|
Wen-Hua
Du, Wei-Xiao Yang, Xiang Wang, Xiu-Qin Xiong, Yi Zhou, Tao Li,
Department of Ultrasonography, Daping Hospital and Research
Institute of Surgery, the Third Military Medical University,
Chongqing 400042, China
Supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of
China, No. 30070227
Correspondence to: Wen-Hua Du, Department of Ultrasonography,
Daping Hospital and Research Institute of Surgery, the Third
Military Medical University, Chongqing 400042, China.
duwenhua001@163.com
Telephone: +86-23-68757441
Received: 2002-10-08
Accepted: 2003-02-11
Abstract
AIM: To investigate the possible clinical application value of
second harmonic imaging under low acoustic pressure.
METHODS:
Six New Zealand rabbits, averaging 2.7±0.4 kg, were selected and
operated upon to construct hepatic VX2 tumor carrier model. Hepatic
VX2 tumors were imaged with B mode Ultrasonography (US), and second
harmonic imaging (SHI) under high mechanic index (1.6) and low
mechanic index (0.1). Echo agent was intravenously injected through
ear vein at a dose of 0.01 mL/kg under B mode US and high MI SHI,
and 0.05 mL/kg under low MI SHI, and then the venous channel was
cleaned with sterilized saline. All the images were recorded by
magnetic optics (MO), and they were analyzed further by at least two
independent experienced sonographers.
RESULTS:
Totally 6 hypoechoic and 3 hyperechoic lesions were found in the six
carrier rabbits with a mean size about 2.1±0.4 under B mode
ultrasound, they were oval or round in shape with a clear outline or
a hypoechoic halo at the margin of the lesions. Contrast agent could
not change the echogenicity of the lesions under B mode US and SHI
under high acoustic pressure. However, it could greatly increase the
real time visualization sensitivity of the lesions with SHI under
low acoustic pressure.
CONCLUSION:
Our results suggest that contrast enhanced SHI with low MI and a
bubble non-destructive method would be much more helpful than
conventional SHI in our future clinical applications.
Du
WH, Yang WX, Wang X, Xiong XQ, Zhou Y, Li T. Assessment of hepatic
VX2 tumors of rabbits with second harmonic imaging under high and
low acoustic pressures. World J Gastroenterol
2003; 9(8): 1679-1682
http://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/9/1679.asp
INTRODUCTION
Second harmonic imaging (SHI) technique has been shown more
valuable than conventional B mode ultrasonography (US). SHI involves
transmitting at frequency f and receiving at frequency 2f, and the
contrast enhanced echoes can therefore be obtained at second
harmonic frequency because of the non-linear motion of the gas
bubbles when destroyed by high acoustic pressures[1,2].
However, the use of second harmonic technique under high acoustic
pressure (mechanical indexes 0.6-1.2) does not usually provide ideal
images because of the short duration of enhancement and no
quantitative evaluation and other technical difficulties. To avoid
this, new dedicated software operating at low acoustic pressure
(mechanical index <0.4) has been demonstrated to produce
significant harmonic answer together with a real time imaging based
on the maintenance of microbubbles. Only very small amount of
microbubbles would allow the evaluation of blood flow volume and
blood flow in normal and pathologic tissues. Liver image has been
recently proven to be the first area where microbubbles manifest
similarly to that of computed tomography or magnetic resonance
imaging contrast media. In particular, this technique, applied to
the evaluation of perfusional pattern of hepatic mass lesions,
provides a significant contribution to their detection and
characteristics. In this study, we aimed to find out the features of
these two ultrasonographic methods in the depiction of hepatic
metastasis.
MATERIALS
AND METHODS
Preparation of animal models
Six New Zealand rabbits weighing 2.6-3.2 kg, average 2.7±0.4
kg, were anaesthetized by Sumianxin (a product of the Changchun
Argo-Pastoral University) at 0.2 mL/kg through intramuscular
injection. Hairs over the abdominal region were moulted by 8 %
sodium sulfide, then the region was cleaned by saline water. Median
incision right beneath the metasternum was made to expose the right
lobe of liver. A tunnel about 3 cm deep at the lobe was constructed
with an ophthalmic nipper. Viable VX2 tumor masses about 2-3 mm3
were implanted into the tunnel, locally stanched and then each layer
of the abdominal wall was sutured accordingly. 2 or 3 weeks later,
these rabbits were ready for use. VX2 tumor is a kind of skin
squamous cancer induced by Shope virus, viable VX2 tumor could be
transplanted and underwent passages in the New Zealand rabbits, and
therefore was used as mimicking metastatic hepatic tumor models.
Preparation
of echo contrast agent
Self made echo contrast agent was made from 5 % (g/L) human
albumin and 40 % (g/L) Dextran at a ratio of 1:3 (v/v), the mixture
was then undergone electromechanical sonication (Sonication machine
JY92-2D was manufactured by Ninbo Xinzhi Research Institute) for 90
seconds under mechanical energy of 280 W. During the sonication
process, perfluropropane gas was mixed into the mixture.
Microbubbles manufactured in this way were counted by a Coulter
counter, at a concentration of 1.6×109 bubbles/L
averaging 4.3±2.1 mm.
Equipment
A transducer S8 connected to HP-5500 ultrasound system was
used, second harmonic imaging was transmitted at frequency 3MHz
receiving at frequency 6 MHz, conventional mechanic index was tuned
to 1.6, while low mechanic index was tuned to 0.1. During the whole
process of experiment, the image depth, compensation and TGC should
be kept constant.
Methods
Hepatic VX2 tumors were imaged with conventional B mode US,
and second harmonic imaging (SHI) under conventional mechanic index
(1.6) and low mechanic index (0.1). An intravenous bolus echo agent
was injected through ear vein at a dose of 0.01 mL/kg under
conventional B mode US and high acoustic pressure SHI, and 0.05
mL/kg under low acoustic pressure SHI, and then the venous channel
was cleaned with sterilized saline. All the images were recorded
real-timely by magnetic optics (MO), and they were analyzed further
by at least two independent but experienced sonographers.
RESULTS
Features of VX2 tumor under conventional and harmonic B mode US
A total of 6 hypoechoic and 3 hyperechoic lesions were found
in the six carrier rabbits with a mean size of 2.1±0.4 cm under
conventional B mode ultrasound, no hyperechoic or iso echoic lesions
were found. They were oval or round in shape with a clear outline or
a hypoechoic halo at the margin of the lesions. Contrast images
under conventional B mode US also showed no improvement at all
(Figure 1).
Figure 1 Image
of VX2 tumor lesion under conventional B mode US. Arrow indicated
the VX2 tumor lesion at the anterior part of the right lobe. It was
oval and hypoechoic with a small hyperechoic scar at the center of
the lesion.
VX2
tumor lesions assessed by SHI under high and low acoustic pressures
SHI under high acoustic pressure (Mechanic index 1.6) could
reveal a short duration enhancement of the hepatic arteries and
tumor lesions at the early phase, and an enhancement of the liver
parenchyma and a decreased echo at the later phase. A pronounced
arterial enhancement was also found at one side of the lesion, which
might be considered as the nutrient artery of the tumor. In
addition, branches of the afferent artery were seen at the same
time. Interestingly, a branch vessel was also found coming from the
same artery going to the other side of the lesion as shown in Figure
2a. The whole process of contrast enhanced SHI under high acoustic
pressure lasted only for a few seconds.
Visualization
by second harmonic imaging under low acoustic pressure was quite
different from that by SHI under low acoustic pressure. The
echogenicity of liver parenchyma and hepatic VX2 tumor lesions was
extremely low, and no structures were observable at first. About
five seconds after injection of contrast agent, image of the
inferior vena cava could be observed. Again about fifteen seconds
later, the contrast agent could be observed within the tumor lesion,
as time went by, the afferent artery and its branches of the lesion
could gradually and clearly be visualized. A suspicious branch
artery was also observed going to the other side of the lesion near
the afferent vessels, as what we observed by second harmonic imaging
under high acoustic pressure (Figure 2b). As the contrast agent
accumulated in the lesion, VX2 tumor appeared as a hyperechoic
contour and even satellite lesions could also be observable just
beside the original lesion (Figure 3). About 40 seconds later,
arteries in the liver parenchyma gradually appeared markedly, and
about 20 to 30 seconds afterwards the portal venous system could be
visualized. At this stage, the tumor lesion was revealed as
hypoechoic. During the last stage period, about 2 minutes after
injection of contrast agent, the echogenicity of the liver
parenchyma became hyperechoic, while the tumor lesion and its
satellite lesion became typically hypoechoic. The whole process of
visualization by second harmonic imaging under low acoustic pressure
lasted for almost four minutes.
Figure
2a Image of VX2
tumor lesion under high MI second harmonic imaging. Arrow indicated
the nutrient artery of same VX2 tumor lesion, and the suspicious
artery of a satellite lesion.
Figure 2b Contrast
enhanced second harmonic image under low MI revealed the enhancement
of nutrient arteries of VX2 tumor lesion and the nutritive artery of
satellite lesion.
Figure 3 Image
of second harmonic under low MI. It showed the clear tumor and its
satellite lesion.
DISCUSSION
The accurate recognition or exclusion of focal liver lesions was
a primary objective of diagnostic imaging in patients who were
suspected to have a tumor, and the detection of tumor lesions should
include their number, location and size. Detection of small liver
lesions may be difficult when the acoustic properties of the lesions
were similar to those of the surrounding liver parenchyma[3].
The overall accuracy of US imaging in the detection of liver lesions
has been shown to range from 53-77 %, but the sensitivity of
milimeter nodules has been found to be as low as 20 %[4-6].
US contrast agents were originally developed and used to overcome
some of the shortage of US in the assessment of lesional and
parenchymal microcirculation by increasing the linear backscattering
from the microvascular blood pool. The latest generation of US
contrast agents prepared from perflurocarbon gases has been shown to
be highly effective in enhancing Doppler signals within the
macrovasculature and the microvasculature for several minutes
following an intravenous bolus injection[7-9]. However,
US contrast agents do not enhance the tumor lesion or parenchyma
microvasculature on the fundamental gray-scale image, since the
echoes from the tissues are too strong compared to the small volume
of microbubbles in the microcirculation[10]. Thus these
agents do not significantly improve the detectability of liver
lesions when used in association with fundamental imaging, as what
we have found in this study. It is necessary to take advantage of
their nonlinear characteristics and selectively detect their
emission of harmonics in order to increase the US sensitivity to
contrast.
A
dramatic improvement of contrast enhanced US was the discovery that
the bursting of air-based microbubbles caused by high mechanic
acoustic pressure US generated large quantities of harmonic
frequencies (non-linear response). By decreasing the fundamental
frequency, the contrast between highly vascularized lesions
containing microbubbles and poorly vascularized tissues were
increased[11-14]. Therefore, both macrovasculature and
microvasculature of the liver tumor lesions could be well
visualized. Some significant limitations about this technique have
also been found. Due to the need of breaking air based microbubbles
in order to achieve harmonics, the scans have to be started only 2-3
minutes following contrast agent bolus injection, and thus would
miss completely the arterial and early portal phases. Furthermore,
since all malignancies appear as hypoechoic and all benign tumors
isoechoic in late phase[15], discrimination between
hepatocellular carcinoma and metastasis, hemangiomas and focal
nodular hyperplasia cannot be achieved. In our experiment, although
contrast enhanced second harmonic imaging under high acoustic
pressure could reveal an increased visualization of the tumor
lesions and its surrounding liver parenchymal arteries, the major
defect of this method was the short duration of visualization. A
suitable method for the detection of hypervascular and hypovascular
focal liver lesions should be a bubble non-destruction method with
very low MI and high sensitivity for harmonics, allowing continuous
real-time imaging of the whole liver and the visualization at the
arterial, portal, and late phase during the same examination period
with a single contrast agent administration only[16-21].
Furthermore, it should allow us to carry out perfusion and
reperfusion studies following the planned bubble destruction and
characterization of either hyper- or hypovascular lesions
simultaneously[21-25]. We herewith reported our
experimental results using this new technique, using a low MI SHI, a
nearly complete cancellation of signals from stationary tissues was
achieved. Prior to the injection of self-made albumin contrast
agent, only high amplitude signals were visualized, such as large
vessel walls and the diaphragm. After albumin contrast agent
injection, a true subtraction effect was obtained due to the high
level harmonic signals coming from the bubbles and the dynamic
threshold suppressing low amplitude signals moving toward the
transducer. In all rabbits, the whole vasculatures could be observed
and studied, including an arterial phase about 15-40 seconds, an
early portal phase about 40 to 50 seconds, and a complete portal
phase about one and a half minutes. This result is in agreement with
what has been described by Solbiati, and this "portal
phase" is suggested to be "hepatic sinusoidal phases"[26-31].
The scans could be performed to study the changes of enhancement in
these areas by moving the transducer throughout the liver
visualizing not only the vascular phases in real time, but also any
peculiar region of interest. Using this technique of second harmonic
imaging under low acoustic pressure, we could therefore achieve the
best visualization of macrocirculation and microcirculation
simultaneously. Most interestingly, some satellite lesions, which
were not found by high MI SHI, were now clearly revealed by low MI
SHI as shown in Figures 2b and 3. It can be concluded that contrast
enhanced ultrasonography with second harmonic imaging under low
acoustic pressure is currently more sensitive than that with second
harmonic imaging under high acoustic pressure in the detection of
metastatic lesions as VX2 tumors. This study suggests that this new
technique of low MI and microbubble non-destructive method would be
much more helpful in our future clinical applications.
REFERENCES
1
Choi BI, Kim TK, Han JK, Kim AY, Seong CK, Park SJ.
Vascularity of hepatocellular carcinoma: assessment
with contrast-enhanced
second-harmonic versus conventional power Doppler US. Radiology
2000; 214: 381-386
2
Kono Y, Moriyasu F, Nada T, Suginoshita Y, Matsumura T, Toda
Y, Nakamura T, Chiba T. Ultrasonographic
arterial portography with second
harmonic imaging: evaluation of hepatic parenchymal enhancement
with
portal venous flow. J Ultrasound Med
1999; 18: 395-402
3
Sirlin CB, Girard MS, Baker KG, Steinbach GC, Deiranieh LH,
Mattrey RF. Effect of acquisition rate on liver and portal
vein enhancement with microbubble
contrast. Ultrasound Med Biol 1999; 25: 331-338
4
Tanaka S, Kitamura T, Ohshima A, Umeda K, Okuda S, Ohtani T,
Tatsuta M, Yamamoto K. Diagnostic accuracy
of ultrasonography for hepatocellular
carcinoma. Cancer 1986; 58: 344-347
5
Tanaka S, Kitamura T, Nakanishi K, Okuda S, Kojima J,
Fujimoto I. Recent advances in ultrasonographic diagnosis
of hepatocellular carcinoma. Cancer
1989; 63: 1313-1317
6
Tanaka S, Kitamura T, Imaoka S, Sasaki Y, Taniguchi H,
Ishiguro S. Hepatocellular carcinoma: sonographic and
histologic correlation. Am J
Roentgenol 1983; 140: 701-707
7
Harvey CJ, Blomley MJ, Eckersley RJ, Cosgrove DO, Patel N,
Heckemann RA, Butler-Barnes J. Hepatic
malignancies: Improved detection with
pulse-inversion US in late phase of enhancement with
SHU508A-early
experience. Radiology 2000; 216:
903-908
8
Carter R, Hemingway D, Cooke TG, Pickard R, Poon FW,
MacKillop JA, McArdle CS. A prospective study of six methods
for detection of hepatic colorectal
metastases. Ann Royal Coll Surg Eng 1996; 78: 27-30
9
Forsberg F, Liu JB, Merton DA, Rawool NM, Goldberg BB.
Parenchymal enhancement and tumor visualization using a
new sonographic contrast agent. J
Ultrasound Med 1995; 14: 949-957
10
Girard MS, Sirlin CB, Baker KG, Hall LA, Mattrey RF. Liver
tumor detection with ultrasound contrast: a blinded
prospective
study in rabbits. Acad Radiol 1998; 5(Suppl 1): S189-191
11
Mattrey RF, Wrigley R, Steinbach GC, Schutt EG, Evitts DP.
Gas emulsions as ultrasound contrast agents:
preliminary results in rabbits and
dogs. Invest Radiol 1994; 29(Suppl 2): S139-S141
12
Girard MS, Kono Y, Sirlin CB, Baker KG, Deiranieh LH, Mattrey
RF. B-mode enhancement of the liver with
microbubble contrast agent: a blinded
study in rabbits with VX2 tumors. Acad Radiol 2001; 8: 734-740
13
Porter TR, Xie F. Visually discernible myocardial
echocardiographic contrast after intravenous injection of
solicated dextrose albumin
microbubbles containing high molecular weight, less soluble gases. J
Am Coll
Cardiol 1995; 25: 509-515
14
Kim TK, Han JK, Kim AY, Choi BI. Limitations of
characterization of hepatic hemangiomas using a sonographic
contrast agent(Levovist) and power
Doppler ultrasonography. J Ultrasound Med 1999; 18: 737-743
15
Koito K, Namieno T, Morita K. Differential diagnosis of small
hepatocellular carcinoma and adenomatous hyperplasia
with power Doppler sonography. Am J
Roentgenol 1998; 170: 157-161
16
Gaiani S, Casali A, Serra C, Piscaglia F, Gramantieri L,
Volpe L, Siringo S, Bolondi L. Assessment of vascular patterns
of small liver mass lesions: value
and limitation of the different Doppler ultrasound modalities. Am J
Gastroenterol
2000; 95: 3537-3546
17
Kim TK, Choi BI, Han JK, Hong HS, Park SH, Moon SG. Hepatic
tumors: contrast agent-enhancement patterns
with pulse-inversion harmonic US.
Radiology 2000; 216: 411-417
18
Choi BI, Kim TK, Han JK, Chung JW, Park JH, Han MC. Power
versus conventional color Doppler sonography:
comparison in the depiction of
vasculature in liver tumors. Radiology 1996, 200:55-58
19
Bartolozzi C, Lencioni R, Ricci P, Paolicchi A, Rossi P,
Passariello R. Hepatocellular carcinoma treatment with
percutaneous ethanol injection:
evaluation with contrast-enhanced color Doppler US. Radiology 1998;
209: 387-393
20
Seidel G, Vidal-Langwasser M, Algermissen C, Gerriets T, Kaps
M. The influence of doppler system settings on
the clearance kinetics of different
ultrasound contrast agents. Eur J Ultrasound 1999; 9: 167-175
21
Cosgrove D. Ultrasound contrast enhancement of tumors. Clin
Radiol 1996; 51(Suppl 1): 44-49
22
Gaiani S, Volpe L, Piscaglia F, Bolondi L. Vascularity of
liver tumours and recent advances in Doppler ultrasound. J
Hepatol 2001; 34: 474-482
23
Leen E, McArdle CS. Ultrasound contrast agents in liver
imaging. Clin Radiol 1996; 51(Suppl 1): 35-39
24
Cosgrove D. Microbubble enhancement of tumour neovascularity.
Eur Radiol 1999; 9(Suppl 3): S413-414
25
Strobel D, Krodel U, Martus P, Hahn EG, Becker D. Clinical
evaluation of contrast enhanced color Doppler sonography
in the differential diagnosis of
liver tumors. J Clin Ultrasound 2000; 28:1-13
26
Hosten N, Puls R, Bechstein WO, Felix R. Focal liver lesions:
Doppler ultrasound. Eur Radiol 1999; 9: 428-435
27
Leen E. The role of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in the
characterisation of focal liver lesions. Eur Radiol
2001; 11(Suppl 3): E27-34
28
Ramnarine KV, Kyriakopoulou K, Gordon P, McDicken NW, McArdle
CS, Leen E. Improved characterization of focal
liver tumors: dynamic power Doppler
imaging using NC100100 echo-enhancer. Eur J Ultrasound 2000; 11:
95-104
29
Solbiati L, Tonolini M, Cova L, Goldberg SN. The role of
contrast-enhanced ultrasound in the detection of focal
liver lesions. Eur Radiol 2001;
11(Suppl 3): E15-26
30
Catalano O, Esposito M, Lobianco R, Cusati B, Altei F, Siani
A. Hepatocellular carcinoma treated with
chemoembolization: assessment with
contrast-enhanced doppler ultrasonography. Cardiovasc
Intervent
Radiol 1999; 22: 486-492
31
Blomley M, Albrecht T, Cosgrove D, Jayaram V, Butler-Barnes
J, Echersley R. Stimulated acoustic emission in
liver parenchyma with Levovist.
Lancet 1998; 351: 568
Edited
by
Wu
XN and Wang XL
| |