|
Lu
Xia, Yao-Zong Yuan, Chun-Di Xu, Yong-Pin Zhang, Ming-Ming Qiao,
Jia-Xu Xu, Department of Gastroenterology, Ruijin Hospital,
Shanghai Second Medical University, Shanghai 200025, China
Correspondence to: Dr.Lu Xia, Department of Gastroenterology,
Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Second Medical University, Shanghai
200025, China. xialu@126.com
Telephone: +86-21-64370045-665242 Fax: +86-21-64150773
Received 2001-09-26 Accepted 2001-10-29
Abstract
AIM: Epidermal growth factor (EGF) plays an important role in
the regulation of gastrointestinal tissue growth and development,
and it can stimulate epithelial proliferation, cell differentiation
and growth. It has been established that the EGF can promote gastric
cytoprotection and ulcer healing. But the potential ability of EGF
to regulate the gastric cancer growth is unknown. This study is to
investigate the influence of EGF on human gastric cancer cell and
the implanted tumor growth of nude mice.
METHODS: The cell growth rates of human gastric adenocarinoma
cell lines MKN-28, MKN-45, SGC-7901 and normal human gastric
epithelial cells 3T3 were assessed when incubated with recombinant
human EGF (rhEGF, 0.05, 0.1, 0.5, 1.0, 10, 50, 100mg.L-1)
using MTT method. The cells of MKN-28, MKN-45, SGC-7901 (gastric
cancer tissue 1.5mm3) were implanted in the BALB/cA nude
mice for 10 days. The EGF was given intraperitoneally (15, 30, 60μg.kg-1)
for 3 weeks. The body weights of the tumor-bearing animals and their
tumor mass were measured afterwards to assess the mitogenic effect
of rhEGF in the nude mice.
RESULTS: Within the concentration range of 0.05-100mg.L-1,
rhEGF could increase the cell growth of normal 3T3 cells (cell
growth rate 100% vs 102.8%, P<0.05), but partially
restrain the gastric cancer cell growth. The latter effect was
related to cell differentiation. In 15-60μg/kg rhEGF groups,
the mean implanted tumor mass of MKN-28 cell were 1.75g, 1.91g,
2.08g/NS group 1.97g (P>0.05), the mean tumor mass of
SGC-7901 cell were 1.53g, 1.07g, 1.20g/NS group 1.07g (P>0.05),
and for MKN-45 cell, the tumor mass were respectively 1.92g, 1.29g,
1.77g/NS group 1.82g(P>0.05). So rhEGF had no obvious
effect on implanted MKN-28, SGC-7901 and MKN-45 tumor growth.
CONCLUSION: EGF has no stimulating effect on the human
gastric cancer cell growth neither in vitro nor in vivo.
Xia L, Yuan YZ, Xu CD, Zhang YP, Qiao MM, Xu JX. Effects of
epidermal growth factor on the growth of human gastric cancer cell
and the implanted tumor of nude mice. World J Gastroenterol
2002;8(3):455-458
INTRODUCTION
Growth factors are found in a variety of adult and embryonic
tissues. They are important regulators of cell differentiation and
proliferation, and play an important role in maintaining the
integrity of the epithelium. They have also been implicated in
malignancy. Epidermal growth factor (EGF), a single-chain
polypeptide of 53 amino acid residues, is found mainly in the
submandibular glands and Brunner's gland of the gastrointestinal
tract. It can be combined with the specific receptor (EGF-R) of the
target cell membrane[1]. Some studies suggested that the
expression of EGF-R was increased in gastric cancer tissue. It was
also reported that EGF can increase the mitosis in vitro[2].
Patients with EGF receptor-positive gastric cancer may have a poorer
prognosis than those with EGF receptor-negative cancers. So, EGF has
the function to influence the tumor cell growth. At present, the
effect of EGF in this process has been unclear yet.
In
this report, we seek to determine the effect of EGF on the growth of
human gastric cancer cell (MKN-28, SGC-7901 and MKN-45) in vitro. In
nude mice which underwent surgical implantation of the same gastric
cancer cells, EGF was injected intraperitoneally to investigate the
influence of EGF on tumor cell growth, so as to confirm the safety
of EGF in the treatment of peptic ulcer[3-14].
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Materials
Gastric cancer cell lines, MKN-28, SGC-7901 and MKN-45, are
well-differentiated, moderate-differentiated and low-differentiated
human adenocarcinoma cell lines respectively. 3T3 cell is normal
human gastric epithlium. They are all established and characterized
in our laboratory. rhEGF was obtained from Institute of Biochemistry
and Cell Biology, Shanghai Institute for Biological Science, Chinese
Academy of Science (100μg/amp). 3-(4,5-dimethylathiazol-2-yl)
and 5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide were the product of Fluda Chemie
AG. Balb/cA nude mice: were obtained from Institute of
Pharmatheutics, Shanghai Institute for Biological Science, Chinese
Academy of Science. 35~40
day old, 18-20g, female. Mitomycin C (MMC) was the product of Kyowa
Hakko, Japan, 2mg/Amp.
Methods
Cell cultures Human gastric cancer cells were propagated as
adherent monolayers and removed from culture surfaces by treatment
with trypsin, then seeded in microwells at 1×108.L-1
in complete medium composed of RPMI 1640 and 200mL.L-1
fetal bovine serum (FBS). The cells were grown in 96-well
microplates of RPMI1640 tissue culture medium supplemented with
200mL.L-1 FBS at 37℃
in a humidified atmosphere of 50mL.L-1 CO2 in
air. After 24h incubation, the cells were then added by rhEGF at the
concentration of 0.05, 0.1,0.5,1.0,10,50,100mg.L-1 for
further incubation of 72 hours. Uninoculated RPMI 1640 medium was
used as a control under otherwise identical experimental procedures.
At the end of cell incubation, cell numbers and their viability were
determined by MTT method. Add MTT(1g.L-1) in each
microwell for 4h in 37℃
air. After centrifugation, 100μL dimethyl sulfoxode (DMSO) was
added into each well for 30 minutes. Absorption rate of treated and
control cells was measured at 570nm (A value) for quantitative
measurement of cell growth. Each test kit contained a positive
control and an additional positive control. Experimental controls
were treated with DMSO only.
Tumor implantation into nude mice Gastric cancer tissue
(1.5mm3) were implanted s.c. in the right dorsal area of
4-6wk old male nude mice. Animals were fed with an autoclaved diet
and tap water (acidified to pH 2.5). After 10d, the animals were
assigned into the rhEGF treatment groups (15,30,60μg.kg-1,
intraperitoneally, 5 times per week for 3wk), negative control group
(saline, 2mL intraperitonium) and positive control group(MMC, 2mg.kg-1,
twice every week, 6 times altogether). The body mass of Balb/cA
tumor-bearing animals and their tumor weights were measured using
anesthesia with ether.
Inhibitory
rate (IR) of tumor growth = m(tumor)C- m(tumor)T/
m(tumor)C(m(tumor)C: mean tumor weight of
negetive control group; m(tumor)T: mean tumor weight of
rhEGF treatment group)
Statistical analysis
Student's t test was performed to assess potentially
significant differences between individual groups of observations.
The test statistics were then compared with values obtained from
standard two-tailed tables. A P value of <5% was accepted as
indicating probable significance when comparing the various groups.
RESULTS
Mitogenic effects of EGF in vitro
We found that EGF had no significant growth-stimulatory
effects on gastric cancer cells in a dose-dependent manner
(Figure 1). The lowest cell growth rates in MKN-28, S-7901 and
MKN-45 cell lines were 81.7%, 80.7% and 86.1% respectively, compared
with the control at the 0.05,50,100mg.L-1 of rhEGF. EGF
could inhibit the cancer cell growth within the level of 0.05 to
100mg.L-1. But there was no probable significance within
the same group. In contrast, for the normal 3T3 cells, EGF could
increase the cell growth significantly after the coincubation (P=0.0008). We also found that the influence of EGF on the gastric
cancer cell growth was dependent on the differentiation of the cell.
Under the same concentration, the inhibition was greater in
well-differentiated cells.
Figure 1(PDF)The
effect of rhEGF on the growth of gastric cancer
Effect of EGF on the implanted tumor in nude mice
The mean tumor weight of negative control group after the
study was 1.97g in MKN-28 nude mice. In MMC treatment group, the
tumor weight was 0.47g (P<0.05). In rhEGF groups (15,30,60μg.kg-1),
the tumor weights were 1.75, 1.91 and 2.08g respectively. The
inhibitory rate were -5.3% to 11.1%, compared with negative control
group. In rhEGF60μg.kg-1 group, the positive data
suggested that the weight was higher than control, but the
difference was not significant. There were no significant difference
compared with the negative control group (Table 1). In S-7901 and
MKN-45 cell lines, the same results found indicated that
intraperinoneal rhEGF treatment could not stimulate the tumor growth
in nude mice within the concentration 15-30μg.kg-1
(Table 2,3).
Table 1 The effect of rhEGF i.p. on the growth of MKN-28
tumor in nude mice
|
Group
|
Dosage
|
n
|
Body
mass/g
|
Tumor
mass mean±SD/g
|
Inhibitary
rate/%
|
P
value
|
|
Beginning
|
End
|
|
NS
|
0.2mL
|
16
|
17.6
|
22.6
|
1.97±0.94
|
----
|
----
|
|
MMC
|
2μg.kg-1
|
8
|
17.8
|
20.0
|
0.47±0.61
|
76.2
|
<0.05
|
|
RhEGF
|
15μg.kg-1
|
8
|
17.4
|
22.0
|
1.75±0.81
|
11.1
|
<0.05
|
|
RhEGF
|
30μg.kg-1
|
8
|
17.9
|
23.8
|
1.91±0.98
|
3.0
|
<0.05
|
|
RhEGF
|
60μg.kg-1
|
8
|
17.9
|
22.9
|
2.08±1.56
|
-5.3
|
<0.05
|
P
value: compared with the NS group.
Table 2 The effect of rhEGF i.p. on the growth of SGC-7901
tumor in nude mice
|
Group
|
Dosage
|
n
|
Body
mass/g
|
Tumor
mass mean±SD/g
|
Inhibitary
rate/%
|
P
value
|
|
Beginning
|
End
|
|
NS
|
0.2mL
|
16
|
14.4
|
25.2
|
1.07±0.60
|
--
|
----
|
|
MMC
|
2μg.kg-1
|
8
|
15.2
|
21.7
|
0.66±0.29
|
38.6
|
<0.05
|
|
RhEGF
|
15μg.kg-1
|
8
|
15.9
|
25.3
|
1.53±0.29
|
-43.8
|
<0.05
|
|
RhEGF
|
30μg.kg-1
|
8
|
14.1
|
23.8
|
1.07±0.63
|
-0.7
|
<0.05
|
|
RhEGF
|
60μg.kg-1
|
8
|
13.4
|
23.9
|
1.20±0.47
|
-12.5
|
<0.05
|
P
value: compared with the NS group.
Table 3 The effect of rhEGF i.p. on the growth of MKN-45
tumor in nude mice
|
Group
|
Dosage
|
n
|
Body
mass/g
|
Tumor
mass mean±SD/g
|
Inhibitary
rate/%
|
P
value
|
|
Beginning
|
End
|
|
NS
|
0.2mL
|
20
|
16.1
|
19.8
|
1.82±0.95
|
--
|
----
|
|
MMC
|
2μg.kg-1
|
10
|
16.2
|
19.7
|
1.07±0.42
|
41.1
|
<0.05
|
|
RhEGF
|
15μg.kg-1
|
10
|
16.0
|
20.3
|
1.92±1.04
|
-5.5
|
<0.05
|
|
RhEGF
|
30μg.kg-1
|
10
|
16.5
|
19.8
|
1.29±0.83
|
8.0
|
<0.05
|
|
RhEGF
|
60μg.kg-1
|
8
|
16.1
|
20.4
|
1.77±1.04
|
3.1
|
<0.05
|
DISCUSSION
We have examined the effect of EGF on the established cell line,
MKN-28, SGC-7901 and MKN-45, derived from human gastric
adenocarcinoma, both in vitro and in vivo. The results may be
somewhat controversy to those formerly reported, that EGF had no
obviously effect on the gastric cancer growth[15,16].
Growth factors are components of signal transduction pathways that
have a considerable spectrum of biological activity, such as control
of cell proliferation, differentiation, apoptosis and transformation[17,18].
Of these growth factors, EGF family are important agents for gastric
mucosa. The EGF family include at least seven mammalian
polypeptides: EGF, TGF-α, amphiregulin (AR), cripto heregulin,
betacellulin and heparin-binding epidermal growth factor (HB-EGF).
Except cripto and heregulin, all of these proteins have been shown
to bind and activate the 170-kilodalton EGF receptor tyrosine kinase[19,20].
They share a similar spectrum of biological activities exerted
through interaction with EGF-R. EGF-R is a transmembrane
glycoprotein, which can stimulate cell proliferation mainly through
induction of the proto-oncogenes c-fos and c-myc, and of molecules
such as polyamines. The TGF can cause morphological transformation
and promote anchorage independent growth in vitro. Although there is
no evidence of TGF secretion from nonneoplastic adult tissue, it is
synthesized during fetal development and produced by many tumor
tissues[21,22]. TGF-α is frequently produced by
malignant as well as normal cells and may stimulate their own
proliferation. However, less is known about the role of EGF in
oncogenesis[23-25]. The importance of growth factors in
the healing and oncogenesis of gastrointestinal diseases has
recently received much attention. In inflamed mucosa, EGF is found
predominantly in the cytoplasm of the superficial epithelial and
isthmus cells, as in the normal mucosa[26]. In addition
to providing a mitogenic stimulus, EGF may also help the
proliferating cells to migrate into the superficial epithelium
during the process of “cytoprotective” epithelial repair[27].
The
development of monoclonal and polyclonal antibodies against EGF has
allowed studies of the localization of EGF in normal and neoplastic
tissues to be performed[28-31]. Immunocytochemical
staining has shown distribution of epidermal growth factor and
transforming growth factor α(TGF-α) in the
gastrointestinal tract with high levels[32-35]. Normal
epithelial cells secrete such growth factors to regulate cell
replacement by autocrine or paracrine mechanisms. It is speculated
that these growth factors may regulate the transition rate between
G2-phase and mitosis of the cell cycle[36]. It has
reported that HB-EGF is mitogenic for some types of cells, such as
fibroblasts, vascular smooth muscle cells, keratinocytes and rat
hepatocytes, but not endothelial cells[37].
The
mitogenic action of EGF and TGF-α in vitro has been reported in
many gastrointestinal tissues, including esophagus, stomach and
intestine, and there i s little information about the association
between the mucosal expression of these peptides and indices of
cellular proliferation in vivo[38]. It was
reported that EGF immunoreactivity was present in 26-37% of gastric
cancers, and the presence of EGF in gastric cancer correlated with
the degree of gastric wall invasion, lymph node metastasis and
disease progression[39-42]. Although the epidermal growth
factor/receptor system has been found abnormal in intestinal type
gastric cancer, overexpression of EGF-R, erbB-2 and erbB-3 receptor
genes was mainly found. There has been some controversy in the
literature whether EGF-R overexpression related to tumor progression
or to early stages of gastric carcinogenesis[43-46]. The
study had shown that overexpression of the EGF-R gene was infrequent
in the metaplastic gastric mucosa. A major problem in gastric
carcinogenesis is to determine the changing point from benign pre-neoplastic
lesions to malignancy. There is a general agreement that this
process involves different steps in cellular changes, requiring both
activation and inhibition of specific genes, but there is still no
evidence to support EGF or EGF-R overexpression to be a reliable
marker of increased cancer risk in patients[47-50]. The
present study has sought to clarify their effect on the growth of
gastric cancer cell in vitro and in vivo. In this study, we have
found that there was no effect of EGF on the growth of established
cell lines, MKN-28, SGC-7901, MKN-45, derived from human gastric
adenocarcinoma, both in vitro and in vivo. Further study is headed
to elucidate whether EGF could cause abnormal differentiation of the
cells during the treatment of peptic ulcer for a long period.
REFERENCES
1 Playford
RJ, Wright NA. Why is epidermal growth factor present in the gut
lumen. Gut 1996;38:303-305
2 Maehiro
K, Watanabe S, Hirose M, Iwazaki R, Miwa H, Sato N. Effects of
epidermal growth factor and insulin on
migration
and proliferation of primary cultured rabbit gastric epithelial
cells. Gastroenterology 1997;32:573-578
3 Chen BW,
Wang HT, Liu ZX, Jie BQ, Ma QJ. Effect of exogenous EGF on proto-oncogene
expression in experimental
gastric
ulcer in rats. Shijie Huaren Xiaohua Zazhi 1999;7:504-509
4 Fiorucci
S, Lanfrancone L, Santucci L, Calabro A, Orsini B, Federici B,
Morelli A. Epidermal growth factor modulates
pepsinogen
secretion
in guinea pig gastric chief cells. Gastroenterology 1996;111:945-958
5 Konturek
PC, Brzozowski T, Konturek SJ, Ernst H, Drozdowicz D, Pajdo R, Hahn
EG. Expression of epidermal growth
factor alpha
during
ulcer healing. Scand J Gastroenterol 1997; 32:6-15
6 Konturek
PC, Ernst H, Brzozowski T. Expression of epidermal growth factor and
transforming growth factor α after
exposure of
rat
gastric mucosa to stress. Scand J Gastroenterol 1996;31:209-216
7 Hu YT,
Zhen CE, Xing GZ, Zhang ML, Zhang JS, Wang DX, Lu YM. Relationship
between transforming growth factor
alpha,
epidermal
growth factor and prostagladin E2 in patients with peptic ulcer.
Shijie Huaren Xiaohua Zazhi
2002;10:43-47
8 Konturek
JW, Hengst K, Konturek SJ, Domschke W. Epidermal growth factor in
gastric ulcer healing by nocloprost, a
stable
prostaglandin
E2 derivative. Scand J Gastroenterol 1997;32:980-984
9 Kang JY,
Teng CH, Chen FC. Effect of capsaicin and cimetidine on the healing
of acetic acid induced gastric ulceration
in the rat.
Gut
1996;38:832-836
10 Furukawa O, Okabe S.
Cytoprotective effect of epidermal growth factor on acid-and
pepsin-induced damage to rat
gastric
epithelial
cells:roles of Na+/H+ exchangers. J Gastroenterol Hepatol
1997;12:353-359
11 Arakawa T, Watanabe
T, Fukuda T, Higuchi K, Takaishi O, Yamasaki K, Kobayashi K ,
Tarnawski A. Indomethacin
treatment
during
initial period of acetic acid-induced rat gastric ulcer healing
promotes persistent polymorphonuclear
cell-infiltration and
increases future ulcer recurrence. Dig Dis Sci 1996;41:2055-2061
12 Qiu BS,Pfeiffer
CJ,Wu W,Cho CH.Tungstic acid reduction of cold-resistant
stress-induced ulceration in rats.
J
Gastroenterol Hepatol 1997;12:19-23
13 Blandizzi C,
Gherardi G, Marveggio C, Lazzeri G, Natale G, Carignani D, Colucci
R, Tacca MD. Suramin inhances
ethanol-induced
infury
to gastric mucosa in rats. Dig Dis Sci 1997;42:1233-1241
14 Miyazaki Y, Hiraoka
S, Tsutsui S, Kitamura S, Shinomura Y, Matsuzawa Y. Epidermal growth
factor receptor mediates
stress
induced
expression of its ligands in rat gastric epithelial cells.
Gastrointerol 2001;120:108-116
15 Ross JS, McKenna BJ.
The HER-2/neu oncogene in tumors of the gastrointestinal tract.
Cancer Invest 2001;19:554-568
16 Wang LD, Wilson EJ,
Osburn J, Delvalle J. Epidermal growth factor inhibits carbachol-stimulated
canine parietal cell
function
via
protein kinase C. Gastroenterology 1996;110:469-477
17 Wagner S, Beil W,
Westermann J, Logan R, Bock CT, Trautwein C, Bleck JS, Manns MP.
Regulation of gastric epithelial
cell growth
by
Helicobactor pylori:evidence for a major role of apoptosis.
Gastroenterology 1997;113:1836-1847
18 Messa C, Russo F,
Pricci M, Di Leo A. Epidermal growth factor and 17beta-estradiol
effects on proliferation of a human
gastric
cancer
cell line(AGS).Scand J Gastroenterol 2000;35:753-758
19 Granelli P, Fichera
G, Zennaro F, Siadi C, Ruberto FD, Fregoni F, Appierto V, Buffa R,
Ferrero S, Biunno I. Expression of
the
pidermal
growth factor receptor gene in human intestinal metaplasia: a
preliminary report. Scand J Gastroenterol
1997;32:485-489
20 Naef M, Yokoyama M,
Friess H, Buchler MW, Korc M. Co-expression of heparin-binding EGF-like
growth factor and
related
peptides in
human gastric carcinoma. Int J Cancer 1996;66:315-321
21
Chen DL, Wang WZ,Wang
JY. Epidermal growth factor prevents gut atrophy and maintains
intestinal integrity in rats
with acute
pancreatitis.
World J Gastroenterol 2000;6:762-765
22 Seno M, Tada H,
Kosaka M, Sasada R, Igarashi K, Shing Y, Folkman J, Ueda M, Yamada
H. Human beatcellulin, a
member of the EGF
family
dominantly expressed in pancreas and small intestine, is fully
active in a monomeric form.
Growth Factors 1996;13:181-191
23 Becker KF, Keller G,
Hoefler H. The use of molecular biology in dagnosis and prognosis of
gastric cancer. Surg Oncol
2000;9:5-11
24 Werner M, Becker KF,
Keller G, Hofler H. Gastric adenocaricnoma:pathomorphology and
molecular pathology.
J
Cander Res Clin Oncol 2001;127:207-216
25 Masaki T, Hatanaka
Y, Nishioka M, Tokuda M, Shiratori Y, Reginfo W, Omata M. Activation
of epidermal growth factor
receptor
kinase
in gastric carcinoma: a preliminary study. Am J Gastroenterol
2000;95:2135-2136
26 Sanz-Ortega J,
Steinberg SM, Moro E, Saez M, Lopez JA, Sierra E, Sanz-Esponera J,
Merino MJ. Comparative study of
tumor
angiogenesis
and immunohistochemistry for p53, c-ErbB2, c-myc and EGFr as
prognostic factors in gastric cancer.
Histol
Histopathol 2000;15:455-462
27 Ma L, Liu ES, Chow
JY, Wang JY, Cho CH. Interactions of EGF and ornithine decarboxylase
activity in the regulation of
gastric
mucus
synthesis in cigarette smoke exposed rats. Zhonghua Binglixue Zazhi
1999;42:137-143
28 Pelaez BM, Ruibal
MA, Aza GJ. Gastric carcinoma: expression of c-erbB-2/neu
oncoprotein, epidermal growth factor
receptor,
cathepsin
D, progesterone receptor and tumor associated glycoprotein-72 in
different histological types.Rev
Esp Enferm Dig
1999;91:826-837
29 Choi JH, Kim HC, Lim
HY, Nam DK, Kim HS, Yi SY, Shim KS, Han WS. Detection of
transforming growth factor-alpha in
the serum
of
gastric carcinoma patients. Oncology 1999;57:236-241
30 Hirao T, Sawada H,
Koyama F, Watanabe A, Yamada Y, Sakaguchi T, Tatsumi T, Fujimoto H,
Emoto K, Narikiyo M,
Oridate N,
Nakano
H. Antisense epidermal growth factor receptor delivered by
adenoviral vector blocks tumor growth in
human gastric cancer.
Cancer
Gene Ther 1999;6:423-427
31 Hosokawa N, Yamamoto
S, Uehara Y, Hori M, Tsuchiya KS. Effect of thiazinotrienomycin B,
an ansamycin antibiotic, on
the function
of
epidermal growth factor receptor in human stomach tumor cells. J
Antibiot 1999;52:485-490
32 Luan F, Wang M, You
W. The correlation of TGF-alpha, EGFR in precancerous lesions and
carcinoma of stomach with
PCNA
expression.
Zhonghua Binglixue Zazhi 1997;26:31-34
33 Koyama S, Maruyama
Y, Adachi S. Expression of epidermal growth factor receptor and CD44
splicing variants sharing
exons 6
and
9 on gastric and esophageal carcinomas: a two-color flow-cytometric
analysis. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol
1999;125:47-54
34 Wang Q, Wu JS, Gao
DM, Lai DN, Ma QJ. Expression significance of epidermal growth
factor receptor and transforming
growth
factor
α mRNA in human colorectal carcinoma. Shijie Huaren Xiaohua
Zazhi 1999;7:590-592
35 Hu X, Gao J, Li Y.
The amounts of inositol 1,4,5-triphosphate and it response to
epidermal growth factor and laminin of
carcinoma
substrains
with high or low metastatic potentials. Zhonghua Yixue Zazhi
1997;77:665-667
36 Tsugawa K, Yonemura
Y, Hirono Y, Fushida S, Kaji M, Miwa K, Miyazaki I, Yamamoto H.
Amplification of the c-met,
c-erbB-2 and
epidermal
growth factor receptor gene in human gastric cancers: correlation to
clinical features. Oncology
1998;55:475-481
37 Slesak B,
Harlozinska A, Porebska I, Bojarowski T, Lapinska J, Rzeszutko M,
Wojnar A. Expression of epidermal growth
factor receptor
family
proteins (EGFR, c-erbB-2 and c-erbB-3) in gastric cancer and chronic
gastritis. Anticancer Res
1998;18:2727-2732
38 Murakami N, Fukuchi
S, Takeuchi K, Hori T, Shibamoto S, Ito F. Antagonistic regulation
of cell migration by epidermal
growth factor
and
glucocorticoid in human gastric carcinoma cells. J Cell Physiol
1998;176:127-137
39 Romano M, Ricci V,
Popolo AD, Sommi P, Blanco CD, Bruni CB, Ventura U, Cover TL, Blaser
MJ, Coffey RJ, Zarrilli R.
Helicobacter
pylori upregulates expression of epidermal growth factor-related
peptides, but inhibits their proliferative
effect
in MKN 28 gastric mucosal cells. J Clin Invest 1998; 101:1604-1613
40 Ishikawa T, Ichikawa
Y, Tarnawski A, Fujiwara Y, Fukuda T, Arakawa T, Mitsuhashi M,
Shimada H. Indomethacin
interferes with
EGF-induced
activation of ornithine decarboxylase in gastric cancer cells.
Digestion 1998;59:47-52
41 Gao JH, Liang HJ,
Liu WW, Fang DC, Wang ZH. Expression of C-myc gene protein and
epidermal growth factor receptor
in gastric
mucosa
pre-and post- Helicobacter pylori clearance. Shijie Huaren Xiaohua
Zazhi 1999;7:1018-1019
42 Zarrilli R, Ricci V,
Romano M. Molecular response of gastric epithelial cells to
Helicobacter pylori-induced cell damage.
Cell
Microbiol 1999;1:93-99
43
He Y, Zhou J,Wu JS,Dou
KF. Inhibitory effects of EGFR antisense oligodeoxynucleotide in
human colorectal cancer cell
line.
World
J Gastroenterol 2000;6:747-749
44 Masaki T, Hatanaka
Y, Nishioka M, Tokuda M, Shiratori Y, Reginfo W, Omata M. Activation
of epidermal growth factor
receptor
kinase
in gastric carcinoma: a preliminary study. Am J Gastroenterol
2000;95:2135-2136
45 Uribeb JM, Barrett
KE. Nonmitogenic actions of growth factors: An integrated view of
their role in intestinal physiology
and
pathophysiology.
Gastroenterology 1997;112:225-268
46 Murayama Y, Miyagawa
JI, Higashiyama S, Kondo S, Yabu M, Isozaki K, Kayanoki Y, Kanayama
S, Shinomura Y,
Taniguchi N,
Matsuzawa
Y. Localization of heparin-binding epidermal growth factor in human
gastric mucosa.
Gastroenterology
1995;109:1051-1059
47 Filipe MI, Osborn M,
Linehan J, Sanidas E, Brito MJ, Jankowski J. Expression of
transforming growth factor alpha,
epidermal growth
factor receptor and epidermal growth factor in precursor lesions to
gastric carcinoma. British J
Cancer 1995;71:30-36
48 Yashi W, Oue N,
Kuniyasu H, Ito R, Tahara E, Yokozaki H. Molecular diagnosis of
gastric cancer:present and future.
Gastric
Cancer 2001;4:113-121
49 Saikawa Y, Kubota T,
Otani Y, Kitajima M, Modlin IM. Cyclin D1 antisense oligonucleotide
inhibits cell growth stimulated
by
epidermal
growth factor and induces apotosis of gastric cancer cells. Jpn J
Cancer Res 2001;92:1102-1109
50 Garcia I, Vizoso F,
Andicoechea A, Raigoso P, Verez P, Alexandre E, Garcia-Muniz JL,
Allende MT. Clinical significance
of epidermal
growth
factor receptor content in gastric cancer. Int J Biol Markers
2001;16:183-188
Edited
by Zhang
JZ
| |