Search Article Keyword  
PubMed Submission Abstarct PDF Cited  Click Count: 2189 DownLoad Count: 451 

ISSN 1007-9327 CN 14-1219/R  World J Gastroenterol  2002; February 8(1):69-73

Pharmacokinetics of radioimmunotherapeutic agent of direct labeling mAb 188Re-HAb18

Chao Lou, Zhi-Nan Chen, Hui-Jie Bian, Jie Li, Shou-Bo Zhou


Chao Lou, Zhi-Nan Chen, Hui-Jie Bian, Department of Cell Engineering Research Centre, Jie Li, Department of Oral Cell Biology, Qingdu Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi’an 710033,Shaanxi Province, China
Shou-Bo Zhou, School of Biological Science, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, United Kingdom
Supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China, No.39700175(Dr.Hui-Jie Bian)
Correspondence to: Chao Lou, Cell Engineering Research Centre, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi’an 710033,Shaanxi Province, China. wall1970@sina.com
Telephone: +86-29-3374057
Received 2001-07-19 Accepted 2001-10-24

Abstract
AIM: To label anti-hepatoma monoclonal antibody (mAb) fragment HAb18 F(ab’)2 was labeled with 188Re for the pharmacokinetic model of 188Re-HAb18 F(ab’)2 and to evaluate its pharmacokinetic parameters in hepatoma-bearing nude mice.

METHODS: HAb18 F(ab’)2 was directly labeled with 188Re using 2-mercaptoethanol (2-ME) as reducing agents. Labeling efficiency and immunoreactivity of 188Re-HAb18 F(ab’)2 were evaluated by Whatman 3MM paper chromatography and live cell assay, respectively. Biodistribution analysis was also conducted in nude mice bearing human hepatoma in which animals were sacrificed at different time points (1, 4, 18, 24 and 24h) after 188Re-HAb18 F(ab’)2 was injected through tail-vein into hepatoma-bearing nude mice. The blood and radioactivity of organs and mass were measured. The concentrations of 188Re-HAb18 F(ab’)2 were evaluated with apharmacokinetic 3P97 software.

RESULTS:
The optimum labeling efficiency and immunoreactive fraction were 91.7% and 0.78% respectively. The parameters of 188Re-HAb18 F(ab’)2 were: T1/2, 2.29h; V d,1.49×10-9 L·Bq-1;AUC, 20.49×109Bq·h·L-1;CL, 0.45×10-3 L·h-1. 188Re-HAb18 F(ab’)2 could locate specially in hepatoma with high selective reactivity of HAb18 F(ab’)2. 188Re-HAb18 F(ab’)2 was mainly eliminated by kidney. The maximal tumor to blood ratio was at 48h, and maximal tumor to liver ratio was at 18h.

CONCLUTION: The pharmacokinetics of 188Re-HAb18 F(ab’)2 fit a l-compartment model.188Re-HAb18 F(ab’)2 can be uptaken selectively at the hepatoma site.

Lou C, Chen ZN, Bian HJ, Li J, Zhou SB. Pharmacokinetics of radioimmunotherapeutic agent of direct labeling mAb 188 Re-HAb18. World J Gastroenterol 2002;8(1):69-73

INTRODUCTION
188Re is a new radioisotope[1-16]. In the past,131I was used as the main radioisotope for radioimmunotherapy(RAIT). 131I has its favour such as simple labeling, appropriate partical energy and path length,but the high energy of γ-ray produced harmness to the whole body, andβ-energy(Emax,0.6MeV) was low[17-22]. So scientists have searched for more effective radioisotope. Rhenium-188 is of particular interest to this study as the 188Re may be obtained from the 188W/ 188Re generator, and 188Re decays by β- emission with energies (Emax=2.12MeV) similar to 90Y and γ photons (Eγ=155keV; aboundance=15%) that are useful for dosimetry calculations and radioimmunoimaging, with a half-time of 17h. Furthermore, 188Re has chemical properties similar to 99Tc m, thus it can be conjugated to antibodies modeling on 99Tc m labeling methods using direct or indirect method[23-29]. Direct methods require attaching the reduced form of Re to the endogenous thiols of antibodies, whereas indirect methods require the reduced Re to be complexed by a bifunctional chelator that is conjugated to the antibody[30-32]. There has been considerable interest in the direct labeling of mAb, which would result in the formation of an instant kit formulation for imaging or therapy.
      188Re can be provided at reasonable costs for routine preparation of radiopharmaceuticals for cancer treatment. 188Re is an important therapeutic radioisotope which is obtained on demand as carrier-free sodium perrhentate by saline elution of the tungsten-188/rhenium-188 generator system.Because of its prominent physical characters, 188Re will become a new therapeutic isotope.188 Re is a radioisotope currently under evaluation for a variety of therapeutic application, including that for metastatic bone pain and therapy in oncology.
      The HAb18 antibody is a murine IgG1 anti-hepatoma monoclonal antibody under investigation in our laboratory. It does not cross react with normal liver cells, and only rarely with other malignant tissues. Due to the smaller size, easier penetration into tumor tissues, rapid clearance from circulation, and less human anti-mouse antibody (HAMA) reaction, F(ab’)2 fragments showed that tumor localization is faster and better than the intact antibody. Previous studies of 99Tcm labeled with HAb18 F(ab’)2 indicated that the conjugate is effective to detect hepatoma in the nude mice model[33]. The results encourage us to continue the radioimmunotherapy for hepatoma using 188Re labeled with HAb18 F(ab’)2. we have studied the pharmacokinetics of 188Re-HAb18 F(ab’)2 in hepatoma-bearing nude mice in order to prove if 188Re-HAb18 F(ab’)2 was located specially in hepatoma, to establish the pharmacokinetical model and get the parameters of pharmacokinetics.

MATERIALS AND METHODS
Animals
Five-week Balb/c nude mice( derived from Experimental Animals Center of our university) were implated with 1×107(0.2mL) human hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) cells in the right thigh. When the diameter of the tumors reached 1cm, the tumor bearing mice would be investigated further.

Monoclonal antibody fragment
HAb18 F(ab’)2 fragment was generated by pepsin digestion and phenyl-sepharose HP column purification with a relative molecular mass of 110,000. The solution containing the antibody fragment was concentrated by lypholization and reconstituted with distilled water.

Isotope
A 7.4GBq 188W/ 188Re generator was eluted with normal saline.

Radiolabeling
The antibody concentrated at 5g·L-1 was reduced by reaction with a molar excess of 2-ME at 4
for 20-30 min. The reduced antibody was isolated from reductant through a PD-10 column (Pharmacia) equilibrated with 0.05 mol·L-1 acetate-buffered saline.
       For labeling, the reduced HAb18 F(ab’)2 was mixed with glucoheptonate (GH) solution, SnCl2 solution, and 50-100μL perihenium solution for 2-3 h at 37
before it was analyzed by Whatman 3MM paper chromatography which was then developed in 100 g·L-1 trichloroacetic acid (TCA). R f (distance of some composition moved/distance of extended reagent moved) values for 100 g·L-1 TCA are: mAb 0.0, 188Re-GH 0.7, and 188ReO-4 0.7. Labeled mAb was differentiated from 188Re colloid by the method of Thrall et al [33]. The same strips impregnated with 10-20 g·L-1 human serum albumin before development with 5V:2V:1V; water: ethanol: 5 mol·L-1 NH4OH(volum ratio). Colloid remained on the bottom of the strip while mAb-bound isotope migrated with the solvent front.

Immunoreactivity assessment
The in vitro immunoreactivity of the radiolabeled HAb18 F(ab’)2 was evaluated by a live cell assay[9]. Briefly, 5×109·L-1 HCC cells were centrifuged at 1000 r·min-1 for 5 min and washed twice with 1 g·L-1 bovine serum albumin (BSA) in PBS, then 5 serial 1:2 dilutions were made up in 10 g·L-1 BSA in Eppendorf tubes precoated with BSA. Radiolabeled HAb18 F(ab’)2 at a mass concentration of 40μg·L-1 in 10 g· L-1 BSA was added using a volume equal to half the volume of cell suspension. The total volume of cell-binding assay solution was 0.3 mL. After incubation for 2 h at 37
, the total as well as the cell-bound radioactivity were counted in a gamma counter.

Study of biodistribution in nude mice
Fifteen hepatoma-bearing nude mice were divided into 5 groups randomly, the mice were tail-vein injected via tail vein with 1.85MBq 188Re-HAb18 F(ab’)2 in a volume of 0.1 mL and then they were sacrificed at 1, 4, 18, 24 and 48h (3 mice at each time). Samples of tumor, heart, liver, spleen, lung, kidney, large intestine, small intestine, muscle,bone were taken and weighed carefully. In addition, the blood sample was drawn from the heart. The radioactive concentrations in tissues were calculated and expressed as percent injected dose per gram(%ID·g-1 ). The radioactivity of tumor/no tumor(T/NT) was also calculated.

Pharmacokinitics

The concentrations of blood and other organs were mounted by 3P97 software to get the parameters of pharmacokinetics and established the mode of pharmacokinetics was established.

RESULTS
Table 1 shows the biodistribution of 188Re-HAb18 F(ab’)2. The blood concentration was measured by 3P97 software, which fits the 1-compartment model(Table 3). Figure 1 shows the curve of concentration-time in nude mice, and Table 2 shows the parameters of pharmacokinitics. The half-time(h) of each tissue was: tumor (32.99), blood (2.99), lung (5.67), bone (11.76), muscle (9.22), small intestine (7.47), large intestine (15.08), heart (2.29), liver (5.67), spleen (19.76),and kidney (11.53). Table 4 illustrates the influence of various concentrations of SnCl2 and GH on the free 188ReO-4 amounts, colloid amounts and labeling efficiency. Optimal complexation with labeling efficiency of 91.7% was achieved in 0.8 mol·L-1 GH and 2 g·L-1 SnCl2 solution. As shown in Figure 2, the immunoreactive fraction, 0.78 was determined by plotting the inverse of the bound fraction as compared with the inverse of the cell concentration, which is based on the assumption that the total antigen concentration (i.e., cell density) is a good approximation for the free antigen concentration.

Table 1 Biodistribution of 188Re-HAb18 F(ab')2 in hepatoma-bearing nude mice

Tissue

 t(post-inj)/h

188Re-HAb18 F(ab’)2

%ID·g-1(mean±SD)

T/NT ratio

Tumor

1

3.01±0.89

ND

 

4

3.94±0.82

ND

 

18

3.43±0.28

ND

 

24

1.96±0.43

ND

 

48

0.99±0.32

ND

Blood

1

4.58±0.63

0.66

 

4

1.83±0.10

2.15

 

18

0.21±0.04

16.30

 

24

0.18±0.03

10.90

 

48

0.05±0.01

19.80

Heart

1

1.60±0.38

1.88

 

4

0.80±0.10

4.92

 

18

0.36±0.03

9.53

 

24

0.30±0.02

6.53

 

48

0.21±0.03

4.71

Liver

1

2.07±0.40

1.45

 

4

1.57±0.31

2.51

 

18

0.77±0.12

4.45

 

24

0.66±0.10

2.97

 

48

 0.47±0.13

2.11

Spleen

1

1.22±0.25

2.47

 

4

0.91±0.22

4.33

 

18

0.47±0.07

7.30

 

24

0.45±0.08

4.36

 

48

0.41±0.10

2.40

Lung

1

1.45±0.23

2.08

 

4

0.86±0.29

4.58

 

18

0.19±0.04

18.10

 

24

0.18±0.04

10.90

 

48

0.14±0.05

7.07

Kidney

1

59.81±14.52

0.05

 

4

47.83±12.87

0.08

 

18

18.72±4.94

0.18

 

24

15.80±0.99

0.12

 

48

7.31±2.10

0.13

Large

1

1.36±0.38

2.21

intestine

4

0.93±0.24

4.24

 

18

0.57±0.06

6.02

 

24

0.45±0.00

4.36

 

48

0.18±0.03

5.50

Small

1

1.61±0.43

1.87

intestine

4

0.88±0.29

4.24

 

18

0.33±0.05

10.40

 

24

0.29±0.05

6.76

 

48

0.13±0.05

7.62

Muscle

1

0.74±0.29

4.07

 

4

0.44±0.12

8.95

 

18

0.19±0.08

18.10

 

24

0.16±0.06

12.25

 

48

0.05±0.02

19.80

Bone

1

1.03±0.31

2.92

 

4

0.68±0.12

5.79

 

18

0.31±0.09

11.06

 

24

0.27±0.02

7.26

 

48

0.16±0.02

6.19

Table 2 Pharmacokinetic parameters of 188Re-HAb18 F(ab’)2 in hepatoma-bearing nude mice

Parameter

Unit

Value

Standard error

C0

1×109Bq·L-1

6.18

3.14E-01

Ke

h-1

0.30

2.88E-02

Vd

1×10-9

L·Bq-1

1.49

T1/2(Ke)

h

2.29

 

AUC

1×109Bq·h·L-1

20.49

 

CL

1×10-3L·h-1

0.45

 

CO: Concentration at zero time Ke: Elimination rate constant Vd: Apparent volume of distribution T1/2:Half-life time AUC: Area under the curve CL: Clearance

Table 3 Criteria for goodness of fitting for mean

REC No.

Mean No

WT

No.of camp

Weighted sum of squarers

R

R Squares

Goodness
 of fit

Max error
C-CI

Max
error %

AIC

1

1

1

1

0.672E-01

0.9993

0.9955

0.150

0.18

100.00

-9.499

2

1

1/c

1

0.329E+00

0.9856

0.9781

0.331

0.52

99.1

-1.560

3

1

1/cc

1

0.119E+01

0.9200

0.9207

0.630

3.58

78.2

4.877

Table 4 Effect of various concentration of SnCl2 and GH on free 188ReO-4 amounts, colloid amounts and labeling efficiency

Concentration

 

188ReO-4

Colloid

Labeling fficiency(%)

aSnCl2 (g·L-1)

8

0.3

3.6

90.9

4

0.4

2.8

90.1

2

9.7

2.1

82.7

1

21.8

1.2

71.2

bGH (mol·L-1)

0.8

1.1

1.1

91.7

0.4

12.5

2.5

78.8

0.2

16.6

2.8

72.7

0.1

20.6

4.1

71.3

a Molar ratio of 2-ME: F(ab’)2 = 400:1,Concentration of GH=0.5 mol·L-1 b Molar ratio of 2-ME: F(ab’)2 = 400:1,Concentration of SnCl2=2 g·L-1

Figure 1(PDF) Concentration-time curve of 188Re -HAb18 F(ab’)2 in nude mice
Figure 2(PDF) Binding assay for determination of immunoreactive fraction of 188Re-labeled HAb18 F(ab’)2.

DISCUSSION
The occurrence of hepatoma is high in Southeast Asia, East Africa and Middle Africa. In China, hepatoma is one of the most three common cancers related death, but there is no effective treatment.[34-45]The therapy of hepatoma includes surgical operation, chemotherapy and radiotherapy. Targeting diagnosis and therapy of hepatoma with anti-hepatoma Mab have been developed quickly,giving a hopeful prospect to hepatoma treatment. Our reaserch focuses on the targeting therapy of hepatoma.[46-48]188Re is a generator-produced radioistope which can be obtained. There were some studies on the biodistribution and pharmacokinetics of 188Re-mAb. Safavy et al [49] have reported biodistribution of 188Re-labelded trisuccin-HuCC49 and tisuccin-C49deltaCh2 conjugates in athymic nude mice bearing intraperitoneal coloncer xenografts.188Re-labeled mAb was injected,and the mice were sacrificed 24h postinjection. Biodistribution of the radiolabeled mAb at 24h after injection showed median tumor uptake values of 23.5%ID·g-1 and 17.6%ID·g-1 for the 188Re-C49deltaCh2 and 188Re-HuCC49,respectively. Yang et al [50] have prepared the conjugate of staphy-lococcal exterotoxin A(SEA) protein which is a bacterical Sag and the F(ab’)2 fragment of HAb18. The F(ab’)2 fragment of mAb HAb18 was prepared by papainic digestion method. The conjugate of mAb HAb18 F(ab’)2 fragment and SEA was prepared with chemical conjugating reagent N-succinimidy1-3-(2-pyirdyldithio) propionate (SPDP) and purified through chromatography column Superose 12 with FPLC system. The molecular mass was identified with SDS-PAGE assay,the antibody activity of in the conjugate was determined by indirect immunocytochemical ABC method. SEA is a protein, the method of labeling is indirect, SEA and antibody are conjugated by SPDP. 188Re’s labeling method is direct,it is more convienient and quicker than indirect method. In the animal experiment, 188Re -HAb18F(ab’)2 can inhibit the growth of tumor, but the pharmacokinetics of 188Re- HAb18F(ab’)2 in animal is seldom reported. 188Re- HAb18F(ab’)2 can last a long time at a high level (Table 1). The maximal ratio of tumor: bLood was at 48h, and maximal ratio of tumor: liver was at 18h. From Table l, we can also find that after 1, 4, and 24 h( iv) injection, the radio percent of tumor is 3.83%, 6.48%, and 9.74%, the liver is 1.64%,2.59% and 3.19%, the kidney is 76.24%, 78.8% and 76.3% respectively, showing that the antibody and its fragments were eliminated from kidney[51-52]. The half-time of 188Re- HAb18 F(ab’)2 in the tumor was 32.99h, it was longer in tumor than that in other organs, this indicated that 188Re- HAb18 F(ab’)2 was located in tumor, the rate of decay was low. It also showed that the mAb was specifically combined with tumor tissues and its harmness to normal tissues was low. Pharmacokinetic parameters (AUC, blood clearance, half-life, etc) were generated using the 3P97 software.
      From 3P97 software, we can see the pharmacokinecs of conform to a 1-compartment model.Table 3 shows the criteria for goodness of fitting. we can judge the compartments from R squares, goodness of fit and AIC.1,1/C,1/C/C represented three weights.To the same weight,when the F test has marked significance (P<0.05 orP<0.01),we should choose the compartment of small AIC,and when the F test has not prominent significance (P>0.05),we should choose the small compartment.[53] From Table 3, it can be seen that the 1- compartment model is the best. 188Re-HAb18 F(ab’)2 can distribute to the whole body instantly.The elimination rate was corresponded to the concentration of the drug. The higher the concentration was, the higher the speed of elimination was. The half-time was 32.99h in tumor, being much longer than that in any other organs.It showed that 188Re- HAb18 F(ab’)2 was located specifically in hepatoma and the elimination was low. It also showed the higher selective reactivity of HAb18
F(ab’)2 with hepatoma,the harmness to other organs was small. The half-time was 2.29h in blood, and was 32.99h in tumor,the radioation of blood can decrease more rapidly than that of the tumor. The half-time of 188Re was 17h, which was also lower than that in blood, so the 188Re can be eliminated through the blood. It has excellent value in the clinical therapy.[54-62]
      Carrier-free 188Re is one of β emitting radionuclides recommended for RAIT because of suitable decay characteristics and availability from 188W/ 188Re generator. Some methods are reported in the literature for labeling mAb with 188Re which imitate the labeling method of 99Tcm. 188Re eluted from generator will not bind to organic ligands without reduction to a lower oxidation state. We selected SnCl2 as reductant and GH as transfer ligand and stablizer to avoid Sn- or Re-collide formation. Table 1 shows that the concentration of SnCl2 and GH solutions is an important parameter to obtain good labeling results. The low percentage of free 188ReO-4 and radiocolloid shows that 0.8 mol·L-1 GH and 2g·L-1 SnCl2 are the optimal values. Under these conditions, the labeled HAb18
F(ab’)2 keeps its immunoreactivity (Figure 2).
      We believe that a variety of factors make 188Re a potential alternative to other β-emitting radionuclides for RAIT. They include an efficient generator system and the direct labeling of IgG at high specific activity. The enchanced clearance of 188 Re- IgG from the circulation and the retention of immunoreactivity and tumortargeting of the Re-mAb conjugate are also important factors. In addition, the low-energy(155keV,15%)γ emission for imaging and the lack of accretion of metabolic products in nontarget tissues are important characteristics for further evaluation of 188Re-labeled antibodies for tumor therapy.

REFERENCES
1    Guhlke S, Beets AL, Oetjen K, Mirzadeh S, Biersack HJ, Knapp FF Jr. Simple new method for effective concentration 
      of 188Re solutions from alumina-based 188W- 188Re generator. J Nucl Med 2000; 41: 1271-1278
2    Jeong JM, Lee YJ, Kim YJ, Chang YS, Lee DS, Chung JK, Song YW, Lee MC. Preparation of rhenium-188-tin colloid as a
      radiation synovectomy agent and comparison with rhenium-188-sulfur colloid. Appl Radiat Isot 2000; 52: 851-855
3    Kotzerke J; Glatting G; Seitz U, Rentschler M, Neumaier B, Bunjes D, Duncker C, Dohr D, Bergmann L, Reske-SN
      Radioimmunotherapy for the intensification of conditioning before stem cell transplantation: differences in dosimetry 
      and biokinetics of 188Re- and 99mTc-labeled anti-NCA-95 mAbs. J Nucl Med 2000; 41: 531-537
4    Sykes TR, Somayaji VV, Bier S, Woo TK, Kwok CS, Snieckus V, Noujaim AA. Radiolabeling of monoclonal antibody 
      B43.13 with rhenium-188 for immunoradiotherapy. Appl Radiat Isot 1997; 48: 899-906
5    Sharkey RM, Blumenthal RD, Behr TM, Wong GY, Haywood L, Forman D, Griffiths GL, Goldenberg DM. Selection of
      radioimmunoconjugates for the therapy of well-established or micrometastatic colon carcinoma. Int J Cancer
      1997; 72: 477-485
6    Roka R, Sera T,Pajor L, Thurzo L, Lang J, Csernay L, Pavics L. Clinical experience with rhenium-188 HEDP therapy for
      metastatic bone pain. Orv Hetil 2000; 141: 1019-1023
7    Wunderlich G, Pinkert J, Andreeff M, Stintz M, Knapp FF Jr, Kropp J, Franke WG. Preparation and biodistribution of 
      rhenium -188 labeled albumin microspheres B 20: a promising new agent for radiotherapy. Appl Radiat Isot 
      2000; 52: 63-68
8    Zimmerman BE, Cessna JT, Unterweger MP, Li AN, Whiting JS, Knapp FF Jr. A new experimental determination of the 
      dose calibrator setting for 188Re. J Nucl Med , 1999; 40: 1508 -1516
9    Knapp FF Jr. Rhenium-188-a generator-derived radioisotope for cancer therapy. Cancer Biother Radiopharm 
      1998; 13: 337-349 10 Hafeli UO, Roberts WK, Meier DS, Ciezki JP, Pauer GJ, Lee EJ, Weinhous MS. Dosimetry of a 
      W-188/Re-188 beta line source for endovascular brachytherapy. Med Phys 2000; 27: 668-675
11  Juweid M, Sharkey RM, Swayne LC, Griffiths GL, Dunn R, Goldenberg DM. Pharmacokinetics, dosimetry and toxicity of 
      rhenium -188-labeled anti-carcinoembryonic antigen monoclonal antibody, MN-14, in gastrointestinal cancer [see 
      comments]. J Nucl Med 1998; 39: 34-42
12  Junfeng Y, Duanzhi Y, Xiaofeng M, Zili G, Jiong Z, Yongxian W, Knapp FF Jr. 188Re Rhenium sulfide suspension: a
      potential radiopharmaceutical for tumor treatment following intra-tumor injection. Nucl Med Biol 1999; 26: 573-579
13  Chen J, Giblin MF, Wang N, Jurisson SS, Quinn TP. In vivo evaluation of 99mTc/188Re-labeled linear alpha-melanocyte
      stimulating hormone analogs for specific melanoma targeting. Nucl Med Biol 1999; 26: 687-693
14  Iznaga-Escobar N. 188Re-direct labeling of monoclonal antibodies for radioimmunotherapy of solid tumors:
      biodistribution, normal organ dosimetry, and toxicology. Nucl Med Biol 1998; 25: 441-447
15  Palmedo H, Guhlke S, Bender H, Sartor J, Schoeneich G, Risse J, Grunwald F, Knapp FF Jr, Biersack HJ. Dose escalation 
      study with rhenium-188 hydroxyethylidene diphosphonate in prostate cancer patients with osseous metastases.
      Eur J Nucl Med 2000; 27: 123-130
16  Melendez Alafort L, Ferro Flores G, Arteaga Murphy C, Pedraza Lopez M, Gonzalez Zavala MA, Tendilla JI, Garcia 
      Salinas L. Labeling peptides with rhenium-188. Int J Pharm 1999; 182: 165-172
17  van Zanten Przybysz I, Molthoff CF, Ross JC, Plaizier MA, Visser GW, Pijpers R, Kenemans P, Verheijen RH. 
      Radioimmunotherapy with intravenously administered 131I-labeled chimerical monoclonal antibody Mov18 in patients 
      with ovarian cancer. J Nucl Med 2000;41:1168-1176
18  Behr TM, Behe M, Lohr M, Sgouros G, Angerstein C, Wehrmann E, Nebendahl K, Becker W. Therapeutic advantages of
      Auger electron-over beta-emitting radiometals radioiodine when conjugated to internalizing antibodies.
      Eur J Nucl Med 2000;27:753-756
19  Clarke K, Lee FT, Brechbiel MW, Smyth FE, Old LJ, Scott AM. Therapy efficacy of anti-Lewis(y) humanized
      3S193 radioimmunotherapy a breast cancer model: enhanced activity when combined with taxol chemotherapy.
      Clin Cancer Res 2000;6:3621-3628
20  Barendswaard EC, O’Donoghue JA,Larson SM, Tschmelitsch J, Welt S, Finn RD, Humm JL. 131I radioimmunotherapy
      and fractionated external beam radiotherapy: comparative effectiveness in a human tumor xenograft.
      J Nucl Med 1999;40:1764-1768
21  Smith Jones PM, Vallabahajosula S, Goldsmith SJ, Navarro V, Hunter CJ, Bastidas D, Bander NH. In vitro characterization
      of radiolabeled monoclonal antibodies specific for the extracellular domain of prostate-specific membrane antigen.
      Cancer Res 2000;60:5237-5243
22  Juweid ME, Zhang CH, Blumenthal RD, Hajjar G, Sharkey RM, Goldenberg DM. Prediction of hematologic toxicity
      after radioimmunotherapy with 131I-labeled anticarcinoembryonic antigen monoclonal antibodies. J Nucl Med
      1999;40:1609-1616
23  Natowich DJ, Mardirossian G, Ruscowski M, Fogarasi M, Virzi F, Winnard-Jr P. Directly and indirectly
      technetium-99m-labeled antibodies-a comparison of in vitro and animal in vivo properties. J Nucl Med
      1993; 34: 109-119
24  Colnot DR, Quak JJ, Roos JC, van Lingen A, Wilhelm AJ. Phase I therapy study of 186Re-labeled chimeric monoclonal 
      antibody U36 in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. J Nucl Med 2000; 41: 1999-2010
25  Lechner P, Lind P, SnyderM, Haushofer H.Probe-guided surgery for colorectal cancer. Recent Results Cancer Res
      2000; 157273-157280
26  Willkomm P, Bender H, Bangard M, Decker P, Grunwald F, Biersack H J. FDG PET and immunoscintigraphy with
      99mTc-labeled antibody fragments for detection of the recurrence of colorectal carcinoma. J Nucl Med
      2000; 41: 1657-1663
27  Line BR, Weber PB, Lukasiewicz R, Dansereau RN. Reduction of background activity through radiolabeling of antifibrin 
      Fab’ with 99mTc-dextran. J Nucl Med 2000; 41: 1264-1270
28  Amato R, Kim EE, Prow D, Andreopoulos D, Kasi LP. Radioimmunodetection of residual, recurrent or metastatic germ 
      cell tumors using technetium-99 anti-(alpha-fetoprotein) Fab’ fragment. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2000; 126: 161-167
29  Bian HJ, Chen ZN and Deng JL. Direct technetium-99m labeling of anti-hepatoma monoclonal antibody fragment:
      a radioimmunoconjugate for hepatocellular carcinoma imaging. World J Gastroenterol 2000; 6: 348-352
30  Dadachova E, Chapman J. 188Re(V)-DMSA revisited: preparation and biodistribution of a potential radiotherapeutic 
      agent with low kidney uptake. Nucl Med Commun 1998; 19: 173-181
31  Schmidt PF, Smith SV and Bundesen PG. 188Re DD-3B6/22 Fab’for use in therapy of ovarian cancer: labeling and animal
      studies. Nucl Med Biol 1998; 25: 639-649
32  Ferro-Flores G, Pimentel-Gonzalez G, Gonzalez-Zavala MA, Arteaga de Murphy C,Melendez Alafort L, Tendilla JI, 
      Croft BY. Preparation, biodistribution, and dosimetry of 188Re-labeled McAb ior ceal and its F(ab’)2 fragments by 
      avidin-biotin strategy. Nucl Med Biol 1999; 26: 57-62
33  Thrall JH, Freitas JE, Swanson D, Rogers WL, Clare JM, Brown M, Pitt B. Clinical comparison of cardiac blood pool 
      visualization with technetium-99m red blood cells labeled in vivo and with technetium-99m human serum albumin. 
      J Nucl Med 1978;19: 796-803
34  Qian S B, Li Y, Qian GX, Chen SS. Efficient tumor regression induced by genetically engineered tumor cells secreting
      interleukin-2 and membrane-expressing allogeneic MHC class I antigen. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2001; 127: 27-33
35  Dai WJ, Jiang HC. Advances in gene therapy of liver cirrhosis: a review. World J Gastroenterol 2001;7:1-8
36  Cheng ML, Wu YY, Huang KF, Luo TY, Ding YS, Lu YY, Liu RC, Wu J. Clinical study on the treatment of liver fibrosis due 
      to hepatitis B by IFN-α1 and traditional medicine preparation. World J Gastroenterol 1999;5:267-269
37  Kessel D, Caruso JA, Reiners JJ Jr. Potentiation of photodynamic therapy by ursodeoxycholic acid. Cancer Res
      2000; 60: 6985-6988
38  Yang SS, Wu CH, Chen TH, Huang YY, Huang CS. TT viral infection through blood transfusion: retrospective 
      investigation on patients in a prospective study of post transfusion hepatitis. World J Gastroenterol 2000;6:70-73
39  Kang MA, Kim KY, Seol JY, Kim KC, Nam MJ. The growth inhibition of hepatoma by gene transfer of antisense vascular
      endothelial growth factor. J Gene Med 2000; 2: 289-296
40  Ma XD, Sui YF, Wang WL. Expression of gap junction genes connexin 32, connexin 43 and their proteins in 
      hepatocellular carcinoma and normal liver tissues. World J Gastroenterol 2000;6:66-69
41  Huang ZH, Zhuang H, Lu S, Guo RH, Xu GM, Cai J, Zhu WF. Humoral and cellular immunogenecity of DNA vaccine 
      based on hepatitis B core gene in rhesus monkeys. World J Gastroenterol 2001;7:102-106
42  Fang JN, Jin CJ, Cui LH, Quan ZY, Choi BY, Ki MR, Park HB. A comparative study on serologic profiles of virus hepatitis B.
      World J Gastroenterol 2001;7:107-110
43  Tietze MK, Wuestefeld T, Paul Y, Zender L, Trautwein C, Manns MP, Kubicka S.IkappaBalpha gene therapy in tumor
      necrosis factor-alpha- and chemotherapy-mediated apoptosis of hepatocellular carcinomas. Cancer Gene Ther
      2000; 7: 1315-1323
44  Xu J, Mei MH, Zeng SE, Shi QF, Liu YM, Qin LL. Expressions of ICAMa21 and its mRNA in sera and tissues of patients
      with hepatocellular carcinoma. World J Gastroenterol 2001;7:120-125
45  Hu YP, Hu WJ, Zheng WC, Li JX, Dai DS, Wang XM, Zhang SZ, Yu HY, Sun W, Hao GR. Establishment of transgenic 
      mouse harboring hepatitis B virus (adr subtype) genomes. World J Gastroenterol 2001;7:111-114
46  Qiu K, Wang BF, Chen ZN, Fang P, Liu CG, Wan WX, Liu YF. 99mT c labeied HAb18 McAb Fab fragment for 
      radioimmunoimaging in nude mice bearing human hepatocellular carcinoma. World J Castroenterol 1998;4:117-120
47  Chen ZN, Bian HJ, Jiang JL. Kecent progress inanti-hepatoma monoclonal antibody and its application.
      Huaren Xiaohua Zazhi 1998;6:461-462
48  ickman S. Antibodies stage a comeback in cancer treament. Science 1998;280:1196-1197
49  Safavy A, Khazaeli MB, Safavy K, Mayo MS, Buchsbaum DJ. Biodistribution study of 188Re-labeled trisuccin-HuCC49
      and trisuccin-HuCC49deltaCh2 conjugates in athymic nude mice bearing intraperitoneal colon cancer xenografts.
      Clin Cancer Res 1999; 5: 2994-3000
50  Yang LJ, Sui YF, Chen ZN. Preparation and activity of conjugate of monoclonal antibody HAb18 against hepatoma F(ab’)2
      fragment and staphylococcal enterotoxin A. World J Gastroeterol 2001;7:216-221
51  Duan XD, Chen ZN, Bian HJ, Wen AD, Feng Q. Pharmacokinetics of technetium-99m labeled anti-hepatoma monoclonal
      antibody HAb18 and it’s F(ab’)2 fragment in mice. Zhongguo Yaoxue Zazhi 2000;35:465-467
52  Chen H, Gu SF, Xiao Zh, Zeng FD, Wu WZ, Zhang QH. Pharmacokinetics and bioavailability of sustained release capsules 
      of nicardipine hydrochloride in healthy volunteers. Zhongguo Yaolixue Tongbao 2000;16:107-110
53  Lan Q,Huang Q, Zhuang DL, Wu YF, Sun ZF.Study on the pharmacokinetics of immunoradiotherapeutic agent S-MAb 
      SZ39 in glioma-bearing nude mice. Zhongguo Yaoxue Zazhi 1999;34:683-686
54  Hosono MN, Hosono M, Zamora PO. Localization of colorectal carcimoma by rhenium-188-labeled B72.3 antibody in 
      xenograft mice. Ann Nucl Med 1998; 12:83-88
55  Gestin JF, Loussouarn A, Bardies M, Gautherot E, Gruaz Guyon A, Sai Maurel C, Barbet J, Curtet C, Chatal J F, Faivre 
      Chauvet A. Two-step targeting of xenografted colon carcinoma using a bispecific antibody and 188Re-labeled bivalent 
      hapten: biodistribution and dosimetry studies. J Nucl Med 2001; 42: 146-153
56  Hosono M N, Hosono M, Mishra AK, Faivre Chauvet A, Gautherot E, Barbet J, Knapp F F, Chatal JF. Rhenium-188-
      labeled anti-neural cell adhesion molecule antibodies with 2-iminothiolane modification for targeting small-cell lung 
      cancer. Ann Nucl Med 2000; 14: 173-179
57  Bian HJ, Chen ZN, Lou C, Mi L,Wang J, Yue XL. 188Re-labeled HAb18 F(ab’)2 of hepatoma radioimmunoimaging. 
      Zhongliu 2000; 20:181-183
58  Qingnuan L, Xiaodong Z, Rong S, Wenxin L. Preparation of (188Re) Re-AEDP and its biodistribution studies. Appl Radiat
      Isot 2000; 53: 993-997
59  Kostarelos K, Emfietzoglou D. Tissue dosimetry of liposome-radionuclide complexes for internal radiotherapy:
      toward liposome-targeted therapeutic radiopharmaceuticals. Anticancer Res 2000; 20: 3339-3345
60  Iznaga Escobar N, Torres LA, Morales A, Ramos M, Alvarez I, Perez N, Fraxedas R, Rodriguez O, Rodriguez N, Perez R, 
      Lage A, Stabin MG. Technetium-99m-labeled anti-EGF-receptor antibody in patients with tumor of epithelial origin: I.
      Biodistribution and dosimetry for radioimmunotherapy. J Nucl Med 1998; 39: 15-23
61  Blower PJ, Kettle AG, O’Doherty MJ, Coakley AJ, Knapp FF. 99mTc(V)DMSA quantitatively predicts 188Re(V)DMSA 
      distribution in patients with prostate cancer metastatic to bone. Eur J Nucl Med 2000; 27: 1405-1409
62  Heppeler A, Froidevaux S, Eberle AN, Maecke HR. Receptor targeting for tumor localisation and therapy with 
      radiopeptides. Curr Med Chem 2000; 7: 971-994

 

Reviews Add
more>>


Related Articles:
more>>