in a rat model of colitis. Gut
1999; 44: 636-642
6 Nie SN, Li
ZS, Zhan XB, Gong YF, Tu ZX, Gong YF. Role of the pS2 in healing of
stress-induced gastric lesions. Wei
Chang Bing Xue 2002; 7: 20-23
7
Nie S, Li Z, Zhan X, Tu Z, Xu G, Gong Y, Man X. Role of the
pS(2) in gastric mucosa adaptative cytoprotection
from stress.Zhonghua Yixue Zazhi
2002; 82: 172-175
8
Itoh H, Tomita M, Uchino H, Kobayashi T, Kataoka H, Sekiya R,
Nawa Y. cDNA cloning of rat pS2 peptide and expression
of trefoil peptides in acetic
acid-induced colitis. Biochem J 1996; 318: 939-944
9 Nie SN, Li
ZS, Zhan XB, Xu GM, Tu ZX, Gong YF. Role of the pS2,ITF in the early
phase of epithelial repaire
of stress-induced gastric lesion.
Jiefangjun Yixue Zazhi 2002; 27: 182-185
10
Brzozowski T, Konturek PC, Konturek SJ, Stachura J. Gastric
adaptation to aspirin and stress enhances gastric
mucosal resistance against the damage
by strong irritants. Scand J Gastroenterol 1996; 31: 118-125
11
Konturek PC, Brzozowski T, Pierzchalski P, Kwiecien S, Pajdo
R, Hahn EG, Konturek SJ. Activation of genes for
spasmolytic peptide, transforming
growth factor alpha and for cyclooxygenase (COX)-1 and COX-2
during
gastric adaptation to aspirin damage
in rats. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 1998; 12: 767-777
12
Podolsky DK. Mucosal immunity and inflammation. V. Innate
mechanisms of mucosal defense and repair: The best
offense is a good defense. Am J
Physiol 1999; 277: G495-499
13
Wright NA. Aspects of the biology of regeneration and repair
in the human gastrointestinal tract. Philos Trans R Soc
Lond B Biol Sci 1998; 353: 925-933
14
Podolsky DK. Healing the epithelium: Solving the problem from
two sides. J Gastroenterol 1997; 32: 122-126
15
Farrell JJ, Taupin D, Koh TJ, Chen D, Zhao CM, Podolsky DK,
Wang TC. TFF2/SP-deficient mice show decreased
gastric proliferation, increased acid
secretion, and increased susceptibility to NSAID injury. J Clin
Invest
2002; 109: 193-204
16
Ulaganathan M, Familari M, Yeomans ND, Giraud AS, Cook GA.
Spatio-temporal expression of trefoil peptide
following severe gastric ulceration
in the rat implicates it in late-stage repair processes. J
Gastroenterol Hepatol
2001; 16: 506-512
17
Longman RJ, Douthwaite J, Sylvester PA, Poulsom R, Corfield
AP, Thomas MG, Wright NA. Coordinated localisation
of mucins and trefoil peptides in the
ulcer associated cell lineage and the gastrointestinal mucosa. Gut
2000; 47: 792-800
18
McKenzie C, Thim L, Parsons ME. Topical and intravenous
administration of trefoil factors protect the gastric mucosa
from ethanol-induced injury in the
rat. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2000; 14: 1033-1040
19
Cook GA, Thim L, Yeomans ND, Giraud AS. Oral human
spasmolytic polypeptide protects against aspirin-induced
gastric injury in rats. J
Gastroenterol Hepatol 1998; 13: 363-370
20
Alison MR, Chinery R, Poulsom R, Ashwood P, Longcroft JM,
Wright NA. Experimental ulceration leads to
sequential expression of spasmolytic
polypeptide, intestinal trefoil factor, epidermal growth factor
and
transforming growth factor alpha
mRNAs in rat stomach. J Pathol 1995; 175: 405-414
21
Chinery R, Coffey RJ. Trefoil peptides: Less clandestine in
the intestine. Science 1996; 274: 204
22
Mashimo H, Wu DC, Podolsky DK, Fishman MC. Impaired defense
of intestinal mucosa in mice lacking intestinal
trefoil factor.Science 1996; 274:
262-265
23
Babyatsky MW, deBeaumont M, Thim L, Podolsky DK. Oral trefoil
peptides protect against ethanol-
and indomethacin-induced gastric
injury in rats. Gastroenterology 1996; 110: 489-497
24
Saitoh T, Mochizuki T, Suda T, Aoyagi Y, Tsukada Y, Narisawa
R, Asakura H. Elevation of TFF1 gene expression
during healing of gastric ulcer at
non-ulcerated sites in the stomach: Semiquantification using the
single tube method
of polymerase chain reaction. J
Gastroenterol Hepatol 2000; 15: 604-609
25
Poulsen SS, Thulesen J, Christensen L, Nexo E, Thim L.
Metabolism of oral trefoil factor 2 (TFF2) and the effect of
oral
and parenteral TFF2 on gastric and
duodenal ulcer healing in the rat.Gut 1999; 45: 516-522
26
Dossinger V, Kayademir T, Blin N, Gott P. Down-regulation of
TFF expression in gastrointestinal cell lines by cytokines
and nuclear factors. Cell Physiol
Biochem 2002; 12: 197-206
27
Ito S, Lacy ER, Rutten MJ, Critchlow J, Silen W. Rapid repair
of injured gastric mucosa. Scand J Gastroenterol Suppl
1984; 101: 87-95
28
Konturek PC, Brzozowski T, Konturek SJ, Elia G, Wright N,
Sliwowski Z, Thim L, Hahn EG. Role of spasmolytic
polypeptide in healing of
stress-induced gastric lesions in rats. Regul Pept
1997; 68: 71-79
29
Konturek PC. Physiological, immunohistochemical and molecular
aspects of gastric adaptation to stress, aspirin and to
H. pylori-derived gastrotoxins. J
Physiol Pharmacol 1997; 48: 3-42
30
Modlin IM, Poulsom R. Trefoil peptides: Mitogens, motogens,
or mirages? J Clin Gastroenterol
1997; 25(Suppl 1): S94-100
31
Tepperman BL, Soper BD. Effect of epidermal growth factor,
transforming growth factor alpha and nerve growth
factor on gastric mucosal integrity
and microcirculation in the rat. Regul Pept 1994; 50: 13-21
Edited
by Zhao
P and Wang XL
| |