| P.O.Box 2345, Beijing 100023,China | World J Gastroenterol 2003 Jan 15;9(1):137-140 |
| Email: wcjd@public.bta.net.cn | WJG ISSN 1007-9327 CN 14-1219/ R |
| http:// www.wjgnet.com | Copyright © 2003 by The WJG Press |
Influence of intrauterine injection of rat fetal hepatocytes on rejection of rat liver transplantation
Yan-Ling Yang, Ke-Feng Dou, Kai-Zong Li
Yan-Ling Yang, Ke-Feng Dou, Kai-Zong
Li, Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery,
Xijing Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an
710032, Shaanxi Province, China
Supported by the
National Nature Science Fundation of China, No. 30070741
Correspondence to:
Kai-Zong Li, Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Xijing Hospital, Fourth
Military Medical University, 710032 Xi'an,
Shaanxi Province, China. gdwk@fmmu.edu.cn
Telephone: +86-29-3375259
Fax: +86-29-3375561
Received:
2002-08-01 Accepted: 2002-08-27
Abstract
AIM: To investigate the influence of
immune tolerance induced by intrauterine exposure to fetal hepatocytes on liver
transplantation in the adult rat.
METHODS:
LOU/CN rat fetal hepatocytes were injected into the fetuses of pregnant CHN rats
(14-16 days of gestation). At 7-9 weeks of age, the surviving male rats received
orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) from male LOU/CN donors and the survival
period was observed and monitered by mixed lymphocyte reaction assay and
cytotoxicity test.
RESULTS:
(1) A total of 31 pregnant CHN rats with 172 fetuses received fetal hepatocytes
from LOU/CN rats via intrauterine injection. Among them, thirteen pregnant rats
showed normal parturition, with 74 neonatal rats growing up normally. (2) The
mean survival period after OLT in rats with fetal exposure to fetal hepatocytes
was 32.1±3.7
days, which was significantly different from the control (11.8±2.3
days, P<0.01) in rats without fetal induction of immune tolerance. (3)
Mixed lymphocyte proliferation assays yielded remarkable discrepancies between
the groups of rats with- or without fetal exposure to fetal hepatocytes, with
values of 8 411±1
361 and 22 473±1
856 (CPM±SD,
P<0.01) respectively. (4) Cytotoxicity assays showed values of 21.2±6.5
% and 64.5±7.2
% (P<0.01) in adult rats with or without fetal induction of immune
tolerance.
CONCLUSION:
Intrauterine injection of fetal hepatocytes into rat fetuses can prolong the
survival period of liver transplant adult male rats recipients, inducting immune
tolerance in OLT.
Yang YL, Dou KF, Li KZ. Influence of
intrauterine injection of rat fetal hepatocytes on rejection of rat liver
transplantation. World J Gastroenterol 2003; 9(1): 137-140
http://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/9/137.htm
INTRODUCTION
In both experimental study and clinical practice,
rejection responses induced by organ transplants necessitate the use of potent
immunosuppressive drugs[1-7]. It should be noted, however, that
excessive dosage of immunosuppressive agents may result in severe side effects
such as hypertension and hepatic and/or renal toxicity. Moreover, prolonged
usage of immunosuppressants often leads to severe infection and increased
susceptibility to malignancy, thus critically affecting the health of
recipients. Particularly in juvenile patients, immunosuppressive drugs can lead
to stunted growth. It is therefore imperative to assess, as an alternative to
immunosuppressants, the protective effect of induced immune tolerance on organ
transplantation. The ideal strategy is to induce a low responsiveness or
irresponsiveness in the recipients toward donors?grafts, while preserving normal
immunological functions for the recognition of tumor antigens and prevention of
infection. Thus immunosuppressive agents can be avoided or be used at
dramatically reduced dosage. The key steps toward successful transplantation
therefore include either attenuated immune reactions or induced immune tolerance
to grafts[8-15].
In utero, the stem
cell transplantation represents a new therapeutic approach of experimental
nature toward the treatment of hematopoietic diseases, immunodeficiency
diseases, metabolic disorders and genetic diseases[16-19]. Some
reports support the possibility of using this method to induce immunologic
tolerance in both human subjects and animals receiving organ transplantation[20-22].
But the effect of in utero fetal exposure to fetal hepatocytes on liver
transplantation in adulthood is unclear. In the present study, we injected fetal
hepatocytes intraperitoneally into rat fetuses and then performed orthotopic
liver transplantation (OLT) in surviving adult male rats. Some parameters were
tested in order to confirm the anti-rejection effect of in utero
injection of fetal hepatocytes.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Animals
Male and female LOU/CN and CHN rats weighing
200-250 g were obtained from the Laboratory Animal Center of The Fourth Military
Medical University, and fed with standard rat chow.
Timed pregnancy of CHN rats
Male CHN rats, or male LOU/CN rats, were
housed individually in standard cages with a metal divider with 0.25-inch holes.
One female CHN or LOU/CN rat was placed in the corresponding empty side. The
cage divider was then removed 48 hrs later. Pairs of CHN or LOU/CN rats were
allowed to mate overnight separately. The pairs were then separated with the
females placed singly in cages. The presence of vaginal plug marked day 0 of
gestation. Normal gestation is about 21 days.
Preparation of LOU/CN fetal rat
hepatocytes
Pregnant LOU/CN females were killed by
cervical dislocation at 15 to 16 days of gestation. All subsequent handling was
done under sterile conditions. The uterine horns were removed and dissected in
phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). Fetuses were separated from decidua and
extraembryonic membranes and transferred to 35 mm petri dishes filled with PBS.
Fetal livers were removed, with 5 to 10 livers placed in 1 to 2 ml RPMI 1640
medium (GIBCO BRL, Grand Island, CA) with 15 % fetal calf serum (FCS, GIBCO BRL,
Grand Island, CA). Cell suspensions were prepared by repeated pipetting of the
livers through a 23-gauge needle attached to a 1ml pipette. The mononuclear
cells were separated by centrifugation at 500 g for 20 minutes and filtered
through a Nitex filter with a 41 祄 pore size (Huamei
chemical company, Henan province, China). Cell viability counting (usually
greater than 90 %) was done using trypan blue exclusion test, and the final cell
suspension was prepared in PBS/15 % FCS at a concentration of 5?07/ml. The cell
suspension was used for intrauterine injection within 4 hours of preparation.
In utero intraperitoneal injection
into CHN rat fetuses with LOU/CN fetal rat hepatocytes
Micropipettes were prepared from capillaries
using a Brown and Flaming micropipette puller. The end of the needle was cut
under a microscope with ophthalmological forceps, and the tip was sharpened on a
micro-grinding wheel. Pregnant (11 to 13 days of gestation) CHN rats were
anesthetized i.p. with sodium pentobarbital, and the uterine horns were
exteriorized with ophthalmological forceps. Fetal hepatocytes from LOU/CN rats
were injected into CHN fetuses through a hand-drawn glass micropipette with a
beveled edge. The placenta was penetrated at an oblique angle. The number of
cells injected per fetus was 106 (about 5×1010 cells/kg of recipient weight), except in
experiments in which the effects of different cell concentrations and volumes of
cell suspension used were examined. Muscle layers were closed with 4-0 silk
suture, and 1-0 silk thread was used for skin suture.
Orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT)
Orthotopic whole-liver transplantation was
performed[23-26] using the simplified cuff technique for portal and
intrahepatic vena cava anastomosis, whereas the hepatic artery was not
reconstructed. The twenty male CHN rats, aged 7 to 9 weeks that survived
intraperitoneal injection with fetal liver cells from LOU/CN rats, were taken as
graft recipients, with normal male LOU/CN rats as liver donors. Both donors and
recipients were anesthetized with methoxyflurane. After explantation, livers
were stored at 0-4 ℃
for 1 hr in UW solution. Grafts were connected to suprahepatic vena cava
with a running 7-0 prolene suture. We insert cuffs into the corresponding
vessels, and anastomose the bile duct and hepatic artery over an intraluminal
polyethylene splint. Transplantation required less than 40 min, while the portal
vein was clamped for 12-15 min during this period. After transplantation, the
recipients had free access to standard laboratory chow and tap water. Animals
that died within 3 days were considered technical failures and were excluded
from data collection. The rate of success of liver transplantation was more than
90 % in this study. Five rats were sacrified at 5 days after OLT. Immediately
before sacrifice, the livers were removed for histological investigation. Liver
samples from 10 normal male CHN rats were taken as controls.
Mixed lymphocyte reaction assay
Mixed spleen cells were used for setting up
lymphocyte cultures. Briefly, the spleens were aseptically removed from
experimental CHN rats that survived in utero intraperitoneal injection of
fetal LOU/CN rat liver cell, and from control CHN rats. Then they were
separately disrupted mechanically using a pair of sterile forceps. LOU/CN spleen
cells were treated with 25 mg/ml
mitocin-C (Kyowa Hakko Kogyo, Tokyo, Japan) at 37 ℃
for 45 min. Then the two groups of cells were washed by PBS, followed by lysis
of erythrocytes in Tris-NH4Cl solution (pH 7.2). After further washes, the cells
were finally resuspended in RPMI 1640 with 10 % FCS. The numbers of two groups
of spleen cells were adjusted, and 5×105 spleen cells from each of the two sources were
mixed together (final volume 0.2 ml) and added to triplicate wells of 96-well
round-bottomed microtiter plates. Cells were cultured for 120 hr, and 1 u Ci
[3H]-thymidine was added into wells 18hr before cell harvesting. Radioactive
thymidine incorporation rate was measured by a liquid scintillation counter
(1205 Betaplate), with data expressed as CPM±SD[27,28]
.
Complement-dependent cytotoxicity test
Recipient CHN rats were tested one week after
OLT for complement-dependent cytotoxicity test against lymphocytes suspensions
from LOU/CN donor rats. Sera from recipients were prepared and added into the
wells of 96-well round-bottomed microtiter plates (1 ml per well). Then 1 ml
lymphocytes (about 2 000 cells per 1 ml volume) were added into the same wells.
They were gently mixed and incubated for 30 min at 22 ℃±
℃,
then 5 ml rabbit complement (Huamei chemical company, Henan province, China) was
added, and the mixture incubated for 60 min at 22 ℃±
℃.
Afterwards, the mixtures were stained with eosin (50 g/L) for 5 min. The cells
were fixed in 36 % formalin for 2 hr and observed with an inverted
phase-contrast microscope (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan). Cytotoxicity was determined
by eosin exclusion and percentage enumeration of cells killed by sera from OLT[29,30].
Histology
Livers from CHN rats that underwent OLT were
fixed in 10 % neutral formalin for five days and then embedded in paraffin. Five
micron sections were cut and stained with hematoxylin and eosin for histological
examination. Sections from normal rat livers served as controls.
Diagnostic criterion of graft
rejection
Several diagnostic criteria were used to
determine the existence of rejection response following hepatic transplantation.
The first is survival of recipients over 7 days post-transplantation. The second
entails the occurrence of acute hepatic dysfunction as typified by inappetence,
weight loss, auricle or nail jaundice, depressed mood, with incidental diarrhea
or ascites in some cases. The third criterion involves typical histological
changes, such as enlarged liver bulk, yellowish white appearance of the liver,
and the presence of liver conglutination to muscles or abdominal walls, and
viscera. Also frequently encountered are apparent degeneration or necrosis of
hepatic cells, and infiltration of numerous lymphocytes, especially at liver
sinusoidal area. The fourth denotes the presence in good condition of the
recipients plus good appetite, accompanied with normal weight 3 days after
successful transplantation. The recipients that died from post-surgical
complications such as necrosis of bile duct, intra-abdominal hemorrhage and
infection were excluded from data collection.
Statistics
All the data were analyzed by Student's
t test and expressed as mean ±S.
The statistical difference P<0.05 was considered significant and P<0.01
as very significant.
RESULTS
Influence of intraperitoneal injection
into fetus in utero on survival of neonatal CHN rats
Thirty-one pregnant CHN recipients who later
delivered 172 fetal CHN rats were injected into their fetuses with isolated
fetal hepatocytes from LOU/CN rats. Among them, eleven pregnant females died
from various surgical complications, and seven females aborted or consumed their
litters. There were 17 pregnant rats with normal parturition, and 74 neonatal
rats grew up normally.
Suppression of rejection
response to rat liver transplantation after intrauterine injection
The mean survival period of rats with fetal
intraperitoneal injection of fetal hepatocytes prior to OLT was 32.1±3.7
day, in comparison to control values of 11.8±2.3
day (P<0.01) obtained from rats without this procedure.
Inhibitory effect of intraperitoneal
injection in utero on mixed lymphocytes reaction assay
Mixed lymphocytes reaction assay showed
significant differences in [3H]-thymidine incorporation rates in groups of CHN
rats that were either fetally exposed (8411±1361,
CPM±SD)
or not (22473±1856,
CPM±SD)
to intraperitoneal injection of fetal hepatocytes in utero (P<0.01).
Suppressive effect of fetal
intraperitoneal injection in utero on cytotoxicity test after rat liver
transplantation in adulthood
Cytotoxicity test revealed percentage values
of dead cells to be 21.2?.5 % vs 64.5?.2 % (P<0.01)
respectively from the two groups of CHN rats with or without fetal
intraperitoneal injection in utero prior to OLT in the adult rats, the
difference being statistically significant.
DISCUSSION
With rapid advances in antenatal diagnostic
technology, many prenatal diseases (congenital metabolic liver disorders,
congenital heart disease and hemophilia, e.g.) can be diagnosed. Therefore organ
transplantation becomes a very useful choice for treating these diseases in
afflicted children. However, routine regime of immunosuppression in use today
suffered from many serious side effects, including stunted growth seen in
children using most immunosuppressive drugs[31-34]. If we can induce
low responsiveness or even irresponsiveness in the recipients to the
donors?grafts, immunosuppressive drugs can then be used at much reduced dosage.
Until now, low responsiveness or irresponsiveness to the graft has not been
achieved in clinical practice. Therefore, induction of immunologic tolerance
becomes imperative in clinical transplantation[35-42].
Clonal deletion
theory maintains that burst of cell proliferation during embryonic period is
very frequent, with resultant formation of multiple specific clones of
lymphocytes capable of responding to respective antigens[43,44].
During embryonic period, the lymphocyte clones encounter internal antigens or
artificially introduced antigens, with consequent damage to, or suppression of
these clones, the so-called abstinence clones. In postnatal life, the abstinence
clone remains inactive to an internal antigen or an artificially introduced
foreign antigen that has been present in utero, a status of immunologic
tolerance in the adult to an antigen following prior exposure during the
embryonic period. On the contrary, if a lymphocyte clone meets an antigen that
has never been introduced during the embryonic period, the specific
immunological response would ensue. According to the theory, intrauterine
injection is considered a useful tool for the induction of immunologic
tolerance, especially for clinical transplantation. Some advantages of
intrauterine injection for evoking immunologic tolerance should be noted.
Firstly, because the host at fetal stage can't recognize
a foreign substance and thus display immunologic tolerance to a xenogen (the
earlier the fetal stage of the host, the stronger the tolerance effect to the
antigen), no immunologic reaction is seen between the host and ecdemic grafts.
Therefore intrauterine injection spares tissue-matching work needed in routine
transplantation and makes easier graft transplantation. Meanwhile, immunologic
tolerance induced by intrauterine injection makes unnecessary pretreatment with
immunosuppressive drugs, thus avoiding possible side effects of
immunosuppressive agents on the body. Secondly, fewer fetal liver cells are
needed for transplanting into the recipients during embryonic period because of
their small body size and weight. The latter assures little influence and gentle
torture for the recipients. Thirdly, in addition to exempt from infection due to
microorganism, the maternal body offers adequate nutrition and energy to the
fetuses, thus the uterus can be seen as an ideal "isolation
room"[45-51].
We also compared
the effect of using rat spleen or bone marrow cells, with that of fetal liver
cells, for intraperitoneal injection in utero into fetuses in pregnant rats. It
was observed that the survival birth rate using fetal liver cells was much
greater than that with spleen or bone marrow cells. Several factors may help to
explain the discrepancy. The most important one may be that the response against
the host is induced by active lymphocytes located in the spleen or bone marrow
cells. In contrast, the main components of fetal liver cells are hematopoietic
stem cells possessing two effects, with the first reducing graft versus host
reaction, and the other for the maintenance of chimerism because hematopoietic
stem cells are characterized by self-renewal and multipotential for
differentiation[52,53].
As evidenced by
both in vivo and in vitro data in the present study, the
method of fetal hepatocytes in utero injection can prolong the survival period
of rat liver transplants. Although complete immune tolerance can not be induced,
partial immune tolerance observed in our study is sufficient for liver
tranplantation. Further work will be needed to reveal if chimerism is induced by
transplantation itself, as well as its possible influence on the immune system
in the grafted recipients.
REFERENCES
1
Karim M, Steger U, Bushell AR, Wood KJ. The role of the graft in
establishing tolerance. Front Biosci 2002; 7: 129-154
2
Riordan SM, Williams R. Transplantation of primary and reversibly
immortalized human liver cells and other gene therapies
in acute liver failure and decompensated chronic
liver disease. World J Gastroenterol 2000; 6: 636-642
3
Tang ZY. Hepatocellular carcinoma-cause, treatment and metastasis. World
J Gastroenterol 2001; 7: 445-454
4
Zhu XF, Chen GH, He XS, Lu MQ, Wang GD, Cai CJ, Yang Y, Huang JF. Liver
transplantation and artificial liver support
in fulminant hepatic failure. World J
Gastroenterol 2001; 7: 566-568
5
Platell CF, Coster J, McCauley RD, Hall JC. The management of patients
with the short bowel syndrome. World J
Gastroenterol 2002; 8: 13-20
6
Ouyang EC, Wu CH, Walton C, Promrat K, Wu GY. Transplantation of human
hepatocytes into tolerized
genetically immunocompetent rats. World J
Gastroenterol 2001; 7: 324-330
7
Waldmann H, Cobbold S. Approaching tolerance in transplantation. Int Arch
Allergy Immunol 2001; 126: 11-22
8
Yu X, Carpenter P, Anasetti C. Advances in transplantation tolerance.
Lancet 2001; 357: 1959-1963
9
Qian YB, Cheng GH, Huang JF. Multivariate regression analysis on early
mortality after orthotopic liver transplantation.
World J Gastroenterol 2002; 8: 128-130
10
Shi LB, Peng SY, Meng XK, Peng CH, Liu YB, Chen XP, Ji ZL, Yang DT, Chen
HR. Diagnosis and treatment of
congenital choledochal cyst: 20 years?experience
in China. World J Gastroenterol 2001; 7: 732-734
11
Bramhall S, Minford E, Gunson B, Buckels JA. Liver transplantation in the
UK. World J Gastroenterol 2001; 7: 602-611
12
Womer KL, Lee RS, Madsen JC, Sayegh MH. Tolerance and chronic rejection.
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B
Biol Sci 2001; 356: 727-738
13
Zavazava N, Kabelitz D. Alloreactivity and apoptosis in graft rejection
and transplantation tolerance.
J Leukoc Biol 2000; 68: 167-174
14
Hong JC, Kahan BD. Immunosuppressive agents in organ transplantation:
past, present, and future.
Semin Nephrol 2000; 20: 108-125
15
Bartlett A, McCall J, Munn S. Co-stimulatory blockade and tolerance
induction in transplantation.
BioDrugs 2001; 15: 491-500
16
Jones DR. In utero stem cell transplantation: two steps forward but one
step back? Expert Opin
Biol Ther 2001; 1: 205-212
17
Hayashi S, Flake AW. In utero hematopoietic stem cell therapy. Yonsei Med
J 2001; 42: 615-629
18
Flake AW. In utero transplantation of haemopoietic stem cells. Best Pract
Res Clin Haematol 2001; 14: 671-683
19
Cowan MJ, Chou SH, Tarantal AF. Tolerance induction post in utero stem
cell transplantation. Ernst Schering Res
Found Workshop 2001; 33: 145-171
20
Kim HB, Shaaban AF, Milner R, Fichter C, Flake AW. In utero bone marrow
transplantation induces donor-specific tolerance
by a combination of clonal deletion and clonal
anergy. J Pediatr Surg 1999; 34: 726-729
21
Rubin JP, Cober SR, Butler PE, Randolph MA, Gazelle GS, Ierino FL, Sachs
DH, Lee WP. Injection of allogeneic bone
marrow cells into the portal vein of swine in
utero. J Surg Res 2001; 95: 188-194
22
Takahashi T, Kakita A, Sakamoto I, Takahashi Y, Hayashi K, Tadokoro F,
Yamashina S. Immunohistochemical and
electron microscopic study of extrinsic hepatic
reinnervation following orthotopic liver transplantation in rats.
Liver 2001; 21: 300-308
23
Boros P, Tarcsafalvi A, Wang L, Megyesi J, Liu J, Miller CM. Intrahepatic
expression and release of vascular endothelial
growth factor following orthotopic liver
transplantation in the rat. Transplantation 2001; 72: 805-811
24
Okano S, Eto M, Tomita Y, Yoshizumi T, Yamada H, Minagawa R, Nomoto K,
Sugimachi K, Nomoto
K. Cyclophosphamide-induced tolerance in rat
orthotopic liver transplantation. Transplantation 2001; 71: 447-456
25
He XS, Huang JF, Chen GH, Zheng KL, Ye XM. A successful case of combined
liver and kidney transplantation for
autosomal dominant polycystic liver and kidney
disease. World J Gastroenterol 1999; 5: 79-80
26
Zhang SG, Wu MC, Tan JW, Chen H, Yang JM, Qian QJ. Expression of perforin
and granzyme B mRNA in judgement
of immunosuppressive effect in rat liver
transplantation. World J Gastroenterol 1999; 5: 217-220
27
Genden EM, Mackinnon SE, Yu S, Hunter DA, Flye MW. Pretreatment with
portal venous ultraviolet B-irradiated
donor alloantigen promotes donor-specific
tolerance to rat nerve allografts. Laryngoscope 2001; 111: 439-447
28
Horimoto H, Nakai Y, Nakahara K, Nomura Y, Mieno S, Sasaki S. HMG-CoA
reductase inhibitor cerivastatin prolonged
rat cardiac allograft survival by blocking
intercellular signals. J Heart Lung Transplant 2002; 21: 440-445
29
Hehmke B, Schroder D, Kloting I, Kohnert KD. Complement-dependent
antibody-mediated cytotoxicity (CAMC) to pancreatic
islet cells in the spontaneously diabetic BB/OK
rat: interference from cell-bound and soluble inhibitors. J Clin Lab
Immunol 1991; 35: 71-81
30
Tange S, Scherer MN, Graeb C, Weiss T, Justl M, Frank E, Andrassy J,
Jauch KW, Geissler EK. The antineoplastic drug
Paclitaxel has immunosuppressive properties that
can effectively promote allograft survival in a rat heart transplant
model. Transplantation 2002; 73: 216-223
31
Reyes J, Mazariegos GV, Bond GM, Green M, Dvorchik I, Kosmach-Park B,
Abu-Elmagd K. Pediatric intestinal
transplantation: Historical notes, principles and
controversies. Pediatr Transplant 2002; 6: 193-207
32
Bassas AF, Chehab MS, Al-Shahed MS, Djurberg HG, Al-Shurafa HA, Jawdat
MT, Al-Hussaini HF, Zuleika MA, Al-Hebby
HA, Wali SH. Pediatric living-related liver
transplantation in Saudi Arabia. Saudi Med J 2002; 23: 640-644
33
Robinson LG, Hilinski J, Graham F, Hymes L, Beck-Sague CM, Hsia J,
Nesheim SR. Predictors of cytomegalovirus
disease among pediatric transplant recipients
within one year of renal transplantation. Pediatr Transplant 2002; 6:
111-118
34
Samsonov D, Briscoe DM. Long-term care of pediatric renal transplant
patients: from bench to bedside. Curr Opin
Pediatr 2002; 14: 205-210
35
Rela M, Dhawan A. Liver transplantation in children. Indian J Pediatr
2002; 69: 175-183
36
Fine RN. Growth following solid-organ transplantation. Pediatr Transplant
2002; 6: 47-52
37
Bucuvalas JC, Ryckman FC. Long-term outcome after liver transplantation
in children. Pediatr Transplant 2002; 6: 30-36
38
Shneider BL. Pediatric liver transplantation in metabolic disease:
clinical decision making. Pediatr
Transplant 2002; 6: 25-29
39
He XS, Huang JF, Chen GH, Fu Q, Zhu XF, Lu MQ, Wang GD, Guan XD.
Orthotopic liver transplantation for fulminant hepatitis
B. World J Gastroenterol 2000; 6: 398-399
40 Guan WX,
Li KZ, Dou KF. Hepatocellular carcinoma and liver transplantation. Shijie Huaren
Xiaohua Zazhi 2001; 9: 1292-1295
41 Song WL,
Wang WZ, Wu GS, Dong GL, Ling R, Ji G, Zhao JX. Evaluation of perioperative
serum cytokine level in acute
rejection in human living-related small bowel
transplantation. Shijie Huaren Xiaohua Zazhi 2001; 9: 401-404
42
He XS, Huang JF, Chen GH, Zheng KL, Ye XM. A successful case of combined
liver and kidney transplantation for
autosomal dominant polycystic liver and kidney
disease. World J Gastroenterol 1999; 5: 79-80
43
Prevot A, Martini S, Guignard JP. Exposure in utero to immunosuppressives.
Rev Med Suisse
Romande 2001; 121: 283-291
44
Tanaka SA, Hiramatsu T, Oshitomi T, Imai Y, Koyanagi H. Induction of
donor-specific tolerance to cardiac xenografts in
utero. J Heart Lung Transplant 1998; 17:
888-891
45
Mackenzie TC, Shaaban AF, Radu A, Flake AW. Engraftment of bone marrow
and fetal liver cells after in utero
transplantation in MDX mice. J Pediatr Surg 2002;
37: 1058-1064
46
Taylor PA, McElmurry RT, Lees CJ, Harrison DE, Blazar BR. Allogenic fetal
liver cells have a distinct competitive
engraftment advantage over adult bone marrow
cells when infused into fetal as compared with adult severe
combined immunodeficient recipients. Blood 2002; 99:
1870-1872
47
Barker JE, Deveau S, Lessard M, Hamblen N, Vogler C, Levy B. In utero
fetal liver cell transplantation without toxic
irradiation alleviates lysosomal storage in mice
with mucopolysaccharidosis type VII. Blood Cells Mol Dis 2001; 27:
861-873
48
Casal ML, Wolfe JH. In utero transplantation of fetal liver cells in the
mucopolysaccharidosis type VII mouse results in
low-level chimerism, but overexpression of beta-glucuronidase
can delay onset of clinical signs. Blood 2001; 97: 1625-1634
49
Surbek DV, Holzgreve W, Nicolaides KH. Haematopoietic stem cell
transplantation and gene therapy in the fetus: ready
for clinical use? Hum Reprod Update 2001; 7:
85-91
50
Surbek DV, Gratwohl A, Holzgreve W. In utero hematopoietic stem cell
transfer: current status and future strategies.
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 1999; 85:
109-115
51
Flake AW, Zanjani ED. In utero transplantation for thalassemia. Ann N Y
Acad Sci 1998; 850: 300-311
52
Pschera H. Stem cell therapy in utero. J Perinat Med 2000; 28:
346-354
53
Stanworth SJ, Newland AC. Stem cells: progress in research and edging
towards the clinical setting.
Clin Med 2001; 1: 378-382
Edited by Wu XN