|
Jing
Jin, Jian-Ying Yang, Jing Liu, Yu-Ying Kong, Yuan Wang, Guang-Di Li,
Institute
of Biochemistry and Cell Biology, Shanghai Institutes for Biological
Sciences, Chinese Academy of Science, Shanghai 200031, China
Supported by the National High-Technology Program of China,
No. 863-102-07-02-02
Correspondence to: Yuan Wang and Guang-Di Li, Institute of
Biochemistry and Cell Biology, Shanghai Institutes for Biological
Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 320 Yue-Yang Road, Shanghai
200031, China. wangyuan@server.shcnc.ac.cn
Telephone: +86-21-64374430 Ext 5326 Fax: +86-21-64338357
Received 2001-12-05 Accepted 2002-01-23
Abstract
AIM: Both Hepatitis B virus (HBV) and Hepatitis C virus (HCV)
are major causative agents of transfusion-associated and
community-acquired hepatitis worldwide. Development of a HCV vaccine
as well as more effective HBV vaccines is an urgent task. DNA
immunization provides a promising approach to elicit protective
humoral and cellular immune responses against viral infection. The
aim of this study is to achieve immune responses against both HCV
and HBV by DNA immunization with fusion constructs comprising
various HCV E2 gene fragments fused to HBsAg gene of HBV.
METHODS: C57BL/6 mice were immunized with plasmid DNA
expressing five fragments of HCV E2 fused to the gene for HBsAg
respectively. After one primary and one boosting immunizations,
antibodies against HCV E2 and HBsAg were tested and subtyped in
ELISA. Splenic cytokine expression of IFN-γ and IL-10 was
analyzed using an RT-PCR assay. Post-immune mouse antisera also were
tested for their ability to capture HCV viruses in the serum of a
hepatitis C patient in vitro.
RESULTS: After immunization, antibodies against both HBsAg
and HCV E2 were detected in mouse sera, with IgG2a being the
dominant immunoglobulin sub-class. High-level expression of INF-γ
was detected in cultured splenic cells. Mouse antisera against three
of the five fusion constructs were able to capture HCV viruses in an
in vitro assay.
CONCLUSION: The results indicate that these fusion constructs
could efficiently elicit humoral and Th1 dominant cellular immune
responses against both HBV S and HCV E2 antigens in DNA-immunized
mice. They thus could serve as candidates for a bivalent vaccine
against HBV and HCV infection. In addition, the capacity of mouse
antisera against three of the five fusion constructs to capture HCV
viruses in vitro suggested that neutralizing epitopes may be present
in other regions of E2 besides the hypervariable region 1.
Jin J, Yang JY, Liu J, Kong YY, Wang Y, Li GD. DNA immunization with
fusion genes encoding different regions of hepatitis C virus E2
fused to the gene for hepatitis B surface antigen elicits immune
responses to both HCV and HBV. World J Gastroenterol
2002;8(3):505-510
INTRODUCTION
Both Hepatitis B virus (HBV) and Hepatitis C virus (HCV) are
major causative agents of transfusion-associated and
community-acquired hepatitis worldwide[1,2]. It is
estimated that there are 250 million HBV carriers in the world and
more than 10% of chronically infected HBV patients eventually
develop cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma[3]. About
2-3% of the world population are HCV carriers. More than 70% of HCV
infections become chronic, among which 5-20% progress to liver
cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma[4,5]. Available
HBV vaccines have proven to be safe and effective in preventing HBV
infection. However, high costs, exclusion of some escape mutants and
neonatal intolerance are elimilating their wide use[6].
So far, no vaccine is available against HCV infection. IFN-α
treatment is the only useful therapy available. However, only 20-30%
of treated patients develop long-term responses[7].
Therefore, HBV and HCV infections pose a worldwide health threat and
the development of uniformly effective vaccines of affordable prices
is an urgent task.
DNA
immunization, which allows the de novo synthesis of antigens in
host's cells, is able to elicit protective humoral and cellular
immune responses in several animal models of viral infection[8-10].
The cellular context for de novo synthesized proteins to achieve
proper maturation is a particularly important advantage for proteins
such as those constituting viral envelopes whose maturation requires
the help of additional cellular factors. Increasing data showed that
DNA immunization against HBsAg elicited strong humoral and cellular
immune responses that protect chimpanzees against the challenge with
HBV. Moreover, DNA immunization in transgenic mice expressing HBsAg
in the liver resulted in the clearance of HBsAg and long-term
control of transgene expression, suggesting that DNA immunization is
a potential tool in the treatment of HBV chronic carriers[11-15].
DNA immunization with HCV E2 protein that was believed to carry the
major neutralization epitopes of HCV[16] also was studied
in several animal models including primates[17-21]. These
studies demonstrated that DNA immunization with HCV E2 elicited
strong humoral and cellular immune responses in various animals,
though it did not elicit sterilizing immunity in chimpanzees against
the challenge with a monoclonal homologous virus. The DNA
immunization did appear to modify the infection and might have
prevented the progression to chronicity, suggesting that DNA vaccine
could be a promising approach for HCV treatment.
The
objective of this research was to simultaneously stimulate immune
responses against both HBV and HCV by DNA immunization with fusion
constructs comprising of various HCV E2 gene fragments fused to the
HBsAg gene of HBV. HBsAg carries all the information required for
membrane translocation, particle assembly and secretion from
mammalian cells. We have previously shown that HBsAg carrying HBV
preS1 (21-47) at its truncated carboxyl terminal end could present
the preS1 epitope on the surface of the chimeric particle and induce
preS1 specific antibodies in mice[22-24]. Moreover,
humoral and cellular immune responses were successfully induced via
direct injection of the plasmid containing the HBsAg-preS1 fusion
gene[15]. These data indicated that gene fragments of
proper size could be fused to the C-terminal of HBsAg without
affecting particle assembly and secretion, and were capable of
inducing immune responses against both HBsAg and the fused epitope.
Although the epitopes on envelope protein E2 are not very clear yet,
there have been some successful experiments to determine the immune
determinants[25-27]. Based on these previous findings,
five fragments of HCV-E2 were selected in the hydrophilic region of
E2 protein and fused to the truncated 3' end of HBsAg gene. The
humoral and cellular immune responses of the plasmids expressing
fusion proteins were evaluated. Furthermore, virus-capture ability
of antibodies against those HCV-E2 fragments was also examined. The
results are opening a new approach to the development of a bivalent
vaccine against HBV and HCV, and lead to a better understanding of
the immunological property of HCV-E2.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Expression plasmids
Five HCV E2 gene fragments (A to E) were amplified from
pUC18/E (E1-E2 gene of HCV genome type 1b inserted in pUC18)[28]
with following primers:
Fragment
Sense
PrimerAntisense Primer
A(384-413) P1 CGGCGTTGTATACAACACCTACG
P2 TGGGAATTCAAAGCTGGATTTTCT
B(414-443) P3 GAAAATCGTATACGTGAACACCA
P4 CCGAATTCAGTAGAACAGCGCG
C(460-489) P5 CATGGCCGTATACCGCTCCATTG
P6 GTCGAATTCAGTAGTGCCAGCA
D(490-519) P7 TTGCTGGGTATACCCACCTCGA
P8 GAGAATTCAGGTCGTCCCCACCAC
E(529-549) P9 GGTGGGGGTATACGATCGCCTC
P10 TACGAATTCACCAGTTGCCTTGCGG
AccI
and EcoRI sites were introduced in sense and antisense primers,
respectively. After digestion with AccI and EcoRI, PCR products were
inserted downstream from the HBV S gene in pcDNA3S[29] to
obtain pcDNA3SE2-A, pcDNA3SE2-B, pcDNA3SE2-C, pcDNA3SE2-D and
pcDNA3SE2-E (Figure 1). A fragment coding for amino acids 384 to 649
of HCV-E2 was also amplified from pUC18/E with primers P11
(5'-CCGGCGGATCCATGAACACC-3') and P12 (5'-GCGAATTCATCCTCGAGTCCAG-3').
PcDNA3E2 was constructed by inserting this PCR product digested with
BamHI and EcoRI into the MCS of pcDNA3 (Figure 1).
Figure 1(PDF)Schematic
diagram of the expression plasmids.The coordinates below the bars
refer to the corresponding amino acid residues of HBV surface
antigen (HBsAg) and HCV E2 protein. The fusion genes were under the
control of CMV immediate early promoter in pcDNA3. Bovine growth
hormone (bGH) 3'-untranslated sequences were used as polyadenylation
signals.
ELISA for transiently expressed HBV surface antigen
COS-M6 cells were maintained in Dulbecco's Modified Eagle's
medium (DMEM) supplemented with 5% fetal calf serum (Gibco, BRL,
USA). 10μg of plasmid DNA and 5μg of an internal control
pSK110, which expresses β-galactosidase, were transfected into
5×10 5 COS-M6 cells by calcium phosphate co-precipitation method.
Forty-eight hours after transfection, cells and media were
collected. The activity of β-galactosidase in cell lysate
obtained by cycles of freezing and thawing was analyzed to normalize
the variation of transfection efficiency among different samples.
HBsAg in cell lysates and media was determined with a commercial
ELISA kit (Sino-American Co., Shanghai, China). The kit was adapted
for quantitative measurements of HBsAg using purified yeast derived
HBsAg (National Vaccine and Serum Institute, Beijing, China) as
potency standard. Results were presented as means of three
independent experiments[23,30].
Western Blotting of transiently expressed products
HeLa cells were maintained in DMEM supplemented with 5%
fetal calf serum. To enhance the expression level of fusion genes,
cells were first infected with vaccinia virus vTT7 that expresses T7
RNA polymerase at a M.O.I. of 10 pfu per cell[31]. Two
hours post-infection, 1-2×105 cells were transfected
with 10μg of plasmid DNA by calcium phosphate method. Eighteen
hours after transfection, cells were collected and cell lysate was
electrophoresed on a 12.5% SDS-PAGE and subsequently electro-blotted
onto nitrocellulose membrane. After blocking for 1h with 5% powdered
lipid-free milk in PBST (PBS containing 0.1% Tween 20), the membrane
was incubated with anti-HBs McAb H116 (kindly provided by Dr. E.
Hildt, Munich, Germany) or anti-HCV E2 (450-565) polyclonal
antiserum RE2-116[32], followed by incubation with HRP
conjugated secondary antibody (Dako Co., Denmark). Signals were
detected by enhanced chemi-luminescence (ECL) blotting analysis
system (Amersham-Pharmacia Co., UK).
DNA immunization of mice
C57BL/6 (H-2 b) mice were purchased from Shanghai Laboratory
Animal Center. Groups of five female mice, 6-8 weeks old, were
injected with 100μg of expression plasmids into regenerated
tibialis anterior (TA) muscles 5 days after treatment of 100μl
10-5mol/l cardiotoxin (Sigma, USA)[15,29].
Four weeks later, the mice were boosted in the same way.
Serologic tests
Sera were collected by tail bleeding at different time
points pre-and post-injection and assayed for anti-HBs and
anti-HCV-E2 by ELISA. Microwell plates were coated with serum
derived HBsAg particles[29] (Kehua Co., Shanghai, China),
or 0.1μg/well HCV-E2 (385-565) expressed in E. Coli[32].
After blocking with 5% powdered lipid-free milk in PBST (PBS
containing 0.1% Tween 20), serial two-fold dilutions of sera were
added. The bound antibodies were detected with HRP-conjugated rabbit
anti-mouse IgG (1:1000) (Dako Co., Denmark) after extensive washing
with PBST. Sera from mice immunized with pcDNA3 vector at 1 in 20
dilution were used as negative controls. A positive result was
defined as an absorbance value of great than twice the absorbance of
negative control with a cutoff of 0.050. Seroconversion was defined
as giving a positive reading at 1:20 dilution. Antibody titres of
pooled seroconverted animal sera were set as the highest dilution
giving a positive reading (end-point dilution method)[22,32].
To
type the subclasses of IgG, mouse sera of each group were collected
6 weeks after the first immunization, and the titers of IgG1 and
IgG2a antibodies assayed individually by a similar end-point
dilution method, using the HRP-conjugated rabbit anti-mouse IgG1 and
IgG2a (Serotec Co., Oxford, UK) for detection.
Splenic cytokine expression test
Expression of IFN-γ and IL-10 were assayed
semi-quantitatively as described[33,34]. Mice were killed
10 weeks after the first injection and spleens were removed
aseptically. The single cell suspensions of the splenocytes were
prepared and maintained in DMEM supplemented with 5% fetal calf
serum and 5×10-5 M β-ME at a density of 107
cells per well. Cells were stimulated with 0.5μg/ml rDNA yeast
derived HBsAg (National Vaccine and Serum Institute, Beijing,
China), followed by culture at 37℃.
At 0, 24, 48 hr post-stimulation, splenic cells were sampled. Total
RNA was extracted with Trizol (Gibcol, BRL, USA) and reverse
transcribed with random hexamer primers (New England Biolabs Inc,
Beverly, USA.). Messenger RNAs for IFN-γ and IL-10 were semi-quantitated
by competitive RT-PCR[33,34]. Splenic cells from mice
immunized with pcDNA3 and mitogen ConA (5μg/ml) served as a
negative and a positive control respectively.
Analysis of the virus capture capability of immune sera
The virus capture capability of antibodies in immune sera
was assessed according to the method of affinity capture RT-PCR (AC-RT-PCR)
detection of HEV in patient stool specimens[35] with a
few modifications. Briefly, 0.5ml microcentrifuge tubes were coated
with 50μl goat anti-mouse IgG F(ab') 2 (0.02μg/μl,
Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories, Inc., West Grove, USA), capped
and incubated at room temperature for 1hr. After blocking with 5%
powdered lipid-free milk in PBST for 15 min at 37℃
and overnight at 4℃,
tubes were aspirated and washed with 150μl PBST. The mouse sera
were adjusted to same titre of 1:80 by dilution with PBS, to avoid
the variations of the results caused by different antibody titers in
different samples. Tubes were subsequently loaded with 25μl
properly diluted mouse immune sera and 25μl
HCV-RNA-PCR-positive patient's serum (1.6×107 HCV genome
Equivalent [Geq] per ml, provided by Dr. X. Zhang, Ruijin Hospital,
Shanghai, China) diluted 1:50 in PBS. The mixtures were mixed gently
and incubated for 1 hr at room temperature and overnight at 4℃.
Tubes were then washed three times with 150μl wash buffer (25
mM Tris-HCl pH8.0, 75mM KCl, 2.5mM MgCl2). Captured virus
was detected with a commercial HCV PCR testing kit (Sino-American
Co., Shanghai, China) which specifically amplifies a 225 bp fragment
in the 5' UTR of HCV RNA. HCV which was captured directly by a
conformation specific monoclonal antibody (McAb) against HCV-E2,
219A2, (kindly provided by Dr. S. Abrignani, IRIS, Siena, Italy) was
used as positive control.
RESULTS
Transient expression of HBsAg-HCV E2 fusion proteinsFive
expression plasmids containing the HCV-E2 coding sequences
(corresponding to amino acids 384-413, 414-443, 460-489, 490-519,
529-549) fused to the 3' end of HBV-S gene were constructed as
described in “Materials and Methods”. COS-M6 cells were then
transfected with these plasmids respectively.
Forty-eight
hours post-transfection, the presence of HBsAg fusion protein in the
cell lysates and culture media was measured with HBsAg ELISA. HBsAg
was detected in both the cell lysates and culture media, indicating
that the fusion constructs were able to express and secrete HBsAg
efficiently (Figure 2).
Expressed
HBsAg and HCV-E2 fusion proteins were also evaluated by Western
Blot. They were separated by SDS-PAGE gel, followed by incubation
with HBsAg specific McAb H116 (Figure 3A). Compared with HBsAg
expressed by pcDNA3S (Figure 1), which contained the major surface
gene of HBV only and displayed 24000 and 27000 protein bands for the
unglycosylated and glycosylated forms respectively (Figure 3A,
lane1)[29], all the fusion antigens showed slower
migratory bands (27000 and 29000), indicating successful expression
of the fusion proteins. Two fusion constructs SE2-B (414-443) and
SE2-D (490-519) displayed additional bands at 31000, which might
result from multi-glycosylation. Expressed fusion proteins SE2-C
(460-489),
SE2-D (490-519) and SE2-E (529-549) were also incubated with
polyclonal antibody RE2-116. The band pattern in the Western Blots
(Figure 3B) was consistent with that in Figure 3A, suggesting that
these fusion proteins possess both HBV-S and HCV-E2 antigenicity.
SE2-A(384-413) and SE2-B(414-443) were not assayed for HCV-E2, since
they did not locate in the reactive region (450-565) of RE2-116. By
contrast, the non-fused truncated E2(384-649) (Figure 1) displayed
only a single band as large as the expected unglycosylated product
(Figure 3B, lane 1).
Figure 2(PDF)Comparison
of the expression and secretion level of fusion proteins in COS
cells.
pcDNA3SE2-A, pcDNA3SE2-B, pcDNA3SE2-C, pcDNA3SE2-D, pcDNA3SE2-E are
the plasmids expressing HBsAg fused with different HCV E2 fragments.
The HBsAg in the culture medium (gray) and cell lysates (black) was
measured by a commercial ELISA kit (Sino-American Co., Shanghai,
China). Results were presented as means of three independent
experiments (see Materials and Methods). The amount of HBsAg
expressed by pcDNA3SE2-D in cell lysates was arbitrarily taken as
1.0.
Figure 3(PDF)Characterization
of the fusion antigens transiently expressed in HeLa cells by
Western blotting.
After separation by a 12.5% SDS-PAGE, the proteins were blotted onto
a nitrocellulose membrane and incubated with (A)
anti-S McAb (H166, 1:300 diluted), (B)
anti-HCV E2 (450-565) polyclonal antiserum RE2-116 (1:500 diluted)
respectively. (A) lane 1-7, fusion proteins expressed by pcDNA3,
pcDNA3S, pcDNA3SE2-A, pcDNA3SE2-B, pcDNA3SE2-C, pcDNA3SE2-D and
pcDNA3SE2-E respectively. (B) lane 1-5, fusion proteins expressed by
pcDNA3E2- pcDNA3, pcDNA3SE2-C, pcDNA3SE2-D, pcDNA3SE2-E
respectively.
Humoral responses to fusion antigens in DNA-immunized mice
C57BL/6 mice were injected with HCV-E2 and HBV-S fusion
constructs. As shown in Table 1, the immunized mice produced
antibodies against both HBsAg and HCV-E2 after the first injection,
and the seroconversion rate increased quickly after the boost,
reaching 100% at week 6 or 8. Antibodies were still detectable after
24 weeks. Impressively, the anti-HCV E2 antibody titers elicited in
mice immunized with fusion constructs were much higher than that
induced in mice injected with pcDNA3E2 (up to 40 fold difference),
which contained non-fused HCV E2(384-649). Compared with the humoral
response induced by pcDNA3S, all the fusion constructs were able to
induce equivalent or slightly smaller anti-HBs antibody responses.
Subsets
of IgG against both HBsAg and HCV-E2 were also determined. The IgG
profiles specific to HBsAg indicated the obvious predominance of
IgG2a (Figure 4A), while IgG profiles specific to HCV-E2 varied
among different constructs (Figure 4B). Only pcDNA3SE2-A and
pcDNA3SE2-D induced predominant IgG2a against HCV-E2, suggesting
that the T helper responses elicited against these two fragments
were Th1 dominant.
Figure 4(PDF)IgG
subtypes profile of antibodies against HBsAg and HCV E2.Sera
collected from mice 6 weeks after boosting were assayed for the IgG1
and IgG2a antibodies against HBsAg and HCV E2. For each group of 5
mice, titers of IgG1 and IgG2a antibodies were determined
individually by serial two-fold dilution titration methods using HRP-conjugated
rabbit anti-mouse IgG1 and IgG2a (Serotec Co., Oxford, UK) for
detection. (as described in Materials and Methods). The arithmetic
mean ± standard deviation (SD) (n=5) is shown. (A) Anti-HBs,
(B) Anti-HCV E2.
Expression of cytokines in the cultured splenic cells from
DNA-immunized mice
After the in vitro stimulation of splenic cells derived from
immunized mice, expressions of cytokines were analyzed by
competitive RT-PCR. 24 hrs post-stimulation with rDNA yeast derived
HBsAg (National Vaccine and Serum Institute, Beijing, China), high
levels of IFN-γ were detected in the splenic cells from the
mice immunized with pcDNA3SE2-A, pcDNA3SE2-B, pcDNA3SE2-C and
pcDNA3SE2-E (Figure 5). The IL-10 expression was also detectable,
but weaker than IFN-γ expression.
Table 1A Sero-conversion Ratios and Titres of Anti-HBsAg in
DNA Immunized Mice
|
Weeks
|
DNA
Immunogen
|
|
pcDNA3S
|
pcDNA3SE2-A
|
pcDNA3SE2-B
|
pcDNA3SE2-C
|
pcDNA3SE2-D
|
pcDNA3SE2-E
|
|
0a
|
(0/5)
|
(0/5)
|
(0/5)
|
(0/5)
|
(0/5)
|
(0/5)
|
|
2
|
(5/5)
|
(1/5)
|
(1/5)
|
(1/5)
|
(1/5)
|
(2/5)
|
|
4b
|
1280
d(5/5 c)
|
1280(4/5)
|
640(2/5)
|
320(2/5)
|
320(2/5)
|
320(4/5)
|
|
6
|
10240(5/5)
|
10240(5/5)
|
5120(4/5)
|
5120(4/5)
|
5120(5/5)
|
2560(5/5)
|
|
8
|
5120(5/5)
|
5120(5/5)
|
5120(5/5)
|
5120(5/5)
|
5120(5/5)
|
5120(5/5)
|
|
10
|
5120(5/5)
|
5120(5/5)
|
2560(4/5)
|
2560(5/5)
|
2560(5/5)
|
5120(5/5)
|
|
16
|
1280(5/5)
|
1280(5/5)
|
640(4/5)
|
320(5/5)
|
640(5/5)
|
80(5/5)
|
|
24
|
1280(5/5)
|
1280(5/5)
|
640(4/5)
|
320(5/5)
|
640(5/5)
|
80(5/5)
|
Note:
Groups of mice (n=5) were injected i.m. with the respective
plasmids, and anti-HBsAg antibody titers were measured at different
time points by ELISA. Sera from mice immunized with pcDNA3 vector
were used as negative controls and showed no reactivity with any
coated antigens (data not shown). For sero-conversion, 1:20 starting
dilution were assayed and the sera giving positive reading were
taken as converted one. To determine antibody titers, serial
two-fold dilutions of pooled seroconverted immune sera were
incubated in antigen-coated wells. A positive result was defined as
an absorbance value of greater than twice the absorbance of the
negative control with a cutoff of 0.050(also see Materials and
Methods). At week 2 only sero-conversion testing was performed at
1:20 dilution. a the first immunization; b the
second immunization (boost); c (n/n); sero-conversion
ratio, numbers of sero-converted mice relative to the total number
tested; d titer; reciprocal of the two-fold dilution
factor at end point; pools of seroconverted sera from test groups
were tested.
Table 1B Sero-conversion Ratios and Titres of Anti-HCV-E2 in
DNA Immunized Mice
|
Weeks
|
DNA
Immunogen
|
|
pcDNA3S
|
pcDNA3SE2-A
|
pcDNA3SE2-B
|
pcDNA3SE2-C
|
pcDNA3SE2-D
|
pcDNA3SE2-E
|
|
0a
|
(0/5)
|
(0/5)
|
(0/5)
|
(0/5)
|
(0/5)
|
(0/5)
|
|
2
|
(1/5)
|
(2/5)
|
(1/5)
|
(1/5)
|
(1/5)
|
(1/5)
|
|
4b
|
40d(2/5c)
|
320(3/5)
|
160(1/5)
|
320(3/5)
|
320(2/5)
|
320(1/5)
|
|
6
|
160(5/5)
|
640(5/5)
|
640(5/5)
|
2560(5/5)
|
2560(5/5)
|
5120(4/5)
|
|
8
|
880(5/5)
|
640(5/5)
|
320(5/5)
|
5120(5/5)
|
5120(5/5)
|
5120(4/5)
|
|
10
|
80(5/5)
|
160(5/5)
|
320(5/5)
|
5120(5/5)
|
5120(5/5)
|
5120(4/5)
|
|
16
|
80(5/5)
|
80(5/5)
|
160(5/5)
|
160(5/5)
|
320(5/5)
|
80(4/5)
|
|
24
|
40(5/5)
|
40(5/5)
|
80(5/5)
|
80(5/5)
|
160(5/5)
|
40(4/5)
|
Note:
Groups of mice (n=5) were injected i.m. with the respective
plasmids, and seroconversion ratio and anti-HCV E2 antibody titers
were measured at different time points by ELISA. With the exception
of coating antigen (E2(385-565)), all experimental procedures were
the same as described in Table 1A. a the first
immunization; b the second immunization (boost); c
(n/n); sero-conversion ratio, numbers of sero-converted mice
relative to the total number tested; d titer; reciprocal
of the two-fold dilution factor at end point, pools of positive sera
from test groups were tested.
Virus-capture ability of antisera from DNA-immunized mice
To test the virus-capture capability of antibodies elicited
in response to DNA immunization, affinity-capture-RT-PCR (AC-RT-PCR)
was performed as described in “Materials and Methods”. The HCV
virions bound to anti-HCV-E2 were detected by nested RT-PCR to
amplify a specific fragment in the 5'-UTR of HCV genome. The results
indicated that immune sera of mice immunized with pcDNA3SE2-A,
pcDNA3SE2-B and pcDNA3SE2-D were able to capture HCV virions in the
serum of a hepatitis C patient in vitro (Figure 6).
Figure 5 IFN-γ
and IL-10 mRNA expression.
mRNA was isolated from splenic cells of immunized mice after
stimulation with HBsAg for 0, 24, 48 hours. IFN-γ and IL-10
mRNA expression was determined by semi-quantitative RT-PCR after
standardization of the cDNA concentration by amplification of HPRT.
Level of expression is indicated as ratio of target to competitor,
calculated from densitometric analysis of their PCR products. (High
ratio indicates high expression of target mRNA).
Figure 6 Detection
of HCV captured by mouse antisera by nested RT-PCR. After immuno-capture
of HCV from hepatitis C patient serum (1.6×107 HCV GEq
per ml) by antisera from groups of mice immunized with pcDNA3,
pcDNA3SE2-A, pcDNA3SE2-B, pcDNA3SE2-C, pcDNA3SE2-D and pcDNA3SE2-E
(lane 1 to lane 6), viruses were detect1ed by nested RT-PCR using
the HCV RT-PCR testing kit (Sino-America Co., Shanghai, China). Lane
7, the positive control using McAb against HCV E2 to capture HCV.
Lane M, molecular markers.
DISCUSSION
In this report, five fusion constructs comprising various
fragments within the hydrophilic region of HCV-E2 fused to the 3'
end of the S gene of HBV were constructed. The immune responses of
mice to immunization with these fusion construct s indicated that
all five constructs were able to elicit strong antibody responses
against both HBsAg and HCV-E2. Importantly, antibody typing showed
the HBsAg specific Th1 like responses, which were consistent with
the high levels of IFN-γ expression in cultured spleen cells
from the immunized mice after stimulation with HBsAg. The IgG
subtype responses to HCV-E2 also showed E2 specific Th1 like
responses to E2-A and E2-D. Since Th1 like response is essential for
triggering a wide range of cellular responses against infectious
agents, including NK cell responses, CTL responses and inflammatory
reactions, the results of the DNA immunization with our fusion
plasmids suggest a promising strategy to clear both HBV and HCV in
the host.
The
excellent vaccine potential of our constructs may be ascribed to the
use of HBsAg as a carrier. HBsAg has the advantage of assembling
into large secretable particles, which form a virus-like polymeric
structure that enhances antigenic stability and provides a
high-density presentation to antigen-presenting cells (APC). HBsAg
has been used successfully as vaccine carrier to present various
antigens[15,23,29,36,37]. The successful immune responses
to both HBV S and HCV E2 in these reports support our prelimilary
observation that antigens of a proper size fused to C-terminal of
HBsAg could be successfully presented without affecting the
immunogenicity of HBsAg. Moreover, our fusion constructs were able
to elicit higher levels of antibody responses to HCV E2, compared to
pcDNA3E2 that encodes only a truncated HCV-E2 (384-649). This of
course suggests that fusion to HBsAg may help these fragments to be
presented more effectively to APCs, and hence induce stronger
humoral responses against HCV-E2. These fusion constructs may turn
out to be promising candidates for the vaccines against HCV and HBV.
It
is well established that the intact E2 glycoproteins expressed alone
or together with E1 (E1-E2 heterodimer) are retained in the
endoplasmic reticulum[38] and that E2 proteins expressed
in mammalian cells without the signal sequence at the C-terminus of
E1 are not glycosylated[39]. Consistently, we also
observed that the truncated E2(384-649) was expressed in
unglycosylated form in mammalian cells. However, the use of HBsAg as
carrier seems to give rise to expression of fusion proteins carrying
HCV-E2 epitopes in glycosylated and secretable form, which
emphasizes the advantage of HBsAg as a carrier. Notably, two
products, SE2-B and SE2-D expressed by pcDNA2SE2-B and pcDNA3SE2-D,
produced an additional 31000 glycosylated form, suggesting that in
addition to the glycosylation site in HBsAg, some sites in fragment
B and D also may be glycosylated. Since glycosylation is a decisive
factor for biological molecules to carry out correct biological
functions, the additional glycosylation of the fusion constructs may
elicit immune responses similar to that of natural infections by the
HCV. This may be an additional reason that our constructs are able
to elicit strong immune responses.
The
results presented here also suggest that the DNA immunization with
different HCV E2 fragments fused to HBsAg may be a useful approach
to screen for epitopes or immune determinants on HCV-E2. Nakano et
al[18] inserted different regions of HCV E2 into the
preS2 region of HBV surface protein, and evaluated the humoral
immune responses of these fusion constructs via DNA immunization.
Their study also suggest that fusion constructs of E2 with HBsAg
might be an efficient way to identify restricted immunogenic domains
within E2. In our study, each of the chosen E2 fragments contained
only 30 amino acids, it provides a possibility to study the
antigenic domains of HCV E2 more precisely. Antibody responses and
IgG subtype typing against these E2 fragments suggest that B- and T-
epitopes were present in fragment D(490-519). Furthermore, the
results of virus-capture assay showed that HCV virions in the serum
of a hepatitis C patient could be captured by immune sera against
SE2-A, SE2-B and SE2-D in vitro. In particular, antibodies against
fragment D exhibited the strongest ability to capture HCV virions.
Because the ability of antibodies to bind viruses is a prerequisite
for neutralizing viruses in vivo and preventing bodies from being
infected, our data suggest that besides HVR1-containing fragment A,
fragments B and D probably also harbour neutralizing epitopes. So
far, only HVR1 has been confirmed to be an important epitope[40-48]
whose corresponding antibody can neutralize the binding of HCV-E2 to
susceptible cells in vitro, and prevent HCV infection after in vitro
neutralization[42,43]. Recently, correlation between
circulating antibodies against HVR1 and resolution of chronic
hepatitis C has been confirmed[49]. However, the high
variability of HVR1 interferes with the development of HVR1-based
vaccines. Some researchers suggested that there may be B-cell
epitopes located downstream from HVR1[17,18,50]. Rosa et
al[43] speculated that there may be at least one
additional neutralizing epitope located somewhere other than HVR1 of
HCV E2, this was based on the finding that HVR-1 peptide failed to
completely block the binding of HCV to susceptible cells. Our
results suggest that potential neutralizing epitopes may be present
within fragments B (414-443) and D (490-519) that are downstream
from HVR1. Since fragments B and D are relatively more conservative
than HVR1, it would seem that vaccines containing fragments B and/or
D may be more promising than that containing only HVR1. Further
studies on these neutralizing epitopes are under way, which
hopefully will lead to a better understanding of the immunological
property of HCV E2, and facilitate the design of efficient HCV
vaccines.
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
The authors are grateful to Dr. E. Hildt for providing
monoclonal antibody (McAb) H166, Dr. S. Abrignani for McAb 219A2,
Dr. Yuan ZH for HRP-Rabbit antibody against mouse IgG1 and IgG2a,
Dr. Zhang XX for HCV patient serum and Qu D for her help in cytokine
test.
EFERENCES
1 Choo
QL, Kuo G, Weiner AJ, Overby LR, Bradley DW, Houghton M. Isolation
of a cDNA clone derived from a blood-
borne
non-A, non-B viral hepatitis genome. Science 1989;244:359-362
2 Kuo G,
Choo QL, Alter HJ, Gitnick GL, Redeker AG, Purcell RH, Miyamura T,
Dienstag JL, Alter MJ, Stevens CE. An assay
for
circulating antibodies to a major etiologic virus of human non-A,
non-B hepatitis. Science 1989;244:362-364
3 Tiollais
P, Buendia MA. Hepatitis B virus. Sci Am 1991;264:48-54
4 Alter MJ,
Margolis HS, Krawczynski K, Judson FN, Mares A, Alexander WJ, Hu PY,
Miller JK, Gerber MA, Sampliner RE.
The
natural history of community-acquired hepatitis C in the United
States: the Sentinel Counties chronic non-A, non-B
hepatitis
study team. N Engl J Med 1992;327:1899-1905
5 Saito I,
Miyamura T, Ohbayashi A, Harada H, Katayama T, Kikuchi S, Watanabe
Y, Koi S, Onji M, Ohta Y. Hepatitis C
virus
infection is associated with the development of hepatocellular
carcinoma. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1990;87:
6547-6549
6
Thanavala
Y. Novel approaches to vaccine development against HBV. J Biotechnol
1996;44:67-73
7
Fried MW,
Sambrook J. Therapy of hepatitis C. Semin Liver Dis 1995;15:82-91
8 Wayne CL,
Michael B. DNA Vaccine. Crit Rev Immunol 1998;18:449-484
9 Donnelly
JJ, Ulmer JB, Liu MA. Immunization with DNA. J Immunol Meth
1994;176:145-152
10
McDonnel WM, Askari FK.
DNA Vaccines. N Engl J Med 1996;334:42-45
11 Davis HL, Michel ML,
Whalen RG. DNA-based immunization induces continuous secretion of
hepatitis B surface antigen
and
high levels of circulating antibody. Human Mol Genetics
1993;2:1847-1851
12 Michel ML, Davis HL,
Schleef M, Mancini M, Tiollais P, Whalen RG. DNA-mediated
immunization to the hepatitis B
surface
antigen in mice: Aspects of the humoral response mimic hepatitis B
viral infection in humans. Proc Natl Acad
Sci
USA 1995;92:5307-5311
13
Mancini M, Davis H,
Tiollais P, Michel ML. DNA-based immunization against the envelope
proteins of the hepatitis B
virus.
J Biotechnol 1996;44:47-57
14 Mancini M, Hadchouel
M, Davis HL, Whalen RG, Tiollais P, Michel ML, DNA-mediated
immunization in a transgenic
mouse
model of the hepatitis B surface antigen chronic carrier state. Proc
Natl Acad Sci USA 1996;93:12496-12501
15 Hui J Y, Mancini M,
Li G D, Wang Y, Tiollais P, Michel M-L. Immunization with a plasmid
encoding a modified hepatitis B
surface
antigen carrying the receptor binding site for hepatocytes. Vaccine
1999;17:1771-1778
16 Choo QL, Kuo G,
Ralston R, Weiner A, Chien D, Van Nest G, Han J, Berger K, Thudium
K, Kuo C. Vaccination of
chimpanzees
against infection by the hepatitis C virus. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA
1994;91:1294-1298
17 Tedeschi V, Akatsuka
T, Shih JWK, Battegay M, Feinstone SM. A specific antibody response
to HCV E2 elicited in mice
by
intramuscular inoculation of plasmid DNA containing coding sequences
for E2. Hepatology 1997;25:459-462
18 Nakano I, Maertens
G, Major ME, Vitvitski L, Dubuisson J, Fournillier A, De Martynoff
G, Trepo C, Inchauspe G.
Immunization
with plasmid DNA encoding hepatitis C virus envelope E2 antigenic
domains induces antibodies whose
immune
reactivity is linked to the injection mode. J Virol
1997;71:7101-7109
19
Forns X, Emerson SU,
Tobin GJ, Mushahwar IK, Purcell RH, Bukh J. DNA immunization of mice
and macaques with
plasmids
encoding hepatitis C virus envelope E2 protein expressed
intracellularly and on the cell surface. Vaccine
1999;17:1992-2002
20 Fournillier A, Depla
E, Karayiannis P, Vidalin O, Maertens G, Trepo C, Inchauspe G.
Expression of noncovalent hepatitis
C
virus envelope E1-E2 complexes is not required for the induction of
antibodies with neutralizing properties following
DNA
immunization. J Virol 1999;73:7497-7504
21 Forns X, Payette PJ,
Ma X, Satterfield W, Eder G, Mushahwar IK, Govindarajan S, Davis HL,
Emerson SU, Purcell RH,
Bukh
J. Vaccination of chimpanzees with plasmid DNA encoding the
hepatitis C virus (HCV) envelope E2 protein
modified
the infection after challenge with homologous monoclonal HCV.
Hepatology 2000;32:618-25
22 Xu X, Li GD, Kong YY,
Yang HL, Zhang ZC, Cao HT, Wang Y. A modified hepatitis B virus
surface antigen with the
receptor-
binding site for hepatocytes at its C-terminus: Expression,
antigenicity and immunogenicity. J Gen Virol
1994;75:3673-3677
23 Hui JY, Li GD, Kong
YY, Wang Y. Expression and characterization of chimeric hepatitis B
surface antigen particles
carrying
preS epitopes. J Biotechnol 1999;72:49-59
24 Yang JY, Jin J, Kong
YY, Wei J, Zhang ZC, Li GD, Wang Y, Yuan HY, Li YY. Purification and
characterization of
recombinant
hepatitis B virus surface antigen SS1 expressed in Pichia pastoris.
Acta Biochem Biophys Sin
2000;32:503-508
25 Koshy R, Inchauspe
G. Evaluation of hepatitis C virus protein epitopes for vaccine
development. Trends Biotechnol
1996;149:364-369
26 Fournillier A,
Nakano I, Vitvitski L, Depla E, Vidalin O, Maertens G, Trepo C,
Inchauspe G. Modulation of immune
responses
to hepatitis c virus envelope E2 protein following injection of
plasmid DNA using single of combined delivery
routes.
Hepatology 1998;28:237-244
27 Lee JW, Kim KM, Jung
SH, Lee KJ, Choi EC, Sung YC, Kang CY. Identification of a domain
containing B-cell epitopes in
hepatitis
C virus E2 glycoprotein by using mouse monoclonal antibodies. J
Virol 1999;73:11-18
28
Wang Y, Okamoto H,
Tsuda F, Naqayama R, Tao QM, Mishiro S. Prevalence, genotypes, and
an isolate (HC-C2) of
Hepatitis
C Virus in Chinese patients with liver disease. J Med Virol
1993;40:254-260
29 Hui JY, Li GD, Kong
YY, Yuan Wang. DNA-based immunization against hepatitis B surface
antigen carrying preS
epitopes.
Chinese Sci Bull 1999;44:620-623
30 Feng Y, Kong YY,
Wang Y, Qi GR. Intracellular inhibition of the replication of
hepatitis B virus by hammerhead ribozyme.
J
Gastroenterol Hepatol 2001;16:1125-1130
31 Fuerst TR, Niles EG,
Studier FW, Moss B. Eukaryotic transient-expression system based on
recombinant vaccinia virus
that
synthesizes bacteriophage T7 RNA polymerase. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA
1986;83:8122-8126
32 Liu J, Zhu LX, Zhang
XX, Lu M, Kong YY, Wang Y, Li GD. Expression, purification,
immunological characterization and
application
of Escherichia coli-derived hepatitis C virus E2 proteins.
Biotechnol Appl Biochem 2001;34:109-119
33 Sun B, Wells J,
Goldmuntz E, Silver P, Remmers EF, Wilder RL, Caspi RR. A
simplified, competitive RT-PCR method for
measuring
rat IFN-α mRNA expression. J Immunol Methods 1996;195:139-148
34 Sun B, Rizzo LZ, Sun
SH, Chan CC, Wiggert B, Wilder RL, Caspi RR. Genetic susceptibility
to experimental autoimmune
uveitis
involves more than a predisposition to generate a T helper-1-like or
a T helper-2-like response. J Immunol
1997;159:1004-1011
35 He JK, Binn LN,
Caudill JD, Asher LV, Longer CF, Innis BL. Antiserum generated by
DNA vaccine binds to hepatitis E virus
(HEV)
as determined by PCR and immune electron microscopy (IEM):
application for HEV detection by affinity-capture
RT-PCR.
Virus Res 1999;62:59-65
36 Prange R, Werr M,
Birkner M, Hilfrich R, Streeck RE. Properties of modified hepatitis
B virus surface antigen particles
carrying
preS epitopes. J Gen Virol 1995;76:2131-2140
37 Major ME, Vitvitski
L, Mink MA, Schleer M, Whalen RG, Trepo C, Inchauspe G. DNA-based
immunization with chimeric
vectors
for the induction of immune responses against the Hepatitis C virus
nucleocapsid. J Virol 1995;69:5798-5805
38 Duvet S, Cocquerel
L, Pillez A, Cacan R, Verbert A, Moradpour D, Wychowski C, Dubuisson
J. Hepatitis C virus
glycoprotein
complex localization in the endoplasmic reticulum involves a
determinant for retention and not retrieval.
J
Biol Chem 1998;273:32088-32095
39 Saito T, Sherman GJ,
Kurokohchi K, Guo ZP, Donets M, Yu MY, Berzofsky JA, Akatsuka T,
Feinstone SM. Plasmid
DNA-based
immunization for hepatitis C virus structural proteins: immune
responses in mice. Gastroenterology
1997;112:1321-1330
40 Weiner AJ, Geysen
HM, Christopherson C, Hall JE, Mason TJ, Saracco G, Bonino F,
Crawford K, Marion CD, Crawford KA.
Evidence
for immune selection of hepatitis C virus (HCV) putative envelope
glycoprotein variants: potential role in
chronic
HCV infections. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1992;89:3468-3472
41 Zibert A, Schreier
E, Roggendorf M. Antibodies in human sera specific to hypervariable
region 1 of hepatitis C virus can
block
viral attachment. Virology 1995;208:653-661
42 Scarselli E, Cerino
A, Esposito G. Occurrence of antibodies reactive with more than one
variant of the putative envelope
glycoprotein(gp70)
hypervariable region 1 in viremic hepatitis C virus-infected
patients. J Virol 1995;69:4407-4412
43 Rosa D, Campagnoli
S, Moretto C, Guenzi E, Cousens L, Chin M, Dong C, Weiner AJ, Lau JY,
Choo QL, Chien D, Pileri P,
Houghton
M, Abrignani S. A quantitative test to estimate neutralizing
antibodies to the hepatitis C virus: cytofluorimetric
assessment
of envelope glycoprotein 2 binding to target cells. Proc Natl Acad
Sci USA 1996;93:1759-1763
44 Farci P, Shimoda A,
Wong D, Cabezon T, De Gioannis D, Strazzera A, Shimizu Y, Shapiro M,
Alter HJ, Purcell RH.
Prevention
of hepatitis C virus infection in chimpanzees by hyperimmune serum
against the hypervariable region 1 of
the
envelope 2 protein. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1996;93:15394-15399
45 Zibert A, Dudziak P,
Schreler E, Roggendorf M. Characterization of antibody response to
hepatitis C virus protein E2 and
significance
of hypervariable region 1-specific antibodies in viral
neutralization. Arch Virol 1997;142:523-534
46 Esumi M, Ahmed M,
Zhou YH, Takahashi H, Shikata T. Murine antibodies against E2 and
hypervariable region 1
cross-reactively
capture Hepatitis C virus. Virology 1998;251:158-164
47 Watanabe K, Yoshioka
K, Ito H, Ishigami M, Takagi K, Utsunomiya S, Kobayashi M, Kishimoto
H, Yano M, Kakumu S. The
hypervariable
region 1 protein of Hepatitis C virus broadly reactive with sera of
patients with chronic Hepatitis C has a
similar
amino acid sequence with the consensus sequence. Virology
1999;264:153-158
48 Shang DZ, Zhai WW,
Allain JP. Broadly cross-reactive, high-affinity antibody to
hypervariable region 1 of the Hepatitis
C
virus in rabbits. Virology 1999;258:396-405
49 Ishii K, Rosa D,
Watanabe Y, Katayama T, Harada H, Wyatt C, Kiyosawa K, Aizaki H,
Matsuura Y, Houghton M,
Abrignani
S, Miyamura T. High titers of antibodies inhibiting the binding of
envelope to human cells correlate with
natural
resolution of chronic hepatitis C. Hepatology 1998;28:1117-1120
50 Mink MA, Benichou S,
Madaule P, Tiollais P, Prince AM, Inchauspe G. Characterization and
mapping of a B-cell
immunogenic
domain in hepatitis C virus glycoprotein using a yeast peptide
library. Virology 1994;200:246-255
Edited
by Pang
LH
| |