|
Jing
Xu1, Ming Hui Mei1, Si En Zeng2, Qing Fen
Shi1, Yong
Ming Liu4 and Li Ling Qin3
1Department
of Hepatobiliary Surgery, 2Department of Pathology, 3Institute
of Hepatobiliary Surgery,4Department of Biochemistry,
Guilin 541001, Guangxi Province, China
Jing Xu, graduated from Tongji Medical University as a postgraduate,
now associate professor, specialized in hepatology,
having 15 papers.
Supported by the grant from the Guangxi Science and Technology
Committee, No.9811003
Correspondence to: Dr. Jing Xu, 95 Leque Road, Department of
Hepatobiliary Surgery, Guilin Medical College,
Guilin 541001, Guangxi, China
Telephone:
0086-773-2810411, Fax.
0086-773-2822194 Email. Jxu@gliet.edu.cn
Received: 2000-09-01 Accepted: 2000-09-29
Subject
headings: liver
neoplasms/diagnosis; intercellular adhesion molecule-1; RNA,
messenger; alpha-fetoprotein; immunohistochemistry; polymerase chain
reaction; radioimmunoassay
Xu J, Mei MH, Zeng SE, Shi QF, Liu YM, Qin LL. Expressions of ICAM-1
and its mRNA in sera and tissues of patients with hepatocellular
carcinoma. World J Gastroentero, 2001;7(1):120-125
INTRODUCTION
The increased expression of ICAM-1 on a wide range of cells and
in the sera of patients with malignancies, chronic liver diseases
and inflammation diseases has been described since the late 1980s[1-22].
Recently rapid progress in studies on expression of ICAM-1 in
patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) have been achieved,
including clinical and experimental researches[23-31]. It
is well known now that ICAM-1 expressed in two ways in HCC: ①
membrane-bounded ICAM-1 on the surface of HCC cells (mbICAM-1),
which did not express in normal liver cells, and ②
soluble ICAM-1 (sICAM-1) in sera of the patients, the concentration
of which is well correlated with the progress and prognosis of the
disease[32]. However, little is known about whether
sICAM-1 is a diagnostic marker for early detecting HCC and
monitoring its postoperative recurrence. It has been demonstrated
that measurement of sICAM-1 might be of clinical values for early
diagnosis and monitoring recurrence of HCC, particularly in patients
with normal or low serum level of α-fetoprotein (AFP)[33-37].
Another controversy in this field is what is the main source of high
levels of circulating sICAM-1 in HCC patients. It was reported that
there were two forms of sICAM-1: HCC-specific circulating form of
ICAM-1 shedding from HCC cells, and inflammation-associated ICAM-1
upregulated by several cytokines, of which interferon-gamma
(INF-gamma) was the main cytokine trigger for ICAM-1 expression[38].
To solve the two problems mentioned above has become the key to the
study. For this purpose, we have further confirmed the clinical
values of sICAM-1 detection in HCC compared with benign liver
diseases and normal control, analyzed the serum levels of AFP and
sICAM-1 in HCC; observed mbICAM-1 expression in different regions of
HCC tissues with the immunohistochemistry, and measured the
expression of ICAM-1 mRNA in tissue samples by reverse transcriptase
polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR).
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Patients
Between January 1997 and July 2000, 151 patients with pathologically
proven HCC either by surgical resection of liver tumors or by liver
biopsies (131 men and 20 women; aged from 14 to 80 years, median 49)
were treated in our department. Tumor was less than 5cm in diameter
in 21 patients,less than 10cm in 43 and more than 10cm or with
extrahepatic metastasis in 87 cases. Liver cirrhosis was found in
137 patients. Hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) was positive in
129 patients. Hepatitis C antibody was positive in 14 patients. The
serum concentration of AFP was measured in all cases by
radioimmunoassay (RIA) and its reference ranges were classified as
follows: >200μg/L as positive in 93; 20μg/L-200μg/L
as questionable positive in 33 and <20μg/L as negative in 25[35].
Treatment included surgical procedures (in 90 cases), interventioanl
radiology (IR in 46) and percuteneous ethanol injection (PEI in 15).
Among the surgically-treated patients, tumor resection was performed
in 75, including radical resection in 42, nonradical in 33 due to
intrahepatic vascular invasion on the resected margin pathologically
or intrahepatic metastasis of tumor found intraoperatively.
Laparotomy cathterization of the hepatic artery was undertaken in
15. The 46 patients underwent IR therapies including transcatheter
arterial embolization (TAE) in 30 and transcatheter arterial
infusion (TAI) in 16.
Follow-up of the patients undergoing hepatectomies
The patients undergoing hepatectomies were followed up monthly in
the first year and once every two months in the second year
postoperatively. During the follow-up, serum concentration of AFP
and sICAM-1, liver function and image examinations including BUS, CT
or selective hepatic angiography were undertaken. Tumor recurrence
was confirmed when intrahepatic lesion or portal vein tumor thrombi
were found by liver image, and pathological diagnosis was
established by reoperation or biopsy of the tumor.
ELISA for sICAM-1
Concentrations of sICAM-1 were measured with an enzyme-linked
immunosorbent assay kit (Biosource Europe, Fleurus, Belgium) as
described previously[31-37]. In all HCC patients, sICAM-1
levels were compared with their levels of serum AFP. As controls,
serum levels of sICAM-1 were measured in 62 patients with chronic
hepatitis B (CH), 60 with liver cirrhosis (LC) and 50 healthy blood
donors.Immunohistochemistry of liver tissues -Tissues from tumor and
adjacent region were obtained from 52 patients with surgical
resection. Histologically normal liver tissues were obtained from 3
patients with liver hemangioma. To demonstrate the presence of
ICAM-1 in the resected liver tissues, each fresh specimen was cut at
-20℃
with the cryostat (4μm- thick), mounted on
sialinized adhesion microscope slides, dried overnight at room
temperature, fixed with cold acetone (-20℃)
for 10 min and chloroform for 20 min. Anti-human ICAM-1 mouse
monoclonal antibody (Clone HA58, Pharmigen) was used. The slides
were washed twice in TRIS/0.2% BSA and then incubated with
sheep-anti-mouse-Ig (DAKO, Copenhagen, Denmark). And then the
staining reaction was developed with a
streptavidin-biotinylated-alkaline-phosphatase-complex (DAKO),slides
were counterstained with hematoxylin, and nonreacting monoclonal
antibody of IgG-1-isotype (DAKO) was used as negative control.
RNA extraction and DNA amplification
The total RNA was isolated from the fresh resected liver tissues by
the acid guanidium thiocynate-phennol-chloroform method[39] (Gstract,
Maxim Biotech, Inc., San Francisco, USA). The concentration of RNA
was determined from absorption at 260nm, and A 260: -80 ratios were
>1.7. RNA (10μg)was subjected to electrophoresis in 1.5%
agarose gels. The PCR primer for ICAM-1 and GAPDH were designed
according to Vigano et al[40]. The following four
primers presented by Dr. Shraven were used: ①
(105) 5’-TGATGACATCAAGAAGGTGGTGAAG-3’; ②
(1047) 5’-TCCTTGAGGCCATGTGGGC--CAT-3’; ③
(825) 5’-GTCCCCTCAAAAGTCATCC-3’; ④
(1064) 5’-AACCCCATTCAGCGTCACCT-3’. The primer set was used to
amplify an intron-spanning region of the human
glyceraldeyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) gene. The latter
gene provided a constitutively expressed internal control for
complementary DNA contamination. The presence of ICAM-1 and GAPDH
mRNAs was demonstrated by amplifying respective target sequences
using PCR according to the instruction provided with the Technical
Bulletin Kit (Promega). In brief, 3μL (2.5mM) RNA, and 50pmol/L
primers for ICAM-1 or GAPDH were added to each reaction mixture
respectively, which included 0.4mM dNTPs 2μL, 3μL (1.5mM)
MgSO4, AM V reverse transcriptase 1μL (5U), TfI DNA
polymerase 1μL (5U), and AMV/TfI 5×buffer 10μL. The final
reaction volume was 50μL and was covered with 20μL mineral
oil. Then with PCR thermal cycle(Hema 480, China), RT-PCR reaction
was run in the following procedures: ①
48℃
for 45 min, 1 circle; ②
94℃
for 2 min, 1 circle; ③
94℃
for 30s, 60℃
for 1 min, 38℃
for 2 min, 30 circles; and ④
68℃
for 7min, 1 circle. Five μL PCR product was placed on 1.5%
agarose gel and observed by EB staining under UV light, the
electrophoresis photo was transformed into computer, and ICAM-1
intensity was analyzed with MPIAS500 image system, while the GAPDH
band intensity was subtracted as an internal standard.
Statistical analysis
Groups were compared by the Kruskal-Wallsi test and the t
test.
RESULTS
sICAM-1 measurement
The concentrations of sICAM-1 measured in different groups are
illustrated in Figure 1. The levels of sICAM-1 in the patients with
CH (median -462μg/L), LC (median-587μg/L) and HCC (median
-1120μg/L) were significantly higher than that in the normal
control (median -285μg/L)(P<0.01). The levels of
sICAM-1 in HCC group was also significantly higher than those in CH
and LC groups
(P<0.01).
Figure 1(PDF)
Serum concentration of sICAM-1 in normal controls (n=50), in
patients with chronic hepatitis (CH, n=62), cirrhosis (LC, n=60),
and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC, n=151). aP<0.05,bP<0.01.
Comparative analysis of the serum values of sICAM-1 and AFP in
HCC patients is listed in Table 1. There were 93 (62%) patients with
positive serum AFP, and 58 (38%) with questionable and negative (33
and 25). However, the median values of sICAM-1 in these patients
were 1597, 1456 and 1271μg/L respectively. Statistical analysis
showed no significant differences. In addition, analysis of ranges
of sICAM-1 of HCC patients showed that 129 (85.4%) patients had a
serum concentration exceeding 1000μg/L, which was higher than
the positive rate of serum AFP in the group of same patients.
Table 1 Comparative analysis of serum levels of sICAM-1 and
AFP in HCC patients
|
Group
|
Number
of patients
|
sICAM-1(μg/L)
|
AFP(μg/L)
|
|
AFP<20μg/L
|
25
|
1271
|
18
|
|
AFP
20-200μg/L
|
33
|
1456
|
121
|
|
AFP>200μg/L
|
93
|
1597
|
26280
|
During
the postoperative follow-up period of 6-61 months, tumor recurrence
was confirmed in 41 patients. The median level of sICAM-1 of the
patients was 1051μg/L and 30 (73.2%) cases had a value higher
than 1000μg/L. On the other hand, there were 25 (60%) patients
with serum AFP positive (>200μg/L). In 6 patients with
negative AFP, tumor recurrence was not detected by liver image until
their serum levels of sICAM-1 had exceeded 2-4 times higher than
before for 1-4 months.
Immunohistochemical staining
In all HCC samples, cancerous regions showed positive membrane
staining for ICAM-1 with a honeycomb pattern (Figure 2). Parts of
plasma of HCC cells showed strong positive reactions. In contrast to
the cancerous areas, in noncancerous adjacent areas (Figure 3), the
expression of ICAM-1 was negative, except those hepatocytes in
severe cirrhotic areas. Normal liver tissue showed negative or very
weak staining of the vascular endothelial cells and hepatocyts for
ICAM-1 (Figure 4).
RT-PCR detection of ICAM-1
ICAM-1 mRNA in HCC tissues was detected by RT-PCR analysis (Figure
5). The result showed that freshly aspirated liver tissues expressed
the gene coding for ICAM-1 because RT-PCR generated a DNA fragment
corresponding to the predicted length, 943bp, of the ICAM-1
amplification product. In each tissue sample, all GAPDH
amplification products were of 240bp length. The results revealed
that the expression of ICAM-1 was stronger in the carcinomatous
tissues of 28/43 cases (65.1%) than that in the paracacinomatous
tissues of 13/43(30.2%) cases. Thirty-two of 43 cases had the levels
of sICAM-1 >1000μg/L .
Figure 2
Immunohistochemical staining of ICAM-1 in hepatocellular carcinoma
tissue is positive on the surface of tumor cells and in a honeycomb
pattern.
Figure 3
Increased expression of ICAM-1 in paracancerous tissue was shown
with severe cirrhosis by immunohistochemical staining.
Figure 4
ICAM-1 expression was negative in normal liver tissue by
immunohistochemical staining (AEC method).
Figure 5 RT-PCR
product gel electrophoresis. Three μL RT-PCR products of ICAM-1
and GAPDH run on 1.5% agarose gel stained with EB. Lane 1 and Lane
4: the control for ICAM-1 and GAPDH. Lane 2 and 5: paracarcinomatous
tissue for ICAM-1 and GAPDH. Lane and 6: HCC tissues for ICAM-1 and
GAPDH.
The
clinicopathological analysis of ICAM-1 mRNA and HCC is shown in
Table 2. In the patients with serum levels of sICAM-1 above 1000μg/L,
the expression rates of ICAM-1 mRNA in HCC and adjacent tissues were
75.0% and 34.4%, respectively (P<0.01), however, in group
with sICAM-1 lower than 1000μg/L, the expression rate in those
tissues were 36.4% and 18.2%, respectively (P>0.05). It is
noticed that the expression rate of ICAM-1 mRNA was related to the
severity of liver cirrhosis and intrahepatic metastasis of tumor.
However, the expression rates of ICAM-1 mRNA were not correlated
with the serum levels of AFP, differentiation of tumor and tumor
sizes.
Table 2 Clinicopathological analysis of ICAM-1 mRNA and HCC
%(n)
|
Clinical
data
|
Cases
|
Positive
tumor ICAM-1 mRNA
|
Positive
paratumor ICAM-1 mRNA
|
|
Serum
AFP>400μg/L
|
25
|
68.0
(17/25)
|
32.0(8/25)
|
|
Serum
AFP<400μg/L
|
18
|
61.1(11/18)
|
27.8(5/18)
|
|
sICAM-1>1000μg/La
|
32
|
75.0(25/32)
|
34.4(11/32)
|
|
<1000μg/L
|
11
|
36.4(
3/11)
|
18.2(
2/11)
|
|
Severe
cirrhosisa Yes
|
30
|
80.0(24/30)
|
36.7(11/30)
|
|
No
|
13
|
30.8(
4/13)
|
15.4(
2/13)
|
|
Differentiation
High
|
15
|
66.7(10/15)
|
33.3(
4/15)
|
|
Low
|
28
|
64.3(18/28)
|
32.1(
9/28)
|
|
Tumor
size >5cm
|
31
|
66.7(
8/12)
|
25.0(
3/12)
|
|
<5cm
|
12
|
64.5(20/31)
|
32.3(10/31)
|
|
Intrahepatic
metastasisb Yes
|
15
|
86.7(13/15)
|
40.0(
6/15)
|
|
No
|
28
|
46.4
(13/28)
|
25.0(
7/28)
|
aP<0.01;
bP<0.05.
DISCUSSION
HCC is one of the malignancies, which inflicts Chinese
population severely. The prognosis of the disease is still dismal
due to a delayed diagnosis, low resected rate and high recurrence
rate of the tumor. Thus early diagnosis and effective postoperative
monitoring are important to improve the surgical effectiveness for
HCC[41]. The present study further confirmed our previous
observations and other reports, in which elevated serum sICAM-1 was
found in HCC, which was significantly higher than in benign liver
diseases and the normal controls (Figure 1). As described by Shimizu
et al[42], a sICAM-1 level above 1000μg/L is
a determinant for prognosis and progression of HCC. In our 151
patients with HCC, 129 (85.4%) cases had a high serum concentration
of ICAM-1 above 1000μg/L, which suggested that the positivity
of sICAM-1 was higher than that of serum AFP. Although the serum
levels of AFP in the HCC patients were different (Table 1), the
sICAM-1 levels in the same group of patients showed no significant
differences, particularly in cases with low levels of or negative
AFP, indicating that measurement of sICAM-1 might be of diagnostic
value for HCC.
Another interesting finding from our study is that in patients
with AFP negative or questionable positive, sICAM-1 is a more
sensitive serum diagnostic marker than AFP and other procedures,
including BUS, CT, etc. In 41 patients with tumor recurrence
detected during the postoperative follow-up, 73.2% patients had a
high level of sICAM-1 above 1000μg/L , however, the proportion
of positive serum AFP in the same cases was only 60%. Moreover, in 6
of the 41 patients with negative AFP, tumor recurrence was diagnosed
1-4 months earlier by sICAM-1 than by liver image examination. We
believe that sICAM-1 is not only a useful marker for predicting the
progression and prognosis of the disease, but also a sensitive
marker for diagnosing and monitoring HCC and its recurrence,
especially for patients with low serum concentrations of AFP when
the serum level of sICAM-1 was above
1000μg/L[32-36].
As mentioned above, our clinical observations strongly
supported that sICAM-1 might be of diagnostic value for HCC.
However, it is unknown what is the main source of high level of
sICAM-1 in HCC: HCC- specific ICAM-1 shedding from mbICAM-1 or
inflammation-associated ICAM-1[38]. To distinguish the
two forms of ICAM-1 is the ultimate goal of the study in this field[38].
Clinically, we have got the evidence that sICAM-1 is derived from
HCC tumor cells, because we found in non-radical resected patients,
the sICAM-1 concentrations maintained at a high level after the
operation compared with those who underwent a radical resection of
tumors, whose sICAM-1 levels would be decreased to the normal within
1-2 months postoperatively. This suggested that circulating sICAM-1
in HCC may originate mainly from tumor cell itself[36,37].
To
verify our clinical findings that sICAM-1 is mainly derived from the
HCC cells, we investigated the expression of ICAM-1 in HCC and its
adjacent tissues with immunohistochemistry. The results showed that
ICAM-1 expressed strongly in all specimens of HCC, but did not
express in noncancerous regions, which reflected such a fact that
high serum sICAM-1 levels of HCC patients might be attributable to
tumor cells and a malignant transformation of hepatocytes. Our
inference was supported by other authors[24,30,43,44].
Torri and Momosaky reported a high expression rate of ICAM-1 in HCC
(80%-96%). Although three possible mechanisms for the expression of
ICAM-1 were considered, Torri et al hold that malignant
transformation of liver cells appeared to be the most important
mechanism for the ICAM-1 expression in HCC. Thus they concluded that
examination of ICAM-1 might yield significant information on the
process of malignant transformation of hepatocytes[41,43].
In the nude mouse liver cancer metastasis model, Sun JJ et al demostrated
that tissue ICAM-1 and sICAM-1 could indicate the stage of HCC,
potential of hepatoma cells for invasion and metastasis[45].
In addition, in vitro study by Momosaky et al showed
that HCC cell itself markedly secreted soluble ICAM-1 into the
culture supernantant in tumor cell lines[43]. On the
other hand, no soluble ICAM-1 was shed from normal mouse hepatocytes
regardless of the presence or absence of cytokine stimuli[43].
According to the observations from the present and other studies
mentioned above, we think that high levels of sICAM-1 in HCC
patients might be released mostly from the tumor cells.
After the clinical and immunohistochemical studies, we have
recently investigated the correlation between serum levels of
sICAM-1 and expression of its mRNA in HCC tissues. The results
(Table 2) suggested that hepatocytes transformation may be the
essential cause for strong expression of ICAM-1 mRNA, as in
carcinomatous tissues of the 43 patients, the positive rate of
expression was 65.1% (28/43). However, that in non-carcinomatous
tissues was only 30% (13/43), which was quite different from the HCC
tissues (P<0.01), and in normal liver tissues expression
of ICAM-1 mRNA did not exist. Furthermore, the same correlation
between the expression of ICAM-1 mRNA and the serum concentrations
of sICAM-1 was observed. In patients with serum levels of sICAM-1
above 1000μg/L , the expression rates of ICAM-1 mRNA in HCC and
adjacent tissues were 75% and 34.4%, respectively, however, in group
with sICAM-1 lower than 1000μg/L , the expression rates were
36.4% and 18.2% respectively, which indicated that the expression of
ICAM-1 protein was controlled by its correlative gene at the level
of transcription regulation.
The expression rate of ICAM-1 mRNA was also related to the
severity of liver cirrhosis and intrahepatic metastasis of tumor.
Particularly in the later circumstances, the expression rate was
much higher in metastatic patients (86.7%) than those without
metastasis (53.6%), which suggested that the expression of ICAM-1
mRNA may play an important role in tumor intra and extrahepatic
spread. These results were identical to our clinical observations,
in which the proportion of sICAM-1 level >1000μg/L was
higher than that of AFP (73.2% vs 60%) and sICAM-1 level was more
sensitive than liver image examinations in indicating tumor
recurrence.
Based on our
studies on expressions of ICAM-1 and its mRNA in serum and tissues
of HCC, we concluded that: ①
Serum levels of sICAM-1 in HCC were significantly higher than that
in benign liver diseases and normal controls, which indicated that
it is useful to measure sICAM-1 to differentiate HCC from other
benign lesions when the level of sICAM-1 is higher than 1000μg/L.
②
The high expression level of sICAM-1 might result from the strong
expression of ICAM-1 in HCC tissue, which was controlled by its
related gene. The source of sICAM-1 in HCC was originated mainly
from HCC cells. ③
In HCC with intrahepatic metastasis, the expression of ICAM-1 mRNA
was significantly high, which suggested that detecting sICAM-1 is of
important value in predicting tumor recurrence after surgery. ④
With understanding of the mechanism of ICAM-1 expression and its
origination, we believe that measurement of sICAM-1 may be of
diagnostic value for HCC, particularly in patients with low levels
of serum AFP.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT We gratefully acknowledge Prof. Meuer for his
cooperation, Dr. Shraven for the primers of PCR; and Yong Ming Liu,
and Si En Zen for their excellent works in this study.
REFERENCES
1 Marlin
SD, Springer TA. Purified intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1)
is a ligand for lymphocyte
functiona-associated antigen
1 (LFA-1). Cell, 1987;51:813-819
2 Wang YJ,
Sun ZQ, Yu JJ, Xu XZ, Zhang X, Quan QZ. Biological effects of type I
and III collagens in human
hepatocellular carcinoma tissue. China
Natl J New Gastroenterol, 1995;1:18-20
3 Osborn L,
Hession C, Tizard R, Vassallo C, Luhowskyl S, Chi-Rosso G, Lobb R.
Direct expression cloning of vascular cell
adhesion molecule 1, a cytokinea-induced
endothelial protein that binds to lymphocytes. Cell,
1989;59:1203-1211
4 Staunton
DE, Merluzzi VJ, Rothlein R, Barton R, Marlin S, Springer TA. A cell
adhesion molecule, ICAM-1, is the major
surface receptor for rhinoviruses. Cell,
1989;56:849-853
5 Adams DH,
Hubscher SG, Shaw J, Rothlein R, Neuberger JM. Intercellular
adhesion molecule 1 on liver allografts during
rejection. Lancet,
1989;11:1122-1124
6 Vogetseder
W, Feichinger H, Schulz TF, Schwaeble W, Tabaczewski P, Mitterer M,
Böck
G, Marth C, Dapunt O,
Mikuz
G, Dierich MP.
Expression of 7F7-antigen, ahuman adhesion molecule identical to
intercellular adhesion
molecule-1
(ICAM-1) in human
carcinomas and their stromal fibroblasts. Int J Cancer,
1989;43:768-773
7 Adams DH,
Hubscher SG, Shaw J, Johnson GD, Babbs C, Rothlein R, Neuberger
JM.Increased expression of intercellular
adhesion molecule 1 on bile ducts in
primary biliary cirrhosis and primary sclerosing cholangitis.
Hepatology,1991;14:426-431
8 Zöhrens
G, Armbrust T, Pirzer U, zum Büschenfelde KHM, Ramadori G.
Intercellular adhesion molecule-1 concentration
in
sera of patients with
acute and chronic liver disease: relationship to disease activity
and cirrhosis. Hepatology,
1993;18:798-802
9 Morita M,
Watanabe Y, Akaike T. Inflammatory cytokines up-regulate
intercellular adhesion molecule-1 expression on
primary cultured mouse hepatocytes
and T-lymphocyte adhesion. Hepatology, 1994;19:426-431
10 Hutchins D, Steel CM. Regulation of ICAM-1 (CD54)
expression in human breast cancer cell lines by interleukin 6
and fibroblast-derived factors.
Int J Cancer, 1993;58:80-84
11 Zhang BH, Wu MC. Evaluation of serum AFP-reactive-lentil
lectin determined by its mAb in the diagnosis of
hepatocellular carcinoma. China
Natl J New Gastroenterol, 1995;1:33-36
12 Seth R, Raymond FD, Makgoba MW. Circulating ICAM-1 isoforms:
diagnostic prospects for inflammatory and
immune disorders.Lancet,1991;338:83-84
13 Schwaeble W, Kerlin M, zum Büschenfelde KHM, Dippold W. De
novo expression of intercellular adhesion molecule 1
(ICAM-1, CD54) in pancreas cancer.
Int J Cancer, 1993;53:328-333
14 Voraberger G, Schäfer
R, Stratowa C. Cloning of the human gene for intercellular adhesion
molecule-1 and analysis
of its 5-regulatory
region: induction by cytokines and phorbol ester. J Immunol,
1991;147:2777-2786
15 Adams DH, Mainolfi
E, Burra P, Neuberrger JM, Ayres R, Elias E, Rothlein R. Detection
of circulating intercellular
adhesion molecule-1 in chronic liver diseases. Hepatology,
1992;16:810-814
16 Chen J, Gong XY,
Zhang YF. Clinical significance and immunogical measurement of cell
adhesion molecules. Guowai
Yixue Mianyixue Fence,1993;6:310-313
17 Tanaka Y, Hayashi M,
Takagi S, Yoshie O. Differential transactivation of the
intercellular adhesion molecule-1 gene
promoter by Tax1 and Tax2 of human T-cell leukemia viruses. J Virol,
1996;70:8508-8517
18 Zhang JF, Zhang B,
Liu SF. Clinical significance of soluble intercellular adhesion
molecule-1. Shanghai Mianyixue Zazhi,
1994;14:374-375
19 Chen GY, Cao XT, Yu
YZ, Zhang WP, Tao Q. Interleukin (IL)-2. Or IL-4 gene transfer in
human melanoma cell,
expression and function of intercellular adhesion molecule-1. Zhongguo
Mianyixue Zazhi, 1996;12:20-22
20 Muñoz C,
Castellanos MC, Alfranca A, Vara A, Esteban MA, Redondo JM,de Landázuri
MO. Transcriptional up-regulation
of
intracellular adhesion molecule-1 in human endothelial cells by the
antioxidant pyrrolidine dithiocarbamate involves
the actication of activating protein-1. J Immunol,
1996;157:3587-3597
21 Dustin ML, Springer
TA. Lymphocyte function-associated antigen-1 (LFA-1) interaction
with intercellular adhesion
molecule-1 (ICAM-1) is one of at
least three mechanisms for lymphocyte adhesion to cultured
endothelial cells.
J Cell Biol, 1988;107:321-331
22 Budnik A, Grewe M,
Gyufko K, Krutmann J. Analysis of the production of soluble ICAM-1
molecules by human cells.
Experiment Hematol,
1996;24:352-359
23 Tsujisaki M, Imai K,
Hirata H, Hanzawa Y, Masuya J, Nakano T, Sugiyama T, Matsui M,
Hinoda Y, Yachi A. Detection of
circulating intercellular adhesion
molecule-1 antigen in malignant diseases. Clin Exp
Immunol, 1991;85:3-8
24 Torii A, Harada A,
Nakao A, Nonami T, Ito M, Takagi H. Expression of intercellular
adhesion molecule-1 in
hepatocellular carcinoma. J Surg Oncol, 1993;53:239-242
25 Feng GS, Kramann B,
Zheng CS, Zhou RM, Liang B, Zhang YF. Comparative study on the
effects of hepatic arterial
embolization
with Bletilla Striata or gelfoam in the treatment of primary hepatic
carcinoma. China Natl J New
Gastroenterol,
1996;2:158-160
26 Wang D, Shi JQ.
Overexpression and mutations of tumor suppressor gene p53 in
hepatocellular carcinoma. China Natl J
New
Gastroenterol, 1996;2:161-164
27 Hu SX, Fang GY.
Clinical use of hepatic carcinoma associated membrane protein
antigen (HAg18-1) for detection of
primary
hepatocellular carcinoma. China Natl J New Gastroenterol,
1996;2:165-166
28 Sun JJ, Zhou XD, Liu
YK, Zhou G, Chen J, Tang ZY. Phasic expression of tissue
intercellular adhesion molecule-1 in
human liver cancer metastasis model in nude mice. Zhonghua Shiyan
Waike Zazhi, 1999;16:155-156
29 Sun JJ, Zhou XD,
Zhou G, Liu YK. Expression of intercellular adhesive molecule-1 in
liver cancer tissues andliver cancer
metastasis.
World J Gastroentero, 1998;4:202-205
30 Sun JJ, Zhou XD, Liu
YK, Zhou G. Phase tissue intercellular adhesion molecule-1
expression in nude mice human liver
cancer
metastasis model. World J Gastroentero, 1998;4:314-316
31 Xu J, Mei MH, Dai ZB.
Significance of detecting intercellular adhesion molecule-1 in
hepatocellular carcinoma. Guowai
Yixue
Mianyixue Fence, 1998;21:86-89
32 Mei MH, Xu J, Chen
Q, Yang JH, Deng W, Shi QF, Tan LL. Measurement of serum and bile
intercellular adhesion
molecule-1
in patients with obstructive jaundice. Huazhong Yixue Zazhi,
2000;24:2-3
33 Xu J, Mei MH, Shi QF.
Clinical value of serum circulating intercellular adhesion
molecule-1 in hepatocellular carcinoma.
Zhonghua Shiyan Waike Zazhi,
1998;15:514-515
34 Mei MH, Xu J, Shi QF,
Chen Q, Qin LL. Measurement of serum circulating intercellular
adhesion molecule-1 and
its
clinical significance in
hepatocellular carcinoma. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg,
1999;6:181-185
35 Mei MH, Xu J, Shi QF,
Yang JH, Chen Q, Qin LL. Clinical significance of serum
intercellular adhesion molecule-1
detection in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. World J
Gastroenterol, 2000;6:408-410
36 Xu J, Mei MH, Shi QF.
Combining with sevral marks for diagnosis of primary in
hepatocellular carcinoma. Huazhong
Yixue Zazhi, 2000;24:81-82
37 Hyodo I, Jinno K,
Tanimizu M, Doi T, Nishikawa Y, Hosokawa Y, Moriwaki S.
Intercellular adhesion molecule-1
release from human hepatocellular carcinoma. Cancer Detection Prevention,
1996;20:308-315
38 Chomczynski P,
Sacchi N. Single-step method of RNA isolation by acid guanidinium
thiocyanate-phenol-chloroform
extraction. Analyt Biochem,
1987;162:156-159
40 Viganò P, Gaffuri
B, Ragni G, Di Blasio AM, Vignali M. Intercellular adhesion
molecule-1 is expressed on human
granulosa cells and mediates their binding to lymphoid cells. J Clinic
Endocrinol Metabolism, 1997;82:101-105
41 Tang ZY. Clinical
research of hepatocellular carcinoma in the 21st century. China
Natl J New Gastroenterol, 1995;1:2-3
42 Shimizu Y, Minemura
M, Tsukishiro T, Kashii Y, Miyamoto M, Nishimori H, Higlichi K,
Watanabe A. Serum concentration
of intercellular adhesion molecule-1 in patients with
hepatocellular carcinoma is a marker of the disease progre
ssion and prognosis. Hepatology,
1995;22:525-531
43 Sun JJ, Zhou XD, Liu
YK, Tang ZY, Feng JX, Zhou G, Xue Q, Chen J. Invasion and metastasis
of liver cancer: expression
of intercellular adhesion molecule 1.
J Cancer Clin Oncol, 1999;125:28-34
44 Momosaki S, Yano H,
Ogasawara S, Higaki K, Hisaka T, Kojiro M. Expression of
intercellular adhesion molecule 1 in
human hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatology,
1995;22:1708-1713
45 Hyodo I, Jinno K,
Tanimizu M, Hosokawa Y, Nishikawa Y, Akiyama M, Mandai K, Moriwaki
S. Detection of circulating
intercellular adhesion molecule-1 in
hepatocellular carcinoma. Int J Cancer, 1993;55:775-779
| |