|
Chao
Lou, Zhi-Nan Chen, Hui-Jie Bian, Department of Cell Engineering
Research Centre, Jie Li, Department of Oral Cell Biology, Qingdu
Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi’an 710033,Shaanxi
Province, China
Shou-Bo Zhou, School of Biological Science, University of
Manchester, Oxford Road, United Kingdom
Supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China,
No.39700175(Dr.Hui-Jie Bian)
Correspondence to: Chao Lou, Cell Engineering Research Centre,
Fourth Military Medical University, Xi’an 710033,Shaanxi Province,
China. wall1970@sina.com
Telephone: +86-29-3374057
Received 2001-07-19 Accepted 2001-10-24
Abstract
AIM:
To label anti-hepatoma monoclonal antibody (mAb) fragment HAb18 F(ab’)2
was labeled with 188Re for the pharmacokinetic model of 188Re-HAb18
F(ab’)2 and to evaluate its pharmacokinetic parameters
in hepatoma-bearing nude mice.
METHODS:
HAb18 F(ab’)2 was directly labeled with 188Re
using 2-mercaptoethanol (2-ME) as reducing agents. Labeling
efficiency and immunoreactivity of 188Re-HAb18 F(ab’)2
were evaluated by Whatman 3MM paper chromatography and live cell
assay, respectively. Biodistribution analysis was also conducted in
nude mice bearing human hepatoma in which animals were sacrificed at
different time points (1, 4, 18, 24 and 24h) after 188Re-HAb18
F(ab’)2 was injected through tail-vein into hepatoma-bearing
nude mice. The blood and radioactivity of organs and mass were
measured. The concentrations of 188Re-HAb18 F(ab’)2
were evaluated with apharmacokinetic 3P97 software.
RESULTS: The optimum labeling efficiency and immunoreactive
fraction were 91.7% and 0.78% respectively. The parameters of 188Re-HAb18
F(ab’)2 were: T1/2, 2.29h; V d,1.49×10-9
L·Bq-1;AUC, 20.49×109Bq·h·L-1;CL,
0.45×10-3 L·h-1. 188Re-HAb18 F(ab’)2
could locate specially in hepatoma with high selective reactivity of
HAb18 F(ab’)2. 188Re-HAb18 F(ab’)2
was mainly eliminated by kidney. The maximal tumor to blood ratio
was at 48h, and maximal tumor to liver ratio was at 18h.
CONCLUTION:
The pharmacokinetics of 188Re-HAb18 F(ab’)2
fit a l-compartment model.188Re-HAb18 F(ab’)2
can be uptaken selectively at the hepatoma site.
Lou C, Chen ZN, Bian HJ, Li J, Zhou SB. Pharmacokinetics of
radioimmunotherapeutic agent of direct labeling mAb 188
Re-HAb18. World J Gastroenterol 2002;8(1):69-73
INTRODUCTION
188Re
is a new radioisotope[1-16]. In the past,131I
was used as the main radioisotope for radioimmunotherapy(RAIT). 131I
has its favour such as simple labeling, appropriate partical energy
and path length,but the high energy of γ-ray produced harmness
to the whole body, andβ-energy(Emax,0.6MeV) was low[17-22].
So scientists have searched for more effective radioisotope.
Rhenium-188 is of particular interest to this study as the 188Re
may be obtained from the 188W/ 188Re
generator, and 188Re decays by β- emission with
energies (Emax=2.12MeV) similar to 90Y and γ photons
(Eγ=155keV; aboundance=15%) that are useful for dosimetry
calculations and radioimmunoimaging, with a half-time of 17h.
Furthermore, 188Re has chemical properties similar to 99Tc
m, thus it can be conjugated to antibodies modeling on 99Tc
m labeling methods using direct or indirect method[23-29].
Direct methods require attaching the reduced form of Re to the
endogenous thiols of antibodies, whereas indirect methods require
the reduced Re to be complexed by a bifunctional chelator that is
conjugated to the antibody[30-32]. There has been
considerable interest in the direct labeling of mAb, which would
result in the formation of an instant kit formulation for imaging or
therapy.
188Re
can be provided at reasonable costs for routine preparation of
radiopharmaceuticals for cancer treatment. 188Re is an
important therapeutic radioisotope which is obtained on demand as
carrier-free sodium perrhentate by saline elution of the
tungsten-188/rhenium-188 generator system.Because of its prominent
physical characters, 188Re will become a new therapeutic
isotope.188 Re is a radioisotope currently under
evaluation for a variety of therapeutic application, including that
for metastatic bone pain and therapy in oncology.
The
HAb18 antibody is a murine IgG1 anti-hepatoma monoclonal
antibody under investigation in our laboratory. It does not cross
react with normal liver cells, and only rarely with other malignant
tissues. Due to the smaller size, easier penetration into tumor
tissues, rapid clearance from circulation, and less human anti-mouse
antibody (HAMA) reaction, F(ab’)2 fragments showed that
tumor localization is faster and better than the intact antibody.
Previous studies of 99Tcm labeled with HAb18 F(ab’)2
indicated that the conjugate is effective to detect hepatoma in the
nude mice model[33]. The results encourage us to continue
the radioimmunotherapy for hepatoma using 188Re labeled
with HAb18 F(ab’)2. we have studied the
pharmacokinetics of 188Re-HAb18 F(ab’)2 in
hepatoma-bearing nude mice in order to prove if 188Re-HAb18
F(ab’)2 was located specially in hepatoma, to establish
the pharmacokinetical model and get the parameters of
pharmacokinetics.
MATERIALS
AND METHODS
Animals
Five-week Balb/c nude mice( derived from Experimental Animals Center
of our university) were implated with 1×107(0.2mL) human
hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) cells in the right thigh. When the
diameter of the tumors reached 1cm, the tumor bearing mice would be
investigated further.
Monoclonal antibody fragment
HAb18 F(ab’)2 fragment was generated by pepsin
digestion and phenyl-sepharose HP column purification with a
relative molecular mass of 110,000. The solution containing the
antibody fragment was concentrated by lypholization and
reconstituted with distilled water.
Isotope
A 7.4GBq 188W/ 188Re generator was eluted with
normal saline.
Radiolabeling
The antibody concentrated at 5g·L-1 was reduced by
reaction with a molar excess of 2-ME at 4℃
for 20-30 min. The reduced antibody was isolated from reductant
through a PD-10 column (Pharmacia) equilibrated with 0.05 mol·L-1
acetate-buffered saline.
For labeling, the reduced HAb18 F(ab’)2 was mixed
with glucoheptonate (GH) solution, SnCl2 solution, and
50-100μL perihenium solution for 2-3 h at 37℃
before it was analyzed by Whatman 3MM paper chromatography which was
then developed in 100 g·L-1 trichloroacetic acid (TCA).
R f (distance of some composition moved/distance of extended reagent
moved) values for 100 g·L-1 TCA are: mAb 0.0, 188Re-GH
0.7, and 188ReO-4 0.7. Labeled mAb was differentiated
from 188Re colloid by the method of Thrall et al [33].
The same strips impregnated with 10-20 g·L-1 human serum
albumin before development with 5V:2V:1V; water: ethanol: 5 mol·L-1
NH4OH(volum ratio). Colloid remained on the bottom of the
strip while mAb-bound isotope migrated with the solvent front.
Immunoreactivity
assessment
The in vitro immunoreactivity of the radiolabeled HAb18 F(ab’)2
was evaluated by a live cell assay[9]. Briefly, 5×109·L-1
HCC cells were centrifuged at 1000 r·min-1 for 5 min and
washed twice with 1 g·L-1 bovine serum albumin (BSA) in
PBS, then 5 serial 1:2 dilutions were made up in 10 g·L-1
BSA in Eppendorf tubes precoated with BSA. Radiolabeled HAb18 F(ab’)2
at a mass concentration of 40μg·L-1 in 10 g· L-1
BSA was added using a volume equal to half the volume of cell
suspension. The total volume of cell-binding assay solution was 0.3
mL. After incubation for 2 h at 37℃,
the total as well as the cell-bound radioactivity were counted in a
gamma counter.
Study
of biodistribution in nude mice
Fifteen hepatoma-bearing nude mice were divided into 5 groups
randomly, the mice were tail-vein injected via tail vein with
1.85MBq 188Re-HAb18 F(ab’)2 in a volume of
0.1 mL and then they were sacrificed at 1, 4, 18, 24 and 48h (3 mice
at each time). Samples of tumor, heart, liver, spleen, lung, kidney,
large intestine, small intestine, muscle,bone were taken and weighed
carefully. In addition, the blood sample was drawn from the heart.
The radioactive concentrations in tissues were calculated and
expressed as percent injected dose per gram(%ID·g-1 ).
The radioactivity of tumor/no tumor(T/NT) was also calculated.
Pharmacokinitics
The concentrations of blood and other organs were mounted by 3P97
software to get the parameters of pharmacokinetics and established
the mode of pharmacokinetics was established.
RESULTS
Table 1 shows the biodistribution of 188Re-HAb18 F(ab’)2.
The blood concentration was measured by 3P97 software, which fits
the 1-compartment model(Table 3). Figure 1 shows the curve of
concentration-time in nude mice, and Table 2 shows the parameters of
pharmacokinitics. The half-time(h) of each tissue was: tumor
(32.99), blood (2.99), lung (5.67), bone (11.76), muscle (9.22),
small intestine (7.47), large intestine (15.08), heart (2.29), liver
(5.67), spleen (19.76),and kidney (11.53). Table 4 illustrates the
influence of various concentrations of SnCl2 and GH on
the free 188ReO-4 amounts, colloid
amounts and labeling efficiency. Optimal complexation with labeling
efficiency of 91.7% was achieved in 0.8 mol·L-1 GH and 2
g·L-1 SnCl2 solution. As shown in Figure 2,
the immunoreactive fraction, 0.78 was determined by plotting the
inverse of the bound fraction as compared with the inverse of the
cell concentration, which is based on the assumption that the total
antigen concentration (i.e., cell density) is a good approximation
for the free antigen concentration.
Table
1
Biodistribution of 188Re-HAb18 F(ab')2
in hepatoma-bearing nude mice
|
Tissue
|
t(post-inj)/h
|
188Re-HAb18
F(ab’)2
|
|
%ID·g-1(mean±SD)
|
T/NT
ratio
|
|
Tumor
|
1
|
3.01±0.89
|
ND
|
|
|
4
|
3.94±0.82
|
ND
|
|
|
18
|
3.43±0.28
|
ND
|
|
|
24
|
1.96±0.43
|
ND
|
|
|
48
|
0.99±0.32
|
ND
|
|
Blood
|
1
|
4.58±0.63
|
0.66
|
|
|
4
|
1.83±0.10
|
2.15
|
|
|
18
|
0.21±0.04
|
16.30
|
|
|
24
|
0.18±0.03
|
10.90
|
|
|
48
|
0.05±0.01
|
19.80
|
|
Heart
|
1
|
1.60±0.38
|
1.88
|
|
|
4
|
0.80±0.10
|
4.92
|
|
|
18
|
0.36±0.03
|
9.53
|
|
|
24
|
0.30±0.02
|
6.53
|
|
|
48
|
0.21±0.03
|
4.71
|
|
Liver
|
1
|
2.07±0.40
|
1.45
|
|
|
4
|
1.57±0.31
|
2.51
|
|
|
18
|
0.77±0.12
|
4.45
|
|
|
24
|
0.66±0.10
|
2.97
|
|
|
48
|
0.47±0.13
|
2.11
|
|
Spleen
|
1
|
1.22±0.25
|
2.47
|
|
|
4
|
0.91±0.22
|
4.33
|
|
|
18
|
0.47±0.07
|
7.30
|
|
|
24
|
0.45±0.08
|
4.36
|
|
|
48
|
0.41±0.10
|
2.40
|
|
Lung
|
1
|
1.45±0.23
|
2.08
|
|
|
4
|
0.86±0.29
|
4.58
|
|
|
18
|
0.19±0.04
|
18.10
|
|
|
24
|
0.18±0.04
|
10.90
|
|
|
48
|
0.14±0.05
|
7.07
|
|
Kidney
|
1
|
59.81±14.52
|
0.05
|
|
|
4
|
47.83±12.87
|
0.08
|
|
|
18
|
18.72±4.94
|
0.18
|
|
|
24
|
15.80±0.99
|
0.12
|
|
|
48
|
7.31±2.10
|
0.13
|
|
Large
|
1
|
1.36±0.38
|
2.21
|
|
intestine
|
4
|
0.93±0.24
|
4.24
|
|
|
18
|
0.57±0.06
|
6.02
|
|
|
24
|
0.45±0.00
|
4.36
|
|
|
48
|
0.18±0.03
|
5.50
|
|
Small
|
1
|
1.61±0.43
|
1.87
|
|
intestine
|
4
|
0.88±0.29
|
4.24
|
|
|
18
|
0.33±0.05
|
10.40
|
|
|
24
|
0.29±0.05
|
6.76
|
|
|
48
|
0.13±0.05
|
7.62
|
|
Muscle
|
1
|
0.74±0.29
|
4.07
|
|
|
4
|
0.44±0.12
|
8.95
|
|
|
18
|
0.19±0.08
|
18.10
|
|
|
24
|
0.16±0.06
|
12.25
|
|
|
48
|
0.05±0.02
|
19.80
|
|
Bone
|
1
|
1.03±0.31
|
2.92
|
|
|
4
|
0.68±0.12
|
5.79
|
|
|
18
|
0.31±0.09
|
11.06
|
|
|
24
|
0.27±0.02
|
7.26
|
|
|
48
|
0.16±0.02
|
6.19
|
Table
2
Pharmacokinetic parameters of 188Re-HAb18 F(ab’)2
in hepatoma-bearing nude mice
|
Parameter
|
Unit
|
Value
|
Standard
error
|
|
C0
|
1×109Bq·L-1
|
6.18
|
3.14E-01
|
|
Ke
|
h-1
|
0.30
|
2.88E-02
|
|
Vd
|
1×10-9
|
L·Bq-1
|
1.49
|
|
T1/2(Ke)
|
h
|
2.29
|
|
|
AUC
|
1×109Bq·h·L-1
|
20.49
|
|
|
CL
|
1×10-3L·h-1
|
0.45
|
|
CO:
Concentration at zero time Ke: Elimination rate constant Vd:
Apparent volume of distribution T1/2:Half-life time AUC:
Area under the curve CL: Clearance
Table
3 Criteria
for goodness of fitting for mean
|
REC
No.
|
Mean
No
|
WT
|
No.of
camp
|
Weighted
sum of squarers
|
R
|
R
Squares
|
Goodness
of fit
|
Max
error
C-CI
|
Max
error %
|
AIC
|
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
0.672E-01
|
0.9993
|
0.9955
|
0.150
|
0.18
|
100.00
|
-9.499
|
|
2
|
1
|
1/c
|
1
|
0.329E+00
|
0.9856
|
0.9781
|
0.331
|
0.52
|
99.1
|
-1.560
|
|
3
|
1
|
1/cc
|
1
|
0.119E+01
|
0.9200
|
0.9207
|
0.630
|
3.58
|
78.2
|
4.877
|
Table
4 Effect
of various concentration of SnCl2 and GH on free 188ReO-4
amounts, colloid amounts and labeling efficiency
|
Concentration
|
|
188ReO-4
|
Colloid
|
Labeling
fficiency(%)
|
|
aSnCl2
(g·L-1)
|
8
|
0.3
|
3.6
|
90.9
|
|
4
|
0.4
|
2.8
|
90.1
|
|
2
|
9.7
|
2.1
|
82.7
|
|
1
|
21.8
|
1.2
|
71.2
|
|
bGH
(mol·L-1)
|
0.8
|
1.1
|
1.1
|
91.7
|
|
0.4
|
12.5
|
2.5
|
78.8
|
|
0.2
|
16.6
|
2.8
|
72.7
|
|
0.1
|
20.6
|
4.1
|
71.3
|
a
Molar ratio of 2-ME: F(ab’)2 = 400:1,Concentration of
GH=0.5 mol·L-1 b Molar ratio of 2-ME: F(ab’)2
= 400:1,Concentration of SnCl2=2 g·L-1
Figure
1(PDF)
Concentration-time curve of 188Re -HAb18 F(ab’)2
in nude mice
Figure
2(PDF)
Binding assay for determination of immunoreactive fraction of 188Re-labeled
HAb18 F(ab’)2.
DISCUSSION
The
occurrence of hepatoma is high in Southeast Asia, East Africa and
Middle Africa. In China, hepatoma is one of the most three common
cancers related death, but there is no effective treatment.[34-45]The
therapy of hepatoma includes surgical operation, chemotherapy and
radiotherapy. Targeting diagnosis and therapy of hepatoma with anti-hepatoma
Mab have been developed quickly,giving a hopeful prospect to
hepatoma treatment. Our reaserch focuses on the targeting therapy of
hepatoma.[46-48]188Re is a generator-produced radioistope
which can be obtained. There were some studies on the
biodistribution and pharmacokinetics of 188Re-mAb. Safavy
et al [49] have reported biodistribution of 188Re-labelded
trisuccin-HuCC49 and tisuccin-C49deltaCh2 conjugates in athymic nude
mice bearing intraperitoneal coloncer xenografts.188Re-labeled
mAb was injected,and the mice were sacrificed 24h postinjection.
Biodistribution of the radiolabeled mAb at 24h after injection
showed median tumor uptake values of 23.5%ID·g-1 and
17.6%ID·g-1 for the 188Re-C49deltaCh2 and 188Re-HuCC49,respectively.
Yang et al [50] have prepared the conjugate of
staphy-lococcal exterotoxin A(SEA) protein which is a bacterical Sag
and the F(ab’)2 fragment of HAb18. The F(ab’)2
fragment of mAb HAb18 was prepared by papainic digestion method. The
conjugate of mAb HAb18 F(ab’)2 fragment and SEA was
prepared with chemical conjugating reagent
N-succinimidy1-3-(2-pyirdyldithio) propionate (SPDP) and purified
through chromatography column Superose 12 with FPLC system. The
molecular mass was identified with SDS-PAGE assay,the antibody
activity of in the conjugate was determined by indirect
immunocytochemical ABC method. SEA is a protein, the method of
labeling is indirect, SEA and antibody are conjugated by SPDP. 188Re’s
labeling method is direct,it is more convienient and quicker than
indirect method. In the animal experiment, 188Re
-HAb18F(ab’)2 can inhibit the growth of tumor, but the
pharmacokinetics of 188Re- HAb18F(ab’)2 in
animal is seldom reported. 188Re- HAb18F(ab’)2
can last a long time at a high level (Table 1). The maximal ratio of
tumor: bLood was at 48h, and maximal ratio of tumor: liver was at
18h. From Table l, we can also find that after 1, 4, and 24 h( iv)
injection, the radio percent of tumor is 3.83%, 6.48%, and 9.74%,
the liver is 1.64%,2.59% and 3.19%, the kidney is 76.24%, 78.8% and
76.3% respectively, showing that the antibody and its fragments were
eliminated from kidney[51-52]. The half-time of 188Re-
HAb18 F(ab’)2 in the tumor was 32.99h, it was longer in
tumor than that in other organs, this indicated that 188Re-
HAb18 F(ab’)2 was located in tumor, the rate of decay
was low. It also showed that the mAb was specifically combined with
tumor tissues and its harmness to normal tissues was low.
Pharmacokinetic parameters (AUC, blood clearance, half-life, etc)
were generated using the 3P97 software.
From
3P97 software, we can see the pharmacokinecs of conform to a
1-compartment model.Table 3 shows the criteria for goodness of
fitting. we can judge the compartments from R squares, goodness of
fit and AIC.1,1/C,1/C/C represented three weights.To the same
weight,when the F test has marked significance (P<0.05 orP<0.01),we
should choose the compartment of small AIC,and when the F test has
not prominent significance (P>0.05),we should choose the
small compartment.[53] From Table 3, it can be seen that
the 1- compartment model is the best. 188Re-HAb18 F(ab’)2
can distribute to the whole body instantly.The elimination rate was
corresponded to the concentration of the drug. The higher the
concentration was, the higher the speed of elimination was. The
half-time was 32.99h in tumor, being much longer than that in any
other organs.It showed that 188Re- HAb18 F(ab’)2
was located specifically in hepatoma and the elimination was low. It
also showed the higher selective reactivity of HAb18
F(ab’)2 with hepatoma,the harmness to other organs was
small. The half-time was 2.29h in blood, and was 32.99h in tumor,the
radioation of blood can decrease more rapidly than that of the
tumor. The half-time of 188Re was 17h, which was also
lower than that in blood, so the 188Re can be eliminated
through the blood. It has excellent value in the clinical therapy.[54-62]
Carrier-free
188Re is one of β emitting radionuclides recommended
for RAIT because of suitable decay characteristics and availability
from 188W/ 188Re generator. Some methods are
reported in the literature for labeling mAb with 188Re
which imitate the labeling method of 99Tcm. 188Re
eluted from generator will not bind to organic ligands without
reduction to a lower oxidation state. We selected SnCl2
as reductant and GH as transfer ligand and stablizer to avoid Sn- or
Re-collide formation. Table 1 shows that the concentration of SnCl2
and GH solutions is an important parameter to obtain good labeling
results. The low percentage of free 188ReO-4
and radiocolloid shows that 0.8 mol·L-1 GH and 2g·L-1
SnCl2 are the optimal values. Under these conditions, the
labeled HAb18
F(ab’)2 keeps its immunoreactivity (Figure 2).
We
believe that a variety of factors make 188Re a potential
alternative to other β-emitting radionuclides for RAIT. They
include an efficient generator system and the direct labeling of IgG
at high specific activity. The enchanced clearance of 188
Re- IgG from the circulation and the retention of immunoreactivity
and tumortargeting of the Re-mAb conjugate are also important
factors. In addition, the low-energy(155keV,15%)γ emission for
imaging and the lack of accretion of metabolic products in nontarget
tissues are important characteristics for further evaluation of 188Re-labeled
antibodies for tumor therapy.
REFERENCES
1
Guhlke S, Beets AL, Oetjen K, Mirzadeh S, Biersack HJ, Knapp FF Jr.
Simple new method for effective concentration
of 188Re solutions
from alumina-based 188W- 188Re generator. J
Nucl Med 2000; 41: 1271-1278
2 Jeong JM, Lee YJ, Kim YJ, Chang YS, Lee DS,
Chung JK, Song YW, Lee MC. Preparation of rhenium-188-tin colloid as
a
radiation
synovectomy agent and comparison with rhenium-188-sulfur colloid.
Appl Radiat Isot 2000; 52: 851-855
3 Kotzerke J; Glatting G; Seitz U, Rentschler M,
Neumaier B, Bunjes D, Duncker C, Dohr D, Bergmann L, Reske-SN
Radioimmunotherapy
for the intensification of conditioning before stem cell
transplantation: differences in dosimetry
and biokinetics
of 188Re- and 99mTc-labeled anti-NCA-95 mAbs. J Nucl Med
2000; 41: 531-537
4 Sykes TR, Somayaji VV, Bier S, Woo TK, Kwok CS,
Snieckus V, Noujaim AA. Radiolabeling of monoclonal antibody
B43.13 with
rhenium-188 for immunoradiotherapy. Appl Radiat Isot 1997; 48:
899-906
5 Sharkey RM, Blumenthal RD, Behr TM, Wong GY,
Haywood L, Forman D, Griffiths GL, Goldenberg DM. Selection of
radioimmunoconjugates
for the therapy of well-established or micrometastatic colon
carcinoma. Int J Cancer
1997;
72: 477-485
6 Roka R, Sera T,Pajor L, Thurzo L, Lang J,
Csernay L, Pavics L. Clinical experience with rhenium-188 HEDP
therapy for
metastatic
bone pain. Orv Hetil 2000; 141: 1019-1023
7 Wunderlich G, Pinkert J, Andreeff M, Stintz M,
Knapp FF Jr, Kropp J, Franke WG. Preparation and biodistribution
of
rhenium -188
labeled albumin microspheres B 20: a promising new agent for
radiotherapy. Appl Radiat Isot
2000;
52: 63-68
8 Zimmerman BE, Cessna JT, Unterweger MP, Li AN,
Whiting JS, Knapp FF Jr. A new experimental determination of
the
dose
calibrator setting for 188Re. J Nucl Med , 1999;
40: 1508 -1516
9 Knapp FF Jr. Rhenium-188-a generator-derived
radioisotope for cancer therapy. Cancer Biother Radiopharm
1998;
13: 337-349 10 Hafeli UO, Roberts WK, Meier DS, Ciezki JP, Pauer GJ,
Lee EJ, Weinhous MS. Dosimetry of a
W-188/Re-188
beta line source for
endovascular brachytherapy. Med Phys 2000; 27: 668-675
11 Juweid M, Sharkey RM, Swayne LC, Griffiths GL, Dunn R,
Goldenberg DM. Pharmacokinetics, dosimetry and toxicity of
rhenium
-188-labeled anti-carcinoembryonic antigen monoclonal
antibody, MN-14, in gastrointestinal cancer [see
comments].
J Nucl Med 1998; 39: 34-42
12 Junfeng Y, Duanzhi Y, Xiaofeng M, Zili G, Jiong Z, Yongxian
W, Knapp FF Jr. 188Re Rhenium sulfide suspension: a
potential
radiopharmaceutical for tumor treatment following intra-tumor
injection. Nucl Med Biol 1999; 26: 573-579
13 Chen J, Giblin MF, Wang N, Jurisson SS, Quinn TP. In vivo
evaluation of 99mTc/188Re-labeled linear
alpha-melanocyte
stimulating
hormone analogs for specific melanoma targeting. Nucl Med Biol 1999;
26: 687-693
14 Iznaga-Escobar N. 188Re-direct labeling of
monoclonal antibodies for radioimmunotherapy of solid tumors:
biodistribution,
normal organ dosimetry, and toxicology. Nucl Med Biol 1998; 25:
441-447
15 Palmedo H, Guhlke S, Bender H, Sartor J, Schoeneich G,
Risse J, Grunwald F, Knapp FF Jr, Biersack HJ. Dose escalation
study
with rhenium-188 hydroxyethylidene diphosphonate in prostate
cancer patients with osseous metastases.
Eur
J Nucl Med 2000; 27: 123-130
16 Melendez Alafort L, Ferro Flores G, Arteaga Murphy C,
Pedraza Lopez M, Gonzalez Zavala MA, Tendilla JI, Garcia
Salinas
L. Labeling peptides with
rhenium-188. Int J Pharm 1999; 182: 165-172
17 van Zanten Przybysz I, Molthoff CF, Ross JC, Plaizier MA,
Visser GW, Pijpers R, Kenemans P, Verheijen RH.
Radioimmunotherapy
with intravenously administered 131I-labeled chimerical
monoclonal antibody Mov18 in patients
with
ovarian cancer. J Nucl Med
2000;41:1168-1176
18 Behr TM, Behe M, Lohr M, Sgouros G, Angerstein C, Wehrmann
E, Nebendahl K, Becker W. Therapeutic advantages of
Auger
electron-over beta-emitting radiometals radioiodine when conjugated
to internalizing antibodies.
Eur
J Nucl Med 2000;27:753-756
19 Clarke K, Lee FT, Brechbiel MW, Smyth FE, Old LJ, Scott AM.
Therapy efficacy of anti-Lewis(y) humanized
3S193
radioimmunotherapy a breast cancer model: enhanced activity when
combined with taxol chemotherapy.
Clin
Cancer Res 2000;6:3621-3628
20 Barendswaard EC, O’Donoghue JA,Larson SM, Tschmelitsch J,
Welt S, Finn RD, Humm JL. 131I radioimmunotherapy
and
fractionated external beam radiotherapy: comparative effectiveness
in a human tumor xenograft.
J
Nucl Med 1999;40:1764-1768
21 Smith Jones PM, Vallabahajosula S, Goldsmith SJ, Navarro V,
Hunter CJ, Bastidas D, Bander NH. In vitro characterization
of
radiolabeled monoclonal antibodies specific for the extracellular
domain of prostate-specific membrane antigen.
Cancer
Res 2000;60:5237-5243
22 Juweid ME, Zhang CH, Blumenthal RD, Hajjar G, Sharkey RM,
Goldenberg DM. Prediction of hematologic toxicity
after
radioimmunotherapy with 131I-labeled anticarcinoembryonic antigen
monoclonal antibodies. J Nucl Med
1999;40:1609-1616
23 Natowich DJ, Mardirossian G, Ruscowski M, Fogarasi M, Virzi
F, Winnard-Jr P. Directly and indirectly
technetium-99m-labeled
antibodies-a comparison of in vitro and animal in vivo
properties. J Nucl Med
1993;
34: 109-119
24 Colnot DR, Quak JJ, Roos JC, van Lingen A, Wilhelm AJ.
Phase I therapy study of 186Re-labeled chimeric monoclonal
antibody
U36 in patients with squamous
cell carcinoma of the head and neck. J Nucl Med 2000; 41: 1999-2010
25 Lechner P, Lind P, SnyderM, Haushofer H.Probe-guided
surgery for colorectal cancer. Recent Results Cancer Res
2000;
157273-157280
26 Willkomm P, Bender H, Bangard M, Decker P, Grunwald F,
Biersack H J. FDG PET and immunoscintigraphy with
99mTc-labeled
antibody fragments for detection of the recurrence of colorectal
carcinoma. J Nucl Med
2000;
41: 1657-1663
27 Line BR, Weber PB, Lukasiewicz R, Dansereau RN. Reduction
of background activity through radiolabeling of antifibrin
Fab’
with 99mTc-dextran. J Nucl Med 2000; 41: 1264-1270
28 Amato R, Kim EE, Prow D, Andreopoulos D, Kasi LP.
Radioimmunodetection of residual, recurrent or metastatic germ
cell
tumors using technetium-99 anti-(alpha-fetoprotein) Fab’
fragment. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2000; 126: 161-167
29 Bian HJ, Chen ZN and Deng JL. Direct technetium-99m
labeling of anti-hepatoma monoclonal antibody fragment:
a
radioimmunoconjugate for hepatocellular carcinoma imaging. World J
Gastroenterol 2000; 6: 348-352
30 Dadachova E, Chapman J. 188Re(V)-DMSA revisited:
preparation and biodistribution of a potential radiotherapeutic
agent
with low kidney uptake. Nucl Med Commun 1998; 19: 173-181
31 Schmidt PF, Smith SV and Bundesen PG. 188Re
DD-3B6/22 Fab’for use in therapy of ovarian cancer: labeling and
animal
studies.
Nucl Med Biol 1998; 25: 639-649
32 Ferro-Flores G, Pimentel-Gonzalez G, Gonzalez-Zavala MA,
Arteaga de Murphy C,Melendez Alafort L, Tendilla JI,
Croft
BY. Preparation,
biodistribution, and dosimetry of 188Re-labeled McAb ior
ceal and its F(ab’)2 fragments by
avidin-biotin
strategy. Nucl Med Biol 1999; 26: 57-62
33 Thrall JH, Freitas JE, Swanson D, Rogers WL, Clare JM,
Brown M, Pitt B. Clinical comparison of cardiac blood pool
visualization
with technetium-99m red blood cells labeled in vivo and with
technetium-99m human serum albumin.
J
Nucl Med 1978;19: 796-803
34 Qian S B, Li Y, Qian GX, Chen SS. Efficient tumor
regression induced by genetically engineered tumor cells secreting
interleukin-2
and membrane-expressing allogeneic MHC class I antigen. J Cancer Res
Clin Oncol 2001; 127: 27-33
35 Dai WJ, Jiang HC. Advances in gene therapy of liver
cirrhosis: a review. World J Gastroenterol 2001;7:1-8
36 Cheng ML, Wu YY, Huang KF, Luo TY, Ding YS, Lu YY, Liu RC,
Wu J. Clinical study on the treatment of liver fibrosis due
to
hepatitis B by IFN-α1 and traditional medicine
preparation. World J Gastroenterol 1999;5:267-269
37 Kessel D, Caruso JA, Reiners JJ Jr. Potentiation of
photodynamic therapy by ursodeoxycholic acid. Cancer Res
2000;
60: 6985-6988
38 Yang SS, Wu CH, Chen TH, Huang YY, Huang CS. TT viral
infection through blood transfusion: retrospective
investigation
on patients in a prospective study of post transfusion
hepatitis. World J Gastroenterol 2000;6:70-73
39 Kang MA, Kim KY, Seol JY, Kim KC, Nam MJ. The growth
inhibition of hepatoma by gene transfer of antisense vascular
endothelial
growth factor. J Gene Med 2000; 2: 289-296
40 Ma XD, Sui YF, Wang WL. Expression of gap junction genes
connexin 32, connexin 43 and their proteins in
hepatocellular
carcinoma and normal liver tissues. World J Gastroenterol
2000;6:66-69
41 Huang ZH, Zhuang H, Lu S, Guo RH, Xu GM, Cai J, Zhu WF.
Humoral and cellular immunogenecity of DNA vaccine
based
on hepatitis B core gene in rhesus monkeys. World J
Gastroenterol 2001;7:102-106
42 Fang JN, Jin CJ, Cui LH, Quan ZY, Choi BY, Ki MR, Park HB.
A comparative study on serologic profiles of virus hepatitis B.
World
J Gastroenterol 2001;7:107-110
43 Tietze MK, Wuestefeld T, Paul Y, Zender L, Trautwein C,
Manns MP, Kubicka S.IkappaBalpha gene therapy in tumor
necrosis
factor-alpha- and chemotherapy-mediated apoptosis of hepatocellular
carcinomas. Cancer Gene Ther
2000;
7: 1315-1323
44 Xu J, Mei MH, Zeng SE, Shi QF, Liu YM, Qin LL. Expressions
of ICAMa21 and its mRNA in sera and tissues of patients
with
hepatocellular carcinoma. World J Gastroenterol 2001;7:120-125
45 Hu YP, Hu WJ, Zheng WC, Li JX, Dai DS, Wang XM, Zhang SZ,
Yu HY, Sun W, Hao GR. Establishment of transgenic
mouse
harboring hepatitis B virus (adr subtype) genomes. World J
Gastroenterol 2001;7:111-114
46 Qiu K, Wang BF, Chen ZN, Fang P, Liu CG, Wan WX, Liu YF. 99mT
c labeied HAb18 McAb Fab fragment for
radioimmunoimaging
in nude mice bearing human hepatocellular carcinoma. World J
Castroenterol 1998;4:117-120
47 Chen ZN, Bian HJ, Jiang JL. Kecent progress inanti-hepatoma
monoclonal antibody and its application.
Huaren
Xiaohua Zazhi 1998;6:461-462
48 ickman S. Antibodies stage a comeback in cancer treament.
Science 1998;280:1196-1197
49 Safavy A, Khazaeli MB, Safavy K, Mayo MS, Buchsbaum DJ.
Biodistribution study of 188Re-labeled trisuccin-HuCC49
and
trisuccin-HuCC49deltaCh2 conjugates in athymic nude mice bearing
intraperitoneal colon cancer xenografts.
Clin
Cancer Res 1999; 5: 2994-3000
50 Yang LJ, Sui YF, Chen ZN. Preparation and activity of
conjugate of monoclonal antibody HAb18 against hepatoma F(ab’)2
fragment
and staphylococcal enterotoxin A. World J Gastroeterol
2001;7:216-221
51 Duan XD, Chen ZN, Bian HJ, Wen AD, Feng Q. Pharmacokinetics
of technetium-99m labeled anti-hepatoma monoclonal
antibody
HAb18 and it’s F(ab’)2 fragment in mice. Zhongguo
Yaoxue Zazhi 2000;35:465-467
52 Chen H, Gu SF, Xiao Zh, Zeng FD, Wu WZ, Zhang QH.
Pharmacokinetics and bioavailability of sustained release
capsules
of
nicardipine hydrochloride in healthy volunteers. Zhongguo
Yaolixue Tongbao 2000;16:107-110
53 Lan Q,Huang Q, Zhuang DL, Wu YF, Sun ZF.Study on the
pharmacokinetics of immunoradiotherapeutic agent S-MAb
SZ39
in glioma-bearing nude mice. Zhongguo Yaoxue Zazhi
1999;34:683-686
54 Hosono MN, Hosono M, Zamora PO. Localization of colorectal
carcimoma by rhenium-188-labeled B72.3 antibody in
xenograft
mice. Ann Nucl Med 1998; 12:83-88
55 Gestin JF, Loussouarn A, Bardies M, Gautherot E, Gruaz
Guyon A, Sai Maurel C, Barbet J, Curtet C, Chatal J F, Faivre
Chauvet
A. Two-step targeting of xenografted colon carcinoma using a
bispecific antibody and 188Re-labeled bivalent
hapten:
biodistribution and dosimetry studies. J Nucl Med 2001; 42:
146-153
56 Hosono M N, Hosono M, Mishra AK, Faivre Chauvet A,
Gautherot E, Barbet J, Knapp F F, Chatal JF. Rhenium-188-
labeled
anti-neural cell adhesion molecule antibodies with
2-iminothiolane modification for targeting small-cell lung
cancer.
Ann Nucl Med 2000; 14: 173-179
57 Bian HJ, Chen ZN, Lou C, Mi L,Wang J, Yue XL. 188Re-labeled
HAb18 F(ab’)2 of hepatoma radioimmunoimaging.
Zhongliu
2000; 20:181-183
58 Qingnuan L, Xiaodong Z, Rong S, Wenxin L. Preparation of (188Re)
Re-AEDP and its biodistribution studies. Appl Radiat
Isot
2000; 53: 993-997
59 Kostarelos K, Emfietzoglou D. Tissue dosimetry of liposome-radionuclide
complexes for internal radiotherapy:
toward
liposome-targeted therapeutic radiopharmaceuticals. Anticancer Res
2000; 20: 3339-3345
60 Iznaga Escobar N, Torres LA, Morales A, Ramos M, Alvarez I,
Perez N, Fraxedas R, Rodriguez O, Rodriguez N, Perez R,
Lage
A, Stabin MG.
Technetium-99m-labeled anti-EGF-receptor antibody in patients with
tumor of epithelial origin: I.
Biodistribution
and dosimetry for radioimmunotherapy. J Nucl Med 1998; 39: 15-23
61 Blower PJ, Kettle AG, O’Doherty MJ, Coakley AJ, Knapp FF.
99mTc(V)DMSA quantitatively predicts 188Re(V)DMSA
distribution
in patients with prostate cancer metastatic to bone. Eur J
Nucl Med 2000; 27: 1405-1409
62 Heppeler A, Froidevaux S, Eberle AN, Maecke HR. Receptor
targeting for tumor localisation and therapy with
radiopeptides.
Curr Med Chem 2000; 7: 971-994
| |