|
M.
Francesca Jaboli, Stefania Liva, Francesco Azzaroli, Giovanni Nigro,
Silvia Giovanelli, Francesco Ferrara, Anna Miracolo, Sabrina
Marchetto, Marco Montagnani, Antonio Colecchia, Enrico Roda,
Mazzella Giuseppe, Department of Internal Medicine and
Gastroenterology, University of Bologna, Italy
Carlo Fabbri, Department of Gastroenterology and Gastrointestinal
Endoscopy, Bellaria Hospital, Bologna, Italy
Davide Festi, Department of Medicine and Aging, University of Chieti,
Italy
Letizia Bacchi Reggiani, Department of Cardiology, University of
Bologna, Italy
Correspondence to: Professor Giuseppe Mazzella, Department of
Internal Medicine and Gastroenterology, University of Bologna,
Ospedale S. Orsola- Malpighi, via Massarenti 9, 40138 Bologna,
Italy. mazzella@med.unibo.it
Telephone: +39-51-6363276
Fax: +39-51-300700
Received: 2003-02-25
Accepted: 2003-03-16
Abstract
AIM: To investigate the safety and efficacy of long-term
combination therapy with alpha interferon and lamivudine in
non-responsive patients with anti-HBe-positive chronic hepatitis B.
METHODS:
34 patients received combination treatment (1 month lamivudine, 12
month lamivudine+interferon, 6 month lamivudine), 24 received
lamivudine (12 months), 24 received interferon (12 months).
Interferon was administered at 6 MU tiw and lamivudine at 100 mg
orally once daily. Patients were followed up for 6 months after
treatment.
RESULTS:
At the end of treatment, HBV DNA negativity rates were 88 % with
lamivudine+interferon, 99 % with lamivudine and 55 % with
interferon, (P=0.004, combination therapy vs. interferon, and
P=0.001 lamivudine vs. interferon), and serum transaminase
normalization rates were 84 %, 91 % and 53 % (P=0.01
combination therapy vs. interferon, and P=0.012 lamivudine
vs. interferon). Six months later, HBV DNA negativity rates were 44
% with lamivudine+interferon, 33 % with lamivudine and 25 % with
interferon, and serum transaminase normalization rates were 61 %, 42
% and 45 %, respectively, without statistical significance. No YMDD
variants were observed with lamivudine+interferon (vs. 12 % with
lamivudine). The combination therapy appeared to be safe.
CONCLUSION:
Although viral clearance and transaminase normalization are slower
with long-term lamivudine+interferon than that with lamivudine
alone, the combination regimen seems to provide more lasting
benefits and to protect against the appearance of YMDD variants.
Studies with other regimens regarding sequence and duration are
needed.
Jaboli
MF, Fabbri C, Liva S, Azzaroli F, Nigro G, Giovanelli S, Ferrara F,
Miracolo A, Marchetto S, Montagnani M, Colecchia A, Festi D,
Reggiani LB, Roda E, Mazzella G. Long-term alpha interferon and
lamivudine combination therapy in non-responder patients with anti-HBe-positive
chronic hepatitis B: Results of an open, controlled trial. World J
Gastroenterol 2003; 9(7): 1491-1495
http://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/9/1491.asp
INTRODUCTION
Chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection remains a major
worldwide public health problem. Over 300 million people are
affected by the disease[1], which is associated with high
mortality and morbidity due to the associated risk of cirrhosis and
hepatocellular carcinoma[2]. In addition, HBV infection
is becoming an increasingly relevant problem for transplanted and
immunodeficient patients, who are prone to develop more severe,
accelerated liver disease[3].
Until
recently, interferon-a
(IFN) was the only drug approved throughout the world for chronic
HBV infection[4,5]. Unfortunately, relapse with return of
viremia and hepatitis occurs in up to 50 % of cases[6].
The hepatitis B s antigen (HBsAg) may become negative in months to
years after the end of treatment, suggesting total viral clearance[7].
IFN is less effective in the presence of HBeAg negativity[8],
or in patients who have already developed cirrhosis or have had
recurrence of HBV after a hepatic allograft.
Lamivudine
(3TC) is the first potentially non-cytotoxic[9,10] oral
nucleoside analogue approved for the treatment of chronic hepatitis
B. It suppresses viral DNA replication by means of chain
termination, and competitively inhibits viral polymerase, but does
not act on supercoiled DNA. For these reasons, lamivudine rapidly
reduces serum HBV DNA, enhances transaminase normalization, and
improves the histological picture[11-13]. But only 16 %
achieve full HBeAg seroconversion, and after suspension of therapy
serum HBV DNA levels and transaminases generally return to
pretreatment values[14]. Furthermore, after clearance of
HBV DNA, mutations in the sequence of the YMDD locus of the HBV
RNA-dependent DNA polymerase appear in 15 % of cases after one year
of therapy, leading to recurrence of viremia[15]. Onset
of resistance generally occurs after six months to several years of
lamivudine therapy[16].
Combination
therapy with IFN and lamivudine is being investigated in order to
take advantage of the drugs' different mechanisms of action[17-21].
However, the results of short-term treatment studies have been not
altogether encouraging[18]. The aim of the present study
was to investigate whether long-term combination therapy was safe
and well tolerated, and whether it could provide additional
therapeutic benefits with respect to either of the single drug
regimens. In particular, we set out to evaluate efficacy in terms of
primary and sustained viremia and transaminase responses. We also
assessed histological response, incidence of YMDD-variant HBV, and
safety.
MATERIALS
AND METHODS
Patients
This open trial concerned 82 adult Italian patients with
chronic anti-HBe positive hepatitis B (68 males, 14 females)
enrolled between February 1997 and February 1999 who had either not
responded to or had relapsed after previous interferon treatment.
The experimental protocol was carried out in accordance with the
Helsinki Declaration, and was approved by the Ethics Review
Committee, and all patients gave written informed consent to
participate in a trial involving long-term treatment either with
interferon plus lamivudine or with lamivudine or interferon alone.
Inclusion
criteria for the study were: age between 18 and 70 years, detectable
hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) in serum at the time of
screening and for at least six months before the start of the study,
serum HBV DNA levels of at least 5 pg/ml at screening, raised
alanine transaminase values within three months before the start of
therapy. Exclusion criteria were: presence of co-infection with
hepatitis C and D virus or HIV, signs of hepatic decompensation or
hepatocellular carcinoma, other possible causes of chronic liver
damage (i.e. alcohol abuse, hemochromatosis, Wilson's disease,
a1-antitrypsin deficiency, autoimmune diseases, drug-induced
hepatotoxicity and congestive heart failure), assumption of
immunosuppressive or antiviral therapy within six months before the
study. Needle biopsy performed in all cases within 2 years of the
study, showed that 33 patients had a Scheuer score for fibrosis
>3.
The
patients were divided into three groups: group A (n=34) for
combination treatment, group B (n=24) for treatment with
lamivudine alone, group C (n=24) for treatment with
interferon alone.
Treatment
protocols and study design
Patients in group A received 100 mg/day of lamivudine (Glaxo-Wellcome
Inc, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA) orally for one month, followed
by lamivudine (100 mg/day) in association with six million units
three times per week of natural interferon (Wellferon,
Glaxo-Wellcome Inc, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA) for twelve
months, and then lamivudine (100 mg/day) alone for six months.
Patients in group B received lamivudine (100 mg/day) orally for
twelve months. Patients in group C received six million units three
times per week of natural interferon for twelve months. Interferon
was administered subcutaneously by the patients after adequate
training. Patients were followed up after the end treatment for
twenty-four weeks. All patients had a liver biopsy within 2 years of
entering the study, and were requested to have another at the end of
treatment. Hepatitis flare up was defined as an increase in serum
ALT during therapy and classified as mild, moderate or severe
(>1.5, 5, 10 times respectively) according to the preceding ALT
value.
The
main end point of the study was to evaluate the end-of-treatment and
sustained response, defined as HBV DNA loss and serum ALT
normalization at the end of therapy and follow-up, respectively.
Secondary variables included histological response, incidence of
YMDD-variant HBV, and safety.
Laboratory
methods
Blood samples were obtained immediately before therapy,
after 15 days, and then every month during treatment and follow-up.
Routine biochemical tests and blood cell counts were performed.
HBsAg, HBeAg, and anti-HBs and anti-HBe antibodies were determined
by enzyme immunoassay. Serum HBV DNA was measured quantitatively by
a solution-hybridization assay (Abbott, Chicago, USA) with a lower
limit of 3.0 pg/ml of serum.
Presence
of the YMDD variant was evaluated by a restriction fragment length
polymorphism assay in all ends of treatment samples and in cases
where initial loss of HBV DNA was followed by a return to positivity,
regardless of transaminase values. The biopsy specimens were scored
according to the Scheuer histological activity index[22].
Statistical
analysis
Baseline characteristics of the patients were presented as
mean values ± standard error (SE). Statistical evaluations were
conducted according to the intention-to-treat procedure. The
Chi-square test or the Fisher's exact test was used to compare
differences in proportion between treatment groups. Continuous data
were analyzed using Kruskall-Wallis test and Mann-Whitney test. A
two-tailed P value of less than 0.05 was considered to be
statistically significant.
RESULTS
Study population
All treatment arms were well matched with regard to baseline
characteristics (Table 1). Of the 82 patients, 79 completed the
treatment schedule, while the remaining 3 dropped out of the study:
one group A patient withdrew, one group B patient and one group C
patient experienced depression.
Table
1 Baseline
characteristics of patients
| Characteristics |
Lamivudine+
interferon(n=34) |
Lamivudine
alone(n=24) |
Interferon
alone(n=24) |
| Age
(year) |
44.0±2.0 |
48.7±2.4 |
44.4±2.5 |
| Sex
(m/f) |
30/4 |
18/6 |
20/4 |
| ALT
(U/l) |
151±21 |
160±39 |
130±17 |
| AST
(U/l) |
81±10 |
111±37 |
66±10 |
| GT
(U/l) |
48±3 |
57±6 |
47±3 |
| Albumin
(gr/dl) |
3.94±0.04 |
3.97±0.04 |
4.01±0.03 |
| HBV
DNA (pg/ml) |
60±25 |
85±43 |
73±36 |
| Histology: |
|
|
|
| Cirrhosis |
13
(38%) |
10
(42%) |
10
(42%) |
| Severe
activity |
10
(29%) |
7
(29%) |
9
(37%) |
P
value was not significant for all comparisons.
Virological
response (Figure 1)
End-of-treatment response
HBV DNA negativity was observed at the end of treatment in 30
(88 %) patients who received combination therapy (i.e. group A), 23
(99 %) who had lamivudine alone (i.e. group B), and 13 (55 %) who
had interferon alone (i.e. group C). HBV DNA negativity was achieved
in week 12, 4 and 32, respectively, in the three groups. Two
differences in primary response among the three groups were highly
significant [combination vs. interferon: OR 6.34 (95 % CI: 1.7-23
%), P=0.004; lamivudine vs. interferon: OR 19.46 (95 % CI:
3.3-113 %), P=0.001].
Sustained response A
total of 15 (44 %) patients in group A, 8 (33 %) in group B and 6
(25 %) in group C were HBV DNA negative at the end of the follow-up.
None of the differences in sustained virological response among the
three groups reached statistical significance.
Biochemical
response (Figure 2)
End-of-treatment response
Serum transaminases became normal at the end of treatment in
29 (84 %) patients in group A, 21 (91 %) in group B and 13 (53 %) in
group C [combination vs. interferon: OR 4.9 (95 % CI: 1.4-17 %), P=0.01;
lamivudine vs. interferon: OR 5.92 (95 % CI: 1.28-25.3 %), P=0.012].
Normalization was achieved in week 20, 8 and 38, respectively, in
the three groups. A mild flare-up without bilirubin alteration was
observed only in 8 group A patients. In all cases, serum
transaminase normalization was preceded by a rise of HBV DNA at 2-8
months of therapy. The flare-up was always followed 1-2 months later
by serum HBV DNA negativization and transaminase normalization. None
of these patients had a YMDD variant.
Sustained response Sustained
serum transaminase normalization was observed in 21 (61 %) patients
in group A, 10 (42 %) in group B and 11 (45 %) in group C. None of
the differences in sustained transaminase response among the three
groups had statistical significance. Only 4 of the 8 patients who
experienced a flare-up during combined therapy mantained their
primary response.
Figure
1(PDF) Virological response. Percentages of patients with
HBV DNA negativity related either to the treatment or to the
follow-up times. The vertical lines were drawn at the end of each
treatment (19 months for interferon and lamivudine in combination,
and 12 months for lamivudine and interferon monotherapy).
Figure 2(PDF)
Biochemical response. Percentages of patients with normal ALT
levels related either to the treatment or to the follow-up times.
The vertical lines were drawn at the end of each treatment (19
months for interferon and lamivudine in combination, and 12 months
for lamivudine and interferon monotherapy).
Secondary
criteria of efficacy
Histological findings Paired
pre- and post-treatment liver biopsies were available for 22 (65 %),
15 (62 %) and 14 (58 %) patients in groups A, B and C, respectively.
None of the post-treatment biopsies showed a worsening or unchanged
histological picture. Significant improvements in necro-inflammatory
activity in parenchyma (P<0.01) and portal space (P<0.01)
were observed in each group. Significant improvements in fibrosis
were found in groups A and B (P<0.05), but not in group C.
Incidence of YMDD variant HBV
YMDD variants of HBV were not detected in any of the patients
who received combination or IFN therapy. 3 of the 24 (12 %) patients
treated with lamivudine alone had a YMDD variant after 6-9 months of
therapy. In particular, two had a YVDD variant and the other had a
YIDD variant. They continued lamivudine therapy and were monitored
weekly. After a progressive rise of serum HBV DNA, two of the
patients showed 5 times of elevation of transaminases (with respect
to the upper limit) and another showed 1.5 times of elevation.
However, after the emergence of the variant, the HBV DNA and
transaminase levels always remained lower than the baseline.
Safety
The whole treatment program was completed by 33 (98 %), 23
(96 %) and 23 (94 %) patients in groups A, B and C, respectively. No
patient received reduced dosage but we directly stopped treatment.
The side effects of the combination regimen were generally similar
to those of interferon treatment. In addition, among the 34 patients
in group A, symptomatic and reversible rises in serum levels of
amylase, lipase and creatinine phosphokinase were recorded in 9 (28
%), 2 (5 %) and 1 (3 %) cases, respectively. Worsening of
pre-existing hypertriglyceridemia was recorded in 2 (7 %) cases. By
comparison, among the 24 patients in group B, lamivudine therapy was
associated with an asymptomatic and reversible rise in amylase,
lipase or creatinine phosphokinase in 6 (25 %), 1 (4 %) and 1 (4 %),
respectively. No case of hepatocellular carcinoma, liver
decompensation or death was recorded, and no patient requested
orthotopic liver transplantation (Table 2).
Table 2 Adverse
events documented during treatment
| Adverse
events |
Lamivudine+ interferon(n=34),n(%) |
Lamivudine
alone(n=24),n(%) |
Interferon
alone(n=24),n(%) |
| Influenza-like
symptoms |
24
(70%) |
none |
19
(79%) |
| Hair
loss |
8
(23%) |
none |
9
(38%) |
| Weight
loss |
5
(16%) |
none |
4
(15%) |
| Depression |
none |
1
(4%) |
1
(6%) |
| Low
white-cell count |
19
(56%) |
none |
14
(59%) |
| Low
platelet count |
14
(42%) |
none |
10
(44%) |
| Amylase
rise |
9
(28%) |
6
(25%) |
none |
| Lipase
rise |
2
(5%) |
1
(4%) |
none |
| CPK
rise |
1
(3%) |
1
(4%) |
none |
| Hypertriglyceridemia |
2
(7%) |
none |
none |
DISCUSSION
The development of effective treatment strategies for patients
with HBV remains a major clinical challenge. We investigated the
possible benefits of a long-term interferon/lamivudine combination
treatment regimen in a cohort of patients who had already received
unsuccessful treatment with interferon alone. The effects of this
long-term combination regimen were compared with single-agent
treatment with either interferon or lamivudine in three similar
groups of patients. In regard to virological response, we found that
at the end of therapy, HBV DNA had become undetectable in 88 % of
the patients receiving combination treatment, as compared with 99 %
and 55 % of those who had single-line therapy with lamivudine or
interferon, respectively. These differences in end-of-treatment
response were statistically significant in comparison of the
combination therapy and lamivudine monotherapy with interferon
monotherapy. The analysis of sustained response showed that 44 %
patients in the combination therapy group maintained DNA clearance
as compared with only 33 % in the lamivudine group and 25 % in the
interferon group. Although these differences did not have
statistical significance, there was a trend in favor of the
combination regimen. Similarly, although the end-of-treatment
transaminase normalization rate was significantly higher in the
combination treatment (84 %) group and in the lamivudine group of
patients (91 %) than that in interferon (53 %) group, the sustained
response showed a non-significant trend in favor of the combination
regimen (61 % in the combination group vs. 42 % and 45 % with
lamivudine or interferon alone, respectively).
As
has been reported for short-term treatment[23], during
our long-term combination therapy regimen there was a progressive
viral decline, whereas with single-line lamivudine therapy the HBV
DNA levels leveled off. Our data are in keeping with the concept
that lamivudine therapy is more rapid and effective on virological
and biochemical response than interferon alone or even in
combination with lamivudine. However, after discontinuation of
therapy, virological and biochemical relapses were considerably more
common with lamivudine alone than those with the combination regimen
(even though this difference did not actually reach statistical
significance). Moreover, there was a trend suggesting that
combination therapy delays relapse. The non-significant status of
these trends could be due to the relatively small cohort sizes.
Among
the two monotherapy options, interferon appeared less effective than
lamivudine. In our study, interferon provided less end-of-treatment
responses than lamivudine, and no advantages in terms of sustained
response. The relatively poor capacity of interferon monotherapy to
promote viral clearance may be explained by an inability to induce
an efficient immune response.
After
about 5 months of combination therapy, we observed a mild flare-up
in 8 patients following a rise in serum HBV DNA. The flare-up was
always followed, after a further one to two months of therapy by a
return to serum HBV DNA negativity and normalization of
transaminases. They may have been caused by enhanced immune
responses prompted by increased mutant viral replication other than
YMDD, which however were unable to permanently eradicate the virus.
As
regards the secondary criteria of response, all the patients who
underwent a post-treatment biopsy derived histological benefit in
terms of necro-inflammatory activity in parenchyma and in portal
space, regardless of their serological response. However, in keeping
with other reports[24], interferon monotherapy provided
no improvement in fibrosis.
YMDD
HBV variants were not detected in any of the patients who received
combination therapy or interferon alone. After 6-9 months of
lamivudine monotherapy, 3 (12 %) patients had YMDD, a rate similar
to that reported in Asian patients. Interferon therapy seemed to
exert a protective effect against the emergence of variants,
probably because it lowers viral replication and enhances
immunological response. In any case, in the three affected patients,
the serum HBV DNA levels did not return completely to pretreatment
levels. Thus, the mutant strains of HBV DNA that break through
during prolonged therapy with lamivudine may not be as replicative-efficient
or as pathogenic as wild-type strains. As in other reports[25],
we found that 3 to 4 months after lamivudine treatment was stopped,
there was disappearance of this HBV mutant and re-emergence of the
wild type virus. Honkoop et al.[26] observed acute
exacerbation of chronic HBV infection after withdrawal of lamivudine
therapy and concluded that the relationship between the development
of "lamivudine-withdrawal hepatitis" and the lamivudine-resistant
mutant virus was currently unclear, since both the emergence of a
lamivudine resistant viral mutant and the resurgence of wild-type
virus after withdrawal of therapy were able to induce severe
hepatitis exacerbations. Studies of rechallenge with lamivudine have
yet to be reported, and the significance of YMDD variant is being
evaluated in the ongoing follow-up clinical trials.
As regards
safety, the combination therapy was well tolerated and no serious
side effects were observed. The side effects observed during the
course of the long-term combination regimen were those that were
commonly associated with the two drugs. As expected, in the two
monotherapy groups, the incidence of drug-related adverse events was
much lower with lamivudine than that with interferon.
In
conclusion, these results suggest that for patients who have already
been unsuccessfully treated with interferon, long-term combination
therapy may have some advantages over single-line treatment with
lamivudine or interferon[27]. Other studies with other
regimens regarding dose, sequence and duration of interferon and
lamivudine are needed. Finally, correct staging of patients
according to the particular phases in the natural history of chronic
hepatitis B appears to be important to personalise patients'
management. It is possible that combinations of two[28,29]
or more nucleoside analogs may reduce the development of viral
resistance, increase overall response rates, decrease adverse
events. In general, multi-drug therapies[30] that take
advantage of different modes of action concurrently may provide a
more appropriate approach for particular subgroups of patients.
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
We are grateful to Robin MT Cooke for editing.
REFERENCES
1
Maynard JE. Hepatitis B: global importance and need for
control. Vaccine 1990; 8: (Suppl): S18-S20
2
De Jongh FE, Jansen HL, de Man RA, Hop WC, Schalm SW, van
Blankenstein M. Survival and prognostic indicators
of hepatitis B surface
antigen-positive cirrhosis of the liver. Gastroenterology 1992; 103:
1630-1635
3
Davies SE, Portmann BC, O'Grady JG, Aldis PM, Chaggar K,
Alexander GJ, Williams R. Hepatic histological findings
after transplantation for chronic
hepatitis B virus infection, including a unique pattern of fibrosing
cholestatic
hepatitis. Hepatology 1991; 13:
150-157
4
Dusheiko GM. Treatment and prevention of chronic viral
hepatitis. Pharmacol Ther 1995; 65: 47-73
5
Korenman J, Baker B, Waggoner J, Everhart JE, Di Bisceglie
AM, Hoofnagle JH. Long term remission of chronic
hepatitis B after interferon therapy.
Ann Inter Med 1991; 114: 629-634
6
Hoofnagle JH, Lau D. Chronic viral hepatitis-benefits of
current therapies. N Eng J Med 1996; 334: 1470-1471
7
Mazzella G, Saracco G, Festi D, Rosina F, Marchetto S, Jaboli
F, Sostegni R, Pezzoli A, Azzaroli F, Cancellieri
C, Montagnani M, Roda E, Rizzetto M.
Long term results with interferon therapy in chronic type B
hepatitis: a
prospective randomized trial. Am J
Gastroenterol 1999; 94: 2246-2250
8 Hadziyannis
SJ. Hepatitis B e antigen negative chronic hepatitis B: from
clinical recognition to pathogenesis and
treatment. Viral Hepatitis Rev 1995;
1: 7-15
9
Cui L, Yoon S, Schinazi RF, Sommadossi JP. Cellular and
molecular events leading to mitochondrial toxicity of 1-
(2-de-oxy-2-fluoro-1-beta-D-arabinofuranosyl)-5-iodouracil in human
liver cells. J Clin Invest 1995; 95: 555-563
10
Nicoll A, Locarini S. Review: present and future directions
in the treatment of chronic hepatitis B infection. J
Gastroenterol Hepatol 1997; 12:
843-854
11
Dienstag JL, Perrillo RP, Schiff ER, Bartholomew M, Vicary C,
Rubin M. A preliminary trial of lamivudine for
chronic hepatitis B infection. N Eng
J Med 1995; 333: 1657-1661
12
Lai CL, Chien RN, Leung NWY, eta Chang TT, Guan R, Tai DI, Ng
KY, Wu PC, Dent JC, Barber J, Stephenson SL, Gray
DF. A one year trial of lamivudine
for chronic hepatitis B. N Eng J Med 1998; 339: 61-68
13 Kweon YO, Goodman ZD,
Dienstang JL. Lamivudine decreases fibrogenesis in chronic hepatitis
B: an
immunohistochemical study of paired
liver biopsies. Hepatology 2000; 32: 870P
14
Honkoop P, de Man RA, Heitjtink RA, Schalm SW. Hepatitis B
reactivation after lamivudine. Lancet
1995; 346: 1156-1157
15
Dienstag JL, Schiff ER, Mitchell M, Casey DE Jr, Gitlin N,
Lissoos T, Gelb LD, Condreay L, Crowther L, Rubin M, Brown
N. Extended lamivudine re-treatment
for chronic hepatitis B: : maintenance of viral suppression after
discontinuation
of therapy. Hepatology 1999; 30:
1082-1087
16
Hoofnagle J. Therapy of viral hepatitis. Digestion 1998; 59:
563-578
17
Schiff E, Karayalcin S, Grimm I, Grimm IS, Perrillo RP, Husa
P, de Man RA, Goodman Z, Condreay LD, Crowther
LM, Woessner MA, McPhillips PJ, Brown
NA. Lamivudine and 24 weeks of lamivudine/interferon
combination
therapy for hepatitis B e
antigen-positive chronic hepatitis B in interferon nonresponders.
J Hepatol
2003; 38: 818-826
18
Mutimer D, Naoumov N, Honkoop P, Marinos G, Ahmed M, de Man
R, McPhillips P, Johnson M, Williams R, Elias E,
Schalm S. Combination
alpha-interferon and lamivudine therapy for
alpha-interferon-resistant chronic hepatitis
B infection: results of a pilot
study. J Hepatol 1998; 28: 923-929
19 Heathcote J, Schalm
SW, Cianciara J, G Farrell, V Feinmann, M Shermann, AP Dhillon, AE
Moorat and DF
Gray. Lamivudine and Intron A
combination treatment in patients with chronic hepatitis B
infection. EASL April,
1998, Lisbon
20
Schalm SW, Heathcote J, Cianciara J, Farrell G, Sherman M,
Willems B, Dhillon A, Moorat A, Barber J, Gray
DF. Lamivudine and alpha interferon
combination treatment of patients with chronic hepatitis B
infection: a
randomised trial. Gut 2000; 46:
562-568
21
Farrell G. Hepatitis B e antigen seroconversion: effects of
lamivudine alone or in combination with interferon alpha. J
Med Virol 2000; 61: 374-379
22
Scheuer P. Classification of chronic viral hepatitis: a need
for reassessment. J Hepatology 1991; 13: 372-374
23 van Nunen AB, Hansen
BE, Mutimer DJ. Viral kinetics during 16 weeks of interferon and
lamivudine monotherapy
versus interferon-lamivudine
combination therapy in chronic hepatitis B patients. Hepatology
2000; 32: 878
24
Brook MG, Petrovic L, McDonald JA, Scheuer PJ, Thomas HC.
Histological improvement after anti-viral treatment
for chronic hepatits B virus
infection. J Hepatol 1989; 8: 218-225
25
Chayama K, Suzuki Y, Kobayashi M, Kobayashi M, Tsubota A,
Hashimoto M, Miyano Y, Koike H, Kobayashi M, Koida
I, Arase Y, Saitoh S, Murashima N,
Ikeda K, Kumada H. Emergence and takeover of YMDD motif mutant
hepatitis B
viru during long-term lamivudine
therapy and re-takeover by wild type after cessation of therapy.
Hepatology
1998; 27: 1711-1716
26
Honkoop P, de Man RA, Niesters HGM, Zondervan PE, Schalm SW.
Acute exacerbation of chronic hepatitis B virus
infection after withdrawal of
lamivudine therapy. Hepatology 2000; 32: 635-639
27
Janssen HLA, Schalm SW, Berk L, de Man RA, Heijtink RA.
Repeated courses of
alpha-interferon for treatment of
chronic hepatitis B. J Hepatol 1993;
17(Suppl 3): S47-51
28
Perrillo R, Schiff E, Yoshida E, Statler A, Hirsch K, Wright
T, Gutfreund K, Lamy P, Murray A. Adefovir dipivoxil for
the treatment of lamivudine-resistant
hepatitis B mutants. Hepatology 2000; 32: 129-134
29
Lau GK, Tsiang M, Hou J, Yuen S, Carman WF, Zhang L, Gibbs
CS, Lam S. Combination therapy with lamivudine
and famciclovir for chronic hepatitis
B-infected Chinese patients: a viral dynamics study. Hepatology
2000; 32: 394-399
30
Marques AR, Lau DT, McKenzie R, Straus SE, Hoofnagle JH.
Combination therapy with famciclovir and a-interferon
for the treatment of chronic
hepatitis B. The J Infect Dis 1998; 178: 1483-1487
Edited
by Xu
XQ
| |