|
Xin-Xin
Zhang, Jing Liu, Yuan Wang, State Key Laboratory of Molecular Biology,
Institute of Biochemistry and Cell Biology, Shanghai Institutes for
Biological Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, 200031, China
Xin-Xin
Zhang, Shen-Ying Zhang, Zhi-Meng Lu, Department of Infectious Diseases,
Rui Jin Hospital, Shanghai Second Medical University, Shanghai, 200025,
China
Correspondence
to: Dr. Yuan Wang, Institute of Biochemistry and Cell Biology, 320 Yue
Yang Road, Shanghai, 200031, China. wangyuan@server.shcnc.ac.cn
Telephone:
+86-21-54921103 Fax:
+86-21-64675170
Received:
2002-12-22 Accepted:
2003-01-16
Abstract
AIM:
To explore the properties of hypervariable region 1 (HVR1) in the envelope
2 gene of hepatitis C virus by analyzing the reactivity of HVR1 fusion
proteins from different Chinese HCV strains with sera of patients with
chronic hepatitis C and by comparing their reactivity between interferon
therapy responders and non-responders.
METHODS:
Gene fragments of HVR1 of four HCV strains (three genotype 1b and one
genotype 2a) were amplified from pGEMT-E2 plasmids and sub-cloned into
pQE40 vectors respectively to construct recombinant expression plasmids
which expressed HVR1 fused downstream to DHFR in Escherichia coli strain
TG1. The purified DHFR- HVR1 proteins were then used to detect the
anti-HVR1 antibodies in 70 serum samples of patients with chronic
hepatitis C.
RESULTS:
Four DHFR- HVR1 fusion proteins were successfully expressed in E.coli
(320-800 ug fusion proteins per 100 ml culture). Each fusion protein
(SH1b, BJ1b, SD1b and SD2a) reacted with 72.8 % (51/70), 60 % (42/70),
48.6 % (34/70), and 58.6 % (41/70) of the anti-HCV positive patients sera
respectively by ELISA. 57.1 % (4/7) of non responders reacted with all
four HVR1 fusion proteins, while only 15.3 % (2/13) of responders reacted
with all of them. The O.D. values of sera from IFN therapy responders were
significantly higher than those of non responders (P<0.05).
CONCLUSION:
The selected HVR1 fusion proteins expressed in E. coli can broadly react
with HCV-infected patients sera. The intensity and/or quality of the
immune response against HCV may be a critical factor determining the
response to interferon treatment. With the evolution of virus strains,
anti-HVR1 antibodies can not neutralize all the quasispecies. A polyvalent
and high immunogenic vaccine comprising a mixture of several HVR1
sequences that cover the reactivity of most HCV isolates may be useful.
Zhang
XX, Zhang SY, Liu J, Lu ZM, Wang Y. Expression of hepatitis C virus
hypervariable region 1 and its clinical significance. World J
Gastroenterol 2003; 9(5):
1003-1007
http://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/9/1003.asp
INTRODUCTION
Hepatitis
C virus (HCV) is the major etiologic agent of blood transfusion-associated
and sporadic non-A non-B hepatitis worldwide. About 70 % of the infections
become chronic, among which a significant proportion eventually develops
cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. Despite recent success after the
combination therapy with Interferon-a and
ribavirin[1-3], about 60 % of
patients still fail to respond. Thus, the development of HCV vaccine is
especially important, but it remains an urgent challenge due to the high
mutation rate of HCV.
Multiple lines of evidence indicate that one
of the principal neutralization determinants corresponds to the
hypervariable region 1 (HVR1), which is located in the amino-terminus of
E2 of HCV (nt1150-1230). Zibert et al[4] found that an early appearance of
antibodies directed to HVR1 is associated with acute self-limiting
infection of HCV, while the persistence of HVR1 antibodies is associated
with chronic HCV infection. Antibodies against HVR1 have been shown to
block adsorption to susceptible cells in vitro[5,6]. Animal antibodies
raised against this region have provided effective prophylaxis in
chimpanzee challenge experiments[7-9], but attempts to develop a HVR1
vaccine against HCV were hampered by the frequent mutations of HVR1.
Although anti-HVR1 antibodies react with HVR1 proteins specifically, a
single fraction of antibodies has potentiality to react with more than one
HVR1 protein sharing a similar amino acid sequence[10]. Theses findings
suggest that HVR1 may play an important role in the prevention of HCV
infection.
Our previous study[11] analyzed the
variability of HCV envelope region in 12 dominant strains from different
cities of China and predicted the immunogenicity with computer programs,
demonstrating that genotypes and epidemic areas should be considered when
identifying the cross-reactive epitopes for vaccine design. In this study,
we selected four HCV strains of two genotypes from three regions
(Shanghai, Beijing and Shandong) of China according to the results of the
variant analysis and immunogenicity prediction of the envelope region in
Chinese HCV strains. The gene fragments of HVR1 were amplified from four
corresponding pGEMT-E2 plasmids and sub-cloned into pQE 40 vectors
respectively to construct four recombinant prokaryotic expression plasmids
that can express HVR1 as fusion proteins with DHFR. The purified DHFR-
HVR1 proteins were then used to detect the anti-HVR1 antibodies in sera of
patients with chronic hepatitis C to further explore their antigenicity
and analyze the different reactivity between IFN therapy responders and
non-responders.
MATERIALS
AND METHODS
Patients
Fifty
HCV-infected patients were studied, who were all anti-HCV positive by
commercial anti-HCV assays (third generation of enzyme-linked
immunosorbent assay [ELISA], Abbott, North Chicago, IL). Of these, 20
patients received interferon (IFN) therapy, Roferon (Roche, Switherland),
3 million units three times a week for 6 months. 13 patients who showed
negativity of serum HCV RNA and normalization of alanine aminotransferase
(ALT) level after cessation of IFN were considered as responders, while
the other 7 patients who remained HCV RNA positive and/or presented
fluctuation of ALT were designed non responders (Table 1). Quantitation of
serum HCV RNA was performed using commercial kit from Fu Hua Gene Company,
Shanghai. Informed consent was obtained from all the patients, and study
protocol was approved by the committee on human ethics. 20 healthy blood
donors who were anti-HCV negative were also analyzed as negative control.
Table
1 Characteristics of chronic
hepatitis C patients treated with IFN-a
|
Responders |
Non
responders |
| Number
|
13
|
7 |
| Age
(Yr)
|
41
|
40
|
| Sex
(F/M)
|
5/8
|
2/5
|
| Known
duration of infection (Yr)
|
10.6
|
9.9
|
| Baseline
ALT (IU/ml)
|
185
|
126 (P=0.1660)
|
| Baseline
viral load (copies/ml)
|
4.37×106
|
2.92106 (P=0.6908)
|
Methods
Construction
of recombinant expression plasmids Part
of E2/NS1 regions was cloned from sera of the patients and sequenced as
described before[11]. From these plasmids pGEMT-E2, DNA fragments
containing HVR1 (nt1150-1233,
aa384-411) were amplified by PCR. The primers for HCV strain Shanghai 1b
(SH1b), sense: nt1150-1161, 5'TAGATCTGCAACCTACACG3', anti-sense:
nt1225-1233, 5'CCAAGCTTAGATTTTCTG3'; the primers for strain Beijing 1b
(BJ1b), sense: nt1150-1161, 5'TAGATCTGGCACCTATACG3', anti-sense: same as
SH1b; the primers for strain Shandong 1b (SD1b), sense: nt1150-1159, 5'TAGATCTGAGACCCGTG3',
anti-sense: same as SH1b, and the primers for Shandong 2a (SD2a), sense:
nt1150-1159, 5'TAGATCTAGCACCCACG
3', anti-sense: nt1225-1233, 5'CCAAGCTTAGATGTTCTG3'.
The PCR products were purified and ligated into the Hind III, Bgl II sites
of the expression vector pQE40 which allows fusion of HVR1 encoding
sequences downstream to the murine dihydrofolate reductase (DHFR) with a
N-terminal 6×His tag.
The recombinant plasmids were identified by
digestion with Hind III and Bgl II. The inserts were then sequenced to
ensure that the DNA encoded the authentic HCV sequence. The identified
plasmids were named as pQE40-HVR1-SH1b, BJ1b, SD1b and SD2a respectively.
Expression
and purification of the fusion proteins
The recombinant plasmids and pQE40 vector were transformed to
E.coli strain TG1.DHFR-HVR1 fusion proteins were expressed by induction
with 1 mmol/l isopropyl-b-D-thiogalactotyranoside (IPTG) in 100 ml of LB/ampicillin
media cultured at 37 ℃ with vigorous shaking. After 6 h of induction,
cells were harvested by centrifugation at 4 ℃ and 5 000 g for 30 min.
Harvested cells were re-suspended in 10 ml of
8M urea/20mM b-ME/PBS pH8.0, and cell disruption was performed using an
ultrasound sonication method. After centrifugation at 20 000 g and 4 ℃ for 30 min, the supernatant was saved for purification on
Ni2+-nitrilotriacetate (NTA)-agarose (Qiagen) according to manufacture's
instructions at room temperatures. Denatured crude extract was allowed to
bind to Ni2+-NTA- agarose pre-equilibrated in 8M urea/20mM b-ME/PBS pH8.0
for 2 h. The gel matrice were then washed with the same solution pH6.3 and
gel-bound proteins were eluted with that of pH4.3.
The purified fusion proteins were run on 12 %
sodium dodecyl sulfate -polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) for
identification. For protein visualization and quantification, gels were
stained with Coomassie brilliant blue (Sigma). The purity and yield of
recombinant proteins were calculated from densitometric scanning results
by comparing with known quantity of BSA (Bio-Rad) run on the same gel.
ELISA
The plates were coated with four purified fusion proteins
respectively or combined at of 0.2 mg/well for 1 hour at 37 ℃ and then
overnight at 4 ℃ in carbonate buffer pH 9.5. After blocking with 1 % BSA
for 1 hour at 37 ℃, sera were dispended in wells at a dilution of 1:20
and incubated for 45 min at 37 ℃, followed by washing. HRP conjugated
goat anti-human IgG (Sino-American Biological Company) diluted 1:8 000 was
then added and plates were incubated for 45 min at 37 ℃. After washing,
the color was developed using TMB according to standard procedures, and
the optical density values were measured at 450nm (OD450) in automatic
photometer (Wellscan K3, Labsystem Company).
Statistical
analysis
The
results were analyzed by the t test. In all analyses, a P value less than
0.05 was considered statistically significant.
RESULTS
Construction
of the recombinant plasmids
Four
recombinant plasmids expressing HVR1 fused with DHFR were constructed as
described in methods. Obtained clones were digested with Hind III and Bgl
II, 95bp fragments of HVR1 coding sequences could be detected from each of
them (Figure 1). Automatic sequencing confirmed that the inserted HVR1
fragments corresponded to reported data (Figure 2). The reading frames of
the recombinant plasmids were correct.
Figure
1(PDF) Digestion of the
recombinant plasmids with HindIII and Bgl II. M is DNA marker (DL 2000).
Lane 1-lane 4 show four recombinant plasmid digestion results, SH1b, BJ1b,
SD1b and SD2a respectively. Lane 5 is the control (pQE40).
Figure
2A(PDF) The nucleotide sequences
of the four HVR1 fragments in recombinant pQE40-HVR1 palsmids. Dashes
represent nucleotides identical to those of HVR1-SH1b.
Figure
2B(PDF)
Deduced amino acid
sequence of the HVR1 fragments in pQE40-HVR1. Sequences are shown with a
single-letter amino acid code where residue is different from the
consensus sequence of genotype 1b defined by Hattori et al, and with a
dash where residue is identical.
Expression
and purification of the fusion proteins
The
proteins expressed in transformed E. coli were analyzed by SDS-PAGE. The
fusion proteins migrated as an approximately 28 kDa band, approximately 3
kDa larger than DHFR (Figure 3A), in accordance with the fusion of 28 aa
HVR1. Figure 3B shows the SDS-PAGE result of four purified fusion proteins
and DHFR. The concentrations estimated by BSA grades are 0.4-1.0 mg/ml, so
about 320-800 mg of purified protein can be obtained from every 100 ml of
bacteria culture.
Figure
3A(PDF) SDS-PAGE of the fusion
proteins expressed in E.coli strain TG1. M: protein molecular marker. Lane
1 is vector pQE40 before induction, Lane 2 is one of the recombinant
plasmids before induction. Lane 3~7, are recombinant plasmids pQE40-SH1b,
BJ1b, SD1b, and SD2a after 4 hours of induction with 1 mmol/l IPTG
respectively.
Figure
3B(PDF)
Results of the purified
proteins. M is protein marker. Lane 1 is plain DHFR. Lane 2-5 are the
fusion proteins SH1b, BJ1b, SD1b and SD2a serially.
Detection
of anti-HVR1 Ab in HCV infected patients'sera
Anti-HVR1
antibodies were detected in 70 serum samples from 50 patients with chronic
hepatitis C (sera were tested before and after IFN therapy for 20
patients) using the four DHFR-HVR1 fusion proteins respectively. None of
the healthy blood donors, who were anti-HCV negative, was anti-HVR1
positive. Anti-HCV seronegative healthy donors had mean OD450 value of
0.06. Sera were scored positive showing OD value >0.2 (cut off = 3 time
mean neg + 10 %) in at least two experiments. Each fusion protein (SH1b,
BJ1b, SD1b and SD2a) reacted with 72.8 % (51/70), 60 % (42/70), 48.6 %
(34/70), and 58.6 % (41/70) of the anti-HCV positive patients
respectively. SH1b was the most broadly reactive fusion protein. 91.4 %
(64/70) of the tested sera reacted positively with one or more fusion
proteins, and among these, 89.1 % (57/64) can react with more than one
fusion proteins, 20.3 % (13/64) samples of these sera were shown to react
with all four fusion proteins.
The reactivity of sera was compared between
responders and non-responders in 20 patients who received interferon
therapy (Table 2). The reactive rates of sera with the four fusion
proteins were higher in non-responders than in responders before
interferon therapy, but there was no statistical significance. 57.1 %
(4/7) of non-responders reacted with all four DHFR-HVR1 fusion proteins,
while only 15.3 % (2/13) of responders react with all of them (Figure 4).
With the three fusion proteins (SH1b, BJ1b and SD2a), the ODs of the serum
reactivity of the non-responders were higher than those of responders, and
the difference had statistical significances for the four mixed proteins
between the two groups of patients (P<0.05) (Figure 5).
Figure
4(PDF)
The serum of hepatitis C
patients reacted with different numbers of HVR1 fusion proteins. A shows
that the sera of IFN responders reacted with 0-4 kinds of HVR1sequence; B
shows that the sera of IFN non-responders reacted with 1-4 kinds of
HVR1sequnce.
Figure
5(PDF)
The OD values of 40 HCV-infected
patients sera reacted with the four HVR1 fusion proteins respectively or
totally, which were compared between R (IFN-responders) and NR (IFN-non
responders). For the mixed fusion proteins, the values (OD/CUT OFF) of the
responders sera were significantly higher than those of non-responders
(P=0.0358).
Table
2 The serum reactive rates of
chronic hepatitis C patients
with
the four HVR1 fusion proteins before IFN therapy
| Proteins
|
Responders(13)
|
Non responders(7)
|
Total(20)
|
| SH1b
|
69.2 %(9/13)
|
85.7 %(6/7)
|
75
%(15/20)
|
| BJ1b
|
53.8 %(7/13)
|
57.1 %(4/7)
|
55
%(11/20)
|
| SD1b
|
30.8 %(4/13)
|
71.4 %(5/7)
|
45
%(9/20)
|
| SD2a
|
69.2 %(9/13)
|
71.4 %(5/7)
|
70
%(14/20)
|
| MIX
|
69.2 %(9/13)
|
71.4 %(5/7)
|
70
%(14/20)
|
DISCUSSION
Antibodies
against HVR1 of the main envelope protein of HCV are hypothesized to be
neutralizing, but frequent mutation in HVR1 is driven by the host's
humoral immune response[12] and is a major mechanism of viral persistence
by escaping host immune recognition[13,14]. The relationship between the
severity of liver diseases and the molecular evolution of HCV during
chronic infection remains unclear and controversial[15]. HVR1 has the
potential to provide a viral antigen for vaccine development, and the
cross-reactivity of HVR1 sequences is an essential consideration in the
development of a broadly protective vaccine to prevent HCV infection.
Cerino et al[16] reported that the appearance of anti-HVR1 is earlier than
anti-E2, and the early appearance of anti-HVR1 antibodies may be
predictive of the later clearance of HCV. It has also been found that HVR1
sequences could induce anti-HVR1 antibodies capable of reacting with many
HVR1 sequences in vitro other than the original immunogen sequence[17]. It
might be the conserved sub-regions in HVR1 sequences that determined the
observed immunological cross-reactivity, by which it may eventually be
possible to develop a polyvalent vaccine using a mixture of several HVR1
sequences that cover the reactivity of most HCV isolates.
Synthetic HVR1 peptides have been used in
many studies, but this method is too expensive to be used widely. Hattori
et al[10] successfully expressed HVR1 (aa383-410) as fusion proteins with
GST (about 32kDa) in E.coli DH5a, and each fusion protein reacted with
36.1 % to 59.3 % of HCV infected patients sera. Others reported different
reactivity of chronic hepatitis C patients sera with HVR1 proteins from 15
% to 67 %[18,19]. In this study, we selected four HCV strains of two
genotypes from our previous reported clones (SH1b, BJ1b, SD1b and SD2a),
because the HVR1 fragments in these four strains was predicted to have
higher hydrophilicity and possess 2-3 immunogenic epitopes in each of them[11]. We used pQE40 vector to express HVR1 fused with DHFR in E.coli.
pQE40 is constructed for expression of N-terminally 6×His-tagged DHFR-fusion
proteins and is recommended for expression of poorly expressed proteins or
short peptides. DHFR could enhance both stability and antigenicity of the
fusion protein, while DHFR itself displays little immunogenicity[20].
The reactivity of the fusion proteins with
HCV-infected patients sera, especially SH1b was higher than most reports.
We selected the HVR1 sequences according to computer prediction. The
reason that the selected HVR1 sequence reacted with a considerable
proportion of HCV-infected patients sera may be that cross-reactive
antibodies react with the different HVR1 proteins through common epitopes,
as suggested by Scarselli et al[21]. It might also be the consequence of
exposure to multiple strains of HCV.
HCV genotype and the baseline level of
viremia have been pointed out as the most important predictive factors of
responsiveness to IFN therapy[22]. However, several studies suggested that
other factors, such as the heterogeneity of virus population[23] and
replication in PBMC[24], might also influence the effectiveness of
therapy. Like most RNA viruses, HCV circulates in the human host as a
complex population of different but closely related viral variants,
commonly referred to as quasispecies[25]. It has been suggested that a
reduction in genetic diversity leading to an increasingly homogeneous
viral population in the envelope genes, and especially in the HVR1 of the
E2 gene, is likely to be the result of a more successful and balanced
cellular and humoral immune response[26], which can be observed in IFN
therapy responders with viral clearance[27,28]. It was also reported that
the broad reactivity of serum anti-HVR1 antibodies correlated with viral
loads and response to IFN in genotype-1b-infected patients[10]. But Del
porto et al[29] found that the frequency of anti-HVR1 T cell response was
significantly higher in patients who recovered after IFN therapy than that
in those who did not, while no difference in the anti-HVR1 antibody
reactivities were detected. In
our study, the reactive rates of the four HVR1 fusion proteins with
patients sera were higher in non-responders than those in responders,
although there was no statistical difference, which might be due to
insufficient number of patients. Meanwhile, 57.1 % (4/7) of non responders
reacted with all four HVR1 fusion proteins, while only 15.3 % (2/13) of
responders reacted with all of them. These facts suggested that the
genetic diversity of HCV was greater in non responders than that in
responders. The broad cross-reactivity of anti-HVR1 anti-bodies causes the
inefficiency of neutralizing activity as proposed by the theory of
"viral
antigenic sin"[21,30]. According to this theory, after the exposure to
the first immunodominant and cross-reactive virus strain, patients produce
not a new antibody to the second related virus strain, but an antibody to
the original antigen, which is inefficient to neutralize the new variant.
The findings that the serum reactive rates with the four HVR1 fusion
proteins were higher in non responders than in responders may be
interpreted by this theory. On the other hand, the O.D. values of
anti-HVR1 antibodies were higher in responders than those in non
responders. This reflected the immune status of these patients and implied
that the pre-therapy immune response is a major factor determining
eventual virus elimination as suggested by others[31,32].
In conclusion, the selected HVR1 fusion
proteins expressed in E. coli can broadly react with HCV-infected patients
sera. The intensity and/or quality of the immune response against HCV
could be a critical factor determining the response to treatment. With the
evolution of virus strains, anti-HVR1 antibodies could not neutralize all
the quasispecies. A polyvalent and high immungenic vaccine combining a
mixture of several HVR1 sequences that cover the reactivity of most HCV
isolates might be useful.
REFERENCES
1
Poynard T, Marcellin P, Lee SS, Niederau C, Minuk GS, Ideo G, Bain
V, Heathcote J, Zeuzem S, Trepo C, Albrecht J.
Randomized trial of
interferon alpha 2b plus ribavirine for 48 weeks or for 24 weeks versus
interferon alpha 2b plus
placebo for 48 weeks for treatment of chronic
infection with hepatitis C virus. International Hepatitis Interventional
Therapy Group (IHIT). Lancet 1998; 352: 1426-1432
2
Wietzkebetaraun P, Meier V, Braun F, Ramadori G. Combination of "low-dose
ribavirin and interferon alfa-2a therapy
followed by interferon alfa-2a
monotherapy in chronic HCV-infected non-responders and relapsers after
interferon
alfa-2a monotherapy. World J Gastroenterol 2001; 7: 222-227
3
Arase Y, Ikeda K, Tsubota A, Suzuki Y, Saitoh S, Kobayashi M,
Kobayashi M, Suzuki F, Akuta N, Someya T, Kumada H.
Efficacy of prolonged
interferon therapy for patients with chronic hepatitis C with HCV-genotype
1b and high virus load.
J Gastroenterol 2003; 38: 158-163
4
Zibert A, Meisel H, Kraas W, Schulz A, Jung G, Roggendorf M. Early
antibody response against hypervariable region
1 is associated with acute
self-limiting infections of hepatitis C virus. Hepatology 1997; 25:
1245-1249
5
Shimizu YK, Igarashi H, Kiyohara T, Cabezon T, Farci P, Purcell RH.
A hyperimmune serum against a synthetic
peptide corresponding to the
hypervariable region 1 of hepatitis C virus can prevent viral infection in
cell cultures.
Virology 1996; 223: 409-412
6
Zhou YH, Takekoshi M, Maeda F, Ihara S, Esumi M. Recombinant
antibody Fab against the hypervariable region 1 of
hepatitis C virus
blocks the virus adsorption to susceptible cells in vitro. Antiviral Res
2002; 56: 51-59
7
Choo QL, Kuo G, Ralston R, Weiner A, Chien D, Nest GV, Han J,
Berger K, Thudium K, Kuo C, Kansopon J, Mcfarlad J,
Tabrizi A, Ching K,
Moos B, Cummins LB, Houghton M, Muchmore E. Vaccination of chimpanzees
against infection by
the hepatitis C virus. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1994;
91: 1294-1298
8
Esumi M, Rikihisa T, Nishimura S, Goto J, Mizuno K, Zhou YH,
Shikata T. Experimental vaccine activities of recombinant E1
and E2
glycoproteins and hypervariable region 1 peptides of hepatitis C virus in
chimpanzees. Arch Virol
1999; 144: 973-980
9
Goto J, Nishimura S, Esumi M, Makizumi K, Rikihisa T, Nishihara T,
Mizuno K, Zhou Y, Shikata T, Fujiyama S, Tomita K.
Prevention of hepatitis
C virus infection in a chimpanzee by vaccination and epitope mapping of
antiserum directed
against hypervariable region 1. Hepatol Res 2001; 19:
270-283
10
Hattori M, Yoshioka K, Aiyama T, Iwata K, Terazawa Y, Ishigami M,
Yano M, Kakumu S. Broadly reactive antibodies
to hypervariable region 1 in
hepatitis C virus-infected patient sera: relation to viral loads and
response to interferon.
Hepatology 1998; 27: 1703-1710
11
Cai Q, Zhang XX, Tian LF, Yuan M, Jin GD, Lu ZM. Variant analysis
and immunogenicity prediction of envelope gene of
HCV strains from China.
J Med Virol 2002; 67: 490-500
12
Gaud U, Langer B, Petropoulou T, Thomas HC, Karayiannis P. Changes
in hypervariable region 1 of the envelope 2
glycoprotein of hepatitis C
virus in children and adults with humoral immune defects. J Med Virol
2003; 69: 350-356
13
Weiner AJ, Geysen HM, Christopherson C, Hall JE, Mason TJ, Saracco
G, Bonino F, Crawford K, Marion CD, Crawford KA,
Brunetto M, Barr PJ,
Miyamura T, McHutchinson J, Houghton M. Evidence for immune selection of
hepatitis C virus (HCV)
putative envelope glycoprotein variants: potential
role in chronic HCV infection. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA
1992; 89: 3468-3472
14
Mondelli MU, Cerino A, Lisa A, Brambilla S, Segagni L, Cividini A,
Bissolati M, Missale G, Bellati G, Meola A, Bruniercole B, N
icosia A,
Galfre G, Silini E. Antibody responses to hepatitis C virus hypervariable
region 1: evidence for cross-reactivity
and immune-mediated sequence
variation. Hepatology 1999; 30: 537-545
15
Curran R, Jameson CL, Craggs JK, Grabowska AM, Thomson BJ, Robins
A, Irving WL, Ball JK. Evolutionary trends of the
first hypervariable
region of the hepatitis C virus E2 protein in individuals with differing
liver disease severity. J Gen Virol
2002; 83: 11-23
16
Cerino A, Bissolati M, Cividini A, Nicosia A, Esumi M, Hayashi N,
Mizuno K, Slobbe R, Oudshoorn P, Silini E, Asti M,
Mondelli MU. Antibody
responses to the hepatitis C virus E2 protein: relationship to viremia and
prevalence in
Anti-HCV seronegative subjects. J Med Virol 1997; 51: 1-5
17
Zhou YH, Moriyama M, Esumi M. Multiple sequence-reactive antibodies
induced by a single peptide immunization
with hypervariable region 1 of
hepatitis C virus. Virology 1999; 256: 360-370
18
Zibert A, Schreier E, Roggendorf M. Antibodies in human sera
specific to hypervariable region 1 of hepatitis C virus can
block viral
attachment. Virology 1995; 208: 653-661
19
Lechner S, Rispeter K, Meisel H, Kraas W, Jung G, Roggendorf M,
Zibert A. Antibodies directed to envelope proteins of
hepatitis C virus
outside of hypervariable region 1. Virology 1998; 243: 313-321
20
Gu J, Stephenson CG, Iadarola MJ. Recombinant proteins attached to
a nicked-NTA column: use in affinity purification
of antibodies.
BioTechniques 1994; 17: 257
21
Scarselli E, Cerino A, Esposito G, Silini E, Mondelli MU, Traboni
C. Occurrence of antibodies reactive with more than one
variant of the
putative envelope glycoprotein (gp70) hypervariable region 1 in viremic
hepatitis C virus-infected patients.
J Virol 1995; 69: 4407-4412
22
Davis GL, Lau JY. Factors predictive of a beneficial response to
therapy of hepatitis C. Hepatology
1997; 26(Suppl 3): 122S-127S
23
Sandres K, Dubois M, Pasquier C, Payen JL, Alric L, Duffaut M,
Vinel JP, Pascal JP, Puel J, Izopet J. Genetic heterogeneity
of
hypervariable region 1 of the hepatitis C virus (HCV) genome and
sensitivity of HCV to alpha interferon therapy. J Virol
2000; 74: 661-668
24
Gong GZ, Lai LY, Jiang YF, He Y, Su XS. HCV replication in PBMC and
its influence on interferon therapy. World J
Gastroenterol 2003; 9:
291-294
25
Martell M, Esteban JL, Quer J, Genesca J, Weiner A, Esteban R,
Guardia J, Gomez J. Hepatitis C virus (HCV) circulates
as a population of
different but closely related genomes: quasispecies nature of HCV genome
distribution. J Virol
1992; 66: 3225-3229
26
Klenerman P, Lechner F, Kantzanou M, Ciurea A, Hengartner H,
Zinkernagel R. Viral escape and the failure of cellular
immune responses.
Science 2000; 289: 2003
27
Farci P, Strazzera R, Alter HJ, Farci S, Degioannis D, Coiana A,
Peddis G, Usai F, Serra G, Chessa L, Diaz G, Balestrieri A,
Purcell RH.
Early changes in hepatitis C viral quasispecies during interferon therapy
predict the therapeutic outcome.
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2002; 99:
3081-3086
28
Grahovac B, Bingulac-Popovic J, Vucelic B, Hrstic I, Ostojic R,
Drazic V, Balija M, Grgicevic D. Hypervariable region 1 of
hepatitis C
virus genome and response to interferon therapy. Clin Chem Lab Med 2000;
38: 905-910
29
Del Porto P, Puntoriero G, Scotta C, Nicosis A, Piccolella E. High
prevalence of hypervariable region 1-specific and cross-
reactive CD4+ T
cells in HCV-infected individuals responsive to IFN-a
treatment. Virology
2000; 269: 313-324
30
Dimmock NJ. Neutralization of animal viruses. Curr Top Microbiol
Immunol 1993; 183: 1-149
31
Hadlock KG, Gish R, Rowe J, Rajyaguru SS, Newsom M, Warford A,
Foung SK. Cross-reactivity and clinical impact of the
antibody response to
hepatitis C virus second envelope glycoprotein (E2). J Med Virol 2001; 65:
23-29
32
Boulestin A, Sandres-Saun K, Payen JL, Alric L, Dubois M, Pasquier
C, Vinel JP, Pascal JP, Puel J, Izopet J. Genetic
heterogeneity of the
envelope 2 gene and eradication of hepatitis C virus after a second course
of interferon-a.
J Med Virol, 2002; 68: 221-228
Edited
by Zhang JZ
| |