| P.O.Box 2345, Beijing 100023,China | World J Gastroenterol 2002 December 15;8(6):1098-1102 |
| Email: wcjd@public.bta.net.cn | WJG ISSN 1007-9327 CN 14-1219/ R |
| http:// www.wjgnet.com | Copyright © 2002 by The WJG Press |
PELA microspheres loaded H. pylori lysates and their mucosal immune response
Jian-Min Ren, Quan-Ming Zou, Fu-Kun Wang, Qiang He, Wei Chen, Wen-Kun Zen
Jian-Min Ren, Quan-Ming Zou,
Fu-Kun Wang, Wen-Kun Zen, Faculty of
Medical Laboratory Science, Third Military Medical University, Chongqing 400038,
China
Qiang He, Wei Chen,
Department of Radiology, southwest Hospital, Third Military Medical University,
Chongqing 400038, China
Correspondence to:
Jian-Min Ren, Faculty of Medical Laboratory Science, Third Military Medical
University, Chongqing, 400038, China. renjianmin123@sina.com
Telephone:
+86-23-68753046 Fax: +86-23-68753046
Received
2001-08-24 Accepted 2001-09-05
Abstract
AIM: To prepare poly (D,L-lactide)-polyethylene
glycol copolymer (PELA) microspheres loaded H.pylori lysates or
Cystografin and observe their targeting in gastrointestinal mucous membrane
or analyze the mucosal immune responses by oral administration.
METHODS:
PELA microspheres loaded H.pylori lysates or Cystografin were prepared
by double emulsion evaporation method. Their distribution in gastrointestinal
mucous membrane was observed by CT.Balb/c mice orally immunized in mucosal
immune responses, whose antibody production in salivary and gut washing and
antibody secreting cells in Peyer's patches
(PP) were estimated by ELISA and ELISPOT, respectively. The
microspheres?physical properties, such as particle size, protein level and
morphology were investigated.
RESULTS: All
prepared microspheres were found to have a smooth surface morphology from
3.20-4.05 mm in diameter and high encapsulation efficiency from 74.9-82.2 %. No
significant correlation in their physical properties was shown,depending on
their molecular weight at the similar composition ratio. Immunization with all
types of PELA-Hp microspheres elevated the saliva sIgA level at week 3 by
approximately 3-4 times that with soluble antigen, which was greatly enhanced
after boosting. At one week after last immunization with all types of PELA-Hp
microspheres (week 8), the specific sIgA-ASCs, IgG-ASCs and sIgA in salivary
rose obviously. In intestinal Peyer抯 patches,
the specific sIgA-ASCs were 5.92-6.98×104/ml cell and IgG-ASCs were 3.47-4.02×104/ml
cell, about 5-9 times higher than those with soluble antigen (P<0.01).
ASCs in intestine were more than those in stomach and the majority of the ASCs
were sIgA-ASCs. The sIgA in gut washing fluid was 1.62-1.85 OD, about 3-6 times
tthat of those with soluble antigen. There were significant differences of the
ASCs and sIgA in gut washing fluid as compared with those of PBS and MS-0 (P<0.05).
There appeared to be good correlation between sIgA level in gut washing fluid
and sIgA-ASCs in intestinal Peyer's patches.
CONCLUSION:
PELA microspheres may be used as vehicle to delivery antigen and adjuvant in
designing oral vaccination.
Ren JM, Zou QM, Wang FK, He Q, Chen W, Zen WK. PELA microspheres loaded H.
pylori lysates and their mucosal immune response. World J Gastroenterol 2002;
8(6):1098-1102
INTRODUCTION
Helicobacter pylori (Hp)
is a major pathogen causing type B gastritis, peptic ulcer and mucosa-associated
lymphoid tissue gastric lymphoma[1-12]. A triple antimicrobial
therapy is often adopted for patients with infection[13-16], for Hp
reinfection easily occurs and the drug resistance strains are increasing,
therefore, antimicrobial treatment may be ineffective in prevention of
reinfection[17-21]. Oral immunization is considered a convenient and
safe method to induce mucosal immunity against infection. This has become a
focus topic among the researchers[22-26].
The biodegradable and
biocompatible microsphere as a vaccine delivery vehicle has many advantages[26].
The biodegradable polyesters (including polylactic acid (PLA), polyglycolic acid
(PGA) and their copolymers (PLGA)) had been widely studied and used in
biomedical engineering[27-30]. For hydrophobicity of the PLA and the
PLGA, this type of material is usually not desirable for protein and peptide.
Their degraded products, lactic acids or glycolic acids will create a local
acidic environment that may be harmful to the surrounding tissues[31].
These microspheres loaded vaccines can be rapidly captured by phagocyte in the
reticulo-endothelial system, while the microspheres (nanospheres) prepared with
PLA-PEG-PLA (type A-B-A) triblock copolymers, which was produced by
copolymerization of hydrophilic polyethylene glycol with lactide, showed longer
circulating half life of the proteins in vivo[32]. They can
overcome the disadvantages of the PLA or PLGA microspheres as drug vehicle.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Bacterial culture
Hp971023,
Hp980706, HpM bacterial strains were isolated by our laboratory.
The strains were inoculated onto blood plat in the microaerobic cultivation at
37 ℃
for 48 h. The organisms were washed 3 times with 0.15 mol/L phosphate buffered
saline (PBS, pH7.4) and were harvested by centrifugation at 5 000rpm for 10
minutes at 4 ℃.
The resulting suspensions was added to 0.15 mol/L PBS(pH7.4), EDTA 0.65 g/L and
phenylmethylsufonyl fluoride (PMSF) 1 mmol/L and sonicated (200W×30s×10
times). The Hp lysate was collected by centrifugation at 12 000
rpm for 20 minutes. The protein concentration was determined by UV
spectrophotometer (Beckman DU-640, USA).
Preparation of the PELA microspheres loaded Hp
PELA (weight ratio of D, L-lactide
to PEG-2000, 95:5; the inherent viscosity of the PELA ranged from 0.1271 to
0.3329 dL/g measured in tetrahydrofuran at 25 ℃)
was synthesized according to procedures described in literature[32].
The PELA microspheres loaded Hp were manufactured using double emulsion
evaporation method as describled[32,33]. One ml aqueous
solution mixed 4 % Hp lysate (inter-water phase) was emulsified
with 10 ml of 6 % (w/v) PELA in methylene chloride using T25B homogenizer (USA)
at 8 000 rpm for 5 min (w/o), After homogenization, 30 ml aqueous solution of 2
% PVA(degree of polymerization n = 1 500-1 800) was added to the primary
water-in oil (w/o) emulsion and the stirring was continued further for 5 min.
The resulting w/o/w suspensions were stirred magnetically at 1 200 rpm for 10-12
h at room temperature (over 25℃)
to evaporate the solvent. The microspheres were obtained by centrifugation and
washed three to eight times with distilled water. The cleaned microspheres were
lyophilized and stored at 4 ℃
under desiccation. If the aqueous solution mixed Hp lysate
(inter-water phase) was replaced by pure water or some concentration of cystografin,
the blank PELA microspheres and PELA-cystografin microspheres can be
obtained respectively. The amount of protein loaded in the PELA microspheres was
determined by dissolving a fixed amount of microspheres in methylene chloride,
the protein content was measured with UV spectrophotometer (Beckman DU-640,
USA). The protein loading efficiency was calculated directly by recovering the
protein from the microspheres[34].
Measurement of microsphere size and
morphology
The mean size of microspheres
and distribution were calculated using a LeitzDiaplan light microscope (Wild
MPS52, Japan) to measure the diameter of microspheres, whose amount was no less
than 200. The surface structure of micropheres was examined by scanning electron
microscopy (AMRAY, USA-China).
PELA-cystografin microspheres
targeting
Miniture pigs (sus scorfa
domestica) weighing 15-20 kg were used in the study. PELA-cystografin
microspheres (mean diameter of 3.72 mm,
the amount of cystografin loaded was about 16 %) were suspended in 7.5 %
sodium bicarbonate solution and 100 ml suspension (10 g PELA-cystografin
microspheres) was orally administered by intubation feeding to miniture pigs.
After 0, 3, 8 and 15 days, the distribution of PELA-cystografin
microspheres in the all gastrointestinal tract was observed by CT. The pigs were
killed and the images of all gastrointestinal tract were taken after being
washed up.
Immunization procedures
BALB/c mice (female, 6-8 weeks old,
and 18-25 g in weight) were offered by our experimental animal center. Mice were
randomly assigned to one of the seven immunization groups (twenty mice per
group). Before administration, mice stopped feeding for 2 h and then took orally
0.5 ml mixture of the Hanks'equilibration salt and 7.5 % sodium bicarbonate
solution (4:1 ratio) in order to neutralize gastric acid fluids. Each
experimental group was orally immunized on week 0, 1 and 2. The immunized mice
were given a booster immunization on week 7 with the same agents as the primary
immunization. The first four groups were immunized by oral administration with
different PELA-Hp microspheres (that is MS-1, MS-2, MS-3 and MS-4 group,
1mg Hp per mouse). The fifth group, sixth and seventh group of mice
received free 1 mg of souble Hp lysate antigen, PBS solution or
blank PELA microspheres under similar conditions, respectively. One week after
the last immunizations (week 8), mice were killed and assayed by indirect ELISA
and ELISPOT.
Detection of ASCs in lymphocytes from
intestine and gastric mucosa
Peyer抯 patches
(PP) in intestine and gastric mucosa were selected[35] and placed
into 0.5 ml 5 % FCS RPMI-1640 medium. The tissues were ground and recovered on
70 mm
cell strainer. The recovered tissues were harvested by centrifugation at 1
500rpm for 15 minutes and washed two times to collect suspensions, which were
added 15 ml 70 % Percoll medium and centrifuged at 1500rpm for 15 minutes. Cell
pellets are resuspended in 0.5 ml RPMI-1640 medium to form 5×105/ml. The cell suspensions were stained with 2 %
trypan blue. The cell viability and purity were assessed. The ELISPOT assay[36]
was used to detect ASCs in the intestine and gastric tissues of the mice.
Briefly, 96-well (Millipore) were coated with 0.2 ml H. pylori
sonicate preparations dissolved in 0.05 mol/L sodium bicarbonate solution (50 mg
protein per well) and left overnight at 4 ℃.
After washed three times in PBS, well plates were saturated with 2 % BSA (100 ml
per well) and incubated at 37 ℃
for 1 hour. The plates were washed once in RPMI-1640 and each well was added 0.2
ml 5×105/ml of the cell suspensions.
The cells were incubated at 37 ℃
in 10 % CO2 for 4 hours. The plates were washed three times in PBS-Tween
and then added 100 ml biotinylated monoclonal IgA or IgG antibodies to specific
mouse , which had been diluted 1:1500 and 1:2000 in 10 % FCS-PBS, respectively.
The plates were incubated at 37 ℃
for 2 hours. After three washes, the avidinperoxidase solution, diluted 1:2 000
in PBS, was incubated at 37℃
for 30 minutes. After three washes in PBS-Tween, 100 ml
substrate solution (containing 7.5 % gelatin, 1 g/L 3,3'
5,5'tetramethylbenzidine (TMB), 0.03 % H2O2) was added to
each well. The reaction was coagulated quickly in ice-water bath. After 10-30
minutes, the immunospots were counted under inverted microscope (Olymps, Tokyo,
Japan). The number of ASC was the mean number of immunospots deducting the mean
number of each contrast.
Assay of saliva sIgA and gut sIgA by
ELISA
Saliva was collected from immunized
mice[37]. Gut washing fluids was collected after the last
immunization one week (week 8). Each well was coated with 100 ml
of H. pylori lasate solution at concentration of 50 mg/ml
in 0.05 mol/L sodium carbonate- bicarbonate buffer (pH 9.6) overnight at 4 ℃.
After suction and three washes in PBS-Tween, 100 ml
of 2 % BSA solution in PBS was added to each well and further incubated for
1hour at 37 ℃.
The initial dilution of sample (saliva and gut washing fluids) was 1:20. 100 ml
diluted samples was added to wells and incubated for 1hour at 37 ℃.
After three washes in PBS-Tween, 100 ml
of biotinylated goat anti-mouse IgA incubated for 1hour at 37 ℃.
After washing three times with PBS-Tween, 100 ml
of the avidinperoxidase solution was added and incubated for 1 hour at 37 ℃.
Then washed and added 100 ml substrate solution. The plates were incubated for
20 minutes at 37 ℃.
The reaction was stopped by addition of 100 ml
of 0.5 mol/L hydrochloric acid, and the color development was measured by plate
reader set at 405 nm.
Statistical analysis
Data were analyzed using Student's
t test. Results were expressed as
mean±standard error. Differences were considered significant for values P<0.05.
RESULTS
Properties and morphology of PELA-Hp
microspheres
The properties of PELA-Hp
microspheres prepared with different inherent viscosity of PELA (ranged from
0.1271-0.3329 dL/g) are shown in Table 1. The properties of microspheres were
examined under light microscope in particle size and by UV spectrophotometer in
protein loading and encapsulation efficiency. The morphology of microspheres was
examined under scanning electron microscopy. The morphology of MS-2 is shown
Figure 1.
Table 1
The properties of the PELA-Hp microspheres
| Lot | PELA[h](dL/g)* | Mean dimeter(mm) | Protein (%,w/w) | loading Encapsulation efficiency (%,w/w) |
| MS-1 | 0.1271 | 3.87 | 5.06 | 77.6 |
| MS-2 | 0.2083 | 3.20 | 5.53 | 82.2 |
| MS-3 | 0.3054 | 3.53 | 5.40 | 74.9 |
| MS-4 | 0.3329 | 4.05 | 5.27 | 79.5 |
*The inherent viscosity of PELA
is measured in tetrahydrofuran at 25 ℃.
Figure 1 Scanning
electron micrographs of MS-2 loaded Hp.
PELA-cystografin microsphere
targeting
The images of the miniature
pig by oral administration with PELA-cystografin microsphere were
observed by CT. The experiment could indirectly obtain the distribution of PELA
microsphere in all gastrointestinal tract as time (day). The results suggested
that PELA-cystografin microsphere mainly was distributed in the gastric
cavity and at the surface of gastric mucosa after oral administration for three
days. Then part of the microspheres gradually moved to enter the intestine by
the stomach peristalsis and adhered to their surface (images not shown). After
15 days, the microspheres were found mainly distributed at the surface of
intestine. The images are shown Figure 2.
Figure 2
Images of pig stomach and gut after oral administration.
(a) blank PELA
microsphere;
(b) PELA-cystografin microsphere.
Mucosal immune responses of orally
immunized PELA-Hp microspheres
Saliva sIgA responses after
oral immunization with soluble antigen, PELA-Hp microspheres with
different inherent viscosities of PELA (ranged from 0.1271 to 0.3329 dL/g) were
measured at week 3, week 5 and week 8 (Table 2). Immunization with soluble
antigen induced weak saliva IgA antibodies. Immunization with all types of PELA-Hp
microspheres elevated saliva sIgA level at week 3 (approximately 3-4 times
higher than those with soluble antigen ) and greatly enhanced after boosting
(week 8). The changes of saliva sIgA at different stages after oral immunization
related to the properties of PELA.
Table 2
Comparison of sIgA titres in saliva at different stages after oral immunization
(x±s)
| Groups | Week 3 | Week 5 | Week 8 |
| PBS | 0.081±0.026 | 0.074±0.023 | 0.080±0.011 |
| Ag | 0.197±0.177 | 0.199±0.093 | 0.225±0.029 |
| MS-0 | 0.090±0.041 | 0.071±0.013 | 0.110±0.046 |
| MS-1 | 0.416±0.183 | 0.567±0.136 | 0.891±0.215 |
| MS-2 | 0.399±0.179 | 0.608±0.209 | 0.882±0.264 |
| MS-3 | 0.346±0.126 | 0.674±0.128 | 0.957±0.238 |
| MS-4 | 0.304±0.105 | 0.523±0.211 | 0.944±0.143 |
At one week after last
immunization with all types of PELA-Hp microspheres (week 8), the
specific sIgA-ASCs,IgG-ASCs and sIgA were estimated by ELISPOT and ELISA.The
results are shown in Table 3.
Table 3
Immune response induced with PELA-Hp microspheres at week 8 (n=20,
x±s)
| Groups | PP sIgA-ASCs | (1?04) IgG-ASCs | Stomach sIgA-ASCs | (1?03) IgG-ASCs | Gut sIgA |
| PBS | 0.13±0.04 | 0.16±0.07 | 0.19±0.08 | 0.23±0.06 | 0.234±0.08 |
| Ag | 0.27±0.11 | 0.29±0.09 | 0.35±0.11 | 0.36±0.15 | 0.34±0.17 |
| MS-0 | 0.16±0.07 | 0.17±0.05 | 0.15±0.06 | 0.21±0.07 | 0.25±0.08 |
| MS-1 | 6.58±1.38 | 3.78±0.82 | 4.17±1.09 | 0.74±0.29 | 1.75±1.46 |
| MS-2 | 6.92±1.77 | 4.02±0.93 | 3.80±1.34 | 1.02±0.44 | 1.85±1.38 |
| MS-3 | 6.77±1.46 | 3.56±1.10 | 4.12±0.83 | 1.81±0.73 | 1.62±1.81 |
| MS-4 | 5.92±1.92 | 3.47±0.82 | 3.65±1.04 | 1.88±0.23 | 1.71±1.70 |
DISCUSSION
The relationship between the properties
of PELA-Hp microspheres and molecular weight of PELA copolymer are shown
Table 1. All types of PELA-Hp microspheres prepared with the same
component PELA, whose protein loading, encapsulation efficiency and size were
5.06-5.40 %, 74.9-82.2 % and 3.20-4.05 mm, respectively, were not significantly
different This confirmed the previous investigations[38]. Morphology
of PELA microspheres using double emulsion evaporation method were investigated
under sanning electron microscopy. The obtained microspheres were all spherical,
homogeneous particles and had smooth surface (as shown in Figure 1). The results
coincided with the report of SY Kim et al[39], while Kofler et
al[40] reported that the microspheres were porous particles with
a rough surface. This is likely that different processing and manufacturing
conditions of microspheres (such as o/wout-water phase, winter-water
phase /o, stirring velocity, temperature etc), which result in
morphologies of microspheres.
The images of the miniature
pigs by oral administration of PELA-cystografin microspheres are shown in
Figure 2. This indirectly clarified the conclusion arrived by Eldridge et al[41],
which was that microspheres (mean diameter <10 mm) after oral administration
firstly adhered to the surface of the gastrointestinal mucous membrane, then
arrived at their Peyer抯 patches
(PP) to induce mucosal and systemic immune responses. Therefore, our obtained
microspheres (mean diameter <5 mm) could induce mucosal and systemic immune
responses by particle uptake into the PP. After oral administration, all types
of PELA-Hp microspheres (week 8), the specific sIgA-ASCs, IgG-ASCs and
sIgA in gut washing fluids obviously rose by ELISA and ELISPOT. The specific
sIgA-ASCs and IgG-ASCs were approximately 5-9 times that with soluble antigen.
ASCs in the intestine were more than those in stomach, and the majority of the
ASCs were sIgA-ASCs. This result indicated that there appeared to be a good
correlation between sIgA level in gut washing fluid and sIgA-ASCs in intestinal
PP. The sIgA in gut washing fluid was about 3-6 times higher than those with
soluble antigen (as shown in Table 3), that is very important for oral
immunization to effectively induce mucosal immune response and protect against Hp
infection[21,35]. The protein release of PELA-Hp microspheres
was influenced by several parameters including PELA copolymer molecular weight,
diameter, the ratio of lactide/PEG and the manufacturing technology.
Immunization with all types of PELA-Hp microspheres elevated the saliva
sIgA level at week 3 (approximately 3-4 times higher than those with soluble
antigen ) and greatly enhanced after boosting (week 8) (Table 2). At the same
components of PELA (feed ratio of lactide/PEG=95:5 in this study), after oral
immunization for 3 weeks, mice with PELA-Hp microspheres prepared with
lower molecular weight of PELA , the saliva sIgA level became higher than the
mice with PELA-Hp microspheres prepared with higher molecular weight of
PELA. However, after oral immunization for 8 weeks, there was no
differences in antibody production level between those formulations. This result
can be explained as follows: the initial burst release of Hp was bigger
from PELA-Hp microspheres prepared with lower molecular weight PELA,
meanwhile because low molecular weight of PELA was degraded easily and can not
effectively protect Hp release from microspheres (t1/2 was short)[36],
this means that mice orally immunized with PELA-Hp microspheres prepared
with lower molecular weight PELA induced stronger mucosal and systemic immune
responses after oral immunization in earlier stages. All types of PELA-Hp
microspheres (h=0.1271-0.3329 dL/g PELA, 1-2 month degradation in vitro)
were degraded fully and released encapsulated antigens at week 8 irrespective of
differences of copolymer molecular weights. We also found in this study that
antigen release from microspheres can be controlled and accommodated by
dictating the component and molecular weight of polymer. This will play an
important role in designing oral vaccines for the protection against diseases in
the future.
REFERENCES
1 Sepulveda AR,
Graham DY. Role of Helicobacter pylori in gastric carcinogenesis. Gastroenterol
Clin North
Am 2002; 31: 517-535
2 Vandenplas Y. Helicobacter pylori infection. World J
Gastroenterol 2000; 6: 20-31
3 Nakamura S, Aoyagi K, Furuse M, Suekane H, Matsumoto T,
Yao T, Sakai Y, Fuchigami T, Yamamoto I, Tsuneyoshi
M, Fujishima M. B-cell monoclonality precedes the
development of gastric MALT lymphoma in Helicobacter pylori-
associated chronic gastritis. Am J Pathol 1998; 152:
1271-1279
4 Hiyama T, Haruma K, Kitadai Y, Miyamoto M, Tanaka S,
Yoshihara M, Sumii K, Shimamoto F, Kajiyama G. B-cell
monoclonality in Helicobacter pylori-associated
chronic atrophic gastritis. Virchows Arch 2001; 438: 232-237
5 Wu C, Zou QM, Guo H, Yuan XP, Zhang WJ, Lu DS, Mao XH.
Expression, purification and immuno-characteristics
of recombination UreB protein of H. pylori. World
J Gastroenterol 2001; 7:389-393
6 Miyamoto M, Haruma K, Hiyama T, Kamada T, Masuda H,
Shimamoto F, Inoue K, Chayama K. High incidence of
B-cell monoclonality in follicular gastritis: a
possible association between follicular gastritis and MALT lymphoma. Virchows
Arch 2002; 440: 376-380
7 Wildner-Christensen M, Touborg Lassen A, Lindebjerg J,
Schaffalitzky De Muckadell OB. Diagnosis of Helicobacter
pylori in Bleeding Peptic Ulcer Patients,
Evaluation of Urea-Based Tests. Digestion 2002; 66: 9-13
8 Bobrzynski A, Beben P, Budzynski A, Bielanski W,
Plonka M, Konturek S. Incidence of complications of peptic ulcers in
patients with Helicobacter pylori (Hp) infection
and/or NSAID use in the era of Hp eradication. Med Sci
Monit 2002; 8: CR554-557
9 Sato Y, Iwafuchi M, Ueki J, Yoshimura A, Mochizuki T,
Motoyama H, Sugimura K, Honma T, Narisawa R, Ichida T,
Asakura H, Van T. Gastric carcinoid tumors
without autoimmune gastritis in Japan: a relationship with Helicobacter
pylori infection. Dig Dis Sci 2002; 47:
579-585
10 Gomollon F, Sicilia B. Helicobacter pylori: strategies for treatment.
Expert Opin Investig Drugs 2001; 10: 1231-1241
11 Zhuang XQ, Lin SR. Research of Helicobacter pylori infection in
precancerous gastric lesions. World J
Gastroenterol 2000; 6:428-429
12 Peng ZS, Liang ZC, Liu MC, Ouyang NT. Studies on gastric epithelial
cell proliferation and apoptosis in Hp associated
gastric ulcer. Shijie Huaren Xiaohua Zazhi 1999;
7: 218-219
13 Kawakami E, Ogata SK, Portorreal AC, Magni AM, Pardo ML, Patricio FR.
Triple therapy with clarithromycin, amoxicillin
and omeprazole for Helicobacter pylori
eradication in children and adolescents. Arq Gastroenterol 2001; 38:
203-206
14 Fanti L, Ieri R, Mezzi G, Testoni PA, Passaretti S, Guslandi M.
Long-term follow-up and serologic assessment after triple
therapy with omeprazole or lansoprazole of
Helicobacter-associated duodenal ulcer. J Clin Gastroenterol 2001; 32:
45-48
15 Buzas Gyorgy M, Szekely E, Illyes G, Szeles I. Lansoprazole versus
ranitidine bismuth citrate containing triple regimens
for Helicobacter pylori eradication in patients
with duodenal ulcer Orv Hetil 2000; 141: 1711-1714
16 Catalano F, Catanzaro R, Bentivegna C, Brogna A, Condorelli G,
Cipolla R. Ranitidine bismuth citrate versus omeprazole
triple therapy for the eradication of
Helicobacter pylori and healing of duodenal ulcer. Aliment Pharmacol
Ther 1998; 12: 59-62
17 Ruggiero P, Peppoloni S, Berti D, Rappuoli R, Giudice GD. New
strategies for the prevention and treatment of
Helicobacter pylori infection. Expert Opin
Investig Drugs 2002; 11: 1127-1138
18 Velasco Benitez CA, Amorocho Perez RD. Treatment of
gastritis-associated Helicobacter pylori infection in children.
Rev Gastroenterol Peru 2002; 22: 159-163
19 Catalano F, Branciforte G, Catanzaro R, Bentivegna C, Cipolla R.
Nuciforo G, Brogna A. Comparative treatment of
Helicobacter pylori-positive duodenal ulcer using
pantoprazole at low and high doses versus omeprazole in triple
therapy. Helicobacter 1999; 4: 178-184
20 Osato MS, Reddy SG, Piergies AA, Bochenek WJ, Testa RT, Graham
DY. Comparative efficacy of new investigational
agents against Helicobacter pylori. Aliment
Pharmacol Ther 2001; 15: 487-492
21 Kim BO, Shin SS, Yoo YH, Pyo S. Peroral immunization with
Helicobacter pylori adhesin protein genetically linked to
cholera toxin A2B subunits. Clin Sci (Lond) 2001;
100: 291-298
22 Challacombe SJ, Sweet SP. Oral mucosal immunity and HIV
infection: current status. Oral Dis 2002; 8 Suppl 2: 55-62
23 van Ginkel FW, Nguyen HH, McGhee JR. Vaccines for mucosal
immunity to combat emerging infectious diseases. Emerg
Infect Dis 2000; 6: 123-132
24 Mutwiri G, Bowersock T, Kidane A, Sanchez M, Gerdts V, Babiuk
LA, Griebel P. Induction of mucosal immune
responses following enteric immunization with
antigen delivered in alginate microspheres. Vet Immunol
Immunopathol 2002; 87: 269-276
25 Ishizaka ST, Israel ZR, Gettie A, Mishkin EM, Staas JK, Gilley
RM, Dailey PJ, Montefiori DC, Marx PA, Eldridge JH.
Induction of mucosal antibody responses by
microsphere-encapsulated formalin-inactivated simian immunodeficiency virus
in a male urethral challenge model. Vaccine 1999;
17: 2817-2825
26 Allaoui-Attarki K, Pecquet S, Fattal E, Trolle S, Chachaty E,
Couvreur P, Andremont A. Protective immunity against
Salmonella typhimurium elicited in mice by oral
vaccination with phosphorylcholine encapsulated in poly(DL-lactic-co-
glycolide) microparticles. Infect. Immun 1997; 65:
853-857
27 Wang MY, Levi AD, Shah S, Green BA. Polylactic acid mesh
reconstruction of the anterior iliac crest after bone
harvesting reduces early postoperative pain after
anterior cervical fusion surgery. Neurosurgery 2002; 51: 413-416
28 Camargo PM, Lekovic V, Weinlaender M, Vasilic N, Madzarevic M,
Kenney EB. Platelet-rich plasma and bovine porous
bone mineral combined with guided tissue
regeneration in the treatment of intrabony defects in humans. J Periodontal
Res 2002;37:300-306
29 Giardino R, Fini M, Nicoli Aldini N, Giavaresi G, Rocca M.
Polylactide bioabsorbable polymers for guided tissue regeneration.
J Trauma 1999; 47: 303-308
30 Hoffman GT, Soller EC, McNally-Heintzelman KM. Biodegradable
synthetic polymer scaffolds for reinforcement of
albumin protein solders used for laser-assisted
tissue repair. Biomed Sci Instrum 2002; 38: 53-58
31 Huang YY, Chung TW, Tzeng TW. A method using biodegradable
polylacitides/polyethylene glycol for drug release
with reduced initial burst. Int J Pharm 1999;
182: 93-100
32 Deng X, Zhou S, Li X, Zhao J, Yuan M. In vitro degradation and
release profiles for poly-dl-lactide-poly(ethylene
glycol) microspheres containing human serum
albumin. J Control Release 2001; 71: 165-173
33 Yang YY, Chung TS, Ng NP. Morphology, drug distribution, and in
vitro release profiles of biodegradable
polymeric microspheres containing protein
fabricated by double-emulsion solvent extraction/evaporation method.
Biomaterials 2001; 22: 231-241
34 Yang YY,Chia HH, Chung TS. Effect of preparation temperature on
the characteristics and release profiles
of PLGA microspheres containing protein
fabricated by double-emulsion solvent extraction/evaporation method.
J Control Release 2000; 69: 81-96
35 Ferrero RL, Thiberge JM, Labigne A. Local immunoglobulin
G antibodies in the stomach may contribute to immunity
against Helicobacter infection in mice.
Gastroenterology 1997; 113:185-194
36 Mattsson A, Lonroth H, Quiding Jarbrink M, Svennerholm AM.Induction
of B cell responses in the stomach of
Helicobacter pylori- infected subjects after oral
cholera vaccination. J Clin Invest 1998; 102: 51-56
37 Ishii H, Nakagawa Y. Stress response to surgical procedures in
the submandibular region and its influence on salivary
secretion in mice. Arch Oral Biol 2001; 46:
387-390
38 Matsumoto J, Nakada Y, Sakurai K, Nakamura T, Takahshi Y.
Preparation of nanoparticles consisted of poly(L-lactide)-
poly(ethylene glycol)-poly(L-lactide) and their
evalution in vitro. Int J Pharm 1999; 185: 93-101
39 Kim SY, Doh HJ, Ahn JS, Ha YJ, Jang MH, Chung SI, Park HJ. Induction
of mucosal and systemic immune response by
oral immunization with H. pylori lysates
encapsulated in poly (DL-lactide-co-glycolide) microparticles.
Vaccines 1999; 17: 607-616
40 Kofler N, Ruedl C, Klima J, Recheis H, Bock G, Wick G, Wolf H.
Preparation and characterization of poly(DL-lactic-co-
glycolide) and poly-(L-lactic acid ) microspheres
with entrapped pneumotropic bacterial antigens. J Immunol
Meth 1996; 192:25-35
41 Eldridge JH, Staas JK, Meulbroek JA, Tice TR, Gilley RM.
Biodegradable and biocompatible poly(DL-lactide-co-
glycolide) microspheres as an adjuvant for
staphylococcal enterotoxin B toxoid which enhances the level of toxin-
neutralizing antibodies.Infect Immun 1991; 59:
2978-2986
Edited by Ma JY