|
Lun-Xiu
Qin, Zhao-You Tang, Zeng-Chen Ma, Zhi-Quan Wu, Xin-Da Zhou, Qing-Hai
Ye, Yuan Ji, Li-Wen Huang, Hu-Liang Jia, Hui-Chuan Sun, Lu Wang,
Liver Cancer Institute and Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University,
Shanghai, China
Supported by the Key Project of Medical Development in
Shanghai, the National Science Funding for Young Scientists (No.
30000075), and Fund for Leading Specialty of Shanghai Metropolitan
Bureau of Public Health
Correspondence to: Zhao-You Tang, M.D., Professor &
Chairman, Liver Cancer Institute & Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan
University, 136 Yi Xue Yuan Road, Shanghai 200032, China. zytang@srcap.stc.sh.cn
Telephone: +86-21-64037181
Received 2001-09-26 Accepted 2001-10-29
Abstract
AIM: To confirm if p53 mutation could be a routine predictive
marker for the prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients.
METHODS: Two hundreds and forty-four formalin-fixed
paraffin-embedded tumor samples of the patients with HCC receiving
liver resection were detected for nuclear accumulation of p53. The
percent of P53 immunoreactive tumor cells was scored as 0 to 3+ in
P53 positive region (<10% -, 10-30% +, 31-50% ++, >50% +++).
Proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) and some
clinicopathological characteristics, including patients' sex,
preoperative serum AFP level, tumor size, capsule, vascular invasion
(both visual and microscopic), and Edmondson grade were also
evaluated.
RESULTS: In univariate COX harzard regression model analysis,
tumor size, capsule status, vascular invasion, and p53 expression
were independent factors that were closely related to the overall
survival (OS) rates of HCC patients. The survival rates of patients
with 3+ for P53 expression were much lower than those with 2+ or +
for P53 expression. Only vascular invasion (P<0.05) and
capsule (P<0.01) were closely related to the disease-free
survival (DFS) of HCC patients. In multivariate analysis, p53
overexpression (RI 0.5456, P<0.01) was the most
significant factor associated with the OS rates of patients after
HCC resection, while tumor size (RI 0.5209, P<0.01),
vascular invasion (RI 0.5271, P<0.01) and capsule
(RI-0.8691, P<0.01) were also related to the OS. However,
only tumor capsular status was an independent predictive factor (P<0.05)
for the DFS. No significant prognostic value was found in PCNA-LI,
Edmondson's grade, patients' sex and preoperative serum AFP level.
CONCLUSION: Accumulation of p53 expression, as well as tumor
size, capsule and vascular invasion, could be valuable markers for
predicting the prognosis of HCC patients after resection. The
quantitative immunohistochemical scoring for P53 nuclear
accumulation might be more valuable for predicting prognosis of
patients after HCC resection than the common qualitative analysis.
Qin LX, Tang ZY, Ma ZC, Wu ZQ, Zhou XD, Ye QH, Ji Y, Huang LW, Jia
HL, Sun HC, Wang L. P53 immunohistochemical scoring: an independent
prognostic marker for patients after hepatocellular carcinoma
resection. World J Gastroenterol 2002;8(3):459-463
INTRODUCTION
Liver cancer has been ranked the 2nd cancer killer in
China since 1990s. The age-standardized mortality rate in China is
as high as 34.7/105, which accounts for 53% of all liver
cancer deaths worldwide[1]. Although many advances in its
clinical study have been made, a definitive subset is cured by
surgery only, and encouraging long-term survival of patients have
been obtained in some clinical centers, the overall dismal outcome
of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) have not been
completely changed[2,3]. Lack of control of metastatic
foci and recurrence is the most prevalent cause of death in patients
with HCC, and it is important to identify the factors that
predispose patients to death. Much effort has been made to predict
HCC behavior, but there is still lack of specific prognostic
indicators.
Prognostic
factors in HCC conventionally consist of staging with the tumor node
metastasis system (TNM) and grading by tumor cellular
differentiation. With new discoveries in the cancer biology,
pathological and biological factors of HCC in relation to prognosis
have been studied quite extensively. Morphological features of the
tumor, both gross and histological, are found to be significantly
associated with tumor recurrence and patient survival. A
complementary approach is to analyze the HCC for molecular markers
with prognostic significance with reference to the recurring
possibility and survival time. A large number of molecular
biological factors have been shown to be associated with the
invasiveness of HCC, and have potential prognostic significance,
e.g. c-erbB-2, uPA, PAI-I, VEGF, CDKN2 and p53 mutations, p53
antibody, H-ras, mdm-2, TGF α, EGFR, VEGF, bFGF, PD-ECGF,
MMP-2, ICAM-1 are positively related to HCC invasiveness, whereas
nm23-H1, Kai-1, TIMP-2, Integrin α5 and E-cadherin are
negatively relative factors[4]. Although a great amount
of markers have been tried, a routine biomarker for prediction of
prognosis of HCC is not yet available.
As
early as in 1995, we found that p53 mutations were related to the
invasiveness of HCC. Thereafter, we performed immunohistochemical
staining for p53 overexpression in the surgical specimen of HCC
patients treated in our institute, to see if p53 mutation could be a
routine predictive marker for the prognosis of HCC patients. In the
present study, we reviewed the results of the studies over the past
5 years, and evaluated whether nuclear accumulation of p53 would be
a feasible prognostic marker in the routine diagnostic evaluation of
HCC, in particular, to analyze the relationship between p53
overexpression and survival of patients with HCC.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Tumor samples and HCC patients
Totally, 256 consecutive patients with HCC were enrolled in
this study. All of them were surgically treated in the Liver Cancer
Institute of Fudan University (former Liver Cancer Institute of
Shanghai Medical University), Shanghai, China in the years
1996-1999. Except for 12 cases without informative follow-up data,
244 cases were reviewed, which included 197 male (80.7%) and 47
female (19.3%). The mean age was 50.4 (15-76) years. All specimens
were formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded, which were proved to be
hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Some histological characteristics
including the states of capsule, vascular invasion (both visual and
microscopic), cell differentiation were reviewed by one pathologist.
The mean tumor size was 5.9 (1-16)cm, <=5cm in 131 cases (53.7%),
>5cm but <=8cm 56 cases (23.0%), and >8cm 57 cases (23.3%).
The tumor of 128 cases (52.5%) had no capsule, and 116 cases (47.5%)
were well-capsulated. The Edmondson grade distribution was grade I
in 7 (2.9%) cases, Grade II-III in 235 (96.3%) cases, and grade IV
in 2 (0.8%) cases. Vascular invasion was found in 69 cases (28.3%),
which included visual tumor thrombi in portal vein in 31 cases and
microvascular invasion in 38 cases. Obvious evidence of liver
cirrhosis was found in 217 (88.9%) cases, no cirrhosis in 27 (11.1%)
cases. Two hundred and twenty-two cases (91%, 222/244) were followed
up. The mean follow-up time was 21.6 (2.2-49) months.
Immunohistochemistry
A standard indirect immunoperoxidase protocol was used for
immunohistochemistry (ABC-Elite; Vector Laboratories, Inc.,
Burlingame, CA). Monoclonal anti-p53, PCNA antibodies (Dako) were
used for detection of p53 and PCNA, respectively (1:200 dilution in
PBS containing 1% bovine serum albumin and 0.1% Triton X-100). A
high-temperature (20 minutes in a pressure cooker) treatment
procedure with antigen unmasking solution (Vector Laboratories,
Inc.) was used to enhance the staining. The primary antibody was
omitted for negative controls.
We
used the percentage of p53-positive tumor nuclei in all major foci
of cancer as p53 immunohistochemical scoring system. The percent of
p53 immunoreactive tumor cells was scored as 0 to 3+ in p53 positive
regions. Nuclear p53 expression in >=10% of tumor cells was
scored as aberrant overexpression, <10% -, 10%-30% +, 31%-50% ++,
and >50% +++.
The
patients' sex, serum AFP level, and the pathological characteristics
of tumor, including tumor size, capsule, vascular invasion (both
visual and microscopic), Edmondson grade, etc. were also evaluated.
Statistical analyses
The log-rank test, Kaplan-Meier analysis and univariate and
multivariate Cox regression modeling were used for evaluation of
contribution of the variables to relapse and disease-specific
survival. Overall and disease-free survival rates were calculated
with the Life-Table method, and the survival time was calculated
from the operative date. The survival curves were estimated by
Kaplan-Meier analysis. The prognostic significance of these markers
was analyzed using the log-rank test. A Cox regression analysis was
performed to show the relationship of the markers studied with the
overall and disease-free survival rates of the HCC patients, and to
identify the prognostic factors of the HCC patient after operation.
The results were correlated with clinicopathological parameters and
the prognosis evaluated by uni- and multi-variate analysis using
local control, freedom from distant metastasis, disease-free
survival, and overall survival as endpoints.
RESULTS
The 1-, 3- and 5-year overall survival rates of the 244 cases of
HCC patients studied were 81.9%, 57.6% and 48.7%, respectively. And,
the 1-, 3- and 5-year disease-free survival rates were 55.2%, 38.3%,
and 32.2%, respectively. p53 immunohistochemical staining was
heterogeneous in the HCC tissues, and nuclear staining for p53 were
found in 112 of the 222 (50.5%) cases. The 1-, 3- and 5-year overall
survival rates of the HCC patients with positive p53 nuclear
accumulation were 81.2% (91/112), 50.9% (57/112), and 33.0%
(37/112), while those of the HCC patients with negative p53
expression were 88.8%, 66.3% and 60.6%, respectively. Furthermore,
among the patients with positive P53 expression, those with 3+
(>50%) for P53 immunohistochemical scoring had a poorest
prognosis, their 1-, and 3-year overall survival rates were only
38.5%, and 12.3%, which were much lower that those with 2+ (60.0%
and 46.7%, respectively) and those with + (83.5% and 57.3%,
respectively). Therefore, the score of P53 overexpression was
adversely related to the survival rates of HCC patients (Table 1).
Table 1 Relationship between some clinicopathological
parameters and overall survival rates
of HCC patients (a univariate analysis)
|
Parameters
|
n
|
Overall
survival rates %
|
|
1-year
|
3-year
|
5-year
|
|
P53
expression
|
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
110
|
88.8
|
66.3
|
60.6
|
|
+
|
86
|
83.5
|
57.3
|
42.9
|
|
++
|
13
|
60.0
|
46.7
|
|
|
+++b
|
13
|
38.5
|
12.3
|
|
|
Tumors
size (cm)
|
|
|
|
|
|
<=5cm
|
122
|
92.6
|
69.0
|
55.8
|
|
>5,
<=8cm
|
50
|
78.0
|
63.0
|
55.1
|
|
>8cmb
|
50
|
60.0
|
23.9
|
|
|
Vascular
invasion
|
|
|
|
|
|
No
|
160
|
88.7
|
68.5
|
60.7
|
|
Microscopic
|
36
|
80.6
|
47.0
|
|
|
Visual
|
26
|
42.3
|
7.5
|
|
|
Capsule
|
|
|
|
|
|
No
|
112
|
74.0
|
42.0
|
26.4
|
|
Wellb
|
110
|
90.5
|
75.9
|
75.9
|
bP<0.01
The
overall survival rates of patients after radical resection of small
HCC (<=5cm) were higher than those >5cm and <=8cm in
diameter. The 3-year survival rate of those with tumor >8cm in
diameter (23.9%) was much lower than those with tumor <=8cm in
diameter (63.0%) (Table 1). The 1- and 3-year overall survival rates
of the HCC patients with vascular invasion (both visual and
microscopic) were 64.5% (42/62) and 30.6% (19/62), respectively. The
patients with visual tumor thrombi in portal vein had a poorer
prognosis, their 1- and 3-year overall survival rates were only
42.3% (11/26) and 7.5% (2/26), respectively. No 5-year survival was
found. The 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year overall survival rates of
patients without vascular invasion were 88.7%, 68.5%, and 60.7%,
respectively, which were much higher than those with vascular
invasion (P<0.01). A similar situation was also found with
disease-free survival (Table 1). The 1-, 3-, and 5-year overall
survival rates of patients with well-capsulated HCC were 90.5%,
75.9%, and 75.9%, respectively, while those of the patients without
tumor capsule were 74.0%, 42.0%, and 26.4% Table. No significant
relationship between the PCNA-LI, Edmondson grade, patients' sex, or
serum AFP level, and overall or disease-free survival rates was
found (P>0.05).
In
univariate Cox harzard regression model analysis, tumor size,
capsule status, vascular invasion, p53 expression were independent
factors that were closely related to the overall survival rates of
HCC patients, while no obvious relationship was found between the
PCNA (P>0.05) expression and the overall survival. Only
vascular invasion (P=0.0187) and tumor capsule (P=0.0059)
were closely related to the disease-free survival of HCC patients,
no obvious relationship was found between p53, PCNA status and the
disease-free survival (Tables 1, 2).
Similarly,
in multivariate analysis, the p53 (RI 0.5456, P<0.01) was
the most significant factor associated with the overall survival
rates of HCC patients after resection. Tumor size (RI 0.5209, P<0.01),
vessel invasion (RI 0.5271, P<0.01) and capsule
(RI-0.8691, P<0.01) were also related to the overall
survival. For the disease-free survival, tumor capsule status
remained the only independent predictive factor (P<0.05,
Table 3). No significant prognostic value was found in the PCNA-LI,
Edmondson grade, or patients' sex, serum AFP level for the overall
or disease-free survival both in univariate and multivariate Cox
analyses.
Table 2 Parameters affecting the disease-free survival rates
of HCC patients (a univariate analysis)
|
Parameters
|
n
|
Disease-free
survival rates (%)
|
|
1-year
|
3-year
|
5-year
|
|
Vascular
invasion
|
|
|
|
|
|
No
|
116
|
93.9
|
64.6
|
54.2
|
|
Yesa
|
22
|
72.7
|
37.0
|
|
|
Capsule
|
|
|
|
|
|
No
|
57
|
82.3
|
44.9
|
44.9
|
|
Yesb
|
81
|
96.3
|
73.2
|
|
aP<0.05,
bP<0.01, vs No
Table 3 Relationship between some clinicopathological
parameters and overall survival rates of HCC patients (a
multivariate analysis)
|
|
Correlation
coefficient
|
Wald
|
Standard
error
|
P
|
|
P53
expression
|
0.55
|
18.88
|
0.13
|
<0.01
|
|
Tumor
size
|
0.52
|
14.97
|
0.13
|
<0.01
|
|
Vascular
invasion
|
0.53
|
11.85
|
0.15
|
<0.01
|
|
Tumor
capsule
|
-0.87
|
10.30
|
-0.10
|
<0.01
|
DISCUSSION
It is difficult to predict the prognosis of patients with HCC,
because so far, there is no any specific marker for that yet.
Assessment of the clinicopathological and biological malignancy of
HCC may help predict outcome. Some pathological features, such as
size of the tumor, vascular invasion, fibrous capsule infiltration,
and intrahepatic metastasis are thought as prognostic factors for
HCC[5]. New invasiveness scoring system has been proposed
based on the items such as venous invasion, tumor capsule,
intrahepatic spreading, etc. In our previous report, tumor size was
the most important factor for the prognosis of HCC patients and
postoperative recurrence possibility[3]. In this study,
in univariate Cox harzard regression model analysis, tumor size,
capsule status, and vascular invasion were independent factors which
were closely related to both of the overall and disease-free
survival rates of HCC patients. Similarly, in multivariate analysis,
they were also independent prognostic factors for the overall
survival, and the tumor capsule status and vascular invasion were
predictive factors for disease-free survival. All these further
confirmed the significance of pathological characteristics of tumor
itself in the survival of HCC patients, and the importance of early
detection, early diagnosis and early treatment of HCC.
Some
biomarkers such as the tumor DNA content, P53 protein expression,
proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) labeling index, and
argyrophilic proteins of nuclear organizer regions were used as
markers of biological malignancy. P53 protein plays a central role
in cellular responses, including cell-cycle arrest and cell death in
response to DNA damage. p53 dysfunction can induce abnormal cell
growth, increased cell survival, genetic instability, and drug
resistance. p53 mutations occur in approximately half of human
cancers. Associations of p53 mutation or positive
immunohistochemical stain with higher grade and more advanced stage
are common. p53 mutation has been found related to advanced tumor
stage in cancers of endometrium, cervix, ovary, liver, prostate and
bladder, indicating that for these tumors p53 mutation may be a late
event contributing to tumor progression[6]. And p53
mutation has been reported to be a strong marker predicting an
increased risk of local relapse, treatment failure, and overall and
disease-free survival in many kinds of human carcinomas, such as
breast[7-11], colon-recta[12,13], esophagus[14],
head and neck[15], lung[16-18], ovarian[19],
as well as sarcoma[20]. An increased intracellular
concentration of the P53 protein, although not identical to, is
sometimes seen in tumors with p53 mutation and correlated with poor
prognosis in some tumors. Several studies have shown a relationship
between the nuclear accumulation of p53 protein and poor
disease-free and overall survival of prostate cancer[21,22],
and oral cancer[23]. Detection of micrometastasis of the
regional lymph nodes of ovarian cancer by immunohistochemical
staining of P53 protein may be useful in predicting the prognosis of
patients with stae I or II epithelial ovarian cancer[24].
The presence of serum anti-p53 antibody has also been found to be
associated with survival of patients with breast cancer, ovarian
cancer, and hepatocellular carcinoma, and colorectal cancer[25,26].
However, there is still a great controversy as to whether alteration
of the p53 gene adversely affects the survival of cancer patients.
Many reports failed to show the independent prognostic value of p53
in the carcinomas of tongue[27], breast[28-30],
stomach[31], lung[32], ovarian[33],
bladder[34,35], colorectal[36], and
non-Hodgkin's lymphoma[37].
In
a similar situation, there are controversial results about the
relationship between the p53 overexpression or p53 gene mutation and
the prognosis of HCC patients. It was shown that p53 mutation was
involved in determining the dedifferentiation, the proliferative
activity, tumor progression[38], and closely related to
the invasiveness of HCC[4], which might also influence
the postoperative course. Mutations of p53 gene or positive
immunostaining for mutant P53 protein expression could be used as a
significant indicator of poor prognosis[39-41]. Serum
anti-p53 antibody could also be a useful prognostic factor for
patients with HCC[42]. However, many studies showed that
neither the immunohistochemical detection of p53 expression, nor the
serum anti-p53 antibodies had a significant prognostic value for
outcome of patients with HCC[43-45].
In
this study, nuclear staining for P53 was found in 112 of the 222
(50.5%) cases, which was similar to the previous study. The 3-year
and 5-year overall survival rates of the HCC patients with positive
P53 nuclear accumulation were much lower than those of the HCC
patients with negative P53 expression. Its significance was even
better than that of the factors such as tumor size, vascular
invasion and tumor capsule, though they were also related to the
overall survival. Therefore, the score of P53 overexpression was
adversely related to the survival rates of HCC patients. These
indicated that p53 mutation or nuclear accumulation of p53
expression could be a valuable marker for predicting the prognosis
of HCC patients after resection. Among the patients with positive
P53 expression, those with 3+ (>50%) for P53 immunohistochemical
scoring had a poorest prognosis, their 1-, and 3-year overall
survival rates were only 38.5% and 12.3%, respectively, which were
much lower that those with 2+ (60.0% and 46.7%) and those with +
(83.5% and 57.3%). Therefore, the quantitative immunohistochemical
scoring for P53 expression might be more valuable than the common
qualitative analysis for P53 expression for predicting the prognosis
of HCC patients.
Proliferating
cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) labeling index has been thought as
another marker of biological malignancy. A correlation between PCNA-LI
and recurrent time and rate was reported. PCNA-LI could be a
valuable prognostic marker for HCC. However, in this study, no
correlation between PCNA-LI and overall or disease-free survival was
found.
In
summary, HCC is one of the most common cancers in China. Although
great advances in its clinical study have been made, metastatic
recurrence is the most prevalent cause of death in patients with HCC.
Over the past few years, much effort has been made on this target,
including predicting HCC behavior[46-60]. In this study,
through the retrospective review of the 244 HCC patients, we found
that accumulation of p53 expression as well as tumor size, capsule
or vascular invasion could be a valuable marker for predicting the
prognosis of HCC patients after resection. The quantitative
immunohistochemical scoring for P53 nuclear accumulation might be
more valuable than the common qualitative analysis for P53
expression for predicting prognosis of patients after HCC resection.
REFERENCES
1 Pisani P, Parkin M, Bray F, Ferlay J. Estimates of the
worldwide mortality from 25 cancers in 25 cancers in 1990.
Int
J Cancer 1999;83:18-29
2 Greenlee RT, Hill-Harmon MB, Murray T, Thun M. Cancer
Statistics, 2001. CA Cancer J Clin 2001;51:15-36
3
Tang ZY. Hepatocellular carcinoma-Cause, treatment and
metastasis. World J Gastroenterol 2001;7:445-454
4 Tang ZY, Qin LX, Wang XM, Zhou G, Liao Y, Weng Y, Jiang XP,
Lin ZY, Liu KD, Ye SL. Alterations of oncogenes, tumor
suppressor
genes and growth factors in hepatocellular carcinoma: with relation
to tumor size and invasiveness. Chin
Med
J 1998;111:313-318
5 Poon RT, Fan ST, Ng IO, Lo CM, Liu CL, Wong J. Different risk
factors and prognosis for early and late intrahepatic
recurrence
after resection of hepatocellular carcinoma. Cancer 2000;89:500-507
6 Greenblatt MS, Bennett WP, Hollstein M, Harris CC. Mutations
in the p53 tumor suppressor gene: Clues to cancer
etiology
and molecular pathogenesis. Cancer Res 1994;54:4855-4878
7 Overgaard J, Yilmaz M, Guldberg P, Hansen LL, Alsner J. TP53
mutation is an independent prognostic marker for poor
outcome
in both node-negative and node-positive breast cancer. Acta Oncol
2000;39:327-333
8 Zellars RC, Hilsenbeck SG, Clark GM, Allred DC, Herman TS,
Chamness GC, Elledge RM. Prognostic value of p53 for
local
failure in mastectomy-treated breast cancer patients. J Clin Oncol
2000;18:1906-1913
9 Takahashi M, Tonoki H, Tada M, Kashiwazaki H, Furuuchi K,
Hamada J, Fujioka Y, Sato Y, Takahashi H, Todo S,
Sakuragi
N, Moriuchi T. Distinct prognostic values of p53 mutations and loss
of estrogen receptor and their
cumulative effect
in primary breast cancers. Int J Cancer 2000;89:92-99
10 Blaszyk H, Hartmann
A, Cunningham JM, Schaid D, Wold LE, Kovach JS, Sommer SS. A
prospective trial of midwest
breast
cancer patients: a p53 gene mutation is the most important predictor
of adverse outcome. Int J Cancer
2000;89:32-38
11 Sirvent JJ, Fortuno-Mar
A, Olona M, Orti A. Prognostic value of p53 protein expression and
clinicopathological factors in
infiltrating
ductal carcinoma of the breast. A study of 192 patients. Histol
Histopathol 2001;16:99-106
12 Bouzourene H,Gervaz
P,Cerottini JP,Benhattar J,Chaubert P,Saraga E,Pampallona S,Bosman
FT,Givel JC.p53 and Ki-ras
as
prognostic factors for Dukes'stage B colorectal cancer.Eur J Cancer
2000;36:1008-1015
13 Kahlenberg MS,
Stoler DL, Rodriguez-Bigas MA, Weber TK, Driscoll DL, Anderson GR,
Petrelli NJ. p53 tumor suppressor
gene
mutations predict decreased survival of patients with sporadic
colorectal carcinoma. Cancer 2000;88:1814-1819
14 Ireland AP, Shibata
DK, Chandrasoma P, Lord RV, Peters JH, DeMeester TR. Clinical
significance of p53 mutations in
adenocarcinoma
of the esophagus and cardia. Ann Surg 2000;231:179-187
15 Tamas L, Kraxner H,
Mechtler L, Repassy G, Ribari O, Hirschberg A, Szentkuti G, Jaray B,
Szentirmay Z. Prognostic
significance
of P53 histochemistry and DNA histogram parameters in head and neck
malignancies. Anticancer Res
2000;20:4031-4037
16 Gemba K, Ueoka H,
Kiura K, Tabata M, Harada M. Immunohistochemical detection of mutant
p53 protein in small-cell
lung
cancer: relationship to treatment outcome. Lung Cancer 2000;29:23-31
17 Murakami I, Hiyama
K, Ishioka S, Yamakido M, Kasagi F, Yokosaki Y. p53 gene mutations
are associated with shortened
survival
in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer: an analysis of
medically managed patients. Clin Cancer
Res
2000;6:526-530
18 Mitsudomi T,
Hamajima N, Ogawa M, Takahashi T. Prognostic significance of p53
alterations in patients with non-small
cell
lung cancer: a meta-analysis. Clin Cancer Res 2000;6:4055-4063
19 Shahin MS, Hughes JH,
Sood AK, Buller RE. The prognostic significance of p53 tumor
suppressor gene alterations in
ovarian
carcinoma. Cancer 2000;89:2006-2017
20 de Alava E,
Antonescu CR, Panizo A, Leung D, Meyers PA, Huvos AG, Pardo-Mindan
FJ, Healey JH, Ladanyi M. Prognostic
impact
of P53 status in Ewing sarcoma. Cancer 2000;89:783-792
21 Borre M,
Stausbol-Gron B, Overgaard J. p53 accumulation associated with
bcl-2, the proliferation marker MIB-1 and
survival
in patients with prostate cancer subjected to watchful waiting. J
Urol 2000;164:716-721
22 Leibovich BC, Cheng
L, Weaver AL, Myers RP, Bostwick DG. Outcome prediction with p53
immunostaining after radical
prostatectomy
in patients with locally advanced prostate cancer. J Urol
2000;163:1756-1760
23 Osaki T, Kimura T,
Tatemoto Y, Dapeng L, Yoneda K, Yamamoto T. Diffuse mode of tumor
cell invasion and expression
of
mutant p53 protein but not of p21 protein are correlated with
treatment failure in oral carcinomas and their
metastatic
foci. Oncology 2000;59:36-43
24 Suzuki M, Ohwada M,
Saga Y, Kohno T, Takei Y, Sato I. Micrometastatic p53-positive cells
in the lymph nodes of early
stage
epithelial ovarian cancer: prognostic significance. Oncology
2001;60:170-175
25 Shiota G, Ishida M,
Noguchi N, Oyama K, Takano Y, Okubo M, Katayama S, Tomie Y, Harada
K, Hori K, Ashida K,
Kishimoto
Y, Hosoda A, Suou T, Kanbe T, Tanaka K, Nosaka K, Tanida O, Kojo H,
Miura K, Ito H, Kaibara N, Kawasaki H.
Circulating
p53 antibody in patients with colorectal cancer: relation to
clinicopathologic features and survival. Dig Dis
Sci
2000;45:122-128
26 Vogl FD, Frey M,
Kreienberg R, Runnebaum IB. Autoimmunity against p53 predicts
invasive cancer with poor survival
in
patients with an ovarian mass. Br J Cancer 2000;83:1338-1343
27 Kantola S, Parikka
M, Jokinen K, Hyrynkangs K, Soini Y, Alho OP, Salo T. Prognostic
factors in tongue cancer - relsative
importance
of demographic, clinical and histopathological factors. Br J Cancer
2000;83:614-619
28 Ferrero JM, Ramaioli
A, Formento JL, Francoual M, Etienne MC, Peyrottes I, Ettore F,
Leblanc-Talent P, Namer M, Milano
G.
P53 determination alongside classical prognostic factors in
node-negative breast cancer: an evaluation at more than
10-year
follow-up. Ann Oncol 2000;11:393-397
29 Bergh J. Clinical
studies of p53 in treatment and benefit of breast cancer patients.
Endocr Relat Cancer 1999;6:51-59
30 Reed W, Hannisdal E,
Boehler PJ, Gundersen S, Host H, Marthin J. The prognostic value of
p53 and c-erb B-2
immunostaining
is overrated for patients with lymph node negative breast carcinoma:
a multivariate analysis of
prognostic
factors in 613 patients with a follow-up of 14-30 years. Cancer
2000;88:804-813
31 Kaye PV, Radebold K,
Isaacs S, Dent DM. Expression of p53 and p21waf1/cip1 in gastric
carcinoma: lack of
inter-relationship
or correlation with prognosis. Eur J Surg Oncol 2000;26:39-43
32 Schiller JH, Adak S,
Feins RH, Keller SM, Fry WA, Livingston RB, Hammond ME, Wolf B,
Sabatini L, Jett J, Kohman L,
Johnson
DH. Lack of prognostic significance of p53 and K-ras mutations in
primary resected non-small-cell lung cancer
on
E4592: a Laboratory Ancillary Study on an Eastern Cooperative
Oncology Group Prospective Randomized Trial of
Postoperative
Adjuvant Therapy. J Clin Oncol 2001;19:448-457
33 Gadducci A, Cianci
C, Cosio S, Carnino F, Fanucchi A, Buttitta F, Conte PF, Genazzani
AR. p53 status is neither a
predictive
nor a prognostic variable in patients with advanced ovarian cancer
treated with a paclitaxel-based regimen.
Anticancer
Res 2000;20:4793-4799
34 Gontero P, Casetta
G, Zitella A, Ballario R, Pacchioni D, Magnani C, Muir GH, Tizzani
A. Evaluation of P53 protein
overexpression,
Ki67 proliferative activity and mitotic index as markers of tumour
recurrence in superficial transitional
cell
carcinoma of the bladder. Eur Urol 2000;38:287-296
35 Fleshner N, Kapusta
L, Ezer D, Herschorn S, Klotz L. p53 nuclear accumulation is not
associated with decreased
disease-free
survival in patients with node positive transitional cell carcinoma
of the bladder. J Urol 2000;164:1177-182
36 Gallego MG, Acenero
MJ, Ortega S, Delgado AA, Cantero JL. Prognostic influence of p53
nuclear overexpression in
colorectal
carcinoma. Colon Rectum 2000;43:971-975
37 Nieder C, Petersen
S, Petersen C, Thames HD. The challenge of p53 as prognostic and
predictive factor in Hodgkin's or
non-Hodgkin's
lymphoma. Ann Hematol 2001;80:2-8
38 Itoh T, Shiro T,
Seki T, Nakagawa T, Wakabayashi M, Inoue K, Okamura A. Relationship
between p53 overexpression
and
the proliferative activity in hepatocellular carcinoma. Int J Mol
Med 2000;6:137-142
39 Jeng KS, Sheen IS,
Chen BF, Wu JY. Is the p53 gene mutation of prognostic value in
hepatocellular carcinoma after
resection?
Arch Surg 2000;135:1329-1333
40 Sugo H, Takamori S,
Kojima K, Beppu T, Futagawa S. The significance of p53 mutations as
an indicator of the biological
behavior
of recurrent hepatocellular carcinomas. Surg Today 1999;29:849-855
41 Hayashi H, Sugio K,
Matsumata T, Adachi E, Takenaka K, Sugimachi K. The clinical
significance of p53 gene mutation in
hepatocellular
carcinomas from Japan. Hepatology 1995;22:1702-1707
42 Shiota G, Kishimoto
Y, Suyama A, Okubo M, Katayama S, Harada K, Ishida M, Hori K, Suou
T, Kawasaki H. Prognostic
significance
of serum anti-p53 antibody in patients with hepatocellular
carcinoma. J Hepatol 1997;27:661-668
43 Tangkijvanich P,
Janchai A, Charuruks N, Kullavanijaya P, Theamboonlers A, Hirsch P,
Poovorawan Y. Clinical
associations
and prognostic significance of serum anti-p53 antibodies in Thai
patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.
Asian
Pac J Allergy Immunol 2000;18:237-243
44 Saffroy R, Lelong JC,
Azoulay D, Salvucci M, Reynes M, Bismuth H, Debuire B, Lemoine A.
Clinical significance of
circulating
anti-p53 antibodies in European patients with hepatocellular
carcinoma. Br J Cancer 1999;79:604-610
45 Terris B, Laurent-Puig
P, Belghitti J, Degott C, Henin D, Flejou JF. Prognostic influence
of clinicopathologic features,
DNA-ploidy,
CD44H and p53 expression in a large series of resected
hepatocellular carcinoma in France. Int J Cancer
1997;74:614-619
46
Tang ZY, Sun FX, Tian
J, Ye SL, Liu YK, Liu KD, Xue Q, Chen J, Xia JL, Qin LX, Sun HC,
Wang L, Zhou J, Li Y, Ma ZC,
Zhou
XD, Wu ZQ, Lin ZY, Yang BH. Metastatic human hepatocellular
carcinoma models in nude mice and cell line with
metastatic
potential. World J Gastroenterol 2001;7:597-601
47
Li Y, Tang ZY, Ye SL,
Liu YK, Chen J, Xue Q, Chen J, Gao DM,Bao WH. Establishmen of cell
clones with different
metastatic
potential from the metastatic hepatocellular carcinoma cell line
MHCC97. World J Gastroenterol
2001;7:630-636
48
Niu Q, Tang ZY, Ma ZC,
Qin LX, Zhang LH. Serum vascular endothelial growth factor is a
potential biomarker of
metastatic
recurrence after curative resection of hepatocellular carcinoma.
World J Gastroenterol 2000;6:565-568
49
Wu ZQ, Fan J, Qiu SJ,
Zhou J, Tang ZY. The value of postoperative hepatic regional
chemotherapy in prevention of
recurrence
after radical resection of primary liver cancer. World J
Gastroenterol 2000;6:131-133
50
Wang Q, Lin ZY, Feng
XL. Alterations in metastatic properties of hepatocellular carcinoma
cell following H-ras oncogene
transfection.
World J Gastroenterol 2001;7:335-339
51
Jiang YF, Yang ZH, Hu
JQ. Recurrence or metastasis of HCC: predictors, early detection and
experimental antiangiogenic
therapy.
World J Gastroenterol 2000;6:61-65
52
Cao XY, Liu J, Lian ZR,
Clayton M, Hu JL, Zhu MH, Fan DM, Feitelson M. Cloning of
differentially expressed genes in
human
hepatocellular carcinoma and nontumor liver. World J Gastroenterol
2001;7:579-582
53
Hou L, Li Y, Jia YH,
Wang B, Xin Y, Ling MY. Molecular mechanism about lymphogenous
metastasis of hepatocarcinoma
cells
in mice. World J Gastroenterol 2001;7:532-536
54
Fan ZR, Yang DH, Cui J,
Qin HR, Huang CC. Expression of insulin-like growth factor Ⅱ
and its receptor in
hepatocellular
carcinogenesis. World J Gastroenterol 2001;7:285-288
55
Xu J, Mei MH, Zeng SE,
Shi QF, Liu YM, Qin LL. Expressions of ICAM and its mRNA in sera and
tissues of patients with
hepatocellular
carcinoma. World J Gastroenterol 2001;7:120-125
56
Huang XF, Wang CM, Dai
XW, Li ZJ, Pan BR, Yu LB, Qian B, Fang L. Expressions of
chromogranin: A and cathepsin D
in
human primary hepatocellular carcinoma. World J Gastroenterol
2000;6:693-698
57
Mei MH, Xu J, Shi QF,
Yang JH, Chen Q, Qin LL. Clinical significance of serum
intercellular adhesion molecule 1 detection
in
patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. World J Gastroenterol
2000;6:408-410
58
Qin Y, Li B, Tan YS,
Sun ZL, Zuo FQ, Sun ZF. Polymorphism of p16INK4a gene and rare
mutation of p15INK4b gene
exon2
in primary hepatocarcinoma. World J Gastroenterol 2000;6:411-414
59
Kong XB, Yang ZK, Liang
LJ, Huang JF, Lin HL. Overexpression of Pglycoprotein in
hepatocellular carcinoma and its
clinical
implication. World J Gastroenterol 2000;6:134-135
60
Lin GY, Chen ZL, Lu CM,
Li Y, Ping XJ, Huang R. Immunohistochemical study on p53, H-ras/p21,
c-erbB2 protein and
PCNA
expression in HCC tissues of Han and minority ethnic patients. World
J Gastroenterol 2000;6:234-238
Edited
by Ma
JY
| |