| P.O.Box 2345, Beijing 100023,China | World J Gastroenterol 2002 October 15;8(5):956-960 |
| Email: wcjd@public.bta.net.cn | WJG ISSN 1007-9327 CN 14-1219/ R |
| http:// www.wjgnet.com | Copyright © 2002 by The WJG Press |
Combined small bowel and reduced auxiliary liver transplantation: case report
Wei-Jie Zhang, Dun-Gui Liu, Qi-Fa Ye, Bo Sha, Fan-Jun Zhen, Hui Guo, Sui-Sheng Xia
Wei-Jie Zhang, Dun-Gui Liu,
Qi-Fa Ye, Bo Sha, Fan-Jun Zhen, Hui Guo, Sui-Sheng Xia,
Institute of Organ Transplantation, Tongji Hospital, Huazhong University of
Science and Technology, Wuhan 430030, Hubei Province, China
Correspondence to:
Dr. Wei-Jie Zhang, Institute of Organ Transplantation, Tongji Hospital, 1095 Jie
Fang Da Dao, Wuhan 430030, China. wjzhang@public.wh.hb.cn
Telephone:
+86-27-83662655 Fax: +86-27-83662892
Received
2001-05-31 Accepted 2001-09-22
Abstract
AIM: To present a case of combined small
bowel and reduced auxiliary liver transplantation.
METHODS: A 55-year-old patient with
short bowel syndrome and TPN-related liver dysfunction received small bowel
transplantation combined with a reduced auxiliary liver graft. A liver was added
to restore the patient's liver function and to protect the intestinal allograft
from rejection. His own liver was not removed.
RESULTS: Without donor pretreatment and
by conventional immunosuppresive therapy following transplantation, the patient
experienced had only one episode of mild intestinal rejection, which was easily
reversed by treatment with Methylprednisolone. No liver rejection occurred.
Unfortunately, the patient died of heart and lung failure 30d after
transplantation, despite successful graft replacement. Histopathologic
examination of specimens after death demonstrated normal structure in both
intestinal and liver grafts.
CONCLUSION: The auxiliary liver graft
might play a role in preventing intestinal allograft rejection. However, the
observation period in this case is short. Further study is needed to determine
the risks, effect on the protecting the small-bowel from rejection, and
feasibility of general application of this procedure.
Zhang WJ, Liu DG, Ye QF, Sha B, Zhen FJ, Guo H, Xia SS. Combined small bowel and
reduced auxiliary liver transplantation: case report. World J Gastroenterol 2002;
8(5):956-960
INTRODUCTION
Small bowel transplantation is a
possible choice of treatment for patients with irreversible failure of the
intestine[1-8]. Compared with the success in other solid organ
allografts, attempts at small bowel transplantation in human have got poor
results in terms of patient and graft survival[9-17]. Rejection,
immunosuppression-related infections and graft-versus-host reaction (GVHR) are
the main obstacles to clinical application[18-30].
In 1990, Grant et al[31] first
reported a case of successful small-bowel transplantation combined with a liver
graft. This patient had only one episode of mild intestinal rejection, which was
easily reversed by treatment with OKT3. She had maintained normal nutrition for
more than 2 years after surgery. The authors considered that the lack of serious
intestinal rejection in this case may be due to immunological protection
provided by the liver graft. Subsequently, some investigators demonstrated the
same observations[32-38], others reported that combined liver-bowel
transplantation has no immunologic advantage over bowel transplantation alone[39-41].
Furthermore, it has been shown that auxiliary liver transplantation had a slight
protective effect on simultaneously transplanted small bowel, and it was not as
strong as has been observed with orthotopic liver transplantation[42].
We
report a case of short-bowel syndrome and secondary TPN-related hepatic
dysfunction who received small-bowel transplantation combined with a reduced
auxiliary liver graft in our institute. After operation, only one episode of
mild intestinal rejection occurred without liver rejection.
CASE REPORT
Case history
A 55 year old patient has had
the short-bowel syndrome since February 1999 after the resection of whole small
bowel and right colon because of thrombosis of the superior mesenteric artery.
He was then alive on total parenteral nutrition (TPN), but was not discharged
from hospital due to uncontrollable diarrhea. Besides, the TPN-related liver
impairment developed. After extensive discussion with the patient and his
family, small-bowel transplantation was performed on April 15, 1999. An
auxilliary liver was simultaneously transplanted for the purpose of both
restoring his liver function and protecting the intestinal graft from rejection.
We did not remove his own liver.
Transplantation procedures
The donor is a brain death
adult. Both donor and recipient were blood group O. The donor抯 HLA
phenotype was A11,-;B75, -; DR12, 15 and DQ6 (1),-. The recipient's HLA
phenotype was A2,23;B44,62;DR7,- and DQ2,5. The lymphocytotoxic crossmatch was
negative. No pretreatment was given to alter the graft immunogenicity with
antilymphocyte or other modalities.
To reduce the volume of donor liver, left lateral
lobectomy and right frontal lobectomy were performed. The reduced liver and
small bowel including the duodenum, jejunum and partial ileum were grafted into
the abdominal cavity of the recipient. The donor's abdominal
aorta duct containing the origins of the superior mesenteric artery and coeliac
artery was anastomosed end-to-side to the recipient's infrarenal
aorta. The donor's infrahepatic vena cava was
anastomosed end-to-side to the recipient's infrarenal
vena cava. The end of the donor jejunum was anastomosed to recipient's duodemum;
intestinal continuity was restored with an end-to-side ileocolic anastmosis. The
end of the donor's ileum was exteriorized as an
ileostomy (Figure 1).
Figure 1 Small-bowel and auxiliary liver
allograft. A. Carrel patch containing the origin of the superior mesenteric
artery and the coeliac artery is anastomosed to the recipient's
aorta; B. Anastomosis of end of the donor
infrahepatic vena cava to the side of recipient's vena
cava; C. The reduced liver; D. Ilesotomy; E. Anastomosis of donor jejunum to the
recipient's duodenum
Immunosuppression management
Methylprednisolone was given
intravenously 30 min before graft revascularization (first dose of 500mg bolus)
and rapidly tapered to 20 mg.d-1 over the next 10 days. Cyclosporin A
by continuous intravenous infusion was begun intraoperatively (3mg.kg.L-1)
to maintain the whole blood concentration of 350-450 mg.L-1
by monoclonal radioimmunoassay. Cyclophosphamide 100 mg was also given
intravenously daily for the first 3 days. Prostaglandin E1 (600 mg.d-1)
was began intraoperatively and continued for 20 days.
Postoperative course
Detection of graft rejection was
based primarily on clinical observations and mucosal biopsies. During his
postoperative course, the bowel graft developed only one histologic evidence of
rejection. Mucosal biopsy on the seventh postoperative day showed lymphocyte
infiltration in epithelium, slight fattening of the villi, decreased numbers of
goblet cellls, but the mucosal destruction and necrosis were not observed
(Figure 2). The rejection was successfully reversed by a 3 day course of
methylprednisolone bolus (15mg.kg.d-1 per day in tapering doses).
There
was no clinical or histological evidence of liver rejection. The liver function
including ALT, AST, Tbil, cholesterol, triglyceride returned to the normal range
5 days after surgery. On the 9th and 23rd postoperative day, laparotomy was
performed because of surgical complications. During the operation, the liver was
biopsied, and a normal histological appearance was found (Figure 3).
The patient did not receive any specific
treatment for preventing graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) other than the
immunosuppression therapy previously described. No sign of GVHD developed.
Unfortunately, some severe complications occurred including intestinal fistula,
stress ulcer and bleeding, ARDS, pulmonary and abdominal infection. The patient
died of heart and lungs failure 30 days after transplantation despite successful
graft replacement. The histopathologic examination of specimens after death
demonstrated normal structure in both intestinal and liver grafts.
Figure 2
Photomicrographs showing acute rejection with lymphocytic crytitis on the 7 th
postoperative day, the mucosal destruction and necrosis were not observed
(H&E, A, ×200; B. ×400).
Figure 3 Liver biopsy specimens on the
9th postoperative day showed normal appearance of the allograft (×200), no
inflammatory infiltrate in the portal tract.
DISCUSSION
Liver dysfunction is a well-recognized
complication of intestinal failure. Advances in TPN have allowed the patient
suffering from short bowel syndrome to survive. However, in many instances total
parenteral nutrition causes severe liver damage leading to cirrhosis. Thus,
combined liver and small bowel transplantation becomes an established
life-saving therapy for the treatment of liver disease and intestinal failure[43-46].
In the general, an orthotopic liver and small bowel are transplanted. To our
knowledge, this case is the first report of transplantation of combined
auxiliary reduced liver and small bowel in human. We tried to restore the
patient抯 liver
function and to protect the intestinal allograft from rejection. For these
reasons, an auxiliary liver was simultaneously transplanted. The auxiliary
reduced liver-small bowel transplantation model represents a new, less
aggressive possibility for multiorgan transplantation[31,47,48]. It
offers some advantages over multivisceral transplants, including simplicity and
less mortality than the combined orthotopic liver-intestinal transplantation.
This procedure is useful for the patients with reversible hepatopathy associated
with intestinal insufficiency because it can offer temporal or definitive
hepatic support.
Without donor pretreatment and under conventional
immunosuppresive therapy, this patient had only one episode of mild intestinal
rejection, which was easily reversed by treatment with Methylprednisolone. These
data indicate a possible role of the auxiliary liver graft in preventing
intestinal allograft rejection. In fact, the immunoprotecting effect of the
liver was first described by Calne in 1969 in a porcine model[49].
The animal can reject skin, kidney and hearts rapidly. However, orthotopic and
accessory heterotopic liver allografts can protect preferentially from rejection
grafts of donor specific skin, kidney and heart. Injected soluble liver antigen
may also protect donor specific tissue from rejection. It suggested that
allogeneic liver can induce immunological tolerance in immunologically mature
pigs[49]. Subsequent studies demonstrate that specific tolerance can
be achieved in combined liver/small bowel transplantation after a transient
rejection crisis[32-38].
The mechanism of immunological protection of the
liver is not very clearly until now[50-52]. Apoptosis of T
lymphocytes may be involved in graft rejection and tolerance induction[50].
Apoptosis is a mechanism for eliminating autoreactive cells during T cell
maturation in the thymus. T cells themselves use apoptosis to eliminate
alloantigen-expressing donor cells during rejection responses. Apoptosis of
parenchymal cells in the grafted livers correlated directly with interleukin-2
receptor expression of the infiltrating T cells. In the late phase of rejection,
a peak of apoptosis in the lymphocyte infiltrate was demonstrated, characterized
as predominantly apoptotic CD8+ T lymphocytes. T cell inactivation
seems to result in apoptosis of cytotoxic T cell and tolerance[50].
In addition, microchimerism is associated with long-term graft acceptance in
combined liver/small bowel transplantation[51,52]. Donor specific
leucocytes could be detected immunhistochemically in the combined liver/small
bowel group and isolated liver group in spleen, host Peyer patches, and
mesenteric lymph nodes. Particularly in the liver sinusoids investigators[52]
found a great number of persisting donor leukocytes in all long-term survivors
in combined liver/small bowel rats. The persisting leucocytes obviously
originate from the initially transplanted white cell population of the liver.
The liver as constant source of antigen plus a persisting and obviously active
leukocyte popuolation may provide the basis for a long-term survival of the
liver graft and any cotransplanted organ.
However, the observation period in this case was
short and it is difficult to extrapolate that the complex immune responses
between the donor and recipient are affirmatively associated with adding a liver
graft. Moreover, other studies found that liver grafting failed to prevent
intestinal rejection in human and large animal model[39-41]. Further
studies are needed to determine the risks, effect on the protecting the small
bowel from rejection, and feasibility of general application of this
procedure.
REFERENCES
1 Johnson CP,
Sarna SK, Zhu YR, Buchmann E, Bonham L, Telford GL, Roza AM, Adams MB. Effects
of intestinal transplantation
on postprandial motility and regulation of
intestinal transit. Surgery 2001; 129: 6-14
2 Tzakis AG, Kato T, Nishida S, Mittal N, Neff G, Nery
J, O払rien C, Ruiz P,
Levi D, Pinna A. Evolution of gastrointestinal
transplantation
at the University of Miami. Transplant Proc 2001; 33: 1545-1549
3 Kaufman SS. Small bowel transplantation: selection
criteria, operative techniques, advances in specific immunosuppression,
prognosis.
Curr Opin Pediatr 2001;13: 425-428
4 Quigley EM. Small intestinal transplantation. Curr
Gastroenterol Rep 2001; 3: 408-411
5 Sudan DL, Kaufman SS, Shaw BW Jr, Fox IJ, McCashland
TM, Schafer DF, Radio SJ, Hinrichs SH, Vanderhoof JA, Langnas AN.
Isolated
intestinal transplantation for intestinal failure. Am J Gastroenterol
2000; 95: 1506-1515
6 Sudan DL, Iverson A, Weseman RA, Kaufman S, Horslen
S, Fox IJ, Shaw BW Jr, Langnas AN. Assessment of function, growth
and
development, and long-term quality of life after small bowel transplantation. Transplant
Proc 2000; 32: 1211-1212
7 Pakarinen MP, Halttunen J. The physiology of the
transplanted small bowel: an overview with insight into graft function.
Scand
J Gastroenterol 2000; 35: 561-577
8 Garrido V, Bond GJ, Mazariegos G, Wu T, Martin D,
Colangelo J, Ezzelarab M, Fung J, Reyes J, Abu-Elmagd K. Late severe
rejection
of intestinal allografts: risks and survival outcome. Transplant Proc
2001; 33: 1556-1557
9 Bramhall SR, Minford E, Gunson B, Buckels J. Liver
transplantation in UK. World J Gastroenterol 2001; 7: 602-611
10 Cavallari A, Nardo B, Caraceni P. Arterialization of the portal
vein in a patient with a dearterialized liver graft and massive
necrosis.
N Engl J Med 2001; 345: 1352-1353
11 Zhu XF, Chen GH, He XS, Lu MQ, Wang GD, Cai CJ, Yang Y, Huang JF.
Liver transplantation and artificial liver support in
fulminant
hepatic failure. World J Gastroenterol 2001;7: 566-568
12 Tang ZY. Hepatocellular carcinoma-Cause, treatment and
metastasis.World J Gastroenterol 2001; 7: 445-454
13 Grant D. Intestinal transplantation: 1997 report of the
international registry. Intestinal Transplant Registry. Transplantation
1999;
67:1061-1064
14 Bueno BJ, Ohwada S, Kocoshis S, Mazariegos GV, Dvorchik I,
Sigurdsson L, Di Lorenzo C, Abu-Elmagd K, Reyes J. Factors
impacting
the survival of children with intestinal failure referred for intestinal
transplantation. J Pediatr Surg 1999; 34: 27-33
15 Thompson JS. Intestinal transplantation. Experience in the
United States. Eur J Pediatr Surg 1999; 9: 271-273
16 Dionigi P, Alessiani M, Ferrazi A. Irreversible intestinal
failure, nutrition support, and small bowel transplantation.
Nutrition
2001; 17: 747-750
17 Silver HJ, Castellanos VH. Nutritional complications and
management of intestinal transplant.
J
Am Diet Assoc 2000;100: 680-684
18 Cicalese L,Sileri P, Asolati M, Rastellini C, Abcarian H,
Benedetti E. Infectious complications following living-related small bowel
transplantation
in adults. Transplant Proc 2001; 33: 1554-1555
19 Delis S, Kato T, Ruiz P, Mittal N, Babinski L, Tzakis A. Herpes
simplex colitis in a child with combined liver and small bowel
transplant.
Pediatr Transplant 2001; 5: 374-377
20 Song WL, Wang WZ, Wu GS, Dong GL, Ling R, Ji G, Zhao JX.
Evaluation of perioperative serum cytokine level in acute rejection
in
human living related small bowel transplantation. Shijie Huaren Xiaohua Zazhi
2001; 9: 401-404
21 Li YX, Li JS, Li N. Improved technique of vascular anastomosis
for small intestinal transplantation in rats. World J Gastroenterol
2000;
6: 259-262
22 Farmer DG, McDiarmid SV, Smith C, Stribling R, Seu P, Ament MA,
Vargas J, Yersiz H, Markmann JF, Ghobriel RM, Goss JA,
Martin
P, Busuttil RW.Experience with combined liver-small intestine transplantation at
the University of California, Los Angeles.
Transplant
Proc 1998; 30: 2533-2534
23 Khan FA, Kato T, Pinna AD, Berho M, Nery JR, Colombani P, Tzakis
AG. Graft failure in multivisceral transplantation recipients
secondary
to necrotizing enterocolitis. Transplant Proc 2000; 32: 1204-1205
24 Muiesan P, Dhawan A, Novelli M, Mieli-Vergani G, Rela M, Heaton
ND. Isolated liver transplant and sequential small bowel
transplantation
for intestinal failure and related liver disease in children. Transplantation
2000; 69: 2323-2326
25 Cicalese L, Sileri P, Green M, Abu-Elmagd K, Kocoshis S, Reyes
J. Bacterial translocation in clinical intestinal transplantation.
Transplantation
2001; 71: 1414-1417
26 Li YS, Li JS, Li N, Jiang ZW, Zhao YZ, Li NY, Liu FN. Evaluation
of various solutions for small bowel graft preservation. World J
Gastroenterol
1998; 4: 140-143
27 Dong GL, Wang WZ, Wu GS, Song WL, Ji G, Luo L, Xu JL, Zhao CH.
Strategy of nutritional support for a patient with partial live
small
bowel transplantation during perioperation. Shijie Huaren Xiaohua Zazhi
2000; 8: 539-541
28 Raofi V, Holman DM, Dunn TB, Fontaine MJ, Mihalov MM, Vitello JM,
Asolati M, Benedetti E. Comparison of rejection rate and
functional
outcome of small bowel transplantation alone or in conjunction with the
ileocecal valve versus combined small and
large
bowel transplantation. Clin Transplant 1999; 13: 389-394
29 Todo S, Tzakis AG, Abu-Elmagd K, Reyes J, Nakamura K, Casavilla
A, Selby R, Nour BM, Wright H, Fung JJ, Demetris AJ,
Van-Thiel
DH, and Trarzl TE.Intestinal transplantation in composite visceral grafts or
alone. Ann Surg 1992; 216: 223-233
30 Goulet O. Intestinal failure in children. Transplant Proc
1998; 30: 2523-2525
31 Grant D, Wall W, Mimeault R, Zhong R, Ghent C, Garcia B, Stiller
C, Duff J. Successful small-bowel/liver transplantation. Lancet
1990;
335: 181-184
32 Zhong R, He G, Sakai Y, Li XC, Garcia B, Wall W, Duff J, Stiller
C, Grant D. Combined small bowel and liver transplantation in
the
rat: possible role of the liver in preventing intestinal allograft rejection. Transplantation
1991; 52: 550-576
33 Li X, Zhong R, He G, Sakai Y, Quan D, Garcia B, Duff J, Grant D.
Host immunosuppression after combined liver/intestine
transplantation
in the rat. Transplant Proc 1992; 24: 1206-1207
34 Meyer D, Gassel HJ, Timmermann W, Otto C, Ulrichs K, Thiede A.
Rejection rate of a small bowel allografts is reduced by liver
transplantation.
Transplant Proc 2000; 32:1287
35 Gassel HJ, Timmermann W, Meyer D, Gassel AM, Thiede A.
Investigations of the immunoprotective role of the liver after
allogeneic
orthotopic combined liver-small-bowel transplantation in the rat. Transplant
Proc 1997; 29: 693-694
36 de Vera ME, Reyes J, Demetris J, Mazariegos G, Schaefer N,
Vargas H, Bond G, Wu T, Fung J, Starzl TE, Abu-Elmagd K.
Isolated
intestinal versus composite visceral allografts: causes of graft failure. Transplant
Proc 2000; 32: 1221-1222
37 Loffeler S, Meyer D, Otto C, Gassel HJ, Timmermann W, Ulrichs K,
Thiede A. Different kinetics of donor cell populations after
isolated
liver and combined liver/small bowel transplantation. Transpl Int 2000; 13(Suppl
1): 537-540
38 Meyer D, Otto C, Rummel C, Gassel HJ, Timmermann W, Ulrichs K,
Thiede A. 揟olerogenic
effect?of the liver for a small bowel
allograft.
Transpl Int 2000; 13 (Suppl 1): 123-126
39 Gruessner RWG, Nakhleh RE, Benedetti E, Pirenne J, Belani KG,
Beebe D, Carr R, Troppmann C, Gruessner AC. Combined
liver-total
bowel transplantation has no immunologic advantage over total bowel
transplantation alone: A prospective study in a
porcine
model. Arch Surg 1997; 132:1077-1085
40 Abu-Elmagd K,Todo S, Tzakis A, Furukawa H, Nour B, Reyes J,
Nakamura K, Scotti-Foglieni C, El-Hammadi H, Kadry Z, Fung J,
Demetris
J, Starzl TE. Rejection of human intestinal allografts: alone or in combination
with the liver. Transplant Proc
1994;
26: 1430-1431
41 Velio P, Bertoglio C, Bardella MT, Bianchi PA, Andreoni B, Biffi
R, Marzona L, Gatti SO, Pozzi S, Tiberio G, Galmarini D, Rossi G,
Piazzini
A, and Orsenigo R. Histologic findings after orthotopic small bowel
transplantation alone or with the liver. Transplant
Proc
1994; 26: 1632-1633
42 Theal M, McAlister VC, He G, Wright J, MacDonald AS, Bitter-Suermann
H, Lee TDG. Effect of auxiliary liver transplantation on
the
simultaneously transplanted small bowel allograft. Transplant Proc 1994; 26:1620
43 Bueno J, Abu-Elmagd K, Mazariegos G, Madariaga J, Fung J, Reyes
J. Composite liver-small bowel allografts with preservation
of
donor duodenum and hepatic biliary system in children. J Pediatr Surg
2000; 35: 291-296
44 de Ville de Goyet J, Mitchell A, Mayer AD, Beath SV, McKiernan
PJ, Kelly DA, Mirza D, Buckles JA. En block combined
reduced-liver
and small bowel transplants: from large donors to small children. Transplantation
2000; 69:555-559
45 Gilroy R, Sudan D. Liver and small bowel transplantation:
therapeutic alternatives for the treatment of liver disease and
intestinal
failure. Semin Liver Dis 2000; 20: 437-450
46 Sudan DL, Iyer KR, Deroover A, Chinnakotla S, Fox IJ Jr, Shaw BW
Jr, Langnas AN. A new technique for combined liver/small
intestinal
transplantation. Transplantation 2001;72: 1846-1848
47 Calleja-Kempin J, Martin-Cavanna J, Vazquez-Estevez J, Alvarez
E. Small bowel transplant combined with a reduced auxiliary
liver
graft. Transplant Proc 1997; 29: 1823-1825
48 Benedetti E, Pirenne J, Chul SM, Fryer J, Fasola C, Hakim NS,
Troppmann C, Beebe DS, Carr RJ, Belani KGW. Simultaneous
en
bloc transplantation of liver, small bowel and large bowel in pigs-technical
aspects. Transplant Proc 1995; 27: 341-343
49 Calne RY, Sells RA, Pena JR, Davis DR, Millard PR, Herbertson
BM, Binns RM, Davies DA. Induction of immunological tolerance
by
porcine liver allografts. Nature 1969; 223: 472-476
50 Meyer D, Baumgardt S, Loeffeler S, Czub S, Otto C, Gassel HJ,
Timmermann W, Thiede A, Ulrichs K. Apoptosis of T
lymphocytes
in liver and/or small bowel allografts during tolerance induction. Transplantation
1998; 66: 1530-1536
51 Meyer D, Loffeler S, Otto C, Czub S, Gassel HJ, Timmermann W,
Thiede A, Ulrichs K. Donor-derived alloantigen-presenting
cells
persist in the liver allograft during tolerance induction. Transpl Int 2000;
13:12-20
52 Loffeler S, Meyer D, Rolleke G, Gassel HJ, Ulrichs K, Thiede
A.Microchimerism is associated with long-term graft acceptance in
combined
liver/small bowel transplantation. Transplant Proc 1998; 30:
2555-2556
Edited by Ma JY