|
Li
Zhu, Department of Anesthesiology, Naval General Hospital, Beijing
100037, China
Zong-Cheng Yang, Institute of Burn Research, Southwest Hospital,
Third Military Medical University, Chongqing 400038, China
De-Chang Chen, Department of Critical Care Medicine, Peking Union
Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences,
Beijing 100730, China
Supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China, No.
30290700
Correspondence to: Dr. Zhu Li, Department of Anesthesiology,
Naval General Hospital, Beijing 100037, China.
zlicu@mail.china.com
Telephone: +86-10-68589503
Received: 2003-04-02
Accepted: 2003-05-19
Abstract
AIM: To investigate the protective effects of early enteral
feeding (EEF) on postburn impairments of renal function and their
possible mechanisms.
METHODS:
Wistar rats with 30 % of total body surface area (TBSA)
full-thickness burn were adopted as the experimental model. The
effects of EEF on the postburn changes of gastric intramucosal pH (pHi),
endotoxin levels in portal vein, water contents of renal tissue, and
blood concentrations of tumor necrosis factor (TNF-a),
urea nitrogen (BUN), creatinine (Cr), as well as the changes of
clearance of creatinine (CCr) were dynamically observed within 48 h
postburn.
RESULTS:
EEF could significantly improve gastric mucosal acidosis, reduce
portal vein endotoxin levels and water contents of renal tissue, as
well as blood concentrations of TNF-a
after severe burns (P<0.01). The postburn elevations of
BUN and BCr were not found to be recovered by EEF. However, the CCr
in EEF group was greatly increased by 4.67-fold compared with that
of the non-feeding burned control (16.43±2.90 vs. 3.52±0.79, P<0.01).
CONCLUSION:
EEF has beneficial effects on the improvement of renal function in
severely burned rats, which may be related to its increase of
splanchnic blood flow, decrease of the translocation of gut-origin
endotoxin and the release of inflammatory mediators.
Zhu
L, Yang ZC, Chen DC. Improvements of postburn renal function by
early enteral feeding and their possible mechanisms in rats. World J
Gastroenterol 2003;
9(7): 1545-1549
http://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/9/1545.asp
INTRODUCTION
Acute renal failure (ARF) is one of the well-known complications
after severe burns with an extremely high incidence of death[1-4].
In most circumstances, it manifests as a part of multiorgan
dysfunction syndrome[5, 6] and the kidney-oriented
supportive therapy so far has not achieved satisfactory results[6,
7]. In recent years, abundant researches have suggested that
the translocation of gut-origin endotoxin in certain pathological
conditions may lead to remote organ injury[8, 9], which
may also be the major contributor to renal dysfunction[10-13].
Meanwhile, it has become increasingly apparent that early enteral
feeding (EEF) in various groups of patients could produce multiple
beneficial effects, including increase of blood flow to the
splanchnic organs, maintenance of gut mucosal integrity, prevention
of intramucosal acidosis and permeability disturbances, and
alleviation of the translocation of gut-origin bacteria and endotxin[14-19].
We therefore presume that EEF might be possible to improve renal
function injured by severe burns, which up to now has been seldom
documented. Thus, the present study was designed to demonstrate this
hypothesis, in attempt to seek ways to improve the treatment of
severely injured patients, which would be no doubt of both
theoretical and practical importance.
MATERIALS
AND METHODS
Animals
Healthy adult Wistar rats of both sexes, weighing 22030 g,
were employed in the study. They were housed in individual metabolic
cages in a temperature conditioned room (22-24 °C) with a 12 h light-dark circle, allowed access to standard rat
chow (provided by experimental animal center, Third Military Medical
University) and water ad libium, and acclimatized to the
surroundings for 7 days prior to the experiments.
Operative
procedure
All animals were weighed and anesthetized with 1 %
pentobarbitale sodium (30 mg/kg, ip). After laparotomy, a
polyethylene catheter (1.5 mm in diameter) was inserted into
duodenum on the anterior wall 1.5 cm from pylorus via a puncture
hole made by a metal needle for enteral feeding. The catheter was
appropriately fixed, tunneled under the skin and exited through the
nape skin. The animals were housed and fed as described above after
operation.
Burn
injury and resuscitation
After a recovery period of 24 h, the animals inserted with a
feeding tube were anesthetized, having their dorsal hair shaved and
placed in a wooden template designed to expose 30 % of the total
body surface area (TBSA), and then immersed in water at 92 °C for 20 seconds, which resulted in a clearly demarcated
full-thickness burn. One hour after burn injury, the animals were
resuscitated with 10 ml of warm 0.9 % NaCl (normal saline solution,
37 °C) given by intraperitoneal injection. Control animals were
similarly anesthetized, shaved, resuscitated but not burned.
Feeding and experimental protocol
Nutrient feeding liquid was prepared as one with a caloric
of 2.1 KJ/ml before use by mixing nutritional powder (ENSURE, USA)
with an appropriate amount of warm boiled water. According to
different feeding regimens, the animals were randomly divided into
three groups: (1) EEF group. Enteral feeding was initiated 1 h
postburn in burned animals via a feeding tube with a total caloric
of 202 KJ.kg-1.24
h-1. The feeding nutrient liquid required for 24 hours
was administered evenly at 6 time points. (2) Burn group. The
animals were treated exactly the same as EEF group, except that the
nutrient feeding liquid was substituted for the same amount of
saline. (3) Control group. Only the feeding tube was inserted,
whereas no tube feeding and burn were conducted. The animals in this
group were allowed access to standard rat chow, nutrition liquid and
water ad libium. Time points for different measurements and assays
in all groups were made at 3, 6, 12, 24 and 48 h postburn, except
for the determination of renal tissue water content, which was
performed at 12 h after thermal injury. 24-hr urine was collected
for the detection of urea nitrogen and creatinine that were used to
calculate CCr. For plasma assays, rats were sacrificed by
decapitation at each time point and heparinised blood was collected
in a separator tube spun at 3 000 g for 10 min, decanted and frozen
at -20 °C until analysis.
Measurements
The gastric intramucosal pH was determined with an indirect
method as previously described[20] with minor
modifications. Briefly, the animals were anesthetized and injected
cimetidine (15 mg) intraperitoneally 1 h prior to each time point, a
polyethylene catheter was inserted into gastric lumen through
pylorus via a puncture hole on the anterior wall of duodenum made by
a metal needle after a midline laparotomy. A 2.5-ml of normal saline
was injected into gastric lumen though the catheter and removed in
order to get rid of intragastric residues, then 1.5-ml of normal
saline was injected and retained in the gastric lumen. After an
equilibration interval of 60 min, 1 ml of saline solution was
aspirated and PCO2 was determined using the blood gas
analyzer. A simultaneously obtained arterial blood sample was used
to determine the [HCO3-]. pHi was then
calculated as:
pHi=6.1+log ([HCO3-] / [PCO2×0.03])
The multifunction-biochemical analyzer Beckman Synchron CX-7 was
employed to detect urea nitrogen and creatinine in both blood and
urine.
Portal
plasma endotoxin levels were assayed with the
limulus-amoebocyte-lysate test (LAL)[21]. Briefly, plasma
samples were diluted tenfold with pyrogen-free water and heated to
75 °C for 5 min to overcome assay inhibition by plasma. The samples
were incubated with LAL for 33 min at 37 °C. Then the chromogenic substrate was added and the samples was
incubated for another 3 min. After the reaction was stopped with
acetic acid, sample optical density was read at 545 nm and the
endotoxin concentration was finally expressed as Eu/ml.
Radioimmunoassay
of TNF-a
levels in systemic circulation was conducted according to the
instructions with kits from Dong-Ya Research Institute of
Immunotechnology.
Renal
tissue water contents were determined with a method as reported in a
previous study[22] with minor modifications. Eight renal
tissue samples for each group were harvested at 12 h postburn,
weighed and put in an oven at 90 °C for 24 h, then weighed again. The renal tissue water contents
were calculated as:
Renal tissue water contents=(wet weight - dry weight / wet weight)×100 %
Statistical
analysis
Experimental results were analyzed by analysis of variance
and t-tests for multiple comparisons. Data were expressed as mean standard error of the mean. Statistical significance was
determined at P<0.05.
RESULTS
BUN and BCr in both EEF and Burn groups were significantly
increased postburn with the peak value at 6 h. Though gradually
decreased thereafter, they were still significantly higher than
those of the control at 24 and 48 h time points (P<0.01).
The beneficial effects of EEF on the renal function manifested as
the improvement of CCr, in which a 4.67-fold increase was observed
in EEF group as compared with burn group and the CCr value in EEF
group tended to be close to that in the control (Table 1).
Gastric
mucosal acidosis was significantly improved in EEF group as
indicated by the elevation of gastric pHi at most of the postburn
time points, however, gastric pHi in burn group was sustained in
lower levels until 48 h postburn (Table 2).
Table
3 displays the changes in portal endotoxin levels after severe
burns. Three hours postburn, endotoxin concentration was
significantly increased in burn group and peaked at 6 h, another
increase appeared at 24 h and persisted until 48 h postburn.
However, the portal endotoxin levels in animals that received EEF
markedly decreased at almost all time points as compared with that
of the burn group.
The
data for plasma TNF-a
levels are shown in Table 4. In accordance with other observations,
EEF could also significantly reduce TNF-a
levels in systemic circulation at most postburn time points as
compared with that of burnt animals.
For
EEF, burn and control groups of animals, the renal tissue water
contents reached 75.360.99 %, 78.941.56 % and 76.261.25 %
respectively (Figure 1). It was evident that a significant decrease
of renal tissue water content was seen in EEF group compared with
that in burn group at 12 h postburn (P<0.01).
Table
1
Effects of EEF on postburn changes of BUN, BCr and CCr (
)
| Group |
Samples |
Postbun
hours (h) |
| 3 |
6 |
12 |
24 |
48 |
| EEF |
40 |
|
|
|
|
|
| BUN
(mmol/L) |
|
10.30±0.67a
d |
17.67±1.52b
d |
13.73±1.43d |
8.73±2.10d |
7.50±1.16d |
| BCr
(mmol /L) |
|
53.77±3.20d |
89.60±6.54b
d |
55.44±3.57d |
46.95±2.66d |
42.90±2.23d |
| CCr
(ml/h/100g) |
|
|
|
|
16.43±
2.90 b |
|
| Burn |
40 |
|
|
|
|
|
| BUN
(mmol/L) |
|
11.76±1.72d |
15.42±1.74d |
13.48±1.56d |
9.27±1.75d |
7.68±1.63d |
| BCr
(mmol /L) |
|
51.80±2.83d |
71.23±2.63d |
57.70±4.93d |
44.75±1.69d |
41.76±1.26d |
| CCr
(ml/h/100g) |
|
|
|
|
3.52
±0.79d |
|
| Control |
40 |
|
|
|
|
|
| BUN
(mmol/L) |
|
4.67±0.85 |
4.49±0.58 |
4.74±0.80 |
4.31±0.69 |
4.52±0.93 |
| BCr
(mmol /L) |
|
37.43±3.64 |
37.67±3.26 |
37.28±4.42 |
36.94±3.71 |
37.69±3.
47 |
| CCr
(ml/h/100g) |
|
|
|
|
19.45±2.21 |
|
aP<0.05,
bP<0.01
vs Burn group; cP<0.05,
dP<0.01
vs Control.
Table
2 Effects of EEF on
postburn changes of gastric intramucosal pH (
)
| Group |
Samples |
Postbun
hours (h) |
| 3 |
6 |
12 |
24 |
48 |
| EEF |
50 |
7.119±0.078ab |
6.943±0.089ab |
7.074±0.037ab |
7.285±0.098a |
7.257±0.077ab |
| Burn |
50 |
7.017±0.037b |
6.826±0.049b |
6.802±0.080b |
6.949±0.082b |
7.074±0.041b |
| Control |
50 |
7.321±0.054 |
7.296±0.067 |
7.343±0.045 |
7.306±0.069 |
7.348±0.074 |
aP<0.01
vs Burn group; bP<0.01
vs Control.
Table
3 Effects
of EEF on postburn changes of portal endotoxin level (Eu/ml,
)
| Group |
Samples |
Postbun
hours (h) |
| 3 |
6 |
12 |
24 |
48 |
| EEF |
40 |
0.683±0.072ab |
0.797±0.085ab |
0.542±0.078ab |
0.725±0.061ab |
0.461±0.049ab |
| Burn |
40 |
1.394±0.126b |
1.518±0.173b |
1.124±0.133b |
1.627±0.215b |
1.168±0.188b |
| Control |
40 |
0.206±0.032 |
0.195±0.043 |
0.189±0.049 |
0.204±0.037 |
0.215±0.051 |
aP<0.01
vs Burn group; bP<0.01
vs Control.
Table
4 Effects
of EEF on postburn changes of plasma TNF-a
level (ng/ml,
)
| Group |
Samples |
Postbun
hours (h) |
| 3 |
6 |
12 |
24 |
48 |
| EEF |
40 |
1.48±0.38ab |
2.57±0.45ab |
2.36±0.47ab |
1.92±0.26ab |
1.68±0.45ab |
| Burn |
40 |
1.92±0.19b |
4.49±0.47b |
3.51±0.45b |
4.07±0.71b |
3.24±0.61b |
| Control |
40 |
0.83±0.08 |
0.78±0.11 |
0.83±0.12 |
0.81±0.09 |
0.85±0.10 |
aP<0.01
vs Burn group; bP<0.01
vs Control.
Figure
1(PDF) Effects of EEF on
water content of renal tissue 12 h postburn.
DISCUSSION
Nutritional support plays an important role in the management of
critically ill patients to prevent and treat multiple organ
dysfunction syndrome (MODS)[23]. Numerous clinical and
animal studies have demonstrated that early enteral feeding could
preserve the gut barrier function, diminish hypermetabolic response,
maintain caloric intake, reduce the chance of gut origin infection
and significantly shorten hospital stay following injury[14-19].
Unfortunately, the protective effects of EEF on the splanchnic
function after severe traumas were relatively neglected in most of
these investigations.
In a
previous study, Roberts and his associates[24] observed
that acute impairment of renal function inflicted by rhabdomyolysis
was improved with EEF. Through 72 h dynamic observation, they found
both BUN and BCr in EEF rats decreased by 65.7 % and 60 %
respectively and the mortality reduced by 43 % compared with that of
the animals fed with water. In contrast, in present animal model of
severely thermal injury, BUN and BCr in both EEF and burn groups
were significantly elevated, and no effect of EEF on the postburn
changes of these variables was noted. We conjecture
the phenomenon might be attributed to the more severity of
the injury, difference in feeding components and blood condensation
postburn. It has been reported that CCr could correlate well with
the inulin clearance and exhibit renal function more accurately in
the presence of acute renal failure[25]. In a animal
study on renal dysfunction caused by ischemia, Mouser and his
colleagues[25] demonstrated that the percentage of CCr
increment in enterally fed animals was 2.5-fold higher than that in
animals fed intravenously, whereas no significant changes of BUN and
BCr were observed, showing that the improvement of renal function
would not be always in accordance with BUN and BCr changes. In the
present study, CCr in EEF animals increased by 4.67-fold compared
with that in burn group, indicating that EEF could exert protective
effects on the postburn renal impairment, and that aborative
attention should be paid to the selection of proper variables to
perform such investigations.
The
mechanisms of EEF to improve posttrauma renal function so far have
not been clarified yet. It was once considered that the enhanced
feeding of certain nutrients such as proteins or amino acids might
increase the glomerular filtration rate (GFR). However, Mouser et
al.[25] have shown that even with the same kind of
nutrients, CCr in intravenously fed animals with renal ischemia was
significantly lower than that in enterally fed animals, suggesting
that the enteric factors beyond nutrients play a role in the
improvement of impaired renal function. In fact, in severe traumas
including burn, loss of large amount body fluids and release of
stress hormones caused a sharp reduce of blood flow to many organs,
especially the gastrointestinal tract and the kidney. Reduced
intestinal blood flow then led to translocation of bacteria and/or
their toxic products through the gut mucosa. Subsequent bacteria-
and/or toxin-induced persistent and excessive release of cytokines
(i.e. tumor necrosis factor, interleukins) and complement activation
initiated progressive multiple organ failure and even caused death[26,
27]. In accordance with this theory, numerous studies have
proposed that the renal ischemia and endotoxemia occurred in various
pathological conditions be the major contributors to the renal
dysfunction[10-13, 28-30].
Postprandial
gut hyperemia is a locally mediated vascular response to the
presence of foodstuff in the lumen, an important physiological
phenomenon for food digestion and absorption. Even though in some
pathological conditions, this phenomenon still exists. In burned
guinea pigs, Inoue et al[31] using radiolabeled
microspheres demonstrated that blood flow to the jejunum and cecum
was higher in the diet group than in the control during initial 24 h
of enteral feeding. In a dog model of splanchnic ischemia induced
with endotoxin, Eleftheriadis et al.[32] reported
that portal vein, hepatic and superior mesenteric artery blood flow,
hepatic and intestinal microcirculation, hepatic tissue PO2
and energy charge, and intestinal intramucosal pH were significantly
increased after early enteral feeding, which were all reduced in the
early septic condition. In the present study, we showed that
postburn EEF could effectively restore reduced gastric intramucosal
pH, decrease endotoxin concentrations in portal vein and TNF-a
levels in systemic circulation, as well as alleviate renal tissue
edema compared with burn controls. All the above indicate that in
addition to provision of nutritional substrates, posttrauma EEF is
most likely via a mechanism of postprandial hyperemia, to improve
gut low flow and splanchnic ischemic status, to maintain gut mucosal
integrity, and to block the vicious circle of mutual activation
between the translocation of gut origin bacteria and their toxic
products, and the release of inflammatory mediators[33],
thereby reducing hypoxic and inflammatory tissue damage. However,
detailed mechanisms are needed to be further studied.
The
facts that EEF could improve postburn renal function are of both
theoretical and practical importance. The present study revealed
that EEF should not be taken merely as a method or a route for
nutritional support. Its clinical value has exceeded the range of
nutrition and is not limited to the locally enteric benefits as
well. Although the results from the animal study can not be
extrapolated directly to humans, a better understanding of the
postburn EEF might lead to new ways for the further improvement in
prevention and treatment of MODS posttrauma.
REFERENCES
1
Holm C, Horbrand F, von Donnersmarck GH, Muhlbauer W. Acute
renal failure in severely burned patients. Burns
1999; 25: 171-178
2
Anlatici R, Ozerdem OR, Dalay C, Kesiktas E, Acarturk S,
Seydaoglu G. A retrospective analysis of 1083 Turkish
patients with serious burns. Part 2:
burn care, survival and mortality. Burns 2002; 28: 239-243
3
Kim GH, Oh KH, Yoon JW, Koo JW, Kim HJ, Chae DW, Noh JW, Kim
JH, Park YK. Impact of burn size and initial
serum albumin level on acute renal
failure occurring in major burn. Am J Nephrol 2003; 23: 55-60
4
Chrysopoulo MT, Jeschke MG, Dziewulski P, Barrow RE, Herndon
DN. Acute renal dysfunction in severely burned adults.
J Trauma 1999; 46: 141-144
5 Davies MP,
Evans J, McGonigle RJ. The dialysis debate: acute renal failure in
burns patients. Burns 1994; 20: 71-73
6
Triolo G, Mariano F, Stella M, Salomone M, Magliacani G.
Dialytic therapy in severely burnt patients with acute
renal failure. G Ital Nefrol 2002;
19: 155-159
7 Tremblay R,
Ethier J, Querin S, Beroniade V, Falardeau P, Leblanc M. Veno-venous
continuous renal replacement
therapy for burned patients with
acute renal failure. Burns 2000; 26: 638-643
8 Turnage RH,
Guice KS, Oldham KT. Endotoxemia and remote organ injury following
intestinal reperfusion. J Surg
Res 1994; 56: 571-578
9
LaNoue JL Jr, Turnage RH, Kadesky KM, Guice KS, Oldham KT,
Myers SI. The effect of intestinal reperfusion on
renal function and perfusion. J Surg
Res 1996; 64: 19-25
10
Yamaguchi H, Kita T,
Sato H, Tanaka N. Escherichia coli endotoxin enhances acute renal
failure in rats after
thermal injury. Burns 2003; 29:
133-138
11 Yokota M, Kambayashi
J, Tahara H, Kawasaki T, Shiba E, Sakon M, Mori T. Renal
insufficiency induced by
locally administered endotoxin in
rabbits. Methods Find Exp Clin Pharmacol 1990; 12: 487-491
12
Heyman SN, Rosen S,
Darmon D, Goldfarb M, Bitz H, Shina A, Brezis M. Endotoxin-induced
renal failure. II. A role
for tubular hypoxic damage. Exp
Nephrol 2000; 8: 275-282
13 Zager RA. Escherichia
coli endotoxin injections potentiate experimental ischemic renal
injury. Am J Physiol
1986; 251: F988-994
14 Yamaguchi H, Kita T,
Sato H, Tanaka N. Escherichia coli endotoxin enhances acute renal
failure in rats after
thermal injury. Burns 2003; 29:
133-138
15 Hanna MK, Kudsk KA.
Nutritional and pharmacological enhancement of gut-associated
lymphoid tissue. Can J
Gastroenterol 2000; 14(Suppl):
145D-151D
16 Fukatsu K, Zarzaur BL,
Johnson CD, Lundberg AH, Wilcox HG, Kudsk KA. Enteral nutrition
prevents remote organ injury
and death after a gut ischemic
insult. Ann Surg 2001; 233: 660-668
17 Alexander JW. Is early
enteral feeding of benefit? Intensive Care Med 1999; 25: 129-130
18 Kompan L, Kremzar B,
Gadzijev E, Prosek M. Effects of early enteral nutrition on
intestinal permeability and
the development of multiple organ
failure after multiple injury. Intensive Care Med 1999; 25: 157-161
19
Eleftheriadis E. Role
of enteral nutrition-induced splanchnic hyperemia in ameliorating
splanchnic ischemia. Nutrition
1999; 15: 247-248
20 Noc M, Weil MH, Sun S,
Gazmuri RJ, Tang W, Pakula JL. Comparison of gastric luminal and
gastric wall PCO2
during hemorrhagic shock. Circ Shock
1993; 40: 194-199
21 Buttenschoen K, Berger
D, Hiki N, Strecker W, Seidelmann M, Beger HG. Plasma concentrations
of endotoxin
and antiendotoxin antibodies in
patients with multiple injuries: a prospective clinical study. Eur J
Surg
1996; 162: 853-860
22 Jiang DJ, Tao JY, Xu
SY. Inhibitory effects of clonidine on edema formation after thermal
injury in mice and rats.
Zhongguo Yaoli Xuebao 1989; 10:
540-542
23 Bengmark S, Gianotti
L. Nutritional support to prevent and treat multiple organ failure.
World J Surg 1996, 20: 474-481
24 Roberts PR, Black KW,
Zaloga GD. Enteral feeding improves outcome and protects against
glycerol-induced acute
renal failure in the rat. Am J Respir
Crit Care Med 1997; 156: 1265-1269
25 Mouser JF, Hak EB,
Kuhl DA, Dickerson RN, Gaber LW, Hak LJ. Recovery from ischemic
acute renal failure is improved
with enteral compared with parenteral
nutrition. Crit Care Med 1997; 25: 1748-1754
26 Vincent JL. Prevention
and therapy of multiple organ failure. World J Surg 1996; 20:
465-470
27 Pastores SM, Katz DP,
Kvetan V. Splanchnic ischemia and gut mucosal injury in sepsis and
the multiple organ
dysfunction syndrome. Am J
Gastroenterol 1996; 91: 1697-1710
28 Lugon JR, Boim MA,
Ramos OL, Ajzen H, Schor N. Renal function and glomerular
hemodynamics in male endotoxemic
rats. Kidney Int 1989; 36: 570-575
29 Van Lambalgen AA, Van
Kraats AA, Van den Bos GC, Stel HV, Straub J, Donker AJ, Thijs LG.
Renal function
and metabolism during endotoximia in
rats: role of hypotention. Circ Shock 1991; 35: 164-173
30 Begany DP, Carcillo
JA, Herzer WA, Mi Z, Jackson EK. Inhibition of type IV
phosphodiesterase by Ro 20-1724
attenuates endotoxin-induced acute
renal failure. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 1996; 278: 37-41
31 Inoue S, Lukes S,
Alexander JW, Trocki O, Silberstein EB. Increased gut blood flow
with early enteral feeding in
burned guinea pigs. J Burn Care
Rehabil 1989; 10: 300-308
32 Eleftheriadis E,
Kazamias P, Kotzampassi K, Koufogiannis D. Influence of enteral
nutrition-induced splanchnic
hyperemia on the septic origin of
splanchnic ischemia. World J Surg 1998; 22: 6-11
33 Gianotti L, Alexander
JW, Nelson JL, Fukushima R, Pyles T, Chalk CL. Role of early enteral
feeding and acute
starvation on postburn bacterial
translocation and host defense: prospective, randomized trials. Crit
Care Med
1994; 22: 265-272
Edited
by Zhang
JZ and Wang XL
| |