P.O.Box 2345, Beijing 100023,China World J Gastroenterol  2002 October 15;8(5):956-960
Email: wcjd@public.bta.net.cn WJG  ISSN 1007-9327  CN 14-1219/ R
http:// www.wjgnet.com Copyright © 2002 by The WJG Press

Combined small bowel and reduced auxiliary liver transplantation: case report

Wei-Jie Zhang, Dun-Gui Liu, Qi-Fa Ye, Bo Sha, Fan-Jun Zhen, Hui Guo, Sui-Sheng XiaFull Article PDF


Wei-Jie Zhang, Dun-Gui Liu, Qi-Fa Ye, Bo Sha, Fan-Jun Zhen, Hui Guo, Sui-Sheng Xia, Institute of Organ Transplantation, Tongji Hospital, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430030, Hubei Province, China
Correspondence to: Dr. Wei-Jie Zhang, Institute of Organ Transplantation, Tongji Hospital, 1095 Jie Fang Da Dao, Wuhan 430030, China. wjzhang@public.wh.hb.cn
Telephone: +86-27-83662655 Fax: +86-27-83662892
Received 2001-05-31 Accepted 2001-09-22


Abstract
AIM:
To present a case of combined small bowel and reduced auxiliary liver transplantation.

METHODS:
A 55-year-old patient with short bowel syndrome and TPN-related liver dysfunction received small bowel transplantation combined with a reduced auxiliary liver graft. A liver was added to restore the patient's liver function and to protect the intestinal allograft from rejection. His own liver was not removed.

RESULTS:
Without donor pretreatment and by conventional immunosuppresive therapy following transplantation, the patient experienced had only one episode of mild intestinal rejection, which was easily reversed by treatment with Methylprednisolone. No liver rejection occurred. Unfortunately, the patient died of heart and lung failure 30d after transplantation, despite successful graft replacement. Histopathologic examination of specimens after death demonstrated normal structure in both intestinal and liver grafts.

CONCLUSION:
The auxiliary liver graft might play a role in preventing intestinal allograft rejection. However, the observation period in this case is short. Further study is needed to determine the risks, effect on the protecting the small-bowel from rejection, and feasibility of general application of this procedure.

Zhang WJ, Liu DG, Ye QF, Sha B, Zhen FJ, Guo H, Xia SS. Combined small bowel and reduced auxiliary liver transplantation: case report. World J Gastroenterol 2002; 8(5):956-960



INTRODUCTION
Small bowel transplantation is a possible choice of treatment for patients with irreversible failure of the intestine[1-8]. Compared with the success in other solid organ allografts, attempts at small bowel transplantation in human have got poor results in terms of patient and graft survival[9-17]. Rejection, immunosuppression-related infections and graft-versus-host reaction (GVHR) are the main obstacles to clinical application[18-30].
      In 1990, Grant et al[31] first reported a case of successful small-bowel transplantation combined with a liver graft. This patient had only one episode of mild intestinal rejection, which was easily reversed by treatment with OKT3. She had maintained normal nutrition for more than 2 years after surgery. The authors considered that the lack of serious intestinal rejection in this case may be due to immunological protection provided by the liver graft. Subsequently, some investigators demonstrated the same observations[32-38], others reported that combined liver-bowel transplantation has no immunologic advantage over bowel transplantation alone[39-41]. Furthermore, it has been shown that auxiliary liver transplantation had a slight protective effect on simultaneously transplanted small bowel, and it was not as strong as has been observed with orthotopic liver transplantation[42].
      We report a case of short-bowel syndrome and secondary TPN-related hepatic dysfunction who received small-bowel transplantation combined with a reduced auxiliary liver graft in our institute. After operation, only one episode of mild intestinal rejection occurred without liver rejection.

CASE REPORT
Case history
A 55 year old patient has had the short-bowel syndrome since February 1999 after the resection of whole small bowel and right colon because of thrombosis of the superior mesenteric artery. He was then alive on total parenteral nutrition (TPN), but was not discharged from hospital due to uncontrollable diarrhea. Besides, the TPN-related liver impairment developed. After extensive discussion with the patient and his family, small-bowel transplantation was performed on April 15, 1999. An auxilliary liver was simultaneously transplanted for the purpose of both restoring his liver function and protecting the intestinal graft from rejection. We did not remove his own liver.

Transplantation procedures
The donor is a brain death adult. Both donor and recipient were blood group O. The donorHLA phenotype was A11,-;B75, -; DR12, 15 and DQ6 (1),-. The recipient's HLA phenotype was A2,23;B44,62;DR7,- and DQ2,5. The lymphocytotoxic crossmatch was negative. No pretreatment was given to alter the graft immunogenicity with antilymphocyte or other modalities.
      To reduce the volume of donor liver, left lateral lobectomy and right frontal lobectomy were performed. The reduced liver and small bowel including the duodenum, jejunum and partial ileum were grafted into the abdominal cavity of the recipient. The donor's
abdominal aorta duct containing the origins of the superior mesenteric artery and coeliac artery was anastomosed end-to-side to the recipient's infrarenal aorta. The donor's infrahepatic vena cava was anastomosed end-to-side to the recipient's infrarenal vena cava. The end of the donor jejunum was anastomosed to recipient's duodemum; intestinal continuity was restored with an end-to-side ileocolic anastmosis. The end of the donor's ileum was exteriorized as an ileostomy (Figure 1).

Figure 1
Small-bowel and auxiliary liver allograft. A. Carrel patch containing the origin of the superior mesenteric artery and the coeliac artery is anastomosed to the recipient's aorta; B. Anastomosis of end of the donor infrahepatic vena cava to the side of recipient's vena cava; C. The reduced liver; D. Ilesotomy; E. Anastomosis of donor jejunum to the recipient's duodenum

Immunosuppression management
Methylprednisolone was given intravenously 30 min before graft revascularization (first dose of 500mg bolus) and rapidly tapered to 20 mg.d-1 over the next 10 days. Cyclosporin A by continuous intravenous infusion was begun intraoperatively (3mg.kg.L-1) to maintain the whole blood concentration of 350-450 mg.L-1 by monoclonal radioimmunoassay. Cyclophosphamide 100 mg was also given intravenously daily for the first 3 days. Prostaglandin E1 (600 mg.d-1) was began intraoperatively and continued for 20 days.

Postoperative course
Detection of graft rejection was based primarily on clinical observations and mucosal biopsies. During his postoperative course, the bowel graft developed only one histologic evidence of rejection. Mucosal biopsy on the seventh postoperative day showed lymphocyte infiltration in epithelium, slight fattening of the villi, decreased numbers of goblet cellls, but the mucosal destruction and necrosis were not observed (Figure 2). The rejection was successfully reversed by a 3 day course of methylprednisolone bolus (15mg.kg.d-1 per day in tapering doses).
      There was no clinical or histological evidence of liver rejection. The liver function including ALT, AST, Tbil, cholesterol, triglyceride returned to the normal range 5 days after surgery. On the 9th and 23rd postoperative day, laparotomy was performed because of surgical complications. During the operation, the liver was biopsied, and a normal histological appearance was found (Figure 3).
      The patient did not receive any specific treatment for preventing graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) other than the immunosuppression therapy previously described. No sign of GVHD developed. Unfortunately, some severe complications occurred including intestinal fistula, stress ulcer and bleeding, ARDS, pulmonary and abdominal infection. The patient died of heart and lungs failure 30 days after transplantation despite successful graft replacement. The histopathologic examination of specimens after death demonstrated normal structure in both intestinal and liver grafts.

Figure 2 Photomicrographs showing acute rejection with lymphocytic crytitis on the 7 th postoperative day, the mucosal destruction and necrosis were not observed (H&E, A, ×200; B. ×400).

Figure 3
Liver biopsy specimens on the 9th postoperative day showed normal appearance of the allograft (×200), no inflammatory infiltrate in the portal tract.

DISCUSSION
Liver dysfunction is a well-recognized complication of intestinal failure. Advances in TPN have allowed the patient suffering from short bowel syndrome to survive. However, in many instances total parenteral nutrition causes severe liver damage leading to cirrhosis. Thus, combined liver and small bowel transplantation becomes an established life-saving therapy for the treatment of liver disease and intestinal failure[43-46]. In the general, an orthotopic liver and small bowel are transplanted. To our knowledge, this case is the first report of transplantation of combined auxiliary reduced liver and small bowel in human. We tried to restore the patientliver function and to protect the intestinal allograft from rejection. For these reasons, an auxiliary liver was simultaneously transplanted. The auxiliary reduced liver-small bowel transplantation model represents a new, less aggressive possibility for multiorgan transplantation[31,47,48]. It offers some advantages over multivisceral transplants, including simplicity and less mortality than the combined orthotopic liver-intestinal transplantation. This procedure is useful for the patients with reversible hepatopathy associated with intestinal insufficiency because it can offer temporal or definitive hepatic support.
      Without donor pretreatment and under conventional immunosuppresive therapy, this patient had only one episode of mild intestinal rejection, which was easily reversed by treatment with Methylprednisolone. These data indicate a possible role of the auxiliary liver graft in preventing intestinal allograft rejection. In fact, the immunoprotecting effect of the liver was first described by Calne in 1969 in a porcine model[49]. The animal can reject skin, kidney and hearts rapidly. However, orthotopic and accessory heterotopic liver allografts can protect preferentially from rejection grafts of donor specific skin, kidney and heart. Injected soluble liver antigen may also protect donor specific tissue from rejection. It suggested that allogeneic liver can induce immunological tolerance in immunologically mature pigs[49]. Subsequent studies demonstrate that specific tolerance can be achieved in combined liver/small bowel transplantation after a transient rejection crisis[32-38].
      The mechanism of immunological protection of the liver is not very clearly until now[50-52]. Apoptosis of T lymphocytes may be involved in graft rejection and tolerance induction[50]. Apoptosis is a mechanism for eliminating autoreactive cells during T cell maturation in the thymus. T cells themselves use apoptosis to eliminate alloantigen-expressing donor cells during rejection responses. Apoptosis of parenchymal cells in the grafted livers correlated directly with interleukin-2 receptor expression of the infiltrating T cells. In the late phase of rejection, a peak of apoptosis in the lymphocyte infiltrate was demonstrated, characterized as predominantly apoptotic CD8+ T lymphocytes. T cell inactivation seems to result in apoptosis of cytotoxic T cell and tolerance[50]. In addition, microchimerism is associated with long-term graft acceptance in combined liver/small bowel transplantation[51,52]. Donor specific leucocytes could be detected immunhistochemically in the combined liver/small bowel group and isolated liver group in spleen, host Peyer patches, and mesenteric lymph nodes. Particularly in the liver sinusoids investigators[52] found a great number of persisting donor leukocytes in all long-term survivors in combined liver/small bowel rats. The persisting leucocytes obviously originate from the initially transplanted white cell population of the liver. The liver as constant source of antigen plus a persisting and obviously active leukocyte popuolation may provide the basis for a long-term survival of the liver graft and any cotransplanted organ.
      However, the observation period in this case was short and it is difficult to extrapolate that the complex immune responses between the donor and recipient are affirmatively associated with adding a liver graft. Moreover, other studies found that liver grafting failed to prevent intestinal rejection in human and large animal model[39-41]. Further studies are needed to determine the risks, effect on the protecting the small bowel from rejection, and feasibility of general application of this procedure.

REFERENCES
1    Johnson CP, Sarna SK, Zhu YR, Buchmann E, Bonham L, Telford GL, Roza AM, Adams MB. Effects of intestinal transplantation
      on postprandial motility and regulation of intestinal transit. Surgery 2001; 129: 6-14
2    Tzakis AG, Kato T, Nishida S, Mittal N, Neff G, Nery J, O
rien C, Ruiz P, Levi D, Pinna A. Evolution of gastrointestinal
      transplantation at the University of Miami. Transplant Proc 2001; 33: 1545-1549
3    Kaufman SS. Small bowel transplantation: selection criteria, operative techniques, advances in specific immunosuppression,
      prognosis. Curr Opin Pediatr 2001;13: 425-428
4    Quigley EM. Small intestinal transplantation. Curr Gastroenterol Rep 2001; 3: 408-411
5    Sudan DL, Kaufman SS, Shaw BW Jr, Fox IJ, McCashland TM, Schafer DF, Radio SJ, Hinrichs SH, Vanderhoof JA, Langnas AN.
      Isolated intestinal transplantation for intestinal failure. Am J Gastroenterol 2000; 95: 1506-1515
6    Sudan DL, Iverson A, Weseman RA, Kaufman S, Horslen S, Fox IJ, Shaw BW Jr, Langnas AN. Assessment of function, growth
      and development, and long-term quality of life after small bowel transplantation. Transplant Proc 2000; 32: 1211-1212
7    Pakarinen MP, Halttunen J. The physiology of the transplanted small bowel: an overview with insight into graft function.
      Scand J Gastroenterol 2000; 35: 561-577
8    Garrido V, Bond GJ, Mazariegos G, Wu T, Martin D, Colangelo J, Ezzelarab M, Fung J, Reyes J, Abu-Elmagd K. Late severe
      rejection of intestinal allografts: risks and survival outcome. Transplant Proc 2001; 33: 1556-1557
9    Bramhall SR, Minford E, Gunson B, Buckels J. Liver transplantation in UK. World J Gastroenterol 2001; 7: 602-611
10  Cavallari A, Nardo B, Caraceni P. Arterialization of the portal vein in a patient with a dearterialized liver graft and massive
      necrosis. N Engl J Med 2001; 345: 1352-1353
11  Zhu XF, Chen GH, He XS, Lu MQ, Wang GD, Cai CJ, Yang Y, Huang JF. Liver transplantation and artificial liver support in
      fulminant hepatic failure. World J Gastroenterol 2001;7: 566-568
12  Tang ZY. Hepatocellular carcinoma-Cause, treatment and metastasis.World J Gastroenterol 2001; 7: 445-454
13  Grant D. Intestinal transplantation: 1997 report of the international registry. Intestinal Transplant Registry. Transplantation
      1999; 67:1061-1064
14  Bueno BJ, Ohwada S, Kocoshis S, Mazariegos GV, Dvorchik I, Sigurdsson L, Di Lorenzo C, Abu-Elmagd K, Reyes J. Factors
      impacting the survival of children with intestinal failure referred for intestinal transplantation. J Pediatr Surg 1999; 34: 27-33
15  Thompson JS. Intestinal transplantation. Experience in the United States. Eur J Pediatr Surg 1999; 9: 271-273
16  Dionigi P, Alessiani M, Ferrazi A. Irreversible intestinal failure, nutrition support, and small bowel transplantation.
      Nutrition 2001; 17: 747-750
17  Silver HJ, Castellanos VH. Nutritional complications and management of intestinal transplant.
      J Am Diet Assoc 2000;100: 680-684
18  Cicalese L,Sileri P, Asolati M, Rastellini C, Abcarian H, Benedetti E. Infectious complications following living-related small bowel
      transplantation in adults. Transplant Proc 2001; 33: 1554-1555
19  Delis S, Kato T, Ruiz P, Mittal N, Babinski L, Tzakis A. Herpes simplex colitis in a child with combined liver and small bowel
      transplant. Pediatr Transplant 2001; 5: 374-377
20  Song WL, Wang WZ, Wu GS, Dong GL, Ling R, Ji G, Zhao JX. Evaluation of perioperative serum cytokine level in acute rejection
      in human living related small bowel transplantation. Shijie Huaren Xiaohua Zazhi 2001; 9: 401-404
21  Li YX, Li JS, Li N. Improved technique of vascular anastomosis for small intestinal transplantation in rats. World J Gastroenterol
      2000; 6: 259-262
22  Farmer DG, McDiarmid SV, Smith C, Stribling R, Seu P, Ament MA, Vargas J, Yersiz H, Markmann JF, Ghobriel RM, Goss JA,
      Martin P, Busuttil RW.Experience with combined liver-small intestine transplantation at the University of California, Los Angeles.
      Transplant Proc 1998; 30: 2533-2534
23  Khan FA, Kato T, Pinna AD, Berho M, Nery JR, Colombani P, Tzakis AG. Graft failure in multivisceral transplantation recipients
      secondary to necrotizing enterocolitis. Transplant Proc 2000; 32: 1204-1205
24  Muiesan P, Dhawan A, Novelli M, Mieli-Vergani G, Rela M, Heaton ND. Isolated liver transplant and sequential small bowel
      transplantation for intestinal failure and related liver disease in children. Transplantation 2000; 69: 2323-2326
25  Cicalese L, Sileri P, Green M, Abu-Elmagd K, Kocoshis S, Reyes J. Bacterial translocation in clinical intestinal transplantation.
      Transplantation 2001; 71: 1414-1417
26  Li YS, Li JS, Li N, Jiang ZW, Zhao YZ, Li NY, Liu FN. Evaluation of various solutions for small bowel graft preservation. World J
      Gastroenterol 1998; 4: 140-143
27  Dong GL, Wang WZ, Wu GS, Song WL, Ji G, Luo L, Xu JL, Zhao CH. Strategy of nutritional support for a patient with partial live
      small bowel transplantation during perioperation. Shijie Huaren Xiaohua Zazhi 2000; 8: 539-541
28  Raofi V, Holman DM, Dunn TB, Fontaine MJ, Mihalov MM, Vitello JM, Asolati M, Benedetti E. Comparison of rejection rate and
      functional outcome of small bowel transplantation alone or in conjunction with the ileocecal valve versus combined small and
      large bowel transplantation. Clin Transplant 1999; 13: 389-394
29  Todo S, Tzakis AG, Abu-Elmagd K, Reyes J, Nakamura K, Casavilla A, Selby R, Nour BM, Wright H, Fung JJ, Demetris AJ,
      Van-Thiel DH, and Trarzl TE.Intestinal transplantation in composite visceral grafts or alone. Ann Surg 1992; 216: 223-233
30  Goulet O. Intestinal failure in children. Transplant Proc 1998; 30: 2523-2525
31  Grant D, Wall W, Mimeault R, Zhong R, Ghent C, Garcia B, Stiller C, Duff J. Successful small-bowel/liver transplantation. Lancet
      1990; 335: 181-184
32  Zhong R, He G, Sakai Y, Li XC, Garcia B, Wall W, Duff J, Stiller C, Grant D. Combined small bowel and liver transplantation in
      the rat: possible role of the liver in preventing intestinal allograft rejection. Transplantation 1991; 52: 550-576
33  Li X, Zhong R, He G, Sakai Y, Quan D, Garcia B, Duff J, Grant D. Host immunosuppression after combined liver/intestine
      transplantation in the rat. Transplant Proc 1992; 24: 1206-1207
34  Meyer D, Gassel HJ, Timmermann W, Otto C, Ulrichs K, Thiede A. Rejection rate of a small bowel allografts is reduced by liver
      transplantation. Transplant Proc 2000; 32:1287
35  Gassel HJ, Timmermann W, Meyer D, Gassel AM, Thiede A. Investigations of the immunoprotective role of the liver after
      allogeneic orthotopic combined liver-small-bowel transplantation in the rat. Transplant Proc 1997; 29: 693-694
36  de Vera ME, Reyes J, Demetris J, Mazariegos G, Schaefer N, Vargas H, Bond G, Wu T, Fung J, Starzl TE, Abu-Elmagd K.
      Isolated intestinal versus composite visceral allografts: causes of graft failure. Transplant Proc 2000; 32: 1221-1222
37  Loffeler S, Meyer D, Otto C, Gassel HJ, Timmermann W, Ulrichs K, Thiede A. Different kinetics of donor cell populations after
      isolated liver and combined liver/small bowel transplantation. Transpl Int 2000; 13(Suppl 1): 537-540
38  Meyer D, Otto C, Rummel C, Gassel HJ, Timmermann W, Ulrichs K, Thiede A.
olerogenic effect?of the liver for a small bowel
      allograft. Transpl Int 2000; 13 (Suppl 1): 123-126
39  Gruessner RWG, Nakhleh RE, Benedetti E, Pirenne J, Belani KG, Beebe D, Carr R, Troppmann C, Gruessner AC. Combined
      liver-total bowel transplantation has no immunologic advantage over total bowel transplantation alone: A prospective study in a
      porcine model. Arch Surg 1997; 132:1077-1085
40  Abu-Elmagd K,Todo S, Tzakis A, Furukawa H, Nour B, Reyes J, Nakamura K, Scotti-Foglieni C, El-Hammadi H, Kadry Z, Fung J,
      Demetris J, Starzl TE. Rejection of human intestinal allografts: alone or in combination with the liver. Transplant Proc
      1994; 26: 1430-1431
41  Velio P, Bertoglio C, Bardella MT, Bianchi PA, Andreoni B, Biffi R, Marzona L, Gatti SO, Pozzi S, Tiberio G, Galmarini D, Rossi G,
      Piazzini A, and Orsenigo R. Histologic findings after orthotopic small bowel transplantation alone or with the liver. Transplant
      Proc 1994; 26: 1632-1633
42  Theal M, McAlister VC, He G, Wright J, MacDonald AS, Bitter-Suermann H, Lee TDG. Effect of auxiliary liver transplantation on
      the simultaneously transplanted small bowel allograft. Transplant Proc 1994; 26:1620
43  Bueno J, Abu-Elmagd K, Mazariegos G, Madariaga J, Fung J, Reyes J. Composite liver-small bowel allografts with preservation
      of donor duodenum and hepatic biliary system in children. J Pediatr Surg 2000; 35: 291-296
44  de Ville de Goyet J, Mitchell A, Mayer AD, Beath SV, McKiernan PJ, Kelly DA, Mirza D, Buckles JA. En block combined
      reduced-liver and small bowel transplants: from large donors to small children. Transplantation 2000; 69:555-559
45  Gilroy R, Sudan D. Liver and small bowel transplantation: therapeutic alternatives for the treatment of liver disease and
      intestinal failure. Semin Liver Dis 2000; 20: 437-450
46  Sudan DL, Iyer KR, Deroover A, Chinnakotla S, Fox IJ Jr, Shaw BW Jr, Langnas AN. A new technique for combined liver/small
      intestinal transplantation. Transplantation 2001;72: 1846-1848
47  Calleja-Kempin J, Martin-Cavanna J, Vazquez-Estevez J, Alvarez E. Small bowel transplant combined with a reduced auxiliary
      liver graft. Transplant Proc 1997; 29: 1823-1825
48  Benedetti E, Pirenne J, Chul SM, Fryer J, Fasola C, Hakim NS, Troppmann C, Beebe DS, Carr RJ, Belani KGW. Simultaneous
      en bloc transplantation of liver, small bowel and large bowel in pigs-technical aspects. Transplant Proc 1995; 27: 341-343
49  Calne RY, Sells RA, Pena JR, Davis DR, Millard PR, Herbertson BM, Binns RM, Davies DA. Induction of immunological tolerance
      by porcine liver allografts. Nature 1969; 223: 472-476
50  Meyer D, Baumgardt S, Loeffeler S, Czub S, Otto C, Gassel HJ, Timmermann W, Thiede A, Ulrichs K. Apoptosis of T
      lymphocytes in liver and/or small bowel allografts during tolerance induction. Transplantation 1998; 66: 1530-1536
51  Meyer D, Loffeler S, Otto C, Czub S, Gassel HJ, Timmermann W, Thiede A, Ulrichs K. Donor-derived alloantigen-presenting
      cells persist in the liver allograft during tolerance induction. Transpl Int 2000; 13:12-20
52  Loffeler S, Meyer D, Rolleke G, Gassel HJ, Ulrichs K, Thiede A.Microchimerism is associated with long-term graft acceptance in
      combined liver/small bowel transplantation. Transplant Proc 1998; 30: 2555-2556

Edited by Ma JY